Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:11:46.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

Ronán Feehily
Ronán Feehily
Affiliation:
Durham University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Commercial Mediation
Law and Regulation in Comparative Context
 , pp. 311 - 333
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, H. Mediation Representation (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Abramson, H. Mediation Representation: Advocating as a Problem-Solver (In Any Country or Culture) (Louisville: National Institute for Trial Advocacy 2010).Google Scholar
Abramson, H. ‘Mediation Representation: Representing Clients Anywhere’ in Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011), pp. 293–312.Google Scholar
Abramson, H. ‘Mining Mediation Rules for Representation Opportunities and Obstacles’ (2004) 15(1) American Review of International Arbitration 103.Google Scholar
Abramson, H. ‘New Singapore Convention on Cross-Border Mediated Settlements: Key Choices’ in Titi, C. and Gómez, K. Fach (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 360–88.Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. ‘Implied Compulsory Mediation’ (2012) 31(2) Civil Justice Quarterly 151.Google Scholar
Alexander, N. ‘Global Trends in Mediation: Riding the Third Wave’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2003), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Alexander, N. ‘Harmonisation and Diversity in the Private International Law of Mediation: The Rhythms of Regulatory Reform’ in Hopt, K. and Steffek, F. (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 131–204.Google Scholar
Alexander, N. International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives (Austin: Wolters Kluwer 2009).Google Scholar
Alexander, N. ‘The Mediation Metamodel: Understanding Practice’ (2008) 26(1) Conflict Resolution Quarterly 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, N. and Chong, S. The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2019).Google Scholar
Alexander, N., Gottwald, W. and Trenczec, T. ‘Mediation in Germany: The Long and Winding Road’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (2nd ed, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 223–58.Google Scholar
Alexander, N. and LeBaron, M. ‘The Alchemy of Mediation’ in Macduff, I. (ed), Essays on Mediation: Dealing with Disputes in the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2016), pp. 249–269.Google Scholar
Alkon, C. ‘Lost in Translation: Can Exporting ADR Harm Rule of Law Development?’ (2011) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 165.Google Scholar
Allen, T. ‘A Binding Settlement (or Not?): The Mediator’s Dilemma’ (Blog Archive: Mediation Law Developments, CEDR Publications 2014) <www.cedr.com/a-binding-settlement-or-not-the-mediators-dilemma> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Allen, T. Mediation Law and Civil Practice (2nd ed, Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional 2019).Google Scholar
Allen, T. ‘Should Mediators (and Mediation) Be Trusted?’ (2012) 162 New Law Journal 842.Google Scholar
Almoguera, J. ‘Arbitration and Mediation Combined: The Independence and Impartiality of Mediators’ in Fernandez-Ballesteros, M. A. and Arias Lozano, D. (eds), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades (Madrid: Le Lay 2010), pp. 101–30.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (ABA) Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Formal Opinion 06–439 ‘Lawyer’s Obligation of Truthfulness When Representing a Client in Negotiation: Application to Caucused Mediation’ (12 April 2006).Google Scholar
American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, Resolution on Good Faith Requirements for Mediators and Mediation Advocated in Court Mandated Mediation Programs (7 August 2004).Google Scholar
American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, ‘Resolution on Mediation and the Unauthorized Practice of Law’ (2002) < https://americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/dispute_resolution/dispute_resolution/resolution2002.pdf> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Antaki, N. N. ‘Cultural Diversity and ADR Practices in the World’ in Goldsmith, J. C., Ingen-Housz, A. and Pointon, G. H. (eds), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 265–303.Google Scholar
Antrobus, M. and Sutherland, R. ‘Some ADR Techniques in Commercial Disputes: Prospects for Better Business’ in Pretorius, P. (ed), Dispute Resolution (Cape Town: Juta 1993), pp. 163–75.Google Scholar
Apter, I. and Muchnik, C. H. ‘Reservations in the Singapore Convention: Helping to Make the New York Dream Come True’, Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1267–81.Google Scholar
Armstrong, F. ‘Business Litigation and the Litigation Business: Getting to Settlement through Mediation’ (2004) Public Affairs Ireland 4.Google Scholar
Armstrong, F. ‘Lost in Translation’ (August/September 2004) Law Society Gazette 26.Google Scholar
Astor, H. ‘Some Contemporary Theories of Power in Mediation: A Primer for the Puzzled Practitioner’ (2005) 16(1) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 30–39.Google Scholar
Astor, H. and Chinkin, C. Dispute Resolution in Australia (2nd ed, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths 2002).Google Scholar
Auerbach, J. S. Justice Without Law? (New York: Oxford University Press 1983).Google Scholar
Australian National Mediator Accreditation System. Section 6 Practice Standards, ‘Power and Safety’ <https://msb.org.au/themes/msb/assets/documents/national-mediator-accreditation-system.pdf> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Barrett, J. and Feehily, R. Understanding Company Law (Wellington: LexisNexis 2019).Google Scholar
Bartlet, M. ‘Mediation Secrets “In the Shadow of the Law”’ (2015) 34(1) Civil Justice Quarterly 112–26.Google Scholar
Baruch Bush, R. A. and Folger, J. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005).Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H. and Neale, M. A. ‘Improving Negotiation Effectiveness Under Final Offer Arbitration: The Role of Selection and Training’ (1982) 67(5) Journal of Applied Psychology 543–48.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H. and Shonk, K. ‘The Decision Perspective to Negotiation’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 52–65.Google Scholar
Berzon, M. ‘Beyond Altruism: How I Learned to Be a Better Lawyer by Being a Pro Bono Neutral’ (Summer 2004) Dispute Resolution Magazine 27.Google Scholar
Binder, P. International Commercial Arbitration and Mediation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions (4th ed, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2019).Google Scholar
Bingham, T. ‘The Rule of Law’ (2007) 66(1) Cambridge Law Journal 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, R. and Teitz, L. E. ‘US Mediation in the Twenty-First Century: The Path That Brought America to Uniform Laws and Mediation Cyberspace’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2003), pp. 359–96.Google Scholar
Blake, S., Browne, J. and Sime, S. A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution (5th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Blake, S., Browne, J. and Sime, S. The Jackson ADR Handbook (2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Bok, D. C. ‘A Flawed System of Law Practice and Training’ (1983) 33(4) Journal of Legal Education 570–85.Google Scholar
Bond, G. and Wall, C. International Commercial Mediation Training Role-Plays: Cases from the ICC International Commercial Mediation Competition (Paris: International Chamber of Commerce 2015).Google Scholar
Bordone, R. C., Moffitt, M. L. and Sander, F. E. ‘The Next Thirty Years: Directions and Challenges in Dispute Resolution’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 507–20.Google Scholar
Born, G. B. International Commercial Arbitration (3rd ed, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2020).Google Scholar
Boulle, L. Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (3rd ed, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths 2011).Google Scholar
Boulle, L. and Alexander, N. Mediation: A How To Guide (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths 2015).Google Scholar
Boulle, L. and Field, R. Mediation in Australia (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths 2018).Google Scholar
Boulle, L. and Nesic, M. Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Haywards Heath: Butterworths Law 2001).Google Scholar
Boulle, L. and Teh, H. H. Mediation: Principles, Process and Practice (Singapore: Butterworths 2000).Google Scholar
Bowling, D. and Hoffman, D. ‘Bringing Peace into the Room: The Personal Qualities of the Mediator and their Impact on the Mediation’ (2000) 16(1) Negotiation Journal 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigg, M. ‘Mediation, Power and Cultural Difference’ (2003) 20(3) Conflict Resolution Quarterly 287–306.Google Scholar
Briggs, M. ‘Mediation Privilege?’ (2009) 7364 New Law Journal 550–51.Google Scholar
Brooker, P. ‘Mediator Immunity: Time for Evaluation in England and Wales?’ (2016) 36(3) Legal Studies 464–90.Google Scholar
Brower, C. H. ‘Selection of Mediators’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 301–20.Google Scholar
Brown, C. and Winch, P. ‘The Confidentiality and Transparency Debate in Commercial and Investment Mediation’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
Brown, H. and Marriott, A. ADR: Principles and Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell 2018).Google Scholar
Bruneau, J. and Feehily, R. ‘The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: A Threat to the International Trading System or the Panacea for the Economic Predicaments Faced by the EU and the USA?’ (2017) 33(1) Connecticut Journal of International Law 43–92.Google Scholar
Buhring-Uhle, C., Kirchhoff, L. and Scherer, G. Arbitration and Mediation in International Business (2nd ed, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006).Google Scholar
Burger, W. ‘Our Vicious Legal Spiral’ (1977) 16(4) Judges Journal 23–24, 48–49.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. J. A. ‘Mediating International Commercial Disputes: Differences in US and European Approaches’ (2005) 60(3) Dispute Resolution Journal 62–69.Google Scholar
Calkins, R. M. and Lane, F. Lane & Calkins Mediation Practice Guide (New York: Aspen Publishers 2006).Google Scholar
Callahan, R. ‘Mediation Confidentiality: For California Litigants, Why Should Mediation Confidentiality Be a Function of the Court in which the Litigation is Pending?’ (2012) 12(1) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 63–96.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes Within the Framework of the World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement’ (1993) 56(3) Modern Law Review 282–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, E. ‘The Future Belongs to Mediation and its Clients’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 397–408.Google Scholar
CEDR, ‘Mediation Training’ <www.cedr.com/skills/individuals/mediationtraining/advocacy> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
CEDR, Model Mediation Procedure: 2020 Edition <www.cedr.com> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Center for Professional Responsibility, Annotated Model Rules of Professional Conduct (9th ed, Chicago: American Bar Association 2019).Google Scholar
Chern, C. International Commercial Mediation (London: Informa 2008).Google Scholar
Chern, C. The Commercial Mediator’s Handbook (London: Informa 2015).Google Scholar
Chong, S. and Steffek, F. ‘Enforcement of International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation under the Singapore Convention: Private International Law Issues in Perspective’ (2019) 31 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 448, 452, 456.Google Scholar
Christie, N. ‘Conflicts as Property’ (1977) 17(1) British Journal of Criminology 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. and Sourdin, T. ‘The Singapore Convention: A Solution in Search of a Problem?’ (2020) 71(3) Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 481.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. C. ‘Dispute Resolution in China’ in Lee, T. V. (ed), Contract, Guanxi, and Dispute Resolution in China (New York: Garland 1997), pp. 369–420.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. ‘The Future of Civil Mediation’ (2008) 74(4) Arbitration 419–23.Google Scholar
Coben, J. R. ‘Evaluating the Singapore Convention through a US-Centric Litigation Lens: Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Mediation Disputes in American Federal and State Courts’ in Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1063–1102.Google Scholar
Coben, J. R. and Thompson, P. N. ‘Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation About Mediation’ (2006) 11 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 43.Google Scholar
Coe, J. J. ‘Concurrent Co-Mediation: Toward a More Collaborative Centre of Gravity in Investor–State Dispute Resolution’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. R. ‘A Taxonomy of Dispute Resolution Ethics’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 244–53.Google Scholar
Cole, L. ‘Exploring International Mediation, Past, Present and Beyond’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 315–23.Google Scholar
Collins, R. and Albornoz, M. M. ‘On the Dwindling Divide Between Public and Private: The Role of Soft Law Instruments in Global Governance’ in Abou-Nigm, V. R., McCall-Smith, K. and French, D., Linkages and Boundaries in Private and Public International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2018), pp. 105–20.Google Scholar
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), ‘Guidelines on Conciliation Proceedings’, GN 896, GG 18936, June 1998.Google Scholar
Comte-Sponville, A. A Short Treatise on the Great Virtues: The Uses of Philosophy in Everyday Life (London: Heinemann 2002).Google Scholar
Cornes, D. ‘Mediator Fails to Have Witness Summons Set Aside: Farm Assist Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (No 2)’ (2009) 75(4) Arbitration 582–89.Google Scholar
Courts Service of Ireland, ‘Judges of the Commercial Court’ <www.courts.ie/judges-commercial-court> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Crawford, D. K. and Bodine, R. J. ‘Youths, Education and Dispute Resolution’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 471–86.Google Scholar
Cremades, B. M. ‘Overcoming the Clash of Legal Cultures: The Role of Interactive Arbitration’ (1998) 14(2) Arbitration International 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creo, R. A. ‘Business and Practice Issues of US Mediators’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 309–39.Google Scholar
Crown, C. H. ‘Are Mandatory Mediation Clauses Enforceable?’ (2010) 29(2) Litigation Journal 3.Google Scholar
Davies, P. S. ‘Negotiating the Boundaries of Admissibility’ (2011) 70(1) Cambridge Law Journal 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Palo, G. and Canessa, R. ‘Sleeping? Comatose? Only Mandatory Consideration of Mediation Can Awake Sleeping Beauty in the European Union’ (2014) 16(3) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 713.Google Scholar
De Palo, G. and Carmeli, S. ‘Mediation in Continental Europe: A Meandering Path Toward Efficient Regulation’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 340–55.Google Scholar
De Palo, G., D’Urso, L., Trevor, M., Canessa, R., Cawyer, B., Regan Florence, L. ‘“Rebooting” the Mediation Directive: Assessing the Limited Impact of Its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU’ (Luxembourg: European Parliament 2014).Google Scholar
De Vera, C. ‘Arbitrating Harmony: Med-Arb and the Confluence of Culture and the Rule of Law in the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes in China’ (2004) 18(1) Columbia Journal of Asian Law 149.Google Scholar
Deason, E. E. ‘Procedural Rules for Complementary Systems of Litigation and Mediation – Worldwide’ (2005) 80(2) Notre Dame Law Review 553.Google Scholar
Deason, E. E. ‘What’s in a Name? The Terms “Commercial” and “Mediation” in the Singapore Convention on Mediation’, Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1149–72.Google Scholar
Deekshitha, S. and Saha, A. ‘Amalgamating the Conciliatory and the Adjudicative: Hybrid Processes and Asian Arbitral Institutions’ (2014) 3(1) Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 76.Google Scholar
del Ceno, J. S. ‘Case Comment: Mediated Settlements and Enforceable Settlements: Frost v Wake Smith’ (2013) 79(4) Arbitration 467–69.Google Scholar
Dingwall, R. and Cloatre, E. ‘Vanishing Trials? An English Perspective’ (2006) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 51–70.Google Scholar
Donahey, M. S. ‘Seeking Harmony: Is the Asian Concept of the Conciliator/Arbitrator Applicable in the West?’ (1995) 50(2) Dispute Resolution Journal 74.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. ‘A Word on Halsey v Milton Keynes’ (2011) 77(3) Arbitration 337–41 (3rd Annual Mediation Symposium of the Chartered Institute of Arbitration, London, October 2010)Google Scholar
Dyson, J. ‘Halsey 10 Years On: The Decision Revisited’ in Justice: Continuity and Change (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2018), pp. 379–94.Google Scholar
Edwards, H. T. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?’ (1985–1986) 99(3) Harvard Law Review 668.Google Scholar
Eijsbouts, A. J. A. J. ‘Mediation as a Management Tool in Corporate Governance’ in Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011), pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
Ervasti, K. ‘Past, Present and Future of Mediation in Nordic Countries’ in Nylund, A., Ervasti, K. and Adrian, L. (eds), Nordic Mediation Research (Cham: Springer 2018), pp. 225–68.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘EU Overview on Mediation’ (18 January 2019) <https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_eu_overview_on_mediation-63-en.do> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
European e-Justice, ‘Mediation in Member States: Sweden’ (18 March 2013) <https://e-justice.europa.eu> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Fach Gómez, K. ‘The Role of Mediation in International Commercial Disputes: Reflections on Some Technological, Ethical and Educational Challenges’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘An Alternative Approach to Postgraduate Legal Education’ in Feehily, R. and Seeparsad, S. (eds), Governance, Globalisation and Dispute Resolution (New Delhi: Star Publications 2017), 46–64.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Commercial Mediation Agreements and Enforcement in South Africa’ (2016) 49(2) Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 305.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Commercial Mediation and the Costs Conundrum’ (2019) 23(1) Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 1.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Commercial Mediation: Commercial Conflict Panacea or an Affront to Due Process and the Justice Ideal?’ (2015) 48(2) Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 317.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Confidentiality in Commercial Mediation: A Fine Balance (Part 1)’ (2015) 3 Journal of South African Law/Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 516.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Confidentiality in Commercial Mediation: A Fine Balance (Part 2)’ (2015) 4 Journal of South African Law/Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 719–37.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Costs Sanctions: The Critical Instrument in the Development of Commercial Mediation in South Africa’ (2009) 126(2) South African Law Journal 291.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Creeping Compulsion to Mediate: The Constitution and the Convention’ (2018) 69(2) Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 127.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Learning to Think Like a Lawyer’ (2018) 9(1) Mauritius Institute of Education, Journal of Education 23.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Mediation as an Instrument of Transitional Justice’, Harvard Law School Symposium on Restorative Justice, Harvard University, USA, 5–8 February 2019.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Neutrality, Independence and Impartiality in International Commercial Arbitration: A Fine Balance in the Quest for Arbitral Justice’ (2019) 7(1) Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 88.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Problem Based Learning and International Commercial Dispute Resolution in the Indian Ocean’ (2018) 52(1) The Law Teacher 17–37.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘Separability in International Commercial Arbitration: Confluence, Conflict and the Appropriate Limitations in the Development and Application of the Doctrine’ (2018) 34(3) Arbitration International 355–83.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Certainty of Settlement’ (2016) 27(1) Stellenbosch Law Review 25.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Contractual Certainty of Commercial Agreements to Mediate in Ireland’ (2016) 6(1) Irish Journal of Legal Studies 59–105.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Development of Commercial Mediation in South Africa in View of the Experience in Europe, North America and Australia’ (PhD thesis, University of Cape Town 2008).Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Legal Status and Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements’ (2013) 12(1) Hibernian Law Journal 1–26.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Role of the Commercial Mediator in the Mediation Process: A Critical Analysis of the Legal and Regulatory Issues’ (2015) 132(2) South African Law Journal 372.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. ‘The Role of the Lawyer in the Mediation Process: A Critical Analysis of the Legal and Regulatory Issues’ (2016) 133(2) South African Law Journal 352.Google Scholar
Feehily, R. and Tiong, R. An Introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (Wellington: Thomson Reuters 2018).Google Scholar
Feehily, R. and Tiong, R. Commercial Law and the Legal System (Wellington: Thomson Reuters 2020).Google Scholar
Fiechter, E. ‘Mediation: Confidentiality and Enforcement Issues and Solutions’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, April 2005.Google Scholar
Filler, E. A. (ed), Commercial Mediation in Europe: An Empirical Study of the User Experience, Global Trends in Dispute Resolution, Book 5 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2012).Google Scholar
Fisher, W. and Ury, R. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (New York: Penguin 1981) updated and most recently revised in 2012 (London: Business Books).Google Scholar
Fiss, O. ‘Against Settlement’ (1984) 93(6) Yale Law Journal 1073–90.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. ‘Out of Eden’ (1985) 94(4) Yale Law Journal 1669–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forestieri, I. and Paech, P. ‘Mediation of Financial Disputes’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 207–22.Google Scholar
Fortún, A. and Iglesia, A. ‘Mediation and Other ADR in International Construction Disputes’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 278–99.Google Scholar
Frenkel, D. N. and Stark, J. H. The Practice of Mediation (2nd ed, New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2012).Google Scholar
Fuller, L. ‘Mediation: Its Form and Functions’ (1971) 44(2) Southern California Law Review 305.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. and Winston, K. ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92(2) Harvard Law Review 353–409.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. ‘A World Without Trials?’ (2006) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 7.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. ‘Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don’t Know (and Think We Know) About our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society’ (1983) 31(1) UCLA Law Review 4.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. ‘The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts’ (2004) 1(3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 459–570.Google Scholar
Genn, H. Judging Civil Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Genn, H. ‘Why the Privatisation of Justice Is a Civil Law Issue’, 36th FA Mann Lecture, Lincoln’s Inn, 19 November 2012.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulos, A., Coleman, H. and Storrow, R. ‘Organisational Conflict Management Systems, The Emergence of Mediators as Conflict Resolution Professionals’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 153–63.Google Scholar
Gibson, K., Thompson, L. and Bazerman, M. H. ‘Shortcomings of Neutrality in Mediation: Solutions Based on Rationality’ (1996) 12(1) Negotiation Journal 69–80.Google Scholar
Giddings, J., Frazer, L., Weaven, S. and Grace, A. ‘Understanding the Dynamics of Conflict Within Business Franchise Systems’ (2009) 20(1) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 24–32.Google Scholar
Golann, D. and Folberg, J. Mediation: The Roles of Advocate and Neutral (3rd ed, New York: Wolters Kluwer 2016).Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. B. ‘Mediating the Deal: How to Maximise Value by Enlisting a Neutral’s Help At and Around the Bargaining Table’ (2006) 24(9) Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 147.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., Rogers, N. H., Rudolph Cole, S. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, and Other Processes (7th ed, New York: Wolters Kluwer 2020).Google Scholar
Gray, B. ‘Mediation as a Post-Modern Practice: A Challenge to the Cornerstones of Mediation’s Legitimacy’ (2006) 17(4) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 208.Google Scholar
Guillemin, J. F. ‘Reasons for Choosing Alternative Dispute Resolution’ in Goldsmith, J. C., Ingen-Housz, A. and Pointon, G. H. (eds), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 21–52.Google Scholar
Hanks, M. ‘Perspectives on Mandatory Mediation’ (2012) 35(3) University of New South Wales Law Journal 929–52.Google Scholar
Hartley, T. International Commercial Litigation: Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law (3rd ed, Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Hensler, D. R. ‘Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement is Re-Shaping our Legal System’ (2003) 108(1) Penn State Law Review 165.Google Scholar
Hensler, D. R. ‘Suppose It’s Not True: Challenging Mediation Ideology’ (2002) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 81.Google Scholar
Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, ‘Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales’, Vol 2 (London 1995).Google Scholar
Hill, J. ‘The Exercise of Judicial Discretion in Relation to Applications to Enforce Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention 1958’ (2016) 36(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinshaw, A. ‘Regulating Mediators’ (2016) 21(2) Harvard Negotiation Law Review 163.Google Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, R. and Tyler, T. R. ‘Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (2011) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 1–19.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. and Steffek, F. ‘Mediation: Comparison of Laws, Regulatory Models, Fundamental Issues’ in Hopt, K. and Steffek, F. (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 3–130.Google Scholar
Howard, A. EU Cross-Border Commercial Mediation: Listening to Disputants – Changing the Frame; Framing the Changes (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2021).Google Scholar
Hughes, S. H. ‘The Uniform Mediation Act: To the Spoiled Go the Privileges’ (2001) 85 Marquette Law Review 9.Google Scholar
IMI, ‘Certify’ <https://imimediation.org/practitioners/certify> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011).Google Scholar
International Bar Association, ‘Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2014) <https://ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=e2fe5e72-eb14-4bba-b10d-d33dafee8918> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Jackson, R. Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report (Ministry of Justice, December 2009).Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. ‘Confidentiality in Mediation: Right or Risk’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, September 2006.Google Scholar
Jarrosson, C. ‘Legal Issues Raised by ADR’ in Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011), pp. 157–82.Google Scholar
Jarrosson, C. ‘Legal Issues Raised by ADR’ in Goldsmith, J. C., Ingen-Housz, A and Pointon, G. H. (eds), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 111–33.Google Scholar
Jones, D. ‘Various Non-Binding (ADR) Processes’ in van den Berg, A. J. (ed), New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2005) (ICCA Congress Series vol 12), pp. 367–414.Google Scholar
Jones, T. ‘Using Costs to Encourage Mediation: Cautionary Tales on the Limits of Good Intentions’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, September 2006.Google Scholar
Kadayifci-Orellana, S. A. ‘Religion and Mediation, Strange Bedfellows or Natural Allies?’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 369–78.Google Scholar
Kallipetis, M. ‘Singapore Convention Defences Based on Mediator’s Misconduct: Articles 5.1(e) and (f)’, Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1197–1207.Google Scholar
Kallipetis, M. and Ruttle, S. ‘Better Dispute Resolution: The Development and Practice of Mediation in the United Kingdom Between 1995 and 2005’ in Goldsmith, J. C., Ingen-Housz, A. and Pointon, G. H. (eds), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 191–248.Google Scholar
Katz, N. H. ‘Mediation and Dispute Resolution Services in Higher Education’ in Georgakopoulos, A (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 170–78.Google Scholar
Koo, A. K. C. ‘Confidentiality of Mediation Communications’ (2011) 30(2) Civil Justice Quarterly 192–203.Google Scholar
Koo, A. K. C. ‘Exploring Mediator Liability in Negligence’ (2016) 45 Common Law World Review 165.Google Scholar
Koo, A. K. C. ‘Ten Years after Halsey’ (2015) 34(1) Civil Justice Quarterly 77.Google Scholar
Koo, A. K. C. ‘Unreasonable Refusal to Mediate: The Need for a Principled Approach: PGF II’ (2014) 33(3) Civil Justice Quarterly 261.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. ‘The Role of Law in Settlement’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 254–76.Google Scholar
Kovach, K. K. ‘Mediation’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005).Google Scholar
Kovach, K. K. and Love, L. ‘Mapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin’s Grid’ (1998) 3 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 71.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. ‘Disappearing Trials? A Comparative Perspective’ (2004) 1(3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 735–54.Google Scholar
Kronke, H. ‘Introduction: The New York Convention Fifty Years On: Overview and Assessment’ in Kronke, H. and others (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010) pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., Otto, D. and Port, N. C. (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010).Google Scholar
Kronman, A. The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1995).Google Scholar
Kulms, R. ‘Mediation in the USA: Alternative Dispute Resolution Between Legalism and Self-Determination’ in Hopt, K. and Steffek, F. (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 1245–1328.Google Scholar
Kulms, R. ‘Privatising Civil Justice and the Day in Court’ in Hopt, K. and Steffek, F. (eds), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 205–44.Google Scholar
Kupfer Schneider, A. ‘Public and Private International Dispute Resolution’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 438–54.Google Scholar
Lande, J. ‘“The Vanishing Trial” Report: An Alternative View of the Data’ (Summer 2004) Dispute Resolution Magazine 19.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, T. and Storgaard, A. ‘Nordic Mediation: Comparing Denmark and Finland’ (2015) 27 Neue Kriminalpolitik 136–47.Google Scholar
Lau, K. ‘Mediation in a Cross-Cultural Setting: What a Mediator Should Know’ (2014) 25(4) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 221.Google Scholar
Law Council of Australia, Guidelines for Lawyers in Mediations (2011).Google Scholar
Law Society Code of Practice, Civil and Commercial Mediation Accreditation Scheme (England and Wales, 2011).Google Scholar
Law Society of New South Wales, Dispute Resolution Kit (2012).Google Scholar
Lax, D. and Sabenius, J. 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game In Your Most Important Deals (Boston: Harvard Business School Press 2006).Google Scholar
Leach, P. Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights (3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Leff, A. A. ‘Law and … ’ (1978) 87(5) Yale Law Journal 989–1011.Google Scholar
Leoveanu, A. and Erac, A. ‘ICC Mediation: Paving the Way Forward’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B. and Saunders, D. Essentials of Negotiation (6th ed, New York: McGraw Hill 2016).Google Scholar
Lightman, G. ‘In My Opinion … CEDR Mediation Training for a Judge’ (CEDR Publications, 27 November 2007).Google Scholar
Lightman, G. ‘Mediation: An Approximation to Justice’ (2007) 73(4) Arbitration 400–2.Google Scholar
Lipsky, D. B. and Seeber, R. L. The Appropriate Resolution of Corporate Disputes: A Report on the Growing Use of ADR by US Corporations (Ithaca: Institute on Conflict Resolution 1998).Google Scholar
Lopez, G. A. ‘Conclusion: The Future of Mediation in a Changing World’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017).Google Scholar
Lorcher, G. ‘Enforceability of Agreed Awards in Foreign Jurisdictions’ (2001) 17(3) Arbitration International 275.Google Scholar
Love, L. ‘The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate’ (1997) 24(2) Florida State University Law Review 937.Google Scholar
Lovenheim, P. and Guerin, L. Mediate, Don’t Litigate: Strategies for Successful Mediation (Berkeley: Nolo 2004).Google Scholar
Ludwig, E. V. ‘A Judge’s View: The Trial/ADR Interface’ (Summer 2004) Dispute Resolution Magazine 13.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, J. The New Lawyer: How Clients Are Transforming the Practice of Law (2nd ed, University of British Columbia Press 2017).Google Scholar
Mackie, K., Miles, D., Marsh, W. and Allen, T. The ADR Practice Guide: Commercial Dispute Resolution (3rd ed, Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2007).Google Scholar
Main, T. O. ‘ADR: The New Equity’ (2005) 74 University of Cincinnati Law Review 329.Google Scholar
Marchisio, G. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Consent Awards: Accepting Their Reality’ (2016) 32(2) Arbitration International 331.Google Scholar
Marsh, B. ‘The Development of Mediation in Central and Eastern Europe’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 384–94.Google Scholar
Mattl, C., Prokop-Zischka, A. and Ferz, S. ‘Mediation in Austria’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (2nd ed, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Mayer, B. Beyond Neutrality: Confronting the Crisis in Conflict Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2004).Google Scholar
Mayer, B. The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution: A Practitioner’s Guide (2nd ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2012).Google Scholar
McCormick, K. and Ong, S. S. M. ‘Through the Looking Glass: An Insider’s Perspective into the Making of the Singapore Convention on Mediation’ (2019) 31 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 520.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. ‘The Growing Importance of Regional Mediation Centres in Asia’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 160–81.Google Scholar
McRedmond, P. Mediation Law (Dublin: Bloomsbury Professional 2018).Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘Is Mediation the Practice of Law?’ (1996) 14(5) Alternatives to the High Costs of Litigation 57.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. Mediation and Its Application for Good Decision Making and Dispute Resolution (Cambridge, UK: Intersentia 2016).Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘Roots and Inspirations: A Brief History of the Foundations of Dispute Resolution’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘The Future of Mediation Worldwide: Legal and Cultural Variations in the Uptake of Resistance to Mediation’ in Macduff, I., Essays on Mediation: Dealing with Disputes in the 21st Century (Alphen aan der Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2016), pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘Whose Dispute Is It Anyway? A Philosophic and Democratic Defense of Settlement (In Some Cases)’ (1995) 83(7) Georgetown Law Journal 2663.Google Scholar
Merrills, J. G. International Dispute Settlement (6th ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Mills, A. ‘Variable Geometry, Peer Governance, and the Public International Perspective on Private International Law’ in Muir Watt, H. and Fernández Arroy, D. P. (eds), Private International Law and Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014), pp. 245–61.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Solving Disputes in the County Courts: Creating a Simpler, Quicker and More Proportionate System – A Consultation on Reforming Civil Justice in England and Wales – The Government Response (Cm 8274, February 2012).Google Scholar
Mistelis, L. A. ‘ADR in England and Wales: A Successful Case of Public Private Partnership’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (2nd ed, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 139–80.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. M. and Kornhauser, L. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1979) 88(5) Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. ‘Casting Light on the Black Box of Mediation: Should Mediators Make Their Conduct More Transparent?’ (1997) 13(1) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 1.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. ‘Disputes as Opportunities to Create Value’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 173–88.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. ‘Ten Ways to Get Sued: A Guide for Mediators’ (2003) 8 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 81.Google Scholar
Moore, C. W. ‘Mediation Within and Between Organisations’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 139–52.Google Scholar
Moore, C. W. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict (4th ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2014).Google Scholar
Morris, G. and Shaw, A. Mediation in New Zealand (Wellington: Thomson Reuters 2018).Google Scholar
Morris-Sharma, N. Y. ‘The Singapore Convention is Live, and Multilateralism, Alive!’ in Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1009.Google Scholar
Mowatt, J. G. ‘Mediation and Chinese Legal Theory’ (1989) 106(2) South African Law Journal 349.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, L. ‘The Collective Interest in Private Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 33(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 59.Google Scholar
National Mediator Accreditation System, ‘National Mediator Accreditation Standards’, <https://msb.org.au/themes/msb/assets/documents/national-mediator-accreditation-system.pdf> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Neuberger, D. ‘Equity, ADR, Arbitration and the Law: Different Dimensions of Justice’, The Fourth Keating Lecture, 2010.Google Scholar
New York University School of Law, Civil Jury Project, <https://civiljuryproject.law.nyu.edu> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Newmark, C. and Hill, R. ‘Can a Mediated Settlement Agreement Become an Enforceable Arbitration Award?’ (2008) 16(1) Arbitration International 81.Google Scholar
Nigmatullina, D. Combining Mediation and Arbitration in International Commercial Dispute Resolution (New York: Routledge 2018).Google Scholar
Nitschke, F. ‘ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: University Press 2019), pp. 121–43.Google Scholar
Nolan-Haley, J. M. ‘Mediation Exceptionality’ (2009) 78(3) Fordham Law Review 1247–64.Google Scholar
Nolan-Haley, J. M. ‘Mediation: The Best and Worst of Times’ (2015) 16(3) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 731.Google Scholar
Nylund, A., Ervasti, K. and Adrian, L. ‘Introduction to Nordic Mediation Research’ in Nylund, A., Ervasti, K. and Adrian, L. (eds), Nordic Mediation Research (Cham: Springer 2018).Google Scholar
Otto, D. and Elwana, O. ‘Article V(2)’ in Kronke, H. and others (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2010), pp. 345–414.Google Scholar
Ozoke, V. ‘From Peers to Community, Transferring Peer Mediation Skills from School to Community’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 243–50.Google Scholar
Patton, B. ‘Negotiation’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 279–303.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J. (eds), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Pepper, R. ‘Contract Formation in Imperfect Markets: Should We Use Mediators in Deals?’ (2004) 19(2) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 283.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: An English Viewpoint’ (2008) 74(4) Arbitration 406–18.Google Scholar
Pirie, A. ‘The Lawyer as Mediator: Professional Responsibility Problems or Profession Problems?’ (1985) 63(2) Canadian Bar Review 378.Google Scholar
Plapinger, E. and Stienstra, D. ADR and Settlement in the Federal District Courts: A Sourcebook for Judges and Lawyers (Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center 1996).Google Scholar
Poorooye, A. and Feehily, R. ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in International Commercial Arbitration: Finding the Right Balance’ (2017) 22(2) Harvard Negotiation Law Review 275.Google Scholar
Posner, R. Economic Analysis of Law (8th ed, Austin: Wolters Kluwer 2011).Google Scholar
Pretorius, P. ‘Introduction and Overview’ in P. Pretorius (ed), Dispute Resolution (Cape Town: Juta 1993), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Pretorius, P. ‘Commercial Mediation in the Southern African Development Community’, Arbitration Workshop, Mauritius, April 2007.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission, Access to Justice Arrangements: Report, vol 1 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2014).Google Scholar
Pryles, M. ‘Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2001) 18(2) Journal of International Arbitration 159–76.Google Scholar
Purnell, S. ‘The Attorney as Mediator: Inherent Conflict of Interest?’ (1985) 32(5) UCLA Law Review 986.Google Scholar
Queensland Law Society, Standards of Conduct for Solicitor Mediators (1996).Google Scholar
Rampall, Y. and Feehily, R. ‘The Sanctity of Party Autonomy and the Powers of Arbitrators to Determine the Applicable Law: The Quest for an Arbitral Equilibrium’ (2018) 23(2) Harvard Negotiation Law Review 345.Google Scholar
Resnik, J. ‘Managerial Judges’ (1982) 96(2) Harvard Law Review 374.Google Scholar
Richbell, D. ‘Mediating Multi-Party Disputes’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 229–38.Google Scholar
Riskin, L. ‘Retiring and Replacing the Grid of Mediator Orientations’ (2003) 21(4) Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 69–76.Google Scholar
Riskin, L. ‘Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed’ (1996) 1 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 7.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. ‘“Listing Concentrates the Mind”: The English Civil Court as an Arena for Structured Negotiation’ (2009) 29(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 457–79.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology (2nd ed, Louisiana: Quid Pro Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Roberts, S. and Palmer, M. Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making (revised ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Roebuck, D. Ancient Greek Arbitration (Oxford, Holo Books: Arbitration Press 2001).Google Scholar
Roebuck, D. ‘The Myth of Modern Mediation’ (2007) 73(1) Arbitration 105–16.Google Scholar
Roebuck, D. and de Loynes de Fumichon, B. Roman Arbitration (Oxford, Holo Books: Arbitration Press 2004).Google Scholar
Rogers, N., Bordone, R. C., Sander, F. E. A. and McEwen, C. A. Designing Systems and Processes for Managing Disputes (2nd ed, New York: Wolters Kluwer 2019).Google Scholar
Runesson, E. and Guy, M. L. Mediating Corporate Governance Conflicts and Disputes (International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group 2007), available at <www.ifc.org> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
Rycroft, A. ‘Settlement and the Law’ (2013) 130(1) South African Law Journal 187.Google Scholar
Sander, F. ‘Varieties of Dispute Processing: Address Before the National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice’ (1976) 70 Federal Rules Decisions 79.Google Scholar
Sander, F. and Goldberg, S. ‘Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: A User‐Friendly Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure’ (1994) 10(1) Negotiation Journal 49.Google Scholar
Sander, F. and Rozdeiczer, L. ‘Selecting an Appropriate Dispute Resolution Procedure: Detailed Analysis and Simplified Solution’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 386–406.Google Scholar
Sanders, P. ‘UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation’ (2007) 23(1) Arbitration International 105.Google Scholar
Scanlon, K. M. and Bryan, K. A. ‘Will the Next Generation of Dispute Resolution Clause Drafting Include Model Arb-Med Clauses?’ in Rovine, A. W. (ed), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers (Leiden: Brill 2010), pp. 429–35.Google Scholar
Schnabel, T. ‘Implementation of the Singapore Convention: Federalism, Self-Execution, and Private Law Treaties’ (2019) 30(2) American Review of International Arbitration 265.Google Scholar
Schnabel, T. ‘Recognition by any Other Name: Article 3 of the Singapore Convention on Mediation’ in Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1181.Google Scholar
Schnabel, T. ‘The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Framework for the Cross-Border Recognition and Enforcement of Mediated Settlements’ (2019) 19(1) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Seul, J. R. ‘Litigation as a Dispute Resolution Alternative’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 336–57.Google Scholar
Shack, J. ‘Efficiency: Mediation Can Bring Gains, But Under What Conditions?’ (Winter 2003) Dispute Resolution Magazine 11.Google Scholar
Shaffer, T. L. and McThenia, A. W. ‘For Reconciliation’ (1985) 94(7) Yale Law Journal 1660–68.Google Scholar
Shestack, J. ‘Introduction’ in Van Winkle, J. R., Mediation: A Path for the Lost Lawyer (Chicago: American Bar Association 2001), pp. vii–xii.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. and Brett, J. ‘Disputants’ Preferences for Dispute Resolution Procedures: An Ex Ante and Ex Post Longitudinal Empirical Study’ (2008) 41(1) Connecticut Law Review 63.Google Scholar
Shipman, S. ‘Compulsory Mediation: The Elephant in the Room’ (2011) 30(2) Civil Justice Quarterly 163.Google Scholar
Shipman, S. ‘Waiver: Canute Against the Tide?’ (2013) 32(4) Civil Justice Quarterly 470.Google Scholar
Shub, O. ‘Evidence Act Trumps Confidentiality Clause of Mediation Agreement’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, April 2005.Google Scholar
Singapore Mediation Convention Reference Book (2019) 20(4) Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution.Google Scholar
Smith, R. Textbook on International Human Rights (5th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Sourdin, T. ‘Mediation in Australia: Impacts on Litigation’ in Alexander, N. (ed), Global Trends in Mediation (2nd ed, The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
South African Law Commission, Project 94: Domestic Arbitration Report (2001).Google Scholar
Southern California Mediation Association, Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners, Rojas v Superior Court 33 Cal 4th 407 (2004).Google Scholar
Spencer, D. ‘The Decline of the Trial in Australia’ (2011) 30(2) Arbitrator and Mediator 1.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. ‘Uncertainty and ADR Clauses: The Victorian View’ (2001) 12(4) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 214–18.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. ‘Uncertainty and Incompleteness in Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (1995) 2 Commercial Dispute Resolution Journal 23–40.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. and Brogan, M. Mediation Law and Practice (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Steele, B. L. ‘Enforcing International Commercial Mediation Agreements as Arbitral Awards Under the New York Convention’ (2007) 54(5) UCLA Law Review 1385.Google Scholar
Steffek, F. ‘Mediation’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K., Zimmerman, R. and Stier, A. (eds), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law, vol 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012), p. 1163.Google Scholar
Steffek, F. ‘Principled Regulation of Dispute Resolution: Taxonomy, Policy, Topics’ in Steffek, F., Unberath, H., Genn, H., Greger, R. and Menkel-Meadow, C. (eds), Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2013), pp. 33–61.Google Scholar
Steffek, F., Unberath, H. and others, ‘Guide for Regulating Dispute Resolution (GRDR): Principles’ in Steffek, F. and others (eds), Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2013), pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
Steffek, F., Unberath, H. and others, ‘Guide for Regulating Dispute Resolution (GRDR): Principles and Comments’ in Steffek, F. and others (eds), Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2013), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Sternlight, J. R. ‘Creeping Mandatory Arbitration: Is it Just?’ (2005) 57(5) Stanford Law Review 1631.Google Scholar
Stipanowich, T. J. ‘ADR and “The Vanishing Trial”’ (Summer 2004) Dispute Resolution Magazine 7.Google Scholar
Stipanowich, T. J. ‘ADR and the “Vanishing Trial”: The Growth and Impact of “Alternative Dispute Resolution”’ (2004) 1(3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 843.Google Scholar
Stipanowich, T. J. and Lamare, J. R. ‘Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration and Conflict Management in Fortune 1,000 Corporations’ (2014) 19 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1–68.Google Scholar
Stone, R. Textbook on Civil Liberties and Human Rights (10th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Storrow, R. ‘Institutionalised Mediation and Access to Justice in the State Court System in the United States’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 192–99.Google Scholar
Straw, B. M. ‘The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action’ (1981) 6(4) Academy of Management Review 577.Google Scholar
Street, L. ‘Commentary on Some Aspects of the Advent and Practice of Mediation in Australia’ in Newmark, C. and Monaghan, A. (eds), Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation (Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing 2005), pp. 356–83.Google Scholar
Street, L. ‘Mediation and the Judicial Institution’ (1997) 71(10) Australian Law Journal 794.Google Scholar
Street, L. ‘Note on the Detachment of Judges to Mediation’ (2006) 17(4) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 188.Google Scholar
Strong, S. I. ‘Applying the Lessons of International Commercial Arbitration to International Commercial Mediation: A Dispute System Design Analysis’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Strong, S. I. ‘Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation’ (2016) 73(4) Washington and Lee Law Review 1973.Google Scholar
Stulberg, J. B. ‘The UMA: Some Roads Not Taken’ (2003) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 221.Google Scholar
Summers, R. ‘Good Faith in General Contract Law and Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code’ (1968) 54(2) Virginia Law Review 195–267.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. E. ‘Consensus Building and ADR: Why They Are Not the Same Thing’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 358–70.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘A Brief Survey of US Case Law on Enforcing Mediation Settlement Agreements over Objections to the Existence or Validity of Such Agreements and Implications for Mediation Confidentiality and Mediator Testimony’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, April 2006.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘A Path Forward: A Convention for the Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements’ (2015) 6 Transnational Dispute Management 1.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘Combinations and Permutations of Arbitration and Mediation: Issues and Solutions’ in Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011), pp. 381–98.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘Developing an Effective Med-Arb/Arb-Med Process’ (2009) 2(1) New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer 71.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘Med-Arb: An Argument for Favouring ex parte Communications in the Mediation Phase’ (2013) 7(2) World Arbitration and Mediation Review 1.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘The New York Convention through a Mediation Prism’ (2009) 15(4) Dispute Resolution Magazine 10.Google Scholar
Sussman, E. ‘The Singapore Convention: Promoting the Recognition and Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements’ (2018) 3 ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin (Paris) 42.Google Scholar
Symeonides, S. C. Choice of Law, The Oxford Commentaries on American Law (New York: Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Taelman, P. and Van Severen, C. Civil Procedure in Belgium (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2018).Google Scholar
Tapper, C. Cross and Tapper on Evidence (13th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Thanki, B. (ed), The Law of Privilege (3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Tirado, J. and Vincente Maravall, E. ‘Codes of Conduct for Commercial and Investment Mediators’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 342–59.Google Scholar
Titi, C. ‘Mediation and the Settlement of International Investment Disputes: Between Utopia and Realism’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Trollip, A. T. Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Contemporary South African Context (Durban: Butterworths 1991).Google Scholar
Tuchmann, E., Frisch, T. B., Micheli, G. and Quiroz, Y. ‘The International Centre for Dispute Resolution’s Mediation Practice and Experience’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 101–20.Google Scholar
Tumbridge, J. ‘Mediators: Confidentiality and Compulsion to Give Evidence’ (2010) 21(4) International Company and Commercial Law Review 144.Google Scholar
UK Civil Justice Council, Compulsory ADR (June 2021) 29 < https://judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Civil-Justice-Council-Compulsory-ADR-report.pdf> accessed 10 May 2022.+accessed+10+May+2022.>Google Scholar
UK Civil Mediation Council, Guidance Note No 1 ‘Mediation Confidentiality’ (8 July 2009).Google Scholar
UK Civil Mediation Council, Guidance Note No 2, ‘The Obligations of Mediators under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002’.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, ‘Report of Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) on the Work of its Sixty-Seventh Session’ (Vienna, 2–6 October 2017), A/CN.9/929 (11 October 2017).Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, ‘Report of Working Group II (Dispute Settlement) on the Work of its Sixty-Eighth Session (New York, 5–9 February 2018)’, A/CN.9/934 (19 February 2018).Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Settlement of Commercial Disputes: Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Resulting from International Commercial Conciliation/Mediation, A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.187 (27 November 2014).Google Scholar
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Settlement of Commercial Disputes: Enforcement of Settlement Agreements Resulting from International Commercial Conciliation/Mediation: Compilation of Comments by Governments, A/CN.9/846 (27 March 2015).Google Scholar
Ury, W., Brett, J. and Goldberg, S. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Cost of Conflict (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 1988).Google Scholar
Van Ginkel, E. ‘Mediation Under National Law: United States of America’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, August 2005.Google Scholar
Van Ginkel, E. ‘Rojas v Superior Court: The Battle of Two Opposing Public Policies’, IBA Legal Practice Division Mediation Committee Newsletter, April 2005.Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, A. M. ‘An International Mediator Perspective’ in Ingen-Housz, A. (ed), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol 2 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2011), pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
Van Winkle, J. R. Mediation: A Path for the Lost Lawyer (Chicago: American Bar Association 2001).Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, K. ‘Mediation of Cross-Border Commercial Disputes in the European Union’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 182–205.Google Scholar
Wallgren, C. ‘ADR and Business’ in Goldsmith, J. C., Ingen-Housz, A. and Pointon, G. H. (eds), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2006), pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Walsh, N. A. ‘Institutionalisation and Professionalisation’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 487–506.Google Scholar
Wanis-St John, A. ‘Cultural Pathways in Negotiation and Conflict Management’ in Moffitt, M. and Bordone, R. (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2005), pp. 118–34.Google Scholar
Weldon, E. M. and Kelly, P. W. ‘Prelitigation Dispute Resolution Clauses: Getting the Benefit of your Bargain’ (2011) 31(1) Franchise Law Journal 28.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. A. ‘Disputants’ Decision Control in Court-Connected Mediation: A Hollow Promise Without Procedural Justice’ (2002) 1 Journal of Dispute Resolution 179.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. A. ‘Do You Believe in Magic? Self-Determination and Procedural Justice Meets Inequality in Court-Connected Mediation’ (2017) 70(3) SMU Law Review 721.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. A. ‘Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got to Do with It?’ (2001) 79(3) Washington University Law Quarterly 787.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. A. ‘The Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Price of Institutionalization?’ (2001) 6 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. J. ‘The Professionalisation of Everyone’ (1964) 70(2) The American Journal of Sociology 137.Google Scholar
Wiwen-Nilsson, T. ‘Conciliation: Enforcement of Settlements’, Modern Law for Global Commerce: Proceedings of the UNCITRAL Congress, Vienna, 9–12 July 2007.Google Scholar
Wollgast, H. and de Castro, I. ‘WIPO Mediation: Resolving International Intellectual Property and Technology Disputes Outside the Courts’ in Titi, C. and Fach Gómez, K. (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), pp. 259–77.Google Scholar
World Bank Group, Alternative Dispute Resolution Guidelines (Washington DC, 2011).Google Scholar
Zelizer, C. and Chiochetti, C. ‘Mediation Career Trends Through Time, Exploring Opportunities and Challenges’ in Georgakopoulos, A. (ed), The Mediation Handbook: Research, Theory, and Practice (Abingdon, UK: Routledge 2017), pp. 9–19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronán Feehily, Durham University
  • Book: International Commercial Mediation
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869423.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronán Feehily, Durham University
  • Book: International Commercial Mediation
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869423.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronán Feehily, Durham University
  • Book: International Commercial Mediation
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869423.013
Available formats
×