from IV - Domestic and International Capital Markets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
From 1987 through 1993, the number of listed companies and market capitalisation on the Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX) rose from 24 to 174 issuers and from $68 million to $33 billion. Indonesian securities regulation developed in parallel with this growth during the capital market's infancy, but now faces adolescence. This paper seeks to clarify problems of market development, given the sometimes conflicting policies embedded in existing regulations.
Indonesian capital market and privatisation policies followed different paths until relatively recently. However, the pending equity offering of the state-owned telecommunications enterprise PT Indosat (Linnan 1994), to be listed on the JSX and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), has produced a circumstance in which domestic regulation is being subjected to comparison with foreign practice. Dual listing privatisation plans and concurrent offerings abroad by private issuers have the unintended consequence of focusing attention on the question whether, by raising the cost of capital, existing non- market based Indonesian regulation pushes established issuers into foreign capital markets, while disadvantaging smaller issuers and affecting domestic market development adversely. Arguably, globalisation in the form of competition between capital market regulatory structures in Indonesia and elsewhere will improve Indonesian practices in the near to medium term.
Issues for Capital Market Development and Privatisation
Regulatory development in the capital market is complicated by the idea that, alongside ‘best practice’ issues, securities regulation also may be shaped by broader policy considerations. In the Indonesian context, these include the sometimes inconsistent concerns of equity, economic efficiency, economic concentration, and nationalism. This paper takes the position that the result thus far has been potentially to limit development of the capital market.
What is meant by the distinction between ‘market based’ and ‘non-market based’ capital market regulation? For present purposes, ‘market based’ regulation is defined as disclosure-oriented regulation, which assumes that the objective is to support the market's function by establishing a neutral framework for the informed conduct of private parties’ economic relations, while recognising that emerging securities markets are often neither efficient nor liquid.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.