Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Basic rules of writing
- 2 Comments on scientific language
- 3 Drafting the manuscript
- 4 Choosing a journal
- 5 Preparing a graph
- 6 Drawings
- 7 Figure legends
- 8 How to design tables
- 9 Title
- 10 Authors
- 11 Abstract
- 12 Introduction
- 13 Methods
- 14 Results
- 15 Discussion
- 16 Acknowledgments
- 17 References
- 18 Ph.D. and other doctoral theses
- 19 Letters and case reports
- 20 Numbers
- 21 Abbreviations
- 22 How to present statistical results
- 23 Typing
- 24 Dealing with editors and referees
- 25 Correcting proofs
- 26 Authors‘ responsibilities
- Literature needed on your desk
- Further reading
- Literature cited
- Index
17 - References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Basic rules of writing
- 2 Comments on scientific language
- 3 Drafting the manuscript
- 4 Choosing a journal
- 5 Preparing a graph
- 6 Drawings
- 7 Figure legends
- 8 How to design tables
- 9 Title
- 10 Authors
- 11 Abstract
- 12 Introduction
- 13 Methods
- 14 Results
- 15 Discussion
- 16 Acknowledgments
- 17 References
- 18 Ph.D. and other doctoral theses
- 19 Letters and case reports
- 20 Numbers
- 21 Abbreviations
- 22 How to present statistical results
- 23 Typing
- 24 Dealing with editors and referees
- 25 Correcting proofs
- 26 Authors‘ responsibilities
- Literature needed on your desk
- Further reading
- Literature cited
- Index
Summary
At one time, there were over 250 different styles of reference in the scientific literature (Garfield 1986). The editors of some major biomedical journals therefore had good reason to convene in Vancouver, Canada, in January 1978, to work out a uniform reference style. One of their suggestions was that authors should number references in the order in which they appear in the text (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 1997).
Vancouver versus Harvard style?
Although many of the major journals in the biomedical field have adopted the Vancouver style, some still prefer the Harvard system (first used in 1881 by a zoologist at Harvard University [Chernin 1988]) in which the author's name and the year of publication are cited in the text. In the fictive sentence below, I have mixed the two styles to illustrate their differences:
A reference figure (17) in the Vancouver style says less than a name-and-year reference (Einstein 1941) according to the Harvard system.
Most readers prefer the Harvard system because they like to know just what author is being cited as they read the text. Still, the name-and-year system does have disadvantages: difficulty for readers who see an interesting item in the reference list in locating that reference in the main text; and, more important, the disruption of the text when a large number of references need to be cited within a paragraph, as in this example (Bengtsson 1968):
This method was introduced by Aburel in 1938, but he was followed by only a few workers in the succeeding 20 years (Bommelaer 1948; Cioc 1948; Kosowski 1949; de Watteville and d'Enst 1950).[…]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper , pp. 81 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008