Works Consulted

Alister E. McGrath

doi:10.1017/9781108560702.039

Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, ed. Elliger, K., Rudolph, W., Schenker, A. and Kittel, R.. 5th edn. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1998.Google Scholar

Biblia Sacra iuxta Vulgatam versionem. 4th edn. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994.Google Scholar

The Earlier Version of the Wycliffite Bible, ed. Lindberg, C.. 8 vols. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1959.Google Scholar

Libri Psalmorum versio antiqua Latina cum paraphrasi Anglo-Saxonica, ed. Thorpe, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1835.Google Scholar

Septuaginta, ed. Rahlfs, A. and Hanhart, R.. Editio altera. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2014.Google Scholar

Acta Reformationis Catholicae, ed. Pfeilschifter, G.. 6 vols. Regensburg: Pustet, 1959–74.Google Scholar

Die Bekenntnisschriften der Evangelisch–Lutherischen Kirche: Vollständige Neuedition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.Google Scholar

Die Bekenntnisschriften der reformierten Kirche, ed. Müller, E. F. K.. Leipzig: Deichert, 1903.Google Scholar

Concilium Tridentinum diarorum, actorum, epistularum, tractatuum nova collectio. Freiburg: Societas Goersiana, 1901–50.Google Scholar

Corpus Christianorum Series Latina. Turnholt: Brepols, 1953–.Google Scholar

Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1886–.Google Scholar

Denzinger, H., Enchiridion Symbolorum Definitionum et Declarationum de Rebus Fidei et Morum. 39th edn. Freiburg: Herder, 2001.Google Scholar

Dokumente zur Causa Lutheri (1517–1521), ed. Fabish, Peter and Iserloh, Erwin. 2 vols. Münster: Aschendorff, 1988–91.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C., Formularies of Faith Put Forth by Authority during the Reign of Henry VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1825.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C., Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar

Migne, J. P., Patrologia cursus completus series Latina. 221 vols. Paris: Migne, 1844–64.Google Scholar

Migne, J. P., Patrologia cursus completus series Graeca. 162 vols. Paris: Migne, 1857–66.Google Scholar

The Pearl, ed. Gordon, E. V.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Opuscoli e lettere di riformatori italiani del cinquecento, ed. Paladino, G.. 2 vols. Bari: Laterza, 1913–27.Google Scholar

The Two Books of Homilies Appointed to Be Read in Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1859.Google Scholar

Romanus, Aegidius, Commentarius in secundum librum sententiarum. 2 vols. Venice, 1581.Google Scholar

Ælfric of Eynsham, Homilies, ed. Thorpe, B.. 2 vols. London: Ælfric Society, 1846.Google Scholar

Magnus, Albertus, Opera omnia, ed. Borgnet, S. C. A.. 38 vols. Paris: Vives, 1890–9.Google Scholar

Alexander, III, Die Sentenzen Rolands, nachmals Papstes Alexander III, ed. Gietl, A. M.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1969.Google Scholar

Alexander of Hales, Glossa in IV. Libros sententiarum. 4 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1951–7.Google Scholar

Alexander of Hales, Quaestiones disputatae antequam esset frater. 3 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1960.Google Scholar

Alexander of Hales (attributed), Summa Theologica. 4 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–48.Google Scholar

Alsted, Johann Heinrich, Theologia scholastica didactica. Hanover, 1618.Google Scholar

Ambrosiaster, , Commentary on the Pauline Epistles: Romans, ed. and trans. De Bruyn, T., Cooper, S. A. and Hunter, D. G.. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Andrewes, Launcelot, Works. 11 vols. London, 1841–52.Google Scholar

Anselm of Canterbury, Opera omnia, ed. Schmitt, F. S.. 6 vols. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1968.Google Scholar

Anselm of Laon, Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen, ed. Bliemetzrieder, F. P.. Münster: Aschendorff, 1919.Google Scholar

Arminius, Jakobus, Works. 3 vols. London: Thomas Baker, 1825–75.Google Scholar

Baius, Michel, Opera. Cologne, 1696.Google Scholar

Barlow, Thomas, Two Letters Written by the Rt Rev. Thomas Barlow. London, 1701.Google Scholar

Barnes, Robert, A supplicatyon Made by Robert Barnes Doctoure in Divinite unto the Most Excellent and Redoubted Prince Kinge Henrye the Eyght. Antwerp, 1531.Google Scholar

Barrow, Isaac, Theological Works, ed. Napier, A.. 9 vols. Cambridge, 1859.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, ‘Die Gerechtigkeit Gottes’, in Das Wort Gottes und die Theologie. Munich: Kaiser, 1925, 5–17.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Die Christliche Theologie im Entwurf. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1927.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Kirchliche Dogmatik. 13 vols. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1932–68.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Rechtfertigung und Recht. Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischen Buchhandlung, 1938.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Die Protestantische Theologie im 19. Jahrhundert. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, Die Theologie Calvins, 1922. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl, ‘Gespräch mit Vertretern der Herrnhuter Brüdergemeine’, in Gespräche 1959–1962, ed. Busch, E.. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1995, 124–57.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard, Aphorisms on Justification. London, 1649.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard, A Treatise of Justifying Righteousness. London, 1676.Google Scholar

Bellarmine, Roberto, Disputationum de controversiis Christianae fidei. Ingolstadt, 1601.Google Scholar

[Benedetto da Mantova, Dom?], Il beneficio di Cristo con le versioni del secolo XVI, ed. Caponetto, Salvatore. Florence: Salvatori, 1972.Google Scholar

Beveridge, William, Theological Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1844–8.Google Scholar

Beza, Theodore, Iesu Christi Domini Nostri Novum Testamentum … Annotationes. 5th edn. Geneva, 1598.Google Scholar

Beza, Theodore, Tractationes theologicae. 2nd edn. Geneva, 1632.Google Scholar

Biel, Gabriel, Sermones dominicales de tempore. Hagenau, 1510.Google Scholar

Biel, Gabriel, Canonis missae expositio, ed. Oberman, H. A. and Courtenay, W. J.. 4 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963–7.Google Scholar

Biel, Gabriel, Collectorium circa quattuor libros sententiarum, ed. Werbeck, W. and Hoffmann, U.. 4 vols. Tübingen Mohr, 1973–84.Google Scholar

Bonaventure, Opera omnia. 10 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaven-turae, 1882–1902.Google Scholar

Bradwardine, Thomas, De causa Dei contra Pelagium. London, 1618.Google Scholar

Bramhall, John, Works. 5 vols. Oxford, 1842–5.Google Scholar

Brochmand, Jesper Rasmussen, Universae theologiae systema. Ulm, 1638.Google Scholar

Brunner, Emil. Das Ärgernis des Christentums: Fünf Vorlesungen über den christlichen Glauben. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar

Brunner, Emil. Dogmatik III: Die christliche Lehre von der Kirche, vom Glauben, und von der Vollendung. Zurich: Zwingli-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar

Brunner, Emil. ‘Die Offenbarung als Grund und Gegenstand der Theologie’, in Ein offenes Wort. 2 vols. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1981, vol. 1, 98–122.Google Scholar

Bucanus, Guillaume, Institutiones theologicae. N.p., 1604.Google Scholar

Bucer, Martin, Metaphrasis et Enarrationes in Epistolam ad Romanos. Strasbourg, 1536.Google Scholar

Bucer, Martin, Praelectiones in epistolam ad Ephesios. Basel, 1561.Google Scholar

Bucer, Martin, Metaphrasis et enarratio in epistolam ad Romanos. Basel, 1562.Google Scholar

Buddeus, Johann Franz, Institutiones theologiae dogmaticae. Jena, 1723.Google Scholar

Bull, George, Harmonia apostolica. London, 1842.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich, Sermonum decades quinque. Zurich, 1552.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich, De gratia Dei iustificante. Zurich, 1554.Google Scholar

Burmann, Franz, Synopsis theologiae. Amsterdam, 1699.Google Scholar

Calov, Abraham, Systema locorum theologicorum. Wittenberg, 1655.Google Scholar

Calvin, John, Opera omnia quae supersunt. 59 vols. Brunswick, 1863–1900.Google Scholar

Calvin, John, Opera selecta, ed. Barth, P. and Niesel, W.. 5 vols. Munich: Kaiser, 1922–36.Google Scholar

Catechismus Romanus. Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1852.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Martin, Loci theologici. 3 vols. Frankfurt, 1599.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Martin, Examinis Concilii Tridentini. Frankfurt, 1646.Google Scholar

Chubb, Thomas, Several Inquiries. London, 1718.Google Scholar

Chubb, Thomas, Posthumous Works. 2 vols. London, 1747.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel, The Saints Nosegay, or, 741 Spiritual Flowers. London, 1642.Google Scholar

Cocceius, Johannes, Summa theologiae. Amsterdam, 1665.Google Scholar

Cocceius, Johannes, Opera. 8 vols. Amsterdam, 1673–5.Google Scholar

Contarini, Gasparo, Regesten und Briefe, ed. Dittrich, F.. Braunsberg: Emil Bender, 1881.Google Scholar

Contarini, Gasparo, Gegenreformatorische Schriften 1530–42, ed. Hünermann, F.. Münster: Aschendorff, 1923.Google Scholar

Cosin, John, Works. 5 vols. Oxford, 1843–55.Google Scholar

Cotton, John, Gods Mercie Mixed with His Iustice. London, 1641.Google Scholar

Cotton, John, Christ the Fountaine of Life. London, 1651.Google Scholar

Cotton, John, A Treatise of the Covenant of Grace. London, 1659.Google Scholar

Cranmer, Thomas, Works. 2 vols. Cambridge, 1844–6.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante, La divina commedia, ed. Mattalia, D.. 3 vols. Milan: Rizzoli, 1975.Google Scholar

Davenant, John, A Treatise on Justification, or the ‘Disputatio de Iustitia Habituali et Actuali’. London, 1844.Google Scholar

De Molina, Luis, Concordia liberii arbitrii cum gratiae donis. Lisbon, 1588.Google Scholar

De Soto, Domingo, De natura et gratia. Paris, 1549.Google Scholar

De Soto, Domingo, In epistolam ad Romanos commentarii. Antwerp, 1550.Google Scholar

De Suárez, Francisco, Opera omnia. 28 vols. Paris Vives, 1856–78.Google Scholar

De Valdés, Juan, Diálogo de doctrina cristiana, ed. Stockwell, B. F.. Mexico: Mexico City, 1946.Google Scholar

De Valdés, Juan, Las ciento diez divinas consideraciones, ed. Idigoras, J. I. T.. Salamanca: Centro de Estudios Orientales y Ecuménicos, 1975.Google Scholar

De Vega, Andrés, Opusculum de iustificatione. Venice, 1546.Google Scholar

De Vega, Andrés, De iustificatione doctrina universa. Cologne, 1572.Google Scholar

Downham, George, A Treatise of Justification. London, 1639.Google Scholar

Duns Scotus, John, Commentaria Oxoniensia. 2 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1912–14.Google Scholar

Duns Scotus, John, Opera omnia, ed. Balic, C.. Rome: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1950–.Google Scholar

Durandus of St Pourçain, In Petri Lombardi sententias theologicas commentariorum. 2 vols. Venice, 1571.Google Scholar

Ebeling, Gerhard, Dogmatik des christlichen Glaubens. 3 vols: Tübingen: Mohr, 1979.Google Scholar

Eck, Johannes, Chrysospassus praedestinationis. Augsburg, 1514.Google Scholar

Eck, Johannes, In primum librum sententiarum annotatiunculae, ed. Moore, L.. Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jonathan, Five Discourses on Justification by Faith. Boston, 1738.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jonathan, Works, ed. Hickman, E.. 2 vols. London, 1834.Google Scholar

Eedes, John, The Orthodox Doctrine concerning Justification. London, 1642.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius, Novum instrumentum omne. Basel, 1516.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius, Opera omnia, ed. Clericus, J.. 10 vols. Leiden, 1703–6.Google Scholar

Eyre, William, Vindiciae iustificationis gratuitae. London, 1654.Google Scholar

Farel, Guillaume, Summaire et briefve declaration, ed. Piaget, A.. Paris: Droz, 1935.Google Scholar

Fisher, John, Opera. Würzburg, 1597.Google Scholar

Fisher, John, English Works, ed. Mayor, J. E. B.. EETS extra series 27. London, 1876.Google Scholar

Forbes, William, Considerationes modestae et pacificae. 2 vols. London, 1850–6.Google Scholar

Frith, John, Whole Workes. London, 1573.Google Scholar

Gataker, Thomas, An Antidote against Error. London, 1670.Google Scholar

Gerhard, Johann, Loci communes, ed. Cotta, Johann F.. 10 vols. Tübingen, 1768.Google Scholar

Godescalc of Orbais, Oeuvres théologiques et grammaticales, ed. Lambot, C.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1945.Google Scholar

Gogarten, Friedrich, ʻDas Problem einer theologischen Anthropologie’. ZZ 7 (1929), 493–511.Google Scholar

Goodwin, John, Imputatio fidei; or A Treatise of Justification. London, 1615.Google Scholar

Gregory of Rimini, Lectura super primum et secundum sententiarum, ed. Trapp, A. D.. 6 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979–84.Google Scholar

Gropper, Johann, Enchiridion Christianae institutiones. Cologne, 1536.Google Scholar

Gropper, Johann, Antidigagma. Cologne, 1544.Google Scholar

Hafenreffer, Matthias, Loci theologici. Tübingen, 1603.Google Scholar

Hall, Joseph, Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1837–9.Google Scholar

Hammond, Henry, A Practical Catechism. London, 1847.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Johann Heinrich, Medulla theologiae Christianae. Zurich, 1616.Google Scholar

Henke, Heinrich Philipp Konrad, Lineamenta institutionum fidei Christianae. Helmstedt, 1793.Google Scholar

Hincmar of Reims, ‘Zwei Schriften des Erzbischofs Hinkmar von Reims’, ed. Gundlach, W.. ZKG 10 (1889), 92–145, 258–310.Google Scholar

Hoard, Samuel, and Mason, Henry, God’s Love to Mankind Manifested by Disproving His Absolute Decree for Their Damnation. N.p., 1633.Google Scholar

Holcot, Robert, Opus super sapientiam Salomonis. Hagenau, 1494.Google Scholar

Holcot, Robert, Quaestiones super IV libros sententiarum. Leiden, 1497.Google Scholar

Hooker, Richard, Works, ed. Keble, J.. 3rd edn. 3 vols. Oxford, 1845.Google Scholar

Hooker, Thomas, The Soules Preparation for Christ. London, 1632.Google Scholar

Hooker, Thomas, The Soules Humiliation. London, 1638.Google Scholar

Hooker, Thomas, The Unbeleevers Preparing for Christ. London, 1638.Google Scholar

Hooker, Thomas, Thomas Hooker: Writings in England and Holland 1626–33. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Huss, John, Opera omnia, ed. Flajshans, V.. 3 vols. Prague, 1903–8.Google Scholar

Huss, John, Johannis Hus Tractatus Responsivus, ed. Thomson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Hutter, Leonhard, Compendium locorum theologicorum. Wittenberg, 1652.Google Scholar

Jackson, Thomas, Works. 12 vols. Oxford, 1844.Google Scholar

Jansenius, Cornelius, Augustinus. Paris, 1641.Google Scholar

John of La Rochelle, Die neuen Quästionen der Gnadentheologie des Johannes von Rupella, ed. Hodl, L.. Munich: Hueber, 1964.Google Scholar

Joye, George, Answer to Ashwell. [The Letters which Johan Ashwell, Priour of Newnham Abbey, Sent Secretly to the Byshop of Lyncolne …]. Antwerp, 1531.Google Scholar

Latomus, Jacobus, Duae Epistolae. Antwerp, 1544.Google Scholar

Laud, William. The History of the Troubles and Trial of … William Laud. 2 vols. London, 1695–1700.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Gesammelte Schriften. 22 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–42.Google Scholar

Knewstub, John, Lectures upon the Twentieth Chapter of Exodus. London, 1577.Google Scholar

Knox, Alexander, Remains, ed. Newman, J. H.. 2nd edn. 4 vols. London, 1836–7.Google Scholar

Koenig, Johann Friedrich, Theologia positiva acroamatica. 11th edn. Rostok, 1703.Google Scholar

Locke, John, The Reasonableness of Christianity, in Works, VII, London, 1823, 1–159.Google Scholar

Locke, John, Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Löscher, V. E., Vollständiger Timotheus Verinus oder Darlegung der Wahrheit und des Friedens in denen bisherigen Pietistischen Streitigkeiten. 2 vols. Wittenberg, 1718–21.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin, Kritische Gesamtausgabe. 72 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1883–2009.Google Scholar

Luttrell, Johannes, Die Schriften des Oxforder Kanzlers Johannes Lutterell, ed. Hoffmann, F.. Leipzig: St Benno, 1959.Google Scholar

Mair, John, Joannis Majoris doctoris theologiae in quartum sententiarum quaestiones. Paris: Badius, 1516.Google Scholar

Maresius, Samuel, Collegium theologicum. Geneva, 1662.Google Scholar

Victorinus, Marius, Commentarii in epistolas Pauli ad Ephesios, ad Galatos, ad Philippenses, ed. Gori, F.. Turin: Società editrice internazionale, 1981.Google Scholar

Matthew of Aquasparta, Quaestiones disputatae de gratia, ed. Doucet, V.. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1935.Google Scholar

Melanchthon, Philip, Opera omnia quae supersunt. 28 vols. Brunswick, 1834–60.Google Scholar

Melanchthon, Philip, Werke in Auswahl, ed. Stupperich, R.. 8 vols. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1951–75.Google Scholar

Morgan, Thomas, The Moral Philosopher. 3 vols. London, 1738–40.Google Scholar

Mosse, Miles, Iustifying and Saving Faith distinguished from the Faith of the Devils. Cambridge, 1614.Google Scholar

Musculus, Wolfgang, Loci communes sacrae theologiae. Basel, 1561.Google Scholar

Newman, John Henry, Remarks on Certain Passages in the Thirty-Nine Articles. Tract 90. Oxford, 1841.Google Scholar

Newman, John Henry, Lectures on the Doctrine of Justification. 3rd edn. London, 1874.Google Scholar

Rigaldi, Odo, In II Sent. dist. xxvi–xxix, ed. J. Bouvy, in ‘Les Questions sur la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud’, RThAM 27 (1960), 305–43; ‘La necessité de la grâce dans le Commentaire des Sentences d’Odon Rigaud’, RThAM 28 (1961), 69–96.Google Scholar

Owen, John, Works, ed. Russell, T.. 21 vols. London, 1826.Google Scholar

Pelagius, Commentary on St Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, ed. de Bruyn, T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Perkins, William, An Exposition of the Apostles Creed. Cambridge, 1595.Google Scholar

Perkins, William, Workes. 3 vols. Cambridge, 1608–9.Google Scholar

Petavius, Dionysius, Opus de theologicus dogmatibus. 3 vols. Antwerp, 1700.Google Scholar

Aureoli, Peter, Commentarorium in primum librum sententiarum. Rome, 1596.Google Scholar

Peter of Bergamo, Summa aurea. Venice, 1593.Google Scholar

Cantor, Peter, Summa de sacramentis et animae consiliis, ed. Dugauquier, J.-A.. 5 vols. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1954–67.Google Scholar

Lombard, Peter, Libri IV Sententiarum. 2nd edn. 2 vols. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1916.Google Scholar

Peter of Tarantaise, In IV libros sententiarum commentaria. 4 vols. Toulouse, 1649–52.Google Scholar

Pfaff, Christoph Matthaeus, Institutiones theologiae dogmaticae et moralis. Tübingen, 1720.Google Scholar

Philip the Chancellor, Summa de bono, ed. Wicki, N.. Bern: Franke, 1985.Google Scholar

Polanus a Polansdorf, Amandus, Syntagma theologiae Christianae. Geneva, 1612.Google Scholar

Quenstedt, Johannes Andreas, Theologia didactico-polemica. Wittenberg, 1685.Google Scholar

Richard of Middleton, Supra quattuor libros sententiarum. 4 vols. Brescia, 1591.Google Scholar

Robert of Melun, Questiones theologice de epistolis Pauli, ed. Martin, R. M.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1938.Google Scholar

Roger of Marston, Quaestiones disputatae de statu naturae lapsae. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1932.Google Scholar

Roland of Cremona, Summae magistri Rolandi Cremonensis, ed. Cortesi, A.. Bergamo: Edizioni Monumenta Bergomensia, 1962.Google Scholar

Sanderson, Robert, Sermons, ed. Montgomery, P.. 2 vols. London, 1841.Google Scholar

Scherzer, J. A., Breviculus theologicus. 3rd edn. Leipzig, 1680.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, F. D. E., Der christliche Glaube. 4th edn. 2 vols. Berlin, 1842–3.Google Scholar

Simon of Tournai, Les disputationes de Simon de Tournai, ed. Warichez, J.. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1932.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Thomas, Opera. 4 vols. Paris, 1620.Google Scholar

Steinbach, Wendelin, Opera exegetica quae supersunt omnia, ed. Feld, H.. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1976.Google Scholar

Steinbart, Gotthilf Samuel, System der reinen Philosophie oder Glückseligkeitslehre des Christenthums. Zullichau, 1778.Google Scholar

Taylor, Jeremy, Works, ed. Eden, C. P.. 10 vols. London, 1847–54.Google Scholar

Teller, Wilhelm Abraham, Die Religion der Vollkommnern. Berlin, 1792.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Opera omnia. 31 vols. Rome: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1882–1947.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Scriptum super libros sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, ed. Mandonnet, P. and Moos, F.. 4 vols. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929–47.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Super Epistolam ad Romanos Lectura. Rome: Marietti, 1953.Google Scholar

Thomas of Strasbourg, Commentaria in IIII libros sententiarum. Venice, 1564.Google Scholar

Tillich, Paul, The Protestant Era. London: Nisbet, 1951.Google Scholar

Tillich, Paul, ‘Das Neue Sein als Zentralbegriff einer christlichen Theologie’, in Eranos-Jahrbuch 1954. Vol. XXIII: Mensch und Wandlung. Zurich: Rhein-Verlag, 1955, 251–74.Google Scholar

Tillich, Paul, Rechtfertigung und Neues Sein. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018.Google Scholar

Tindal, Matthew, Christianity as Old as the Creation, ed. Gawlick, G.. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1968.Google Scholar

Toland, John, Christianity not Mysterious, ed. Gawlick, G.. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1964.Google Scholar

Töllner, Johann Gottlieb, Der thätige Gehorsam Christi untersucht. Breslau, 1768.Google Scholar

Töllner, Johann Gottlieb, Theologische Untersuchungen. 2 vols. Riga, 1772–4.Google Scholar

Turrettini, François, Institutio theologiae elencticae. 3 vols. Rome, 1734.Google Scholar

Tyndale, William, Works. 3 vols. Cambridge, 1848.Google Scholar

Ussher, James, Whole Works, ed. Elrington, C. R. and Todd, J. H.. 17 vols. Dublin, 1847–64.Google Scholar

Valla, Lorenzo, Monumenta politica et philosophica rariora. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, , 1959.Google Scholar

Van Mastricht, Peter, Theoretico-practica theologia. Amsterdam, 1725.Google Scholar

Van Rijssen, Leonhard, Compendium theologiae didactico elencticae. Amsterdam, 1695.Google Scholar

Vermigli, Peter Martyr, Loci Communes. London, 1583.Google Scholar

Vom Mosheim, Lorenz, Elementa theologiae dogmaticae. Nuremburg, 1758.Google Scholar

Walker, George, A Defence of the True Sense and Meaning of the Words of the Holy Apostle: Rom. 4 ver. 3.5.9. London, 1641.Google Scholar

Wendelin, Friedrich, Christianae theologiae. Amsterdam, 1646.Google Scholar

Wesley, John, Works. 14 vols. London: Epworth Press, 1829–31.Google Scholar

Wesley, John, Sermons on Several Occasions. London: Caxton Press, 1860.Google Scholar

William of Auvergne, Opera omnia. 2 vols. Paris. 1674.Google Scholar

William of Auxerre, Summa aurea in quattuor libros sententiarum. Paris, 1500.Google Scholar

William of Ockham, Commentaria in quattuor libros sententiarum. Leiden, 1495.Google Scholar

William of Ockham, Tractatus de praedestinatione et de praescientia Dei et de futuris contingentibus, ed. Boehmer, P.. New York: Franciscan Institute, 1945.Google Scholar

William of Ockham, Opera philosophica et theologica. 9 vols. New York: Franciscan Institute, 1966–.Google Scholar

Wollebius, Johannes, Christianae theologiae compendium. Amsterdam, 1637.Google Scholar

Zanchi, Girolamo, Commentarius in Epistolam Sancti Pauli ad Ephesios. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1888.Google Scholar

Zwingli, Huldrych, Sämtliche Werke. 4 vols. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1905–.Google Scholar

Aers, D., Salvation and Sin: Augustine, Langland, and Fourteenth-Century Theology. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Affeldt, W., ‘Verzeichnis der Römerbriefkommentare der lateinischen Kirche bis zu Nikolaus von Lyra’, Traditio 13 (1957), 369–406.Google Scholar

Alberigo, G., I vescovi italiani al Concilio di Trento (1545–1547). Florence: Sansoni, 1959.Google Scholar

Alberigo, G., ‘From the Council of Trent to “Tridentinism”’, in Bulman, R. F. and Parrella, F. J., eds, From Trent to Vatican II: Historical and Theological Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 19–37.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Ruth, Johanna Eleonora Petersen: Theologische Schriftstellerin des frühen Pietismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005.Google Scholar

Alfaro, J., ‘Sobrenatural y pecado original en Bayo’, RET 12 (1952), 3–76.Google Scholar

Alford, J. A., ‘Jesus the Jouster: The Christ-Knight and Medieval Theories of Atonement in Piers Plowman and the “Round Table” Sermons’, Yearbook of Langland Studies 10 (1996), 129–43.Google Scholar

Allen, M., and Swain, S. R., Reformed Catholicity: The Promise of Retrieval for Theology and Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.Google Scholar

Allison, C. F., The Rise of Moralism: The Proclamation of the Gospel from Hooker to Baxter. London: SPCK, 1966.Google Scholar

Althaus, P., ‘Gottes Gottheit als Sinn der Rechtfertigungslehre Luthers’, LuJ 13 (1931), 1–28.Google Scholar

Alszeghy, S., Nova creatura: la nozione della grazia nei commentari medievali di S. Paolo. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1956.Google Scholar

Amand de Mendieta, D., Fatalisme et liberté dans l’antiquité grecque. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’université, 1945.Google Scholar

Anatolios, K., ‘The Soteriological Significance of Christ’s Humanity in St. Athanasius’, SVThQ 40 (1996), 265–86.Google Scholar

Anatolios, K., ‘The Soteriological Grammar of Conciliar Christology’, The Thomist 78 (2014), 165–88.Google Scholar

Anciaux, P., La théologie du sacrament du pénance au XII^e siècle. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université, 1949.Google Scholar

Anderson, H. G., Murphy, T. A. and Burgess, J. A., eds, Justification by Faith: Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue VII. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1985.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. W., ‘Luther’s Sola Fide in Italy: 1542–1551’, ChH 38 (1969), 25–42.Google Scholar

Angenendt, A., ‘Fear, Hope, Death and Salvation’, in Arnold, J. H., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 289–304.Google Scholar

Ahnert, T., Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Arand, C. P., ‘Two Kinds of Righteousness as a Framework for Law and Gospel in the Apology’, LuQ 15 (2001), 417–39.Google Scholar

Armitage, J. M., ‘A Certain Rectitude of Order: Jesus and Justification according to Aquinas’, The Thomist 72 (2008), 45–66.Google Scholar

Armstrong, B. G., Calvinism and the Amyraut Heresy: Protestant Scholasticism and Humanism in Seventeenth-Century France. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Artis, A., ‘Locke and Original Sin’, Locke Studies 12 (2012), 201–19.Google Scholar

Ashley, K. M., ‘The Guiler Beguiled: Christ and Satan as Theological Tricksters in Medieval Religious Literature’, Criticism 24 (1982), 126–37.Google Scholar

Aspenson, S. S., ‘Anselmian Satisfaction, Duns Scotus and The Debt of Sin’, Modern Schoolman 73 (1996), 141–58.Google Scholar

Auer, J., Die menschliche Willensfreiheit im Lehrsystem des Thomas von Aquin und Johannes Duns Skotus. Munich: Hueber, 1938.Google Scholar

Auer, J., ‘Textkritische Studien zur Gnadenlehre des Alexander von Hales’, Scholastik 15 (1940), 63–75.Google Scholar

Auer, J., Die Entwicklung der Gnadenlehre in der Hochscholastik. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1942–51.Google Scholar

Aulén, G., ‘Die drei Haupttypen des christlichen Versöhnungsgedankens’, ZSTh 8 (1930), 501–38.Google Scholar

Avemarie, F., Tora und Leben: Untersuchungen zur Heilsbedeutung der Tora in der frühen rabbinischen Literatur. Tübingen: Mohr, 1996.Google Scholar

Ayres, L., Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Ayres, L., ‘Into the Poem of the Universe: Exempla, Conversions, and Church in Augustine’s Confessiones’, ZAC 13 (2009), 263–81.Google Scholar

Baard, R. S., ‘Original Grace, Not Destructive Grace: A Feminist Appropriation of Paul Tillich’s Notion of Acceptance’, JR 87 (2007), 411–34.Google Scholar

Bäder-Butschle, I., Brüchige Fundamente: Eine Revision der Rechtfertigungslehre. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2017.Google Scholar

Badiou, A., Saint Paul: La fondation de l’universalisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar

Bagchi, D., ‘“Eyn mercklich underscheyd”: Catholic Reactions to Luther’s Doctrine of the Priesthood of All Believers, 1520–25’, SCH 26 (1989), 155–65.Google Scholar

Bagchi, D., ‘Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses and the Contemporary Criticism of Indulgences’, in Swanson, R., ed., Promissory Notes on the Treasury of Merits: Indulgences in the Later Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 2006, 331–55.Google Scholar

Bagchi, D., ‘Defining Heresies: Catholic Heresiologies, 1520–50’, SCH 43 (2007), 241–51.Google Scholar

Bagchi, D., Luther’s Earliest Opponents: Catholic Controversialists, 1518–25. 2nd edn. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Baker, D. W., ‘The Historical Faith of William Tyndale: Non-Salvific Reading of Scripture at the Outset of the English Reformation’, RenQ 62 (2009), 661–92.Google Scholar

Bakhuizen van den Brink, J. N., ‘Mereo(r) and Meritum in Some Latin Fathers’, StPatr 3 (1961), 333–40.Google Scholar

Bakhuizen van den Brink, J. N., Juan de Valdés réformateur en Espagne et en Italie. Geneva: Droz, 1969.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. W., Masters, Princes, and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter & His Circle. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Ball, D., ‘Libre arbitre et liberté dans Saint Augustin’, AThA 6 (1945), 368–82.Google Scholar

Ball, D., ‘Les développements de la doctrine de la liberté chez Saint Augustin’, AThA 7 (1946), 400–30.Google Scholar

Ballor, J. J., Covenant, Causality, and Law: A Study in the Theology of Wolfgang Musculus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar

Bammel, C. P., ‘Justification by Faith in Augustine and Origen’, JEH 47 (1996), 223–35.Google Scholar

Bannach, K., Die Lehre von der doppelten Macht Gottes bei Wilhelm von Ockham. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1975.Google Scholar

Barclay, J. M. G., ‘“Neither Jew Nor Greek”: Multiculturalism and the New Perspective on Paul’, in Brett, M. G., ed., Ethnicity and the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 1996, 197–214.Google Scholar

Barclay, J. M. G., ʻConstructing Judean Identity after 70 C.E.: A Study of Josephus’s “Against Apion”’, in Crook, Z. A. and Harland, P. A., eds, Identity and Interaction in the Ancient Mediterranean: Jews, Christians and Others. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007, 99–112.Google Scholar

Barclay, J. M. G., ‘Under Grace: The Christ-Gift and the Construction of a Christian Habitus’, in Gaventa, B., ed., Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2013, 59–76.Google Scholar

Barclay, J. M. G., Paul and the Gift. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Barclift, P. L., ‘In Controversy with Saint Augustine: Julian of Eclanum on the Nature of Sin’, RThAM 58 (1991), 5–20.Google Scholar

Barmann, L. F., ‘Baron Friedrich von Hügel and the Great War’, in Talar, C. J. T. and Barmann, L. F., eds, Roman Catholic Modernists Confront the Great War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, 77–106.Google Scholar

Barnett, M. J., ‘Erasmus and the Hermeneutics of Linguistic Praxis’, RenQ 49 (1996), 542–72.Google Scholar

Barnett, S. J., The Enlightenment and Religion: The Myths of Modernity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Barth, H.-M., ‘Martin Luther disputiert über den Menschen: Ein Beitrag zu Luthers Anthropologie’, KuD 27 (1981), 154–66.Google Scholar

Barth, U., ‘Das gebrochene Verhältnis zur Reformation: Beobachtungen zum Protestantismusverständnis Albrecht Ritschls’, in Berger, M. and Murrmann-Kahl, M., eds, Transformationsprozesse des Protestantismus: Zur Selbstreflexion einer christlichen Konfession an der Jahrtausendwende. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1999, 80–99.Google Scholar

Bartlett, R., The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Baschera, L., Tugend und Rechtfertigung: Peter Martyr Vermiglis Kommentar zur Nikomachischen Ethik im Spannungsfeld von Philosophie und Theologie. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar

Basse, M., Certitudo Spei: Thomas von Aquins Begründung der Hofffnungsgewissheit und ihre Rezeption bis zum Konzil von Trient: Ein Beitrag zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Eschatologie und Rechtfertigungslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993.Google Scholar

Basse, M., ‘Theologiegeschichtsschreibung und Kontroverstheologie: Die Bedeutung der Scholastik für die protestantische Kirchengeschichtsschreibung’, ZKG 107 (1996), 50–71.Google Scholar

Bastianel, S., ‘L’uomo giustificato, nuova creatura in Cristo. Il punto di vista cattolico’, in Ancona, G., ed., La giustificazione: Atti del VII Corso di Aggiornamento tenutosi a Roma nei giorni 2‒4 gennaio 1997. Padua: Il Messaggero, 195–213.Google Scholar

Batto, B. F., ‘Zedeq’, in van der Toorn, K., Becking, B. and van der Horst, P.W., eds, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Leiden: Brill, 1999, 923–34.Google Scholar

Bauks, M., ‘“Chaos” als Metapher für die Gefährdung der Weltordnung’, in Janowski, B., Ego, B. and Krüger, A., eds, Das biblische Weltbild und seine altorientalischen Kontexte. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001, 431–64.Google Scholar

Bauke-Ruegg, J., ‘Die Frage nach dem gnädigen Gott: Erinnerungen an einige Implikationen der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre’, EvTh 57 (1997), 474–95.Google Scholar

Baur, F. C., Die christliche Lehre von der Versöhnung in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung von der ältesten Zeit bis auf die neueste. Tübingen: C. F. Osiander, 1838.Google Scholar

Baur, J., Salus Christiana: Die Rechtfertigungslehre in der Geschichte des christlichen Heilsverständnisses. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1968.Google Scholar

Baur, J., Frei durch Rechtfertigung: Vorträge anlässlich der römisch-katholisch lutherischen ‘Gemeinsamen Erklärung’. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar

Bavaud, G., ‘La doctrine de la justification d’après Saint Augustin et la Réforme’, REAug 5 (1959), 21–32.Google Scholar

Bavaud, G., ‘La Doctrine de la justification d’après Calvin et le Concile de Trent’, VCaro 22 (1968), 83–92.Google Scholar

Bavaud, G., ‘L’attitude du réformateur Pierre Viret face à l’argument de prescription chez saint Augustin’, REAug 26 (1980), 257‒65.Google Scholar

Bavaud, G., Le réformateur Pierre Viret (1511‒1571): sa théologie. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1986.Google Scholar

Bayer, O., Promissio: Geschichte der reformatorischen Wende in Luthers Theologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971.Google Scholar

Bayer, O., ‘Tillich as a Systematic Theologian’, in Re Manning, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Paul Tillich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 18‒38.Google Scholar

Beach, J. M., ‘The Doctrine of the Pactum Salutis in the Covenant Theology of Herman Witsius’, MJT 13 (2002), 101–42.Google Scholar

Beachy, A. J., The Concept of Grace in the Radical Reformation. Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1977.Google Scholar

Beatrice, P. F., Tradux peccati: Alle fonti della dottrina agostiniana del peccato originale. Milan: Vita e pensiero, 1978.Google Scholar

Beavis, M. A., ‘Christian Origins, Egalitarianism, and Utopia’, JFSR 23 (2007), 27–49Google Scholar

Bebbington, D., ‘Revival and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England’, in Walker, A. and Aune, K., eds, On Revival: A Critical Examination. Carlisle: Paternoster, 2003, 71–86.Google Scholar

Bebbington, D., ‘Calvin and British Evangelicalism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, in Backus, I. and Benedict, P., eds, Calvin and His Influence, 1509–2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 282–300.Google Scholar

Beaufret, J., ‘Heidegger et la théologie’, in Kearny, R. and O’Leary, J. S., eds, Heidegger et la question de Dieu. Paris: Grasset, 1980, 19–36.Google Scholar

Beck, H., Vorsehung und Vorherbestimmung in der theologischen Literatur der Byzantiner. Rome: Institutum Orientalium studiorum, 1937.Google Scholar

Becker, K. J., Die Rechtfertigungslehre nach Domingo de Soto: Das Denken eines Konzilsteilnehmers vor, in und nach Trient. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. C., ‘Martin Chemnitz’s Use of the Church Fathers in His Locus on Justification’, CTQ 68 (2004), 271–90.Google Scholar

Bedouelle, G., ‘Le canon de l’Ancien Testament dans la perspectif du Concile de Trent’, in Kaestli, J. D. and Wermelinger, O., eds, Le Canon de l’Ancien Testament: sa formation et sa histoire. Geneva: Labor et Fides, 1984, 253–82.Google Scholar

Beeke, J. R., Debated Issues in Sovereign Predestination: Early Lutheran Predestination, Calvinian Reprobation, and Variations in Genevan Lapsarianism. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.Google Scholar

Beeley, C. A., The Unity of Christ: Continuity and Conflict in Patristic Tradition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Begheyn, P., ‘The Catechism (1555) of Peter Canisius, the Most Published Book by a Dutch Author in History’, Quaerendo 36 (2006), 51–84.Google Scholar

Beintker, M., Rechtfertigung in der neuzeitlichen Lebenswelt: Theologische Erkundungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.Google Scholar

Beisser, F., Schleiermachers Lehre von Gott. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar

Bejczy, I. P., The Cardinal Virtues in the Middle Ages: A Study in Moral Thought from the Fourth to the Fourteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Bell, R. H., No One Seeks for God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 1.18–3.20. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.Google Scholar

Beltrán de Heredia, V., ‘Controversia de certitudine gratiae entre Domingo de Soto y Ambrosio Catarino’, Ciencia Tomista 62 (1941), 33–62.Google Scholar

Berge, K., ‘Sedaqa and the Community of the Scribes in Post-Exilic Deuteronomy: A Didactical Perspective’, in Gillmayr-Bucher, S. and Häusl, M., eds, Sedaqa and Torah in Postexilic Discourse. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017, 19–36.Google Scholar

Bermon, P., ‘La Lectura sur les deux premiers livres des Sentences de Grégoire de Rimini O.E.S.A. (1300‒1358)’, in Evans, G. R., ed., Medieval Commentaries on Peter Lombard’s Sentences. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001, vol. 1, 267–85.Google Scholar

Bataillon, M., Érasme et l’Espagne. Paris: Droz, 1937.Google Scholar

Betts, C. J., Early Deism in France: From the So-Called ‘Déistes’ of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire’s ‘Lettres Philosophiques’ (1734). The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.Google Scholar

Betz, O., ‘Rechtfertigung in Qumran’, in Betz, O., ed., Jesus: Der Messias Israels: Aufsätze zur biblischen Theologie. Tübingen: Mohr, 1976, 39–58.Google Scholar

Beumer, J., ‘Gratia supponit naturam: Zur Geschichte eines theologischen Prinzips’, Gregorianum 20 (1939), 381–406, 535–52.Google Scholar

Beumer, J., ‘Zwei “Vermittlungstheologen” der Reformationszeit: Philipp Melanchthon und Georg Witzel’, ThPh 43 (1968), 502–22.Google Scholar

Beutel, A., Gerhard Ebeling: Eine Biographie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Biechler, J. E., ‘Gabriel Biel on “liberum arbitrium”’, The Thomist 34 (1970), 114–27.Google Scholar

Bierma, L. D., German Calvinism in the Confessional Age: The Covenant Theology of Caspar Olevianus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1997.Google Scholar

Bierma, L. D., ‘Law and Grace in Ursinus’ Doctrine of the Natural Covenant: A Reappraisal’, in Trueman, C. R. and Clark, R. S., eds, Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999, 96–110.Google Scholar

Biersack, M., ‘The Adoption of Humanism in Catholic Spain (1470–1520)’, RRR 21 (2019), 27–46.Google Scholar

Billings, J. T., Calvin, Participation, and the Gift: The Activity of Believers in Union with Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Bird, M. F., The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul, Justification, and the New Perspective. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2007.Google Scholar

Bird, M. F., and Dodson, J. R., eds, Paul and the Second Century. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Bireley, R., ‘The Religious Movements of the Sixteenth Century as Responses to a Changing World’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 29–48.Google Scholar

Bizer, E., Theologie der Verheissung: Studien zur theologische Entwicklung des jungen Melanchthon 1519–1524. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar

Bizer, E., Fides ex auditu: Eine Untersuchung über die Entdeckung der Gerechtigkeit Gottes durch Martin Luther. 3rd edn. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1966.Google Scholar

Black, C. F., ‘The Council of Trent and Bases for Continuing Reform’, in Church, Religion, and Society in Early Modern Italy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 19–36.Google Scholar

Blackwell, B. C., Christosis: Pauline Soteriology in Light of Deification in Irenaeus and Cyril of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar

Blomme, R., La Doctrine de la peché dans les écoles théologiques de la première moitié du XIIe siècle. Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain, 1958.Google Scholar

Blowers, P., The Drama of the Divine Economy: Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bluhm, H., ‘Bedeutung und Eigenart von Luthers Septembertestament: Eine Analyse von Römer iii. 19–31’, LuJ 39 (1972), 55–79.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, M., ‘Wright’s Paul in a Cloud of (Other) Witnesses’, JSPL 4 (2014), 59–70.Google Scholar

Boersma, H., ‘Calvin and the Extent of the Atonement’, EvQ 64 (1992), 333–55.Google Scholar

Boersma, H., A Hot Pepper Corn: Richard Baxter’s Doctrine of Justification in Its Seventeenth-Century Context of Controversy. Zoetermeer: Uitgevererij Boekencentrum, 1993.Google Scholar

Böhl, E., Von der Rechtfertigung durch den Glauben: Ein Beitrag zur Rettung des protestantischen Kardinaldogmas. Amsterdam: Scheffer, 1890.Google Scholar

Boisset, J., ‘Justification et sanctification chez Calvin’, in Neusner, W. H., ed., Calvinus Theologus: Die Referate des Congrés Européen de recherches Calviniennes. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1976, 131–48.Google Scholar

Bonner, A., The Myth of Pelagianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Bonner, G., ‘Pelagianism and Augustine’, AugSt 23 (1992), 33–51.Google Scholar

Borghino, A., La nuova alleanza in Is 54: analisi esegetico-teologica. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2005.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, H., ‘Iustitia Dei in der Scholastik und bei Luther’, ARG 39 (1942), 1–46.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, H., ‘Humanismus und Reform im Menschenbild Melanchthons’, in Das Jahrhundert der Reformation. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961, 69–87.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, H., ‘Zur Frage der Iustitia Dei beim jungen Luther’, ARG 52 (1961), 16–29; 53 (1962), 1–60.Google Scholar

Boss, G., Die Rechtfertigungslehre in den Bibelkommentaren des Kornelius a Lapide. Münster: Aschendorff, 1962.Google Scholar

Boucaud, P., ‘Raban Maur (ca. 780‒856), commentateur de I Corinthiens’, in Depreux, P., Lebecq, S., Perrin, M. and Szerwiniack, O., eds, Raban Maur et son temps. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010, 305–23.Google Scholar

Boucaud, P., ‘The Corpus Paulinum: Greek and Latin Exegesis of the Epistles in the First Millennium’, RHR 230 (2013), 299–332.Google Scholar

Bougerol, J.-G., ‘The Church Fathers and the Sentences of Peter Lombard’, in Backus, I., ed., The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1997, vol. 1, 113–64.Google Scholar

Bouillard, H., Conversion et grâce chez S. Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Aubier Editions Montaigne, 1944.Google Scholar

Boureau, A., ‘L’usage des textes patristiques dans les controverses scolastiques’, RSPhTh 91 (2007), 39–49.Google Scholar

Bouwsma, W. J., ‘Calvinism as a Renaissance Artifact’, in George, T., ed., John Calvin and the Church: A Prism of Reform. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1990, 28–41.Google Scholar

Bovati, P. Ristabilire la giustizia: Procedure, vocabolario, orientamenti. 2nd edn. Rome: Gregorian University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Boysen, K. H., Christus und sein dreifaches Amt: Multiperspektivische Annäherungen an eine zentrale Figur christologischen Denkens. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar

Bozeman, T. D., ‘Federal Theology and the “National Covenant”: An Elizabethan Case Study’, ChH 61 (1992), 394–407.Google Scholar

Braaten, C. E., Justification: The Article by Which the Church Stands or Falls. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Braaten, C. E., and Jenson, R. W., eds., Union with Christ: The New Finnish Interpretation of Luther. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Bradley, D. J. M., Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brady, I., ‘The Distinctions of the Lombard’s Book of Sentences and Alexander of Hales’, FrS 25 (1965), 90–116.Google Scholar

Brakke, D., The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Brancatelli, R. J., ‘“Beset on Every Side”: Reimagining the Ideology of the Roman Catechism (1566)’, in Bulman, R. F. and Parrella, F. J., eds, From Trent to Vatican II: Historical and Theological Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 283–99.Google Scholar

Braunisch, R., Die Theologie der Rechtfertigung im ‘Enchiridion’ (1538) des Johannes Gropper: Sein kritischer Dialog mit Philipp Melanchthon. Münster: Aschendorff, 1974.Google Scholar

Brecht, M., ‘Probleme der Pietismusforschung’, DRChH 76 (1997), 227–37.Google Scholar

Briskina, A., Philipp Melanchthon und Andreas Osiander im Ringen um die Rechtfertigungslehre: Ein Reformatorischer Streit aus der Ostkirchlichen Perspektive. New York: Peter Lang, 2006.Google Scholar

Brockway, R. W., A Wonderful Work of God: Puritanism and the Great Awakening. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Brown, P., ‘Pelagius and His Supporters: Aims and Environment’, JThS 19 (1968), 93–114.Google Scholar

Brown, P., ‘The Patrons of Pelagius: The Roman Aristocracy between East and West’, JThS 21 (1970), 56–72.Google Scholar

Brown, P., Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bruch, R., ‘Die Urgerechtigkeit als Rechtheit des Willens nach der Lehre des hl. Bonaventuras’, FS 33 (1951), 180–206.Google Scholar

Brundin, A., Vittoria Colonna and the Spiritual Poetics of the Italian Reformation. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Brundin, A., and Treherne, M., eds, Forms of Faith in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Brunner, E., Ein offenes Wort: Vorträge und Aufsätze 1917‒1934. 2 vols. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar

Brunner, H., ‘Die Gerechtigkeit Gottes’, ZRGG 39 (1987), 269–79.Google Scholar

Brunner, P., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre des Konzils von Trient’, in Pro veritate: Eine theologischer Dialog. Münster: Kassel, 1963, 59–96.Google Scholar

Brydon, M., The Evolving Reputation of Richard Hooker: An Examination of Responses, 1600–1714. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bubenheimer, U., Consonantia Theologiae et Iurisprudentiae: Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt als Theologe und Jurist zwischen Scholastik und Reformation. Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V., ‘Die Definition der Gerechtigkeit bei Laktanz und seinen Vorgängern’, VigChr 33 (1979), 356–74.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R., ‘The Primitive Christian Kerygma and the Historical Jesus’, in Braaten, C. E. and Harrisville, R. A., eds, The Historical Jesus and the Kerygmatic Christ; Essays on the New Quest of the Historical Jesus. New York: Abingdon Press, 1964, 15–42.Google Scholar

Bultmann, R., ‘Die Krisis des Glaubens’, in Glauben und Verstehen. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Tübingen: Mohr, 1965, vol. 2, 1–19.Google Scholar

Burger, C. P., ‘Das auxilium speciale Dei in der Gnadenlehre Gregors von Rimini’, in Oberman, H. A., ed., Gregor von Rimini: Werk und Wirkung bis zur Reformation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1981, 195–240.Google Scholar

Burk, D., 2012. ‘The Righteousness of God (Dikaiosune Theou) and Verbal Genitives: A Grammatical Clarification’, JSNT 34 (2012), 346–60.Google Scholar

Burnaby, J., Amor Dei: A Study of the Religion of St. Augustine. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1947.Google Scholar

Burson, J. D., The Rise and Fall of Theological Enlightenment: Jean-Martin de Prades and Ideological Polarization in Eighteenth-Century France. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Burstein, M. E., Victorian Reformations: Historical Fiction and Religious Controversy, 1820–1900. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Burton, S. J. G., The Hallowing of Logic: The Trinitarian Method of Richard Baxter’s Methodus Theologiae. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Buschart, D., and Eilers, K., Theology as Retrieval: Receiving the Past, Renewing the Church. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Butin, P. W., Revelation, Redemption, and Response: Calvin’s Trinitarian Understanding of the Divine–Human Relationship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Buuck, F., ‘Zum Rechtfertigungsdekret’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Wirken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 117–43.Google Scholar

Bynum Walker, C., ‘The Power in the Blood: Sacrifice, Satisfaction, and Substitution in Late Medieval Soteriology’, in Davis, S. T., Kendall, D. and O’Collins, G., eds, The Redemption: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on Christ as Redeemer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 177–204.Google Scholar

Bynum Walker, C., Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Byrne, B., ‘Interpreting Romans Theologically in a Post-“New Perspective” Perspective’, HThR 94 (2001), 227–41.Google Scholar

Caldwell, R. W., Communion in the Spirit: The Holy Spirit as the Bond of Union in the Theology of Jonathan Edwards. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2007.Google Scholar

Cameron, E., ‘The Possibilities and Limits of Conciliation: Philipp Melanchthon and Interconfessional Dialogue in the Sixteenth Century’, in Louthan, H. P. and Zachman, R. C., eds, Conciliation and Confession: The Struggle for Unity in the Age of Reform, 1415–1648. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004, 73–88.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., The Quest for Paul’s Gospel: A Suggested Strategy. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘Christ and the Church in Paul: A “Post-New Perspective” Account’, in Bird, M. F., ed., Four Views on the Apostle Paul. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012, 113–43.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., ‘The Current Crisis: The Capture of Paul’s Gospel by Methodological Arianism’, in Tilling, C., ed., Beyond Old and New Perspectives on Paul. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014, 37–48.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. A., Framing Paul: An Epistolary Biography. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar

Campbell, T. A., The Religion of the Heart. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Campbell, T. A., ‘The Shape of Wesleyan Thought: The Question of John Wesley’s “Essential” Christian Doctrines’, Asbury Theological Review 59 (2004), 27–48.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. S., Hawkins, P. S. and Schildgen, B. D., eds, Medieval Readings of Romans. New York: T&T Clark International, 2007.Google Scholar

Campi, E., ‘The Council of Trent and the Magisterial Reformers’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 277–309.Google Scholar

Capánaga, V., ‘La deificación en la soteriología agustiniana’, in Augustinus Magister. 3 vols. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1954, vol. 2, 745–54.Google Scholar

Capéran, L., Le problème du salut des infidèles. 2 vols. Toulouse: Grand Séminaire, 1934.Google Scholar

Carleton Paget, J., and Lieu, J., eds, Christianity in the Second Century: Themes and Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Carman, T., Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. J., ‘Disenchantment, Rationality, and the Modernity of Max Weber’, Forum Philosophicum 16 (2011), 117–37.Google Scholar

Cary, P., Inner Grace: Augustine in the Traditions of Plato and Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cassese, M., ‘Girolamo Seripando, il concilio di Trento e la riforma della chiesa’, in Cestaro, A., ed., Geronimo Seripando e la chiesa del suo tempo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteraturam, 1997, 189–225.Google Scholar

Cassidy, J. J., ‘T. F. Torrance’s Realistic Soteriological Objectivism and the Elimination of Dualisms: Union with Christ in Current Perspective’, MJT 19 (2008), 164–94.Google Scholar

Casteel, T. W., ‘Calvin and Trent: Calvin’s Reaction to the Council of Trent in the Context of His Conciliar Thought’, HThR 63 (1970), 91–117.Google Scholar

Celenza, C. S., ‘Renaissance Humanism and the New Testament: Lorenzo Valla’s Annotations to the Vulgate’, JMRS 24 (1994), 33–52.Google Scholar

Celsor, S. A., Word and Faith in the Formation of Christian Personhood Coram Deo: Gerhard Ebeling’s Rejection of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H., ‘The Lectures on Justification’, in Merrigan, T. and Kerr, I., eds, Newman after a Hundred Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 287–307.Google Scholar

Chalamet, C., Dialectical Theologians: Wilhelm Herrmann, Karl Barth and Rudolf Bultmann. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar

Chalamet, C., ‘La Première Guerre mondiale et la mise en crise de la théologie protestante germanophone et francophone’, RSR 105 (2017), 557–75.Google Scholar

Champagne, M. T., ‘Christian Hebraism in Twelfth-Century Rome: A Philologist’s Correction of the Latin Bible through Dialogue with Jewish Scholars and Their Hebrew Texts’, SCH 53 (2017), 71–87.Google Scholar

Champion, J., The Pillars of Priestcraft Shaken: The Church of England and Its Enemies 1660–1730. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Chantraine, G., ‘Mystère’ et ‘Philosophie du Christ’ selon Erasme. Gembloux: Editions Duculot, 1971.Google Scholar

Chappel, J., Catholic Modern: The Challenge of Totalitarianism and the Remaking of the Church. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Chazelle, C. M., and Edwards, B. V. N., eds, The Study of the Bible in the Carolingian Era. Turnhout: Brepols, 2003.Google Scholar

Chéné, J., ‘Que significiaient “initium fidei” et “affectus credulitatis” pour les semipélagiens?’, RSR 35 (1948), 566–88.Google Scholar

Chéné, J., ‘Le Semipélagianisme du Midi et de la Gaule d’après les lettres de Prosper d’Aquitaine et d’Hilaire à Saint Augustin’, RSR 43 (1955), 321–41.Google Scholar

Chenu, M.-D., La théologie comme science au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Librarie Philosophie J. Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar

Chester, S. J., Conversion at Corinth: Perspectives on Conversion in Paul’s Theology and the Corinthian Church. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Chester, S. J., Reading Paul with the Reformers: Reconciling Old and New Perspectives. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar

Choudhury, M., and Watkins, D. J., eds, Belief and Politics in Enlightenment France: Essays in Honor of Dale K. van Kley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Christ, C., ‘Das Schriftverständnis von Zwingli und Erasmus im Jahre 1522’, Zwingliana 16 (1983), 111–25.Google Scholar

Christensen, M. J., and Wittung, J. A., eds, Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Christes, J., ‘Christliche und heidnisch-römische Gerechtigkeit in Augustins Werk “De Civitate Dei”’, RhM 123 (1980), 163–77.Google Scholar

Cipriani, N., ‘Agostino lettore dei commentari paolini di Mario Vittorino’, Augustinianum 38 (1998), 413–28.Google Scholar

Clapper, G. S., John Wesley on Religious Affections: His Views on Experience and Emotion and Their Role in the Christian Life and Theology. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Clark, E. A., The Origenist Controversy: The Cultural Construction of an Early Christian Debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Clark, J., ‘Providence, Predestination and Progress: or, Did the Enlightenment Fail?’, Albion 35 (2003), 559–89.Google Scholar

Clark, M., ‘Augustine on Justice’, REAug 9 (1963), 87‒94.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Iustitia Imputata Christi: Alien or Proper to Luther’s Doctrine of Justication?’, EvQ 70 (2006) 269–310.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Christ and Covenant: Federal Theology in Reformed Orthodoxy’, in Selderhuis, H., ed., A Companion to Reformed Orthodoxy. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 403–28.Google Scholar

Clifford, A. C., ‘Justification: The Calvin–Saumur perspective’, EvQ 79 (2007), 331–48.Google Scholar

Cloes, H., ‘La systématization théologique pendant la première moitié du XII^e siècle’, EThL 34 (1958), 277–329.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., ‘The Mystery of Israel’s Salvation: Romans 11:25–26 in Patristic and Medieval Exegesis’, HThR 98 (2005), 247–8.Google Scholar

Colish, M., ‘The Sentence Collection and the Education of Professional Theologians in the Twelfth Century’, in van Deusen, N., ed., The Intellectual Climate of the Early University. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 1997, 1–26.Google Scholar

Colish, M., ‘Systematic Theology and Theological Research in the Twelfth Century’, JMRS 18 (1988), 135–56.Google Scholar

Collins, K. J., ‘John Wesley’s Doctrine of the New Birth’, Wesleyan Theological Journal 32 (1997), 53–68.Google Scholar

Collins, K. J., John Wesley: A Theological Journey. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2003.Google Scholar

Collinson, P., ‘The Fog in the Channel Clears: The Rediscovery of the Continental Dimension to the British Reformations’, in Ha, P. and Collinson, P., eds, The Reception of Continental Reformation in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, xxvii–xxxvii.Google Scholar

Cololeu, A., ‘On the Reception of Erasmus’s Latin Version of the New Testament in Sixteenth-Century Spain’, Bible Translator 67 (2016), 56–68.Google Scholar

Colson, C., and Neuhaus, R. J., eds, Evangelicals and Catholics Together: Toward a Common Mission. Dallas, TX: Word, 1995.Google Scholar

Colzani, G., ‘La nozione di “giustificazione”: Il senso del suo impiego nei dibattiti tridentini, la verifica di un modello di comprensione’, in Ancona, G., ed., La giustificazione: Atti del VII Corso di Aggiornamento tenutosi a Roma nei giorni 2‒4 gennaio 1997. Padua: Il Messaggero, 65–111.Google Scholar

Como, D., ‘Predestination and Political Conflict in Laud’s London’, HJ 46 (2003), 263–94.Google Scholar

Condonier, V., and Steel, C., ‘Guillaume de Moerbeke Traducteur du Liber de Bona Fortuna et de l’Éthique à Eudème’, in van Oppenraaij, A. M. I. and Fontaine, R., eds, The Letter before the Spirit: The Importance of Text Editions for the Study of the Reception of Aristotle. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 401–46.Google Scholar

Congdon, D. W., The Mission of Demythologizing: Rudolf Bultmann’s Dialectical Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Conkling, M., ‘Pietism on the American Landscape’, ConJ 41(2015), 220–35.Google Scholar

Connolly, H., Irish Penitentials and Their Significance for the Sacrament of Penance Today. Dublin: Four Courts, 1995.Google Scholar

Constas, M., ‘The Reception of Paul and Pauline Theology in the Byzantine Period’, in Krueger, D. and Nelson, R. S., eds, The New Testament in Byzantium. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, 2016, 147–76.Google Scholar

Constas, N. P., ‘The Last Temptation of Satan: Divine Deception in Greek Patristic Interpretations of the Passion Narrative’, HThR 97 (2004), 139–63.Google Scholar

Coogan, R., Erasmus, Lee and the Correction of the Vulgate: The Shaking of the Foundations. Geneva: Droz, 1992.Google Scholar

Cooper, A. G., The Body in St Maximus the Confessor: Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cooper, J., The Righteousness of One: An Evaluation of Early Patristic Soteriology in Light of the New Perspective on Paul. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2013.Google Scholar

Cooper, T. ‘Why Did Richard Baxter and John Owen Diverge? The Impact of the First Civil War’, JEH 61 (2010), 496–516.Google Scholar

Coors, M., Scriptura efficax: Die biblisch-dogmatische Grundlegung des theologischen Systems bei Johann Andreas Quenstedt. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar

Cornwall, R. D., ‘The Search for the Primitive Church: The Use of Early Church Fathers in the High Church Anglican Tradition, 1680–1745’, AEH 59 (1990), 303–29.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, C. H., ‘Justification in Paul: A Linguistic and Theological Reflection’, JBL 106 (1987), 653–70.Google Scholar

Cottret, B., ‘Rousseau était-il protestant? Péché, justification et Écriture selon Jean-Jacques’, ETR 90 (2015), 563–80.Google Scholar

Couenhoven, J., Stricken by Sin, Cured by Christ: Agency, Necessity, and Culpability in Augustinian Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P., Recherches sur les Confessions de Saint Augustin. Paris: Boccard, 1950.Google Scholar

Courtenay, W. J., ‘Covenant and Causality in Pierre d’Ailly’, Speculum 46 (1971), 94–119.Google Scholar

Courtenay, W. J., ‘The King and the Leaden Coin: The Economic Background of Sine Qua Non Causality’, Traditio 28 (1972), 185–209.Google Scholar

Courtenay, W. J., ‘Token Coinage and the Administration of Poor Relief during the Late Middle Ages’, JIH 3 (1972–3), 275–95.Google Scholar

Courtenay, W. J., Adam Wodeham: An Introduction to His Life and Writings. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar

Courtenay, W. J., ‘The Dialectic of Divine Omnipotence in the Age of Chaucer: A Reconsideration’, in Keiper, H., Bode, C. and Utz, R. J., eds, Critical Studies. Nominalism and Literary Discourse. New Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997, 111–21Google Scholar

Courtney, F., Cardinal Robert Pullen: An English Theologian of the Twelfth Century. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1954.Google Scholar

Coyle, K. J., ‘Saint Augustine’s Manichean Legacy’, AugSt 34 (2003), 1–22.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. R., ‘Ammonius of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea and the Origins of Gospels Scholarship’, NTS 61 (2015), 1–29.Google Scholar

Creach, J., ‘The Destiny of the Righteous in the Theology of the Psalms’, in Jacobson, R. A., ed., Soundings in the Theology of the Psalms: Perspectives and Methods in Contemporary Scholarship. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2011, 49–61.Google Scholar

Cremer, H., Die paulinische Rechtfertigungslehre im Zusammenhange ihrer geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1899.Google Scholar

Crisp, O., ‘Retrieving Zwingli’s Doctrine of Original Sin’, JRefTh 10 (2016), 340–60.Google Scholar

Cross, R. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Cross, R. ‘Aquinas on Physical Impairment: Human Nature and Original Sin’, HThR 110 (2017), 317–38.Google Scholar

Crouter, R., Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005,Google Scholar

Cullen, C. M., Bonaventure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cullmann, O., ‘The Plurality of the Gospels as a Theological Problem in Antiquity’, in Higgins, A. J. B., ed., The Early Church: Studies in Early Christian History and Theology. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1956, 37–54.Google Scholar

Cummings, B. ‘Justifying God in Tyndale’s English’, Reformation 2 (1997), 143–72.Google Scholar

Dahl, N. A., ‘The Particularity of the Pauline Epistles as a Problem in the Ancient Church’, in van Unnik, W. C., ed., Eine Freundesgabe Herrn Professor Dr. Oscar Cullmann zu seinem 60. Geburtstag überreicht. Leiden: Brill, 1962, 261–71.Google Scholar

Dalmau, J. M., ‘La teología de la disposición a la justificación en visperas de la revolución protestante’, RET 6 (1946), 249–75.Google Scholar

Daniell, D., William Tyndale: A Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Dassmann, E., ‘Zum Paulusverständnis in der östliche Kirche’, JbAC 29 (1986), 27–39.Google Scholar

Daston, L. J., ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, SSS 22 (1992), 597–618.Google Scholar

Davids, E. A., Das Bild vom neuen Menschen: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Corpus Macarianum. Salzburg: Pustet, 1968.Google Scholar

Davies, W. D., Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Davis, J. F., ‘Lollardy and the Reformation in England’, ARG 73 (1982), 217–37.Google Scholar

De Boer, M. C., ‘N. T. Wright’s Great Story and Its Relationship to Paul’s Gospel’, JSPL 4 (2014), 49–58.Google Scholar

De Bruyn, T., ‘Ambrosiaster’s Revisions of His Commentary on Romans and Roman Synodal Statements about the Holy Spirit’, REAug 56 (2010), 45–68.Google Scholar

De Campos, H. C., Doctrine in Development: Johannes Piscator and Debates over Christ’s Active Obedience. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2017.Google Scholar

De Clerck, D. E., ‘Droits du démon et nécessité de la rédemption: Les écoles d’Abélard et de Pierre Lombard’, RThAM 14 (1947), 32–64.Google Scholar

De Frede, C., ‘La diffusione delle idee riformate nel Mezzogiornod’Italia: una premessa metodologica e un episodio concernente Girolamo Seripando’, in Cestaro, A., ed., Geronimo Seripando e la chiesa del suo tempo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteraturam, 1997, 105–17.Google Scholar

De Kroon, M., ‘Pseudo-Augustin im Mittelalter: Entwurf eines Forschungsberichts’, Augustiniana 22 (1972), 511–30.Google Scholar

De Lubac, H., Surnaturel: Etude historique. Paris: Aubier, 1946.Google Scholar

De Roo, J. C. R., ‘The Concept of “Works of the Law” in Jewish and Christian Literature’, in Potter, S. E. and Pearson, B. W. R., eds, Christian–Jewish Relations through the Centuries. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000, 116–47.Google Scholar

De Roo, J. C. R., Works of the Law at Qumran and in Paul. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2006.Google Scholar

De Villalmonte, A., ‘Andrés de Vega y el proceso de la justificación según el Concilio Tridentina’, RET 5 (1945), 311–74.Google Scholar

De Vogel, C. J., ‘Erasmus and His Attitude toward Church Dogma’, in Coppens, J., ed., Scrinium Erasmianum. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1969, vol. 2, 101–32.Google Scholar

De Vooght, P., ‘A propos de la grâce actuelle dans la théologie de Saint Thomas’, Divus Thomas (Piacenza) 31 (1928), 386–416.Google Scholar

Delgado, T., Doody, J. and Paffenroth, K., eds, Augustine and Social Justice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2015.Google Scholar

Delius, H.-U., Augustin als Quelle Luthers: Eine Materialsammlung. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1984.Google Scholar

Delumeau, J., Sin and Fear: The Emergence of a Western Guilt Culture, 13th–18th Centuries. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Demmer, K., Ius Caritatis: Zur christologischen Grundlegung der augustinischen Naturrechtslehre. Rome: Libreria editrice dell’Università Gregoriana, 1961.Google Scholar

Denifle, H., Luther und Luthertum in der ersten Entwickelung, quellenmäßig dargestell. 2 vols. Mainz: Kirchheim, 1904, especially 392–5, 404–15.Google Scholar

Denifle, H., Die abendländischen Schriftausleger bis Luther über Iustitia Dei (Röm. 1.17) und Iustificatio. Mainz: Kircheim, 1905.Google Scholar

Dettloff, W., Die Lehre von der acceptatio divina bei Johannes Duns Scotus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtfertigungslehre. Werl: Dietrich Coelde Verlag, 1954.Google Scholar

Dettloff, W., Die Entwicklung der Akzeptations- und Verdienstlehre von Duns Scotus bis Luther mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Franziskanertheologen. Münster Aschendorff, 1963.Google Scholar

Dettloff, W., ‘Die antipelagianische Grundstruktur des scotischen Rechtfertigungslehre’, FS 48 (1966), 267–70.Google Scholar

Dessain, C. S., ‘Cardinal Newman and the Eastern Tradition’, DR 94 (1976), 83–98.Google Scholar

Deuper, C., Johannes Calvins ‘Antidotum’ gegen das Rechtfertigungsdekret des Trienter Konzils (1547). Munich: GRIN Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar

Dhont, R.-C., Le problème de la préparation à la grâce: débuts de l’école franciscaine. Paris: Editions Franciscaines, 1946.Google Scholar

Diego, L., Scripture and Deism: The Biblical Criticism of the Eighteenth-Century British Deists. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar

Diem, H., ‘Christologie und Rechtfertigung bei Karl Barth’, EvTh 23 (1963), 197–213.Google Scholar

Diestel, L. ‘Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit, vorzüglich im Alten Testament, biblisch-theologisch dargestellt’, Jahrbücher für deutsche Theologie 5 (1860), 173–253.Google Scholar

Dieter, T., Der junge Luther und Aristoteles: Eine historisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von Theologie und Philosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2001.Google Scholar

Dieter, T., ‘Dalla “Dichiarazione congiunta sulla dottrina della giustificazione” verso una visione comune della apostolicità della chiesa nel dialogo luterano-cattolico’, Studi ecumenici 31 (2013), 61–74.Google Scholar

Dixon, C. S., ‘Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses and the Origins of the Reformation Narrative’, EHR 132 (2017), 533–69.Google Scholar

Dodaro, R., Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Dodds, G. D., Exploiting Erasmus: The Erasmian Legacy and Religious Change in Early Modern England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dole, A., Schleiermacher on Religion and the Natural Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Doms, H., Die Gnadenlehre des sel. Albertus Magnus. Breslau: Müller & Seiffert, 1929.Google Scholar

Donfried, K., ‘Justification and Last Judgement in Paul’, ZNW 67 (1976), 90–110.Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. P., Calvinism and Scholasticism in Vermigli’s Doctrine of Man and Grace. Leiden: Brill, 1976.Google Scholar

Douglass, E. J. D., Justification in Late Medieval Preaching: A Study of John Geiler of Strassburg. Leiden: Brill, 1966.Google Scholar

Drecoll, V. H., Die Entstehung der Gnadenlehre Augustins. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar

Du Toit, A. B., ‘Forensic Metaphors in Romans and Their Soteriological Significance’, in Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 213–46.Google Scholar

Dufays, J.-M., ‘La place du concept de “moyen-âge” dans l’historiographie’, Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 65 (1987), 257–73.Google Scholar

Duffy, E., The Voices of Morebath: Reformation and Rebellion in an English Village. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Dunn, G. D., ‘Augustine, Cyril of Alexandria, and the Pelagian Controversy’, AugSt 37 (2006), 63–88.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., ‘The New Perspective on Paul’, BJRL 65 (1983), 95–122.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., ‘The Justice of God: A Renewed Perspective on Justification by Faith’, JThS 43 (1992), 1–22.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., Jesus, Paul and the Law. London: SPCK, 1995.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., The New Perspective on Paul. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G., Neither Jew nor Greek: A Contested Identity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Dunne, J. A., and Lewellen, E., eds, One God, One People, One Future: Essays in Honour of N. T. Wright. London: SPCK, 2018.Google Scholar

Dupont, A., ‘Die Christusfigur des Pelagius: Rekonstruktion der Christologie im Kommentar von Pelagius zum Römerbrief des Paulus’, Augustiniana 56 (2006), 321–72.Google Scholar

Dupré, L. K., The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Duval, Y.-M., ‘La date de “De natura” de Pélage: les prèmieres étapes de la controverse sur la nature de la grâce’, REAug 36 (1990), 257–83.Google Scholar

Eaton, M., ‘Toward an Anabaptist Covenantal Soteriology: A Dialogue with Balthasar Hubmaier and Contemporary Pauline Scholarship’, MQR 84 (2010), 67–93.Google Scholar

Ebach, J., ‘Barmherzigkeit und Gerechtigkeit: Biblische Beobachtungen und Impressionen’, Theologisch-praktische Quartalschrift 16 (2016), 339–47.Google Scholar

Ebeling, G., Kirchengeschichte als Geschichte der Auslegung der Heiligen Schrift. Tübingen: Mohr, 1947.Google Scholar

Ebeling, G. ‘Die Anfänge von Luthers Hermeneutik’, in Lutherstudien I. Tübingen: Mohr, 1971, 1–68Google Scholar

Ebeling, G. ‘Karl Barths Ringen mit Luther’, in Luther Studien III. Tübingen: Mohr, 1985, 428–573.Google Scholar

Eckholt, M., and Schweitzer, F., ‘Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der Rechtfertigungsbotschaft für Religionspädagogik und kirchliche Bildungsarbeit’, RpB 52 (2004), 79–90.Google Scholar

Edelstein, D., ed., The Super-Enlightenment: Daring to Know Too Much. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2010.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J., ‘Justin’s Logos and the Word of God’, JECS 3 (1995), 261–80.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. J., ed., Visions of God and Ideas on Deification in Patristic Thought. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Ehrle, F., Der Sentenzenkommentar Peters von Candia des Pisanerpapstes Alexander V. Münster: Aschendorff, 1925.Google Scholar

Ehrman, B., The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2018.Google Scholar

Elert, W., Der Kampf um das Christentum: Geschichte der Beziehungen zwischen dem evangelischen Christentum in Deutschland und dem allgemeinen Denken seit Schleiermacher und Hegel. Munich: Beck, 1921.Google Scholar

English, J. C., ‘The Path to Perfection in Pseudo-Macarius and John Wesley’, Pacifica 11 (1998), 54–62.Google Scholar

Eno, R. B., ‘Some Patristic Views on the Relationship of Faith and Works in Justification’, RechAug 19 (1984), 3–27.Google Scholar

Ernst, W., Gott und Mensch am Vorabend der Reformation: Eine Untersuchung zur Moralphilosophie und -theologie bei Gabriel Biel. Leipzig: St Benno-Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Esteban-Segura, L. 2014. ‘Translating and Glossing Nouns in the Old English Gospels: A Contrastive Study’, Nordic Journal of English Studies 13 (2014), 33–52.Google Scholar

Ettenhuber, K., Donne’s Augustine: Renaissance Cultures of Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Etzkorn, G., ‘Walter Chatton and the Controversy on the Absolute Necessity of Grace’, FS 37 (1977), 32–65.Google Scholar

Eugenio, D. O., Communion with the Triune God: The Trinitarian Soteriology of T. F. Torrance. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2015.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. ‘The Borrowed Meaning: Grammar, Logic and the Problems of Theological Language in Twelfth-Century Schools’, DR 96 (1978), 165–75.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. Old Arts and New Theology: The Beginnings of Theology as an Academic Discipline. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. ‘Peter the Chanter’s De Tropis Loquendi: The Problem of the Text’, New Scholasticism 55 (1981), 95–103.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. Augustine on Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Evans, G. R. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Fabian, B., Selecta Anglicana: Buchgeschichtliche Studien zur Aufnahme der englischen Literatur in Deutschland im achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994.Google Scholar

Fairbairn, D., ‘Patristic Soteriology: Three Trajectories’, JETS 50 (2007), 289–310.Google Scholar

Falluomini, C., ‘The Gothic Version of the New Testament’, in Ehrman, B. D. and Holmes, M. W., eds, The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 329–50.Google Scholar

Farge, J. K., Orthodoxy and Reform in Early Reformation France: The Faculty of Theology of Paris, 1500–1543. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar

Farthing, J. L., Thomas Aquinas and Gabriel Biel: Interpretations of St. Thomas Aquinas in German Nominalism on the Eve of the Reformation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Faulenbach, H., Die Struktur der Theologie des Amandus Polanus von Polansdorf. Zurich: EVZ-Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Feckes, C., Die Rechtfertigungslehre des Gabriel Biel und ihre Stellung innerhalb der nominalistischen Schule. Münster: Aschendorff, 1925.Google Scholar

Fédou, M., ‘L’intérêt du théologien pour le Moyen Âge’, ResSR 100 (2012), 167–86.Google Scholar

Felmberg, B. A. R., Die Ablasstheologie Kardinal Cajetans. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar

Fenlon, D., Heresy and Obedience in Tridentine Italy: Cardinal Pole and the Counter Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Ferguson, R. A., The American Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fesko, J. V., Beyond Calvin: Union with Christ and Justification in Early Modern Reformed Theology (1517–1700). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar

Fesko, J. V., ‘Romans 8:29–30 and the Question of the Ordo Salutis’, JRefTh 8 (2014), 35–60.Google Scholar

Fink, D. C., ‘“The Doers of the Law Will Be Justified”: The Exegetical Origins of Martin Bucer’s Triplex Iustificatio’, JThS 58 (2007), 485–524.Google Scholar

Fink, D. C., ‘Was There a “Reformation Doctrine of Justification”?’, HThR 103 (2010), 205–35.Google Scholar

Fink, D. C., ‘John Mair’s Doctrine of Justification within the Context of the Early Sixteenth Century’, in Slotemaker, J. T. and Witt, J. C., eds, A Companion to the Theology of John Mair. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 223–40.Google Scholar

Finstuen, A. S., Original Sin and Everyday Protestants: The Theology of Reinhold Niebuhr, Billy Graham, and Paul Tillich in an Age of Anxiety. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Firpo, M., Riforma protestante ed eresie nell’Italia del Cinquecento. Rome: Laterza, 1993.Google Scholar

Firpo, M., Juan de Valdés and the Italian Reformation. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Fiume, E., ‘Decretum Dei, solatium ineffabile: il contributo di Girolamo Zanchi (1516–1590) alla dottrina della doppia predestinazione e della perseveranza dei credenti’, BSSV 114 (1997), 67–78.Google Scholar

Flasch, K., Logik des Schreckens: De Diversis Quaestionibus ad Simplicianum 12. 2nd edn. Mainz: Dieterich, 1995.Google Scholar

Flick, M., L’attimo della giustificazione secondo S. Tomasso. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1947.Google Scholar

Flogaus, R., Theosis bei Palamas und Luther: Ein Beitrag zum ökumenischen Gespräch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.Google Scholar

Flogaus, R. ‘Luther versus Melanchthon? Zur Frage der Einheit der Wittenberger Reformation in der Rechtfertigungslehre’, ARG 91 (2000), 6–46.Google Scholar

Flückiger, F., Der Ursprung des christlichen Dogmas: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Albert Schweitzer und Martin Werner. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1955.Google Scholar

Fock, O., Der Socianismus nach seiner Stellung. Kiel, 1847.Google Scholar

Forde, S., ‘Natural Law, Theology, and Morality in Locke’, AJPS 45 (2001), 396–409.Google Scholar

Forster, T. R. V., Eduard Böhl’s (1836‒1903) Concept for a Re-emergence of Reformation Thought. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar

Fox, R. W., ‘The Culture of Liberal Protestant Progressivism, 1875–1925’, JIH 23 (1993), 639–60.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, P., Testimonia Patrum: The Function of the Patristic Argument in the Theology of Philip Melanchthon. Geneva: Droz, 1961.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, P. Einigungsbestrebungen in der Reformationszeit: Zwei Wege ‒ Zwei Motive. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1965.Google Scholar

François, W., ‘Augustinus Sanior Interpres Apostoli: Thomas Stapleton and the Louvain Augustinian School’s Reception of Paul’, in Holder, R. W., ed., A Companion to Paul in the Reformation. Leiden: Brill, 2009, 363–87.Google Scholar

François, W., ‘Augustine and the Golden Age of Biblical Scholarship in Louvain (1550–1650)’, in Gordon, B. and McLean, M., eds, Shaping the Bible in the Reformation: Books, Scholars and Their Readers in the Sixteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 235–89.Google Scholar

François, W., and Gerace, A., ‘Trent and the Latin Vulgate: A Louvain Project?’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 131–74.Google Scholar

Frank, G., and Selderhuis, H. J., eds, Melanchthon und der Calvinismus. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzbog, 2005.Google Scholar

Franklin-Brown, M., Reading the World: Encyclopedic Writing in the Scholastic Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fransen, P., ‘Dogmengeschichtlichen Entfaltung der Gnadenlehre’, in Feiner, J. and Löhrer, M., eds, Mysterium Salutis: Grundriß heilsgeschichtlicher Dogmatik, Einsiedeln: Beinziger, 1973, vol. 4/2, 631–722.Google Scholar

Fredriksen, P., ‘Excaecati Occulta Justitia Dei: Augustine on Jews and Judaism’, JECS 3 (1995), 299–324.Google Scholar

Friedmann, R., The Theology of Anabaptism: An Interpretation. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Friedrich, R., Martin Bucer ‒ Fanatiker der Einheit? Seine Stellungname zu theologischen Fragen seiner Zeit (Abendmals- und Kirchenverständnis) insbesondere nach seinem Briefwechsel der Jahre 1524–1541. Bonn: Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft, 2002.Google Scholar

Froehlich, K., ‘Justification Language in the Middle Ages’, in Anderson, H. G., Murphy, T. A. and Burgess, J. A., eds, Justification by Faith. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press, 1985, 143–61.Google Scholar

Fubini, R., Humanism and Secularization: From Petrarch to Valla. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Fudge, T. A., ‘Icarus of Basel? Oecolampadius and the Early Swiss Reformation’, JRH 21 (1997), 268–84.Google Scholar

Fürst, A., ‘Hieronymus und Augustinus’, in Von Origenes und Hieronymus zu Augustinus: Studien zur antiken Theologiegeschichte. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011, 337–58.Google Scholar

Galles, P., Situation und Botschaft: Die soteriologische Vermittlung von Anthropologie und Christologie in den offenen Denkformen von Paul Tillich und Walter Kasper. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar

Gamper, A., Gott als Richter in Mesopotamien und im Alten Testament: Zum Verständnis einer Gebetsbitte. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner, 1966.Google Scholar

Garcia, M. A., Life in Christ: Union with Christ and Twofold Grace in Calvin’s Theology. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2008.Google Scholar

Garde, J. N., Old English Poetry in Medieval Christian Perspective: A Doctrinal Approach. Cambridge: D. S. Brewster, 1991.Google Scholar

Garde, J. N., and Muir, B. J., ‘Patristic Influence and the Poetic Intention in Old English Religious Verse’, JLTh 2 (1988), 49–68.Google Scholar

Gardner, E. C., Justice and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Garrigou-Lagrange, R., La synthèse Thomiste. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1947.Google Scholar

Gärtner, F., Karl Barth und Zinzendorf: Die bleibende Bedeutung Zinzendorfs auf Grund der Beurteilung des Pietismus durch Karl Barth. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1953.Google Scholar

Gebhardt, R., Heil als Kommunikationsgeschehen: Analysen zu dem in Luthers Rechtfertigungslehre implizierten Wirklichkeitsverständnis. Marburg: Elwert Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar

Gerace, A., and Gielis, G., ‘The Ambiguous Reception of the Doctrine of Duplex Iustitia in Leuven (1544–1556)’, Augustiniana 68 (2018), 91–123.Google Scholar

Ghosh, K., The Wycliffite Heresy: Authority and the Interpretation of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Gibbs, L. W., ‘Richard Hooker’s via Media Doctrine of Justification’, HThR 74 (1991), 211–20.Google Scholar

Gielis, M., ‘Leuven Theologians as Opponents of Erasmus and of Humanistic Theology’, in Rummel, E., ed., A Companion to Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus. Leiden: Brill, 2008, 197–214.Google Scholar

Gillon, B., ‘La grâce incréée chez quelques théologiens du XIV^e siècle’, Divinitas 11 (1967), 671–80.Google Scholar

Gilson, E., ‘Roger Marston, un cas d’Augustinisme avicennisant’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 8 (1952), 37–42.Google Scholar

Girardin, B., Rhétorique et théologique: Calvin, le commentaire de l’epître aux Romains. Paris: Éditions Beauchesne, 1979.Google Scholar

Gleason, E. G., ‘On the Nature of Italian Evangelism: Scholarship, 1953–1978’, SCJ 9 (1978), 3–25.Google Scholar

Gleason, E. G., Gasparo Contarini: Venice, Rome, and Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gmainer-Pranzl, F., Glaube und Geschichte bei Karl Rahner und Gerhard Ebeling: Ein Vergleich transzendentaler und hermeneutischer Theologie. Innsbruck: TyroliaVerlag, 1996.Google Scholar

Goering, D. T., Friedrich Gogarten (1887–1967): Religionsrebell im Jahrhundert der Weltkriege. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Goeters, J. F. G., ‘Zwinglis Werdegang als Erasmianer’, in Greschat, M. and Goeters, J. F. G., eds, Reformation und Humanismus: Robert Stupperich zum 65. Geburtstag. Witten: Luther-Verlag, 1969, 225–71.Google Scholar

Goeters, J. F. G., ‘Der reformierte Pietismus in Deutschland 1650–1690’, in van der Berg, J., ed., Der Pietismus vom siebzehnten bis zum frühen achtzehnten Jahrhundert. Gõttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993, 241–77.Google Scholar

Gogarten, F.‚ ‘Das Problem einer theologischen Anthropologie’, ZZ 7 (1929), 493–511.Google Scholar

Göhler, A., Calvins Lehre von der Heiligung dargestellt auf Grund der Institutio, exegetischer und homiletischer Schriften. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1934.Google Scholar

Goins, S., ‘Jerome’s Psalters’, in Brown, W. P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 185–95.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, G., ‘Semitic Triradicalism and the Biradical Question’, in Kahn, G., ed., Semitic Studies in Honour of Edward Ullendorff. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 9–25.Google Scholar

Gomes, A. W., ‘Reason Run Amok? The Protestant Orthodox Charge of Rationalism against Fausus Socinus’, in Ballor, J. J., Sytsma, D. and Zuidema, J., eds, Church and School in Early Modern Protestantism. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 551–65.Google Scholar

Gonzáles Rivas, S., ‘Los teólogos salmantinos y el decreto de la justificación’, EE 21 (1947), 147–70.Google Scholar

Gordon, B., The Swiss Reformation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Gordon, B., John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion: A Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gorman, M., Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Gorman, M., ‘Justification and Justice in Paul’, JSPL 1 (2011), 23–40.Google Scholar

Gössner, A., ‘Reichspolitik und Religionsgespräche’, in Frank, G. and Lange, A., eds, Philipp Melanchthon: Der Reformator zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017, 97–107.Google Scholar

Goudriaan, A., and van Lieburg, F. A., eds, Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618–1619). Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Gräb-Schmidt, E., ‘Die Bedeutung reformatorischer Einsichten für die ethische Urteilsbildung der Gegenwart’, ZThK 107 (2010), 479–504.Google Scholar

Gräbe, P. J., ‘Salvation in Colossians and Ephesians’, in Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 287–303.Google Scholar

Grabmann, M., Mittelalterliches Geistesleben: Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Scholastik und Mystik. 3 vols. Munich: Hueber, 1926–56.Google Scholar

Grabmann, M., Die Geschichte der scholastischen Methode. 2 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar

Graf, F. W., ‘Ursprüngliches Gefühl unmittelbarer Koinzidenz des Differenten: Zur Modifikation des Religionsbegriffs in der verschiedenen Auflagen von Schleiermachers “Reden über Religion”’, ZThK 75 (1978), 147–86.Google Scholar

Grane, L., Contra Gabrielem: Luthers Auseinandersetzung mit Gabriel Biel in der Disputatio contra scholasticam theologiam 1517. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1962.Google Scholar

Grane, L., ‘Gregor von Rimini und Luthers Leipziger Disputation’, StTh 22 (1968), 29–49.Google Scholar

Grane, L., ‘Augustins “Expositio quarumdam propositionum ex Epistola ad Romanos” in Luthers Römerbriefvorlesung’, ZThK 69 (1972), 304–30.Google Scholar

Grant, R. W., ‘John Locke on Custom’s Power and Reason’s Authority’, Review of Politics 74 (2012), 607–29.Google Scholar

Grass, H., ‘Die durch Jesum von Nazareth vollbrachte Erlösung: Ein Beitrag zur Erlösungslehre Schleiermachers’, in Kaiser, O., ed., Denkender Glaube: Festschrift für Carl Heinz Ratschow. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1976, 152–69.Google Scholar

Green, I. M., The Christian’s ABC: Catechisms and Catechizing in England c. 1530–1740. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Greer, R. A., Christian Hope and Christian Life. New York: Herder, 2001.Google Scholar

Gregory, B. S., The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Greive, W., Die Glaubwürdigkeit des Christentums: Die Theologie Wolfhart Pannenbergs als Herausforderung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.Google Scholar

Greschat, M., Melanchthon neben Luther: Studien zur Gestalt der Rechtfertigungslehre zwischen 1528 und 1537. Witten: Luther-Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar

Greschat, M., ‘Martin Bucers Bücherverzeichnis von 1518’, AKG 57 (1975), 162–85.Google Scholar

Greshake, G., Gnade als konkrete Freiheit: eine Untersuchung zur Gnadenlehre des Pelagius. Mainz: Matthias Grünewald Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J., Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: Futures Past from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Grohmann, M., ‘Diskontinuität und Kontinuität in alttestamentlichen Identitätskonzepten’, in Öhler, M., ed., Religionsgemeinschaft und Identität: Prozesse jüdischer und christlicher Identitätsbildung im Rahmen der Antike. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlagsgesellschaft, 2013, 17–42.Google Scholar

Gross, J., La Divinisation du chrétien d’après les pères grecs. Paris: Gabalda, 1938.Google Scholar

Grözinger, A., ‘Eduard Thurneysen’, in Möller, C., ed., Geschichte der Seelsorge in Einzelporträts. 3 vols. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1996, vol. 3, 277–94.Google Scholar

Guardini, R. Systembildende Elemente in der Theologie Bonaventuras: Die Lehren vom Lumen Mentis, von der Gradatio Entium an der Influentia Sensus et Motus. Leiden: Brill, 1964.Google Scholar

Guerard des Lauriers, M. L., ‘La théologie de S. Thomas et la grâce actuelle’, L’Annee Theologique 6 (1945), 276–332.Google Scholar

Guerard des Lauriers, M. L., ‘Saint Augustin et la question de la certitude de la grâce au Concile de Trente’, in Augustinus Magister. 3 vols. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes, 1954, 2.1057–69.Google Scholar

Gundry, R. H., ‘Grace, Works and Staying Saved in Paul’, Biblia 60 (1985), 1–38.Google Scholar

Gyllenkrok, A., Rechtfertigung und Heiligung in der frühen evangelischen Theologie Luthers. Uppsala: Lundequistska bokhandeln, 1952.Google Scholar

Hafemann, S. J., ‘Paul and His Interpreters since F. C. Baur’, in Paul’s Message and Ministry in Covenant Perspective: Selected Essays. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2015, 3‒28.Google Scholar

Hägglund, B., ‘Rechtfertigung – Wiedergeburt – Erneuerung in der nachreformatorischen Theologie’, KuD 5 (1959), 318–37.Google Scholar

Hägglund, B., ‘Luthers Anthropologie’, in Junghans, H., ed., Leben und Werk Martin Luthers von 1526 bis 1546: Festgabe zu seinem 500. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983, 63–76.Google Scholar

Hahn, F., ‘Gibt es eine Entwicklung in den Aussagen über die Rechtfertigung bei Paulus?’, EvTh 53 (1993), 342–66.Google Scholar

Haldane, J., ‘Voluntarism and Realism in Medieval Ethics’, Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1989), 39–44.Google Scholar

Hall, B., ‘The Early Rise and Gradual Decline of Lutheranism in England (1520–1600)’, in Baker, D., ed., Reform and Reformation: England and the Continent c. 1500–c. 1750. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979, 103–31.Google Scholar

Hall, H. A., Philip Melanchthon and the Cappadocians: A Reception of Greek Patristic Sources in the Sixteenth Century. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014.Google Scholar

Hallonsten, G., Satisfactio bei Tertullian: Überprüfung einer Forschungstradition. Malmö: CWK Gleerup, 1984.Google Scholar

Hallonsten, G., Merit bei Tertullian: Überprüfung einer Forschungstradition 2. Malmö: CWK Gleerup, 1985.Google Scholar

Hallonsten, G., ‘Theosis in Recent Research: A Renewal of Interest and a Need for Clarity’, in Christensen, M. and Wittung, J., eds, Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007, 281–93.Google Scholar

Hamilton, S., The Practice of Penance, 900–1050. London: Royal Historical Society, 2011.Google Scholar

Hamm, B., Promissio, pactum, ordinatio: Freiheit und Selbstbindung Gottes in der scholastischen Gnadenlehre. Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar

Hamm, B., ‘Was ist reformatorische Rechtfertigungslehre?’, ZThK 83 (1986), 1–38.Google Scholar

Hamm, B., ‘Wie innovativ war die Reformation?’, ZHF 27 (2000), 481–97.Google Scholar

Hamm, B., Der frühe Luther: Etappen reformatorischer Neuorientierung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar

Hammann, K., Rudolf Bultmann und seine Zeit: Biographische und Theologische Konstellationen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.Google Scholar

Hammer, F., Genugtuung und Heil: Absicht, Sinn und Grenzen der Erlösungslehre Anselms von Canterbury. Vienna: Herder, 1966.Google Scholar

Hardwick, C., A History of the Articles of Religion. 3rd edn. London: Bell, 1890.Google Scholar

Hare, J. C., Vindication of Luther against His Recent English Assailants. 2nd edn. Cambridge: MacMillan, 1855.Google Scholar

Häring, N., Die Theologie der Erfurter Augustiner-Eremiten Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen. Limburg: Pallottiner Verlag, 1939.Google Scholar

Harkins, F. T., ‘Filiae Magistri: Peter Lombard’s Sentences and Medieval Theological Education “On the Ground”’, in Rosemann, P. W., ed., Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001–15, vol. 3, 26–78.Google Scholar

Härle, W., ‘Analytische und synthetische Urteile in der Rechtfertigungslehre’, NZSTh 6 (1974), 17–34.Google Scholar

Härle, W., ‘Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der “Rechtfertigungs”-Lehre: Eine Problem-skizze’, ZThK 10 (1998), 101–39.Google Scholar

Härle, W., and Neuner, P., eds, Im Licht der Gnade Gottes: Zur Gegenwartsbedeutung der Rechtfertigungsbotschaft. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

Harris, H., The Tübingen School: A Historical and Theological Investigation of the School of F. C. Baur. 2nd edn. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1990.Google Scholar

Harrison, C., Rethinking Augustine’s Early Theology: An Argument for Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Harrison, P., ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hart, D. B., The Doors of the Sea: Where Was God in the Tsunami? Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Haubst, R., ‘Anselms Satisfaktionslehre einst und heute’, TThZ 80 (1971), 88‒109.Google Scholar

Hauke, R., Gott-Haben, um Gottes Willen: Andreas Osianders Theosisgedanke und die Diskussion um die Grundlagen der evangelisch verstandenen Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar

Hausamman, S., Römerbriefvorlesung zwischen Humanismus und Reformation: Eine Studie zu Heinrich Bullingers Römerbriefvorlesung von 1525. Zurich: Zwingli Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Hauschildt, E., ‘Rechtfertigung im Alltag’, in Rechtfertigung – folgenlos? Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt 2017, 173–85.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A., The Greek Concept of Justice: From Its Shadow in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Hayes, Z., The General Doctrine of Creation in the Thirteenth Century with Special Emphasis on Matthew of Aquasparta. Munich: Schoningh, 1964.Google Scholar

Headley, J. M., Hillerbrand, H. J. and Papalas, A. J., eds, Confessionalization in Europe, 1555–1700. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Healey, M., ‘Biblical Interpretation since Divino afflante Spiritu’, in Ayres, L. and Volpe, M. A., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 767–81.Google Scholar

Hefner, J., Die Entstehungsgeschichte des Trienter Rechtfertigungsdekretes: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Reformationszeitalters. Paderborn: Verlag Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1939.Google Scholar

Heil, J., ‘Haimo’s Commentary on Paul: Sources, Methods and Theology’, in Shimahara, S., ed., Études d’exégèse carolingienne: autour d’Haymon d’Auxerre. Turnhout: Brepols, 2007, 103–21.Google Scholar

Heil, J. P., ‘Christ, the Termination of the Law (Romans 9:30–10:8)’, CBQ 63 (2001), 484–98.Google Scholar

Heit, A., Versöhnte Vernunft: Eine Studie zur systematischen Bedeutung des Rechtfertigungsgedankens für Kants Religionsphilosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar

Heither, T., Translatio Religionis: Die Paulusdeutung des Origenes in seinem Kommentar zum Römerbrief. Cologne: Böhlau, 1990.Google Scholar

Hennings, R., Der Briefwechsel zwischen Augustinus und Hieronymus und ihr Streit um fen Kanon des Alten Testaments und die Auslegung von Gal. 2, 11–14. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar

Heppe, H., Geschichte des Pietismus und der Mystik in der reformirten Kirche, namentlich der Niederlande. Leiden: Brill, 1851.Google Scholar

Herdt, J. A., ‘Alasdair Macintyre’s “Rationality of Traditions” and Tradition-Transcendental Standards of Justification’, JR 78 (1998), 524–46.Google Scholar

Hermann, R., Luthers These ‘Gerecht und Sünder zugleich’: Eine systematische Untersuchung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1960.Google Scholar

Heron, A. I. C., ‘Wenn Luther uns mit unserem Bekenntnis annehmen will: Luther und die Abendmahlsfrage in den Briefen Calvins bis 1546’, in Litz, G., Munzert, H. and Liebenberg, R., eds, Frömmigkeit – Theologie – Frömmigkeitstheologie: Festschrift für Berndt Hamm zum 60. Geburtstag. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 395–409.Google Scholar

Hess, H., ‘The Place of Divinization in Athanasian Soteriology’, StPatr (1993), 369–74.Google Scholar

Hervé de l’Incarnation, ‘La grâce dans l’oeuvre de S. Leon le Grand’, RThAM 22 (1955), 193–212.Google Scholar

Heubach, J., Luther und Theosis. Erlangen: Martin-Luther-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Die aktuelle Gnade bei Richard von Mediavilla’, FS 22 (1935), 297–325.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Untersuchungen uber die Reuelehre der tridentinischen Zeit’, FS 29 (1942), 25–44, 120–50; 30 (1943), 53–73.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘A Controversy at the Council of Trent Concerning the Doctrine of Duns Scotus’, FrS 9 (1949), 181–258.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Der Anteil des Konzilstheologen Andreas de Vega O.F.M. an dem ersten amtlichen Entwurf des Trienter Rechtfertigungsdekretes’, FS 33 (1951), 49–81.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Zum Problem der unvollkommenen Reue auf dem Konzil von Trient’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Wirken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 231–80.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Zur Kontroverse uber die Gnadengewissheit auf dem Konzil von Trient’, FS 37 (1955), 1–17, 161–88.Google Scholar

Heynck, V., ‘Die Bedeutung von “mereri” und “promereri” bei dem Konzilstheologen Andreas de Vega O.F.M.’, FS 50 (1968), 224–38.Google Scholar

Hickling, C. J. A., ‘Centre and Periphery in the Thought of St Paul’, StB 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1978, 199–214.Google Scholar

Higman, F. M., ‘Theology for the Layman in the French Reformation, 1520–1550’, The Library 9 (1987), 105–27.Google Scholar

Higman, F. M., ‘Histoire du Livre et histoire de la Réforme’, BSHPF 148 (2002), 837–50.Google Scholar

Hildesheimer, F., Le Jansénisme: L’histoire et l’héritage. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1992.Google Scholar

Hill, D., Greek Words and Hebrew Meanings: Studies in the Semantics of Soteriological Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hillerbrand, H. J., ‘Was There a Reformation in the Sixteenth Century?’ ChH 72 (2003), 525–52.Google Scholar

Hillgarth, J. N., ‘Who Read Thomas Aquinas?’, in The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2008, 46–73.Google Scholar

Hinlicky, P. R., ‘Theological Anthropology: Toward Integrating Theosis and Justification by Faith’, JES 34 (1997), 38–73.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E., Die Theologie des Andreas Osiander und ihre geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen. Göttingen: Mohn, 1919.Google Scholar

Ho, A., Ṣedeq and Ṣedaqah in the Hebrew Bible. New York: Peter Lang, 1991.Google Scholar

Hoburg, R., Seligkeit und Heilsgewissheit: Hermeneutik und Schriftauslegung bei Huldrych Zwingli bis 1522. Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Hocedez, E., Richard de Middleton: sa vie, ses oeuvres, sa doctrine. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1925.Google Scholar

Hochstetter, E., ‘Nominalismus?’ FrS 9 (1949), 370–403.Google Scholar

Hodgson, L., For Faith and Freedom. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F., Die Schriften des Oxforder Kanzlers Johannes Lutterell: Texte zur Theologie des 14. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M., ‘Faith and Piety in Erasmus’s Thought’, SCJ 20 (1989), 241–58.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M., ‘Language and Reconciliation: Erasmus’s Ecumenical Method’, ERSY 15 (1995), 71–95.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, V., ‘Rechtfertigung als Gabe der Anerkennung’, ÖR 60 (2011), 160–77.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, V., Skizzen zu einer Theologie der Gabe: Rechtfertigung – Opfer – Eucharistie – Gottes – und Nächstenliebe. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2013.Google Scholar

Hofmann, F., Albrecht Ritschls Lutherrezeption. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1998.Google Scholar

Hohenberger, T., Lutherische Rechtfertigungslehre in den reformatorischen Flugschriften der Jahre 1521–2. Tübingen: Mohr, 1996.Google Scholar

Holc, P., Un ampio consenso sulla dottrina della giustificazione: studio sul dialogo teologico cattolico-luterano. Rome: Libreria editrice dell’Università Gregoriana, 1999.Google Scholar

Holder, R. W., ‘Erasmus and the Novum Instrumentum’, CHRC 96 (2016), 491–7.Google Scholar

Holfelder, H. H., Tentatio et consolatio: Studien zu Bugenhagens Interpretatio in Librum Psalmorum. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1974.Google Scholar

Holfelder, H. H., Solus Christus: Die Ausbildung von Bugenhagens Rechtfertigungslehre in der Paulusauslegung (1524/25) und ihre Bedeutung für die theologische Argumentation im Sendbrief ‘Von dem christlichen Glauben’. Tübingen: Mohr, 1981.Google Scholar

Holl, K., ‘Die justitia Dei in der vorlutherischen Bibelauslegung des Abendlandes’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, vol. 3, 171–88.Google Scholar

Holl, K., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre in Luthers Vorlesung über den Römerbrief mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Frage der Heilsgewißheit’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, vol. 1, 111–54.Google Scholar

Holl, K., ‘Was verstand Luther unter Religion?’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte. 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr, 1928, 1–110.Google Scholar

Hollingworth, M., Saint Augustine of Hippo: An Intellectual Biography. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Holm, B. K., Gabe und Geben bei Luther: Das Verhältnis zwischen Reziprozität und reformatorischer Rechtfertigungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006.Google Scholar

Holman, S. R., ‘Healing the Social Leper in Gregory of Nyssa’s and Gregory of Nazianzus’s Peri Philoptochia’, HThR 92 (1999), 283–309.Google Scholar

Holmes, R., The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. New York: Vintage Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Holmes, S. R., ‘Reformed Varieties of the Communicatio Idiomatum’, in Rae, M. A., ed., The Person of Christ. London: T&T Clark, 2005, 70–86.Google Scholar

Holsinger-Friesen, T., Irenaeus and Genesis: A Study of Competition in Early Christian Hermeneutics. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009.Google Scholar

Holtzen, T. L., ‘Newman’s “Via Media” Theology of Justification’, Newman Studies Journal 4 (2007), 64–74.Google Scholar

Hommel, H., ‘Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit: Zur Geschichte und Deutung eines Begriffspaars’, AuA 15 (1969), 159–86.Google Scholar

Hooker, M. D., ‘On Becoming the Righteousness of God: Another Look at 2 Cor 5:21’, NT 50 (2008), 358–75.Google Scholar

Horan, D. P., ‘How Original Was Scotus on the Incarnation? Reconsidering the History of the Absolute Primacy of Christ in Light of Robert Grosseteste’, HeyJ 52 (2011), 374–91.Google Scholar

Horgan, A. D., ‘Justice in The Pearl’, Review of English Studies 32 (1981), 173–80.Google Scholar

Horn, C., ‘Politische Gerechtigkeit bei Cicero und Augustinus’, Etica & Politica 9 (2007), 46–70.Google Scholar

Horn, S., Glaube und Rechtfertigung nach dem Konzilstheologer Andres de Vega. Paderborn: Verlag Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1972.Google Scholar

Hornig, G., ‘Lehre und Bekenntnis im Kulturprotestantismus’, StTh 29 (1975), 157–80.Google Scholar

Hornig, G., ‘Die Freiheit der christlichen Privatreligion: Semlers Begründung des religiösen Individualismus in den protestantischen Aufklärungstheologie’, NZSTh 21 (1979), 198–211.Google Scholar

Horst, U., Die Gaben des Heiligen Geistes nach Thomas von Aquin. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Horton, M. S., ‘Engaging N. T. Wright and John Piper’, in Glomsrud, R. and Horton, M. S., eds, Justified: Modern Reformation Essays on the Doctrine of Justification. Scotts Valley, CA: Createspace, 2010, 11–30.Google Scholar

Horton, M. S., Justification. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2018.Google Scholar

Hossfeld, F.-L., and Söding, T., Worum geht es in der Rechtfertigungslehre? Das biblische Fundament der ‘Gemeinsamen Erklärung’ von Katholischer Kirche und Lutherischem Weltbund. Freiburg: Herder, 1999.Google Scholar

Houghton, H. A. G., The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hours, H., ‘Procès d’hérésie contre Aimé Maigret (Lyon-Grenoble, 1524)’, BHR 19 (1957), 14–43.Google Scholar

Hövelmann, H., ‘Die ökumenische Vereinbarung zur Rechtfertigungslehre im Diskurs der Lutherforscher’, Luther 71 (2000), 143–50.Google Scholar

Hovorun, C., ‘Two Meanings of Freedom in the Eastern Patristic Tradition’, in Welker, W., ed., Questions for Freedom. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 2015, 133–44.Google Scholar

Howard, J. A., ‘Social Psychology of Identities’, ARS 26 (2000), 367–93.Google Scholar

Hübinger, G., Kulturprotestantismus und Politik: Zum Verhältnis vom Liberalismus und Protestantismus im wilhelminischen Deutschland. Tübingen: Mohr, 1994.Google Scholar

Hübner, H., ‘Rechtfertigung und Sühne bei Paulus: Eine hermeneutische und Theologische Besinnung’, NTS 39 (1993), 80–93.Google Scholar

Hudson, W., Enlightenment and Modernity: The English Deists and Reform. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2009.Google Scholar

Hultgren, A. J., Paul’s Gospel and Mission. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Humfress, C., ‘Citizens and Heretics: Late Roman Lawyers on Christian Heresy’, in Iricinschi, E. and Zellentin, H. M., eds, Heresy and Identity in Late Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008, 128–42.Google Scholar

Humphries, T. L., Ascetic Pneumatology from John Cassian to Gregory the Great. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hünermann, F., Wesen und Notwendigkeit der aktuellen Gnade nach dem Konzil von Trient. Paderborn: Verlag Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1926.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, G., ‘What Karl Barth Learned From Martin Luther’, LuQ 13 (1999), 125–55.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, G. ‘What’s at Stake in Current Debates over Justification? The Crisis of Protestantism in the West’, in Husbands, M. A. and Trier, D. J., eds, Justification: What’s at Stake in the Current Debates. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004, 81–117.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, G. ‘Justitia aliena: Karl Barth in Conversation with the Evangelical Doctrine of Imputed Righteousness’, in McCormack, B., Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006, 167–96.Google Scholar

Hurtado, L., ‘New Testament Studies in the 20th Century’, Religion 39 (2009), 43–57.Google Scholar

Hurtado, L., Destroyer of the Gods: Early Christian Distinctiveness in the Roman World. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hušek, V., ‘Human Freedom according to the Earliest Latin Commentaries on Paul’s Letters’, StPatr 44 (2010), 385–90.Google Scholar

Huthmacher, H., ‘La Certitude de la grâce au Concile de Trente’, NRTh 60 (1933), 213–26.Google Scholar

Hwang, A. Y., Intrepid Lover of Perfect Grace: The Life and Thought of Prosper of Aquitaine. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hwang, A. Y., ‘Manifold Grace in John Cassian and Prosper of Aquitaine’, SJTh 63 (2010), 93–108.Google Scholar

Irmscher, H.-D., ‘Aspekte der Geschichtsphilosophie Johann Gottfried Herders, in Heinz, M., ed., Herder und die Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997, 5–47.Google Scholar

Irons, C. L., The Righteousness of God: A Lexical Examination of the Covenant–Faithfulness Interpretation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar

Iserloh, E., Gnade und Eucharistie in der philosophischen Theologie des Wilhelm von Ockham: Ihre Bedeutung für die Ursachen der Reformation. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1956.Google Scholar

Isolde, K., ‘Seelsorge im Horizont der Hoffnung: Eduard Thurneysens Seelsorgelehre in systemtheoretischer Perspektive’, EvTh 63 (2003), 165–81.Google Scholar

Israel, J. I., Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

James, F. A., ‘Romans Commentary: Justification and Sanctification’, in James, F. A., Campi, E. and Kirby, T., eds, Companion to Peter Martyr Vermigli. Leiden: Brill, 2009, 305–18.Google Scholar

Jansen, F.-X., Baius et la Baianisme. Louvain: Éditions du Muséum Lessianum, 1927.Google Scholar

Janz, D., ‘A Reinterpretation of Gabriel Biel on Nature and Grace’, SCJ 8 (1977), 104–8.Google Scholar

Javelet, R., Image et ressemblance au XII^e siècle de S. Anselme á Alain de Lille. 2 vols. Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1967.Google Scholar

Jedin, H., Papal Legate at the Council of Trent: Cardinal Seripando. London: Herder, 1947.Google Scholar

Jedin, H., Kardinal Contarini als Kontroverstheologe. Münster: Aschendorff, 1949.Google Scholar

Jedin, H., Geschichte des Konzils von Trient. 4 vols: Freiburg: Herder, 1951–75.Google Scholar

Jedin, H., ‘An welchen Gegensätzen sind die vortridentinischen Religionsgespräche zwischen Katholiken und Protestanten gescheitert?’, ThGl 48 (1958), 50–5.Google Scholar

Jedin, H., ‘Wo sah die vortridentinische Kirche die Lehrdifferenzen mit Luther?’ Catholica 21 (1967), 85–100.Google Scholar

Jenson, R. W., ‘Justification as a Triune Event’, MoTh 11 (1995), 421–7.Google Scholar

Jenson, R. W, ‘Rechtfertigung und Ekklesiologie’, KuD 42 (1996), 202–17.Google Scholar

Jenson, R. W, Systematic Theology. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997–9.Google Scholar

Jepsen, A., ‘sdq und sdqh im Alten Testament’, in Reventloh, H. G., ed., Gottes Wort und Gottes Land. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1965, 78–89.Google Scholar

Joest, W., Gesetz und Freiheit: Das Problem des tertius usus legis bei Luther und die neutestamentliche Parainese. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956.Google Scholar

Joest, W., ‘Die tridentinische Rechtfertigungslehre’, KuD 9 (1963), 41–59.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. J., ‘The Servant Lord: A Word of Caution Regarding the munus triplex in Karl Barth’s Theology and the Church Today’, SJTh 65 (2012), 159–73.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. S., ‘Justification and Sanctification in Calvin’s Theology’, ThZ 65 (2009), 90–104.Google Scholar

Joosten, J., ‘Une théologie de la Septante? Réflexions méthodologiques sur l’interprétation de la version grecque’, RTP 132 (2000), 31–46.Google Scholar

Jorissen, H., ‘Einig in der Rechtfertigungslehre: Das Verständnis der Rechtfertigung im Konzil von Trient und bei Martin Luther’, in Beintker, M., ed., Rechtfertigung und Erfahrung. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 1995, 81–103.Google Scholar

Jue, J. K., ‘The Active Obedience of Christ and the Theology of the Westminster Standards: A Historical Investigation’, in Oliphint, K. S., ed., Justified in Christ. Fearn: Mentor, 2007, 99–130.Google Scholar

Jung, M. H., ‘The Impact of Pietism on Culture and Society in Germany’, in Ingesman, P., ed., Religion as an Agent of Change. Leiden: Brill, 2016, 211–30.Google Scholar

Jüngel, E., ‘Glauben und Verstehen: Zum Theologiebegriff Rudolf Bultmanns’, in Wertlose Wahrheit: Zur Identität und Relevanz des christlichen Glaubens – Theologische Erörterungen III. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1990, 16–77.Google Scholar

Jüngel, E., Das Evangelium von der Rechtfertigung des Gottlosen als Zentrum des christlichen Glaubens: Eine theologische Studie in ökumenischer Absicht. 6th edn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar

Kadane, M., ‘Original Sin and the Path to the Enlightenment’, PP 235 (2017), 105–40.Google Scholar

Kähler, E., Karlstadt und Augustin: Der Kommentar des Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt zu Augustins Schrift De spiritu et litera. Halle: Niemeyer, 1952.Google Scholar

Kähler, M., Zur Lehre von der Versöhnung. Leipzig: Deichert, 1898.Google Scholar

Kähler, M., Die Wissenschaft der christlichen Lehre von dem evangelischen Grundartikel aus, im Abrisse dargestellt. 3rd edn. Leipzig: Deichert, 1905.Google Scholar

Kaiser, A., Natur und Gnade im Urstand: Eine Untersuchung der Kontroverse zwischen Michael Baius und Johannes Martinez de Ripaldi. Munich: Hueber, 1965.Google Scholar

Kaiser, O., ‘Dike und Sedaqa. Zur Frage nach der sittlichen Weltordnung: Ein theologische Präludium’, NZSThR 7 (1965), 251–75.Google Scholar

Kaiser, U. U., Die Rede von ‘Wiedergeburt’ im Neuen Testament: Ein metapherntheoretisch orientierter Neuansatz nach 100 Jahren Forschungsgeschichte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar

Käsemann, E., ed., Das Neue Testament als Kanon: Dokumentation und kritische Analyse zur gegenwärtigen Diskussion. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970.Google Scholar

Käsemann, E., Exegetische Versuche und Besinnungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar

Kasper, W., That They May All Be One: The Call to Unity. London: Burns & Oates, 2004.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T., ‘Bucers Bericht von der Heidelberger Disputation’, ARG 82 (1991), 147–70.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T. ‘Streittheologie und Friedensdiplomatie: Die Rolle Martin Bucers im frühen Abendmahlsstreit’, in Krieger, C. and Lienhard, M., eds, Martin Bucer and Sixteenth Century Europe. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1993, vol. 1, 239–56.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T. ‘Die Konfessionalisierung von Kirche und Gesellschaft. Sammelbericht über eine Forschungsdebatte’, ThLZ 121 (1996), 1008–25, 1112–21.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, T. ‘Die “kriteriologische Funktion” der Rechtfertigungslehre in den lutherischen Bekenntnisschriften’, ZThK 10 (1998), 47‒64.Google Scholar

Kaup, J., ‘Zum Begriff der iustitia originalis in der älteren Franziskanerschule’, FS 29 (1942), 44–55.Google Scholar

Keating, D. A., The Appropriation of Divine Life in Cyril of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Keating, D. A., ‘Justification, Sanctification and Divinization in Thomas Aquinas’, in Weinandy, T. G., Keating, D. A. and Yocum, J. P., eds, Aquinas on Doctrine: A Critical Introduction. London: T&T Clark, 2004, 139–58.Google Scholar

Kedar, B., ‘The Latin Translations’, in Mulder, M. J., ed., Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004, 299–338.Google Scholar

Keech, D., The Anti-Pelagian Christology of Augustine of Hippo, 396–430. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Keen, R., ‘The Fathers in Counter-Reformation Theology in the Pre-Tridentine Period’, in Backus, I., ed., The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists. Leiden: Brill, 1997, 701–43.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. F., ‘Pelagius, Pelagianism and the Early Christian Irish’, Mediaevalia 4 (1978), 99–124.Google Scholar

Kendall, R. T., Calvin and English Calvinism to 1649. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Kereszty, R., ‘The Jewish‒Christian Dialogue and the Pontifical Biblical Commission’s Document on “The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible”’, Communio 29 (2002), 738–45.Google Scholar

Kertelge, K., ‘Rechtfertigung’ bei Paulus: Studien zur Struktur und zum Bedeutungsgehalt des paulinischen Rechtfertigungsbegriffs. Münster Aschendorff, 1971.Google Scholar

Kickel, W., Vernunft und Offenbarung bei Theodor Beza: Zum Problem der Verhältnisses von Theologie, Philosophie und Staat. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Kieckhefer, R., ‘The Office of Inquisition and Medieval Heresy: The Transition from Personal to Institutional Jurisdiction’, JEH 46 (1995), 36–61.Google Scholar

King, B. J., Newman and the Alexandrian Fathers: Shaping Doctrine in Nineteenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kirby, W. J. T., Richard Hooker’s Doctrine of the Royal Supremacy. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar

Klaan, R., ‘Contemporary Lutheran Views of Justification’, CTQ 45 (1981), 281–96.Google Scholar

Kleinschwärzer-Meister, B., In Allem auf Christus hin: Zur theologischen Funktion der Rechtfertigungslehre. Freiburg: Herder, 2007.Google Scholar

Kloppenborg, J. S., ‘Egalitarianism in the Myth and Rhetoric of Pauline Churches’, in Castelli, E. A. and Taussig, H., eds, Reimagining Christian Origins. Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996, 247–63.Google Scholar

Knight, J., Orthodoxies in Massachusetts: Rereading American Puritanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Knoll, M., ‘Die distributive Gerechtigkeit bei Platon und Aristoteles’, ZfP 1 (2010), 3–30.Google Scholar

Knox, D. B., The Doctrine of Faith in the Reign of Henry VIII. London: James Clarke, 1961.Google Scholar

Köberle, A., Rechtfertigung und Heiligung: Eine biblische, theologiegeschichtliche und systematische Untersuchung. Leipzig: Dörffling & Franke, 1929.Google Scholar

Koch, J., ‘Neue Aktenstücke zu dem gegen Wilhelm von Ockham in Avignon geführten Prozess’, RThAM 8 (1936), 168–97.Google Scholar

Koch, K., Studium Pietatis: Martin Bucer als Ethiker. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar

Kohls, E.-W., Die Theologie des Erasmus, 2 vols. Basel: Reinhard, 1966.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘Martin Bucer: Erasmien et Martinien tel que la montre sa conception du baptême’, in Livet, G. and Rapp, F., eds, Strasbourg au cœur religieux de XVIe siècle. Strasbourg: Librairie Istra, 1977, 167–83.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., Nikolaus von Amsdorf: Popular Polemics in the Preservation of Luther’s Legacy. Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1978.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘The Ordering of the Loci Communes Theologici: The Structuring of the Melanchthonian Dogmatic Tradition’, ConJ 23 (1997), 317–37.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., Bound Choice, Election, and Wittenberg Theological Method: From Martin Luther to the Formula of Concord. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘Rechtfertigungslehre’, in Frank, G. and Lange, A., eds, Philipp Melanchthon: Der Reformator zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017, 347–62.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., and Arand, C. P., The Genius of Luther’s Theology: A Wittenberg Way of Thinking for the Contemporary Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.Google Scholar

Kölmel, W., ‘Das Naturrecht bei Wilhelm Ockham’, FS 35 (1953), 39–85.Google Scholar

Kölmel, W., ‘Von Ockham zu Gabriel Biel: Zur Naturrechtslehre des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts’, FS 37 (1955), 218–59.Google Scholar

Köpf, U., ‘Melanchthon als systematischer Theologe neben Luther’, in Frank, G. and Loehr, J., Der Theologe Melanchthon. Stuttgart: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 2000, 103–228.Google Scholar

Koslofsky, C., The Reformation of the Dead. Death and Ritual in Early Modern Germany, 1450–1700. New York: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

Koslowski, J., ‘“Versöhnte Verschiedenheit von Schwesterkirchen?” Über die Begriffs- und Bedeutungsvielfalt in der Diskussion über die Einheit der Kirche’, MThZ 60 (2009), 3141–26.Google Scholar

Kötter, R., Johannes Bugenhagens Rechtfertigungslehre und der römische Katholizismus: Studien zum Sendbrief an die Hamburger, 1525. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994.Google Scholar

Kötter, R., ‘Zur Entwicklung der Rechtfertigungslehre Johannes Bugenhagens 1521–1525’, ZKG 105 (1994), 18–34.Google Scholar

Kötz, S., ‘The Last Scholastic on Money: Gabriel Biel’s Monetary Theory’, in Fox, D. and Ernst, W., Money in the Western Legal Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 71–90.Google Scholar

Kraus, H. J., Theology of the Psalms. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 1986.Google Scholar

Krawczack, P., ‘Es gibt einen Gott, der Richter ist auf Erden!’ (Ps 58, 12b): Ein exegetischer Beitrag zum Verständnis von Psalm 58. Berlin: Philo, 2001.Google Scholar

Krichbaum, A., Kierkegaard und Schleiermacher: Eine historisch-systematische Studie zum Religionsbegriff. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Kriechbaum, F., Grundzüge der Theologie Karlstadts: Eine systematische Studie zur Erhellung der Theologie Andreas von Karlstadts. Hamburg: Reich, 1967.Google Scholar

Kroeger, M., Rechtfertigung und Gesetz: Studien zur Entwicklung der Rechtfertigungslehre beim jungen Luther. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1968.Google Scholar

Kruger, F., Bucer und Erasmus: Eine Untersuchung zum Einfluss des Erasmus auf die Theologie Martin Bucers. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1970.Google Scholar

Kühn, U., and Pesch, O. H.. Rechtfertigung im Disput: Eine freundliche Antwort an Jörg Baur. Tübingen: Mohr, 1991.Google Scholar

Küng, H., ‘Ist in der Rechtfertigungslehre eine Einigung möglich?’, Una Sancta 12 (1957), 116–21.Google Scholar

Küng, H., Rechtfertigung: Die Lehre Karl Barths und eine katholische Besinnung. Einsiedeln: Johannes Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar

Kuula, K., The Law, the Covenant, and God’s Plan: Paul’s Polemical Treatment of the Law in Galatians. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999.Google Scholar

Kwŏn, Y.-G., Eschatology in Galatians: Rethinking Paul’s Response to the Crisis in Galatia. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar

Lafferty, M. K., ‘Translating Faith from Greek to Latin: Romanitas and Christianitas in Late Fourth-Century Rome and Milan’, JECS 11 (2003), 21–62.Google Scholar

Lahey, S. E., John Wyclif. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Laird, M. S., ‘“By Faith Alone”: A Technical Term in Gregory of Nyssa’, VigChr 54 (2000), 61–79.Google Scholar

Laird, M. S., Gregory of Nyssa and the Grasp of Faith: Union, Knowledge, and Divine Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lake, P., ‘The Laudian Style: Order, Uniformity and the Pursuit of the Beauty of Holiness in the 1630s’, in Fincham, K., ed., The Early Stuart Church, 1603–1642. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993, 161–85.Google Scholar

Lake, P., ‘The Historiography of Puritanism’, in Coffey, J. and Lim, P. C. H., eds, The Cambridge Companion to Puritanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 346–71.Google Scholar

Lamberigts, M., ‘Julian of Aeclanum on Grace: Some Considerations’, StPatr 27 (1991), 342–9.Google Scholar

Lamberigts, M., ‘Recent Research into Pelagianism with Particular Emphasis on the Role of Julian of Aeclanum’, Augustiniana 52 (2002), 175–98.Google Scholar

Lambert, F., ‘Pietas Hallensis and the American Great Awakening’, in Wellenreuther, H., Müller-Bahlke, T. and Roeber, A. G., eds, The Transatlantic World of Heinrich Melchior Mühlenberg in the Eighteenth Century. Halle: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen, 2013, 199–212.Google Scholar

Lamm, J. A., ‘The Early Philosophical Roots of Schleiermacher’s Notion of Gefühl, 1788–1794’, HThR 87 (1994), 67‒105.Google Scholar

Lamm, J. A., The Living God: Schleiermacher’s Theological Appropriation of Spinoza. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., ‘Untersuchungen zu den Eigenlehren Gilberts de la Porrée’, ZKTh 54 (1930), 180–213.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., ‘Mitteilungen zur Schule Gilberts de la Porrée’, CFr 3 (1933), 185–208.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., ‘Neue Funde zur Porretanerschule’, CFr 6 (1936), 354–63.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., ‘Der Porretanismus der Homilien des Radulphus Ardens’, ZKTh 64 (1940), 132–48.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., Einführung in die Geschichte der theologischen Literatur der Frühscholastik. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1948.Google Scholar

Landgraf, A. M., Dogmengeschichte der Frühscholastik. 8 vols. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1952–6.Google Scholar

Landmesser, C., ‘Ferdinand Christian Baur as Interpreter of Paul’, in Bauspiess, M., Landmesser, C. and Lincicum, D., eds, Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 147–76.Google Scholar

Lane, A. N. S., Justification by Faith in Catholic–Protestant Dialogue: An Evangelical Assessment. London: T&T Clark, 2002.Google Scholar

Lane, A. N. S., ‘Calvin and Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy’, in Selderhuis, H. J., ed., Calvinus Praeceptor Ecclesiae. Geneva: Droz, 2004, 233–63.Google Scholar

Lane, A. N. S., ‘Cardinal Contarini and Article 5 of the Regensburg Colloquy (1541)’, in Meuffels, O. and Bründl, J., eds, Grenzgänge der Theologie: Alexandre Ganoczy zum 75. Geburtstag. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2004, 163–90.Google Scholar

Lane, A. N. S., Regensburg Article 5 on Justification: Inconsistent Patchwork or Substance of True Doctrine? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Lang, T. J., and Crawford, M. R., ‘The Origins of Pauline Theology: Paratexts and Priscillian of Avila’s Canons on the Letters of the Apostle Paul’, NTS 63 (2017), 125–45.Google Scholar

Lange, P., Konkrete Theologie? Karl Barth und Friedrich Gogarten ʻZwischen den Zeiten’ (1922–1933). Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Langston, D. A., ‘Scotus and Possible Worlds’, in Knuuttila, S., Ebbesen, S. and Työrinoja, R., eds, Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy. Helsinki: Luther-Agricola Society, 1990, vol. 2, 240–7.Google Scholar

Langton, D. R., ‘Modern Jewish Identity and the Apostle Paul: Pauline Studies as an Intra-Jewish Ideological Battleground’, JSNT 28 (2005), 217–58.Google Scholar

Laplanche, F., Orthodoxie et prédication: l’œuvre d’Amyraut et la querelle de la grâce universelle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1965.Google Scholar

Larchet, J. C., La divinisation de l’homme selon Saint Maxime le Confesseur. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar

Laube, A., and Weiss, U., eds, Flugschriften gegen die Reformation (1518–1524). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar

Laun, J. F., ‘Die Prädestination bei Wiclif und Bradwardin’, in Bornkamm, H., ed., Imago Dei: Festschrift für G. Kruger. Giessen: Topelmann, 1932, 63–84.Google Scholar

Laursen, J. C., ed., Histories of Heresy in Early Modern Europe. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar

Law, T. M., When God Spoke Greek: The Septuagint and the Making of the Christian Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Lee, B. J., Johannes Cocceius and the Exegetical Roots of Federal Theology: Reformation Developments in the Interpretation of Hebrews 7–10. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009.Google Scholar

Lee, H. J., The Biblical Accommodation Debate in Germany: Interpretation and the Enlightenment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Lees, C. A., Tradition and Belief: Religious Writing in Late Anglo-Saxon England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Leff, G., Bradwardine and the Pelagians: A Study of ‘De Causa Dei’ and Its Opponents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Leff, G., William of Ockham: The Metamorphosis of Scholastic Discourse. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Legge, D., The Trinitarian Christology of St Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Lehner, U. L., ‘Catholic Theology and the Enlightenment (1670–1815), in Ayres, L. and Volpe, M. A., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 595–611.Google Scholar

Lehner, U. L., and Burson, J., eds, Catholicism and Enlightenment in Europe: A Transnational History. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lehner, U. L., and Printy, M., eds, A Companion to the Catholic Enlightenment in Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Lennerz, H., ‘De historia applicationis principii “omnis ordinate volens prius vult finem quam ea quae sunt ad finem” ad probandam gratuitatem praedestinationis ad gloriam’, Gregorianum 10 (1929), 238–66.Google Scholar

Lennerz, J., ‘Voten auf dem Trienter Konzil über die Rechtfertigung’, Gregorianum 15 (1934), 577–88.Google Scholar

Lettieri, G., L’altro Agostino: Ermeneutica e retorica della grazia dalla crisi alla metamorfosi del de Doctrina Christiana. Brescia: Morcelliana, 2002.Google Scholar

Levering, M., Christ’s Fulfillment of Torah and Temple: Salvation according to Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Levering, M., Paul in the Summa Theologiae. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Levy, I. C., ‘Grace and Freedom in the Soteriology of John Wyclif’, Traditio 60 (2005), 279–337.Google Scholar

Levy, I. C. ‘Fides quae per caritatem operatur: Love as the Hermeneutical Key in Medieval Galatians Commentaries’, Cistercian Studies Quarterly 43 (2008), 41–62.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S., An Experiment in Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Lexutt, A., Rechtfertigung im Gespräch: Das Rechtfertigungsverständnis in den Religionsprächen von Hagenau, Worms und Regensburg, 1540/41. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar

Liebe, R., ‘Der kritische Personalismus und seine Bedeutung für die Theologie’, ZThK 7 (1926), 108–29.Google Scholar

Lieu, J. M., Neither Jew nor Greek? Constructing Early Christianity. London: T&T Clark, 2002.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. B., Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians. London: Macmillan, 1865.Google Scholar

Lim, P. C. H., In Pursuit of Purity, Unity, and Liberty: Richard Baxter’s Puritan Ecclesiology in Its Seventeenth-Century Context. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Lim, P. C. H., Mystery Unveiled: The Crisis of the Trinity in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lincoln, A., ‘From Wrath to Justification: Tradition, Gospel, and Audience in the Theology of Romans 1:18–4:25’, in Hay, D. M. and Johnson, E. E., eds, Pauline Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1995, vol. 3, 130–59.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, G., ‘Nominalism and the Problem of Meaning as Illustrated by Pierre d’Ailly on Predestination and Justification’, HThR 52 (1959), 43–60.Google Scholar

Linde, C., How to Correct the Sacra Scriptura? Textual Criticism of the Latin Bible between the Twelfth and Fifteenth Century. Oxford: Society for the Study of Medieval Languages and Literature, 2012.Google Scholar

Lindemann, A., Paulus im ältesten Christentum: Das Bild des Apostels und die Rezeption der paulinischen Theologie in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Marcion. Tübingen: Mohr, 1979.Google Scholar

Link-Wieczorek, U., ‘Wiedergutmachung statt Strafe: Zur versöhnungsethischen Aktualität der Satisfaktionstheorie’, KZG 26 (2013), 139–55.Google Scholar

Lio, H., Estne obligatio iustitiae subvenire miseris? Quaestionis positio et evolutio a Petro Lombardo ad S. Thomam tribus S. Augustine textibus. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1957.Google Scholar

Lipgens, W., Kardinal Johannes Gropper 1503–1559 und die Anfänge der katholischen Reform in Deutschland. Münster: Aschendorff, 1951.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. D., We Are Being Transformed: Deification in Paul’s Soteriology. Boston: de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar

Locher, G. W., Die Zwinglische Reformation im Rahmen der europäischen Kirchengeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979.Google Scholar

Loetz, F., Mit Gott handeln: von den Zürcher Götteslästeren der frühen Neuzeit zu einer Kulturgeschichte des Religiösen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.Google Scholar

Logan, E. M. T., ‘Grace and Justification: Some Italian Views on the 16th and Early 17th Centuries’, JEH 20 (1969), 67–78.Google Scholar

Löhr, W. A., Pélage et le Pélagianisme. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2015.Google Scholar

Lohse, B., ‘Beobachtungen zum Paulus-Kommentar des Marius Victorinus und zur Wiederentdeckung des Paulus in der lateinischen Theologie des vierten Jahrhunderts’, in Ritter, A. M., ed., Kerygma und Logos: Beiträge zu den geistesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen Antike und Christentum. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979, 351–66.Google Scholar

Lohse, B., ‘Zum Wittenberger Augustinismus: Augustins Schrift De spiritu et littera in der Auslegung bei Staupitz, Luther und Karlstadt’, in Hagen, K., ed., Augustine, the Harvest, and Theology (1300–1650). Leiden: Brill, 1990, 89–109.Google Scholar

Lohse, E., ‘Theologie der Rechtfertigung in kritischen Disput: Zu einigen neueren Perspektiven in der Interpretation der Theologie des Apostels Paulus’, GGA 249 (1997), 66–81.Google Scholar

Loi, V., ‘La funzione sociale della iustitia nella polemica anti-pagana di Lattanzio’, in Letterature comparate: problemi e metodo. Studi in onore di Ettore Paratore. 4 vols. Bologna, Pàtron, 1981, vol. 2, 843–52.Google Scholar

Lonergan, B. J. F., Grace and Reason: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1971.Google Scholar

Loofs, F., Leitfaden zum Studien der Dogmengeschichte. 4th edn. Halle: Niemeyer, 1906.Google Scholar

Loofs, F., ‘Der articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesiae’, ThStKr 90 (1917), 323–400.Google Scholar

Lopes Pereira, J., Augustine of Hippo and Martin Luther on Original Sin and Justification of the Sinner. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.Google Scholar

López, P. U., Theosis: La doctrina de la divinización en las tradiciones cristianas: Fundamentos para una teología ecumenica de la gracia. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, 2001.Google Scholar

Lorenz, R. ‘Der Augustinismus Prospers von Aquitanien’, ZKG 73 (1962), 217–52.Google Scholar

Lössl, J., Julian von Aeclanum: Studien zu seinem Leben, seinem Werk, seiner Lehre und ihrer Überlieferung. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Lössl, J., ‘Augustine, “Pelagianism”, Julian of Aeclanum and Modern Scholarship’, JAC 11 (2007), 129–50.Google Scholar

Lössl, J., ‘Pauline Exegesis in Patristic Commentaries of Old Testament Prophets: The Example of Julian of Aeclanum’s Tractatus in Amos’, JLARC 4 (2010), 1–27.Google Scholar

Lössl, J., ‘Augustine, “Pelagianism”, Julian of Aeclanum and Modern Scholarship’, ZAC, 11 (2017), 129–50.Google Scholar

Lottin, O., ‘L’Intellectualisme de la morale Thomiste’, Xenia Thomistica 1 (1925), 411–27.Google Scholar

Lottin, O., ‘Le concept de justice chez les théologiens du moyen âge avant l’introduction d’Aristôte’, RThom 44 (1938), 511–21.Google Scholar

Lottin, O., Psychologie et morale aux XII^e et XIII^e siècles. 8 vols. Gembloux: Duculot, 1942–60.Google Scholar

Lüders, H., Varuna I: Varuna und die Wasser. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.Google Scholar

Lüders, H., Varuna II: Varuna und das Rta. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.Google Scholar

Lugioyo, B., Martin Bucer’s Doctrine of Justification: Reformation Theology and Early Modern Irenicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lunn-Rockliffe, S., Ambrosiaster’s Political Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lütgert, W., Freiheitspredigt und Schwarmgeister in Korinth: Ein Beitrag zur Charakteristik der Christuspartei. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1908.Google Scholar

Macchia, F. D., Justified in the Spirit: Creation, Redemption, and the Triune God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, D., ‘The Myth of the English Reformation’, JBS 30 (1991), 1–19.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, D., Thomas Cranmer: A Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, D., The Reformation: A History. New York: Viking, 2003.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, D., ‘Changing Historical Perspectives on the English Reformation: The Last Fifty Years’, StChHist 49 (2013), 282–302.Google Scholar

Macken, J., The Autonomy Theme in the Church Dogmatics of Karl Barth and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Mackensen, H., ‘Debate between Eck and Melanchthon on Original Sin at the Colloquy of Worms’, LuQ 11 (1959), 42–56.Google Scholar

Macquarrie, J., Principles of Christian Theology. London: SCM Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Macquarrie, J. A., An Existentialist Theology: A Comparison of Heidegger and Bultmann. London: SCM Press, 2012.Google Scholar

MacQueen, D. J., ‘John Cassian on Grace and Free Will, with Particular Reference to Maxcey, C. E., “Double Justice, Diego Laynez, and the Council of Trent”, ChH 48 (1979), 269–78.Google Scholar

Maddox, R. L., ‘Opinion, Religion, and “Catholic Spirit”: John Wesley on Theological Integrity’, Asbury Theological Journal 47 (1992), 63–87.Google Scholar

Maddox, R. L., Responsible Grace: John Wesley’s Practical Theology. Nashville, TN: Kingswood Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Maffeis, A., ‘La giustificazione nel dialogo ecumenico: Chiarificazioni e nodi irrisolti’, RdT 37 (1996), 623–45.Google Scholar

Maffeis, A., Giustificazione: Percorsi teologici nel dialogo tra le Chiese. Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo Edizioni, 1998.Google Scholar

Maffeis, A., ‘La teologia paulina nella riforma cattolica del XVI secolo: Gasparo Contarini e il Colloquio di Religione di Regensburg (1541)’, in Ghiberti, G., ed., Paolo di Tarso a 2000 anni dalla nascita. Turin: Effatà Editrice, 2009, 279–314.Google Scholar

Mahlmann, T., ‘Zur Geschichte der Formel”Articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesiae”’, LuThK 17 (1993), 187–94.Google Scholar

Mäkinen, V., ed., Lutheran Reformation and the Law. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Mallinson, J., Faith, Reason, and Revelation in Theodore Beza 1519–1605. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Malloy, C. J., ‘The Nature of Justifying Grace: A Lacuna in the Joint Declaration’, The Thomist 65 (2001), 93–120.Google Scholar

Malloy, C. J., Engrafted into Christ: A Critique of the Joint Declaration. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.Google Scholar

Malý, T., ‘Early Modern Purgatory: Reformation Debates and Post-Tridentine Change’, ARG 106 (2015), 242–72.Google Scholar

Mannermaa, T., Christ Present in Faith: Luther’s View of Justification. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Mara, M. G., Paolo di Tarso e il suo epistolario. L’Aquila: Japadre Editore, 1983.Google Scholar

Mara, M. G., Agostino interprete di Paolo. Milan: Paoline, 1993.Google Scholar

Marcolino, V., Das Alte Testament in der Heilsgeschichte: Untersuchung zum dogmatischen Verständnis des Alten Testaments als heilsgeschichtliche Periode nach Alexander von Hales. Münster: Aschendorff, 1970.Google Scholar

Marenbon, J., From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre: Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Marenbon, J., Medieval Philosophy: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Mariña, J., ‘Kant on Grace: A Reply to His Critics’, RelSt 33 (1997), 379–400.Google Scholar

Markschies, C. ‘Does It Make Sense to Speak about a “Hellenization of Christianity” in Antiquity?’, CHRC 92 (2012), 5–34.Google Scholar

Markus, G., ‘Pelagianism and the “Common Celtic Church”’, Innes Review 56 (2005), 165–213.Google Scholar

Markus, R. A., ‘The Problem of Self-Definition: From Sect to Church’, in Sanders, E. P., ed., Jewish and Christian Self-Definition. 2 vols. London: SCM Press, 1980–2, vol. 1, 1–15.Google Scholar

Markus, R. A., ‘Pelagianism: Britain and the Continent’, JEH 37 (1986), 191–204.Google Scholar

Marranzini, A., ‘Il problem della giustificazione nell’evoluzione del pensiero di Seripando’, in Cestaro, A., ed., Geronimo Seripando e la chiesa del suo tempo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteraturam, 1997, 227–69.Google Scholar

Marshall, P., ‘(Re)Defining the English Reformation’, JBS 48, no. 3 (2009), 564–86.Google Scholar

Martens, G., Die Rechtfertigung des Sünders: Rettungshandeln Gottes oder historisches Interpretament? Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992.Google Scholar

Martin, C. G., ‘Experimental Predestination in Donne’s Holy Sonnets: Self-Ministry and the Early Seventeenth-Century “Via Media”’, StPh 110 (2013), 350–81.Google Scholar

Martin, R. M., La controverse sur le péché originel au début du XIVe siècle. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1930.Google Scholar

Marx, C. W., The Devil’s Rights and the Redemption in the Literature of Medieval England. Cambridge: Brewer, 1995.Google Scholar

Maslow, B., ‘The Limits of Platonism: Gregory of Nazianzus and the Invention of Theōsis’, GRBSt 52 (2012), 440–68.Google Scholar

Mason, M. W., ‘John Owen’s Doctrine of Union with Christ in Relation to His Contributions to Seventeenth Century Debates Concerning Eternal Justification’, ER 1 (2009), 46–69.Google Scholar

Matheson, P., The Imaginative World of the Reformation. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar

Matheson, P., The Rhetoric of the Reformation. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Matlock, R. B., ‘Almost Cultural Studies? Reflections on the “New Perspective” on Paul’, in Exum, J. C. and Moore, S. D., eds, Biblical Studies/Cultural Studies: The Third Sheffield Colloquium. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998, 433–59.Google Scholar

Matlock, R. B., ‘Zeal for Paul but Not according to Knowledge: Douglas Campbell’s War on “Justification Theory”’, JSNT 34 (2011), 115–49.Google Scholar

Mattes, M. C., ed., Twentieth-Century Lutheran Theologians. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.Google Scholar

Mattes, M. C., ‘Luther on Justification as Forensic and Effective’, in Kolb, R., Dingel, I. and Batka, L., eds, Oxford Handbook of Martin Luther’s Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 264–73.Google Scholar

Matthias, M., ‘Ordo Salutis: Zur Geschichte eines dogmatischen Begriffs’, ZKG 115 (2004), 318–46.Google Scholar

Maul, S. M., ‘Der assyrische König: Hüter der Weltordnung’, in Watanabe, K., ed., Priests and Officials in the Ancient Near East. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 1999, 201–14.Google Scholar

Maurer, A., The Philosophy of William of Ockham in the Light of Its Principles. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1999.Google Scholar

Maurer, E., Rechtfertigung: konfessionstrennend oder konfessionsverbindend? Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999.Google Scholar

Maurer, W., Der junge Melanchthon zwischen Humanismus und Reformation 2: Der Theologe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1969.Google Scholar

Maury, J.-P., À l’origine de la recherche scientifique: Mersenne. Paris: Vuibert, 2003.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. L., ‘Shaping the Sick Soul: Reshaping the Identity of John Chrysostom’, in Dunn, G. D. and Mayer, W., eds, Christians Shaping Identity from the Roman Empire to Byzantium. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 140–64.Google Scholar

Mayer, A. C., ‘Dissens über den Konsens? Modelle ökumenischer Hermeneutik auf dem Prüfstand’, ÖR 52 (2003), 157–73.Google Scholar

Mayer, A. C., ‘Current Theological Developments in Justification: A Roman Catholic Perspective’, Reformed World 65 (2015), 1–20.Google Scholar

Mayer, W., ‘John Chrysostom: Moral Philosopher and Physician of the Soul’, in Costache, D. and Baghos, M., eds, John Chrysostom: Past, Present, Future. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies, 2017, 193–216.Google Scholar

McAdoo, H. R., The Structure of Caroline Moral Theology. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1949.Google Scholar

McClenahan, M., Jonathan Edwards and Justification by Faith. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

McClymond, M. J., and McDermott, G. R., The Theology of Jonathan Edwards. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

McCord Adams, M., ‘The Structure of Ockham’s Moral Theory’, FS 46 (1986), 1–35.Google Scholar

McCord Adams, M., Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

McCormack, B. L., Karl Barth’s Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development, 1909‒1936. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

McCue, J. F., ‘Double Justification at the Council of Trent: Piety and Theology in Sixteenth Century Roman Catholicism’, in Lindberg, C., ed., Piety, Politics and Ethics. Reformation Studies in Honor of George Wolfgang Forell. Kirksville: Sixteenth Century Journal, 1984, 39–56.Google Scholar

McDermott, G. R., ‘Poverty, Patriotism, and National Covenant: Jonathan Edwards and Public Life’, JRE 31 (2003), 229–251.Google Scholar

McGiffert, M., ‘The Perkinsian Moment of Federal Theology’, CThJ 29 (1994), 117–48.Google Scholar

McGiffert, M., ‘Henry Hammond and Covenant Theology’, ChH 74 (2005), 255–85.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘The Anti-Pelagian Structure of “Nominalist” Doctrines of Justification’, EThL 57 (1981), 107–19.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘“Augustinianism?” A Critical Assessment of the So-Called “Medieval Augustinian Tradition” on Justification’, Augustiniana 31 (1981), 247–67.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Justification: Barth, Trent and Küng’, SJTh 34 (1981), 517–29.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Rectitude: The Moral Foundations of Anselm of Canterbury’s Soteriology’, DR 99 (1981), 201–13.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Forerunners of the Reformation? A Critical Examination of the Evidence for Precursors of the Reformation Doctrines of Justification’, HThR 75 (1982), 219–42.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Humanist Elements in the Early Reformed Doctrine of Justification’, ARG 73 (1982), 5–30.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Justice and Justification: Semantic and Juristic Aspects of the Christian Doctrine of Justification’, SJTh 35 (1982), 403–18.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘“The Righteousness of God” from Augustine to Luther’, StTh 36 (1982), 63–78.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Divine Justice and Divine Equity in the Controversy between Augustine and Julian of Eclanum’, DR 101 (1983), 312–19.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Karl Barth and the Articulus Iustificationis: The Significance of His Critique of Ernst Wolf within the Context of His Theological Method’, ThZ 39 (1983), 349–61.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Mira et nova diffinitio iustitiae: Luther and Scholastic Doctrines of Justification’, ARG 74 (1983), 37–60.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘The Influence of Aristotelian Physics upon St Thomas Aquinas’ Discussion of the “Processus Iustificationis”’, RThAM 51 (1984), 223–9.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Karl Barth als Aufklärer? Der Zusammenhang seiner Lehre vom Werke Christi mit der Erwählungslehre’, KuD 30 (1984), 273–83.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Homo assumptus? A Study in the Christology of the Via Moderna, with Particular Reference to William of Ockham’, EThL 61 (1985), 283–97.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘John Calvin and Late Medieval Thought: A Study in Late Medieval Influences upon Calvin’s Theological Thought’, ARG 77 (1986), 58–78.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Some Observations concerning the Soteriology of the Via Moderna’, RThAM 52 (1986), 182–93.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Dogma und Gemeinde: Zur soziologische Funktion des christlichen Dogmas’, Kerygma und Dogma 36 (1990), 24–43.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., ‘Justification and the Reformation: The Significance of the Doctrine of Justification by Faith to Sixteenth Century Urban Communities’, ARG 81 (1990), 5–19.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., Luther’s Theology of the Cross: Martin Luther’s Theological Breakthrough. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., The Intellectual Origins of the European Reformation. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., Christianity’s Dangerous Idea: The Protestant Revolution. New York: HarperOne, 2007.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., Heresy. San Francisco: HarperOne, 2009.Google Scholar

McGrath, A. E., Emil Brunner: A Reappraisal. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.Google Scholar

McGuckin, J. A., St. Cyril of Alexandria: The Christological Controversy. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McKelvey, R. J., ‘“That Error and Pillar of Antinomianism”: Eternal Justification’, in Haykin, M. A. G. and Jones, M., eds, Drawn into Controversie: Reformed Theological Diversity and Debates within Seventeenth-Century British Puritanism. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011, 223–62.Google Scholar

McNamara, M., ‘The Irish Tradition of Biblical Exegesis’, in van Riel, G., Steel, C. and McEvoy, J., eds, Iohannes Scottus Eriugena: The Bible and Hermeneutics. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996, 25–54.Google Scholar

McNutt, J. P., Calvin Meets Voltaire: The Clergy of Geneva in the Age of Enlightenment, 1685–1798. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar

McSheffrey, S., ‘Heresy, Orthodoxy and English Vernacular Religion 1480–1525’, PP 186 (2005), 47–80.Google Scholar

McSorley, H. J., Luther – Right or Wrong? An Ecumenical–Theological Study of Luther’s Major Work, The Bondage of the Will. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House, 1969.Google Scholar

McWilliam, J., ‘Letters to Demetrias: A Sidebar in the Pelagian Controversy: Helenae, amicae meae’, TJTh 16 (2000), 131–9.Google Scholar

Meconi, D. V., The One Christ: Saint Augustine’s Theology of Deification. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Meinert, J., The Love of God Poured Out: Grace and the Gifts of the Holy Spirit in St. Thomas Aquinas. Steubenville, OH: Emmaus Academic, 2017.Google Scholar

Mervaud, C., ‘Quelques aperçus sur la théologie et les théologiens dans le Dictionnaire philosophique’, Littératures 31 (1994), 79–90.Google Scholar

Meszaros, A., ‘Revelation in George Tyrrell, Neo-Scholasticism, and Dei Verbum’, Angelicum 91 (2014), 535–68.Google Scholar

Methuen, C., ‘“These Four Letters s o l a Are Not There”: Language and Theology in Luther’s Translation of the New Testament’, SCH 53 (2017), 146–63.Google Scholar

Metzger, B., and Ehrman, B., The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. R., ‘Athanasius’ Use of Paul in His Doctrine of Salvation’, VigChr 52 (1998), 146–71.Google Scholar

Michalson, G. E., Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Milton, A., ‘Unsettled Reformations: 1603–1662’, in Milton, A., ed., The Oxford History of Anglicanism. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, vol. 1, 63–83.Google Scholar

Mitzka, F., ‘Die Lehre des hl. Bonaventura von der Vorbereitung auf die heiligmachende Gnade’, ZKTh 50 (1926), 27–72, 220–52.Google Scholar

Mitzka, F., ‘Die Anfänge der Konkurslehre im 13. Jahrhundert’, ZKTh 54 (1930), 161–79.Google Scholar

Moberly, R. W. L., ‘Abraham’s Righteousness (Genesis XV 6)’, in Emerton, J. A., ed., Studies in the Pentateuch. Leiden: Brill, 1990, 103–30.Google Scholar

Moberly, R. W. L., ‘Whose Justice? Which Righteousness? The Interpretation of Isaiah V.16’, VT 51 (2001), 55–68.Google Scholar

Modalsi, O., Das Gericht nach den Werken: Ein Beitrag zu Luthers Lehre vom Gesetz. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1963.Google Scholar

Moeller, B., ‘Die Ursprünge der reformierten Kirche’, ThLZ 100 (1975), 642–53.Google Scholar

Moeller, B., and Stackmann, K., Luder ‒ Luther ‒ Eleutherius. Erwägungen zu Luthers Namen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1981.Google Scholar

Möllenbeck, T., Gerechtfertigt durch Erfahrung? John Henry Newmans ‘Conversion Narratives’ und die Rolle von Luther und Augustinus in seiner Rechtfertigungslehre. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2018.Google Scholar

Molteni, P., Roberto Holcot O.P. Dottrina della grazia e della giustificazione. Pinerolo: Editrice Alzani, 1968.Google Scholar

Moltmann, J., ‘Prädestination und Heilsgeschichte bei Moyse Amyraut’, ZKG 65 (1954), 270–303.Google Scholar

Montefiore, C. G., ‘Rabbinic Judaism and the Epistles of St Paul’, Jewish Quarterly Review 13 (1900–1), 161–217.Google Scholar

Moo, D. J., ‘John Barclay’s Paul and the Gift and the New Perspective on Paul’, Themelios 41 (2016), 279–88.Google Scholar

Moore, R. K., Rectification (‘Justification’) in Paul, in Historical Perspective, and in the English Bible. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Morales, J., ‘Newman and the Problem of Justification’, in Jaki, S. L., ed., Newman Today: Papers Presented at a Conference on John Henry Cardinal Newman. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1989, 143–64.Google Scholar

Morgan, R. C., ‘Ferdinand Christian Baur’, in Smart, N., Clayton, J., Sherry, P. and Katz, S. T., eds, Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, vol. 1, 261–89.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. J., ‘Society, Identity, and Ethnicity in the Hellenic World’, in Hockey, K. M. and Horrell, D. G., eds, Ethnicity, Race, Religion: Identities and Ideologies in Early Jewish and Christian Texts, and in Modern Biblical Interpretation. London: T&T Clark, 2018, 23–45.Google Scholar

Morse, C., Not Every Spirit: A Dogmatics of Christian Disbelief. 2nd edn. New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

Mortimer, S., Reason and Religion in the English Revolution: The Challenge of Socinianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Mosser, C., ‘The Greatest Possible Blessing: Calvin and Deification’, SJTh 55 (2002), 36–57.Google Scholar

Mühling, M., Versöhnendes Handeln – Handeln in Versöhnung: Gottes Opfer an die Menschen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005.Google Scholar

Müller, J., Wiedergeburt und Heiligung: Die Bedeutung der Struktur von Zeit für Schleiermachers Rechtfertigungslehre. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2005.Google Scholar

Müller, M., The First Bible of the Church: A Plea for the Septuagint. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Müller, O., Die Rechtfertigungslehre nominalistischer Reformationsgegner, Bartholomäus Arnoldi von Usingen und Kaspar Schatzgeyer, über Erbsünde, erste Rechtfertigung und Taufe. Breslau: Müller & Seiffert, 1940.Google Scholar

Muller, R. A., ‘The Use and Abuse of a Document: Beza’s Tabula Praedestinationis, the Bolsec Controversy, and the Origins of Reformed Orthodoxy’, in Trueman, C. R. and Clark, R. S., eds, Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999, 33–61.Google Scholar

Muller, R. A., ‘Divine Covenants Absolute and Conditional: John Cameron and the Early Orthodox Development of Reformed Covenant Theology’, MJT 17 (2006), 11–56.Google Scholar

Muller, R. A., Calvin and the Reformed Tradition on the Work of Christ and the Order of Salvation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2012.Google Scholar

Müller, S., ‘Sprache, Wirklichkeit und Allmacht Gottes. Das Bild der via moderna bei Johannes Capreolus und seine Bedeutung für die Schulbildung im 15. Jahrhundert’, in Aertsen, J. A. and Pickavé, M., eds, Herbst des Mittelalters? Fragen zur Bewertung des 14. und 15. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004, 157–72.Google Scholar

Mullett, M. A., The Catholic Reformation. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Murphy, K., and Traninger, A., eds, The Emergence of Impartiality. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Mütel, M., Mit den Kirchenvätern gegen Martin Luther? Die Debatten um Tradition und auctoritas patrum auf dem Konzil von Trient. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2017.Google Scholar

Myers, B., ‘Faith as Self-Understanding: Towards a Post-Barthian Appreciation of Rudolf Bultmann’, IJSTh 10 (2008), 21–35.Google Scholar

Naselli, A. D., ‘John Owen’s Argument for Definite Atonement in The Death of Death in the Death of Christ: A Summary and Evaluation’, SBJTh 14 (2010), 60–82.Google Scholar

Natali, M., Epistolario tra Seneca e San Paolo. Milan: Rusconi, 1995.Google Scholar

Neill, S. C., The Interpretation of the New Testament, 1861–1961. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Nellas, P., Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Neuser, W. H., ‘Calvins Urteil über den Rechtfertigungsartikel des Regensburger Buches’, in Greschat, M. and Goeters, J. F. G., eds, Reformation und Humanismus; Robert Stupperich zum 65. Geburtstag. Witten: Luther Verlag, 1969, 176–94.Google Scholar

Neuser, W. H., Die reformatorische Wende bei Zwingli. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar

Neusner, J., ‘Mr Sanders’ Pharisees and Mine: A Response to E. P. Sanders, Jewish Law from Jesus to the Mishnah’, SJTh 44 (1991), 73–95.Google Scholar

Nicholls, D., ‘Heresy and Protestantism, 1520–1542: Questions of Perception and Communication’, FrHist 10 (1996), 182–205.Google Scholar

Niehr, H., ‘The Constitutive Principles for Establishing Justice and Order in Northwest Semitic Societies with Special Reference to Ancient Israel and Judah’, ZABRG 3 (1997), 112–30.Google Scholar

Niesel, W., ‘Calvin wider Osianders Rechtfertigungslehre’, ZKG 46 (1982), 410–30.Google Scholar

Nimmo, P. T., ‘Schleiermacher on Justification: A Departure from the Reformation?’, SJTh 66 (2013), 50–73.Google Scholar

Noone, T. B., ‘The Franciscans and Epistemology: Reflections on the Roles of Bonaventure and Scotus’, in Houser, R. E., ed., Medieval Masters: Essays in Memory of E. A. Synan. Houston, TX: University of St. Thomas, 1999, 63–90.Google Scholar

Numao, J. K., ‘Reconciling Human Freedom and Sin: A Note on Locke’s Paraphrase’, Locke Studies 10 (2010), 95–112.Google Scholar

Nüssel, F., Bund und Versöhnung: Zur Begründung der Dogmatik bei Johann Franz Buddeus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar

Nüssel, F., Allein aus Glauben: Zur Entwicklung der Rechtfertigungslehre in der Konkordistischen und frühen Nachkonkordistischen Theologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.Google Scholar

Nygren, A., ‘Simul iustus et peccator bei Augustin und Luther’, ZSTh 16 (1940), 364–79.Google Scholar

Nygren, A., Agape and Eros. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Nygren, G., Das Prädestinationsproblem an der Theologie Augustins. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1956.Google Scholar

Oakley, F., ‘Pierre d’Ailly and the Absolute Power of God: Another Note on the Theology of Nominalism’, HThR 56 (1963), 59–73.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., Archbishop Thomas Bradwardine: A Fourteenth Century Augustinian. Utrecht: Kemink & Zoon, 1957.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Facientibus quod in se est Deus non denegat gratiam: Robert Holcot O.P. and the Beginnings of Luther’s Theology’, HThR 55 (1962), 317–42.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Das tridentinische Rechtfertigungsdekret im Lichte spätmittelalterlicher Theologie’, ZThK 61 (1964), 251–82.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., Forerunners of the Reformation: The Shape of Late Medieval Thought. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘“Iustitia Christi” and “Iustitia Dei”: Luther and the Scholastic Doctrines of Justification’, HThR 59 (1966), 1–26.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Wir sind pettler. Hoc est verum: Bund und Gnade in der Theologie des Mittelalters und der Reformation’, ZKG 78 (1967), 232–52.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Headwaters of the Reformation: Initia Lutheri – Initia Reformationis’, in Oberman, H. A., ed., Luther and the Dawn of the Modern Era. Leiden: Brill, 1974, 40–88.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., Werden und Wertung der Reformation: Vom Wegestreit zum Glaubenskampf. Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Duns Scotus, Nominalism, and the Council of Trent’, in The Dawn of the Reformation: Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1992, 204–33.Google Scholar

Oberman, H. A., ‘Calvin and Farel: The Dynamics of Legitimation in Early Calvinism’, RRR 1 (1999), 7–40.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. A., Restoring the Right Relationship: The Bible on Divine Righteousness. Mulgrave, Vic.: Garratt Publishing Pty, 2014.Google Scholar

O’Brien, S., ‘A Transatlantic Community of Saints: The Great Awakening and the First Evangelical Network, 1735–1755’, AHR 91 (1986), 811–32.Google Scholar

O’Callaghan, P., Fides Christi: The Justification Debate. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Offermann, D., Schleiermachers Einleitung in die Glaubenslehre: Eine Untersuchung der ‘Lehnsätze’. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1969.Google Scholar

Ogliari, D., Gratia et Certamen: The Relationship between Grace and Free Will in the Discussion of Augustine with the So-Called ‘Semipelagians’. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar

Ohst, M., ‘Ritschl als Dogmenhistoriker’, in Ringleben, J., ed., Gottes Reich Und Menschliche Freiheit: Ritschl-Kolloquium. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990, 112–30.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, J. J., and Reno, R. R., Sanctified Vision: An Introduction to Early Christian Interpretation of the Bible. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Olazarán, J., ‘La controversia Soto – Caterino – Vega sobre la certeza de la gracia’, EE 16 (1942), 145–83.Google Scholar

Olazarán, J., ‘En el IV centenario de un voto tridentino del jesuito Alfonso Salmeron sobre la doble justiciar’, EE 20 (1946), 211–40.Google Scholar

Olazarán, J., ‘Voto tridentino de Gentian Hervet sobre la certeza de la gracia y la doble justicia’, ATG 9 (1946), 127–59.Google Scholar

Olazarán, J., Documentos inéditos tridentinos sobre la justificación. Madrid: Ediciones Fax, 1957.Google Scholar

O’Leary, J. S., ‘Impeded Witness: Newman Against Luther on Justification’, in Nicholls, D. and Kerr, F., eds, John Henry Newman: Reason, Rhetoric and Romanticism. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1991, 153–93.Google Scholar

Olley, J. W., ‘Righteousness’ in the Septuagint of Isaiah: A Contextual Study. Missoula, MT: Society of Biblical Literature, 1979.Google Scholar

Olley, J. W. ‘The Translator of the Septuagint of Isaiah and “Righteousness”’, BIOSCS 13 (1980), 58–74.Google Scholar

Olofsson, S., The Septuagint Version: A Guide to the Translation Technique of the Septuagint. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1990.Google Scholar

Olsen, A., ‘Martin Chemnitz and the Council of Trent’, Dialog 2 (1963), 60–7.Google Scholar

Olson, D. T., ‘The Book of Judges’, in Keck, L. E., ed., The New Interpreter’s Bible. 10 vols. Nashville: Abingdon, 1998, vol. 2, 721–888.Google Scholar

Oltra, M., ‘La certeza del estado de gracia según Andrés de Vega. Aportación científica al decreto de la Justificación del concilio de Trento’, VyV 3 (1945), 46–98, 325–56, 502–43.Google Scholar

O’Malley, J. W., Trent and All That: Renaming Catholicism in the Early Modern Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

O’Malley, J. W., Trent: What Happened at the Council. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Opitz, P., ‘Heinrich Bullinger und Martin Luther: Gemeinsamkeiten und Differenzen’, EvTh 64 (2004), 105–16.Google Scholar

Oropeza, B. J., Jews, Gentiles, and the Opponents of Paul: The Pauline Letters. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.Google Scholar

Ortmann, V., ‘Martin Bucers Bemühungen um Reformation und Einheit der Kirche bei den Religionsgesprächen, 1540/41’, in Arnold, M. und Hamm, B., eds, Martin Bucer zwischen Luther und Zwingli. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003, 127–46.Google Scholar

Osborn, E., Tertullian: First Theologian of the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Osborne, T. M., Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, & William of Ockham. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Oswalt, J. N., ‘Righteousness in Isaiah: A Study of the Function of Chapters 55–66 in the Present Structure of the Book’, in Broyles, C. C. and Evans, C. A., eds, Writing and Reading the Scroll of Isaiah. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2014, vol. 1, 177–91.Google Scholar

Otten, W., ‘Between Praise and Appraisal: Medieval Guidelines for the Assessment of Augustine’s Intellectual Legacy’, AugSt 43 (2012), 201–18.Google Scholar

Pabel, H. M., ‘Peter Canisius and the “Truly Catholic” Augustine’, ThSt 71 (2010), 903–25.Google Scholar

Packer, J. I., A Quest for Godliness: The Puritan Vision of the Christian Life. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Packer, J. I., The Redemption & Restoration of Man in the Thought of Richard Baxter. Vancouver, BC: Regent College Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar

Packer, J. W., The Transformation of Anglicanism 1643–1660, with Special Reference to Henry Hammond. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Padovese, L., ‘L’antipaulinisme chrétien au II^e siècle’, RSR 90 (2002), 399–422.Google Scholar

Paget, J. C., ‘The Reception of Baur in Britain’, in Bauspiess, M., Landmesser, C. and Lincicum, D., eds, Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 307–54.Google Scholar

Palmer, M. F., ‘Paul Tillich’s critique of Bultmann’s Christology’, HeyJ 20 (1979), 279–89.Google Scholar

Palmer, P. F., ‘The Theology of Res et Sacramentum with Particular Emphasis on Its Application to Penance’, Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 14 (1959), 120–41.Google Scholar

Palmquist, S. R., ‘Kant’s Ethics of Grace: Perspectival Solutions to the Moral Difficulties with Divine Assistance’, JR 90 (2010), 530–53.Google Scholar

Palmquist, S. R., ‘What Is Kantian Gesinnung? On the Priority of Volition over Metaphysics and Psychology in Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason’, Kantian Review 20 (2015), 235–64.Google Scholar

Pani, G., ‘L’Opera omnia di S. Agostino in Lutero e ne Riformatori’, Augustinianum 40 (2000), 519–66.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, W., Die Prädestinationslehre des Duns Skotus in Zusammenhang der scholastischen Lehrentwicklung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1954.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, W., ‘Das Verhältnis zwischen der Akzeptationslehre des Duns Scotus und der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre’, in Bérubé, C., ed., Regnum hominis et regnum Dei: Acti quarti congressus Scotistici Internationalis. Rome: Societas Internationalis Scotistica, 1978, 213–18.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, W., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre im ökumenische Gespräch’, ZThK 88 (1991), 232–46.Google Scholar

Pannenberg, W., Hintergründe des Streites um die Rechtfertigungslehre in der evangelischen Theologie. Munich: Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2000.Google Scholar

Parker, K., ‘Newman’s Individualistic Use of the Caroline Divines in the Via Media’, in Magill, G., ed., Discourse and Context: An Interdisciplinary Study of John Henry Newman. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993, 33–42.Google Scholar

Parry, M., ‘William Laud and the Parliamentary Politics of 1628–9’, Parliamentary History 36 (2017), 137–58.Google Scholar

Pas, P., ‘La doctrine de la double justice au Concile de Trente’, EThL 30 (1954), 5–53.Google Scholar

Pauls, R., ‘The World as Sin and Grace: The Theology of Melanchthon’s Loci communes of 1521’, in MacDonald, A., von Martels, Z. R. W. M. and Veenstra, J., eds, Christian Humanism: Essays in Honour of Arjo Vanderjagt. Leiden: Brill, 2009, 469‒78.Google Scholar

Pauw, A. P., The Supreme Harmony of All: The Trinitarian Theology of Jonathan Edwards. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar

Pederson, R. J., Unity in Diversity: English Puritans and the Puritan Reformation, 1603–1689. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Pelikan, J., Christianity and Classical Culture: The Metamorphosis of Natural Theology in the Christian Encounter with Hellenism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Pelteret, D., Slavery in Early Medieval England: from the Reign of Alfred until the Twelfth Century. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Pelzer, A., ‘Les 51 articles de Guillaume d’Occam censurés en Avignon en 1326’, RHE 18 (1922), 240–70.Google Scholar

Peñamaria de Llano, A., La salvación por la fe: La noción ‘fides’ in Hilario de Poitiers: Estudio filólogico-teológico. Burgos: Aldecoa, 1981.Google Scholar

Peretto, E. M., La giustizia: Ricerca su gli autori cristiani del secondo secolo. Rome: Edizioni Marianum, 1977.Google Scholar

Pérez Camarma, A., ‘Los primeros alumbrados del reino de Toledo: un problema social judeo-converso’, Libros de la Corte 8 (2014), 8–26.Google Scholar

Pergamo, B., ‘Il desiderio innato del soprannaturale nelli questioni inediti di Oddone Rigaldo’, Studi Francescani 32 (1935), 414–46; 33 (1936), 76–108.Google Scholar

Perry, J. F., ‘Newman’s Treatment of Luther in the Lectures on Justification’, JES 36 (1999), 303–17.Google Scholar

Perszyk, K. J., Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Pesch, O. H., Die Theologie der Rechtfertigung bei Martin Luther und Thomas von Aquin. Mainz: Grünewald, 1967.Google Scholar

Pesch, O. H., ‘The Canons of the Tridentine Decree on Justification: To Whom Did They Apply? To Whom Do They Apply Today?’, in Lehmann, K., Root, M. and Rusch, W. G., eds, Justification by Faith. New York: Continuum, 1997, 175–216.Google Scholar

Pesch, O. H., ‘La réponse du Concile de Trente (1545–1563): les décisions doctrinales contre la Réforme et les conséquences’, Irénikon 73 (2000), 5–38.Google Scholar

Pesch, O. H., and Peters, A., Einführung in die Lehre von Gnade un Rechtfertigung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981.Google Scholar

Peschke, E., ‘Speners Wiederburtslehre und ihr Verhältnis zu Franckes Lehre von der Bekehrung’, in Zeller, W., ed., Traditio – Krisis – Renovatio aus theologische Sicht. Marburg: Elwert, 1976, 206–24.Google Scholar

Peters, A., ‘Luthers Turmerlebnis’, ZSTh 3 (1961), 203–36.Google Scholar

Peters, A., Glaube und Werk: Luthers Rechtfertigungslehre im Lichte der heiligen Schrift. 2nd edn. Berlin: Lutherisches Verlagshaus, 1967.Google Scholar

Pettegree, A., Marian Protestantism: Six Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Pettegree, A., ‘A. G. Dickens and His Critics: A New Narrative of the English Reformation’, HR 77 (2004), 24–58.Google Scholar

Pettit, N., The Heart Prepared: Grace and Conversion in Puritan Spiritual Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Peura, S., Luther und Theosis: Vergöttlichung als Thema der abendländischen Theologie. Helsinki: Luther-Akademie Ratzeburg, 1990.Google Scholar

Peura, S., ‘Gott und Mensch in der Unio: Die Unterschiede im Rechfertigungsverständnis bei Osiander und Luther’, in Repo, M. and Vinke, R., eds, Unio: Gott und Mensch in der nachreformatorischen Theologie. Helsinki: Suomalainen Teologinen Kirjallisuusseura, 1996, 33–61.Google Scholar

Peyronel Rambaldi, S., ‘Ancora sull’evangelismo italiano: Categoria o invenzione storiografica?’, Società e storia 5 (1982), 935–67.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, G., ‘Das Ringen des jungen Luthers um die Gerechtigkeit Gottes’, LuJ 26 (1959), 25–55.Google Scholar

Pfizenmaier, M., Mit Vernunft glauben, Fides Ratione Formata: Die Umformung der Rechtfertigungslehre in der Theologie der deutschen Aufklärung dargestellt am Werk Johann Gottlieb Töllners (1724–1774). Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

Pfnür, V., Einig in der Rechtfertigungslehre? Die Rechtfertigungslehre der Confessio Augustana (1530) und die Stellungsnahme der katholischen Kontroverstheologie zwischen 1530 und 1535. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1970.Google Scholar

Pfnür, V., ‘Zur Verurteilung der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre auf dem Konzil von Trient’, AHC 8 (1976), 407–28.Google Scholar

Pfürtner, S., ‘Die Heilsgewissheit nach Luther and die Hoffnungsgewissheit nach Thomas von Aquin’, Catholica 13 (1959), 182–99.Google Scholar

Philips, G., ‘La justification luthérienne et la Concile de Trente’, EThL 47 (1971), 340–58.Google Scholar

Philips, G., ‘La théologie de la grâce chez les préscholastiques’, EThL 48 (1972), 479–508.Google Scholar

Philips, G., ‘La théologie de la grâce dans la “Summa Fratris Alexandris”’, EThL 49 (1973), 100–23.Google Scholar

Philips, G., L’union personnelle avec le Dieu vivant: essai sur l’origine et le sens de la grâce créée. Gembloux: Duculot, 1974.Google Scholar

Picard, J.-M., ‘L’exégèse irlandaise des épîtres de Paul: les gloses latines et gaëliques de Würzburg’, RechAug 33 (2003), 155–67.Google Scholar

Pierce, R. A., Pier Paolo Vergerio. Rome: Edizioni di Storia et Letteratura, 2003.Google Scholar

Pietri, C., Roma christiana: recherches sur l’Église de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311–440). Rome: École française de Rome, 1976.Google Scholar

Pilnei, O., and Rothkegel, M., eds, Aus Glauben gerecht: Weltweite Wirkung und okumenische Rezeption der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2017.Google Scholar

Pilvousek, J., ‘Jodocus Trutfetter (1460‒1519) und der Erfurter Nominalismus’, in von der Pforden, D., ed., Große Denker Erfurts und der Erfurter Universität. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002, 96–117.Google Scholar

Pinomaa, L., Der existenzielle Charakter der Theologie Luthers: Das Hervorbrechen der Theologie der Anfechtung und ihre Bedeutung für das Lutherverständnis. Helsinki: Akateeminen Kirjakauppa, 1940.Google Scholar

Pipkin, H. W., and Yoder, J. H., eds, Balthasar Hubmaier: Theologian of Anabaptism. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Pitkin, B., What Pure Eyes Could See: Calvin’s Doctrine of Faith in Its Exegetical Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Plumer, E. A., Augustine’s Commentary on Galatians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Historiography and Enlightenment: A View of Their History’, Modern Intellectual History 5 (2008), 83–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Põder, C. S.-V., ‘Die Lutherrenaissance im Kontext des Reformationsjubiläums: Gericht und Rechtfertigung bei Karl Holl, 1917–1921’, KZG 26 (2013), 191–200.Google Scholar

Põder, C. S.-V., ‘Gewisse oder Gebet? Die Rezeption der Römerbriefvorlesung Luthers bei Karl Holl und Rudolf Hermann’, in Helmer, C. and Holm, B. K., eds, Lutherrenaissance: Past and Present. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015, 54–73.Google Scholar

Pöhl, I. H., Das Problem des Naturrechts bei Emil Brunner. Zurich: Zwingli Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar

Pollock, D. M., Early Stuart Polemical Hermeneutics: Andrew Willet’s 1611 Hexapla on Romans. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.Google Scholar

Porro, P., ‘Henry of Ghent on Ordained and Absolute Power’, in Guldentops, G. and Steel, C., eds, Henry of Ghent and the Transformation of Scholastic Thought. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003, 387–408.Google Scholar

Porter, S. E., and Yoon, D. I., eds, Paul and Gnosis. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. and Swaab, R. I., ‘The Dynamics of Personal and Social Identity Formation’, in Postmes, T. and Jetten, J., eds, Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity. London: Sage, 2006, 215–36.Google Scholar

Prenner, K., ‘Werteordnung des Alten Orients und Ägyptens’, in Grabner-Haider, A., Ethos der Weltkulturen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006, 159–78.Google Scholar

Prenter, R. Der barmherzige Richter: Iustitia Dei passiva in Luthers Dictata super Psalterium 1513–1515. Copenhagen: Aarhus, 1961.Google Scholar

Preuss, R. D., ‘The Justification of a Sinner before God as Taught in Later Lutheran Orthodoxy’, SJTh 13 (1960), 262–77.Google Scholar

Priddat, B. P., ‘Schuld und Schulden: Über eine abendländische Transformation’, in Pfleiderer, G., Seele, P. and Matern, H., eds, Kapitalismus – eine Religion in der Krise: Aspekte von Risiko, Vertrauen, Schuld. Zurich: Pano Verlag, 2015, 141–70.Google Scholar

Prosperi, A., Tra evangelismo e controriforma: Gian Matteo Giberti (1495–1543). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2011.Google Scholar

Quesnel, M., Paul et les commencements du christianisme. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 2008.Google Scholar

Questier, M., ‘Arminianism, Catholicism and Puritanism in England during the 1630s’, HJ 49 (2006), 53–78.Google Scholar

Quinn, P. L., ‘Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification’, Faith and Philosophy 3 (1986), 440–62.Google Scholar

Quinn, P. L., ‘Abelard on Atonement’, in Stump, E., ed., Reasoned Faith: Essays in Philosophical Theology in Honor of Norman Kretzmann. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993, 282–300.Google Scholar

Rackett, M. R., ‘What’s Wrong with Pelagianism? Augustine and Jerome on the Dangers of Pelagius and His Followers’, Augustinian Studies 33 (2002), 223–37.Google Scholar

Rahner, K., ‘Chalkedon – Ende oder Anfang?’, in Grillmeier, A. and Bacht, H., eds, Das Konzil von Chalkedon: Geschichte und Gegenwart. Würzburg: Echter-Verlag, 1951–4, 3–49.Google Scholar

Rahner, K., ‘Concerning the Relationship between Nature and Grace’, in Theological Investigations I. Baltimore: Helicon, 1961, 297–317.Google Scholar

Rahner, K., ‘Some Implications of the Scholastic Concept of Uncreated Grace’, in Theological Investigations I. Baltimore: Helicon, 1961, 319–46.Google Scholar

Rainbow, J. H., ‘Double Grace: John Calvin’s View of the Relationship of Justification and Sanctification’, Ex auditu 5 (1989), 99–105.Google Scholar

Raith, C., Aquinas and Calvin on Romans: God’s Justification and Our Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ranieri, C., ‘Premesse umanistiche alla religiosità di Vittoria Colonna’, RSLR 32 (1996), 531–48.Google Scholar

Rankin, W. D., ‘Peter Martyr Vermigli on Union with Christ’, Haddington House Journal 7 (2005), 101–24.Google Scholar

Rapa, R. K., The Meaning of ‘Works of the Law’ in Galatians and Romans. New York: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar

Raschzok, K., ‘Ein theologisches Programm für die Praxis der Kirche: Die Bedeutung des Werkes Eduard Thurneysens für eine gegenwärtig zu verantwortende Praktische Theologie’, ThLZ 120 (1995), 299–312.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, J. D. S., Wolfe, J. and Zachhuber, J., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Nineteenth-Century Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Rast, L. R., ‘Jonathan Edwards on Justification by Faith’, CThQ 72 (2008), 347–62.Google Scholar

Reasoner, M., Romans in Full Circle: A History of Interpretation. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Redwood, J., Reason, Ridicule and Religion: The Age of Enlightenment in England, 1660–1750. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Reedy, G., ‘Socinians, John Toland, and the Anglican Rationalists’, HThR 70 (1977), 285–304.Google Scholar

Regier, A., Exorbitant Enlightenment: Blake, Hamann and Anglo-German Constellations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Reid, J. A., King’s Sister ‒ Queen of Dissent: Marguerite of Navarre (1492–1549) and Her Evangelical Network. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Reston, J., Defenders of the Faith: Charles V, Suleyman the Magnificent, and the Battle for Europe, 1520–1536. New York: Penguin Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Reumann, J., ‘Justification and Justice in the New Testament’, HBTh 21 (1999), 26–45.Google Scholar

Rex, R., ‘The English Campaign against Luther in the 1520s’, TRHS 39 (1989), 85–106.Google Scholar

Rex, R., The Theology of John Fisher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rich, A., Die Anfänge der Theologie Huldrych Zwinglis. Zurich: Zwingli-Verlag, 1949.Google Scholar

Richard, M., ‘L’introduction du mot hypostase dans la théologie de l’incarnation’, MSR 2 (1945), 5–32, 243–70.Google Scholar

Richards, R. J., The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Riedl, A., ‘Die Pseudo-Augustinische Schrift “De spiritu et anima” in den Frühwerken Alberts des Grossen’, in Köhler, T. W., ed., Sapientiae procerum amore: mélanges médiévistes offerts à Dom Jean-Pierre Müller O.S.B. Rome: Editrice Anselmiana, 1974, 97–121.Google Scholar

Rief, J., Der Ordobegriff des jungen Augustinus. Paderborn: Schoningh, 1962.Google Scholar

Ries, J., Decret, F., Frend, W. H. C. and Mara, M. G., eds, Le epistole paoline nei Manichei, i Donatisti e il primo Agostino. Rome: Istituto patristico Augustinianum, 1989.Google Scholar

Riesbeck, D. J., Aristotle on Political Community. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Ritschl, A. B., Die christliche Lehre von der Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung. 3 vols. Bonn: Adolph Marcus, 1870–4.Google Scholar

Ritter, G., Studien zur Spätscholastik I: Marsilius von Inghen und die okkamistische Schule in Deutschland. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1921.Google Scholar

Ritter, G. Studien zur Spätscholastik II: Via Antiqua und Via Moderna auf den deutschen Universtitäten des XV Jahrhunderts. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1922.Google Scholar

Rivers, I., ‘Joseph Williams of Kidderminster (1692–1755) and His Journal’, Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society 7 (2005), 358–78.Google Scholar

Rivière, J., ‘Quelques antécédents patristiques de la formule “Facienti quod in se est”’, RSR 7 (1927), 93–7.Google Scholar

Rivière, J., Le dogme de la rédemption au début du moyen âge. Paris: Vrin, 1934.Google Scholar

Rivière, J., ‘Le dogme de la rédemption au XII^e siècle d’après les dernières publications’, RMAL 2 (1946), 101–12.Google Scholar

Roloff, J., ‘Die lutherische Rechtfertigungslehre und ihre biblische Grundlage’, in Kraus, W. and Niebuhr, K.-W., eds, Frühjudentum und Neues Testament im Horizont biblischer Theologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003, 275–300.Google Scholar

Roo, W. A., Grace and Original Justice according to St. Thomas. Rome: Gregorian University, 1955.Google Scholar

Roper, L., Martin Luther: Renegade and Prophet. London: Vintage Books, 2017.Google Scholar

Rosato, A., ‘The Interpretation of Anselm’s Teaching on Christ’s Satisfaction for Sin in the Franciscan Tradition from Alexander of Hales to Duns Scotus’, FS 71 (2013), 411–44.Google Scholar

Rose, M., Fides caritate formata: das Verhältnis von Glaube und Liebe in der Summa Theologiae des Thomas von Aquin. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007.Google Scholar

Rösel, M., Übersetzung als Vollendung der Auslegung: Studien zur Genesis-Septuaginta. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994.Google Scholar

Rosemann, P. W., The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, H., Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rosendal, B., ‘Guds og men-neskers retfærdighed hos Tritojesaja’, in Rosendal, B., ed., Studier i Jesajabogen, Aarhus: Universitetsforlag, 1989, 94–116.Google Scholar

Rotermund, H.-M., Orthodoxie und Pietismus: Valentin Ernst Löschers ‘Timotheus Verinus’ in der Auseinandersetzung mit der Schule August Hermann Franckes. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1960.Google Scholar

Roukema, R., The Diversity of Laws in Origen’s Commentary on Romans. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Roukema, R., ‘The Good Samaritan in Ancient Christianity’, VigChr 58 (2004), 56–74.Google Scholar

Rowe, K., ‘The Kerygma of the Earliest Church’, in Longenecker, B. and Parsons, M., eds, Beyond Bultmann: Reckoning a New Testament Theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014, 23–37.Google Scholar

Rückert, H., Die Rechtfertigungslehre auf dem Tridentinischen Konzil. Bonn: Marcus & Weber, 1925.Google Scholar

Rückert, H., Die theologische Entwicklung Gasparo Contarinis. Bonn: Marcus & Weber, 1926.Google Scholar

Rückert, H., ‘Promereri: Eine Studie zum tridentinischen Rechtfertigungsdekret als Antwort an H. A. Oberman’, ZThK 68 (1971), 162–94.Google Scholar

Ruggiero, G., The Renaissance in Italy: A Social and Cultural History of the Rinascimento. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ruokanen, M., Hermeneutics as an Ecumenical Method in the Theology of Gerhard Ebeling. Helsinki: Agricola Society, 1982.Google Scholar

Ruokanen, M., Theology of Social Life in Augustine’s De Civitate Dei. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993.Google Scholar

Rupp, E. G., The Righteousness of God: Luther Studies. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1953.Google Scholar

Rupp, E. G., Studies in the Making of the English Protestant Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Russell, C., ‘Religious Reforming Currents in Sixteenth-Century Italy: The Spirituali and the Tridentine Debates over Church Reform’, JRH 38 (2014), 437–75.Google Scholar

Russell, C., ‘Dangerous Friendships: Girolamo Seripando, Giulia Gonzaga, and the Spirituali in Tridentine Italy’, in François, W. and Soen, V., eds, The Council of Trent: Reform and Controversy in Europe and Beyond (1545–1700). 3 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, vol. 1, 249–76.Google Scholar

Russell, N., The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rydstrom-Poulsen, A., The Gracious God: Gratia in Augustine and the Twelfth Century. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 2002.Google Scholar

Ryrie, A., ‘The Strange Death of Lutheran England’, JEH 53 (2002), 64–92.Google Scholar

Ryrie, A. The Gospel and Henry VIII: Evangelicals in the Early English Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ryrie, A. Protestants: The Radicals Who Made the Modern World. London: William Collins, 2018.Google Scholar

Saak, E. L., ‘The Reception of Augustine in the Later Middle Ages’, in Backus, I., ed., The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West from the Carolingians to the Maurists. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1997, vol. 1, 367–404.Google Scholar

Saarinen, R., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre als Kriterium: Zur Begriffsgeschichte einer ökumenischen Redewendung’, KuD 44 (1998), 88–103.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D., ‘Les débuts de la théologie comme science (II^e–VI^e siècle)’, Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques 80 (1996), 201–20.Google Scholar

Sagüés, J., ‘Un libro pretridentino de Andrés de Vega sobre la justificación’, EE 20 (1946), 175–209.Google Scholar

Saler, M. T., ‘Modernity, Disenchantment, and the Ironic Imagination’, Philosophy and Literature, 28 (2004), 137–49.Google Scholar

Salguiero, T., La doctrine de Saint Augustin sur la grâce d’après le traité à Simplicien. Porto: Faculdade de Letras de Coimbra, 1925.Google Scholar

Salladin, J., ‘Essence and Fullness: Evaluating the Creator–Creature Distinction in Jonathan Edwards’, SJTh 70 (2017), 427–44.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P., Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P., Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People. London: SCM Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Santmire, H. P., ‘Justification in Calvin’s 1540 Romans Commentary’, ChH 33 (1964), 294–313.Google Scholar

Santoro, S., ‘La giustificazione in Giovanni Antonio Delfini, teologo del Concilio di Trento’, MF 40 (1940), 1–27.Google Scholar

Santos-Noya, M., Die Sünden- und Gnadenlehre des Gregor von Rimini. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar

Sawyer, J. F. A., Semantics in Biblical Research: New Methods of Defining Hebrew Words for Salvation. London: SCM Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Schaefer, P. R., ‘Protestant “Scholasticism” at Elizabethan Cambridge: William Perkins and a Reformed Theology of the Heart’, in Trueman, C. R. and Clark, R. S., eds, Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1999, 147–64.Google Scholar

Schäfer, R., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre bei Ritschl und Kähler’, ZThK 62 (1965), 66–85.Google Scholar

Schäfer, R., ‘Melanchthon’s Interpretation of Rom 5.15: His Departure from the Augustinian Concept of Grace Compared to Luther’s’, in Wengert, T. J. and Graham, M. P., eds, Philip Melanchthon (1497‒1560) and the Commentary. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995, 79–104.Google Scholar

Schäfer, R., The Alexandrian Tradition. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar

Schilling, H., Martin Luther: Rebel in an Age of Upheaval. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Scott, J., England’s Troubles: Seventeenth-Century English Political Instability in European Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Scheck, T. P., ‘Justification by Faith Alone in Origen’s Commentary on Romans and Its Reception during the Reformation Era’, in Perrone, L., ed., Origeniana Octava: Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Leuven: Peeters, 2003, 1277–88.Google Scholar

Scheck, T. P., Origen and the History of Justification: The Legacy of Origen’s Commentary on Romans. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Scheck, T. P., ‘Pelagius’s Interpretation of Romans’, in Scheck, T. P., ed., A Companion to St. Paul in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 79–113.Google Scholar

Schelkle, K. H., Paulus Lehrer der Väter: Die altkirchliche Auslegung von Römer 9–11. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1959.Google Scholar

Schierse, F. J., ‘Das Trienterkonzil und die Frage nach der christliche Gewissheit’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Werken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 145–67.Google Scholar

Schiffmann, G. A., Die evangelische Lehre von der Rechtfertigung durch den Glauben. Berlin: Protestantische Vorträge, 1871.Google Scholar

Schlögel, H., Nicht moralisch, sondern theologisch: Zum Gewissensverständnis von Gerhard Ebeling. Mainz: Matthias-Grunewald-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. H., Gerechtigkeit als Weltordnung: Hintergrund und Geschichte des alttestamentlichen Gerechtigkeitsbegriffs. Tübingen: Mohr, 1968.Google Scholar

Schmid, U., Marcion und sein Apostolos: Rekonstruktion und historische Einordnung der marcionitischen Paulusbriefausgabe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar

Schmidt, H. J., Brückenschlag zwischen den Konfessionen. Paderborn: Schoningh, 1951.Google Scholar

Schmoeckel, M., Das Recht der Reformation: Die epistemologische Revolution der Wissenschaft und die Spaltung der Rechtsordnung in der frühen Neuzeit. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar

Scholl, E., ‘Mercy within Mercy: Misericordia and Miseria’, CSQ 42 (2007), 63–82.Google Scholar

Schönberger, D., Gemeinschaft mit Christus: Eine komparative Untersuchung der Heiligungskonzeptionen Johannes Calvins, John Wesleys und Karl Barths. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Theologie, 2014.Google Scholar

Schönberger, R., ‘Rationale Spontaneität: Die Theorie des Willens bei Albertus Magnus’, in Senner, W., ed., Albertus Magnus: Zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 221–34.Google Scholar

Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient: Sein Werden und Wirken. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1951.Google Scholar

Schreiner, T. R., The Law and Its Fulfillment: A Pauline Theology of Law. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998.Google Scholar

Schrenk, G., Gottesreich und Bund im alteren Protestantismus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967.Google Scholar

Schröder, R., Johann Gerhards lutherische Christologie und die aristotelische Metaphysik. Tübingen: Mohr, 1983.Google Scholar

Schröter, M., Aufklärung durch Historisierung: Johann Salomo Semlers Hermeneutik des Christentums. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schubert, C., Mere Passive? Inszenierung Eines Gesprächs über Gnade und Freiheit zwischen Eberhard Jüngel und Thomas Pröpper. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 2014.Google Scholar

Schumacher, L., Rationality as Virtue: Towards a Theological Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Schupp, J., Die Gnadenlehre des Petrus Lombardus. Freiburg: Herder, 1932.Google Scholar

Schuppisser, F. O., ‘Schauen mit den Augen des Herzens: Zur Methodik der spätmittelalterlichen Passionsmeditationen, besonders in der Devotio Moderna und bei den Augustinern’, in Haug, W. and Wachtinger, B., eds, Die Passion Christi in Literatur und Kunst des Spätmittelalters. Tübingen: Mohr, 1993, 169–210.Google Scholar

Schüssler, H., Der Primät der Heiligen Schrift als theologisches und kanonistisches Problem im Spätmittelalter. Wiesbaden: Steiner Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar

Schüssler Fiorenza, E., Jesus: Miriam’s Child, Sophia’s Prophet. New York: Continuum, 1995.Google Scholar

Schütz, F., ‘Anmerkungen zu einer Theologie der Heilsgeschichte’, NZSThR 12 (1970), 103–13.Google Scholar

Schwan, R., Fides, spes und caritas beim jungen Luther, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der mittelälterlichen Tradition. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1962.Google Scholar

Schwarz, R., Vorgeschichte der reformatorischen Bußtheologie, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwarz, R., ‘Luthers Rechtfertigungslehre als Eckstein der christlichen Theologie und Kirche’, ZThK 10 (1998), 14–46.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, A., Die Mystik des Apostels Paulus. Tübingen: Mohr, 1930.Google Scholar

Schwöbel, C., ‘Melanchthons Loci Communes von 1521’, in Schilling, J., ed., Melanchthons bleibende Bedeutung. Kiel: Theologische Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 1998, 57–82.Google Scholar

Scott, J. M., Adoption as Sons of God: An Exegetical Investigation into the Background of Huiothesia in the Pauline Corpus. Tübingen: Mohr, 1992.Google Scholar

Seckler, M., Instinkt und Glaubenswille nach Thomas von Aquin. Mainz: Matthias-Grunewald-Verlag, 1961.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, T. F., ‘The Anglican Exemplary Tradition’, AThR 94 (2012), 207–31.Google Scholar

Segal, A. F., ‘“Two Powers in Heaven” and Early Christian Trinitarian Thinking’, in Davis, S. T., Kendall, D. and O’Collins, G., eds, The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 73–96.Google Scholar

Seifrid, M. A., Justification by Faith: The Origin and Development of a Central Pauline Theme. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Selderhuis, H., ‘Calvinism as Reformed Protestantism: Clarification of a Term’, in Ballor, J. J., Sytsma, D. and Zuidema, J., eds, Church and School in Early Modern Protestantism. Leiden: Brill, 2013, 723–35.Google Scholar

Senft, C., Jésus et Paul: Qui fut l’inventeur du christianisme? Geneva: Labor et Fides, 2002.Google Scholar

Serry, J. H., Historia congregationis de auxiliis. Louvain, 1700.Google Scholar

Seybold, M., Glaube und Rechtfertigung bei Thomas Stapleton. Paderborn: Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1967.Google Scholar

Seybold, M., ‘Zur theologischen Anthropologie bei Michael Baius (1513–89) und Thomas Stapleton (1535–1598)’, in Schmaus, M., Scheffczyk, L., Dettloff, W. and Heinzmann, R., eds, Wahrheit und Verkündigung: Michael Schmaus zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich: Schöningh, 1967, 799–818.Google Scholar

Shagan, E., Popular Politics and the English Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Sheehan, J., ‘Enlightenment, Religion, and the Enigma of Secularization: A Review Essay’, AHR 108 (2003), 1061–80.Google Scholar

Sheridan, T. L., Newman on Justification: A Theological Biography. Staten Island, NY: Alba House, 1967.Google Scholar

Sheridan, T. L., ‘Newman and Luther on Justification’, JES 38 (2001), 217–45.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, K., ‘Le Diable et le droit au Moyen Âge’, RHR 4 (2011), 567–86.Google Scholar

Shuger, D., ‘The Mysteries of the Lambeth Articles’, JEH 68 (2017), 306–25.Google Scholar

Sibylle, R., Zum Herzen sprechen: Eine Studie zum imputativen Aspekt in Martin Luthers Rechtfertigungslehre und zu seinen Konsequenzen für die Predigt des Evangeliums. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2008.Google Scholar

Sicard, P., Hugues de Saint-Victor et son école: introduction, choix de texte, traduction et commentaires. Turnhout: Brepols, 1991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sider, R. J., Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt: The Development of His Thought 1517–1525. Leiden: Brill, 1974.Google Scholar

Siewerth, G., Thomas von Aquin: Die menschlich Willensfreiheit. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1954.Google Scholar

Simuţ, C. C., The Doctrine of Salvation in the Sermons of Richard Hooker. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar

Simuţ, C. C., Richard Hooker and His Early Doctrine of Justification: A Study of His Discourse of Justification. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Sinnema, D. W., ‘Beza’s Doctrine of Predestination in Historical Perspective’, in Backus, I., ed., Théodore de Bèze (1519–1605): Actes du Colloque de Genève. Geneva: Droz, 2007, 219–39.Google Scholar

Sirota, B., ‘The Trinitarian Crisis in Church and State: Religious Controversy and the Making of the Post-Revolutionary Church of England, 1687–1702’, JBS 52 (2013), 26–54.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q., ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, in Visions of Politics I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 57–89.Google Scholar

Smith, H. D., Preaching in the Spanish Golden Age: A Study in Some Preachers of the Reign of Philip III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Smith, L., The Glossa Ordinaria: The Making of a Medieval Bible Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Snoddy, R., The Soteriology of James Ussher: The Act and Object of Saving Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRef Google Scholar

Snyder, H., ‘John Wesley and Macarius the Egyptian’, Asbury Theological Journal 45 (1990), 55–60.Google Scholar

Söding, T., ‘Der Skopos der paulinischen Rechtfertigungslehre: Exegetische Interpretationen in ökumenische Absicht’, ZThK 97 (2000), 404–33.Google Scholar

Söhngen, G., ‘Gesetz und Evangelium’, Catholica 14 (1960), 81–105.Google Scholar

Söhngen, G., ‘Rectitudo bei Anselm von Canterbury als Oberbegrff von Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit’, in Kohlenberger, H., ed., Sola Ratione: Anselm-Studien für F. S. Schmitt. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1970, 71–7.Google Scholar

Sollamo, R. T., ‘The Study of Translation Technique’, in Bons, E. and Joosten, J., eds, Handbuch zur Septuaginta: Die Sprache der Septuagint. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 161–71.Google Scholar

Somme, L.T., Fils adoptifs de Dieu par Jesus Christ: La filiation divine par adoption dans la théologie de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1997.Google Scholar

Song, Y. J. T., Theology and Piety in the Reformed Federal Thought of William Perkins and John Preston. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sorkin, D. J., Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment. London: Peter Halban, 1996.Google Scholar

Sorkin, D., The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Souter, A., The Earliest Latin Commentaries on the Epistles of St Paul. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927.Google Scholar

Spieckerman, H., Gottes Liebe zu Israel: Studien zur Theologie des Alten Testaments. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar

Spottorno, V., ‘The Textual Significance of Spanish Polyglot Bibles’, Sepharad 82 (2002), 375–92.Google Scholar

Spykman, G. J., Attrition and Contrition at the Council of Trent. Kampen: Kok, 1955.Google Scholar

Stacey, C., ‘Justification by Faith in the Two Books of Homilies (1547 and 1571)’, AThR 83 (2001), 255–79.Google Scholar

Stadtland, T., Rechtfertigung und Heiligung bei Calvin. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Staedtke, J., Die Theologie des jungen Bullinger. Zurich: Zwingli-Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar

Stakemeier, A., Das Konzil von Trient über die Heilsgewissheit. Heidelberg: Kerle, 1949.Google Scholar

Stakemeier, E., ‘Die theologischen Schulen auf dem Trienter Konzil während der Rechtfertigungsverhandlung’, ThQ 117 (1936), 188–207, 322–50, 446–504.Google Scholar

Stakemeier, E., Der Kampf um Augustin: Augustinus und die Augustiner auf dem Tridentinum. Paderborn: Bonicacius-Druckerei, 1937.Google Scholar

Stanton, G. N., ‘Presuppositions in New Testament Criticism’, in Marshall, I. H., ed., New Testament Interpretation: Essays in Principles and Method. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977, 60–71.Google Scholar

Stanton, R., The Culture of Translation in Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2002.Google Scholar

Starn, R., ‘The Early Modern Muddle’, JEMH 6 (2002), 296–30.Google Scholar

Stauffer, R., ‘Einfluß und Kritik des Humanismus in Zwinglis “Commentarius de vera et falsa religione”’, Zwingliana 16 (1983), 97–110.Google Scholar

Stayer, J. M., Martin Luther, German Saviour: German Evangelical Theological Factions and the Interpretation of Luther, 1917–1933. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stegman, T. D., ‘Paul’s Use of Dikaio-Terminology: Moving beyond N. T. Wright’s Forensic Interpretation’, ThSt 72 (2011), 496–524.Google Scholar

Stegmüller, F., ‘Gratia sanans: Zur Schicksal des Augustinismus in der Salmantizienerschule’, in Grabmann, M. and Mausbach, J., eds, Aurelius Augustinus: Festschrift der Görres-Gesellschaft zum 1500. Tod des heiligen Augustinus. Cologne: Bachem, 1930, 395–409.Google Scholar

Stegmüller, F., Francisco de Vitoria y la doctrina de gracia en la escuela salmantina. Barcelona: Librería Cervantes, 1934.Google Scholar

Stegmüller, F., ‘Zur Gnadenlehre des spanischen Konzilstheologen Domingo de Soto’, in Schreiber, G., ed., Das Weltkonzil von Trient. Freiburg: Herder, 1951, 169–230.Google Scholar

Steinhauser, K. B., ‘Job Exegesis: The Pelagian Controversy’, in van Fleteren, F. and Schnaubelt, J. C., eds, Augustine: Biblical Exegete. New York: Peter Lang, 2001, 299–312.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, D. C., Misericordia Dei: The Theology of Johannes von Staupitz in Its Late Medieval Setting. Leiden: Brill, 1968.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, D. C., ‘Calvin and Abraham: The Interpretation of Romans 4 in the Sixteenth Century’, ChH 57 (1998), 443–55.Google Scholar

Stendahl, K., ‘The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West’, HThR 56 (1963), 199–215.Google Scholar

Stendahl, K., Paul among Jews and Gentiles, and Other Essays. London: SCM Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Stephens, W. P., The Holy Spirit in the Theology of Martin Bucer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Stievermann, J., ‘Faithful Translations: New Discoveries on the German Pietist Reception of Jonathan Edwards’, ChH 83 (2014), 324–66.Google Scholar

Still, T. D., and Wilhite, D. E., eds, Tertullian and Paul. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2013.Google Scholar

Still, T. D., and Wilhite, D. E., The Apostolic Fathers and Paul. London: T&T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Stock, K., Die Theorie der christlichen Gewissheit. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.Google Scholar

Stoeckle, B., ‘Gratia supponit naturam’: Geschichte und Analyse eines theologischen Axioms. Rome: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1962.Google Scholar

Stoever, W. K. B., ‘Nature, Grace and John Cotton: The Theological Dimension in the New England Antinomian Controversy’, ChH 44 (1975), 22–33.Google Scholar

Stolle, V., Luther und Paulus: Die exegetischen und hermeneutischen Grundlagen der lutherischen Rechtfertigungslehre im Paulinismus Luthers. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2002.Google Scholar

Stolt, B., ‘“… und fühl’s im Herzen …”: Luthers Bibelübersetzung aus der Sicht neuerer Sprach-und Übersetzungswissenschaft’, ZThK 98 (2001), 186–208.Google Scholar

Stratenwerth, G., Die Naturrechtslehre des Johannes Duns Scotus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1951.Google Scholar

Sträter, U., and Appold, K. G., eds, Zur Rechtfertigungslehre in der lutherischen Orthodoxie. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2003.Google Scholar

Strawbridge, J. R., The Pauline Effect: The Use of the Pauline Epistles by Early Christian Writers. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar

Strehle, S., ‘Imputatio Iustitiae: Its Origin in Melanchthon, Its Opposition in Osiander’, ThZ 50 (1994), 201–19.Google Scholar

Strobel, K., ‘By Word and Spirit: Jonathan Edwards on Redemption, Justification, and Regeneration’, in Moody, J., ed., Jonathan Edwards and Justification. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2012, 45–69.Google Scholar

Strohl, H., La pensée de la Réforme. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestle, 1951.Google Scholar

Strohm, C., ‘Frontstellungen, Entwicklungen, Eigenart der Rechtfertigungslehre bei Bullinger’, in Campi, E. and Opitz, P., eds, Heinrich Bullinger. 2 vols. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 2007, vol. 1, 537–71.Google Scholar

Strom, J., ‘Problems and Promises of Pietism Research’, ChH 71 (2002), 536–54.Google Scholar

Stüben, J., ‘Erasmus von Rotterdam und der Ambrosiaster: Zur Identifikationsgeschichte einer wichtigen Quelle Augustins’, WuW 60 (1997), 3–22.Google Scholar

Studer, B., ‘Jesucristo, nuestra justicia, según san Augustin’, Augustinus 26 (1981), 253–82.Google Scholar

Stufler, J., ‘Die entfernte Vorbereitung auf die Rechtfertigung nach dem hl. Thomas’, ZKTh 47 (1923), 1–23, 161–83.Google Scholar

Stufler, J., ‘Der hl. Thomas und das Axiom omne quod movetur ab alio movetur’, ZKTh 47 (1923), 369–90.Google Scholar

Stuhlmacher, P., Gerechtigkeit Gottes bei Paulus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966.Google Scholar

Stupperich, R., Der Humanismus und die Wiedervereinigung der Konfession. Leipzig: Hensius, 1936.Google Scholar

Stupperich, R., ‘Der Ursprung des Regensburger Buches von 1541 und seine Rechtfertigungslehre’, ARG 36 (1939), 88–116.Google Scholar

Stupperich, R., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre bei Luther und Melanchthon 1530–1536’, in Luther und Melanchthon. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961, 73–88.Google Scholar

Sturges, R. S., ed., Law and Sovereignty in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar

Stylianopoulos, T., ‘Comments on Chrysostom, Patristic Interpretation, and Contemporary Biblical Scholarship’, GOTR 5 (2009), 189‒204.Google Scholar

Subilia, V., La giustificazione per fede. Brescia: Paideia Editrice, 1976.Google Scholar

Swain, S. R., ‘The Covenant of Redemption’, in Allen, M. and Swain, S. R., eds, Christian Dogmatics: Reformed Theology for the Church Catholic. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2016, 107–25.Google Scholar

Sytsma, D. S., Richard Baxter and the Mechanical Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Tamburello, D. E., Union with Christ: John Calvin and the Mysticism of St. Bernard. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Tanner, K., Christ the Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tellechea, I., ‘El articulus de iustificatione de Fray Bartolomeo de Carranza’, RET 15 (1955), 563–635.Google Scholar

TeSelle, E., ‘Rufinius the Syrian, Caelestius, Pelagius: Explorations in the Prehistory of the Pelagian Controversy’, AugSt 3 (1972), 61–95.Google Scholar

Thielicke, H., ‘Ius divinum und ius humanum’, in Kretschmar, G. and Lohse, B., eds, Ecclesia und Res Publica. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1961, 162–75.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. J., Paul’s ‘Works of the Law’ in the Perspective of Second Century Reception. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar

Thomassen, E., ‘Orthodoxy and Heresy in Second-Century Rome’, HThR 97 (2004), 241–56.Google Scholar

Thurneysen, E., ‘Rechtfertigung und Seelsorge’, ZZ 6 (1928), 197–218.Google Scholar

Thurneysen, E., Die Lehre von der Seelsorge. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1948.Google Scholar

Tilling, C., ‘Campbell’s Apocalyptic Gospel and Pauline Athanasianism, in Tilling, C., ed., Beyond Old and New Perspectives on Paul. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014, 49–73.Google Scholar

Toner, N., ‘The Doctrine of Justification according to Augustine of Rome (Favaroni)’, Augustiniana 8 (1958), 164–89, 229–327, 497–515.Google Scholar

Torchia, N. J., ‘The Significance of Ordo in St. Augustine’s Moral Theory’, in Lienhard, J. T., Muller, E. C. and Teske, R. J., eds, Augustine: Presbyter Factus Sum. New York: Peter Lang, 1993, 263–78.Google Scholar

Torrance, J. B., ‘Covenant or Contract? A Study of the Theological Background of Worship in Seventeenth-Century Scotland’, SJTh 23 (1970), 51–76.Google Scholar

Torrance, T. F., ‘Justification: Its Radical Nature and Place in Reformed Doctrine and Life’, SJTh 13 (1960), 225–46.Google Scholar

Torrance, T. F., ‘Karl Barth and the Latin Heresy’, SJTh 39 (1986), 461–82.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S., Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Trapè, A., Il concorso divino nel pensiero di Egidio Romano. Tolentino: Tipografia S. Nicola, 1942.Google Scholar

Trapè, A., Sant’ Agostino: Introduzione alla dottrina della grazia. 2 vols. Rome: Citta Nuova, 1990.Google Scholar

Trapp, D., ‘Augustinian Theology of the Fourteenth Century’, Augustiniana 6 (1956), 146–274.Google Scholar

Trevor-Roper, H., ‘The Religious Origins of the Enlightenment’, in The European Witch Craze of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. New York: Harper, 1968, 193–236.Google Scholar

Trueman, C. R., Luther’s Legacy: Salvation and English Reformers 1525–1556. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Trueman, C. R., ‘A Small Step Towards Rationalism: The Impact of the Metaphysics of Tommaso Campanella on the Theology of Richard Baxter’, in Trueman, C. R. and Clark, R. S., eds, Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment. Carlisle: Paternoster Press, 1999, 181–95.Google Scholar

Trueman, C. R., ‘Is the Finnish Line a New Beginning? A Critical Assessment of the Reading of the Reading of Luther Offered by the Finnish Circle’, WTJ 65 (2003), 231–44.Google Scholar

Tucker, J., The Construction of Reformed Identity in Jean Crespin’s ‘Livre des Martyrs’. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Tuor-Kurth, C., ‘Frömmigkeit und Gerechtigkeit: grundlegende Werte in antiken Identitätsdiskursen’, KuI 25 (2010), 99‒111.Google Scholar

Tuor-Kurth, C., ‘Abraham: Vater aller Glaubenden? Neuere Zugänge zur Frage der Abstammung der Christusgläubigen bei Paulus’, KuI 31 (2016), 33–49.Google Scholar

Tuor-Kurth, C., ‘How Is Justice Referred to Faith? Some Reflections on the Hellenistic Jewish Tradition of the Reciprocal Relationship between Obedience to Torah and Righteousness and Their Reception in the New Testament with Special Focus on the Letter to the Romans’, in Gillmayr-Bucher, S. and Häusl, M., eds, Sedaqa and Torah in Postexilic Discourse. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017, 132–47.Google Scholar

Turner, F. M., John Henry Newman: The Challenge to Evangelical Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Turner, H. E. W., The Patristic Doctrine of Redemption: A Study of the Development of Doctrine during the First Five Centuries. London: A. R. Mowbray & Co., 1952.Google Scholar

Tyacke, N., Anti-Calvinists: The Rise of English Arminianism c. 1590–1640. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Tyacke, N., Aspects of English Protestantism, c. 1530–1700. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Usher, B., William Cecil and Episcopacy, 1559–77. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar

Vainio, O.-P., Justification and Participation in Christ: The Development of the Lutheran Doctrine of Justification from Luther to the Formula of Concord (1580). Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, W. J., ‘The Doctrine of Abrogations in the Federal Theology of Johannes Cocceius’, CThJ 29 (1994), 101–16.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, W. J., The Federal Theology of Johannes Cocceius (1603–1669). Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, W. J., ‘Scholasticism Revisited: Methodological Reflections on the Study of Seventeenth-Century Reformed Thought’, in Chapman, A., Coffey, J. and Gregory, B. S., eds, Seeing Things Their Way: Intellectual History and the Return of Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009, 154–74.Google Scholar

Van de Schoor, R. J. M., The Irenical Theology of Théophile Brachet de la Milletière (1588–1665). Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar

Van den Berg, J., ‘English Deism and Germany: The Thomas Morgan Controversy’, JEH 59 (2008), 48–61.Google Scholar

Van den Eynde, D., ‘Les définitions des sacrements pendant la première période de la théologie scolastique (1050–1235)’, Antonianum 24 (1949), 183–228, 439–88; 25 (1950), 3–7.Google Scholar

Van der Kooij, A., ‘Zur Theologie des Jesajabuches in der Septuaginta’, in Reventloh, H., ed., Theologische Probleme der Septuaginta und der Hellenistischen Hermeneutik. Gütersloh: Kaiser Verlag, 1997, 9–25.Google Scholar

Van der Merwe, C. H. J., ‘Lexical Meaning in Biblical Hebrew and Cognitive Semantics: A Case Study’, Biblica 87 (2006), 85–95.Google Scholar

Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Van Deusen, N., ed., The Place of the Psalms in the Intellectual Culture of the Middle Ages. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, C., ‘Giving Each His Due: Langland, Gower, and the Question of Equity’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 108 (2009), 310–35.Google Scholar

Van Egmont, P. J., ‘The Confession of Faith Ascribed to Caelestius’, Sacris Eradiri 50 (2011), 317–39.Google Scholar

Van Geest, P., ‘Multi-Layered Indebtedness: St. Augustine as Fons and Auctoritas for Gabriel Biel’, AugSt 43 (2012), 219–38.Google Scholar

VanLandingham, C., Judgment & Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar

Van Nieuwenhove, R., ‘St Anselm and St Thomas Aquinas on “Satisfaction”’, Angelicum 80 (2003), 159–76.Google Scholar

Van Oort, J., ‘John Calvin and the Church Fathers’, in Backus, I., ed., The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West: From the Carolingians to the Maurists. Leiden: Brill, 1997, 661–700.Google Scholar

Van Ravenswaay, J. M. J. L., Augustinus totus noster: Das Augustinverständnis bei Johannes Calvin. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990.Google Scholar

Van Rensburg, F. J. J., ‘Metaphors in the Soteriology in 1 Peter: Identifying and Interpreting the Salvific Imageries’, in Van der Watt, J. G., ed., Salvation in the New Testament: Perspectives on Soteriology. Leiden: Brill, 2005, 409–35.Google Scholar

Vanneste, A., ‘Nature et grâce dans la théologie du XII^e siècle’, EThL 50 (1974), 181–214.Google Scholar

Vanneste, A., ‘Nature et grâce dans la théologie de Saint Augustin’, RechAug 10 (1975), 143–69.Google Scholar

Van’t Spijker, W., ‘Prädestination bei Bucer und Calvin’, in Neusner, W., ed., Calvinus Theologus. Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1976, 85–111.Google Scholar

Veldhuis, H., ‘Ordained and Absolute Power in Scotus’ Ordinatio I 44’, Vivarium 38 (2000), 222–30.Google Scholar

Vignaux, P., Justification et prédestination au XIV^e siècle. Paris: Vrin, 1934.Google Scholar

Vignaux, P., Luther, Commentateur des Sentences (livre i, distinction xvii). Paris: Vrin, 1935.Google Scholar

Vignaux, P., ‘Sur Luther et Ockham’, FS 32 (1950), 21–30.Google Scholar

Villa-Vicencio, C., ‘Protestantism, Modernity and Justification by Faith’, SJTh 38 (1985), 369–82.Google Scholar

Visser, A. S. Q., Reading Augustine in the Reformation: The Flexibility of Intellectual Authority in Europe, 1500–1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Voak, N., Richard Hooker and Reformed Theology: A Study of Reason, Will, and Grace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Vogelsang, E., Die Anfänge von Luthers Christologie nach der ersten Psalmenvorlesung. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1929.Google Scholar

Vogelsang, E., Der angefochtene Christus bei Luther. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1932.Google Scholar

Voigt, C., Der englische Deismus in Deutschland: Eine Studie zur Rezeption Englisch–Deistischer Literatur in deutschen Zeitschriften und Kompendien des 18. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Volkmar, C., ‘Turning Luther’s Weapons against Him: The Birth of Catholic Propaganda in Saxony in the 1520s’, in Walsby, M. and Kemp, G., eds, The Book Triumphant: Print in Transition in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 2011, 115–31.Google Scholar

Vollenweider, S., ‘Paulus in Zürich: Zur Briefauslegung von Heinrich Bullinger’, ZThK 114 (2017), 1–20.Google Scholar

Volz, H., ‘Luthers Randbemerkungen zu zwei Schriften Gabriel Biels: Kritische Anmerkungen zu Hermann Degerings Publikation’, ZKG 81 (1970), 207–19.Google Scholar

Von Harnack, A., Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte. 3 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau: Mohr, 1886–90.Google Scholar

Von Harnack, A., Marcion: Das Evangelium vom fremden Gott: Eine Monographie zur Geschichte der Grundlegung der katholischen Kirche. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1921.Google Scholar

Von Loewenich, W., Von Augustin zu Luther. Witten: Luther-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar

Von Loewenich, W., Duplex Iustitia: Luthers Stellung zu einer Unionsformel des 16. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

Von Sass, H., ‘Assensus Fiduciae: Glauben als vertrauen bei Rudolf Bultmann’, KuD 57, no. 3 (2011), 243–68.Google Scholar

Von Scheliha, A., Der Glaube an die göttliche Vorsehung: Eine religionssoziologische, geschichtsphilosophische und theologiegeschichtliche Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1998.Google Scholar

Wallace, D. D., ‘Socinianism, Justification by Faith, and the Sources of John Locke’s The Reasonableness of Christianity’, JHI 45 (1984), 49–66.Google Scholar

Wallmann, J., ‘Der Streit um die “Gemeinsame Erklärung zur Rechtfertigungslehre”’, ZThK 10 (1998), 207–51.Google Scholar

Wallmann, J., Pietismus-Studien: Gesammelte Aufsätze. 2 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Google Scholar

Walz, A., ‘La giustificazione tridentina’, Angelicum 28 (1951), 97–138.Google Scholar

Ward, T. M., ‘Voluntarism, Atonement, and Duns Scotus’, HeyJ 58 (2017), 37–43.Google Scholar

Ward, W. R., The Protestant Evangelical Awakening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Washburn, C. D., ‘The Transformative Power of Grace and Condign Merit at the Council of Trent’, The Thomist 79 (2015), 173–212.Google Scholar

Watson, F., Paul, Judaism and the Gentiles: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Watson, N. M., ‘Some Observations Concerning the Use of Dikaioo in the Septuagint’, JBL 79 (1960), 255–66.Google Scholar

Watson, N. M., ‘Justified by Faith, Judged by Works: An Antimony?’, NTS 29 (1983), 209–21.Google Scholar

Wawrykow, J. P., God’s Grace and Human Action: ‘Merit’ in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wawrykow, J. P., ‘Grace and Justification’, in Ayres, L. and Volpe, M. A., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 403–22.Google Scholar

Weaver, R. H., Divine Grace and Human Agency: A Study of the Semi-Pelagian Controversy. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Weber, H. P., ‘The Glossa in IV Libros Sententiarum by Alexander of Hales’, in Rosemann, P. W., ed., Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001–15, vol. 2, 79–109.Google Scholar

Weigelt, H., Geschichte des Pietismus in Bayern: Anfänge, Entwicklung, Bedeutung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar

Weijenborg, R., ‘La charité dans la première théologie de Luther’, RHE 45 (1950), 615–69Google Scholar

Weingart, R. E., The Logic of Divine Love: A Critical Analysis of the Soteriology of Peter Abailard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Weir, D. A., The Origins of the Federal Theology in Sixteenth-Century Reformation Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Weir, D. A., Early New England: A Covenanted Society. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Weisweiler, H., ‘L’école de Laôn et de Guillaume de Champeaux’, RThAM 4 (1932), 237–69, 371–91.Google Scholar

Wendebourg, D., ‘Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der “Gemeinsamen Erklärung”’, ZThK 10 (1998), 140–206.Google Scholar

Wengert, T. J., Law and Gospel: Philip Melanchthon’s Debate with John Agricola of Eisleben over Poenitentia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Wengert, T. J., ‘Melanchthon and Luther / Luther and Melanchthon’, LuJ 66 (1999), 55–88.Google Scholar

Wengert, T. J., ‘Philipp Melanchthon and Augustine of Hippo’, LuQ 22 (2008), 249–67.Google Scholar

Wengert, T. J., Defending Faith: Lutheran Responses to Andreas Osiander’s Doctrine of Justification, 1551–1559. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar

Wenz, G., Theologie der Bekenntnisschriften der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirche: Eine historische und systematische Einführung in das Konkordienbuch. 2 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998.Google Scholar

Wenz, G., Versöhnung: Soteriologische Fallstudien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015.Google Scholar

Werbeck, W., Jacobus Perez von Valencia: Untersuchungen zu seiner Psalmenkommentar. Tübingen: Mohr, 1959.Google Scholar

Werbick, J., ‘Rechtfertigung des Sünders – Rechtfertigung Gottes: Thesen zur ökumenischen Diskussion um die Rechtfertigungslehre’, KuD 27 (1981), 45–57.Google Scholar

Wermelinger, O., Rom und Pelagius: Die theologische Position der römischen Bischöfe im pelagianischen Streit in den Jahren 411–432. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1975.Google Scholar

Werner, M., Der protestantische Weg des Glaubens. Bern: Haupt, 1962.Google Scholar

Werrell, R. S., The Blood of Christ in the Theology of William Tyndale. Cambridge: James Clarke, 2015.Google Scholar

Westcott, B. F., St Paul and Justification. London: Macmillan, 1913.Google Scholar

Westerholm, S., Israel’s Law and the Church’s Faith: Paul and His Recent Interpreters. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1988.Google Scholar

Westerholm, S., Perspectives Old and New on Paul: The ‘Lutheran’ Paul and His Critics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Whidden, W. W., ‘Wesley on Imputation: A Truly Reckoned Reality or Antinomian Polemical Wreckage?’, Asbury Theological Journal 52 (1997), 63–70.Google Scholar

White, B. L., Remembering Paul: Ancient and Modern Contests over the Image of the Apostle. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

White, R., ‘An Early Doctrinal Handbook: Farel’s Summaire et Briefve Declaration’, WTJ 69 (2007), 21–38.Google Scholar

Whitehill, W. M., Spanish Romanesque Architecture of the Eleventh Century. London: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Whitley, C. F., ‘Deutero-Isaiah’s Interpretation of Sedeq’, VT 22 (1972), 469–75.Google Scholar

Wicki, N., Die Philosophie Philipps des Kanzlers: Ein philosophierender Theologe des frühen 13. Jahrhunderts. Fribourg: Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wicks, J., ‘Justification in a Broader Horizon’, Pro Ecclesia 12 (2003), 473–91.Google Scholar

Widman, P., ‘Albrecht Ritschls Rückgriff auf die Reformation’, in Helmer, C. and Holm, B. K., eds, Lutherrenaissance: Past and Present. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2015, 74–86.Google Scholar

Wigelsworth, J. R., Deism in Enlightenment England: Theology, Politics, and Newtonian Public Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wilcox, M., ‘Constructing Metaphoric Models of Salvation: Matthew 20 and the Middle English Poem Pearl’, Studies in the Bible and Antiquity 3 (2011), 1–22.Google Scholar

Wildeboer, G., ‘Die älteste Bedeutung des Stammes sdq’, ZAW 22 (1902), 167–9.Google Scholar

Wiley, D. N., ‘The Dispute of Lausanne and the Theology of William Farel: The Doctrine of Justification and Its Sources’, in Junod, E., ed., La Dispute de Lausanne (1536): La théologie réformée après Zwingli et avant Calvin. Lausanne: Presses Centrales Lausanne, 1988, 142–8.Google Scholar

Wiley, T., Original Sin: Origins, Developments, Contemporary Meaning. New York: Paulist Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. D., ‘Grace and Growth: Aquinas, Lonergan, and the Problematic of Habitual Grace’, ThSt 72 (2011), 723–49.Google Scholar

Williams, D. H., ‘Justification by Faith: A Patristic Doctrine’, JEH 57 (2006), 649–67.Google Scholar

Williams, M., The Doctrine of Salvation in the First Letter of Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D., Arius: Heresy and Tradition. 2nd edn. London: SCM Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Williams, T., ‘Reason, Morality, and Voluntarism in Duns Scotus: A Pseudo–Problem Dissolved’, The Modern Schoolman 74 (1997), 73–94.Google Scholar

Willis-Watkins, D., ‘The Unio Mystica and the Assurance of Faith according to Calvin’, in van’t Spijker, W., ed., Calvin: Erbe und Auftrag. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1991, 77–84.Google Scholar

Wilson-Kastner, P., ‘Andreas Osiander’s Theology of Grace in the Perspective of the Influence of Augustine of Hippo’, SCJ 10 (1979), 72–91.Google Scholar

Winiarski, D. L., ‘Jonathan Edwards, Enthusiast? Radical Revivalism and the Great Awakening in the Connecticut Valley’, ChH 74 (2005), 683–739.Google Scholar

Winship, M. P., ‘Defining Puritanism in Restoration England: Richard Baxter and Others Respond to A Friendly Debate’, HJ 54 (2011), 689–715.Google Scholar

Wippel, J. F., ‘Thomas Aquinas on the Ultimate “Why” Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever?’, Review of Metaphysics 60 (2007), 731–53.Google Scholar

Wischmeyer, W. K., ‘Bemerkungen zu den Paulusbriefkommentaren des G. Marius Victorinus’, ZNW 63 (1972), 108–20.Google Scholar

Witt, W. G., ‘Anglican Reflections on Justification by Faith’, AThR 95 (2013), 57–80.Google Scholar

Wittreck, F., ‘Money in Medieval Philosophy’, in Fox, D. and Ernst, W., Money in the Western Legal Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 53–70.Google Scholar

Wolf, E., ‘Die Rechtfertigungslehre als Mitte und Grenze reformatorischer Theologie’, in Peregrinatio II: Studien zur reformatorischen Theologie, zum Kirchenrecht und zur Sozialethik. Munich: Kaiser Verlag, 1965, 11–21.Google Scholar

Wolfe, J., Heidegger and Theology. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar

Wood, A. W., Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Wood, R., ‘Göttliches Gebot und Gutheit Gottes nach Wilhelm von Ockham’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 101 (1994), 38–54.Google Scholar

Wood, R., ‘Ockham’s Repudiation of Pelagianism’, in Spade, P. V., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 350–73.Google Scholar

Wörter, F., Die christliche Lehre über das Verhältnis von Gnade und Freiheit von den apostolischen Zeiten bis zu Augustinus. 2 vols. Freiburg: Herder, 1855–60.Google Scholar

Wrede, W., Paulus. 2nd edn. Tübingen: Mohr, 1907.Google Scholar

Wriedt, M., Gnade und Erwählung: Eine Untersuchung zu Johann von Staupitz und Martin Luther. Mainz: von Zabern, 1991.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., Paul: Fresh Perspectives. London: SPCK, 2005.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., ‘New Perspectives on Paul’, in McCormack, B. L., ed., Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006, 243–64.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., Justification: God’s Plan and Paul’s Vision. London: SPCK, 2009.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., Paul and the Faithfulness of God. London: SPCK, 2013.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., Pauline Perspectives: Essays on Paul 1978–2013. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., ‘Right Standing, Right Understanding and Wright Misunderstanding: A Response’, JSPL 4 (2014), 89–106.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T., Paul and His Recent Interpreters. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Wu, T., ‘Augustine on initium fidei: A Case Study of the Coexistence of Operative Grace and Free Decision of the Will’, RThAM 79 (2012), 1–38.Google Scholar

Xiberta, B., ‘La causa meritoria de la justificación en las controversias pretridentinas’, RET 5 (1945), 87–106.Google Scholar

Yang, A. S., ‘Scotus’ Voluntarist Approach to the Atonement Reconsidered’, SJTh 62, no. 4 (2009), 421–40.Google Scholar

Yarnell, M. B., The Formation of Christian Doctrine. Nashville, TN: B&H Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

Yarnold, E. J., ‘Duplex iustitia: The Sixteenth Century and the Twentieth’, in Evans, G. R., ed., Christian Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, 204–23.Google Scholar

Yeago, D. S., ‘Literature in the Drama of Nature and Grace: Hans Urs von Balthasar’s Paradigm for a Theology of Culture’, in Block, E., ed., Glory, Grace, and Culture. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2005, 88–106.Google Scholar

Yeide, H., Studies in Classical Pietism: The Flowering of the Ecclesiola. New York: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar

Yinger, K. L., Paul, Judaism and Judgment according to Deeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Young, B. W., Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England: Theological Debate from Locke to Burke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Young, F., Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Zachhuber, J., ‘Friedrich Schleiermacher und Albrecht Ritschl: Kontinuitäten und Diskontinuitäten in der Theologie des 19. Jahrhunderts’, JHMTh 12 (2005), 16–46.Google Scholar

Zachhuber, J., ‘Weltbild, Weltanschauung, Religion: Ein Paradigma intellektueller Diskurse im 19. Jahrhundert’, in Zachuber, J. and Markschies, C., eds, Die Welt als Bild. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008, 171–94.Google Scholar

Zachhuber, J., ‘Albrecht Ritschl and the Tübingen School: A Neglected Link in the History of 19th Century Theology’, JHMTh 18 (2011), 51–70.Google Scholar

Zachhuber, J., Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F. C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Zahl, P. F. M., Die Rechtfertigungslehre Ernst Käsemanns. Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar

Zahl, S., ‘On the Affective Salience of Doctrines’, MoTh 31 (2015), 428–44.Google Scholar

Zahl, S., ‘The Bondage of the Affections: Willing, Feeling, and Desiring in Luther’s Theology, 1513‒25’, in Coulter, D. M. and Yong, A., eds, The Spirit, the Affections, and the Christian Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2017, 181–205.Google Scholar

Zahl, S., ‘Revisiting “the Nature of Protestantism”: Justification by Faith Five Hundred Years On’, New Blackfriars 99 (2017), 129–46.Google Scholar

Zanella, F., The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ in Ancient Hebrew. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Ziegler, E., ‘Zur Reformation als Reformation des Lebens und der Sitten’, Rorschacher Neujahrsblatt (1984), 53–71.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, G., ‘Calvins Auseinandersetzung mit Osianders Rechtfertigungslehre’, KuD 35 (1989), 236–56.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, G., ‘Rechtfertigungslehre und Säkularisation’, ZRGG 42 (1990), 299–315.Google Scholar

Zuidema, J., and van Raalte, T., Early French Reform: The Theology and Spirituality of Guillaume Farel. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., Dionysius de Montina: Ein neuentdeckter Augustinentheologe des Spätmittelalters. Würzburg: Augustinus Verlag, 1948.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Hugolin von Orvieto über Urstand und Erbsünde’, Augustiniana 3 (1953), 35–62, 165–93; 4 (1954), 25–46.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Hugolin von Orvieto über Prädestination, Rechtfertigung und Verdienst’, Augustiniana 4 (1954), 109–56; 5 (1955), 5–51.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Der Wiener Theologieprofessor Johannes von Retz und seine Lehre von Urstand, Erbsünde, Gnade und Verdienst’, Augustiniana 22 (1972), 118–84, 540–82.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Johannes Klenkok O.S.A. im Kampf gegen den “Pelagianismus” seiner Zeit: Seine Lehre über Gnade, Rechtfertigung und Verdienst’, RechAug 13 (1978), 231–333.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Die Lehre des Erfurter Augustinertheologen Johannes von Dorsten über Gnade, Rechtfertigung und Verdienst’, ThPh 53 (1978), 7–64, 127–219.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Der Augustinertheologe Johannes Hiltalingen von Basel über Erbsünde, Gnade und Verdienst’, AnAug 43 (1980), 57–162.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Der Augustiner Angelus Dobelinus, erster Theologieprofessor der Erfurter Universität, über Gnade, Rechtfertigung und Verdienst’, AnAug 44 (1981), 69–147.Google Scholar

Zumkeller, A., ‘Erbsünde, Gnade und Rechtfertigung im Verständnis der Erfurter Augustinertheologen des Spätmittelalters’, ZKG 92 (1981), 39–59.Google Scholar

Zur Mühlen, K.-H., ‘Die Einigung über den Rechtfertigungsartikel auf dem Regensburger Religionsgespräch von 1541 ‒ Eine verpaßte Chance?’, ZThK 76 (1979), 331–59.Google Scholar

Zur Mühlen, K.-H., ‘Die auctoritas patrum in Martin Luthers Schrift “Von den Konziliis und Kirchen” (1539)’, in Grane, L., Schindler, A. and Wriedt, M., eds, Auctoritas patrum II: Neue Beiträge zur Rezeption der Kirchenväter im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 1998, 141–52.Google Scholar

Book contents

Works Consulted

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Book contents

Works Consulted

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive