Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:18:28.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Edited by
Amrei Müller
In collaboration with
Hege Elisabeth Kjos
Amrei Müller
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Hege Elisabeth Kjos
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights , pp. 543 - 554
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Adjami, M., ‘African Courts, International Law, and Comparative Case Law: Chimera or Emerging Human Rights Jurisprudence?’, Michigan Journal of International Law 24:1 (2002) 103–169.Google Scholar
Ahdieh, R.B. ‘Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts’, New York University Law Review 79 (2004) 2029–2163.Google Scholar
Alford, R., ‘In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism’, University of California Law Review 52:3 (2005) 639–715.Google Scholar
Alford, R., ‘Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrus, M. ‘Comparative Law Method in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Rule of Law’, Erasmus Law Review 2:3 (2009) 353–371.Google Scholar
Andenæs, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. (ed.), The Universalism of Human Rights, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspective on Law and Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahdi, R., ‘Globalisation of Judgment: Transjudicialism and the Five Faces of International Law in Domestic Courts’, George Washington International Law Review 34 (2002) 555–588.Google Scholar
Bederman, D. J., ‘Diversity and Permeability in Transnational Governance’, Emory Law Journal 57:1 (2007) 201–233.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Benvenisiti, E. and Downs, G., ‘Towards Global Checks and Balances’, Constitutional Political Economy 20:3–4 (2009) 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, R., ‘The Democratising Effects of Transjudicial Coordination’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 158–171.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 301–330.Google Scholar
Bingham, T. H., Widening Horizons: The Influence of Comparative Law and International Law on Domestic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. and Epstein, L., ‘(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication’, Law and Social Inquiry 32:3 (2007) 789–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobek, M., Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmer, M., ‘Use of Foreign Law as a Strategy to Build Constitutional and Democratic Authority’, Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 77: 411 (2008) 411–432.Google Scholar
Bratza, N., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Process of Mutual Enrichment’, Rosas, A. et al. (eds.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013) 167–181.Google Scholar
Brock, G. (ed.), Cosmopolitanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brok, R., Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges (Cambridge, MA: Aei Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bryde, B., ‘The Constitutional Judge and the International Constitutionalist Dialogue’, Tulane Law Review 80:1 (2005) 203–219.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, T., ‘Modern Constitutions and Human Rights Treaties’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36:1–2 (1998) 211–223.Google Scholar
Burke-White, W., ‘International Legal Pluralism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2004) 963–980.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, H., ‘From Empire to Globalization … and Back? A Post-Colonial View of Transjudicialism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11:1 (2004) 183–189.Google Scholar
Calabresi, S. and Dotson Zimdahl, S., ‘The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision’, William and Mary Law Review 47:3 (2005) 743–909.Google Scholar
Canivet, G., Andenæs, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute for International and Comparative Law, 2004).Google Scholar
Carozza, P., ‘Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Notre Dame Law Review 73:5 (1998) 1217–1237.Google Scholar
Cartabia, M., ‘Europe and Rights: Taking Dialogue Seriously’, European Constitutional Law Review 5:1 (2009) 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W.-C., ‘The Convergence of Constitutions and International Human Rights: Taiwan and South Korea Comparisons’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 36:3 (2011) 593–625.Google Scholar
Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Alford, R., ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’ Indiana Law Journal 74:3 (1999) 819–892.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J., Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claes, M. and de Visser, M. ‘Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R., Feldbrugge, F. and Pomorski, S. (eds.) International and National Law in Russia and Eastern Europe, Essays in Honor of George Ginsburgs (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001).Google Scholar
Claydon, J., ‘International Human Rights Law and the Interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Supreme Court Law Review 4 (1982) 287–302.Google Scholar
Coester, M., ‘Same-Sex Relationships: A Comparative Assessment of Legal Developments Across Europe’, European Journal of Law Reform 4:2 (2002) 585–601.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. G., ‘Finding International Law, Part II: Our Fragmenting Legal Community’, New York University Journal of Law and Politics 44:4 (2012) 1049–1108.Google Scholar
Danilenko, G. M., ‘Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice’, European Journal of International Law 10:1 (1999) 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Burca, G. and Gerstenberg, O. ‘The Denationalization of Constitutional Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 47:1 (2006) 243–262.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M., Ordering Pluralism. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M., The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Versus National Restrictions (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsen, N. ‘The Relevance of Foreign Legal Materials in US Constitutional Cases: A Conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:4 (2005) 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, N., Judges and Jurists: An Essay on Influence (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K. and Lukashevich, V., ‘Informed Decision-Making: The Comparative Endeavours of the Strasbourg Court’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30:3 (2012) 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egede, E., ‘Bringing Human Rights Home: An Examination of the Domestication of Human Rights Treaties in Nigeria’, Journal of African Law 51:2 (2007) 249–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, O. K. and Nollkaemper, A. (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar
Ferrarese, M. R., ‘When National Actors Become Transnational: Transjudicial Dialogue between Democracy and Constitutionalism’, Global Jurist 9:1 (2009) 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. and Gambaro, A., ‘The Italian Constitutional Court and Comparative Law. A Premise’, Comparative Law Review 1:1 (2010) 1–22.Google Scholar
Fischel De Andrade, J. H., ‘Regional Policy Approaches and Harmonization: A Latin American Perspective’, International Journal of Refugee Law 10:3 (1998) 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2004) 999–1046.Google Scholar
Flanagan, B. and Ahern, S., ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flogiatis, S., Zwart, T. and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents – Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fontana, D., ‘Refined Comparativism in Constitutional Law’, UCLA Law Review 49:2 (2001) 539–623.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F., Martinico, G. and Carrozza, P. (eds.), Shaping Rule of Law through Dialogue. International and Supranational Experiences (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Forowicz, M., The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg, G., ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals and Ideology – Towards a Layered Narrative’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4:3 (2006) 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, D., Paladini, L. and Pustorino, P. (eds.), Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions (Berlin: Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law 62:1 (2014) 35–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe’, Supreme Court Economic Review 21:1 (2013) 215–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten European Supreme Courts’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D., ‘Globalization and Legal Knowledge: Implications for Comparative Law’, Tulane Law Review 75:4 (2000) 949–975.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glensy, R., ‘Which Countries Count?: Lawrence v. Texas and the Selection of Foreign Persuasive Authority’, Virginia Journal of International Law 45:2 (2005) 357–449.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, G. S. and Lambert, H. (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groppi, T., ‘A User-Friendly Court. The Influence of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions Since 1982 on Court Decisions in Other Liberal Democracies’, Supreme Court Law Review 36 (2007) 337–364.Google Scholar
Hallo de Wolf, A. and Wallace, D., ‘The Overseas Exchange of Human Rights Jurisprudence: The US Supreme Court in the European Court of Human Rights’, International Criminal Justice Review 19:3 (2009) 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, A. and Ruiz Fabri, H., ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. ‘Comparative Reasoning and Judicial Review’, Yale Journal of International Law 28 (2003) 409–464.Google Scholar
Harris, D., et al. (eds.), Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hart, N., ‘Complementary Protection and Transjudicial Dialogue: Global Best Practice or Race to the Bottom?’, International Journal of Refugee Law 28:2 (2016) 171–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L., ‘Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Cornell International Law Journal 26:1 (1993) 133–165.Google Scholar
Helfer, L., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 125–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L., and Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107:2 (1997) 273–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘A New Birth of Constitutionalism: Genetic Influences and Genetic Defects’, Cardozo Law Review 14:3–4 (1993) 533–547.Google Scholar
Heringa, A., ‘The Consensus Principle – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3:2 (1996) 106–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K., ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9:1 (1989) 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirji, Z. (ed.), Diversity and Plurality in Islam: Historical and Contemporary Discourses amongst Muslims (New York: IB Tauris, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53:1 (2005) 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V., ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’, Harvard Law Review 119:1 (2005) 109–128.Google Scholar
Jackson, V., Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. G., ‘Judicial Dialogue and the Cross-Fertilization of Legal Systems: The European Court of Justice’, Texas International Law Journal 38:3 (2003) 547–557.Google Scholar
Jaremba, U. and Mak, E., ‘Interviewing Judges in the Transnational Context’, Law and Method 5 (2014) 1–15.Google Scholar
Keller, H. and Stone-Sweet, A. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D., ‘One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream’, New York University Review of Law & Social Change 31:3 (2007) 641–660.Google Scholar
Killander, M. (ed.), International Law and Human Rights Litigation in Africa (Cape Town: Pretoria University Law Press, 2010).Google Scholar
King, M. and Thornhill, C. (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Kirby, M., ‘Commentaries: Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Internationalisation of Law and Australian Judges’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 9:1 (2008) 171–189.Google Scholar
Kirby, M., ‘Domestic Courts and International Human Rights Law: The Ongoing Judicial Conversation’, Utrecht Law Review 6:1 (2010) 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C., ‘Judicial Dialogue for Legal Multiculturalism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2003–2004) 879–903.Google Scholar
Koh, H., ‘International Law as Part of Our Law’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review 70:1 (2007) 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krotoszynski, R., ‘“I’d Like the World to Sing (in Perfect Harmony)”: International Judicial Dialogue and the Muses – Reflections in the Perils and the Promise of International Judicial Dialogue’, Michigan Law Review 104:6 (2006) 1321–1359.Google Scholar
Kurczewski, J. and Sullivan, B. ‘The Bill of Rights and the Emerging Democracies’, Law and Contemporary Problems 65:2 (2002) 251–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’Heurreux-Dube, C., ‘The Importance of Dialogue: Globalization and the International Impact of the Rehnquist Court’, Tulsa Law Journal 34:15 (1998) 15–40.Google Scholar
La Forest, G. V., ‘The Expanding Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in International Law Issues’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 34 (1996) 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, H., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58:3 (2009) 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J., ‘Importing Constitutional Norms from a “Wider Civilisation”: Lawrence, the Rehnquist Court’s Use of Foreign and International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation’, Ohio State Law Journal 65:5 (2004) 1283–1329.Google Scholar
Lavranos, N., ‘The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions Among International Courts and Tribunals’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 30:3 (2008) 275–334.Google Scholar
Law, D. S. and Chang, W.-C., ‘The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue’, Washington Law Review 86:3 (2011) 523–578.Google Scholar
Law, D. S. and Versteeg, M., ‘The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution’, New York University Law Review 87:3 (2012) 762–858.Google Scholar
Lazega, E. ‘Mapping Judicial Dialogue Across National Borders: An Explanatory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, J. K., ‘Bottom-Up International Lawmaking: Reflections on the New Haven School of International Law’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 393–420.Google Scholar
Likosky, M. (ed.), Transnational Legal Processes: Globalisation and Power Disparities (London: Butterworths, 2002).Google Scholar
Lyke, S. B., ‘Brown Abroad: An Empirical Analysis of Foreign Judicial Citation and the Metaphor of Cosmopolitan Conversation’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 45:1 (2012) 83–144.Google Scholar
MacGregor, E. F. and Gil, R. S., ‘Foreign Precedents in Mexican Constitutional Adjudication’, Mexican Law Review 4:2 (2012) 293–307.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, J. M., ‘The Use of American Cases in Canadian Courts’, University of British Columbia Law Review 2:3 (1964–1966) 478–490.Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective. Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag KG, 2000).Google Scholar
Mak, E., ‘Why do Dutch and UK Judges Cite Foreign Law?’, Cambridge Law Journal 70:2 (2011) 420–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, E., Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Manfredi, C.P., ‘The Use of United States Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:3 (1990) 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markesinis, B. and Fedtke, J., Engaging with Foreign Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. and Fedtke, J., Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Marochkin, S. Y., ‘International Law in the Courts of the Russian Federation: Practice of Application’, Chinese Journal of International Law 6:2 (2007) 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinek, M., ‘Comparative Jurisprudence – What Good Does It Do – History, Tasks, Methods, Achievements and Perspectives of an Indispensable Discipline of Legal Research and Education’, Journal of South African Law 1 (2013) 39–57.Google Scholar
Martinez, J. S., ‘Towards an International Judicial System’, Stanford Law Review 56:2 (2003) 429–529.Google Scholar
Martinico, G. and Pollicino, O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems. Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, P., ‘Waiting for Globalization: An Empirical Study of the McLachlin Court’s Foreign Judicial Citations’, Ottawa Law Review 41:2 (2010) 209–244.Google Scholar
McCrudden, C., ‘Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E., ‘From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization: A Review Essay on Martin Chanok, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia Zambia’, Law and Social Inquiry 28:2 (2003) 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R., ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (2009) 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, S. and Richards, S. (eds.), Highest Courts and Globalisation (The Hague: Asser Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müllerson, R., Fitzmaurice, M. and Andenæs, M. (eds.), Constitutional Reforms and International Law in Central and Eastern Europe (The Hague: Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
Murphy, C., ‘Human Rights Law and the Challenges of Explicit Judicial Dialogue’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, NYU School of Law 12:10 (2012) 1–32.Google Scholar
Murray, J. L., ‘Judicial Cosmopolitanism’, Judicial Studies Institute Journal 8:2 (2008) 1–17.Google Scholar
Neuman, G., ‘Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, G., ‘The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neves, M., Transconstitucionalismo (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice?’, Chinese Journal of International Law 5:2 (2006) 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örücü, E. (ed.), Judicial Comparativism in Human Rights Cases (London: British Institute for International and Comparative Law, 2003).Google Scholar
Osiatynski, W., ‘Paradoxes of Constitutional Borrowing’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombella, G. and Walker, N. (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Supremacy Lost: International Law Meets Domestic Constitutional Law’, Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 3:3 (2009) 170–198.Google Scholar
Petrov, R. and Kalinichenko, P., ‘The Europeanization of Third Country Judiciaries through the Application of the EU Aquis: The Cases of Russia and Ukraine’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:2 (2011) 325–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E. A. and Sunstein, C. R., ‘The Law of Other States’, Stanford Law Review 59:1 (2006) 131–179.Google Scholar
Prost, M., ‘All Shouting the Same Slogans: International Law’s Unity and the Politics of Fragmentation’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law 17 (2006) 1–29.Google Scholar
Ramsey, M., ‘International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, K., ‘Constitutional, Remedial and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience’, Texas Journal of International Law 40:3 (2004–2005) 537–577.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, C., ‘Deciphering the Grammar of the International Jurisprudential Dialogue’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 41:4 (2008) 755–787.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, C. F., ‘Against Borrowings and Other Non-Authoritative Uses of Foreign Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozakis, C., ‘The European Judge as Comparatist’, Tulane Law Review 80:1 (2005–2006) 257–279.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W., ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review 9:3 (2009) 397–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T., ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’, European Journal of International Law 19:4 (2008) 799–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senden, H., Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar
Shany, Y., ‘National Courts as International Actors: Jurisdictional Implications’, Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comunitario e Comparato 15:1 (2009) 1–31.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (ed.), International Law and Domestic Legal Orders, Incorporation, Transformation and Persuasion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal 44:1 (2003) 191–291.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Typology of Transjudicial Communication’, University of Richmond Law Review 29:1 (1994–1995) 99–139.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Judicial Globalization’, Virginia Journal of International Law 40:4 (2000) 1103–1124.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1997) 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M., Stone Sweet, A. and Weiler, J. (eds.), The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Legal Change in Its Social Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Sloss, D. (ed.), The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., ‘Making Itself at Home: Understanding Foreign Law in Domestic Jurisprudence: The Indian Case’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 24:1 (2006) 218–273.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Wiest, D., ‘The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association’, Social Forces 84:2 (2005) 621–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithey, S. I., ‘A Tool, Not A Master. The Use of Foreign Case Law in Canada and South Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 34:10 (2001) 1188–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staes, D., ‘The Use of Documents Other than the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols before the European Court of Human Rights. Reflections From and Upon a Users’ Perspective’, Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 2 (2014) 186–214.Google Scholar
Stephan, P. B., ‘Courts on Courts: Contracting for Engagement and Indifference in International Judicial Encounters’, Virginia Law Review 100:1 (2014) 17–111.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., ‘Beyond National Law: The Neglected Role of International Law of Personal Jurisdiction in Domestic Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal 36:2 (1995) 373–425.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Brookfield: Dartmouth Pub Co, 1996).Google Scholar
Treves, T., et al. (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, P. ‘Foreign Precedents and Constitutional Law’, Columbia Law Review 57:3 (1957) 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochev, A., ‘All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia’ Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 17:2 (2009) 145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale Law Journal 108:6 (1999) 1225–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, (2004) Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 36:49 (2004) 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, E., ‘Borrowing and Non-borrowing among International Courts’, The Journal of Legal Studies 39:2 (2010) 547–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voßkuhle, A., ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Review 6:2 (2010) 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waaldijk, K., ‘Others May Follow: The Introduction of Marriage, Quasi-Marriage and Semi-Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Europe’, New England Law Review 38:3 (2003–2004) 569–589.Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium’, Harvard Law Review 119:1 (2005) 125–147.Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, M. A., ‘Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend Toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties’, Columbia Law Review 107:3 (2007) 628–706.Google Scholar
Waters, M. A., ‘Mediating Norms and Identity: The Role of Transnational Judicial Dialogue in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, Georgetown Law Journal 93:2 (2005) 487–574.Google Scholar
Waters, M. A., ‘Normativity in the “New” Schools: Assessing the Legitimacy of International Legal Norms Created by Domestic Courts’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 455–484.Google Scholar
Weisbrud, M., ‘Using International Law to Interpret National Constitutions – Conceptual Problems: Reflections on Justice Kirby’s Advocacy of International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation’, American University International Law Review 21:3 (2006) 365–379.Google Scholar
Wells, M., ‘International Norms in Constitutional Law’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 32:2 (2004) 429–436.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, L., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56:2 (2007) 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildhaber, L., Hjartarson, A. and Donnelly, S., ‘No Consensus on Consensus? The Practice of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal 33:7–12 (2013) 248–263.Google Scholar
Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Amrei Müller, Universitetet i Oslo
  • In collaboration with Hege Elisabeth Kjos, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316780237.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Amrei Müller, Universitetet i Oslo
  • In collaboration with Hege Elisabeth Kjos, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316780237.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Amrei Müller, Universitetet i Oslo
  • In collaboration with Hege Elisabeth Kjos, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights
  • Online publication: 04 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316780237.021
Available formats
×