Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:37:24.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2018

Evangelos Raftopoulos
Evangelos Raftopoulos
Affiliation:
Panteion University of Athens
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Negotiation
A Process of Relational Governance for International Common Interest
 , pp. 250 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allot, P. Eunomia: New Order for a New World. Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. “The New Treaty Makers.” 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law (2002), 213–234.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. “The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society.” 11 EJIL (2000), 91–120.Google Scholar
Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underal, A., and Wettestad, J. Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement. Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Antonakis, J. and House, R. J. “The Full-Range Leadership Theory: The Way Forward.” In Avolio, B. and Yammarino, F. (eds.), Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead. JAI, 2002, 3–34.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Metaphysics, vol. XVII (transl. by Tredennick, H.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics, vol. XIX (transl. by H. Rackham). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1926 (reprinted 1999).Google Scholar
Aristotle Physics, vol. IV (transl. by P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Aristotle Politics, vol. XXI (transl. by Rackham, H.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1932 (reprinted 1998).Google Scholar
Aristotle Posterior Analytics, vol. II (transl. by Tredennick, H. and Forster, E. S.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Aust, A. Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Barriga, S. “Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression.” In Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to Its Review. Ashgate Publishing, 2010, 621–643.Google Scholar
Barriga, S. “Introduction to the Negotiation History.” In Barriga, Stefan and Kress, Claus (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression. Cambridge University Press, 2011, 1–98.Google Scholar
Benedick, R. E. “Perspectives of a Negotiation Practitioner.” In Sjosted, G. (ed.), International Environmental Negotiations. SAGE Publications, 1993, 219–243.Google Scholar
Blokker, N. and Kress, C. “A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala.” 23(4) LJIL (2010), 889–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown Weiss, E. “Strengthening National Compliance with International Environmental Agreements.” 27(4) Environmental Policy and Law (1997), 297–303.Google Scholar
Cardiner, R. Treaty Interpretation. The Oxford International Law Library. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jager, J., and Mitchell, R. B. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” 100(14) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2003), 8086–8091.Google Scholar
Charney, J. I. “Technology and International Negotiations.” 76 AJIL (1982), 78–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chossudovsky, E. M. The Helsinki Final Act Viewed in the United Nations Perspective: Towards Strengthening the Continuity and Coherence of the Follow-Up to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, UNITAR 1980, Research Report No. 24.Google Scholar
Churchill, R. R. and Ufstein, G. “Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law.” 94 AJIL (2000), 623–659.Google Scholar
Collingwood, V. “Non-Governmental Organisations, Power and Legitimacy in International Society.” 32 Review of International Studies (2006), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on Global Governance. Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing.” 10(4) Organization Science(1999), 381–400. Edited version (2005). Available at: www.sagepub.com/upm-data/9926_039585Ch03.pdf.Google Scholar
Cooney, R. and Lang, A. “Taking Uncertainty Seriously: Adaptive Governance, Alien Invasive Species and the WTO.” 18 EJIL (2007), 523–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A. et al. “Your Morals Depend on Language.” Plos One, 23 April 2014. Available at: www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0094842.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. “Responsibility for Breaches of Communitarian Norms: An Appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” In Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E., Paulus, A., von Schorlemer, S., and Vedder, C. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma. Oxford University Press, 2011, 224. Doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0017Google Scholar
Cross, J. “Negotiation as Adaptive Learning.” 1 International Negotiation (1996), 153–178.Google Scholar
David, A. E. The Strategy of Treaty Termination: Lawful Breaches and Retaliations. Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
De Bono, E. Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
De Bono, E. Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. HarperBusiness, 1992.Google Scholar
De Burca, G. “The European Union in the Negotiation of the UN Disability Convention.” 35(2) European Law Review (2010), 174–196.Google Scholar
Dobelli, R. The Art of Thinking Clearly (transl. by Griffin, N.). Harper, 2013.Google Scholar
Dowdle, M. W. (ed.). Public Accountability: Design, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Drury, J. L. et al. “Sympathetic Decisions: Incorporating Impacts on Others into Emergency Response Decision Spaces.” In Comes, T., Fiedrich, F., Fortier, S., Geldermann, J., and Müller, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference. Baden-Baden, Germany, May 2013, 199–209. Available at: www.iscramlive.org/ISCRAM2013/files/132.pdf.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. M. “Is Law a System of Rules?” In Dworkin, R. M. (ed.), The Philosophy of Law. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1977, 38–65.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. “Government Contracting and Renegotiation: A Comparative Analysis.” 50(1) Public Administration (1972), 45–64. Published online in April 2007. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467–9299.1972.tb00080.x/pdfGoogle Scholar
Fellmeth, A. X. and Horwitz, M. Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. and Ury, W., with Patton, B. (ed.). Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Penguin Books. 1991.Google Scholar
Frei, D. Evolving a Conceptual Framework of Inter-Systems Relations: Elements for a Common Theoretical Approach to Cooperative Transactions in East–West Relationships. UNITAR 1980, Research Report No. 25.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.” 92 Harvard Law Review (1978–1979), 353–409.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. “Global Risk, Uncertainty, and Ignorance.” In Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E. (eds.), Global Environmental Risk. United Nations University Press, Earthscan, 2001, 73–94.Google Scholar
Galinksy, A. D. “When to Make the First Offer in Negotiations.” Available at: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4302.html.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W. “Heuristic Decision Making.” 62 Annual Review of Psychology (2011), 451–482.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. and Rojot, J. Negotiation: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Haas, P. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation, Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Haas, P. “Science Policy for Multilateral Environmental Governance.” In Kanie, N. and Haas, P. M. (eds.), Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance, United Nations University Press, 2004, 115–136.Google Scholar
Hall, D. L., Hellar, B., and McNeese, M. “Rethinking the Data Overload Problem: Closing the Gap between Situation Assessment and Decision Making.” In Proceedings of the 2007 National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion (NSSDF) Military Symposia (MSS), Mc Lean, VA, 2007.Google Scholar
Hall, N., Displacement, Development, and Climate Change: International Organizations Moving beyond Their Mandates, Global Institutions Series, Rutledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O. Labour and the Law. Stevens & Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. G. Scorecard Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. “The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.” 24 Michigan Journal of International Law (2003), 1121–1141.Google Scholar
Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., and An, S. G. “The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases.” 23 Psychological Science (2012), 661–668.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. Adaption-Innovation: In the Context of Diversity and Change. Routledge, 2003 (Repr. 2011).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. “The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law.” 26 EJIL (2015), 9–82.Google Scholar
Koh, T. “A Constitution for the Oceans.” Remarks. Available at: www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/koh_english.pdf.Google Scholar
Koh, T. B. and Jayakumar, S. “The Negotiating Process of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea.” In Nordquist, M. H. (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol. 1. Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, 29–134.Google Scholar
Koremenos, B. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. “Constitutionalism as a Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalisation.” 8 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2007), 9–36.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. “The Fate of Public International Law.” 70 MLR (2007), 1–30.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role of the Rule of Law. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kress, C. and von Holtzendorff, L. “The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression.” 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2010), 1179–1217.Google Scholar
Κuhn, T. S. “Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation.” In Savage, C. (ed.), Scientific Theory. University of Minnesota Press, 1990, 298–318.Google Scholar
Κuhn, T. S. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Κuhn, T. S. “Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 1977, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, G. C. “Waste Books” (Sudelbϋcher) (translation, with an introduction by Hollingdale, R. J.). NYBR Classics, 2000.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Κ. Ν. “What Price Contract? An Essay in Perspective.” 40 Yale Law Journal (1931), 704–751.Google Scholar
MacNeil, I. R. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Majone, G. “Science and Tran-Science in Standard Setting.” 9 Science Technology and Human Values Journal (1984), 15–22.Google Scholar
Martineau, A.-C. “The Rhetoric of Fragmentation: Fear and Faith in International Law.” 22 LJIL (2009), 1–19.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. T. “Power Shift.” 76(1) Foreign Affairs (1997), 56–66. Also available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/52644/jessica-t-mathews/power-shift.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, Viking Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. Motivation and Personality. Harper, 1954.Google Scholar
McConnell, M. L. “The Relationship between Science and Politics in Environmental Negotiations.” In Raftopoulos, E. and McConnell, M. L. (eds.), Contributions to International Environmental Negotiation in the Mediterranean Context. MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation-2, Nomiki Bibliothiki SA – Bruylant, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2004) Part IΙ, 81–92.Google Scholar
McDougal, M. and Reisman, W. M. “The Prescribing Function in World Constitutive Process: How International Law Is Made” (1980). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2661. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2661.Google Scholar
McGann, J. and Johnstone, M. “The Power Shift and the NGO Credibility Crisis.” 11 Brown Journal of World Affairs (2005), 159–171.Google Scholar
Merrills, J. G. International Dispute Settlement (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. “The Rise of the Knowledge Broker.” 32(1) Science Communication (2010)SAGE Publications, 118–127. Available at: http://scx.sagepub.com/content/32/1/118.Google Scholar
Michels, R. Political Parties. Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In Winston, P. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, 1975, 211–281. Also available at: http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html.Google Scholar
Monk, R. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. Vintage, 1991.Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (ed.), Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations: Causes and Solutions, Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. The Environment and International Relations (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. and McLean, R. “Approaches to Knowledge-Brokering.” 1997. Available at: www.iisd.org/pdf/2001/networks_knowledge_brokering.pdf.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. (ed.), The Collected Papers of John Westlake on Public International Law. Cambridge University Press, 1914 (paperback edn, 2014).Google Scholar
Osborn, A. F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Scribner, 1953.Google Scholar
Parry, C. The Sources and Evidences of International Law. Manchester University Press-Oceana Publications Inc., 1965.Google Scholar
Parry, C. “Of Treaties.” In Parry, A. (ed.), Collected Papers of Clive Parry, vol. II. Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, 2012, 289–307.Google Scholar
Patton, B. “On Teaching Negotiation.” In Wheeler, M. (ed.), Teaching Negotiation: Ideas and Innovations. PON Books, 2000, 7–61.Google Scholar
Peters, A. “Universalist Assumptions and Implications of Comparative Law: Should They Be Deconstructed?” In Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 1999, 366–369.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. Comparative Governance: Rediscovering the Functional Dimension of Governing. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Pollux, . “The Interpretation of the Charter.” 23 BYBIL (1946), 54–82.Google Scholar
Pollux, Program on Negotiation Harvard Law School. “About the Harvard Negotiation Project.” 19 April, 2009. Available at: www.pon.harvard.edu/research_projects/harvard-negotiation-project/hnp/.Google Scholar
Pound, R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. Yale University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε. Barcelona Convention and Protocols: The Mediterranean Action Plan Regime. Simmonds & Hill Publishing Ltd., 1993.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε. Conventional Environmental Governance and the Mediterranean or PLUS ULTRA (In Greek). Nomiki Bibliothiki SA, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2006).Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε. “Conventional Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean and Its Evolving Institutional and Fiduciary Aspects in a Pragmatic Perspective.” 30 Ocean Yearbook (2016), 129–173.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε. Course, Theory and Language of International Law: “Objectivity” or International Common Interest?” (In Greek). Nomiki Bibliothiki SA, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 1997).Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε. The Inadequacy of the Contractual Analogy in the Law of Treaties. Publications of the Hellenic Institute of International and Foreign Law. Athens, 1990.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε.“International Environmental Negotiation as a Governance Technique.” In Raftopoulos, E. and McConnell, M. L. (eds.), Contributions to International Environmental Negotiation in the Mediterranean Context. MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation-2. Nomiki Bibliothiki SA – Bruylant, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2004) Part I, 3–64.Google Scholar
Raftopoulos, Ε.“Theorizing about Conventional Environmental Sea-Regimes as International Trusts: The Case of the Barcelona Convention System.” In Wolfrum, R., Seršić, M., and Šošić, T. M. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas. Brill-Nijhoff, 2015, Part 2, Law of the Sea, 263–290.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rajamani, L. “The Cancun Climate Agreements: Reading the Text, Subtext and Tea Leaves.” 60 ICLQ (2011), 499–519.Google Scholar
Renton Commission. Τhe Preparation of Legislation. Report of the Renton Commission, London, Cmnd. 6053, 1973.Google Scholar
Riles, A. “Models and Documents: Artifacts of International Legal Knowledge.” 48 ICLQ (1999), 805–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roucounas, E. “Facteurs Privès et Droit International Public.” 299 Recueil des Cours de l’ Académie de Droit International de la Haye (2002), 1–419.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity (transl. by S. Carnell and E. Serge). Allen Lane-Penguin Random House UK, 2016.Google Scholar
Rowold, J. “Instrumental Leadership: Extending the Transformational-Transactional Leadership Paradigm. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung.” 28(3) German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management (2014), 367–390.Google Scholar
Sand, P. “Sovereignty Bounded: Public Trusteeship for Common Pool Resources?” 4(1) Global Environmental Politics (2004), 47–71.Google Scholar
Schwarz, M. and Sonin, K. “A Theory of Brinkmanship, Conflicts, and Commitments.” 24(1) Journal of Law, Economics & Organization (2008), 163–183.Google Scholar
Scott, B. The Skills of Negotiating. Wildwood House, 1986.Google Scholar
Sebenius, J. K. “International Negotiation Analysis.” In Kremenyuk, V. A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass – A Wiley Company, 2002, 229–255.Google Scholar
Sebenius, J. K. “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.” 37 International Organization (1983), 292–298.Google Scholar
Sjostedt, G. “Negotiation on Trade and the Environment: Variation in the Multilateral Approach.” In Kremenyuk, V. A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass – A Wiley Company, 2002, 362–374.Google Scholar
Smith, T. H. “Metaphors for Navigating Negotiations.” 21(3) Negotiation Journal (2005), 343–364.Google Scholar
Sohn, L. B. “United National Decision-Making: Confrontation or Consensus?” 1 Harvard International Law Journal (1974), 438–445.Google Scholar
Spector, B. I. Negotiation as Learning: Pedagogy and Theory. A paper in Honor of Bill Zartman. Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, March 2, 2007, Chicago.Google Scholar
Starkey, B., Boyer, M. A., and Wilkenfeld, J. International Negotiation in a Complex World. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar
Steinman, B. A., Mann, M. E., and Miller, S. K. “Atlantic and Pacific Multidecadal Oscillations and Northern Hemisphere Temperatures.” 347(6225) Science (2015).Google Scholar
Susskind, L. E. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, A. “Labour Resources and Human Resources Management.” In ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety (4th edn), Part III, Chapter 21. Available at: www.ilocis.org/documents/chpt21e.htm.Google Scholar
Tribe, L. H. “The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn from Modern Physics.” 103 Harvard Law Review (1989), 1–39.Google Scholar
Triepel, H. Völkerrecht und Landesrecht, Leipzig, 1899/Droit International et Droit Interne (transl. by René Brunet). Bibliothèque Française de Droit des Gens de la Fondation Carnegie, 1920.Google Scholar
Twining, W. and Miers, D. How to Do Things with Rules (5th edn). Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
UNESCO. The Future of Scientific Advice to the United Nations: A Summary Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations from the Scientific Advisory Board, September 2016, 1–32.Google Scholar
Viñuales, J. “The Paris Climate Agreement: Less Is More.” 59 GYIL (2017), 11–45.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. “Legislators’ Intentions and Unintentional Legislation.” In Marmor, E. (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Clarendon Press, 1997, 329–357.Google Scholar
Walton, R. E. and McKersie, R. B. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
Webber, G. C. N. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wenaweser, C. “Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair’s Perspective.” 23(4) LJIL (2010), 883–887.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. “Language, Mind and Reality.” In Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Widdows, K. “The Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties Containing Νο Denunciation Clause.” 53 BYBIL (1982), 83–114.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations (transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe). Basil Blackwell, 1976.Google Scholar
Woodward, B. Plan of Attack. Wheeler Large Print Book Series, 2004.Google Scholar
Young, O. Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. W. and Berman, M. R. The Practical Negotiator. Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×