Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:29:40.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

James J. O'Hara
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Inconsistency in Roman Epic
Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan
, pp. 143 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1989) “Homer, Vergil, and Complex Narrative Structures in Latin Epic: An Essay,” ICS 14: 1–31.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1991) Sophocles' Oedipus: Evidence and Self-Conviction. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. and Roisman, H. M. (1996) The Odyssey Re-Formed. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Alter, R. (1981) The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1960) “Discontinuity in Lucretian Symbolism,” TAPA 91: 1–29.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1989) “Lycaon: Ovid's Deceptive Paradigm in Metamorphoses 1,” ICS 14: 91–101.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1993) “Form Changed: Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), Roman Epic, 108–24. London and New York.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1997) Ovid's Metamorphoses, Books 1–5. Norman, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2002) “Vergil's Italy: Ethnography and Politics in First-century Rome,” in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Clio and the Poets, 123–42. Leiden.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1993) “The Addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean Protreptic,” MD 31: 185–230.Google Scholar
Ashline, W. L. (1995) “The Problem of Impossible Fictions,” Style (DeKalb, Ill.) 29: 215–34.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1982) “Lucretius' Venus and Stoic Zeus,” Hermes 110: 458–70.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (ed.) (1947) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1991) “Discordant Muses,” PCPS 37: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” HSCP 95: 333–65; repr. in Barchiesi (2001), 105–27.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1994) Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. Rome; trans. as The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley (1997).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Roberts, D., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, 181–208. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1999) “Venus' Masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 112–26.
Barchiesi, A. (2001) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Translated by M. Fox and S. Marchesi. London.Google Scholar
Barton, C. (1984) “Vis mortua: Irreconcilable Patterns of Thought in the Works of Seneca and Lucan.” Dissertation Berkeley.
Bartsch, S. (1997) Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan's Civil War. Cambridge, Mass.
Bate, J. (1998) The Genius of Shakespeare. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (1993) “Logic, Rhetoric, and Poesis,” Helios 20. 2: 143–72.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (1997) “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics,” in Martindale (1997), 125–44.
Bennett, W. (1993) The Book of Virtues: a Treasury of Great Moral Stories. New York.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, E. (1967) Beobachtungen zur Darstellungsart in Ovids Metamorphosen. Munich.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988) The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (1996) “On Choosing a Spouse: Aeneid 7.378–84 and Callimachus' Epigram 1,” AJP 117. 3: 453–72.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (1998) Review of O'Hara (1996a). AJP 119: 300–3.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (1999) “The Empty Tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the Problem of the Past in Aeneid 6.494–547,” CA 18. 2: 187–226.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (2003) “The Regia of Picus: Ekphrasis, Italian Identity, and Artistic Definition in Aeneid 7.152–93,” in Thibodeau, P. and Haskell, H. (eds.), Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 88–109. Afton, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blusch, J. (1989) “Vielfach und Einheit: Bemerkungen zur Komposition von Catull c. 64,” Antike und Abendland 35: 116–30.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (1980) P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Buch X–Ⅺ.Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bornmann, F. (1968) Callimachus, Hymnus in Dianam. Firenze.Google Scholar
Bragg, R. (2003) I Am a Soldier, Too: The Jessica Lynch Story. New York.Google Scholar
Bramble, J. (1970) “Structure and Ambiguity in Catullus 64,” PCPS 16: 22–41.Google Scholar
Braund, D. (1993) “Writing a Roman Argonautica: the Historical Dynamic,” Hermathena 154: 11–18.Google Scholar
Brown, P. M. (1988) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura I. Bristol.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1987a) Lucretius on Love and Sex. A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287 with prolegomena, text, and transl. Leiden.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1987b) “The Palace of the Sun in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Whitby, M., Hardie, P., Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, 211–20. Bristol.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1955) “P. Vergilius Maro,” RE 8A: 1021–1486.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1979) “Kynaithos, Polycrates, and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo,” in Bowersock, G., Burkert, W., Putnam, M. (eds.), Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, 53–62. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1999) Review of Sedley (1998). BMCR 1999. 10. 29. http:// ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/1999/1999-10-29.html.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Five, Lines 772–1104. Oxford.Google Scholar
Carnes, J. S. (2001) “Degenerate Neoptolemus: Praise Poetry and the Novelization of the Aeneid,” in Peter, I. Barta (ed.), Carnivalizing Difference: Bakhtin and the Other, 99–117. London and New York.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1992) “How Not to Read a Poem: Unmixing Simonides from Protagoras,” CP 87: 11–30.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (1999) “Facta Impia (Virgil, Aeneid 4.596–9),” CQ 49: 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, R. J. (1996) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius of Rhodes: Allusion and Exemplarity,” PCPS 42: 60–88.Google Scholar
Clare, R. J. (2002) The Path of the Argo: Language, Imagery and Narrative in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1994) A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (2002) Vergil's Aeneid. Decorum, Allusion and Ideology. Munich and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. (1983) Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1998) “The Theory of the Literary Persona in Antiquity,” MD 40: 9–40.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1983) The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1989) The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1998) “Venus and Mars (De Rerum Natura 1.31–40),” in Knox, P. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Bd. 92, 3–15. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Colum, P. (1921) The Golden Fleece: And the Heroes Who Lived Before Achilles. New York.Google Scholar
Conington, J. (1963) The Works of Virgil with a Commentary. Rev. by Henry Nettleship. Hildesheim. Reprint of 1883–84 London edition.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1994) “Famous Last Words: Authorship and Death in the Satyricon and Neronian Rome,” in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, & Representation, 225–35. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1991) Generi e Lettori: Lucrezio, L'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan.
Conte, G. B. (1994) “Instructions for a Sublime Reader: Form of the Text and Form of the Addressee in Lucretius' De rerum natura,” chap. 1 in Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: an Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Costa, C. D. N. (1984) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura V. Oxford.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1987) “Quotation, Interpolation, Transposition,” Hermathena 143: 7–18.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1990) “Moral Judgement in Catullus 64,” GB 17: 113–22.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2001) “The Proem of Lucretius,” MH 58. 4: 201–11.Google Scholar
Cramer, R. (1998) Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalzell, A. (1982) “Lucretius,” in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. ii: Latin Literature, 207–29. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, Irene J. F. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, P. H. (1957) “Process and Value: An Epicurean Dilemma,” TAPA 88: 114–26.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. (1999) “Ariadne and the Whirlwind of Fate: Figures of Confusion in Catullus 64.149–57,” CP 94. 4: 419–30.Google Scholar
Depew, M. (1993) “Mimesis and Aetiology in Callimachus' Hymns,” in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 57–77. Groningen.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (1996) Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez: die unechten Verse in Lukrezens “De rerum natura.”Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, M. (1994) “Laying It On with A Trowel: The Proem to Lucan and Related Texts,” CQ 44. 1: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolezel, L. (1998) Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Due, O. (1974) Changing Forms. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. T. (1996) “Septima Aestas: The Puzzle of Aen. 1.755–6 and 5.626,” CW 90. 1: 41–3.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. T. (2001) King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid. Norman, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1984) The Role of the Reader. Bloomington and London.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1997) “Myth in Homer,” in Powell, B. and Morris, I. (eds.), New Companion to Homer, 415–41. Leiden.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.
Edwards, M. J. (1993) “Aeternus lepos: Venus, Lucretius, and the Fear of Death,” G&R 40: 68–78.Google Scholar
Elder, J. P. (1954) “Lucretius 1.1–149,” TAPA 85: 88–120.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. G. (1985) “Ovid and the Critics: Seneca, Quintilian, and ‘Seriousness’,”Helios 12: 9–20.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1997) “Physics and Therapy,” in Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, 79–92. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1957) Recueil de textes latins archaïques. Paris.Google Scholar
Everdell, W. R. (1997) The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought. Chicago and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1992) Lucan: De Bello Civili Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1990) “What Aeneid in Whose Nineties?Vergilius 36: 74–80.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1992) “Dialogue of Genres in Ovid's ‘Lovesong of Polyphemus’ (Metamorphoses 13.719–897),” AJP 113: 235–68.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1994) “The Structure of Lucretius' ‘Anthropology’ (DRN 5.771–1457),” MD 33: 81–95.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1999) “Mea Tempora: Patterning of Time in the Metamorphoses,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 13–30.
Feldherr, A. (1999) “Putting Dido on the Map: Genre and Geography in Vergil's Underworld,” Arethusa 32: 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson-Rubin, N. (1996) “Regarding Penelope,” in Schein, S. L. (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, 163–83. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: a Study of Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989) “Plato and Poetry,” in Kennedy, (1989), 92–148.
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2000) Review of Press, G. A. (ed.), Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity (Lanham, MD 2000). BMCR 2000.11.10. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2000/2000-11-10.html.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. (1990) “Psyche, Aeneas, and an Ass: Apuleius Metamorphoses 6.10–21,” TAPA 120: 333–47.Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. (1980) “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics,” in Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, 21–67. Cambridge, Mass., and London.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995) Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1991) “Unity in Greek Criticism and Poetry,” Arion 1. 3: 125–54.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1988) Review of Ross (1987). G&R 35: 93–5.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1989a) “Lucretius and Politics,” in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, 120–50. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1989b) Review of Thomas (1988). G&R 36: 235–6.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1990) “Deviant Focalisation in Virgil's Aeneid,” PCPS 36: 42–63 = Fowler (2000a), 40–63.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1991) Review of Segal (1990) and A. Schiesaro, Simulacrum et imago: gli argomenti analogici nel De Rerum Natura (Pisa 1990). G&R 39: 237–9.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1993) “Response to P. R. Hardie ‘Tales of Unity and Division in Latin Epic’,” in Molyneux, J. (ed.), Literary Responses to Civil Discord, 73–6. Nottingham.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1995) “From Epos to Cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the Poetics of Segmentation,” in D. C. Innes, H. Hine, and C. Pelling (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his 75th Birthday, 1–18. Oxford.
Fowler, D. P. (2000a) Roman Constructions. Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000b) “Philosophy and Literature in Lucretian Intertextuality,” in Fowler (2000a), 138–55.
Fowler, D. P. (2000c) “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies,” in Fowler (2000a), 115–37 = MD 39 (1997), 13–34.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (1993) The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Friedlander, P. (1939) “The Epicurean Theology of Lucretius' First Proem (Lucr. 1.44–49),” TAPA 70: 368–79.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting Paradigms: New Approaches to Horace's Ars poetica. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1966) “Lucretius and the Stoics,” BICS 13: 13–33.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. (1985) Il tempo delle argonautiche: un'analisi del racconto in Apollonio Rodio. Rome.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1995) “Threads in the Labyrinth: Competing Views and Voices in Catullus 64,” AJP 116: 579–616.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (1994a) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (1994b) “Lucretius 4.1–25 and the Proems of the De Rerum Natura,” PCPS 40: 1–17.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things. The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (1975) Ovid's Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (1999) “Ovid's Poetology in the Metamorphoses,” in Ovid. Werk und Wirkung. Festgabe für Michael von Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag, 305–14. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: a Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia ii,” JRS 89: 19–37.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, K. (n.d.), “Paradox in the Mythological Chronology of Apollonius Rhodius.” Unpublished manuscript.
Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2000) “Inspirational Fictions: Autobiography and Generic Reflexivity in Ovid's Proems,” G&R 47: 67–79.Google Scholar
Givens, B. (1996) Roman Soldiers Don't Wear Watches: 501 Film Flubs – Memorable Movie Mistakes. Secaucus, NJ.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (1995) Catullus, Poems 61–68. Warminster.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1986) “Framing and Polyphony: Readings in Hellenistic Poetry,” PCPS 32: 25–52.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1985) “Eneide: La Lingua,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana 2: 262–78. Rome.Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. (1984) “The Transformation of Mezentius,” TAPA 114: 191–218.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1999) Review of Deufert (1996). Mnem. ser. 4 vol. 52: 748–55.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. (1942) “The Twenty-Second Idyll of Theocritus,” CR 56: 11–18.
Gow, A. S. F. (1950) Theocritus: Edited with a Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.
Granobs, R. (1997) Studien zur Darstellung römischer Geschichte in Ovids “Metamorphosen.”Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Gransden, K. W. (1991) Virgil: Aeneid Book Ⅺ. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Green, P. M. (1997) The Argonautika by Apollonios Rhodios. Translated, with introduction, commentary, and glossary. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. H. F. (1989) “Virgil's Unfinished Aeneid,” Pegasus 32: 3–10.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (1990) “Contest and Contradiction in Early Greek Poetry,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays in Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, 185–205. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Griffiths, F. T. (1980) “The Structure and Style of the ‘Short Epics’ of Catullus and Virgil,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 2: Collection Latomus 168: 123–37.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. (1996) überlegungen zur Entstehung von Vergils Aeneis. Hypomnemata Heft 113. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halleran, M. R. (1997) “It's Not What You Say: Unspoken Allusions in Greek Tragedy?MD 39: 151–63.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1987) Aristotle's Poetics. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1989) “Aristotle's Poetics,” in Kennedy, (1989), 149–83.
Halliwell, S. (1991) Review of Heath (1989). JHS 111: 230–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, D. (1992) “Plato and the Erotics of Narrativity,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 95–126.
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1988) “Lucretius and the Delusions of Narcissus,” MD 20–1: 71–89.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1990) “Ovid's Theban History: The First ‘Anti-Aeneid’?,” CQ 40: 224–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1991) “The Janus Episode in Ovid's Fasti,” MD 26: 47–64.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1992) “Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, 59–82. London.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1994) Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1995) “The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid, Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos,” CQ 45: 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1996) “Virgil: A Paradoxical Poet?PLLS 9: 103–21.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1997a) “Closure in Latin Epic,” in Roberts, D., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, 139–62. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1997b) “Questions of Authority: the Invention of Tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses, 15,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution, 182–98. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil. Greece & Rome. New Surveys in the Classics, no. 28. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1999) Review of Günther (1996). CR 49.1:49–50.
Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.) (1999) Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge Philological Society Suppl. Vol. 23. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison,, S. J. (ed.) (1990) Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison,, S. J. (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. and Heyworth, S. J. (1998) “Notes on the Text and Interpretation of Catullus,” PCPS 44: 85–109.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. (1993) “Callimachus' Hymns,” in Harder, M. A. et al. (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 111–25. Groningen.Google Scholar
Haupt, M. (1966) P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen. Revised by R. Ewald and M. von Albrecht. Zürich and Dublin.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1989) Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (1989) Tragic Rhetoric: An Interpretation of Sophocles' “Trachiniae.” Bern, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Paris.Google Scholar
Helzle, M. (1993) “Ovid's Cosmogony: Metamorphoses 1.5–88 and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry,” PLLS 7: 123–34.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. W. (1998) “Lucan: The Word at War,” in Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War, 165–211. New York and Cambridge. Revised from Ramus 16 (1987), 122–64.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. (1989–90) “What Was the Trojan Horse Made Of?: Interpreting Vergil's Aeneid,” YJC 3: 109–31.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. (1992) “Sidonian Dido,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 332–84.
Hexter, R. (1994) “Commentary, Reading, Writing,” One Hundred Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association: Abstract (Worcester, MA), 278.
Heyworth, S. (1994) “Some Allusions to Callimachus in Latin Poetry,” MD 33: 51–79.Google Scholar
Hill, D. E. (1999) Ovid, Metamorphoses IX–Ⅻ. Warminster.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1985) “Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1,” PCPS 211, n.s. 31: 13–32.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1987b) “Generalising About Ovid,” Ramus 16: 4–31.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1992) “Arma in Ovid's Fasti: Part 2: Genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan Ideology,” Arethusa 25: 113–53.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” MD 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1999) “After Exile: Time and Teleology from Metamorphoses to Ibis,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 48–67.
Hofmann, J. B. (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Revised by A. Szantyr. 3rd edn. Munich.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1970) Ovid: Metamorphoses, Book VIII. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1990) Callimachus: Hecale. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (1984) “Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” CQ 34: 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1971) “Numanus Remulus, Ethnography and Propaganda in Aen. ix, 598f,” Latomus 30: 1108–16.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1981) “Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos,” Antichthon 15:141–50 = Harrison (1990), 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1987) “Numano Remulo,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana Vol. iii: 778–9. Rome.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1991a) Virgilio: l'epopea in alambicco. Naples.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1991b) “Virgil, Parthenius, and the Art of Mythological Reference,” Vergilius 37: 31–6.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1995) A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1997) Review of Günther (1996). RFIC 125: 468–72.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Mnemosyne Suppl. 198. Leiden.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (2006) Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (1987) “Medea's Flight: the Fourth Book of the Argonautica,” CQ 37: 129–39.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1991) “‘Breast is Best’: Catullus 64.18,” CQ n.s. 41: 254–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. New York and Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. (1996) Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. New York and Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) “The Date of De Rerum Natura,” CQ 51: 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. (1997) “Argo: the First Ship?,” RhM 140: 249–57.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Janan, M. (1988) “The Book of Good Love. Design versus Desire in Metamorphoses 10,” Ramus 17: 110–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janan, M. (1994) “When the Lamp is Shattered:” Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale, Ill.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1998) “The Homeric Poems as Oral Dictated Texts,” CQ 48: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus. On Poems: Book 1. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. (1982) “Catullus and the Idea of a Masterpiece,” in Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal, 85–150. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1987) Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (2000) Lucretius and the Modern World. London.Google Scholar
Katz, M. A. (1991) Penelope's Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the “Odyssey.”Princeton.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1999) “Versions of Epic Masculinity in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999), 214–39.
Keith, A. M. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.
Kennedy, G. (ed.) (1989) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism.Vol. i. Classical Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1976) “Ovidius Prooemians,” PCPS 22: 46–53.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1978) Review of F. Bömer, P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Buch IV–V. CR n.s. 28: 251–3.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1980) “Psyche and her Mysterious Husband,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, 175–98. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1986) Introduction and Notes to Ovid, Metamorphoses, trans. A. D. Melville. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kepple, L. (1980) “The Textual and Thematic Contexts of Lucan's ‘Praise of Nero’ in the Bellum Civile.” Dissertation Harvard.
Kepple, L. (1981) Summary of Kepple (1980). HCSP 85: 383–5.Google Scholar
Kinsey, T. E. (1965) “Irony and Structure in Catullus 64,” Latomus 24: 911–31.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1966) “Lukrez und Venus (De Rerum Natura 1.1–49),” SO 41: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingner, F. (1964) “Catulls Peleus-Epos,” in Studien zur Griechischen und Römischen Literatur, 156–224. Zurich.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1986) Ovid's Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1977) Catullus' Indictment of Rome. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. (1987) “Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.2,” CQ 37: 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafaye, G. (1904) Les métamorphoses d'Ovide et leurs modèles grecs. Paris; Repr. Hildesheim, 1971.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1991) Review of Heath (1989). Ancient Philosophy 11: 465–73.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J. (1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea, Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674), Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–51),” ICS 15: 131–41.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. (1992) “Theocritus' Hymn to the Dioscuri. Unity and Intention,” C&M 43: 71–92.Google Scholar
Leach, E. (1974) “Ekphrasis and the Theme of Artistic Failure in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” Ramus 3: 102–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. (1988) The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lee, A. G. (1953) Ovid: Metamorphoses Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Little, D. (1970) “The Speech of Pythagoras in Metamorphosesxv and the Structure of the Metamorphoses,” Hermes 98: 340–60.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1972) “Tycho von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff on the Dramatic Technique of Sophocles,” CQ 22: 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1997) “Lucretius on Nature and the Epicurean Self,” in Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, 125–39. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lord, A. B. (1960) The Singer of Tales. New York.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1993) Review of Freudenburg (1993). BMCR 4.3.5. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1993/04.03.05.html.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. (1968) Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lüddecke, K. (1998) “Contextualizing the Voice in Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” MD 41: 9–33.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1978) Ciris: A Poem Attributed to Vergil. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1983) “Vergil and the Politics of War,” CQ 33: 188–203 = Harrison (1990), 316–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil's “Aeneid.”Oxford.Google Scholar
Mack, S. (1978) Patterns of Time in Vergil. Hamden, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Mack, S. (1988) Ovid. New Haven.Google Scholar
Mackie, C. J. (1988) The Characterisation of Aeneas. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mackie, C. J. (1991) “Nox erat …: Sleep and Visions in the Aeneid,” G&R 38: 59–61.Google Scholar
, R. (2002) Tibullus: Elegies: Text, Introduction and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993a) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993b) “Descent into Hell: Reading Ambiguity, or Virgil and the Critics,” PVS 21: 111–50.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste: an Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Masters, J. M. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's “Bellum Civile.”Cambridge.Google Scholar
Masters, J. M. (1994) “Deceiving the Reader: the Political Mission of Lucan Bellum Civile 7,” in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation, 151–77. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
May, C. (1995) “A Postmodern Challenge to Reference-World Construction: Gilbert Sorrentino's Mulligan Stew,” Style (DeKalb, Ill.) 29: 235–61.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. (1988) “Aeneid 8.573 and Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” CQ 38: 260–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. G. (2003) “Persona Problems. The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited,” MD 50: 55–80.Google Scholar
McHale, B. (1987) Postmodernist Fiction. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKim, R. (1985) “Myth Against Philosophy in Ovid's Account of Creation,” CJ 80: 97–108.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. (1980) Virgil's “Georgics:” A New Interpretation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar
Miller, A. M. (1986) From Delos to Delphi: a Literary Study of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo. Leiden.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1991) Ovid's Elegiac Festivals: Studies in the “Fasti.”Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1992) “The Fasti and Hellenistic Didactic: Ovid's Variant Aetiologies,” Arethusa 25: 11–31.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1994) Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: the Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London and New York.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic. Mnemosyne Supplement 90. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1993) “Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura,” MD 31: 111–28.Google Scholar
Molviati-Toptsis, U. (1995) “Sed Falsa ad Caelum Mittunt Insomnia Manes (Aeneid 6.896),” AJP 116: 639–52.Google Scholar
Moorton, R. (1989) “The Innocence of Italy in Vergil's Aeneid,” AJP 110: 105–30.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. (1992) Homeric Misdirection: False Predictions in the “Iliad.”Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Morwood, J. (1999) “Catullus 64, Medea, and the François Vase,” G&R 46: 221–31.Google Scholar
Müller, G. A. (2003) Formen und Funktionen der Vergilzitate und -anspielungen bei Augustin von Hippo. Paderborn.
Murgia, C. (1987) “Dido's Puns,” CP 82: 50–9.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. (2003) “The Date of the Helen Episode,” HSCP 101: 405–26.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1997) Plato on Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the “Metamorphoses.”Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil: Georgics: Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. (1990) “Ethical Anxiety and Artistic Inconsistency: The Case of Oral Epic,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays in Classical and Comparative literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, 225–39. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1992) “Mythological Exemplum in Homer,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 311–31.
Nagy, G. (1996) Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (1999) “Deconstructing Lucan, ovvero Le nozze (coi fichi secchi) di Ermete Trismegisto e di Filologia,” in Nicastri, L. and Esposito, P. (eds.), Interpretare Lucano. Miscellanea di studi, 37–81. Naples = Maia 51 (1999), 349–87.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2001) Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. (1995) Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss, J. and Johnston, S. (eds.), Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, 178–208. Princeton.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1990) Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Nishimura-Jensen, J. (2000) “Unstable Geographies: The Moving Landscape in Apollonius' Argonautica and Callimachus' Hymn to Delos,” TAPA 130: 287–317.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1981) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. 7th edn. Stuttgart. Only light corrections from 2nd edn. of 1916.Google Scholar
Norwood, F. (1954) “The Tripartite Eschatology of Aeneid 6,” CP 49:15–26.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1992) “Vergil's Voice of the Women in Aeneidv,” Arethusa 25: 255–92.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2003) “The Homeric Scholia on Focalization,” Mnemosyne 56. 1: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connell, O' M. (1977) “Pictorialism and Meaning in Catullus 64,” Latomus 36: 746–56.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's “Aeneid.”Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1993a) “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ in Aeneid 4.56–66,” Arethusa 26: 99–114.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1993b) Review of Feeney (1991). Vergilius 39: 87–96.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1994) “They Might Be Giants: Inconsistency and Indeterminacy in Vergil's War in Italy,” in H. Roisman and J. Roisman (eds.), Studies in Roman Epic, Colby Quarterly 30: 206–26.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1995) Review of Hardie (1994). BMCR 95.07.11. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1995/95.07.11.html.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1996a) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1996b) “An Unconvincing Argument about Aeneas and the Gates of Sleep,” Phoenix 50: 331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1996c) “Vergil's Best Reader? Ovidian Commentary on Vergilian Etymological Wordplay,” CJ 91: 255–76.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1996d) Review of Ahl and Roisman (1996). BMCR 95.07.11. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1996/96.11.08.html.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (1997) “Virgil's Style,” in Martindale (1997), 241–58.
O'Hara, J. (1999) Review of Leigh (1997). CJ 94.2: 200–3.
O'Hara, J. (2001) “Callimachean Influence on Vergilian Etymological Wordplay,” CJ 96: 369–400.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (2005a) “‘Some God … or his Own Heart:’ Two Kinds of Epic Motivation in the Proem to Ovid's Metamorphoses,” CJ 100. 2: 149–61.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. (2005b) “Trying not to Cheat: Responses to Inconsistencies in Roman Epic,” TAPA 135: 15–33.Google Scholar
Obbink, , D. (ed.) (1995) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus on Piety: Critical Text with Commentary Part 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1970) A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. D. (1991) Review of Katz (1991). BMCR 02.06.13. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1991/02.06.13.html.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1970) Ovid as an Epic Poet. Cambridge, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1984) Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons: Literary Authority in American Fiction. Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
Parry, A. (1966) “The Two Voices of Vergil's Aeneid,” in Commager, S. (ed.), Virgil: A Collection of Critical Essays, 107–23. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1920) “Il carme 64 di Catullo,” SIFC 1: 1–23.Google Scholar
Patin, M. (1868) “L'Anti-Lucrèce chez Lucrèce,” in Études sur la poésie latine I, 117–37. Paris.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1989) The Poet's Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil's “Georgics.”Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1992) Review of Farrell (1991). CP 87: 269–74.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1994) “Ambiguity and Irony: the Last Resort?,” Helios 21: 63–74.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1997) “The Lament of Juturna: Pathos and Interpretation in the Aeneid,” TAPA 127: 257–86.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (2002) “The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil,” Vergilius 48: 3–39.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. (1970) Catullus: The Poems. London.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. (1993) Anxiety Veiled: Euripides and the Traffic in Women. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Reckford, K. J. (1981) “Helen in Aeneid 2 and 6,” Arethusa 14: 85–99.Google Scholar
Reckford, K. J. (1995) “Recognizing Venus i: Aeneas Meets his Mother,” Arion 3. 2–3: 1–42.Google Scholar
Rhorer, C. C. (1980) “Ideology, Tripartition and Ovid's Metamorphoses (1.5–451),” Arethusa 13: 299–313.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1970) Poetries and Sciences; a Reissue of Science and Poetry (1926, 1935) with Commentary. New York.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2002) “Narrative Techniques and Narrative Structures in the Metamorphoses,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 271–304. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) “Her Master's Voice: Sappho's Dialogue with Homer,” MD 39: 123–49.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. Jr. (1975) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. Jr. (1987) Virgil's Elements: Physics and Poetry in the “Georgics.”Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudich, V. (1997) Dissidence and Literature under Nero: The Price of Rhetoricization. New York.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1992) “Unity and Variety in Ancient Criticism, Some Observations on a Recent Study,” Mnemosyne 45: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. (2001) “The Meaning of Vergil's Aeneid: American and German Approaches,” CW 94: 145–71.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. (1990) Zeitgeschichte in Ovids Metamorphosen: Mythologische Dichtung unter politischem Anspruch. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. (1977) “Apollo's Perfidy: Iliadv 59–63,” HSCP 81: 55–7.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1986) “Literary Interpretation in Plato's Protagoras,” AncPhil 6: 25–37.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1997) “Pseudo-Intimacy and the Prior Knowledge of the Homeric Audience,” Arethusa 30. 2: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. (1998) “The Removal of the Arms, the Recognition with Laertes, and Narrative Tension in the Odyssey,” CP 93. 1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1999) Credible Impossibilities: Conventions and Strategies of Verisimilitude in Homer and Greek Tragedy. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. (1969) “Myth and Philosophy in the Metamorphoses: Ovid's Augustanism and the Augustan Conclusion of Book xv,” AJP 90: 257–92.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1990) Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. (1999) “Ovid's Meleager and the Greeks: Trials of Gender and Genre,” HSCP 99: 301–40.Google Scholar
Selden, D. L. (1992) “Caveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 461–512.
Selden, D. L. (1998) “Alibis,” CA 17. 2: 290–419.Google Scholar
Selden, D. L. and Hexter, R. (eds.) (1992) Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (1992) “Theocritus, Homer, and the Dioscuri: Idyll 22.137–223,” TAPA 122: 335–50.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (1997) Theocritus, Dioscuri (Idyll 22): Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Göttingen.
Sharrock, A. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2000) “Intratextuality: Texts, Parts, and (W)holes in Theory,” in Sharrock, and Morales, H. (eds.), Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations, 1–39. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shumate, N. (1996) Crisis and Conversion in Apuleius' Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. (1989) “Ut decuit cinaediorem: Power, Gender, and Urbanity in Catullus 10,” Helios 16: 7–23.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (1994) “Remembrance of a Guest: Theseus in Callimachus' Hecale and Catullus 64,” LCM 19: 147–8.Google Scholar
Sklenár, R. (2003) The Taste for Nothingness. A Study of “Virtus” and Related Themes in Lucan's “Bellum civile.”Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. F. (ed.) (1982) Lucretius. De rerum natura. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1972) “The World of the Dead in Book 6 of the Aeneid,” CP 67: 31–41 = Harrison (1990), 208–23.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. (1988) The World of Ovid's “Metamorphoses.”Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Squillante Saccone, M. (1987) “Discordanze,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana Vol. II: 95–7. Roma.Google Scholar
Stern, J. (1978) “Theocritus' Epithalamium of Helen,” RBPh 56: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, M. (1985) The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Summers, K. (1995) “Lucretius and the Epicurean Tradition of Piety,” CP 90. 1: 32–57.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. (1996) Is Heathcliff a Murderer? Great Puzzles in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. (1997) Can Jane Eyre Be Happy? More Puzzles in Classic Fiction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. (1998) Where was Rebecca Shot? Curiosities, Puzzles, and Conundrums in Modern Fiction. London.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. (1989) Metamorphoses of Helen. Authority, Difference and the Epic. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (1984) Catull: eine Interpretation. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1982) “Review Article. Editing Ovid's Metamorphoses: Problems and Possibilities,” CP 77: 342–60.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1995) “The Silence of Cephalus: Text and Narrative Technique in Ovid, Metamorphoses 7.685ff.,” TAPA 125: 99–111.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (1995) “The Green Berets: Film in Context,” History Today 45. 3: 21–5.Google Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (2000) “Catullus 64: Footprints in the Labyrinth,” in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.), Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations, 115–41. Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982a) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982b) “Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference,” AJP 103: 144–54 = Thomas (1999), 12–32.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1985) “From Recusatio to Commitment: The Evolution of the Vergilian Programme,” PLLS 5: 61–73 = Thomas (1999), 101–13.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil: Georgics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1990) “Ideology, Influence, and Future Studies in the Georgics,” Vergilius 36: 64–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1993) “Callimachus back in Rome,” in M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, G. C. Wakker (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 197–215. Groningen = Thomas (1999), 206–28.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1996) “Genre Through Intertextuality: Theocritus to Virgil and Propertius” in M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker (eds.), Theocritus: Hellenistica Groningana II, 227–44. Groningen = Thomas (1999), 246–66.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1998) “The Isolation of Turnus. Aeneid Book 12,” in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.), Vergil's “Aeneid:” Augustan Epic and Political Context, 271–302. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2004) “‘Drownded in the Tide:’ The Nauagika and Some ‘Problems’ in Augustan Poetry,” in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309), 259–75. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2004–5) “Torn between Jupiter and Saturn: Ideology, Rhetoric and Culture Wars in the Aeneid,” CJ 100. 2: 121–47.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1997) Catullus. Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1976) The Freudian Slip: Psychoanalysis and Textual Criticism. London.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. (2002) “The House of Fame: Roman History and Augustan Politics in Metamorphoses 1–15,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 305–35. Leiden.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1977) The Poetics of Prose, trans. R. Howard. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Toll, K. (1997) “Making Roman-ness and the Aeneid,” CA 16. 1: 34–56.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1983) “The Unstated Climax of Catullus 64,” G&R 30: 21–30.Google Scholar
Traube, E. G. (1992) Dreaming Identities: Class, Gender, and Generation in 1980s Hollywood Movies. Boulder, Col.Google Scholar
Tsagarakis, O. (1979) “Oral Composition, Type-scenes, and Narrative Inconsistencies in Homer,” GB 8: 23–48.Google Scholar
Uhrmeister, V. and Bing, P. (1994) “The Unity of Callimachus' Hymn to Artemis,” JHS 114: 19–34.Google Scholar
Nortwick, T. (1980) “Aeneas, Turnus, and Achilles,” TAPA 110: 303–14.Google Scholar
Sickle, J. (1987) “The Elogia of the Cornelii Scipiones and the Origins of Epigram at Rome,” AJP 108: 41–55.Google Scholar
Waldock, A. J. A. (1966) Sophocles the Dramatist. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1969) “The Diction of Death in Latin Epic,” Agon 3: 45–68.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1983) “Two Chronological Contradictions in Catullus,” TAPA 113: 263–71.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1995a) “Imago mundi: Another View of the Creation in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” AJP 116: 95–121.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1995b) “Ovid's use of Lucretius in Metamorphoses 1.67–8,” CQ 45: 200–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1995c) Review of Myers (1994). BMCR 95.03.31. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1995/95.03.31.html.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (2002) “Lucan's Reception of Ovid's Metamorphoses,” Arethusa 35: 361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (1993) Promised Verse. Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (2002) “Ovid and the Augustan Milieu,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 1–25. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1982) Virgil: The Georgics. New York.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1968) Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. (1978) Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.
Williams, G. W. (1983) Technique and Ideas in the “Aeneid.”New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Williams, R. D. (1973) The Aeneid of Virgil: Books 7–12. London.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. B. (2000) Sense and Nonsense in Homer: a Consideration of the Inconsistencies and Incoherences in the Texts of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. (1985) Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius's “The Golden Ass.”Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1974) Cinna the Poet, and Other Roman Essays. Leicester.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1999) “Petronius as Paradox: Anarchy and Artistic Integrity,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Oxford Readings in the Roman Novel, 1–49. Oxford = TAPA 102 (1971), 631–84.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) “Horace's Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–77.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983) “Catullus, Ennius, and the Poetics of Allusion,” ICS 8: 251–66.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1989) “ROMANE, MEMENTO: Justice and Judgement in Aeneid 6,” TAPA 119: 263–84.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1997) “Rome and Its Traditions,” in Martindale (1997), 188–203.
Zissos, A. (1999) “Allusion and Narrative Possibility in the Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus,” CP 94: 289–301.Google Scholar
Zissos, A. and I. Gildenhard (1999) “Problems of Time in Metamorphoses 2,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 31–47.
Zwierlein, O. (1999) Die Ovid- und Vergil-Revision in tiberischer Zeit. Band I: Prolegomena. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • James J. O'Hara, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Inconsistency in Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618567.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • James J. O'Hara, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Inconsistency in Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618567.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • James J. O'Hara, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: Inconsistency in Roman Epic
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618567.008
Available formats
×