Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:44:39.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Human biological materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

David Price
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Leicester
Get access

Summary

This chapter is concerned with the language and concepts applied to ‘human biological materials’ for transplantation and research within the practice and policy arena, and the ambit(s) of legal regulation. The language and dialogue historically employed in this sphere has often hindered rather than assisted adequate and clear communication between professionals and lay persons. This can be seen in the repeated misapprehension attaching to the use of the term ‘tissue’ in the context of post-mortem examination and retention for research, revealed in the recent inquiry reports in the UK (‘tissue’ typically being taken by families to exclude whole organs or brains, yet having a broad generic meaning for clinicians and pathologists). Moreover, there is a need to be sensitive to the inappropriate or irreverent use of language applied to activities relating to human body parts, which might even negatively impact on rates of donation, e.g. ‘harvesting’, ‘products’, ‘cadavers’, etc. Even the expression ‘human material’ proved controversial to some consultees during the lead-up to the Human Tissue Bill being presented to Parliament, on account of the ‘objectification’ allegedly implied by the expression.

A legislative framework governing the (removal and) use of human material for medical purposes generally is currently to be found in some jurisdictions. There is, for instance, a comprehensive framework governing the use of human material for research, transplantation and other medical purposes across most of the UK, replacing the patchwork of legislative provisions previously applying to different spheres. Quite apart from the need for explicit legal authority to take, hold, or use the material itself, especially as regards deceased persons, there are concerns that need to be addressed relating to the safety and quality of material, potential limitations on use and commerciality, suitability of the personnel and premises connected with the material, etc.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Tissue in Transplantation and Research
A Model Legal and Ethical Donation Framework
, pp. 26 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parry, B., ‘The new Human Tissue Bill: Categorization and definitional issues and their implications’ (2005) 1(1) Genomics, Society and PolicyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health, Summary of Responses to the Consultation Report Human Bodies, Human Choices, Department of Health, London, 2003Google Scholar
Price, D. and Mackay, R., ‘The trade in human organs’ (1991) 141 New Law Journal1307Google Scholar
Fortin, J., Children’s Rights and Developing Law, 3rd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, J. and Zoon, K., ‘The View from the Food and Drug Administration’, in Youngner, S., Anderson, M. and Schapiro, R. (eds.), Transplanting Human Tissue: Ethics, Policy, and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2004) 71.Google Scholar
Womack, C. and Gray, N., ‘Human research tissue banks in the UK National Health Service: Law, ethics, controls and constraints’ (2000) 55 British Journal of Biomedical Sciences250Google Scholar
Ball, S. and Bell, S., Environmental Law, 4th edn. (London: Blackstone Press, 1997), p. 382.Google Scholar
Ellis, I., ‘Justice versus utility in the ethics of research on: “human genetic material”’ (2001) 1(5) Genetics Law Monitor 1 at 2.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., ‘Tissue collection and the pharmaceutical industry’, in Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (eds.), Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA (Oxford: Routledge, 2004) 181 at 184.Google Scholar
Barton, J., ‘The Biodiversity Convention and the flow of scientific information’, in Hoagland, K. and Rossman, A. (eds.), Global Genetic Resources: Access, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Rights (Washington, DC: Association of Systematics Research Publishers, 1997), p. 55Google Scholar
Gevers, S. and Olsthoorn-Heim, E., ‘DNA sampling: Dutch and European approaches to the issues of informed consent and confidentiality’, in Knoppers, B. (ed.), Human DNA: Law and Policy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 1997) 109 at 118.Google Scholar
Jones, D., Speaking for the Dead: Cadavers in Biology and Medicine (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000), p. 77.Google Scholar
Parry, B., Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-Information (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004), p. 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, J., ‘Regulating genetic databases: Some legal and ethical issues’ (2004) 12(1) Medical Law Review70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. and McGibbons, S., ‘Mapping the regulatory space for genetic databases and biobanks in England and Wales’ (2008) 9 Medical Law International111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpert, S., ‘Privacy and the analysis of stored tissues’, in Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockville, MD, 2000 at 15–16.Google Scholar
German National Ethics Council Opinion, Biobanks for Research, Berlin, 2004 at 46.Google Scholar
Laurie, G., Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 301–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gere, C. and Parry, B., ‘The flesh made word: Banking the body in the age of information’ (2006) 1 Biosocieties41 [Gere and Parry, ‘The flesh made word’].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyasaka, M., ‘Resourcifying human bodies – Kant and bioethics’ (2005) 8 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 at 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, C., ‘Selling bits and pieces of humans to make babies: The Gift of the Magi revisited’ (1999) 24(3) Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 288 at 291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, C., ‘Body, self, and the property paradigm’ (1992) 22(5) Hastings Center Report 34 at 36.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillett, G., ‘Ethics and images in organ transplantation’, in Trzepacz, P. and Dimatini, A. (eds.), The Transplant Patient: Biological, Psychiatric and Ethical Issues in Organ Transplantation (Cambridge University Press, 2000) 239 at 239.Google Scholar
Friedman, A., ‘Payment for living organ donation should be legalised’ (2006) 333 British Medical Journal 746 at 747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kant, I., Lectures on Ethics, trans. Infield, Louis (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), pp. 147–8.Google Scholar
Cherry, M., Kidney for Sale by Owner: Human Organs, Transplantation, and the Market (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005), p. 26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Human biological materials
  • David Price, De Montfort University, Leicester
  • Book: Human Tissue in Transplantation and Research
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139195652.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Human biological materials
  • David Price, De Montfort University, Leicester
  • Book: Human Tissue in Transplantation and Research
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139195652.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Human biological materials
  • David Price, De Montfort University, Leicester
  • Book: Human Tissue in Transplantation and Research
  • Online publication: 05 July 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139195652.005
Available formats
×