Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Department of Health. Maternity Matters: Choice, Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service. London: Department of Health, 2007.Google Scholar

Expert Maternity Group. Woman centred care. In Department of Health. Changing Childbirth. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar

Lau, TK. Prenatal fetal surveillance. In James, D, Steer, PJ, Weiner, CP, Gonik, B (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options, 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2011, pp. 163–72.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar

Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 182–92.Google Scholar

Pay, AS, Wiik, J, Backe, B, et al. Symphysis–fundus height measurement to predict small-for-gestational-age status at birth: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 22.Google Scholar

Persson, B, Stangenberg, M, Lunell, NO, et al. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 206–11.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neilson, JP. Symphysis–fundal height measurement in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000944.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Francis, A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 309–17.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schmidt, W, Cseh, I, Hara, K, Kubli, F. Maternal perception of fetal movements and real-time ultrasound findings. J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 313–18.Google Scholar

Tuffnell, DJ, Cartmill, RS, Lilford, RJ. Fetal movements: factors affecting their perception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39: 165–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Smith, CV, Davis, SA, Rayburn, WF. Patients’ acceptance of monitoring fetal movement: a randomized comparison of charting techniques. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 144–6.Google Scholar

Mangesi, L, Hofmeyr, GJ, Smith, V, Smyth, RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10): CD004909.Google Scholar

Melendez, TD1, Rayburn, WF, Smith, CV. Characterization of fetal body movement recorded by the Hewlett-Packard M-1350-A fetal monitor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 700–2.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reduced Fetal Movements. Green-top Guideline No. 57. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_57.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Saastad, E, Tveit, JV, Flenady, V, et al. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women: a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 2.Google Scholar

Heazell, AE, Bernatavicius, G, Roberts, SA, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation–a feasibility study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 95.Google Scholar

AFFIRM. Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focussing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. http://www.crh.ed.ac.uk/affirm (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Beattie, RB, Dornan, JC. Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. BMJ 1989; 298: 631–5.Google Scholar PubMed

Nelson, TR, Pretorius, DH. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 439–47.Google Scholar

Giles, W, Bisits, A, O’Callaghan, S, Gil, A; DAMP Study Group. The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy. BJOG 2003; 110: 593–7.Google Scholar

Eik-Nes, SH, Brubaak, AO, Ulstein, MK. Measurement of human fetal blood flow. BMJ 1980; 280: 283–4.Google Scholar

Mires, GJ, Patel, NB, Dempster, J. The value of fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in the prediction of adverse fetal outcome in high-risk pregnancies. J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 10: 261–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burns, PN. Principles of Doppler and color flow. Radiology in Medicine 1993; 85 (5 Suppl 1): 3–16.Google Scholar PubMed

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 400–8.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. Evaluation of the fetal coronary circulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 405–12.Google Scholar

Cheema, R, Dubiel, M, Breborowicz, G, Gudmundsson, S. Fetal cerebral venous Doppler velocimetry in normal and high-risk pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 147–53.Google Scholar

Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233–39.Google Scholar

Thompson, RS, Trudinger, BJ. Doppler waveform pulsatility index and resistance, pressure and flow in the umbilical placental circulation: an investigation using a mathematical model. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16: 449–58.Google Scholar

Gilbert, WM, Nicolaides, KH, Sel, T, Campbell, S. Comparison of umbilical artery flow velocity waveform indices as measured by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7: 549–51.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11): CD007529.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 564–70.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 140–6.Google Scholar

DeVore, GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 5–15.Google Scholar

Khalil, AA, Morales-Rosello, J, Morlando, M, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 54.e1–10.Google Scholar

Acharya, G, Tronnes, A, Rasanen, J. Aortic isthmus and cardiac monitoring of the growth-restricted fetus. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 113–25, vi–vii.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bilardo, CM, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 115–20.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted foetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 240–5.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Talone, PE, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded foetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 401–10.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Medley, N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (4): CD001450.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harrington, KF, Campbell, S, Bewley, S, Bower, S. Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 42: S14–20.Google Scholar

Velauthar, L, Plana, MN, Kalidindi, M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 500–7.Google Scholar

Allen, RE, Morlando, M, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Predictive accuracy of second trimester uterine artery Doppler indices for stillbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 22–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14914.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus 2014. Green-top Guideline No. 31. London: RCOG, 2014. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_31.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Boyle, M. Antenatal investigations. In Henderson, C, Macdonald, S (eds), Mayes’ Midwifery: a Textbook for Midwives. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall, 2004.Google Scholar

Owen, P. Fetal assessment in the third trimester: fetal growth and biophysical methods. In Chamberlain, G, Steer, P (eds), Turnbull’s Obstetrics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2001.Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Lobb, M, Moulden, M, Redman, CWG, Wheeler, T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 791–7.Google Scholar

Valensise, H, Facchinetti, F, Vasapollo, B, et al. The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125: 185–92.Google Scholar

NHS Litigation Authority. Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data. London: NHS, 2012. http://www.nhsla.com/Pages/Publications.aspx?library=safety%7clearningfromclaims%7cmaternityclaimsdataproject (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Clinical Guidance CG190. London. NICE, 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 673–8.Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 1996; 24: 25–36.Google Scholar

Dawes, GS, Lobb, M, Moulden, M, Redman, CW, Wheeler, T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. BJOG 2014; 121 (Suppl 7): 2–8.Google Scholar

Serra, V, Bellver, J, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 74–9.Google Scholar

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance: Clinical Guideline, 3rd edn. Melbourne: RANZCOG, 2014. https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical-Obstetrics/Intrapartum-Fetal-Surveillance-Guideline-Third-edition-Aug-2014.pdf?ext=.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Bellver, J, Perales, A, Maiques, V, Serra, V. Can antepartum computerized cardiotocography predict the evolution of intrapartum acid-base status in normal fetuses? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 267–71.Google Scholar

Buscicchio, G, Giannubilo, SR, Bezzeccheri, V, et al. Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 39–42.Google Scholar

Guzman, ER, Vintzileos, AM, Martins, M, et al. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 969–74.Google Scholar

Soncini, E, Ronzoni, E, Macovei, D, Grignaffini, A. Integrated monitoring of fetal growth restriction by computerized cardiotocography and Doppler flow velocimetry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 128: 222–30.Google Scholar

Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (1): CD000038.Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GML, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD007863.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 38: 26–44.Google Scholar

Archibong, EI. Biophysical profile score in late pregnancy and timing of delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64: 129–33.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Walkinshaw, SA. A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 638–43.Google Scholar

Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (4): CD000038.Google Scholar

Bricker, L, Neilson, JP, Dowswell, T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD001451.Google Scholar

Bakalis, S, Peeva, G, Gonzalez, R, Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 446–51.Google Scholar

Kean, LH, Liu, DTY. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 16: 77–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF. Screening for fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 284–94.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333–7.Google Scholar

Chang, TC, Robson, SC, Boys, RJ, Spencer, JA. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 1030–8.Google Scholar

Robson, SC, Chang, TC. Intrauterine growth retardation. In Reed, G, Claireaux, A, Cockburn, F (eds), Diseases of the Fetus and the Newborn, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994, pp. 277–86.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, Sahota, D, Symonds, EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283–7.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F314–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pang, MW, Leung, TN, Sahota, DS, Lau, TK, Chang, AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 271–6.Google Scholar

Gestation Network. GROW growth charts. http://www.gestation.net/growthcharts.htm (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2.Google Scholar

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.Google Scholar

Proud, J, Grant, AM. Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal wellbeing. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1641–4.Google Scholar

Chen, KH, Seow, KM, Chen, LR. The role of preterm placental calcification on assessing risks of stillbirth. Placenta 2015; 36: 1039–44.Google Scholar

Forest, JC, Massé, J, Moutquin, JM. Screening for Down syndrome during first trimester: a prospective study using free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. Clin Biochem 1997; 30: 333–8.Google Scholar

Wise, J. Quadruple test is available for Down’s syndrome. BMJ 1996; 313: 380.Google Scholar

Lakhi, N, Govind, A, Moretti, M, Jones, J. Maternal serum analytes as markers of adverse obstetric outcome. Obstetrician Gynaecologist 2012; 14: 267–273.Google Scholar

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Molina, F, Kagan, KO, Nicolaides, KH. First trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of preterm or early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 147–52.Google Scholar

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Avgidou, K, Molina, F, Nicolaides, KH. First trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 15–19.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Low levels of maternal serum PAPP-A in the first trimester and the risk of pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 7–10.Google Scholar

Spencer, K, Cowans, NJ, Avgidou, K, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of impending fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 637–43.Google Scholar

Chappell, LC, Duckworth, S, Seed, PT, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2013; 128: 2121–31.Google Scholar

Griffin, M, Seed, PT, Webster, L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor and ultrasound parameters to predict the small-for-gestational-age infant in women presenting with reduced symphysis–fundus height. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 182–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Powers, RW, Jeyabalan, A, Clifton, RG, et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), endoglin and placental growth factor (PlGF) in preeclampsia among high risk pregnancies. PLoS One 2010; 5: e13263.Google Scholar

Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Sarquis, R, Zvanca, M, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diag 2011; 31: 66–74.Google Scholar

Nanda, S, Savvidou, M, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 135–41.Google Scholar

Gagnon, A, Wilson, RD, Audibert, F, et al; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Genetics Committee. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30: 918–49.Google Scholar

D’Alton, M, Cleary-Goldman, J. First and second trimester evaluation of risk for fetal aneuploidy: the secondary outcomes of the FASTER trial. Semin Perinatol 2005; 29: 240–6.Google Scholar

Dugoff, L, Hobbins, JC, Malone, FD, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: a population-based screening study (the FASTER trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1446–51.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Cnossen, JS, Langejans, M, et al. Serum screening with Down’s syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 33.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, YJ, Baer, RJ, Druzin, ML, et al. Association between maternal characteristics, abnormal serum aneuploidy analytes, and placental abruption. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 144.e1–9.Google Scholar

Salafia, CM, Silberman, L, Herrera, NE, Mahoney, MJ. Placental pathology at term associated with elevated midtrimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1064–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baschat, AA, Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 136–42.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 253–61.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR: The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Viscardi, RM, Hussey-Gardner, B, et al. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 44–50.Google Scholar

Frøen, JF, Gardosi, JO, Thurmann, A, Francis, A, Stray-Pedersen, B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 801–7.Google Scholar

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.Google Scholar

Metzger, BE, Lowe, LP, Dyer, AR, et al.; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991–2002.Google Scholar

Poon, L, Kametas, NA, Maiz, A, et al. First trimester prediction of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Hypertension 2009; 53: 812–18.Google Scholar

Thornton, JG, Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, et al.; GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 513–20.Google Scholar

Vainio, M, Kujansuu, E, Iso-Mustajarvi, M, Maenpaa, J. Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches. BJOG 2002; 109: 161–7.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Fleming, AD, Scorza, WE, et al. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 707–13.Google Scholar

Lubchenco, LO, Hansman, C, Boyd, E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from live born birth-weight data at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 793.Google Scholar

Battaglia, FC, Lubchenco, LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 1967; 71: 159–63.Google Scholar

Bernstein, IM, Horbar, JD, Badger, GJ, Ohlsson, A, Golan, A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 198–206.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ. Fetal growth and adult disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 275–6.Google Scholar

Hoffman, HJ, Stark, CR, Lundin, FE, Ashbrook, JD. Analysis of birth weight, gestational age, and fetal viability, U. S. births, 1968. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1974; 29: 651–81.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, Sahota, D, Symonds, EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339: 283–7.Google Scholar

Clausson, B, Gardosi, J, Francis, A, Cnattingius, S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 830–4.Google Scholar

Bukowski, R, Burgett, AD, Gei, A, Saade, GR, Hankins, GD V. Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1011–15.Google Scholar

Miller, HC. Fetal growth and neonatal mortality. Pediatrics 1972; 49: 392–9.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Robinson, D. Sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation using the postnatal ponderal index and the crown-heel length as standards of diagnosis. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 380–3.Google Scholar

Walther, FJ, Ramaekers, LH. The ponderal index as a measure of the nutritional status at birth and its relation to some aspects of neonatal morbidity. J Perinat Med 1982; 10: 42–7.Google Scholar

Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Lucas, MJ, Leveno, KJ. Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 321–7.Google Scholar

Seval, Y, Sati, L, Celik-Ozenci, C, Taskin, O, Demir, R. The distribution of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 and their receptors Tie-1 and Tie-2 in the very early human placenta. Placenta 2008; 29: 809–15.Google Scholar

Ahmed, A, Dunk, C, Ahmad, S, Khaliq, A. Regulation of placental vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placenta growth factor (PlGF) and soluble Flt-1 by oxygen: a review. Placenta 2000; 21 (Suppl 1): S16–24.Google Scholar

Baumann, MU, Bersinger, NA, Surbek, D V. Serum markers for predicting pre-eclampsia. Mol Aspects Med 2007; 28: 227–44.Google Scholar

Pijnenborg, R, Bland, JM, Robertson, WB, Brosens, I. Uteroplacental arterial changes related to interstitial trophoblast migration in early human pregnancy. Placenta 1983; 4: 397–413.Google Scholar

Aplin, J. Maternal influences on placental development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2000; 11: 115–25.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kingdom, JC, Burrell, SJ, Kaufmann, P. Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 271–86.Google Scholar

Castellucci, M, Kosanke, G, Verdenelli, F, Huppertz, B, Kaufmann, P. Villous sprouting: fundamental mechanisms of human placental development. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 485–94.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kaufmann, P, Scheffen, I. Placental development. In Polin, RA, Fox, WW (eds), Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1998, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

Pardi, G, Marconi, AM, Cetin, I. Placental–fetal interrelationship in IUGR fetuses: a review. Placenta 2002; 23 (Suppl A): S136–41.Google Scholar

Battaglia, FC, Regnault, TRH. Placental transport and metabolism of amino acids. Placenta 2001; 22: 145–61.Google Scholar

Haggarty, P. Placental regulation of fatty acid delivery and its effect on fetal growth: a review. Placenta 2002; 23: S28–38.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Illsley, NP. Glucose transporters in the human placenta. Placenta 2000; 21: 14–22.Google Scholar

Sibley, CP, Glazier, JD, Greenwood, SL, et al. Regulation of placental transfer: the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger: a review. Placenta 2002; 23 (Suppl A): S39–46.Google Scholar

Meschia, G. Placenta respiratory gas exchange and fetal oxygenation. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R (eds), Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1987, pp. 274–85.Google Scholar

Carter, AM. Placental oxygen consumption. Part I: in vivo studies – a review. Placenta 2000; 21 (Suppl A): S31–7.Google Scholar

Lederman, SA, Paxton, A, Heymsfield, SB, et al. Maternal body fat and water during pregnancy: Do they raise infant birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 235–40.Google Scholar

Reece, EA, Wiznitzer, A, Le, E, et al. The relation between human fetal growth and fetal blood levels of insulin-like growth factors I and II, their binding proteins, and receptors. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 88–95.Google Scholar

Hoggard, N, Haggarty, P, Thomas, L, Lea, RG. Leptin expression in placental and fetal tissues: does leptin have a functional role? Biochem Soc Trans 2001; 29: 57–63.Google Scholar

Jansson, N, Greenwood, SL, Johansson, BR, Powell, TL, Jansson, T. Leptin stimulates the activity of the system A amino acid transporter in human placental villous fragments. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 1205–11.Google Scholar

Rudolph, AM. Distribution and regulation of blood flow in the fetal and neonatal lamb. Circ Res 1985; 57: 811–21.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA. The fetal circulation and essential organs: a new twist to an old tale. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 349–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guyton, AC, Cowley, AW, Young, DB, et al. Integration and control of circulatory function. Int Rev Physiol 1976; 9: 341–85.Google Scholar

Winick, M, Noble, A. Quantitative changes in DNA, RNA, and protein during prenatal and postnatal growth in the rat. Dev Biol 1965; 12: 451–66.Google Scholar

Snijders, RJ, Sherrod, C, Gosden, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 547–55.Google Scholar

Khoury, MJ, Erickson, JD, Cordero, JF, McCarthy, BJ. Congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation: a population study. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 83–90.Google Scholar

Sickler, GK, Nyberg, DA, Sohaey, R, Luthy, DA. Polyhydramnios and fetal intrauterine growth restriction: ominous combination. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16: 609–14.Google Scholar

Ødegård, RA, Vatten, LJ, Nilsen, ST, Salvesen, KÅ, Austgulen, R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 950–5.Google Scholar

Kupferminc, MJ, Peri, H, Zwang, E, et al. High prevalence of the prothrombin gene mutation in women with intrauterine growth retardation, abruptio placentae and second trimester loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 963–7.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and potential treatments for severe, early onset growth retardation. Semin Perinatol 1989; 13: 320–7.Google Scholar

Cliver, SP, Goldenberg, RL, Cutter, GR, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on neonatal anthropometric measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 625–30.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP, Cutter, GR, et al. Blood pressure, growth retardation, and preterm delivery. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1992; 8 (Suppl 1): 82–90.Google Scholar

Ferrazzi, E, Bulfamante, G, Mezzopane, R, et al. Uterine Doppler velocimetry and placental hypoxic-ischemic lesion in pregnancies with fetal intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta 1999; 20: 389–94.Google Scholar

Harrington, K, Carpenter, RG, Goldfrad, C, Campbell, S. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasound of the uteroplacental circulation in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 674–81.Google Scholar

Bower, S, Kingdom, J, Campbell, S. Objective and subjective assessment of abnormal uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 260–4.Google Scholar

Rigano, S, Bozzo, M, Ferrazzi, E, et al. Early and persistent reduction in umbilical vein blood flow in the growth-restricted fetus: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 834–8.Google Scholar

Morrow, RJ, Adamson, SL, Bull, SB, Ritchie, JW. Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1055–60.Google Scholar

Wilcox, GR, Trudinger, BJ, Cook, CM, Wilcox, WR, Connelly, AJ. Reduced fetal platelet counts in pregnancies with abnormal Doppler umbilical flow waveforms. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 639–43.Google Scholar PubMed

Papageorghiou, AT, Yu, CKH, Cicero, S, Bower, S, Nicolaides, KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 12: 78–88.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP. The relationship between the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio and umbilical blood gas measurements in specimens obtained by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1198–202.Google Scholar

Bilardo, CM, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 115–20.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Spernol, R, Stettner, H, Szalay, S. Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by Doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 266–71.Google Scholar

Crimmins, S, Desai, A, Block-Abraham, D, et al. A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 669.e1–10.Google Scholar

Jones, CT, Ritchie, JW, Walker, D. The effects of hypoxia on glucose turnover in the fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1983; 5: 223–35.Google Scholar

Nicolini, U, Hubinont, C, Santolaya, J, et al. Maternal–fetal glucose gradient in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by alloimmunization and fetal growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 924–7.Google Scholar

Economides, DL, Nicolaides, KH. Blood glucose and oxygen tension levels in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 385–9.Google Scholar

Hubinont, C, Nicolini, U, Fisk, NM, Tannirandorn, Y, Rodeck, CH. Endocrine pancreatic function in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 541–4.Google Scholar

Van Assche, FA, Aerts, L, De Prins, FA. The fetal endocrine pancreas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 18: 267–72.Google Scholar

Soothill, PW, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Prenatal asphyxia, hyperlacticaemia, hypoglycaemia, and erythroblastosis in growth retarded fetuses. Br Med J 1987; 294: 1051–3.Google Scholar

Owens, JA, Falconer, J, Robinson, JS. Effect of restriction of placental growth on fetal and utero-placental metabolism. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 225–38.Google Scholar

Paolini, CL, Marconi, AM, Ronzoni, S, et al. Placental transport of leucine, phenylalanine, glycine, and proline in intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5427–32.Google Scholar

Economides, DL, Nicolaides, KH, Gahl, WA, Bernardini, I, Evans, MI. Plasma amino acids in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1219–27.Google Scholar

Bernstein, IM, Silver, R, Nair, KS, Stirewalt, WS. Amniotic fluid glycine-valine ratio and neonatal morbidity in fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 933–7.Google Scholar

Vannucci, RC, Vannucci, SJ. Glucose metabolism in the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 2000; 24: 107–15.Google Scholar

Fisher, DJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Fetal myocardial oxygen and carbohydrate consumption during acutely induced hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H657–61.Google Scholar

Spahr, R, Probst, I, Piper, HM. Substrate utilization of adult cardiac myocytes. Basic Res Cardiol 1985; 80 (Suppl 1): 53–6.Google Scholar

Fant, ME, Weisoly, D. Insulin and insulin-like growth factors in human development: implications for the perinatal period. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 426–35.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Arduini, D. Fetal cardiac function in intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 876–82.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Gortner, L, et al. Coronary artery blood flow visualization signifies hemodynamic deterioration in growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 425–31.Google Scholar

Reed, KL, Anderson, CF, Shenker, L. Changes in intracardiac Doppler blood flow velocities in fetuses with absent umbilical artery diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 774–9.Google Scholar

al-Ghazali, W, Chita, SK, Chapman, MG, Allan, LD. Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 697–704.Google Scholar

Griffin, D, Bilardo, K, Masini, L, et al. Doppler blood flow waveforms in the descending thoracic aorta of the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 997–1006.Google Scholar

Akalin-Sel, T, Nicolaides, KH, Peacock, J, Campbell, S. Doppler dynamics and their complex interrelation with fetal oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide pressure, and pH in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 439–44.Google Scholar

Wladimiroff, JW, Tonge, HM, Stewart, PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 471–5.Google Scholar

Arbeille, P, Maulik, D, Fignon, A, Stale, H, Berson, M, Bodard, S, et al. Assessment of the fetal PO2 changes by cerebral and umbilical Doppler on lamb fetuses during acute hypoxia. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 861–70.Google Scholar

Fouron, JC, Skoll, A, Sonesson, SE, et al. Relationship between flow through the fetal aortic isthmus and cerebral oxygenation during acute placental circulatory insufficiency in ovine fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1102–7.Google Scholar

Boito, S, Struijk, PC, Ursem, NTC, Fedele, L, Wladimiroff, JW. Fetal brain/liver volume ratio and umbilical volume flow parameters relative to normal and abnormal human development. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 256–61.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 557–77.Google Scholar

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Computerized analysis of behavioural states in asymmetrical growth retarded fetuses. J Perinat Med 1988; 16: 357–63.Google Scholar

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Caforio, L, et al. Behavioural state transitions in healthy and growth retarded fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19: 155–65.Google Scholar

Nijhuis, IJM, Ten Hof, J, Nijhuis, JG, et al. Temporal organization of fetal behavior from 24-weeks gestation onwards in normal and complicated pregnancies. Dev Psychobiol 1999; 34: 257–68.Google Scholar

Vindla, S, James, D, Sahota, D. Computerised analysis of unstimulated and stimulated behaviour in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 83: 37–45.Google Scholar

Yum, MK, Park, EY, Kim, CR, Hwang, JH. Alterations in irregular and fractal heart rate behavior in growth restricted fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 94: 51–8.Google Scholar

Ribbert, LS, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Prediction of fetal acidaemia in intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of quantified fetal activity with biophysical profile score. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 653–6.Google Scholar

Nijhuis, IJM, Ten Hof, J, Mulder, EJH, et al. Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 89: 27–33.Google Scholar

Henson, G, Dawes, GS, Redman, CW. Characterization of the reduced heart rate variation in growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 751–5.Google Scholar

Ribbert, LS, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Relation of fetal blood gases and data from computer-assisted analysis of fetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 820–3.Google Scholar

Smith, JH, Anand, KJ, Cotes, PM, et al. Antenatal fetal heart rate variation in relation to the respiratory and metabolic status of the compromised human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 980–9.Google Scholar

Ribbert, LSM, Visser, GHA, Mulder, EJH, Zonneveld, MF, Morssink, LP. Changes with time in fetal heart rate variation, movement incidences and haemodynamics in intrauterine growth retarded fetuses: A longitudinal approach to the assessment of fetal well being. Early Hum Dev 1993; 31: 195–208.Google Scholar

Pillai, M, James, D. Continuation of normal neurobehavioural development in fetuses with absent umbilical arterial end diastolic velocities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 277–81.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Arduini, D, Pennestri, F, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Fetal behaviour in growth retardation: its relationship to fetal blood flow. Prenat Diagn 1987; 7: 229–38.Google Scholar

Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Rinaldo, D, Romanini, C. Fetal pH value determined by cordocentesis: an independent predictor of the development of antepartum fetal heart rate decelerations in growth retarded fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery. J Perinat Med 1996; 24: 601–7.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA. Integrated fetal testing in growth restriction: combining multivessel Doppler and biophysical parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 1–8.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA. Evaluation of severe growth retardation using cordocentesis–hematologic and metabolic alterations by etiology. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 225–9.Google Scholar

Thilaganathan, B, Athanasiou, S, Ozmen, S, et al. Umbilical cord blood erythroblast count as an index of intrauterine hypoxia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1994; 70: F192–4.Google Scholar

Maier, RF, Günther, A, Vogel, M, Dudenhausen, JW, Obladen, M. Umbilical venous erythropoietin and umbilical arterial pH in relation to morphologic placental abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 81–7.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell counts in growth-restricted fetuses: Relationship to arterial and venous Doppler studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 190–5.Google Scholar

Bernstein, PS, Minior, VK, Divon, MY. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell counts in small-for-gestational age fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1079–84.Google Scholar

Trudinger, B, Song, JZ, Wu, ZH, Wang, J. Placental insufficiency is characterized by platelet activation in the fetus. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 975–81.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Absent umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity in growth-restricted fetuses: a risk factor for neonatal thrombocytopenia. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 162–6.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Rinaldo, D, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Ventricular ejection force in growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 247–55.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Doyle, P, Harrington, K, Nicolaides, K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation. Arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 1995; 91: 129–38.Google Scholar

Kiserud, T, Eik-Nes, SH, Blaas, HG, Hellevik, LR, Simensen, B. Ductus venosus blood velocity and the umbilical circulation in the seriously growth-retarded fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 109–14.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Talone, PE, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 401–10.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, S, Tulzer, G, Huhta, JC, Marsal, K. Venous Doppler in the fetus with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 262–7.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Fleming, AD, Scorza, WE, et al. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 707–13.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar

Guzman, ER, Vintzileos, AM, Martins, M, et al. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 969–74.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Pietropolli, A, et al. Fetal cardiac and extracardiac flows preceding intrauterine death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 139–42.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.Google Scholar

James, DK, Parker, MJ, Smoleniec, JS. Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasonographic characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1486–95.Google Scholar

Harrington, K, Thompson, MO, Carpenter, RG, Nguyen, M, Campbell, S. Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 453–66.Google Scholar

Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 140–6.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 564–70.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Reiss, I, et al. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 407–13.Google Scholar

Hershkovitz, R, Kingdom, JCP, Geary, M, Rodeck, CH. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: Identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 209–12.Google Scholar

Vainio, M, Kujansuu, E, Iso-Mustajarvi, M, Maenpaa, J. Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches. BJOG 2002; 109: 161–7.Google Scholar

Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. First-trimester maternal factors and biomarker screening for preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 618–27.Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Block-Abraham, DM, Turan, OM, et al. First-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates incorporating fetal Doppler parameters and maternal characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 261.Google Scholar

Odibo, AO, Zhong, Y, Goetzinger, KR, et al. First-trimester placental protein 13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Placenta 2011; 32: 598–602.Google Scholar

Schneuer, FJ, Nassar, N, Khambalia, AZ, et al. First trimester screening of maternal placental protein 13 for predicting preeclampsia and small for gestational age: In-house study and systematic review. Placenta 2012; 33: 735–40.Google Scholar

Soregaroli, M, Valcamonico, A, Scalvi, L, Danti, L, Frusca, T. Late normalisation of uterine artery velocimetry in high risk pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 95: 42–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coleman, MAG, McCowan, LME, North, RA. Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 7–12.Google Scholar

Yu, CKH, Papageorghiou, AT, Parra, M, Palma, Dias R, Nicolaides, KH. Randomized controlled trial using low-dose aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 233–9.Google Scholar

Seravalli, V, Block-Abraham, DM, Turan, OM, et al. Second-trimester prediction of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age neonate: integrating sequential Doppler information, fetal biometry, and maternal characteristics. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1037–43.Google Scholar

Warsof, SL, Cooper, DJ, Little, D, Campbell, S. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 33–9.Google Scholar

Bakketeig, LS, Eik-Nes, SH, Jacobsen, G. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2: 207–11.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RJ, Park, SK. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 83–5.Google Scholar

Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2.Google Scholar

Tamura, RK, Sabbagha, RE, Pan, WH, Vaisrub, N. Ultrasonic fetal abdominal circumference: comparison of direct versus calculated measurement. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 833–5.Google Scholar

Smith, PA, Johansson, D, Tzannatos, C, Campbell, S. Prenatal measurement of the fetal cerebellum and cisterna cerebellomedullaris by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 1986; 6: 133–41.Google Scholar

Campbell, S, Thoms, A. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 165–74.Google Scholar

Gray, DL, Songster, GS, Parvin, CA, Crane, JP. Cephalic index: a gestational age-dependent biometric parameter. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 600–3.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Shah, Y, Park, SK. The femur length/head circumference relation in obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 439–42.Google Scholar

Sarmandal, P, Grant, JM. Effectiveness of ultrasound determination of fetal abdominal circumference and fetal ponderal index in the diagnosis of asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 118–23.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Deter, RL, Harrist, RB, Roecker, E, Park, SK. A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: Femur length/abdominal circumference ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141: 979–84.Google Scholar

Shepard, MJ, Richards, VA, Berkowitz, RL, Warsof, SL, Hobbins, JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 47–54.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Sharman, RS, Deter, RL, Park, SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Sabbagha, RE, Vaisrub, N, Socol, ML. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 812–17.Google Scholar

Stirnemann, J, Villar, J, Salomon, LJ, et al. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 478–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17347.Google Scholar

Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Da Silva Costa, F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 715–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20272.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. II. The relationship of increased amniotic fluid volume to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 250–4.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Hill, LM, Platt, LD. Qualitative amniotic fluid volume determination by ultrasound: antepartum detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 254–8.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 124–7.Google Scholar

Reed, KL, Appleton, CP, Anderson, CF, Shenker, L, Sahn, DJ. Doppler studies of vena cava flows in human fetuses. Insights into normal and abnormal cardiac physiology. Circulation 1990; 81: 498–505.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Snijders, R, Nicolaides, K. Reference ranges for fetal venous and atrioventricular blood flow parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 381–90.Google Scholar

Kanzaki, T, Chiba, Y. Evaluation of the preload condition of the fetus by inferior vena caval blood flow pattern. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 168–74.Google Scholar

DeVore, GR, Horenstein, J. Ductus venosus index: a method for evaluating right ventricular preload in the second-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 338–42.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Güclü, S, Kush, ML, et al. Venous Doppler in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses with elevated placental blood flow resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 277–84.Google Scholar

Ott, WJ. Intrauterine growth restriction and Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 661–5.Google Scholar

Strigini, FAL, De Luca, G, Lencioni, G, et al. Middle cerebral artery velocimetry: Different clinical relevance depending on umbilical velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 953–7.Google Scholar

Severi, FM, Bocchi, C, Visentin, A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 225–8.Google Scholar

McCowan, LM, Harding, JE, Roberts, AB, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 81–6.Google Scholar

Westergaard, HB, Langhoff-Roos, J, Lingman, G, Marsál, K, Kreiner, S. A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: Use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 466–76.Google Scholar

Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: Results of the multicenter PORTO Study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014; 211: 288.e1–5.Google Scholar

Bahado-Singh, RO, Kovanci, E, Jeffres, A, et al. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 750–6.Google Scholar

Ribbert, LS, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH, Visser, GH. Relationship of fetal biophysical profile and blood gas values at cordocentesis in severely growth-retarded fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 569–71.Google Scholar

Clausson, B, Cnattingius, S, Axelsson, O. Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 758–62.Google Scholar

Frøen, JF, Gardosi, JO, Thurmann, A, Francis, A, Stray-Pedersen, B. Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 801–7.Google Scholar

Kupferminc, MJ, Many, A, Bar-Am, A, Lessing, JB, Ascher-Landsberg, J. Mid-trimester severe intrauterine growth restriction is associated with a high prevalence of thrombophilia. BJOG 2002; 109: 1373–6.Google Scholar

Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Wilkins-Haug, L, Ringer, S. Fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 359–63.Google Scholar

Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 333–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15884.Google Scholar

Van den Veyver, IB, Ni, J, Bowles, N, et al. Detection of intrauterine viral infection using the polymerase chain reaction. Mol Genet Metab 1998; 63: 85–95.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Towbin, J, Bowles, NE, Harman, CR, Weiner, CP. Is adenovirus a fetal pathogen? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 758–63.Google Scholar

Gudmundsson, S, Lindblad, A, Marsál, K. Cord blood gases and absence of end-diastolic blood velocities in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev 1990; 24: 231–7.Google Scholar

Yoon, BH, Romero, R, Roh, CR, et al. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1586–94.Google Scholar

Nicolini, U, Nicolaidis, P, Fisk, NM, et al. Limited role of fetal blood sampling in prediction of outcome in intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet 1990; 336: 768–72.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Snijders, R, Campbell, S, Nicolaides, K. Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: Relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 10–15.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. The value of fetal arterial, cardiac and venous flows in predicting pH and blood gases measured in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 963–9.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 240–5.Google Scholar

Ley, D, Tideman, E, Laurin, J, Bjerre, I, Marsal, K. Abnormal fetal aortic velocity waveform and intellectual function at 7 years of age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 160–5.Google Scholar

Škrablin, S, Kalafatić, D, Banović, I, et al. Antenatal predictors of the neurologic sequelae at 3 years of age: a multivariate analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 93: 173–80.Google Scholar

Fouron, JC, Gosselin, J, Raboisson, MJ, et al. The relationship between an aortic isthmus blood flow velocity index and the postnatal neurodevelopmental status of fetuses with placental circulatory insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 497–503.Google Scholar

Thornton, JG, Hornbuckle, J, Vail, A, Spiegelhalter, DJ, Levene, M.; GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 513–20.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Viscardi, RM, Hussey-Gardner, B, Hashmi, N, Harman, C. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 44–50.Google Scholar

Schreuder, AM, McDonnell, M, Gaffney, G, Johnson, A, Hope, PL. Outcome at school age following antenatal detection of absent or reversed end diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86: F108–14.Google Scholar

Eixarch, E, Meler, E, Iraola, A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in 2-year-old infants who were small-for-gestational age term fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 894–9.Google Scholar

Scherjon, S, Briët, J, Oosting, H, Kok, J. The discrepancy between maturation of visual-evoked potentials and cognitive outcome at five years in very preterm infants with and without hemodynamic signs of fetal brain-sparing. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 385–91.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 5: 975–85.Google Scholar

Arabin, B, Becker, R, Mohnhaupt, A, Entezami, M, Weitzel, HK. Prediction of fetal distress and poor outcome in intrauterine growth retardation: a comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring combined with stress tests and Doppler ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993; 8: 234–40.Google Scholar

Ott, WJ, Mora, G, Arias, F, Sunderji, S, Sheldon, G. Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a “new” biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1346–53.Google Scholar

Weiner, Z, Farmakides, G, Schulman, H, Lopresti, S, Schneider, E. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 112–18.Google Scholar

Arabin, B, Snyjders, R, Mohnhaupt, A, Ragosch, V, Nicolaides, K. Evaluation of the fetal assessment score in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 549–54.Google Scholar

Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 750–6.Google Scholar

Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 160–7.Google Scholar

Wapner, RJ, Martin, CL, Levy, B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2175–84.Google Scholar

GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110: 27–32.Google Scholar

Trudinger, BJ, Cook, CM, Thompson, RS, Giles, WB, Connelly, A. Low-dose aspirin therapy improves fetal weight in umbilical placental insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 681–5.Google Scholar

Newnham, JP, Godfrey, M, Walters, BJ, Phillips, J, Evans, SF. Low dose aspirin for the treatment of fetal growth restriction: a randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 370–4.Google Scholar

CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. Lancet 1994; 343: 619–29.Google Scholar

Kozer, E, Nikfar, S, Costei, A, et al. Aspirin consumption during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital anomalies: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1623–30.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S, Bradley, RJ, et al. Maternal oxygen therapy for intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet 1987; 1: 942–5.Google Scholar

Battaglia, C, Artini, PG, D’Ambrogio, G, et al. Maternal hyperoxygenation in the treatment of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 430–5.Google Scholar

Karsdorp, VH, van Vugt, JM, Dekker, GA, van Geijn, HP. Reappearance of end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery following maternal volume expansion: a preliminary study. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 679–83.Google Scholar

Ronzoni, S, Marconi, AM, Paolini, CL, et al. The effect of a maternal infusion of amino acids on umbilical uptake in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 741–6.Google Scholar

Ley, D, Wide-Swensson, D, Lindroth, M, Svenningsen, N, Marsal, K. Respiratory distress syndrome in infants with impaired intrauterine growth. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86: 1090–6.Google Scholar

Unterscheider, J, O’Donoghue, K, Daly, S, et al. Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 63.Google Scholar

Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 400–8.Google Scholar

Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 290.e1–6.Google Scholar

Divon, MY, Girz, BA, Lieblich, R, Langer, O. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1523–7.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 571–7.Google Scholar

Cosmi, E, Ambrosini, G, D’Antona, D, Saccardi, C, Mari, G. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1240–5.Google Scholar

Hernandez-Andrade, E, Stampalija, T, Figueras, F. Cerebral blood flow studies in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25: 138–44.Google Scholar

Cruz-Martínez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Oros, D, Gratacos, E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 618–26.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 253–61.Google Scholar

Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Campbell, S, Ross, EM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal oxygenation at cordocentesis, maternal smoking and childhood neuro-development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59: 21–4.Google Scholar

Kahn, B, Lumey, LH, Zybert, PA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 685–92.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 49: 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009.Google Scholar

Lees, CC, Marlow, N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162–72.Google Scholar

Trudell, AS, Cahill, AG, Tuuli, MG, Macones, GA, Odibo, AO. Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 376.e1–7.Google Scholar

Boers, KE, van Wyk, L, van der Post, JAM, et al. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 344.e1–7.Google Scholar

Sotiriadis, A, Tsiami, A, Papatheodorou, S, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome after a single course of antenatal steroids in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1385–96.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 136–42.Google Scholar

Arcangeli, T, Thilaganathan, B, Hooper, R, Khan, KS, Bhide, A. Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 267–75.Google Scholar

Figueras, F, Oros, D, Cruz-Martinez, R, et al. Neurobehavior in term, small-for-gestational age infants with normal placental function. Pediatrics 2009; 124: e934–41.Google Scholar

Figueras, F, Eixarch, E, Meler, E, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 34–8.Google Scholar

Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Sanz-Cortes, M, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 288–94.Google Scholar

Llurba, E, Baschat, AA, Turan, OM, Harding, J, McCowan, LM. Childhood cognitive development after fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 383–9.Google Scholar

Savchev, S, Sanz-Cortes, M, Cruz-Martinez, R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants with normal placental function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 201–6.Google Scholar

Van Wyk, L, Boers, KE, Van Der Post, JAM, et al. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 406.e1–7.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Weiner, CP. Umbilical artery Doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 154–8.Google Scholar

Spellacy, WN, Miller, S, Winegar, A, Peterson, PQ. Macrosomia: maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 158–61.Google Scholar

Menticoglou, SM, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR. Must macrosomic fetuses be delivered by a caesarean section? A review of outcome for 786 babies greater than or equal to 4,500 g. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 32: 100–3.Google Scholar

Lipscomb, KR, Gregory, K, Shaw, K. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles county + University of Southern California experience. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 558–64.Google Scholar

Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: Effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669–74.Google Scholar

Dooley, SL, Metzger, BE, Cho, NH. Gestational diabetes mellitus: influence of race on disease prevalence and perinatal outcome in a U.S. population. Diabetes 1991; 40 (Suppl 2): 25–9.Google Scholar

Okun, N, Verma, A, Mitchell, BF, Flowerdew, G. Relative importance of maternal constitutional factors and glucose intolerance of pregnancy in the development of newborn macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6: 285–90.Google Scholar

Black, MH, Sacks, DA, Xiang, AH, Lawrence, JM. The relative contribution of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG-defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 56–62.Google Scholar

Gaudet, L, Ferraro, ZM, Wen, SW, Walker, M. Maternal obesity and occurrence of fetal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 640291.Google Scholar

Cogswell, ME, Serdula, MK, Hungerford, DW, Yip, R. Gestational weight gain among average-weight and overweight women–what is excessive? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 705–12.Google Scholar

Ogunyemi, D, Hullett, S, Leeper, J, Risk, A. Prepregnancy body mass index, weight gain during pregnancy, and perinatal outcome in a rural black population. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7: 190–3.Google Scholar

Lazer, S, Biale, Y, Mazor, M, Lewenthal, H, Insler, V. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 501–5.Google Scholar

Klebanoff, MA, Mills, JL, Berendes, HW. Mother’s birth weight as a predictor of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 253–7.Google Scholar

Langer, O, Levy, J, Brustman, L, et al. Glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus–how tight is tight enough: small for gestational age versus large for gestational age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 646–53.Google Scholar

Carpenter, MW, Canick, JA, Hogan, JW, et al. Amniotic fluid insulin at 14–20 weeks’ gestation: Association with later maternal glucose intolerance and birth macrosomia. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1259–63.Google Scholar

Metzger, BE, Lowe, LP, Dyer, AR, et al.; HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1991–2002.Google Scholar

Nasrat, H, Abalkhail, B, Fageeh, W, Shabat, A, El Zahrany, F. Anthropometric measurements of newborns of gestational diabetic mothers: does it indicate disproportionate fetal growth? J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6: 291–5.Google Scholar

McFarland, MB, Trylovich, CG, Langer, O. Anthropometric differences in macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers. J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7: 292–5.Google Scholar

Ferber, A. Maternal complications of fetal macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 335–9.Google Scholar

Boulet, SL, Alexander, GR, Salihu, HM, Pass, M. Macrosomic births in the United States: Determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1372–8.Google Scholar

Perlow, JH, Wigton, T, Hart, J, et al. Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 754–60.Google Scholar

Acker, DB, Gregory, KD, Sachs, BP, Friedman, EA. Risk factors for Erb-Duchenne palsy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 389–92.Google Scholar

Ecker, JL, Greenberg, JA, Norwitz, ER, Nadel, AS, Repke, JT. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 643–7.Google Scholar

Esakoff, TF, Cheng, YW, Sparks, TN, Caughey, AB. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 672.e1–4.Google Scholar

Chez, RA, Carlan, S, Greenberg, SL, Spellacy, WN. Fractured clavicle is an unavoidable event. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 797–8.Google Scholar

Gherman, RB, Ouzounian, JG, Goodwin, TM. Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1303–7.Google Scholar

Bérard, J, Dufour, P, Vinatier, D, Subtil, D, Vanderstichèle, S, Monnier, JC, et al. Fetal macrosomia: Risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 77: 51–9.Google Scholar

Catalano, PM, Ehrenberg, HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG 2006; 113: 1126–33.Google Scholar

Stones, RW, Paterson, CM, Saunders, NJ. Risk factors for major obstetric haemorrhage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 48: 15–8.Google Scholar

El Madany, AA, Jallad, KB, Radi, FA, El Hamdan, H, O’deh, HM. Shoulder dystocia: Anticipation and outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 34: 7–12.Google Scholar

Baschat, AA, Harman, CR, Farid, G, Chodirker, BN, Evans, JA. Very low second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein: Association with high birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 531–6.Google Scholar

Wikström, I, Bergström, R, Bakketeig, L, Jacobsen, G, Lindmark, G. Prediction of high birthweight from maternal characteristics, symphysis fundal height and ultrasound biometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 35: 27–33.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP. Symphysis–fundal height measurement in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000944.Google Scholar

Gonen, R, Spiegel, D, Abend, M. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable? Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 526–9.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Hendrix, NW, Magann, EF, et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 72–7.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Sullivan, CA, Lutton, TC, Magann, EF, Morrison, JC. Parous patients’ estimate of birth weight in postterm pregnancy. J Perinatol 1995; 15: 192–4.Google Scholar

Sherman, DJ, Arieli, S, Tovbin, J, Siegel, G, Caspi, E, Bukovsky, I. A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 212–17.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Cowan, BD, Magann, EF, Bradford, TH, Roberts, WE, Morrison, JC. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 266–70.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, BR, Gelman, R, Frigoletto, FD. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1118–21.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Smith, MF, McNay, MB, Fleming, JE. The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 186–90.Google Scholar

O’Reilly-Green, CP, Divon, MY. Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 403–8.Google Scholar

Alsulyman, OM, Ouzounian, JG, Kjos, SL. The accuracy of intrapartum ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 503–6.Google Scholar

Rigano, S, Ferrazzi, E, Radaelli, T, Cetin, ET, Pardi, G. Sonographic measurements of subcutaneous fetal fat in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes and in normal pregnancies. Croat Med J 2000; 41: 240–4.Google Scholar

Combs, CA, Jaekle, RK, Rosenn, B, Pope, M, Miodovnik, M, Siddiqi, TA. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 365–70.Google Scholar

Hawkins, JS, Casey, BM, Lo, JY, Moss, K, McIntire, DD, Leveno, KJ. Weekly compared with daily blood glucose monitoring in women with diet-treated gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1307–12.Google Scholar

Gonen, O, Rosen, DJD, Dolfin, Z, et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 913–17.Google Scholar

Sanchez-Ramos, L, Bernstein, S, Kaunitz, AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 997–1002.Google Scholar

Rouse, DJ, Owen, J, Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996; 276: 1480–6.Google Scholar

Flamm, BL, Goings, JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 694–7.Google Scholar

Brace, RA. Physiology of amniotic fluid volume regulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 280–9.Google Scholar

Gulbis, B, Jauniaux, E, Cotton, F, Stordeur, P. Protein and enzyme patterns in the fluid cavities of the first trimester gestational sac: relevance to the absorptive role of secondary yolk sac. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 857–62.Google Scholar

Campbell, J, Wathen, N, Perry, G, et al. The coelomic cavity: an important site of materno-fetal nutrient exchange in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 765–7.Google Scholar

Campbell, J, Wathen, N, Macintosh, M, et al. Biochemical composition of amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 563–5.Google Scholar

Brace, RA, Ross, MG. Amniotic fluid volume regulation. In Brace, RA, Hanson, MA, Rodeck, CH (eds), Fetus and Neonate, Volume 4: Body Fluids and Kidney Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 88.Google Scholar

Jang, PR, Brace, RA. Amniotic fluid composition changes during urine drainage and tracheoesophageal occlusion in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1732–41.Google Scholar

Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, et al. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1070–82.Google Scholar

Dildy, GA, Lira, N, Moise, KJ, Riddle, GD, Deter, RL. Amniotic fluid assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye dilution technique in human pregnancy. Am J Obset Gynecol 1992; 167: 986–94.Google Scholar

Magann, EF, Perry, KG, Chauhan, SP, et al. The accuracy of ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume in singleton pregnancies: the effect of operator experience and ultrasound interpretative technique. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 249–53.Google Scholar

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.Google Scholar

Moore, TR, Cayle, JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1168–73.Google Scholar

Magann, EF, Whitworth, NS, Klausen, JH, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in evaluating amniotic fluid volume at less than 24 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 895–7.Google Scholar

Ippolito, DL, Bergstrom, JE, Lutgendorf, MA, Flood-Nichols, SK, Magann, EF. A systematic review of amniotic fluid assessments in twin pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1353–64.Google Scholar

Locatelli, A, Zagarella, A, Toso, L, et al. Serial assessment of amniotic fluid index in uncomplicated term pregnancies: prognostic value of amniotic fluid reduction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15: 233–6.Google Scholar

Bromley, B, Harlow, BL, Laboda, LA, Benacerraf, BR. Small sac size in the first trimester: a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Radiology 1991; 178: 375–7.Google Scholar

Tadmor, OP, Achiron, R, Rabinowiz, R, et al. Predicting first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Ratio of mean sac diameter to crown–rump length compared to embryonic heart rate. J Reprod Med 1994; 39: 459–62.Google Scholar

Nazari, A, Check, JH, Epstein, RH, Dietterich, C, Farzanfar, S. Relationship of small-for-dates sac size to crown–rump length and spontaneous abortion in patients with a known date of ovulation. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 369–73.Google Scholar

Dickey, RP, Olar, TT, Taylor, SN, Curole, DN, Matulich, EM. Relationship of small gestational sac-crown-rump length differences to abortion and abortus karyotypes. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 554–7.Google Scholar

Rowling, SE, Coleman, BG, Langer, JE, et al. First-trimester US parameters of failed pregnancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 211–17.Google Scholar

Shipp, TD, Bromley, B, Pauker, S, Frigoletto, FD, Benacerraf, BR. Outcome of singleton pregnancies with severe oligohydramnios in the second and third trimesters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 108–13.Google Scholar

Mercer, LJ, Brown, LG, Petres, RE, Messer, RH. A survey of pregnancies complicated by decreased amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 355–61.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 245–9.Google Scholar

Petrozella, LN, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Leveno, KJ. Clinical significance of borderline amniotic fluid index and oligohydramnios in preterm pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 338–42.Google Scholar

Rutherford, SE, Phelan, JP, Smith, CV, Jacobs, N. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 353–6.Google Scholar

Sarno, AP, Ahn, MO, Phelan, JP. Intrapartum amniotic fluid volume at term. Association of ruptured membranes, oligohydramnios and increased fetal risk. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 719–23.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Sanderson, M, Hendrix, NW, Magann, EF, Devoe, LD. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1473–8.Google Scholar

Phelan, JP. The postdate pregnancy: an overview. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1989; 32: 221–7.Google Scholar

Alchalabi, HA, Obeidat, BR, Jallad, MF, Khader, YS. Induction of labor and perinatal outcome: the impact of the amniotic fluid index. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 129: 124–7.Google Scholar

Ashwal, E, Hiersch, L, Melamed, N, et al. The association between isolated oligohydramnios at term and pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 875–81.Google Scholar

Zhang, J, Troendle, J, Meikle, S, Klebanoff, MA, Rayburn, WF. Isolated oligohydramnios is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. BJOG 2004; 111: 220–5.Google Scholar

Danon, D, Ben-Haroush, A, Yogev, Y, et al. Prostaglandin E2 induction of labor for isolated oligohydramnios in women with unfavorable cervix at term. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22: 75–9.Google Scholar

Driggers, RW, Holcroft, CJ, Blakemore, KJ, Graham, EM. An amniotic fluid index ≤ 5 cm within 7 days of delivery in the third trimester is not associated with decreasing umbilical arterial pH and base excess. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 72–6.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM. A review of amniotic fluid dynamics and the enigma of isolated oligohydramnios. Am J Perinatol 2002; 19: 253–66.Google Scholar

Conway, DL, Adkins, WB, Schroeder, B, Langer, O. Isolated oligohydramnios in the term pregnancy: is it a clinical entity? J Matern Fetal Med 1998; 7: 197–200.Google Scholar

Rainford, M, Adair, R, Scialli, AR, Ghidini, A, Spong, CY. Amniotic fluid index in the uncomplicated term pregnancy. Prediction of outcome. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 589–92.Google Scholar

Magann, EF, Kinsella, MJ, Chauhan, SP, et al. Does an amniotic fluid index of ≤ 5 cm necessitate delivery in high-risk pregnancies? A case–control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1354–9.Google Scholar

Magann, EF, Doherty, DA, Field, K, et al. Biophysical profile with amniotic fluid volume assessments. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 5–10.Google Scholar

Kreiser, D, el-Sayed, YY, Sorem, KA, et al. Decreased amniotic fluid index in low-risk pregnancy. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 743–6.Google Scholar

Elsandabesee, D, Majumdar, S, Sinha, S. Obstetricians’ attitudes towards “isolated” oligohydramnios at term. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27: 574–6.Google Scholar

Manzanares, S, Carrillo, MP, González-Perán, E, Puertas, A, Montoya, F. Isolated oligohydramnios in term pregnancy as an indication for induction of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20: 221–4.Google Scholar

Pryde, PG, Hallak, M, Lauria, MR, et al. Severe oligohydramnios with intact membranes: an indication for diagnostic amnioinfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther 2000; 15: 46–9.Google Scholar

Fisk, NM, Ronderos-Dumit, D, Soliani, A, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic transabdominal amnioinfusion in oligohydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 270–8.Google Scholar

Bienstock, JL, Birsner, ML, Coleman, F, Hueppchen, NA. Successful in utero intervention for bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 413–15.Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, GJ, Gülmezoglu, AM. Maternal hydration for increasing amniotic fluid volume in oligohydramnios and normal amniotic fluid volume. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (1): CD000134.Google Scholar

Golan, A, Wolman, I, Sagi, J, Yovel, I, David, MP. Persistence of polyhydramnios during pregnancy: its significance and correlation with maternal and fetal complications. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994; 37: 18–20.Google Scholar

Many, A, Hill, LM, Lazebnik, N, Martin, JG. The association between polyhydramnios and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 389–91.Google Scholar

Smith, CV, Plambeck, RD, Rayburn, WF, Albaugh, KJ. Relation of mild idiopathic polyhydramnios to perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 387–9.Google Scholar

Hill, LM, Breckle, R, Thomas, ML, Fries, JK. Polyhydramnios: ultrasonically detected prevalence and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 21–5.Google Scholar

Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Ramus, RM, Santos-Ramos, R, Twickler, DM. Hydramnios: anomaly prevalence and sonographic detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 134–9.Google Scholar

Thompson, O, Brown, R, Gunnarson, G, Harrington, K. Prevalence of polyhydramnios in the third trimester in a population screened by first and second trimester ultrasonography. J Perinat Med 1998; 26: 371–7.Google Scholar

Biggio, JR, Wenstrom, KD, Dubard, MB, Cliver, SP. Hydramnios prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 773–7.Google Scholar

Pri-Paz, S, Khalek, N, Fuchs, KM, Simpson, LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 648–53.Google Scholar

Ben-Chetrit, A, Hochner-Celnikier, D, Ron, M, Yagel, S. Hydramnios in the third trimester of pregnancy: a change in the distribution of accompanying fetal anomalies as a result of early ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1344–5.Google Scholar

Stoll, CG, Alembik, Y, Dott, B. Study of 156 cases of polyhydramnios and congenital malformations in a series of 118,265 consecutive births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 586–90.Google Scholar

Vink, JY, Poggi, SH, Ghidini, A, Spong, CY. Amniotic fluid index and birth weight: is there a relationship in diabetics with poor glycemic control? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 848–50.Google Scholar

Idris, N, Wong, SF, Thomae, M, Gardener, G, McIntyre, DH. Influence of polyhydramnios on perinatal outcome in pregestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 338–43.Google Scholar

Abele, H, Starz, S, Hoopmann, M, et al. Idiopathic polyhydramnios and postnatal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 32: 251–5.Google Scholar

Ross, MG, Brace, RA; National Institute of Child Health and Development Workshop Participants. National Institute of Child Health and Development Conference summary: amniotic fluid biology. Basic and clinical aspects. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10: 2–19.Google Scholar

Magann, EF, Chauhan, SP, Doherty, DA, et al. A review of idiopathic hydramnios and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62: 795–802.Google Scholar

Elliott, JP, Sawyer, AT, Radin, TG, Strong, RE. Large-volume therapeutic amniocentesis in the treatment of hydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 1025–7.Google Scholar

Cabrol, D, Landesman, R, Muller, J, et al. Treatment of polyhydramnios with prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor (indomethacin). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 422–6.Google Scholar

Hickok, DE, Hollenbach, KA, Reilley, SF, Nyberg, DA. The association between decreased amniotic fluid volume and treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents for preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1525–30.Google Scholar

Kirshon, B, Mari, G, Moise, KJ. Indomethacin therapy in the treatment of symptomatic polyhydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 202–5.Google Scholar

Fisk, NM, Tannirandorn, Y, Nicolini, U, Talbert, DG, Rodeck, CH. Amniotic pressure in disorders of amniotic fluid volume. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 210–14.Google Scholar

Leung, WC, Jouannic, JM, Hyett, J, Rodeck, C, Jauniaux, E. Procedure-related complications of rapid amniodrainage in the treatment of polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 154–8.Google Scholar

Kramer, WB, Van den Veyver, IB, Kirshon, B. Treatment of polyhydramnios with indomethacin. Clin Perinatol 1994; 21: 615–30.Google Scholar

Harman, CR. Amniotic fluid abnormalities. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 288–94.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ. Polyhydramnios. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 266–79.Google Scholar

Macones, GA, Marder, SJ, Clothier, B, Stamilio, DM. The controversy surrounding indomethacin for tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 264–72.Google Scholar

Norton, ME, Merrill, J, Cooper, BA, Kuller, JA, Clyman, RI. Neonatal complications after the administration of indomethacin for preterm labor. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1602–7.Google Scholar

Bennett, PR, Le Van Kim, C, Colin, Y, et al. Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type by DNA amplification. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 607–10.Google Scholar

Chown, B, Duff, AM, James, J, et al. Prevention of primary Rh immunization: First report of the Western Canadian Trial. Can Med J 1969; 100: 1021–47.Google Scholar

Harper, DC, Swingle, HM, Weiner, CP, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and brain volume after treatment for hydrops fetalis by in utero intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 192–200.Google Scholar

Liley, AW. Errors in the assessment of hemolytic disease from amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 86: 485–94.Google Scholar

Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al.; Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 9–14.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–4.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Pelzer, GD, Heilskov, J, et al. The effect of intravascular transfusion on umbilical venous pressure in anemic fetuses with and without hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 149E.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: ii. Outcome of treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1302–7.Google Scholar

Yankowitz, J, Li, S, Weiner, CP. Polymerase chain reaction determination of RhC, Rhc, and RhE blood types: an evaluation of accuracy and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1107–11.Google Scholar

Diamond, LK, Blackfan, KD, Baty, JM. Erythroblastosis fetalis and its association with universal edema of the fetus, icterus gravis neonatorum and anemia of the newborn. J Pediatr 1932; 1: 269–74.Google Scholar

Levine, P, Katzin, EM, Burnham, L. Isoimmunization in pregnancy: Its possible bearing on the etiology of erythroblastosis fetalis. JAMA 1941; 116: 825–30.Google Scholar

Chown, B. Anemia from bleeding of the fetus into the mother’s circulation. Lancet 1954; I: 1213–15.Google Scholar

Liley, AW. Liquor amnii analysis and management of pregnancy complicated by rhesus immunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 1359–68.Google Scholar

Liley, AW. Errors in the assessment of hemolytic disease from amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 86: 485–94.Google Scholar

Freda, VJ, Gorman, JG, Pollack, W. Successful prevention of experimental Rh sensitization in man with an anti-Rh gamma-2-globulin antibody preparation—A preliminary report. Transfusion 1964; 4: 26–31.Google Scholar

Rodeck, CH, Holman, CA, Karnicki, J, et al. Direct intravascular fetal blood transfusion by fetoscopy in severe rhesus isoimmunization. Lancet 1981; I: 652–4.Google Scholar

Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al.; Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 9–14.Google Scholar

Holzgreve, W, Gänshirt-Ahlert, D, Burschyk, M, et al. Detection of fetal DNA in maternal blood by PCR. Lancet 1990; 335: 1220–1.Google Scholar

Lo, YM, Patel, P, Wainscoat, JS, et al. Prenatal sex determination by DNA amplification from maternal peripheral blood. Lancet 1989; 2: 1363–5.Google Scholar

Mourant, AE, Kopec, AC, Domaniewska-Sobozak, K. The Distribution of Human Blood Groups and Other Polymophisms, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press, 1976, pp. 351–505.Google Scholar

Joseph, KS, Kramer, MS. The decline in Rh hemolytic disease: should Rh prophylaxis get all the credit? Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 209–15.Google Scholar

Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM, Penston, LE. Fetomaternal transplacental hemorrhage during pregnancy and after delivery. Vox Sang 1986; 51: 117–25.Google Scholar

Westhoff, CM. The structure and function of the Rh antigen complex. Semin Hematol 2007; 44: 42–50.Google Scholar

Ballas, S, Clark, MR, Mohandas, N, et al. Red cell membranes and cation deficiency in Rhnull syndrome. Blood 1984; 63: 1046–55.Google Scholar

Bruce, LJ, Ghosh, S, King, MJ, et al. Absence of CD47 in protein 4.2-deficient hereditary spherocytosis in man: An interaction between the Rh complex and the band 3 complex. Blood 2002; 100: 1878–85.Google Scholar

Dahl, KN, Parthasarathy, R, Westhoff, CM, et al. Protein 4.2 is critical to CD47-membrane skeleton attachment in human red cells. Blood 2004; 103: 1131–6.Google Scholar

Nicolas, V, Le Van Kim, C, Gane, P, et al. Rh-RhAG/ankyrin-R, a new interaction site between the membrane bilayer and the red cell skeleton, is impaired by Rh(null)-associated mutation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 25526–33.Google Scholar

Marini, AM, Matassi, G, Raynal, V, et al. The human Rhesus-associated RhAG protein and a kidney homologue promote ammonium transport in yeast. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 341–4.Google Scholar

Westhoff, CM, Ferreri-Jacobia, M, Mak, DOD, Foskett, JK. Identification of the erythrocyte Rh blood group glycoprotein as a mammalian ammonium transporter. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 12499–502.Google Scholar

Conroy, MJ, Bullough, PA, Merrick, M, Avent, ND. Modelling the human rhesus proteins: Implications for structure and function. Br J Haematol 2005; 131: 543–51.Google Scholar

Liu, Z, Chen, Y, Mo, R, et al. Characterization of human RhCG and mouse RhCG as novel nonerythroid Rh glycoprotein homologues predominantly expressed in kidney and testis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 25641–51.Google Scholar

Weiner, ID, Verlander, JW. Renal and hepatic expression of the ammonium transporter proteins, Rh B glycoprotein and Rh C glycoprotein. Acta Physiol Scand 2003; 179: 331–8.Google Scholar

Weiner, ID, Miller, RT, Verlander, JW. Localization of the ammonium transporters, Rh B glycoprotein and Rh C glycoprotein, in the mouse liver. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 1432–40.Google Scholar

Tippett, P, Sanger, R. Observations on subdivisions of the Rh antigen D. Vox Sang 1962; 7: 9–14.Google Scholar

Bowman, JM. Maternal alloimmunization and fetal hemolytic disease. In Reece, EA, Hobbins, JC, Mahoney, MJ, Petrie, RH (eds), Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1992, pp. 1152–82.Google Scholar

Knibll, W. Der gang der erythrophose beim menschlichen embryo. Acta Haematol 1949; 2: 369–77.Google Scholar

Palfi, M, Hilden, JO, Gottvall, T, Selbing, A. Placental transport of maternal immunoglobulin G in pregnancies at risk of Rh (D) hemolytic disease of the newborn. Am J Reprod Immunol 1998; 39: 323–8.Google Scholar

Hilden, JO, Gottvall, T, Lindblom, B. HLA phenotypes and severe Rh (D) immunization. Tissue Antigens 1995; 46: 313–15.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP. Human fetal bilirubin and fetal hemolytic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 116: 1449–54.Google Scholar

Soothill, PW, Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, et al. Relationship of fetal hemoglobin and oxygen content to lactate concentration in sensitized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 268–71.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Warenski, JC, Rodeck, CH. The relationship of fetal protein concentration and haemoglobin level to the development of hydrops in rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 341–4.Google Scholar

Phibbs, RH, Johnson, P, Tooley, WE. Cardio-respiratory status of erythroblastotic infants. II. Blood volume, hematocrit, and serum albumin concentration in relation to hydrops fetalis. Pediatrics 1974; 53: 13–26.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Heilskov, J, Pelzer, G, et al. Normal values for human umbilical venous and amniotic fluid pressures and their alteration by fetal disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 714–17.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: ii. Outcome of treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1302–7.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Pelzer, GD, Heilskov, J, et al. The effect of intravascular transfusion on umbilical venous pressure in anemic fetuses with and without hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 149E.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Sipes, SL, Wenstrom, KD. The effect of gestation upon normal fetal laboratory parameters and venous pressure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 713–18.Google Scholar

Lucas, GF, Hadley, AG, Nance, SJ, Garratty, G. Predicting hemolytic disease of the newborn: a comparison of the monocyte monolayer assay and the chemiluminescence test. Transfusion 1993; 33: 484–7.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ, Perkins, JT, Sosler, SD, et al. The predictive value of maternal serum testing for detection of fetal anemia in red blood cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1003–9.Google Scholar

Buggins, AG, Thilaganathan, B, Hambley, H, Nicolaides, KH. Predicting the severity of rhesus alloimmunization: monocyte-mediated chemiluminescence versus maternal anti-D antibody estimation. Br J Haematol 1994; 88: 199–200.Google Scholar

Gordon, LG, Hyland, CA, Hyett, JA, et al. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping of RhD negative pregnant women for targeted anti-D therapy in Australia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 1245–53. doi: 10.1002/pd.5176.Google Scholar

Abbey, R, Dunsmoor-Su, R. Cost–benefit analysis of indirect antiglobulin screening in Rh(D)-negative women at 28 weeks gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 938–45.Google Scholar

Bowman, JM, Chown, B, Lewis, M, Pollock, JM. Rh isoimmunization during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis. Can Med Assoc J 1978; 118: 623–7.Google Scholar

Chilcott, J, Tappenden, P, Lloyd Jones, M, et al. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative. BJOG 2004; 111: 903–7.Google Scholar

Bowman, JM, Pollack, JM. Transplacental fetal hemorrhage after amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 749–55.Google Scholar

Chown, B, Duff, AM, James, J, et al. Prevention of primary Rh immunization: first report of the Western Canadian Trial. Can Med J 1969; 100: 1021–47.Google Scholar

Pollack, W, Ascari, WQ, Kochesky, RJ, et al. Studies on Rh prophylaxis. I. Relationship between doses of anti-Rh and the size of the antigenic stimulus. Transfusion 1971; 11: 333–9.Google Scholar

Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM. Amniotic fluid spectrophotometry and early delivery in the management of erythroblastosis fetalis. Pediatrics 1965; 35: 815–21.Google Scholar

LeVanKim, C, Mouro, I, Brossard, Y, et al. PCR-based determination of Rhc and RhE status of fetuses at risk of Rhc and RhE haemolytic disease. Br J Haematol 1994; 88: 193–5.Google Scholar

Bennett, PR, Le Van Kim, C, Colin, Y, et al. Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type by DNA amplification. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 607–10.Google Scholar

Van den Veyver, IB, Subramanian, SB, Hudson, KM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of the RhD fetal blood type on amniotic fluid by polymerase chain reaction. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 419–22.Google Scholar

Fisk, NM, Bennett, P, Warwick, RM, et al. Clinical utility of fetal RhD typing in alloimmunized pregnancies by means of polymerase chain reaction on amniocytes or chorionic villi. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 50–4.Google Scholar

Yankowitz, J, Li, S, Weiner, CP. Polymerase chain reaction determination of RhC, Rhc, and RhE blood types: an evaluation of accuracy and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1107–11.Google Scholar

Geifman-Holtzman, O, Grotegut, CA, Gaughan, JP. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1163–73.Google Scholar

Geifman-Holtzman, O, Grotegut, CA, Gaughan, JP, et al. Noninvasive fetal RhCE genotyping from maternal blood. BJOG 2009; 116: 144–51.Google Scholar

Szczepura, A, Osipenko, L, Freeman, K. A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 5.Google Scholar

Brass, LM, Pavlakis, SG, DeVivo, D, et al. Transcranial Doppler measurements of the middle cerebral artery. Effect of hematocrit Stroke 1988; 19: 1466–9.Google Scholar

Vyas, S, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler examination of the middle cerebral artery in anemic fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1066–8.Google Scholar

Mari, G, Adrignolo, A, Abuhamad, AZ, et al. Diagnosis of fetal anemia with Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy complicated by maternal blood group immunization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 400–5.Google Scholar

Steiner, H, Schaffer, H, Spitzer, D, et al. The relationship between peak velocity in the fetal descending aorta and hematocrit in rhesus isoimmunization. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 659–62.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Campbell, WA, Storlazzi, E, et al. Fetal liver ultrasound measurements in isoimmunized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 162.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Fontanarosa, M, Gabbe, SG, Rodeck, CH. Failure of six ultrasonographic parameters to predict the severity of fetal anemia in Rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 920–6.Google Scholar

Frigoletto, FD, Greene, MF, Benacerraf, BR, et al. Ultramonographic fetal surveillance in the management of the isoimmunized pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 430–2.Google Scholar

Gottval, T, Hilden, JO. Concentration of anti-D antibodies in Rh(D) alloimmunized pregnant women, as a predictor of anemia and/or hyperbilirubinemia in their newborn infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 733–8.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Widness, JA. Decreased fetal erythropoiesis and hemolysis in Kell hemolytic anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 547–51.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, RL, Beyth, Y, Sadovsky, E. Death in utero due to Kell sensitization without excessive elevation of the delta OD450 value in amniotic fluid. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 746–9.Google Scholar

Vaughan, JI, Warwick, R, Letsky, E, et al. Erythropoietic suppression in fetal anemia because of Kell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 247–52.Google Scholar

Vaughan, JI, Manning, M, Warick, RM, et al. Inhibition of erythroid progenitor cells by anti-Kell antibodies in fetal alloimmune anemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 798–803.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–4.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Wenstrom, KD, Sipes, SL, Williamson, RA. Risk factors for cordocentesis and fetal intravascular transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1020–3.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Okamura, K. Diagnostic fetal blood sampling: technique related losses. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 169–75.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Grant, SS, Hudson, J, et al. Effect of diagnostic and therapeutic cordocentesis upon maternal serum alpha fetoprotein concentration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 706–8.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: outcome of affected neonates not requiring transfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 176–8.Google Scholar

Graham-Pole, J, Barr, W, Willoughby, ML. Continuous-flow plasmapheresis management of severe rhesus disease. BMJ 1977; 1: 1185–8.Google Scholar

Berlin, G, Selbing, A, Ryden, G. Rhesus haemolytic disease treated with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Lancet 1985; I: 1153.Google Scholar

Zwiers, C, van der Bom, JG, van Kamp, IL, et al. Postponing Early intrauterine Transfusion with Intravenous immunoglobulin Treatment: the PETIT study on severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 291.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.007.Google Scholar

Zhao, L, Huang, X, Wang, Q. Antenatal treatment of maternal fetal Rh incompatibility hemolysis disease. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 1998; 33: 406–8.Google Scholar

Huizing, K, Roislien, J, Hansen, T. Intravenous immune globulin reduces the need for exchange transfusions in Rhesus and ABO incompatibility. Acta Paediatrica 2008; 97: 1362–5.Google Scholar

Fox, C, Martin, W, Somerset, DA, et al. Early intraperitoneal transfusion and adjuvant maternal immunoglobulin therapy in the treatment of severe red cell alloimmunization prior to fetal intravascular transfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23: 159–63.Google Scholar

Ruma, MS, Moise, KJ, Kim, E, et al. Combined plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of severe maternal red cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 138.e1–6.Google Scholar

Voto, LS, Mathet, ER, Zapaterio, JL, et al. High-dose gammaglobulin (IVIG) followed by intrauterine transfusions (IUTs): a new alternative for the treatment of severe fetal hemolytic disease. J Perinat Med 1997; 25: 85–8.Google Scholar

Deka, D, Buckshee, K, Kinra, G. Intravenous immunoglobulin as primary therapy or adjuvant therapy to intrauterine fetal blood transfusion: a new approach in the management of severe Rh-immunization. J Obstet Gynecol Res 1996; 22: 561–7.Google Scholar

Watts, DH, Luthy, DA, Benedetti, TJ, et al. Intraperitoneal fetal transfusion under direct ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 84–8.Google Scholar

Frigoletto, FD, Umansky, I, Birnholz, J, et al. Intrauterine fetal transfusion in 365 fetuses during fifteen years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 781–6.Google Scholar

Harman, CR, Bowman, JM, Manning, FA, Menticoglou, SM. Intrauterine transfusion: intraperitoneal versus intravascular approach. A case–control comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1053–9.Google Scholar

Chestnut, DH, Pollack, KL, Weiner, CP, et al. Does furosemide alter the hemodynamic response to rapid intravascular transfusion of the anemic fetal lamb? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1571–5.Google Scholar

Egberts, J, van Kamp, IL, Kanhai, HH, et al. The disappearance of fetal and donor red blood cells in alloimmunized pregnancies: A reappraisal. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 818–24.Google Scholar

Robillard, JE, Weiner, CP. Atrial natriuretic factor in the human fetus effect of volume expansion. Pediatrics 1988; 113: 552–5.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Robillard, JE. Arginine vasopressin and acute, intravascular volume expansion in the human fetus. Fetal Ther 1989; 4: 69–72.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP, Robillard, JE. Effect of acute intravascular volume expansion upon human fetal prostaglandin concentrations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1494–7.Google Scholar

Ovali, F, Samanci, N, Dagoglu, T. Management of late anemia in Rhesus hemolytic disease: use of recombinant human erythropoietin (a pilot study). Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 831–4.Google Scholar

Ellis, MI. Follow-up study of survivors after intrauterine transfusion. Dev Med Child Neurol 1980; 22: 48–54.Google Scholar

White, CA, Goplerud, CP, Kisker, CT, et al. Intrauterine fetal transfusion, 1965–1976, with an assessment of the surviving children. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 933–42.Google Scholar

Harper, DC, Swingle, HM, Weiner, CP, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and brain volume after treatment for hydrops fetalis by in utero intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 192–200.Google Scholar

Sola-Visner, M, Saxonhouse, MA, Brown, RE. Neonatal thrombocytopenia: what we do and don’t know. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 499–506.Google Scholar

Kamphuis, MM, Paridaans, N, Porcelijn, L, et al. Screening in pregnancy for fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: systematic review. BJOG 2010; 117: 1335–43.Google Scholar

Chakravorty, S, Roberts, I. How I manage neonatal thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 155–62.Google Scholar

Kaplan, C. Platelet alloimmunity: the fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Vox Sang 2002; 83 (Suppl 1): 289–91.Google Scholar

Warwick, RM, Vaughan, J, Murray, N, Lubenko, A, Roberts, I. In vitro culture of colony forming unit-megakaryocyte (CFU-MK) in fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 1994; 88: 874–7.Google Scholar

Spencer, JA, Burrows, RF. Feto-maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a literature review and statistical analysis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 45–55.Google Scholar

Killie, MK, Husebekk, A, Kjeldsen-Kragh, J, Skogen, B. A prospective study of maternal anti-HPA 1a antibody level as a potential predictor of alloimmune thrombocytopenia in the newborn. Haematologica 2008; 93: 870–7.Google Scholar

Kamphuis, MM, Paridaans, NP, Porcelijn, L, Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D. Incidence and consequences of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2014; 133: 715–21.Google Scholar

Gaddipati, S, Berkowitz, RL, Lembet, AA, et al. Initial fetal platelet counts predict the response to intravenous gammaglobulin therapy in fetuses that are affected by PLA1 incompatibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 976–80.Google Scholar

Birchall, JE, Murphy, MF, Kaplan, C, Kroll, H; European Fetomaternal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia Study Group. European collaborative study of the antenatal management of feto–maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2003; 122: 275–88.Google Scholar

Yougbare, I, Lang, S, Yang, H, et al. Maternal anti-platelet beta3integrins impair angiogenesis and cause intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Invest 2015; 125: 1545–56.Google Scholar

Santoso, S, Wihadmadyatami, H, Bakchoul, T, et al. Antiendothelial αvβ3 antibodies are a major cause of intracranial bleeding in fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016; 36: 1517–24. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307281.Google Scholar

Bussel, JB, Zabusky, MR, Berkowitz, RL, McFarland, JG. Fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 22–6.Google Scholar

Kaplan, C, Murphy, MF, Kroll, H, Waters, AH. Feto-maternal alloimmunethrombocytopenia: antenatal therapy with IvIG and steroids –more questions than answers. European Working Group on FMAIT. Br J Haematol 1998; 100: 62–5.Google Scholar

Scheffer, PG, Ait Soussan, A, Verhagen, OJ, et al. Noninvasive fetal genotyping of human platelet antigen-1a. BJOG 2011; 118: 1392–5.Google Scholar

Kamphuis, MM, Oepkes, D. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: prenatal interventions. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 712–19.Google Scholar

Pacheco, LD, Berkowitz, RL, Moise, KJ, et al. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a management algorithm based on risk stratification. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1157–63.Google Scholar

Hansen, RJ, Balthasar, JP. Intravenous immunoglobulin mediates an increase in anti-platelet antibody clearance via the FcRn receptor. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 898–9.Google Scholar

Paridaans, NP, Kamphuis, MM, Taune Wikman, A, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent fetal intracranial hemorrhage in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 38: 147–53.Google Scholar

Kamphuis, MM, Paridaans, NP, Wikman, A, et al. Lower dose intravenous immunoglobulins for the treatment of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a cohort study. Tranfusion 2016; 56: 2308–13.Google Scholar

Winkelhorst, D, Murphy, MF, Greinacher, A, et al. Antenatal management in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review. Blood 2017; 129: 1538–47. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-739656.Google Scholar

van den Akker, ES, Oepkes, D, Lopriore, E, Kanhai, HH. Noninvasive antenatal management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: safe and effective. BJOG 2007; 14: 469–73.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, RL, Lesser, ML, McFarland, JG, et al. Antepartum treatment without early cordocentesis for standard-risk alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 249–55.Google Scholar

van den Akker, E, Oepkes, D, Brand, A, Kanhai, HH. Vaginal delivery for fetuses at risk of alloimmune thrombocytopenia? BJOG 2006; 113: 781–3.Google Scholar

te Pas, AB, Lopriore, E, van den Akker, ES, et al. Postnatal management of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: the role of matched platelet transfusion and IVIG. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 1057–63.Google Scholar

Van Der Lugt, NM, Kamphuis, MM, Paridaans, NP, et al. Neonatal outcome in alloimmune thrombocytopenia after maternal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. Blood Transfus 2015; 13: 66–71.Google Scholar

Kjeldsen-Kragh, J, Husebekk, A, Killie, MK, Skogen, B. Is it time to include screening for neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in the general antenatal health program? Transfus Apher Sci 2008; 38: 183–8.Google Scholar

Kjeldsen-Kragh, J, Skogen, B. Mechanisms and Prevention of Alloimmunization in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68: 526–32Google Scholar

Care, A, Pavord, S, Knight, M, Alfirevic, Z. Severe primary autoimmune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a national cohort study. BJOG 2018; 125: 604–12. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14697.Google Scholar

Gernsheimer, T, McCrae, KR. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Curr Opin Hematol 2007; 14: 574–80.Google Scholar

Sainio, S, Joutsi, L, Jarvenpaa, AL, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 272–7.Google Scholar

Samuels, P, Bussel, JB, Braitman, LE, et al. Estimation of the risk of thrombocytopenia in the offspring of pregnant women with presumed immune thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 229–35.Google Scholar

Fujimura, K, Harada, Y, Fujimoto, T, et al. Nationwide study of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnant women and the clinical influence on neonates. Int J Hematol 2002; 75: 426–33.Google Scholar

Koyama, S, Tomimatsu, T, Kanagawa, T,et al. Reliable predictors of neonatal immune thrombocytopenia in pregnant women with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 15–21.Google Scholar

Hachisuga, K, Hidaka, N, Fujita, Y, Fukushima, K, Kato, K. Can we predict neonatal thrombocytopenia in offspring of women with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura? Blood Res 2014; 49: 259–64.Google Scholar

Payne, SD, Resnik, R, Moore, TR, et al. Maternal characteristics and risk of severe neonatal thrombocytopenia and intracranial hemorrhage in pregnancies complicated by auto immune thrombocytopenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 149–55.Google Scholar

Cines, DB, Bussel, JB. How I treat idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Blood 2005; 106: 2244–51.Google Scholar

Calderwood, C. Thromboembolism and thrombophilia in pregnancy. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 16: 321–6.Google Scholar

Kelton, JG. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura complicating pregnancy. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 43–6.Google Scholar

Gernsheimer, T, James, AH, Stasi, R. How I treat thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood 2013; 121: 38–47.Google Scholar

Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines for the investigation and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults, children and pregnancy. Br J Haematol 2003; 120: 574–96.Google Scholar

George, JN, Woolf, SH, Raskob, GE, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: A practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society. Blood 1996; 88: 3–40.Google Scholar

Provan, D, Stasi, R, Newland, AC, et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010; 115: 168–86Google Scholar

Sun, D, Shehata, N, Ye, XY, et al. Corticosteroids compared with intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood 2016; 128: 1329–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-04-710285.Google Scholar

Kong, Z, Qin, P, Xiao, S, et al. A novel recombinant human thrombopoietin therapy for the management of immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood 2017; 130: 1097–103.Google Scholar

Choi, S, Brull, R. Neuraxial techniques in obstetric and non-obstetric patients with common bleeding diatheses. Anesth Analg 2009; 1092: 648–60.Google Scholar

van Veen, JJ, Nokes, TJ, Makris, M. The risk of spinal haematoma following neuraxial anaesthesia. Br J Haematol 2010; 1481: 15–25.Google Scholar

Bakchoul, T, Bassler, D, Heckmann, M, et al. Management of infants born with severe neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: the role of platelet transfusions and intravenous immunoglobulin. Transfusion 2014; 54: 640–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12336.Google Scholar

Pass, RF, Fowler, KB, Boppana, SB, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection following first trimester maternal infection: symptoms at birth and outcome. J ClinVirol 2006; 35: 216–20Google Scholar

Boppana, SB, Pass, RF, Britt, WJ, et al. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11: 93–9.Google Scholar

Ortiz, JU, Ostermayer, E, Fischer, T, et al. Severe fetal cytomegalovirus infection associated with cerebellar hemorrhage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 402–6.Google Scholar

Hohlfeld, P, Forestier, F, Kaplan, C, et al. Fetal thrombocytopenia: a retrospective survey of 5,194 fetal blood samplings. Blood 1994; 84: 1851–6.Google Scholar

Segata, M, Chaoui, R, Khalek, N, et al. Fetal thrombocytopenia secondary to parvovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 61.e1–4.Google Scholar

de Haan, TR, van den Akker, ES, Porcelijn, L, et al. Thrombocytopenia in hydropic fetuses with parvovirus B19 infection: incidence, treatment and correlation with fetal B19 viral load. BJOG 2008; 115: 76–81.Google Scholar

van den Akker, ES, de Haan, TR, Lopriore, E, et al. Severe fetal thrombocytopenia in Rhesus D alloimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 387.e1–4.Google Scholar

van den Akker, ES, Klumper, FJ, Brand, A, et al. Kell alloimmunization in pregnancy: associated with fetal thrombocytopenia? Vox Sang 2008; 95: 66–9.Google Scholar

Van Kamp, IL, Klumper, FJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Complications of intrauterine intravascular transfusion for fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 171–7.Google Scholar

Hohlfeld, P, Forestier, F, Vial, Y, Tissot, JD. Hematological features of fetal triploidy: A report of 11 cases. Biol Neonate 1997; 72: 279–83.Google Scholar

Henry, E, Walker, D, Wiedmeier, SE, Christensen, RD. Hematological abnormalities during the first week of life among neonates with Down syndrome: Data from a multihospital healthcare system. Am J Med Genet 2007; 143: 42–50.Google Scholar

Wiedmeier, SE, Henry, E, Christensen, RD: Hematological abnormalities during the first week of life among neonates with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: data from a multi-hospital healthcare system. Am J Med Genet 2008; 146: 312–20.Google Scholar

Watts, TL, Roberts, IAG. Haematological abnormalities in the growth-restricted infant. Semin Neonatol 1999; 4: 41–54.Google Scholar

Tunstall-Pedoe, O, de la Fuente, J, Bennett, PR, et al. Trisomy 21 expands the megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor compartment in human fetal liver: implications for Down syndrome AMKL. Blood 2006; 108: 170a.Google Scholar

Roberts, I, Stanworth, S, Murray, NA. Thrombocytopenia in the neonate. Blood Rev 2008; 22: 173–86.Google Scholar

Geddis, AE. Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia with absent radii. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2009; 23: 321–31.Google Scholar

López, JA, Andrews, RK, Afshar-Kharghan, V, Berndt, MC. Bernard–Soulier syndrome. Blood 1998; 91: 4397–418.Google Scholar

Fujimori, K, Ohto, H, Honda, S, Sato, A. Antepartum diagnosis of fetal intracranial hemorrhage due to maternal Bernard–Soulier syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 817–19.Google Scholar

Aronson, I, Du Toit, JM, Jacobs, P: Grey platelet syndrome. Lancet 1994; 344: 1233–4.Google Scholar

Jimenez-Rivera, C, Gupta, A, Feberova, J, de Nanassy, JA, Boland, MP. Successful treatment of neonatal hemochromatosis as gestational alloimmune liver disease with intravenous immunoglobulin. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2014; 7: 301–4.Google Scholar

Holmberg, L, Gustavii, B, Jönsson, A. A prenatal study of fetal platelet count and size with application to fetus at risk for Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome. J Pediatr 1983; 102: 773–6.Google Scholar

Krishnamurti, L, Neglia, JP, Nagarajan, R, et al. Paris–Trousseau syndrome platelets in a child with Jacobsen’s syndrome. Am J Hematol 2001; 66: 295–9.Google Scholar

Drachman, JG. Inherited thrombocytopenia: when a low platelet count does not mean ITP. Blood 2004; 103: 390–8.Google Scholar

Overton, TG, Duncan, KR, Jolly, M, et al. Serial aggressive platelet transfusion for fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: platelet dynamics and perinatal out-come. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 826–31.Google Scholar

Madani, K, Kamphuis, MM, Lopriore, E, Porcelijn, L, Oepkes, D. Delayed diagnosis of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. BJOG 2012; 119: 1612–16.Google Scholar

Wisser, J, Dirschedl, P. Embryonic heart rate in dated human embryos. Early Hum Dev 1994; 37: 107–15.Google Scholar

Southall, DP, Richards, J, Hardwick, RA, et al. Prospective study of fetal heart rate and rhythm patterns. Arch Dis Child 1980; 55: 506–11.Google Scholar

Reed, KL. Fetal arrhythmias: etiology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. Semin Perinatol 1989; 13: 294–304.Google Scholar

Donofrio, MT, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 2183–242.Google Scholar

Schmidt, KG, Ulmer, HE, Silverman, NH, Kleinman, CS, Copel, JA. Perinatal outcome of fetal complete atrioventricular block: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 1360–6.Google Scholar

Strasburger, JF, Huhta, JC, Carpenter, RJ, Garson, A, McNamara, DG. Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of persistent fetal arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 1386–91.Google Scholar

Nii, M, Hamilton, RM, Fenwick, L, et al. Assessment of fetal atrioventricular time intervals by tissue Doppler and pulse Doppler echocardiography: normal values and correlation with fetal electrocardiography. Heart 2006; 92: 1831–7.Google Scholar

Carvalho, JS, Prefumo, F, Ciardelli, V, et al. Evaluation of fetal arrhythmias from simultaneous pulsed wave Doppler in pulmonary artery and vein. Heart 2007; 93: 1448–53.Google Scholar

Berg, C, Geipel, A, Gembruch, U. Spectral Doppler imaging of the renal vessels facilitates the assessment of fetal arrhythmias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 367–8.Google Scholar

Rein, AJJT, O’Donnell, C, Geva, T, et al. Use of tissue velocity imaging in the diagnosis of fetal cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation 2002; 106: 1827–33.Google Scholar

Taylor, MJO, Smith, MJ, Thomas, M, et al. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography in singleton and multiple pregnancies. BJOG 2003; 110: 668–78.Google Scholar

Pasquini, L, Seale, AN, Belmar, C, et al. PR interval: a comparison of electrical and mechanical methods in the fetus. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 231–7.Google Scholar

Strasburger, JF, Cheulkar, B, Wakai, RT. Magnetocardiography for fetal arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5: 1073–6.Google Scholar

Van Hare, GF. Magnetocardiography in the diagnosis of fetal arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 1199–200.Google Scholar

American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association. Methodology Manual and Policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, 2010. http://assets.cardiosource.com/Methodology_Manual_for_ACC_AHA_Writing_Committees.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Simpson, JM, Yates, RW, Sharland, GK. Irregular heart rate in the fetus: not always benign. Cardiol Young 2008; 6: 28–31.Google Scholar

Api, O, Carvalho, JS. Fetal dysrhythmias. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22: 31–48.Google Scholar

Van Engelen, AD, Weijtens, O, Brenner, JI, et al. Management outcome and follow-up of fetal tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1371–5.Google Scholar

Skinner, JR, Sharland, G. Detection and management of life threatening arrhythmias in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 161–72.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, ET, Nii, M. Fetal brady- and tachyarrhythmias: new and accepted diagnostic and treatment methods. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 504–14.Google Scholar

Maxwell, DJ, Crawford, DC, Curry, PV, Tynan, MJ, Allan, LD. Obstetric importance, diagnosis, and management of fetal tachycardias. BMJ 1988; 297: 107–10.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, ET, Carvalho, JS, De Groot, E, et al. Comparison of transplacental treatment of fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with digoxin, flecainide, and sotalol: results of a nonrandomized multicenter study. Circulation 2011; 124: 1747–54.Google Scholar

Mangione, R, Guyon, F, Vergnaud, A, et al. Successful treatment of refractory supraventricular tachycardia by repeat intravascular injection of amiodarone in a fetus with hydrops. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 86: 105–7.Google Scholar

Krapp, M, Kohl, T, Simpson, JM, et al. Review of diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of fetal atrial flutter compared with supraventricular tachycardia. Heart 2003; 89: 913–17.Google Scholar

Shah, A, Moon-Grady, A, Bhogal, N, Collins, KK, Tacy, T, Brook, M, Hornberger, LK. Effectiveness of sotalol as first-line therapy for fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 1614–18.Google Scholar

Hahurij, ND, Blom, NA, Lopriore, E, et al. Perinatal management and long-term cardiac outcome in fetal arrhythmia. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 83–7.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, E, Fouron, JC, Drblik, SP. Fetal atrial flutter: diagnosis, clinical features, treatment, and outcome. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 335–9.Google Scholar

Wladimiroff, JW, Stewart, PA, Tonge, HM. Fetal bradyarrhythmia: diagnosis and outcome. Prenat Diagn 1988; 8: 53–7.Google Scholar

Ho, SY, Fagg, N, Anderson, RH, Cook, A, Allan, L. Disposition of the atrioventricular conduction tissues in the heart with isomerism of the atrial appendages: its relation to congenital complete heart block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 904–10.Google Scholar

Brucato, A, Frassi, M, Franceschini, F, et al. Risk of congenital complete heart block in newborns of mothers with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies detected by counter immunoelectrophoresis: a prospective study of 100 women. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 1832–5.Google Scholar

Friedman, DM, Kim, MY, Copel, JA, et al. Utility of cardiac monitoring in fetuses at risk for congenital heart block: the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) prospective study. Circulation 2008; 117: 485–93.Google Scholar

Taylor, P V, Scott, JS, Gerlis, LM, Esscher, E, Scott, O. Maternal antibodies against fetal cardiac antigens in congenital complete heart block. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 667–72.Google Scholar

Ho, SY, Esscher, E, Anderson, RH, Michaëlsson, M. Anatomy of congenital complete heart block and relation to maternal anti-Ro antibodies. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 291–4.Google Scholar

Sonesson, SE, Salomonsson, S, Jacobsson, LA, Bremme, K, Wahren-Herlenius, M. Signs of first-degree heart block occur in one-third of fetuses of pregnant women with anti-SSA/Ro 52-kd antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 1253–61.Google Scholar

Breur, JMPJ, Visser, GHA, Kruize, AA, Stoutenbeek, P, Meijboom, EJ. Treatment of fetal heart block with maternal steroid therapy: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 467–72.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, ET, Fouron, JC, Silverman, ED, et al. Transplacental fetal treatment improves the outcome of prenatally diagnosed complete atrioventricular block without structural heart disease. Circulation 2004; 110: 1542–8.Google Scholar

Eliasson, H, Sonesson, SE, Sharland, G, et al. Isolated atrioventricular block in the fetus: a retrospective, multinational, multicenter study of 175 patients. Circulation 2011; 124: 1919–26.Google Scholar

Friedman, DM, Kim, MY, Copel, JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of fetuses with autoimmune-associated congenital heart block followed in the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Study. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1102–6.Google Scholar

Cuneo, BF, Zhao, H, Strasburger, JF, et al. Atrial and ventricular rate response and patterns of heart rate acceleration during maternal-fetal terbutaline treatment of fetal complete heart block. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 661–5.Google Scholar

Hutter, D, Silverman, ED, Jaeggi, ET. The benefits of transplacental treatment of isolated congenital complete heart block associated with maternal anti-Ro/SSA antibodies: a review. Scand J Immunol 2010; 72: 235–41.Google Scholar

Trucco, SM, Jaeggi, E, Cuneo, B, et al. Use of intravenous gamma globulin and corticosteroids in the treatment of maternal autoantibody-mediated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 715–23.Google Scholar

Zhou, L, Chmait, R, Bar-Cohen, Y, Peck, RA, Loeb, GE. Percutaneously injectable fetal pacemaker: electrodes, mechanical design and implantation. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 2012; 2012: 6600–3.Google Scholar

Loeb, GE, Zhou, L, Zheng, K, et al. Design and testing of a percutaneously implantable fetal pacemaker. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41: 17–27.Google Scholar

Walkinshaw, SA, Welch, CR, McCormack, J, Walsh, K. In utero pacing for fetal congenital heart block. Fetal Diagn Ther 1994; 9: 183–5.Google Scholar

Carpenter, RJ, Strasburger, JF, Garson, A, Smith, RT, Deter, RL, Engelhardt, HT. Fetal ventricular pacing for hydrops secondary to complete atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8: 1434–6.Google Scholar

Moodley, S, Sanatani, S, Potts, JE, Sandor, GGS. Postnatal outcome in patients with fetal tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 34: 81–7.Google Scholar

Hornberger, LK, Sahn, DJ. Rhythm abnormalities of the fetus. Heart 2007; 93: 1294–300.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, ET, Hornberger, LK, Smallhorn, JF, Fouron, JC. Prenatal diagnosis of complete atrioventricular block associated with structural heart disease: combined experience of two tertiary care centers and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 16–21.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Aziz, MI, Nagel, HT, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after fetal arrhythmia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 46.e1–5.Google Scholar

Tegnander, E, Williams, W, Johanses, OJ, et al. prenatal detection of heart defect in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses: detection rates and outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 252–65.Google Scholar

Hoffman, JIE, Christianson, R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow up. Am J Cardiol 1978; 42: 641–7.Google Scholar

Woodrow, BD. The genetics of congenital heart disease: a point of revolution. Cardiol Clin 2002; 20: 385–94.Google Scholar

International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho, JS, Allan, LD, Chaoui, R, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 348–59.Google Scholar

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1083–101.Google Scholar

Van der Linde, D, Konings, EE, Slager, MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241–7.Google Scholar

Allan, LD. Echocardiographic detection of congenital heart disease in the fetus: present and future. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 103–6.Google Scholar

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med 2013: 32: 1067–82.Google Scholar

Rowland, TW, Hubbell, JP, Nadas, AS. Congenital heart disease in infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 1973; 83: 815–20.Google Scholar

Cedegren, MI, Kallen, AJ. Maternal obesity and infant heart defects. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1065–71.Google Scholar

Shields, LE, Gan, EA, Murphy, HF, Sahn, DJ, Moore, TR. The prognostic value of hemoglobin A1c in predicting fetal heart disease in diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 954–7.Google Scholar

Levy, HL, Waisbren, SE. Effects of untreated maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia on the fetus. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1269–74.Google Scholar

Lenke, RL, Levy, HL. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia: an international survey of the outcome of untreated and treated pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 1202–8.Google Scholar

Jones, KI, Smith, DW, Ulleland, CN, Streissguth, P. Pattern of malformation in offspring of alcoholic mothers. Lancet 1973; 1: 1267–71.Google Scholar

Koivurova, S, Hartikainen, AL, Gissler, M, et al. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002; 5: 1391–8.Google Scholar

Kurinczuk, JJ, Bower, C. Birth defects in infants conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an alternative interpretation. Br Med J 1997; 315: 1260–6.Google Scholar

Copel, JA, Pilu, G, Kleinman, CS. Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: association and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 1121–32.Google Scholar

Bahado-Singh, RO, Wapner, R, Thom, E, et al. Elevated first trimester nuchal translucency increases the risk of congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1357–61.Google Scholar

Manning, N, Archer, N. A study to determine the incidence of structural congenital heart disease in monochorionic twins. Prenat Diag 2006; 11: 1062–4.Google Scholar

Copel, JA, Cullen, M, Green, JJ, et al. The frequency of aneuploidy in prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: an indication for fetal karyotyping. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 409–13.Google Scholar

Ferencz, C, Neill, CA, Boughman, JA, et al. Congenital cardiac malformation associated with chromosome abnormalities; an epidemiologic study. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 79–86.Google Scholar

Hook, EB. Chromosome abnormalities and spontaneous fetal death following amniocentesis: further data and association with maternal age. Am J Hum Genet 1983; 35: 110–16.Google Scholar

Harris, JA, Francannet, C, Pradat, P, Robert, E. The epidemiology of cardiovascular defects, part 2: a study based on data from three large registries of congenital malformations. Pediatr Cardiol 2003; 24: 222–35.Google Scholar

Chaoui, R, Kalache, KD, Heling, KS, et al. Absent or hypoplastic thymus on ultrasound; a marker for deletion 22q11 in fetal cardiac defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 546–52.Google Scholar

Manning, N, Kaufman, L, Roberts, P. Genetics of cardiological disorders. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 259–69.Google Scholar

Menashe, M, Arbel, R, Raveh, D, Achiron, R, Yagel, S. Poor prenatal detection rate of cardiac anomalies in Noonan syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19; 51–5.Google Scholar

Kratz, ID, Piccoli, DA, Spinner, NB. Alagille syndrome. J Med Genet 1997; 34: 152–7.Google Scholar

Basson, CT, Cowley, GS, Solomon, SD, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of the Holt–Oram syndrome: heart–hand syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 885–91.Google Scholar

Souka, AP, Pilalis, A, Kavalakis, Y, et al. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11–14 week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 24: 730–4.Google Scholar

Hyett, J, Perdu, M, Sharland, G, Snijders, R, Nicolaides, KH. Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10–14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ 1999; 318: 81–5.Google Scholar

Schwarzler, P, Carvalho, JS, Senat, MV, et al. Screening for fetal aneuploidies and fetal cardiac abnormalities by nuchal translucency thickness measurement at 10–14 weeks of gestation as part of routine antenatal care in an unselected population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 1029–34.Google Scholar

Timmerman, E, Clur, SA, Pajkrt, E, Bilardo, CM. First-trimester measurement of the ductus venosus pulsatility index and the prediction of congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 668–75.Google Scholar

Borrell, A, Grande, M, Bennasar, M, et al. First-trimester detection of major cardiac defects with the use of ductus venosus blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 51–7.Google Scholar

Pereira, S, Ganapathy, R, Syngelaki, A, Maiz, N, Nicolaides, KH. Contribution of fetal tricuspid regurgitation in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1384–91.Google Scholar

Chelemen, T, Syngelaki, A, Maiz, N, Allan, L, Nicolaides, KH. Contribution of ductus venosus Doppler in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 127–34.Google Scholar

Martínez, JM, Comas, M, Borrell, A, et al. Abnormal first-trimester ductus venosus blood flow: a marker of cardiac defects in fetuses with normal karyotype and nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 267–72.Google Scholar

Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 102–13.Google Scholar

Sinkovskaya, E, Horton, S, Berkley, EM, et al. Defining the fetal cardiac axis between 11 + 0 and 14 + 6 weeks of gestation: experience with 100 consecutive pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 676–81.Google Scholar

McBrien, A, Howley, L, Yamamoto, Y, et al. Changes in fetal cardiac axis between 8 and 15 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 653–8.Google Scholar

Sinkovskaya, ES, Chaoui, R, Karl, K, et al. Fetal cardiac axis and congenital heart defects in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 453–60.Google Scholar

Taketazu, M, Lougheed, J, Yoo, SJ, et al. Spectrum of cardiovascular disease, accuracy of diagnosis, and outcome in fetal heterotaxy syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 720–4.Google Scholar

Shultz, SM, Pretorius, DH, Budorick, NE. Four chamber view of the fetal heart: demonstration related to menstrual age. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13; 285–9.Google Scholar

Paladini, D, Chita, SK, Allan, LD. Prenatal measurement of cardiothoracic ration in evaluation of heart disease. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 20–3.Google Scholar

Tongsong, T, Tatiyapornkul, T. Cardiothoracic ratio in the first half of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 186–9.Google Scholar

Chaoui, R, Bollmann, R, Göldner, B, Heling, KS, Tennstedt, C. Fetal cardiomegaly: echocardiographic findings and outcome in 19 cases. Fetal Diag Ther 1994; 9: 92–104.Google Scholar

Donofrio, MT, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 2183–242. [Erratum in Circulation 2014; 129: e512].Google Scholar

Ferencz, C, Rubin, JD, Loffredo, CA, Magee, CM. Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease: the Baltimore–Washington Infant Study 1981–1989. Austin, TX: Futura Publishing, 1993, p. 38.Google Scholar

Fyler, DC, Buckley, LP, Hellenbrand, WE, et al. Endocardial cushion defect. Report of the New England Regional infant cardiac program. J Pediatr 1980; 65: 441–4.Google Scholar

Samanek, M. Prevalence at birth, “natural” risk and survival with atrioventricular septal defect. Cardiol Young 1991; 1: 285–9.Google Scholar

Fyler, DC. Tetralogy of Fallot. In Nadas, AS, Fyler, DC (eds), Nadas’ Pediatric Cardiology, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus, 1992, pp. 471–91.Google Scholar

Poon, LCY, Huggon, IC, Zidere, V, et al. Tetralogy of Fallot in the fetus in the current era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 625–7.Google Scholar

Volpe, P, Paladini, D, Marasini, M, et al. Common arterial trunk in the fetus: characteristics, associations, and outcome in a multicentre series of 23 cases. Heart 2003; 89: 1437–41.Google Scholar

Webb, GD, McLaughlin, PR, Gow, RM, et al. Transposition complexes. Cardiol Clin 1993; 11: 651–64.Google Scholar

Allan, LD, Crawford, DC, Anderson, RH, et al. The spectrum of congenital heart disease detected echocardiographically in prenatal life. Br Heart J 1985; 54: 523–6.Google Scholar

Kirklin, JW, Barratt-Boyes, BG. Complete transposition of the great arteries. In Kirklin, JW, Barratt-Boyes, BG (eds), Cardiac Surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1993, pp. 1383–467.Google Scholar

Jex, RK, Puga, FJ, Julsrud, PR, et al. Repair of transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100: 682–6.Google Scholar

Sharland, G, Tingay, R, Jones, A, et al. Atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial discordance (congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries): echocardiographic features, associations, and outcome in 34 fetuses. Heart 2005; 91: 1453–8.Google Scholar

Paladini, D, Volpe, P, Marasini, M, et al. Diagnosis, characterization and outcome of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the fetus: a multicenter series of 30 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 281–5.Google Scholar

Allan, LD, Sharland, GK, Milburn, A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1452–8.Google Scholar

Raymond, FL, Simpson, JM, Sharland, GK, Ogilvie Mackie, CM. Fetal echocardiography as a predictor of chromosomal abnormality. Lancet 1997; 360: 930.Google Scholar

Myrianthopoulos, NC. Epidemiology of central nervous system malformations. In Vinken, PJ, Bruyn, GW (eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar

Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 102–13. PubMed PMID: 23280739.Google Scholar

Chaoui, R, Nicolaides, KH. From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35: 133–8. PubMed PMID: 20101633.Google Scholar

Chen, FC, Gerhardt, J, Entezami, M, Chaoui, R, Henrich, W. Detection of spina bifida by first trimester screening: results of the Prospective Multicenter Berlin IT-Study. Ultraschall Med 2015 Apr 14. [Epub ahead of print]. PubMed PMID: 25876171.Google Scholar

Karl, K, Heling, KS, Chaoui, R. Fluid area measurements in the posterior fossa at 11–13 weeks in normal fetuses and fetuses with open spina bifida. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 289–93. PubMed PMID: 25677252.Google Scholar

Volpe, P, Contro, E, Fanelli, T, et al. Appearance of the fetal posterior fossa at 11–14 weeks in fetuses with Dandy–Walker complex or chromosomal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 720–5. PubMed PMID: 25914043.Google Scholar

International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the “basic examination” and the “fetal neurosonogram”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 109–16. PubMed PMID: 17200992.Google Scholar

Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Berghella, V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 116–26. PubMed PMID: 20842655.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, BR, Frigoletto, FD, Bieber, FR. The fetal face: ultrasound examination. Radiology 1984; 153: 495–7. PubMed PMID: 6385109.Google Scholar

Ghi, T, Perolo, A, Banzi, C, et al. Two-dimensional ultrasound is accurate in the diagnosis of fetal craniofacial malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 543–51. PubMed PMID: 12047531.Google Scholar

Pilu, G, Reece, EA, Romero, R, Bovicelli, L, Hobbins, JC. Prenatal diagnosis of craniofacial malformations with ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 45–50. PubMed PMID: 3524242.Google Scholar

Campbell, S, Lees, C, Moscoso, G, Hall, P. Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D “reverse face” view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 12–18. PubMed PMID: 15619313.Google Scholar

Rotten, D, Levaillant, JM. Two- and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 2. Analysis of cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 402–11. PubMed PMID: 15343594.Google Scholar

Campbell, S, Lees, CC. The three-dimensional reverse face (3D RF) view for the diagnosis of cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 552–4. PubMed PMID: 14618674.Google Scholar

Pilu, G, Segata, M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 166–9. PubMed PMID: 17111460.Google Scholar

Platt, LD, Devore, GR, Pretorius, DH. Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the “flipped face” view. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1423–30. PubMed PMID: 17060428.Google Scholar

Ten, PM, Pedregosa, JP, Santacruz, B, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of cleft palate: “reverse face”, “flipped face” or “oblique face”: which method is best? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 399–406. PubMed PMID: 19109803.Google Scholar

Ghi, T, Tani, G, Savelli, L, et al. Prenatal imaging of facial clefts by magnetic resonance imaging with emphasis on the posterior palate. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 970–5. PubMed PMID: 14663832.Google Scholar

Kazan-Tannus, JF, Levine, D, McKenzie, C, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging aids prenatal diagnosis of isolated cleft palate. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 1533–40. PubMed PMID: 16239657.Google Scholar

Gupta, JK, Bryce, FC, Lilford, RJ. Management of apparently isolated fetal ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49: 716–21. PubMed PMID: 7816396.Google Scholar

Melchiorre, K, Bhide, A, Gika, AD, Pilu, G, Papageorghiou, AT. Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 212–24. PubMed PMID: 19644944.Google Scholar

Agathokleous, M, Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 247–61. PubMed PMID: 23208748.Google Scholar

Johnson, SP, Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Tunkel, S, Nicolaides, KH. Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 14–16. PubMed PMID: 9060123.Google Scholar

Ghi, T, Pilu, G, Falco, P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of open and closed spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 899–903. PubMed PMID: 17086581.Google Scholar

Van den Hof, MC, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, J, Campbell, S. Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 322–7. PubMed PMID: 2178424.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Appasamy, M, Roberts, D, Pilling, D, Buxton, N. Antenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in localizing the level of lesion in spina bifida and correlation with postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 530–6. PubMed PMID: 16619377.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Khalil, A, Caric, V, Papageorghiou, A, et al. Prenatal prediction of need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt in open spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 159–64. PubMed PMID: 24006252.Google Scholar

Goldstein, RB, LaPidus, AS, Filly, RA. Fetal cephaloceles: diagnosis with US. Radiology 1991; 180: 803–8. PubMed PMID: 1871297.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Blaas, HG, Eriksson, AG, Salvesen, KA, et al. Brains and faces in holoprosencephaly: pre- and postnatal description of 30 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 24–38. PubMed PMID: 11851965.Google Scholar

Santo, S, D’Antonio, F, Homfray, T, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 513–21. PubMed PMID: 23024003.Google Scholar

Sotiriadis, A, Makrydimas, G. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 337.e1–5. PubMed PMID: 22284958.Google Scholar

Bault, JP, Salomon, LJ, Guibaud, L, Achiron, R. Role of three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the optic tract in fetuses with agenesis of the septum pellucidum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 570–5. PubMed PMID: 20878682.Google Scholar

Robinson, AJ. Inferior vermian hypoplasia: preconception, misconception. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 123–36. PubMed PMID: 24497418.Google Scholar

Gandolfi Colleoni, G, Contro, E, Carletti, A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 625–31. PubMed PMID: 22173885.Google Scholar

Limperopoulos, C, Robertson, RL, Estroff, JA, et al. Diagnosis of inferior vermian hypoplasia by fetal magnetic resonance imaging: potential pitfalls and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1070–6. PubMed PMID: 16580298.Google Scholar

Quarello, E, Molho, M, Garel, C, et al. Prenatal abnormal features of the fourth ventricle in Joubert syndrome and related disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 227–32. PubMed PMID: 23868831.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ghi, T, Simonazzi, G, Perolo, A, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed intracranial hemorrhage: case series and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 121–30. PubMed PMID: 12905503.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Govaert, P. Prenatal stroke. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14: 250–66. PubMed PMID: 19664975.Google Scholar

Picone, O, Teissier, N, Cordier, AG, et al. Detailed in utero ultrasound description of 30 cases of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 518–24. PubMed PMID: 24532345.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chervenak, FA, Rosenberg, J, Brightman, RC, Chitkara, U, Jeanty, P. A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 908–10. PubMed PMID: 3554067.Google Scholar

Stoler-Poria, S, Lev, D, Schweiger, A, Lerman-Sagie, T, Malinger, G. Developmental outcome of isolated fetal microcephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 154–8. PubMed PMID: 20069548.Google Scholar

Schlembach, D, Bornemann, A, Rupprecht, T, Beinder, E. Fetal intracranial tumors detected by ultrasound: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 407–18. PubMed PMID: 10658280.Google Scholar

Tworetzky, W, McElhinney, DB, Margossian, R, et al. Association between cardiac tumors and tuberous sclerosis in the fetus and neonate. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 487–9. PubMed PMID: 12914889.Google Scholar

Sepulveda, W, Platt, CC, Fisk, NM. Prenatal diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformation using color Doppler ultrasonography: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 282–6. PubMed PMID: 8590192.Google Scholar

Garel, C, Azarian, M, Lasjaunias, P, Luton, D. Pial arteriovenous fistulas: dilemmas in prenatal diagnosis, counseling and postnatal treatment. Report of three cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 293–6. PubMed PMID: 16052602.Google Scholar

Laurichesse Delmas, H, Winer, N, Gallot, D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of thrombosis of the dural sinuses: report of six cases, review of the literature and suggested management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 188–98. PubMed PMID: 18512853.Google Scholar

Malinger, G, Kidron, D, Schreiber, L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of malformations of cortical development by dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 178–91. PubMed PMID: 17219377.Google Scholar

Bellis, TH, Wohlgemuth, B. The incidence of cleft lip and palate deformities in the south-east of Scotland (1971–1990). Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 121–5. PubMed PMID: 10420246.Google Scholar

Jones, MC. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: detection rates, accuracy of ultrasonography, associated anomalies, and strategies for counseling. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 169–73. PubMed PMID: 11879073.Google Scholar

Berge, SJ, Plath, H, Van de Vondel, PT, et al. Fetal cleft lip and palate: sonographic diagnosis, chromosomal abnormalities, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome in 70 fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 422–31. PubMed PMID: 11844159.Google Scholar

Nyberg, DA, Sickler, GK, Hegge, FN, Kramer, DJ, Kropp, RJ. Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: US classification and correlation with outcome. Radiology 1995; 195: 677–84. PubMed PMID: 7753993.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Salvesen, DR, Snijders, RJ, Gosden, CM. Fetal facial defects: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993; 8: 1–9. PubMed PMID: 8452644.Google Scholar

Gabrielli, S, Piva, M, Ghi, T, et al. Bilateral cleft lip and palate without premaxillary protrusion is associated with lethal aneuploidies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 416–18. PubMed PMID: 19697393.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mailath-Pokorny, M, Worda, C, Krampl-Bettelheim, E, et al. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 445–51. PubMed PMID: 20617504.Google Scholar

Sepulveda, W, Wong, AE, Martinez-Ten, P, Perez-Pedregosa, J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 7–13. PubMed PMID: 20014330.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, BR, Sadow, PM, Barnewolt, CE, Estroff, JA, Benson, C. Cleft of the secondary palate without cleft lip diagnosed with three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in a fetus with Fryns’ syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 566–70. PubMed PMID: 16619385.Google Scholar

David, DJ, Moore, MH, Cooter, RD. Tessier clefts revisited with a third dimension. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26: 163–84. PubMed PMID: 2503273.Google Scholar

Kawamoto, HK. The kaleidoscopic world of rare craniofacial clefts: order out of chaos (Tessier classification). Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3: 529–72. PubMed PMID: 788997.Google Scholar

Pilu, G, Romero, R, Rizzo, N, et al. Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly. Am J Perinatol 1987; 4: 41–9. PubMed PMID: 3539134.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Tortora, M, Mayden, K, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of median cleft face syndrome: sonographic demonstration of cleft lip and hypertelorism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 94–7. PubMed PMID: 6720787.Google Scholar

DeMyer, W. The median cleft face syndrome. Differential diagnosis of cranium bifidum occultum, hypertelorism, and median cleft nose, lip, and palate. Neurology 1967; 17: 961–71. PubMed PMID: 6069608.Google Scholar

Asai, S, Tanaka, M, Miyakoshi, K, et al. A case of Tessier number 7 cleft with severe micrognathia: prenatal sonographic and three-dimensional helical computed tomographic images. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 159–61. PubMed PMID: 20013874.Google Scholar

Pilu, G, Visentin, A, Ambrosini, G, D’Antona, D, Andrisani, A. Three-dimensional sonography of unilateral Tessier number 7 cleft in a mid-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 98–9. PubMed PMID: 15909323.Google Scholar

Presti, F, Celentano, C, Marcazzo, L, Dolcetta, G, Prefumo, F. Ultrasound prenatal diagnosis of a lateral facial cleft (Tessier number 7). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 606–8. PubMed PMID: 15170805.Google Scholar

Blazer, S, Zimmer, EZ, Mezer, E, Bronshtein, M. Early and late onset fetal microphthalmia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1354–9. PubMed PMID: 16647921.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Zimmer, E, Gershoni-Baruch, R, et al. First- and second-trimester diagnosis of fetal ocular defects and associated anomalies: report of eight cases. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 443–9. PubMed PMID: 1992414.Google Scholar

Ghi, T, Contro, E, Carletti, A, et al. Prenatal sonographic imaging of Goldenhar syndrome associated with cystic eye. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 362–3. PubMed PMID: 18382997.Google Scholar

Tamas, DE, Mahony, BS, Bowie, JD, Woodruff, WW, Kay, HH. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of hemifacial microsomia (Goldenhar-Gorlin syndrome). J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5: 461–3. PubMed PMID: 3528526.Google Scholar

Rosner, M, Bronshtein, M, Leikomovitz, P, et al. Transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of cataract in a fetus. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996; 6: 90–3. PubMed PMID: 8744858.Google Scholar

Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Friedman, AH, Santos, R. Autosomal dominant cataracts of the fetus: early detection by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 104–8. PubMed PMID: 8883312.Google Scholar

Davis, WK, Mahony, BS, Carroll, BA, Bowie, JD. Antenatal sonographic detection of benign dacrocystoceles (lacrimal duct cysts). J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6: 461–5. PubMed PMID: 3305983.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldberg, H, Sebire, NJ, Holwell, D, Hill, S. Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral dacrocystoceles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 448–9. PubMed PMID: 10976494.Google Scholar

Bault, JP, Quarello, E. Retinal coloboma: prenatal diagnosis using a new technique, the “virtual fetal eyeground”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 495–6. PubMed PMID: 19308931.Google Scholar

Paladini, D. Fetal micrognathia: almost always an ominous finding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 377–84. PubMed PMID: 20373481.Google Scholar

Hsieh, YY, Chang, CC, Tsai, HD, et al. The prenatal diagnosis of Pierre-Robin sequence. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 567–9. PubMed PMID: 10416975.Google Scholar

Lee, W, McNie, B, Chaiworapongsa, T, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic presentation of micrognathia. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 775–81. PubMed PMID: 12099566.Google Scholar

Paladini, D, Morra, T, Teodoro, A, et al. Objective diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus: the jaw index. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 382–6. PubMed PMID: 10074984.Google Scholar

Pilu, G, Romero, R, Reece, EA, Jeanty, P, Hobbins, JC. The prenatal diagnosis of Robin anomalad. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 630–2. PubMed PMID: 3513591.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rotten, D, Levaillant, JM, Martinez, H, Ducou le Pointe H, Vicaut E. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 122–30. PubMed PMID: 11876802.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Blazer, S, Zalel, Y, Zimmer, EZ. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of glossoptosis in fetuses with Pierre Robin sequence in early and mid pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1561–4. PubMed PMID: 16202757.Google Scholar

Vettraino, IM, Lee, W, Bronsteen, RA, et al. Clinical outcome of fetuses with sonographic diagnosis of isolated micrognathia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 801–5. PubMed PMID: 14551011.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Tortora, M, Moya, FR, Hobbins, JC. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of epignathus. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 235–7. PubMed PMID: 6726887.Google Scholar

Gull, I, Wolman, I, Har-Toov, J, et al. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of epignathus at 15 weeks of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 271–3. PubMed PMID: 10341408.Google Scholar

Chen, CP, Shih, JC, Huang, JK, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasound demonstration of a giant epignathus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 407–9. PubMed PMID: 12704754.Google Scholar

Dar, P, Rosenthal, J, Factor, S, Dubiosso, R, Murthy, AS. First-trimester diagnosis of fetal epignathus with 2- and 3-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1743–6. PubMed PMID: 19933492.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Benachi, A, Aubry, MC, et al. The impact of 3-dimensional ultrasonography on perinatal management of a large epignathus teratoma without ex utero intrapartum treatment. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: e31–4. PubMed PMID: 16291137.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM, Zigalo, A, Abulafia, O. Prenatal 3-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of a massive fetal epignathus occluding the oral orifice and both nostrils at 35 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1503–5. PubMed PMID: 17060444.Google Scholar

Munro, IR, Sinclair, WJ, Rudd, NL. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 657–63. PubMed PMID: 432334.Google Scholar

Cook, K, Prefumo, F, Presti, F, Homfray, T, Campbell, S. The prenatal diagnosis of Binder syndrome before 24 weeks of gestation: case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 578–81. PubMed PMID: 11169356.Google Scholar

Cuillier, F, Cartault, F, Lemaire, P, Alessandri, JL. Maxillo-nasal dysplasia (Binder syndrome): antenatal discovery and implications. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20: 301–5. PubMed PMID: 15980645.Google Scholar

Lajeunie, E, Le Merrer, M, Bonaiti-Pellie, C, Marchac, D, Renier, D. Genetic study of nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet 1995; 55: 500–4. PubMed PMID: 7762595.Google Scholar

Boulet, SL, Rasmussen, SA, Honein, MA. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A: 984–91. PubMed PMID: 18344207.Google Scholar

Wilkie, AO, Byren, JC, Hurst, JA, et al. Prevalence and complications of single-gene and chromosomal disorders in craniosynostosis. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e391–400. PubMed PMID: 20643727.Google Scholar

Robin, NH, Falk, MJ, Haldeman-Englert, CR. FGFR-Related Craniosynostosis Syndromes. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Seattle, 1993–1998 [updated 2007 Sep 27].Google Scholar

Anderson, FM, Geiger, L. Craniosynostosis: a survey of 204 cases. J Neurosurg 1965; 22: 229–40. PubMed PMID: 14306216.Google Scholar

Shillito, J Jr., Matson, DD. Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics 1968; 41: 829–53. PubMed PMID: 5643989.Google Scholar

van der Meulen, J, van der Hulst, R, van Adrichem, L, et al. The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: 283–6. PubMed PMID: 19326483.Google Scholar

Kolar, JC. An epidemiological study of nonsyndromal craniosynostoses. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22: 47–9. PubMed PMID: 21187784.Google Scholar

Carinci, F, Pezzetti, F, Locci, P, et al. Apert and Crouzon syndromes: clinical findings, genes and extracellular matrix. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 361–8. PubMed PMID: 15915098.Google Scholar

Vogels, A, Fryns, JP. Pfeiffer syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2006; 1: 19. PubMed PMID: 16740155.Google Scholar

Greally, M. Shprintzen–Goldberg Syndrome. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle, 1993–2006 Jan 13 [updated 2010 Nov 16].Google Scholar

Brahman, S, Jenna, R, Wittenauer, HJ. Sonographic in utero appearance of Kleeblattschadel syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound 1979; 7: 481–4. PubMed PMID: 118189.Google Scholar

Salvo, AF. In utero diagnosis of Kleeblattschadel (cloverleaf skull). Prenat Diagn 1981; 1: 141–5. PubMed PMID: 7346817.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, BR, Spiro, R, Mitchell, AG. Using three-dimensional ultrasound to detect craniosynostosis in a fetus with Pfeiffer syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 391–4. PubMed PMID: 11169319.Google Scholar

Saal, HM, Bulas, DI, Allen, JF, et al. Patient with craniosynostosis and marfanoid phenotype (Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome) and cloverleaf skull. Am J Med Genet 1995; 57: 573–8. PubMed PMID: 7573131.Google Scholar

Skidmore, DL, Pai, AP, Toi, A, Steele, L, Chitayat, D. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 1009–13. PubMed PMID: 14663839.Google Scholar

Filkins, K, Russo, JF, Boehmer, S, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic and molecular diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 1081–4. PubMed PMID: 9399359.Google Scholar

Miller, C, Losken, HW, Towbin, R, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 73–80. PubMed PMID: 11772173.Google Scholar

Delahaye, S, Bernard, JP, Renier, D, Ville, Y. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 347–53. PubMed PMID: 12704742.Google Scholar

Ginath, S, Debby, A, Malinger, G. Demonstration of cranial sutures and fontanelles at 15 to 16 weeks of gestation: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 812–15. PubMed PMID: 15503277.Google Scholar

Chaoui, R, Levaillant, JM, Benoit, B, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic description of abnormal metopic suture in second- and third-trimester fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 761–4. PubMed PMID: 16308900.Google Scholar

Esser, T, Rogalla, P, Bamberg, C, Kalache, KD. Application of the three-dimensional maximum mode in prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1743–5. PubMed PMID: 16260220.Google Scholar

Lam, H, Lo, TK, Lau, E, Chin, R, Tang, L. The use of 2- and 3-dimensional sonographic scans in the evaluation of cranial sutures: prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1481–4. PubMed PMID: 17060439.Google Scholar

Faro, C, Chaoui, R, Wegrzyn, P, et al. Metopic suture in fetuses with Apert syndrome at 22–27 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 28–33. PubMed PMID: 16317802.Google Scholar

Itoh, S, Nojima, M, Yoshida, K. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for accurate diagnosis of Pfeiffer syndrome type II in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006; 21: 168–71. PubMed PMID: 16490997.Google Scholar

Fjortoft, MI, Sevely, A, Boetto, S, Kessler, S, Sarramon, MF, Rolland, M. Prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: value of MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 515–21. PubMed PMID: 17310357.Google Scholar

Weber, B, Schwabegger, AH, Vodopiutz, J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome with cloverleaf skull deformity using ultrasound, fetal magnetic resonance imaging and genetic analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 51–6. PubMed PMID: 19940464.Google Scholar

Nazzaro, A, Della Monica, M, Lonardo, F, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of a case of Pfeiffer syndrome without cloverleaf skull and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 918–22. PubMed PMID: 15565658.Google Scholar

Kapp-Simon, KA, Speltz, ML, Cunningham, ML, Patel, PK, Tomita, T. Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 269–81. PubMed PMID: 17186250.Google Scholar

Chieffo, D, Tamburrini, G, Massimi, L, et al. Long-term neuropsychological development in single-suture craniosynostosis treated early. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010; 5: 232–7. PubMed PMID: 20192638.Google Scholar

Warschausky, S, Angobaldo, J, Kewman, D, et al. Early development of infants with untreated metopic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1518–23. PubMed PMID: 15861054Google Scholar

Merrill, DC, Weiner, C.P. Urinary tract obstruction. In Fisk, NM, Moise, KJ (eds), Fetal Therapy: Invasive and Transplacental. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 273–86.Google Scholar

Stone, LP, Stone, PM, Rydbom, EA, et al. Customized nutritional enhancement for pregnant women appears to lower incidence of certain common maternal and neonatal complications: an observational study. Global Adv Health Med 2014; 3: 50–5.Google Scholar

Chevalier, RL. Congenital urinary tract obstruction: the long view. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2015; 22: 312–19.Google Scholar

Sanghvi, KP, Merchant, RH, Gondhalekar, A, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of congenital renal malformations using ultrasound. J Trop Pediatr 1998; 44: 235–40.Google Scholar

Malin, G, Tonks, AM, Morris, RK, Gardosi, J, Kilby, MD. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study. BJOG 2012; 119: 1455–64.Google Scholar

Sebire, NJ, Von Kaisenberg, C, Rubio, C, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal megacystis at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 387–90.Google Scholar

Nguyen, HT, Benson, CB, Bromley, B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10: 982–98.Google Scholar

Flake, AW, Harrison, MR, Sauer, L, Adzick, NS, deLorimier, AA. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the fetus. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21: 1058–63.Google Scholar

Woodward, M, Frank, D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 2002; 89: 149–56.Google Scholar

Farrugia, MK, Hitchcock, R, Radford, A, et al. British Association of Paediatric Urologists consensus statement on the management of the primary obstructive megaureter. J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10: 26–33.Google Scholar

DiRenzo, D, Persico, A, DiNicola, M, et al. Conservative management of primary non-refluxing megaureter during the first year of life: A longitudinal observational study. J Pediatr Urol 2015; 11: 226 e1–6.Google Scholar

Malin, G, Tonks, AM, Morris, RK, Gardosi, J, Kilby, MD. Congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: a population-based epidemiological study. BJOG 2012; 119: 1455–64.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Long-term renal and neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with LUTO, with and without fetal intervention. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 607–10.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MM. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and the Urinary Tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2014; 33: 293–320.Google Scholar

Thomas, DF. Fetal uropathy. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 225–31.Google Scholar

Havutcu, AE, Nikolopoulos, G, Adinkra, P, Lamont, RF. The association between fetal pyelectasis on second trimester ultrasound scan and aneuploidy among 25,586 low risk unselected women. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 1201–6.Google Scholar

Anderson, N, Clautice-Engle, T, Allan, R, Abbott, G, Wells, JE. Detection of obstructive uropathy in the fetus: predictive value of sonographic measurements of renal pelvic diameter at various gestational ages. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 719–23.Google Scholar

Morin, L, Cendron, M, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: clinical significance and implications for management. J Urol 1996; 155: 2047–9.Google Scholar

Grignon, A, Filion, R, Filiatrault, D, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radiology 1986; 160: 645–7.Google Scholar

Lee, RS, Cendron, M, Kinnamon, DD, Nguyen, HT. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 586–93.Google Scholar

Simoni, F, Vino, L, Pizzini, C, Benini, D, Fanos, V. Megaureter: classification, pathophysiology, and management. Pediatr Med Chir 2000; 22: 15–24.Google Scholar

Robyr, R, Benachi, A, Daikha-Dahmane, F, et al. Correlation between ultrasound and anatomical findings in fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction in the first half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 478–82.Google Scholar

Hutton, KA, Thomas, DF, Davies, BW. Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: qualitative assessment of second trimester scans and prediction of outcome. J Urol 1997; 158: 1022–5.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Middleton, LJ, Malin, GL, et al. Outcome in fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: a prospective registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 424–31.Google Scholar

Pico, H, Dabadie, A, Bourliere-Najean, B, et al. Contribution of the foetal uro-MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of uronephropathies. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 573–8.Google Scholar

Emerson, DS, Felker, RE, Brown, DL. The saggital sign: an early second trimester indicator of fetal gender. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8: 293–7.Google Scholar

Mazza, V, Falcinelli, C, Paganelli, S et al. Sonographic early fetal gender assignment: a longitudinal study in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 513–16.Google Scholar

Hurtig, AL. The psychosocial effects of ambiguous genitalia. Compr Ther 1992; 18: 22–5.Google Scholar

Kutteh, WH, Santos-Ramos, R, Ermel, LD. Accuracy of ultrasonic detection of the uterus in normal newborn infants: implications for infants with ambiguous genitalia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 109–13.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Riechler, A, Zimmer, EZ. Prenatal sonographic signs of possible fetal genital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 215–19.Google Scholar

Grannum, P, Bracken, M, Silverman, R, Hobbins, J. Assessment of fetal kidney size in normal gestation by comparison of ratio of kidney circumference to abdominal circumference. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 249–54.Google Scholar

Jeanty, P, Dramaix-Wilmet, M, Elkhazen, N, Hubinont, C, van Regemorter, N. Measurement of fetal kidney growth on ultrasound. Radiology 1982; 144: 159–62.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Bar-Hava, I, Lightman, A. The significance of early second-trimester sonographic detection of minor fetal renal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 627–32.Google Scholar

Droste, S, Fitzsimmons, J, Pascoe-Mason, J, Shepard, TH, Mack, LA. Size of the fetal adrenal in bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 206–9.Google Scholar

Sepulveda, W, Stagiannis, KD, Flack, NJ, Fisk, NM. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of renal agenesis with color flow imaging in severe second-trimester oligohydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1788–92.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Amit, A, Achiron, R, Noy, I, Blumenfeld, Z. The early prenatal sonographic diagnosis of renal agenesis: techniques and possible pitfalls. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14: 291–7.Google Scholar

Heaney, JA, Pfister, RC, Meares, EM. Giant cyst of the seminal vesicle with renal agenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 139–40.Google Scholar

Castori, M, Rinaldi, R, Capocaccia, P, Roggini, M, Grammatico, P. VACTERL association and maternal diabetes: a possible causal relationship? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008; 82: 169–72.Google Scholar

Meizner, I, Yitzhak, M, Levi, A, et al. Fetal pelvic kidney: a challenge in prenatal diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 391–3.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM, Cullen, JB, Thompson, HO, Metlay, LA, Woods, JR. Prenatal sonographic findings associated with a fetal horseshoe kidney. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 477–9.Google Scholar

Kennedy, WA, Chitkara, U, Abidari, JM, Shortliffe, LM. Fetal renal growth as assessed through renal parenchymal area derived from prenatal and perinatal ultrasonography. J Urol 2003; 169: 298–302.Google Scholar

Resnick, J, Vernier, RL. Cystic disease of the kidney in the newborn infant. Clin Perinatol 1981; 8: 375–90.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Damen-Elias, HA, Stoutenbeek, PH, Visser, GH, Nikkels, PG, de Jong, TP. Concomitant anomalies in 100 children with unilateral multicystic kidney. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 384–8.Google Scholar

Wisser, J, Hebisch, G, Froster, U, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) during the early second trimester. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 868–71.Google Scholar

Ebner, K, Feldkoetter, M, Ariceta, G, et al. Rationale, design and objectives of ARegPKD, a European ARPKD registry study. BMC Nephrol 2015; 16: 22.Google Scholar

Sinibaldi, D, Malena, S, Mingarelli, R, Rizzoni, G. Prenatal ultrasonographic findings of dominant polycystic kidney disease and postnatal renal evolution. Am J Med Genet 1996; 65: 337–41.Google Scholar

European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium. The polycystic kidney disease 1 gene encodes a 14 kb transcript and lies within a duplicated region on chromosome 16. Cell 1994; 77: 881–94.Google Scholar

Lord, J, McMullan, DJ, Eberhardt, RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393: 747–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31940-8.Google Scholar

Petrovski, S, Aggarwal, V, Giordano, JL, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393: 758–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32042-7.Google Scholar

Quinlan-Jones, E, Lord, J, Williams, D, et al. Molecular autopsy by trio exome sequencing (ES) and postmortem examination in fetuses and neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies. Genet Med 2019; 21: 1065–73. doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0298-8.Google Scholar

Gubler, MC. Renal tubular dysgenesis. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29: 51–9.Google Scholar

Lonergan, GJ, Martinez-Leon, MI, Agrons, GA, Montemarano, H, Suarez, ES. Nephrogenic rests, nephroblastomatosis, and associated lesions of the kidney. Radiographics 1998; 18: 947–68.Google Scholar

Holmberg, C, Jalanko, H. [Congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type: key to the mechanisms of proteinuria]. Duodecim 2011; 127: 1017–25.Google Scholar

Barisic, I, Boban, L, Loane, M, et al. Meckel-Gruber Syndrome: a population-based study on prevalence, prenatal diagnosis, clinical features, and survival in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23: 746–52.Google Scholar

Wiesel, A, Queisser-Luft, A, Clementi, M, Bianca, S, Stoll, C. Prenatal detection of congenital renal malformations by fetal ultrasonographic examination: an analysis of 709,030 births in 12 European countries. Eur J Med Genet 2005; 48: 131–44.Google Scholar

Chalouhi, GE, Millischer, AÉ, Mahallati, H, et al. The use of fetal MRI for renal and urogenital tract anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40: 100–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5610.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Cheng, HH, Abbas, A, Snijders, RJ, Gosden, C. Fetal renal defects: associated malformations and chromosomal defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 1992; 7: 1–11.Google Scholar

Barth, RA, Filly, RA, Sondheimer, FK. Prenatal sonographic findings in bladder exstrophy. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 359–61.Google Scholar

Wangler, MF, Beaudet, AL. ACTG2-related disorders. In Pagon, RA, Adam, MP, Ardinger, HH, et al. (eds), GeneReviews. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 1993–2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK299311/ (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

Wangler, MF, Gonzaga-Jauregui, C, Gambin, T, et al. Heterozygous de novo and inherited mutations in the smooth muscle actin (ACTG2) gene underlie megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome. PLoS Genet 2014; 10 (3): e1004258.Google Scholar

Wickstrom, EA, Thangavelu, M, Parilla, BV, Tamura, RK, Sabbagha, RE. A prospective study of the association between isolated fetal pyelectasis and chromosomal abnormality. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 379–82.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Antenatal ultrasound to predict postnatal renal function in congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: systematic review of test accuracy. BJOG 2009; 116: 1290–9.Google Scholar

Lipitz, S, Ryan, G, Samuell, C, et al. Fetal urine analysis for the assessment of renal function in obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 174–9.Google Scholar

Glick, PL, Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, et al. Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis II: prognostic criteria and selection for treatment. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20: 376–87.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1239–44.Google Scholar

Nicolini, U, Spelzini, F. Invasive assessment of fetal renal abnormalities: urinalysis, fetal blood sampling and biopsy. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 964–9.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Quinlan-Jones, E, Kilby, MD, Khan, KS. Systematic review of accuracy of fetal urine analysis to predict poor postnatal renal function in cases of congenital urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 900–11.Google Scholar

Johnson, MP, Corsi, P, Bradfield, W, et al. Sequential urinalysis improves evaluation of fetal renal function in obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 59–65.Google Scholar

Foxall, PJ, Bewley, S, Neild, GH, Rodeck, CH, Nicholson, JK. Analysis of fetal and neonatal urine using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 73: F153–7.Google Scholar

Klein, J, Lacroix, C, Caubet, C, et al. Fetal urinary peptides to predict postnatal outcome of renal disease in fetuses with posterior urethral valves (PUV). Sci Transl Med 2013; 5 (198): 198ra06.Google Scholar

Dommergues, M, Muller, F, Ngo, S, et al. Fetal serum beta2-microglobulin predicts postnatal renal function in bilateral uropathies. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 312–16.Google Scholar

Bunduki, V, Saldanha, LB, Sadek, L, et al. Fetal renal biopsies in obstructive uropathy: feasibility and clinical correlations–preliminary results. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 101–9.Google Scholar

Hutton, KA, Thomas, DF, Arthur, RJ, Irving, HC, Smith, SE. Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: is gestational age at detection a predictor of outcome? J Urol 1994; 152: 698–701.Google Scholar

Kilby, MD, Morris, RK. Fetal therapy for the treatment of congenital bladder neck obstruction. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 412–19.Google Scholar

Allen, KA. Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 1289–304.Google Scholar

Lafarge, C, Mitchell, K, Fox, P. Perinatal grief following a termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality: the impact of coping strategies. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 1173–82.Google Scholar

Denny, E, Quinlan-Jones, E, Bibila, S, Kilby, M. The experience of pregnant women with a diagnosis of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Midwifery 2014; 30: 636–42.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Ross, N, Noall, R, de Lorimier, AA. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero. I. The model: fetal urethral obstruction produces hydronephrosis and pulmonary hypoplasia in fetal lambs. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 247–56.Google Scholar

Glick, PL, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Noall, RA, Villa, RL. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero IV: in utero decompression prevents renal dysplasia. J Pediatr Surg 1984; 19: 649–57.Google Scholar

Glick, PL, Harrison, MR, Noall, RA, Villa, RL. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero III. Early mid-trimester ureteral obstruction produces renal dysplasia. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 681–7.Google Scholar

Welsh, A, Agarwal, S, Kumar, S, Smith, RP, Fisk, NM. Fetal cystoscopy in the management of fetal obstructive uropathy: experience in a single European centre. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 1033–41.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Johnson, MP, Flake, AW, et al. Reproductive outcomes after pregnancy complicated by maternal-fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1430–6.Google Scholar

Fontanella, F, Duin, LK, Adama van Scheltema, PN, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of LUTO: improving diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 739–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18990.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Wilson, C, et al. Fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: proposal for standardized multidisciplinary prenatal management based on disease severity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 476–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15844.Google Scholar

Ruano, R. Fetal surgery for severe lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 667–74.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Quinlan-Jones, E, et al. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1496–506.Google Scholar

Nassr, AA, Shazly, SAM, Abdelmagied, AM, et al. Effectiveness of vesicoamniotic shunt in fetuses with congenital lower urinary tract obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 696–703. doi: 10.1002/uog.15988.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, et al. Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case–control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 452–8.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Ruano, R, Kilby, MD. Effectiveness of fetal cystoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic intervention for lower urinary tract obstruction: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 629–37.Google Scholar

Davenport, MT, Merguerian, PA, Koyle, M. Antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: current postnatal management. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29: 207–14.Google Scholar

Bildau, J, Enzensberger, C, Degenhardt, J, et al. [Lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO): clinical picture, prenatal diagnostics and therapeutic options]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2014; 218: 18–26.Google Scholar

Borsellino, A, Zaccara, A, Nahom, A, et al. False-positive rate in prenatal diagnosis of surgical anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 826–9.Google Scholar

Aite, L, Zaccara, A, Trucchi, A, et al. Parents’ informational needs at the birth of a baby with a surgically correctable anomaly Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22: 267–70.Google Scholar

Stoll, C, Alembik, Y, Dott, B, Roth, MP. Omphalocele and gastroschisis and associated malformations. Am J Med Genet 2008; 146A: 1280–5.Google Scholar

Cantrell, JR, Haller, JA, Ravitch, MM. A syndrome of congenital defects involving the abdominal wall, sternum, diaphragm, pericardium and heart. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958; 107: 602–4.Google Scholar

Brantberg, A, Blaas, HG, Haugen, SE, Eik-Nes, SH. Characteristics and outcome of 90 cases of fetal omphalocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 27–37.Google Scholar

Zidere, V, Allan, LD. Changing findings in pentalogy of Cantrell in fetal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 835–7.Google Scholar

Biard, JM, Wilson, RD, Johnson, MP, et al. Prenatally diagnosed giant omphaloceles: short- and long-term outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 434–9.Google Scholar

Kamata, S, Ishikawa, S, Usui, N, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of abdominal wall defects and their prognosis. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 267–71.Google Scholar

Danzer, E, Gerdes, M, D’Agostino, JA, et al. Prospective, interdisciplinary follow-up of children with prenatally diagnosed giant omphalocele: short-term neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr Surg.2010; 45: 718–23.Google Scholar

Partridge, EA, Hanna, BD, Panitch, HB, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in giant omphalocele infants. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 1767–70.Google Scholar

Montero, FJ, Simpson, LL, Brady, PC, Miller, RS. Fetal omphalocele ratios predict outcomes in prenatally diagnosed omphalocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 284.e1–7Google Scholar

Chapman-Sheath, P, Wilcox, D, Mok, Q, Drake, D. Iatrogenic ileal obstruction: a complication of umbilical cord clamping. BMJ 1996; 313: 613–14.Google Scholar

Sepulveda, W. Beware of the umbilical cord “cyst”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 213–14.Google Scholar

Wald, NJ, Cuckle, RS. Neural tube defects: screening and biochemical diagnosis. In Rodeck, CH, Nicolaides, KH (eds), Prenatal Diagnosis. Proceedings of the Eleventh Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1983, p. 234.Google Scholar

Gibbin, C, Touch, S, Broth, RE, Berghella, V. Abdominal wall defects and congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 21: 334–7.Google Scholar

Salihu, HM, Boos, R, Schmidt, W. Omphalocele and gastroschisis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22: 489–92.Google Scholar

Pandey, V, Gangopadhyay, AN, Gupta, DK, Sharma, SP, Kumar, V. Non-operative management of giant omphalocele with topical povidone-iodine and powdered antibiotic combination: early experience from a tertiary centre. Pediatr Surg Int 2014; 30: 407–11.Google Scholar

Kouame, BD, Odehouri, TH, Yaokreh, JB, et al. Outcomes of conservative treatment of giant omphaloceles with dissodic 2% aqueous eosin: 15 years’ experience. Afr J Paed Surg 2014; 11: 170–3.Google Scholar

Koivusalo, A, Lindahl, H, Rintala, RJ. Morbidity and quality of life in adult patients with a congenital abdominal wall defect: a questionnaire survey. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 1594–601.Google Scholar

Suhr, M, Jennings, R, Miller, J, Ryan, K. Retrospective case study of team approach to omphalocele orthosis fabrication and implementation. Pediatr Phys Ther 2008; 20: 284–7.Google Scholar

Sipes, SL, Weiner, CP, Spies, DR, et al. Gastroschisis and omphalocele: Does either antenatal diagnosis or route of delivery make a difference in perinatal outcome? Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 195–9.Google Scholar

Moretti, M, Khoury, A, Rodriquez, J, et al. The effect of mode of delivery on the perinatal outcome in fetuses with abdominal wall defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 833–8.Google Scholar

Mitanchez, D, Walter-Nicolet, E, Humblot, A, et al. Neonatal care in patients with giant ompholocele: arduous management but favorable outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 1727–33.Google Scholar

van Eijck, FC, Wijnen, RM, van Goor, H. The incidence and morbidity of adhesions after treatment of neonates with gastroschisis and omphalocele: a 30-year review. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 479–83.Google Scholar

Baird, PA, MacDonald, EL. An epidemiologic study of congenital malformations of the anterior abdominal wall in more than half a million consecutive live births. Am J Hum Genet 1981; 33: 470–8.Google Scholar

Canfield, MA, Collins, JS, Botto, LD, et al. Changes in the Birth Prevalence of Selected Birth Defects after grain fortification with folic acid in the United States: Findings from a multi-state population based study. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 2005; 73: 679–89.Google Scholar

Mills, JL, Carter, TC, Kay, DM, et al. Folate and vitamin B12-related genes and risk for omphalocele. Hum Genet 2012; 131: 739–46Google Scholar

Gamba, P, Midrio, P. Abdominal wall defects: prenatal diagnosis, newborn management, and long-term outcomes. Semin Pediatr Surg 2014; 23: 283–90.Google Scholar

Suver, D, Lee, SL, Shekherdimian, S, Kim, SS. Left sided gastroschisis: higher incidence of extraintestinal congenital anomalies. Am J Surgery 2008; 195: 663–6.Google Scholar

Chen, XK, Wen, SW, Fleming, N, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Teenage pregnancy and congenital anomalies: which system is vulnerable? Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1730–5.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, SA, Frias, JL. Non-genetic risk factors for gastroschisis. Am J Med Genet 2008 Part C; 148C: 199–212.Google Scholar

Bargy, F, Beaudoin, S. Comprehensive developmental mechanisms in gastroschisis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 223–30.Google Scholar

Lubinsky, M. A vascular and thrombotic model of gastroschisis. Am J Med Genet 2014; 164A: 915–17.Google Scholar

David, AL, Holloway, A, Thomasson, L, et al. A case–control study of maternal periconceptual and pregnancy recreational drug use and fetal malformation using hair analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e111038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111038.Google Scholar

Mastroiacovo, P, Lisi, A, Castilla, EE, et al. Gastroschisis and associated defects: An international study. Am J Med Genet 2007; Part A 143A: 660–71.Google Scholar

Arnold, MA Chang, DC, Nabaweesia, R, et al. Risk stratification of 4344 patients with gastroschisis into simple and complex categories. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 1520–5.Google Scholar

Long, A-M, Court, J, Morabito, A, Gillham, JC. Antenatal diagnosis of bowel dilatation in gastroschisis is predictive of poor postnatal outcome. J Pediat Surg 2011; 46: 1070–5.Google Scholar

Goetzinger, KR, Tuuli, MG, Longman, RE, et al. Sonographic predictors of postnatal bowel atresia in fetal gastroschisis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 420–5.Google Scholar

Overcash, RT, DeUgarte, DA, Stephenson, ML, et al.; University of California Fetal Consortium. Factors associated with gastroschisis outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 551–7.Google Scholar

Nichol, P F, Hayman, A, Pryde, PG, Go, LL, Lund, DP. Meconium staining of amniotic fluid correlates with intestinal peel formation in gastroschisis. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 211–14.Google Scholar

Brown, N, Nardi, M, Greer, RM, et al. Prenatal extra-abdominal bowel dilatation is a risk factor for intrapartum fetal compromise for fetuses with gastroschisis. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 529–33.Google Scholar

South, AP, Marshall, DD, Bose, CL Laughon, MM. Growth and neurodevelopment at 16 to 24 months of age for infants born with gastroschisis. J Perinatol 2008; 28: 702–6.Google Scholar

Adams, SR, Durfee, S, Pettigrew, C, et al. Accuracy of sonography to predict estimated weight in fetuses with gastroschisis. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1753–8.Google Scholar

Japaraj, RP, Hockey, R, Chan, FY: Gastroschisis: can prenatal sonography predict neonatal outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 329–33.Google Scholar

Morrison, JJ, Klein, N, Chitty, LS, et al. Intra-amniotic inflammation in human gastroschisis: Possible aetiology of postnatal bowel dysfunction. BJOG 1998; 105: 1200–4.Google Scholar

Deans, KJ, Mooney, DP, Meyer, MM, Shorter, NA. Prolonged exposure to amniotic fluid does not result in peel formation in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 975–76.Google Scholar

Gamba, P, Midrio, P. Abdominal wall defects: prenatal diagnosis,newborn management and long-term outcomes. Semin Pediatr Surg 2014; 23: 283–90.Google Scholar

Sipes, SL, Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, et al. Fetal gastroschisis complicated by bowel dilation: An indication for imminent delivery? Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 100–3.Google Scholar

Carnaghan, H, Pereira, S, James, CP, et al. Is early delivery beneficial in gastroschisis? J Pediat Surg 2014; 49: 928–33.Google Scholar

Baud, D Lausman, A, Alfaraj, MA, et al. Expectant management compared with elective delivery at 37 weeks for gastroschisis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 990–8.Google Scholar

Huang, J, Kurkchubasche, AG, Carr, SR, et al. Benefits of term delivery in infants with antenatally diagnosed gastroschisis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 695–9.Google Scholar

Harper, LM, Goetzinger, KR, Biggio, JR, Macones, GA. Timing of elective delivery in gastroschisis: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 227–32.Google Scholar

South, AP, Stutey, KM, Meinzen-Derr, J. Metaanalysis of the prevalence of intrauterine fetal death in gastroschisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 114.e1–13.Google Scholar

Nasr, A, Langer, JC; Canadian Paediatric Surgery Network. Influence of location of delivery on outcome in neonates with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 2022–5.Google Scholar

Harris, EL, Minutillo, C, Hart, S, et al. The long term physical consequences of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 1466–70.Google Scholar

Abdel-Latif, ME, Bolisetty, S, Abeywardana, S, Lui, K; Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. Mode of delivery and neonatal survival of infants with gastroschisis in Australia and New Zealand. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43: 1685–90.Google Scholar

Leadbeater, K, Kumar, R, Feltrin, R. Ward reduction of gastroschisis: risk stratification helps optimize the outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26: 1001–5.Google Scholar

Choi, WW, McBride, CA, Bourke, C, et al. Long-term review of sutureless ward reduction in neonates with gastroschisis in the neonatal unit. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 1516–20.Google Scholar

Weinsheimera, RL, Yanchara, NL, Bouchard, SB, et al.; Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network. Gastroschisis closure: does method really matter? J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 874–8.Google Scholar

Shah, R, Woolley, MM. Gastroschisis and intestinal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 788–90.Google Scholar

Mian, SI, Dutta, S, Le, B, et al. Factors affecting survival to intestinal transplantation in the very young pediatric patient. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1287–9.Google Scholar

Kohl, M, Wiesel, A, Schier, F. Familial recurrence of gastroschisis: literature review and data from the population-based birth registry. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 1907–12.Google Scholar

Bollmann, R, Kalache, K, Mau, H, Chaoui, R, Tennstedt, C. Associated malformations and chromosomal defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal Diagn Ther 1995; 10: 52–9.Google Scholar

Slavotinek, AM. The genetics of common disorders. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Med Genet 2014; 57: 418–23.Google Scholar

Fryns, JP, Moerman, F, Goddeeris, P, Bossuyt, C, Van den Berghe, H. A new lethal syndrome with cloudy corneae, diaphragmatic defects and distal limb deformities. Hum Genet 1979; 50: 65–70.Google Scholar

Bargy, F, Beaudoin, S Bardet, P. Fetal lung growth in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006; 21: 39–44.Google Scholar

Peetsold, MG, Heij, HA, Kneepkens, CM, et al. The long-term follow-up of patients with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a broad spectrum of morbidity. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25: 1–17.Google Scholar

Garne, E, Haeusler, M, Barisic, I, et al.; Euroscan Study Group. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evaluation of prenatal diagnosis in 20 European regions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 329–33.Google Scholar

Boyd, PA, Tonks, AM, Rankin, J, et al.; BINOCAR Working Group. Monitoring the prenatal detection of structural fetal congenital anomalies in England and Wales: register-based study. J Med Screen 2011; 18: 2–7.Google Scholar

Colvin, J, Bower, C, Dickinson, JE, Sokol, J. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia. Pediatrics 2005; 116 356–63.Google Scholar

Snijders, RJM, Nicolaides, KH. Ultrasound Markers for Fetal Chromosomal Defects. London: Parthenon, 1996, p. 28.Google Scholar

Danzer, E, Hedrick, HL. Controversies in the management of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2014; 19: 376–84.Google Scholar

Skari, H, Bjornland, K, Frenckner, B, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Scandinavia from 1995 to 1998: predictors of mortality. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 1269–75.Google Scholar

Screenan, C, Etches, P, Osiovich, H. The western Canadian experience with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: perinatal factors predictive of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and death. Pediatr Surg Int 2001; 17: 196–200.Google Scholar

Shanafey, S, Giacomantonio, M, Henteleff, H. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: experience without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Surg 2002; 18: 28–31.Google Scholar

Partridge, EA, Peranteau, W. H, Rintoul, NE, et al. Timing of repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50: 260–2.Google Scholar

Benachi, A, Cordier, AG, Cannie, M, Jani, J. Advances in prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2014; 19: 331–7.Google Scholar

Cordier, AG, Jani, JC, Cannie, MM, et al. Stomach position in the prediction of survival in left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia with or without fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 155–61.Google Scholar

Metkus, AP, Filly, RA, Stringer, MD, et al. Sonographic predictors of survival in fetal diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 148–51.Google Scholar

Jani, J Cannie, M, Sonigo, P, et al. Value of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of postnatal outcome in fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 793–9.Google Scholar

Bebbington, M, Victoria, T, Danzer, E, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging parameters in predicting survival in isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 670–4.Google Scholar

DeKoninck, P, Gomez, O, Sandaite, I, et al. Right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a decade of fetal surgery. BJOG 2015; 122: 940–6.Google Scholar

Deprest, J, Brady, P, Nicolaides, K, et al. Prenatal management of the fetus with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the era of the TOTAL trial. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 338–48.Google Scholar

Patridge, EA, Peranteau, WH, Rintoul, NE, Herkert, LM, Flake, AW. Timing of repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50: 260–2.Google Scholar

Tracy, S, Chen, C. Multidisciplinary long-term follow-up of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a growing trend. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2014; 19: 385–91.Google Scholar

Hunter, AGW, Seaver, LH, Stevenson, RE. Limb–body wall defect. Is there a defensible hypothesis and can it explain all the associated anomalies? Am J Med Genet 2011; 155: 2045–59.Google Scholar

Smrcek, JM, Germer, U, Krokowski, M, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 322–8.Google Scholar

Martinez-Frias, ML, Bermejo, E, Rodriquez-Pinilla, E, Frias, JL. Exstrophy of the cloaca and exstrophy of the bladder: two different expressions of a primary developmental field defect. Am J Med Genet 2001; 99: 261–9.Google Scholar

Carey, JC, Greenbaum, B, Hall, BD. The OEIS complex (omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, spinal defects). Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1978; 14: 253–63.Google Scholar

Austin, PF, Homsy, YL, Gearhart, JP, et al. The prenatal diagnosis of cloacal exstrophy. J Urol 1998; 160: 1179–81.Google Scholar

Goto, S, Suzumori, N, Obayashi, S, et al. Prenatal findings of omphalocele–exstrophy of the bladder–imperforate anus–spinal defects (OEIS) complex. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2012; 52: 179–81.Google Scholar

Gargollo, PC, Borer, JG Contemporary outcomes in bladder exstrophy. Curr Opin Urol 2007; 17: 272–80.Google Scholar

Park, W, Zwink, N, Rösch, WH, et al. Sexual function in adult patients with classic bladder exstrophy: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11: 125.e1–6.Google Scholar

Gargollo, P, Borer, J, Diamond, D, et al. Prospective follow up in patients after complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy. J Urol 2008; 180: 1665–70.Google Scholar

Tiblad, E, Wilson, D Carr, M, Flake, AW, Hedrick, H. OEIS sequence: a rare congenital anomaly with prenatal evaluation and postnatal outcome in six cases. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 141–7.Google Scholar

Vlangos, CN, Siuniak, A, Ackley, T, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of OEIS complex reveals no evidence for a recurrent microdeletion or duplication. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A: 38–49.Google Scholar

Shaw-Smith, C. Oesophageal atresia, tracheooesophageal fistula, and the VACTERL association: review of genetics and epidemiology. J Med Genet 2006; 43: 545–54.Google Scholar

Spaggiari, E, Faure, G, Rousseau, V, et al. Performance of prenatal diagnosis in esophageal atresia. Prenat Diagn 2015; 8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4630.Google Scholar

Kunisaki, SM, Bruch, SW, Hirschl, RB, et al. The diagnosis of fetal esophageal atresia and its implications on perinatal outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2014; 30: 971–7.Google Scholar

Garabedian, C, Verpillat, P, Czerkiewicz, I, et al. Does a combination of ultrasound, MRI, and biochemical amniotic fluid analysis improve prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia? Prenat Diagn 2014, 34, 839–42.Google Scholar

Shulman, A, Mazkereth, R, Zalel, Y, et al. Prenatal identification of esophageal atresia: The role of ultrasonography for evaluation of functional anatomy. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 669–74.Google Scholar

Gross, RE. Atresia of the oesophagus. In Gross, RE (ed.), Surgery of Infancy and Childhood. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1952, p. 75.Google Scholar

Kaufman, RL, Quinton, BA, Ternberg, JL. Imperforate anus, vertebral anomalies and preaxial limb abnormalities. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser 1972; 8: 85–7.Google Scholar

Debost-Legrand, A, Goumy, C, Laurichesse-Delmas, H, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of the VACTERL association using routine ultrasound examination. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103: 880–6.Google Scholar

Carli, D, Garagnani, L, Lando, M, et al. VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, cardiac defects, renal and limb anomalies) association: disease spectrum in 25 patients ascertained for their upper limb involvement. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 458–62.Google Scholar

Jones, KL. Di George sequence. In Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1988, p. 556.Google Scholar

Burge, DM, Shah, K, Spark, P, et al. Contemporary management and outcomes for infants born with oesophageal atresia. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 515–21.Google Scholar

Tomaselli, V, Volpi, ML, Dell’Agnola, CA, et al. Long term evaluation of esophageal function inpatients treated at birth for esophageal atresia. Ped Surg Int 2003; 19: 40–3.Google Scholar

Upadhyaya, VD, Gangopadhyaya, AN, Gupta, DK, et al. Prognosis of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia on the basis of gap length. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23: 767–71.Google Scholar

Spitz, L, Kiely, FM, Morecroft, JA, Drake, DP. Oesophageal atresia: at risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 723–5.Google Scholar

Pinheiro, PFM, Simões e Silva, AC, Pereira, RM. Current knowledge on esophageal atresia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 3662–72.Google Scholar

Kimble, RM, Harding, J, Kolbe, A. Additional congenital anomalies in babies with gut atresia or stenosis: When to investigate and which investigation. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 565–70.Google Scholar

Farmakis, SG, Herman, TE, Siegel, MJ. Congenital pyloric atresia, type B; with junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J Perinatol 2014; 34: 572–3.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Snijders, RJM, Cheng, HH, Gosden, Cl. Fetal gastrointestinal and abdominal wall defects: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther 1992; 7: 102–15.Google Scholar

Dalla Vecchia, LK, Grosfeld, JL, West, KW, et al. Intestinal atresia and stenosis: A 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 490–6.Google Scholar

Escobar, MA, Ladd, AP, Grosfeld, JL, et al. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: Long term follow up over 30 years. J Ped Surg 2004; 39: 867–71.Google Scholar

Burjonrappa, S, Crete, E, Bouchard, S. Comparative outcomes in intestinal atresia: a clinical outcome and pathophysiology analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2011: 27: 437–42.Google Scholar

Virgone, C, D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, et al. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in detecting jejunal and ileal atresia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 523–9.Google Scholar

Seashore, JH, Collins, FS, Markowitz, RI, Seashore, MR. Familial apple peel jejunal atresia: Surgical, genetic and radiographic aspects. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 540–4.Google Scholar

Wax, JR, Hamilton, T, Cartin, A, et al. Congenital jejunal and ileal atresia natural prenatal sonographic history and association with neonatal outcome. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 337–42.Google Scholar

Nyberg, DA, Mack, LA, Patten, RM, Cyr, DR. Fetal bowel: normal sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6: 3–6.Google Scholar

Rintala, RJ, Pakarinen, MP. Imperforate anus: long- and short-term outcome. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008; 17: 79–89.Google Scholar

Hamid, CH, Holland, AJA, Martin, CO. Long-term outcome of anorectal malformations: the patient perspective. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23: 97–102.Google Scholar

Brantberg, A, Blaas, HGK, Haugen, SE, Isaksen, CV, Eik-Nes, SH. Imperforate anus: a relatively common anomaly rarely diagnosed antenatally. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 904–10.Google Scholar

Clements, MB, Chalmers, DJ, Meyers, ML, Vemulakonda, VM. Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal exstrophy: a case report and review of the literature. Urology 2014; 83: 1162–4.Google Scholar

Simon-Bouy, B, Satre, V, Ferec, C, et al. Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: a large French collaborative study of 682 cases. Am J Med Genet 2003; 121A: 209–13.Google Scholar

Scotet, V, Dugueperoux, I, Audrezet, MP, et al. Focus on cystic fibrosis and other disorders evidenced in fetuses with sonographic finding of echogenic bowel: 16-year report from Brittany, France. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 592.e1–6.Google Scholar

Ruiz, MJ, Thatch, KA, Fisher, JC, Simpson, LL, Cowles, RA. Neonatal outcomes associated with intestinal abnormalities diagnosed by fetal ultrasound. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 71–4.Google Scholar

Nama, SH, Kima, SC, Kima, DY, et al. Experience with meconium peritonitis. J Pediatr Surg; 2007: 42: 1822–5.Google Scholar

Al-Kouatly, HB, Chasen, ST, Karam, AK, et al. Factors associated with fetal demise in fetal echogenic bowel. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1039–43.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors. JPediatr Surg 2007; 42: 1797–803.Google Scholar

Tuzovic, L, Anyane-Yeboa, K, Mills, A, Glassberg, K, Miller, R. Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome: case report and review of prenatal ultrasonographic findings. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 74–80.Google Scholar

Richer, J, Milewicz, D, Gow, R, et al. R179H mutation in ACTA2 expanding the phenotype to include prune-belly sequence and skin manifestations. Am J Med Genet 2012; 158A: 664–8.Google Scholar

Gosemann, J, Puri, P. Megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome: systematic review of outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27: 1041–6.Google Scholar

Raofi, V, Beatty, E, Testa, G, et al. Combined living related segmental liver and bowel transplantation for megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome. J Ped Surg 2008; 43: E9–11.Google Scholar

Loinaz, C, Rodríguez, M, Kato, T, et al. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in children with severe gastrointestinal dysmotility. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: 1598–604.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, D, Puri, P. Familial megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29: 947–51.Google Scholar

Zimmer, EZ, Bronshtein, M. Fetal intra-abdominal cysts detected in the first and early second trimester by transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19: 564–7.Google Scholar

Sepulveda, W, Dickens, K, Casabuenas, A, et al. Fetal abdominal cysts in the first trimester: prenatal detection and clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 860–4.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, P, Ade-Ajayi, N, Davenport, M. Natural history and long term follow up of antenatally detected liver cysts. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 494–9.Google Scholar

de Sa, DJ. The alimentary tract. In Wigglesworth, JS, Singer, DB (eds), Textbook of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1991, p. 933.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal size: limb bones. BJOG 2002; 109: 919–29.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Campbell, S, Altman, DG. Measurement of the fetal mandible: feasibility and construction of a centile chart. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 749–56.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Mason, S, Barrett, AN, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate and comprehensive approach. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 656–62.Google Scholar

Hall, CM. International nosology and classification of constitutional disorders of bone (2001). Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 65–77.Google Scholar

Irving, M, Chitty, LS, Mansour, S, Hall, CM. Chondrodysplasia punctata: a clinical diagnostic and radiological review. Clin Dysmorphol 2008; 17: 229–41.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Pajkrt, E, Chitty, LS. Early prenatal diagnosis of skeletal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 115–24.Google Scholar

Nelson, DB, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Twickler, DM. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: sonographic indices associated with adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1085–90.Google Scholar

Orioli, IM, Castilla, EE, Barbosa-Netos, JG. The birth prevalence rates for the skeletal dysplasias. J Med Genet 1986; 23: 328–32.Google Scholar

Pajkrt, E, Cicero, S, Griffin, DR, van Maarle, MC, Chitty, LS. Fetal forearm anomalies: prenatal diagnosis, associations and management strategy. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1084–93.Google Scholar

Orioli, IM, Castilla, EE, Barbosa-Netos, JG. The birth prevalence rates for the skeletal dysplasias. J Med Genet 1986; 23: 328–32.Google Scholar

Khalil, A, Pajkrt, E, Chitty, LS. Early prenatal diagnosis of skeletal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 115–24.Google Scholar

Schramm, T, Gloning, KP, Minderer, S, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 160–70.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Griffin, DR, Meaney, C, et al. New aids for the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia: dysmorphic features, charts of fetal size and molecular confirmation using cell free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 283–9.Google Scholar

Yeh, P, Saeed, F, Paramasivam, G, Wyatt-Ashmead, J, Kumar, S. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis and prediction of lethality for fetal skeletal dysplasias. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 515–18.Google Scholar

Nelson, DB, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Twickler, DM. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: sonographic indices associated with adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1085–90.Google Scholar

Krakow, D, Rimoin, DL. The skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med 2010; 12: 327–41.Google Scholar

Drury, S, Williams, H, Trump, N, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 1010–17.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Mason, S, Barrett, AN, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate and comprehensive approach. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 656–62.Google Scholar

Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic post-mortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513–18.Google Scholar

Arthurs, OJ, Thayyil, S, Addison, S, et al.; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study (MaRIAS) Collaborative Group. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem MRI for musculo-skeletal abnormalities in fetuses and children. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1254–61.Google Scholar

Brown, N, Lumley, J, Tickle, C, Keene, J. Congenital Limb Reduction Defects: Clues from Developmental Biology, Teratology and Epidemiology. London: HMSO, 1996.Google Scholar

Makrydimas, G, Souka, A, Skentou, H, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta and other skeletal dysplasias presenting with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester. Am J Med Genet 2001; 98: 117–20.Google Scholar

Weisz, B, David, AL, Chitty, L, et al. Association of isolated short femur in the mid-trimester fetus with perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 512–16.Google Scholar

Hyett, JA, Griffin, DR. Chitty, LS. Short femora. Achondroplasia or IUGR: use of growth patterns as an aid to diagnosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22 (Suppl 1): S32.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal measurements. In Rodeck, CH, Whittle, M (eds), Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2009, pp. 721–66.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Campbell, S, Altman, DG. Measurement of the fetal mandible: feasibility and construction of a centile chart. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 749–56.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 35–43.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 132–5.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 125–31.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal size: limb bones. BJOG 2002; 109: 919–29.Google Scholar

Irving, M, Chitty, LS, Mansour, S, Hall, CM. Chondrodysplasia punctata: a clinical diagnostic and radiological review. Clin Dysmorphol 2008; 17: 229–41.Google Scholar

Allen, LD, Tynan, MJ, Campbell, S, Anderson, RH. Normal fetal cardiac anatomy: a basis for the echocardiographic detection of abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 1981; 1: 131–9.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Tan, AW, Nesbit, DL, Hall, CM, Rodeck, CH. Sonographic diagnosis of SEDC and double heterozygote of SEDC and achondroplasia: a report of six pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26: 861–5.Google Scholar

Spranger, J. International classification of osteochondrondrodystrophies. The International Working Group on Constitutional Diseases of Bone. Eur J Pediatr 1992; 151: 407–15.Google Scholar

Superti-Furga, A, Bonafe, L, Rimoin, D. Molecular-pathogenetic classification of genetic disorders of the skeleton. Am J Med Genet 2002; 106: 282–93.Google Scholar

Hall, CM. International nosology and classification of constitutional disorders of bone (2001). Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 65–77.Google Scholar

Chitty, LS, Khalil, A, Barrett, AN, et al. Safer, accurate prenatal diagnosis of thanatophoric dysplasia using ultrasound and cell free fetal DNA. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 416–23.Google Scholar

Tavormina, PL, Shiang, R, Thompson, LM, et al. Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nat Genet 1995; 9: 321–8.Google Scholar

Mansour, S, Hall, CM, Pembrey, ME, Young, ID. A clinical and genetic study of campomelic dysplasia. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 415–420.Google Scholar

Mansour, S, Offiah, AC, McDowall, S, et al. The phenotype of survivors of campomelic dysplasia. J Med Genet 2002; 39: 597–602.Google Scholar

Everett, T, Chitty, LS. Cell-free fetal DNA: the new tool in fetal medicine. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 499–507.Google Scholar

Hill, M, Finning, K, Martin, P, et al. Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice. Clin Genet 2011; 80: 68–75.Google Scholar

Sillence, DO, Senn, A, Danks, DM. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1979; 16: 101–16.Google Scholar

Pollitt, R, McMahon, R, Nunn, J, et al. Mutation analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 in patients diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta type I-IV. Hum Mutat 2006; 27: 716.Google Scholar

Thompson, EM, Young, ID, Hall, CM, Pembrey, ME. Recurrence risks and prognosis in severe sporadic osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1987; 24: 390–405.Google Scholar

Cole, WG, Dalgleish, R. Syndrome of the month. Perinatal lethal osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 284–9.Google Scholar

Sillence, DO, Barlow, KK, Cole, WG, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type III: Delineation of the phenotype with reference to genetic heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23: 821–2.Google Scholar

Engelbert, RH, Uiterwaal, CS, Gulmans, VA, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta in childhood: Prognosis for walking. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 397–402.Google Scholar

Smith, R. Severe osteogenesis imperfecta: new therapeutic options? BMJ 2001; 322: 63–4.Google Scholar

Sinico, M, Levaillant, JM, Vergnaud, A, et al. Specific osseous spurs in a lethal form of hypophosphatasia correlated with 3D prenatal ultrasonographic images. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 222–7.Google Scholar

Walkinshaw, SA, Burn, J. The diagnosis and management of pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormality. In Dunlop, W, Calder, AA (eds), High Risk Pregnancy. Guildford: Butterworths, 1992, pp. 323–8.Google Scholar

Mulivor, RA, Mennuti, M, Zackai, EH, Harris, H. Prenatal diagnosis of hypophosphatasia: genetic, biochemical and clinical studies. Am J Hum Genet 1978; 30: 271–82.Google Scholar

Henthorn, PS, Whyte, MP. Infantile hypophosphatasia: successful prenatal assessment by testing for tissue: non-specific alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme gene mutations. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 1001–6.Google Scholar

Mornet, E, Muller, F, Ngo, S, et al. Correlation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) determination and analysis of the tissue non-specific ALP gene in prenatal diagnosis of severe hypophosphatasia. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 755–7.Google Scholar

Elejalde, BR, de Elejalde, MM, Pansch, D. Prenatal diagnosis of Jeune syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1985; 21: 433–8.Google Scholar

Poyner, SE, Bradshaw, WT. Jeune syndrome: considerations for management of asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy. Neonatal Netw 2013; 32: 342–52.Google Scholar

Keppler-Noreuil, KM, Adam, MP, Welch, J, Muilenburg, A, Willing, MC. Clinical insights gained from eight new cases and review of reported cases with Jeune syndrome (asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy). Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A: 1021–32.Google Scholar

Elçioglu, NH, Hall, CM. Diagnostic dilemmas in the short rib: polydactyly syndrome group. Am J Med Genet 2002; 111: 392–400.Google Scholar

Chen, CP, Chang, TY, Tzen, CY, Wang, W. Second-trimester sonographic detection of short rib–polydactyly syndrome type II (Majewski) following an abnormal maternal serum biochemical screening result. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 353–5.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Perez, V, Ide, SE, Strom, TM, et al. Mutations in a new gene in Ellis–van Creveld syndrome and Weyers acrodental dysostosis. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 283–6.Google Scholar

Baujat, G, Le Merrer, M. Ellis–van Creveld syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 27Google Scholar

Wax, JR, Carpenter, M, Smith, W, et al. Second-trimester sonographic diagnosis of diastrophic dysplasia: report of 2 index cases. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 805–8.Google Scholar

Pryde, PG, Bawle, E, Brandt, F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of nonrhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (Conradi–Hünermann syndrome). Am J Med Genet 1993; 47: 426–31.Google Scholar

Curry, CJR, Magenis, RE, Brown, M, et al. Inherited chondrodysplasia punctata due to a deletion of the terminal short arm of an X chromosome. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1010–1015.Google Scholar

Basbug, M, Serin, IS, Ozcelik, B, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata by detection of rhizomelic shortening and bilateral cataracts. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20: 171–4.Google Scholar

Steinberg, SJ, Elçioglu, N, Slade, CM, et al. Peroxisomal disorders: Clinical and biochemical studies in 15 children and prenatal diagnosis in 7 families. Am J Med Genet 1999; 85: 502–10.Google Scholar

Rousseau, F, Bonaventure, J, Legeai-Mallet, L, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 in achondroplasia. Nature 1994; 371: 252–4.Google Scholar

Bellus, GA, Hefferon, TW, Ortiz de Luna, RI, et al. Achondroplasia is defined by recurrent G380R mutations of FGFR3. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 368–73.Google Scholar

Wilkin, DJ, Szabo, JK, Cameron, R, et al. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in sporadic cases of achondroplasia occur exclusively on the paternally derived chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 711–16.Google Scholar

Hunter, AGW, Bankier, A, Rogers, JG, et al. Medical complications of achondroplasia: a multicentre patient review. J Med Genet 1998; 35: 705–12.Google Scholar

Winter, RM, Baraitser, M. The Winter–Baraitser Dysmorphology Database, Version 1.0. London: London Medical Databases, 2006.Google Scholar

Burn, J, Winter, RM, Baraitser, M, et al. The femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies syndrome. J Med Genet 1984; 21: 331–40.Google Scholar

Lenz, W, Zygulska, M, Horst, J. FFU complex: an analysis of 491 cases. Hum Genet 1993; 91: 347–56.Google Scholar

Geipel, A, Berg, C, Germer, U, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of femur-fibula-ulna complex by ultrasound examination at 20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 79–81.Google Scholar

Pajkrt, E, Cicero, S, Griffin, DR, van Maarle, MC, Chitty, LS. Fetal forearm anomalies: prenatal diagnosis, associations and management strategy. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1084–93.Google Scholar

Van Den Berg, DJ, Francke, U. Roberts syndrome: a review of 100 cases and a new rating system for severity. Am J Med Genet 1993; 47: 1104–23.Google Scholar

Stioui, S, Privitera, O, Brambati, B, et al. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of Roberts syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 145–9.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM, Sokolovski, M, Dalloul, M, et al. Fetal clavicle length throughout gestation: a nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 306–10.Google Scholar

Mundlos, S. Cleidocranial dysplasia: clinical and molecular genetics. J Med Genet 1999; 36: 177–82.Google Scholar

Bakalis, S, Sairam, S, Homfray, T, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed talipes equinovarus in an unselected obstetric population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 226–9.Google Scholar

Offerdal, K, Jebens, N, Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH. Prenatal ultrasound detection of talipes equinovarus in a non-selected population of 49 314 deliveries in Norway. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 838–44.Google Scholar

Hageman, ATM, Gabreels, FJM, Liem, KD, et al. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: A report on thirteen cases and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 1993; 115: 95–101.Google Scholar

Hall, JG, Reed, SD, Greene, G. The distal arthrogryposes: delineation of new entities: review and nosologic discussion. Am J Med Genet 1982; 11: 185–239.Google Scholar

Hageman, G, Ippel, EPF, Beemer, FA, et al. The diagnostic management of newborns with congenital contractures: a nosologic study of 75 cases. Am J Med Genet 1988; 30: 883–904.Google Scholar

Hyett, J, Noble, P, Sebire, NJ, et al. Lethal congenital arthrogryposis presenting with increased nuchal translucency at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 310–13.Google Scholar

Witters, I, Moerman, P, Fryns, JP. Fetal akinesia deformation sequence: A study of 30 consecutive in utero diagnoses. Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 23–8.Google Scholar

Newbury-Ecob, R, Leanage, R, Raeburn, JA, Young, ID. Holt–Oram syndrome: a clinical genetic study. J Med Genet 1996; 33: 300–7.Google Scholar

Basson, CT, Cowley, GS, Solomon, SD, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of the Holt–Oram syndrome (heart–hand syndrome). N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 885–91.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, KL, Howell, RT, Bottani, A, et al. Thrombocytopenia–absent radius syndrome: a clinical genetic study. J Med Genet 2002; 39: 876–81.Google Scholar

Klopocki, E, Schulze, H, Strauss, G, et al. Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 80: 232–240.Google Scholar

Labrune, P, Pons, JC, Khalil, M, et al. Antenatal thrombocytopenia in three patients with TAR (thrombocytopenia with absent radii) syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 463–6.Google Scholar

Albers, CA, Newbury-Ecob, R, Ouwehand, WH, Ghevaert, C. New insights into the genetic basis of TAR (thrombocytopenia-absent radii) syndrome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23: 316–23.Google Scholar

Gurrieri, F, Everman, DB. Clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of split-hand/foot malformation: an update. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A: 2860–72.Google Scholar

Penchaszadeh, VB, Negrotti, TC. Ectrodactyly–ectodermal dysplasia–clefting (EEC) syndrome: dominant inheritance and variable expression. J Med Genet 1976; 13: 281–4.Google Scholar

Hyett, JA, Gardiner, G, Stojilkovic-Mikic, T, et al. Reduction in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions by non-invasive determination of fetal sex in early pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 1111–16.Google Scholar

Brace, V, Grant, SR, Brackley, KJ, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome in sacrococcygeal teratomas: a review of cases between 1992 and 1998. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 51–5.Google Scholar

Bromley, B, Benacerraf, BR. Solid masses on the fetal surface of the placenta: differential diagnosis and clinical outcome. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 883–6.Google Scholar

Chiu, HH, Hsu, WC, Shih, JC, et al. The EXIT (ex utero intrapartum treatment) procedure. J Formos Med Assoc 2008; 107: 745–8.Google Scholar

Geipel, A, Krapp, U, Germer, R, et al. Perinatal diagnosis of cardiac tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 17–21.Google Scholar

Hubbard, AM, Adzick, NS, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Congenital chest lesions: diagnosis and characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 43–8.Google Scholar

Hyett, J. Intra-abdominal masses: prenatal differential diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 645–55.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. Perinatal brain tumors: a review of 250 cases. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 333–42.Google Scholar

Kamil, D, Tepelmann, J, Berg, C, et al. Spectrum and outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 296–302.Google Scholar

Koken, G, Yilmazer, M, Kir Sahin, F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a fetal intracranial immature teratoma. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 24: 368–371.Google Scholar

McVicar, M, Margouleff, D, Chandra, M. Diagnosis and imaging of the fetal and neonatal abdominal mass: an integrated approach. Adv Pediatr 1991; 38: 135–149.Google Scholar

Peiro, JL, Sbragia, L, Scorletti, F, Lim, FCY. Perinatal management of fetal tumors. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2015: 11: 151–63.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Carr, SR. Fetal surgery: principles, indications, and evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 817–35.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Williamson, RA, Weiner, CP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fetuses with intracranial defects. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 529–32.Google Scholar

Peiro, JL, Sbragia, L, Scorletti, F, Lim, FY. Perinatal management of fetal tumors. Curr Pediatr Rev 2015; 11: 151–63.Google Scholar

Bruny, J, Crombleholme, TM. Perinatal management of infant tumors and the promise of fetal surgery. Curr Opin Pediatr 2013; 25: 31–9.Google Scholar

Kamil, D, Tepelmann, J, Berg, C, et al. Spectrum and outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 296–302.Google Scholar

Parkes, SE, Muir, KR, Southern, L, et al. Neonatal tumours: a thirty-year population-based study. Med Pediatr Oncol 1994; 22: 309–17.Google Scholar

Nejat, F, Kazmi, SS, Ardakani, SB. Congenital brain tumors in a series of seven patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 2008; 44: 1–8.Google Scholar

Sebire, NJ, Jauniaux, E. Fetal and placental malignancies: prenatal diagnosis and management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 235–44.Google Scholar

Bader, JL, Miller, RW. US cancer incidence and mortality in the first year of life. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133: 157–9.Google Scholar

Gurney, JG, Ross, JA, Wall, DA, et al. Infant cancer in the U.S.: histology-specific incidence and trends, 1973 to 1992. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1997; 19: 428–32.Google Scholar

Werb, P, Scurry, J, Ostor, A, Fortune, D, Attwood, H. Survey of congenital tumors in perinatal necropsies. Pathology 1992; 24: 247–53.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. Perinatal (congenital and neonatal) neoplasms: a report of 110 cases. Pediatr Pathol 1985; 3: 165–216.Google Scholar

Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. The fetus as a patient: surgical considerations. Ann Surg 1991; 213: 279–91.Google Scholar

Wienk, MA, Van Geijn, HP, Copray, FJ, Brons, JT. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal tumors by ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1990; 45: 639–53.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Williamson, RA, Weiner, CP, Sipes, SL, Yuh, WT. Magnetic resonance imaging of fetuses with intracranial defects. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 529–32.Google Scholar

Hubbard, AM. Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal thoracic abnormalities. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 12: 18–24.Google Scholar

Kirkinen, P, Partanen, K, Merikanto, J, et al. Ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 917–22.Google Scholar

Avni, FE, Guibaud, L, Robert, Y, et al. MR imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: diagnosis and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 179–83.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. II. Perinatal brain tumors: a review of 250 cases. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 333–42.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. I. Perinatal brain tumors: a review of 250 cases. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 249–61.Google Scholar

Doren, M, Tercanli, S, Gullotta, F, Holzgreve, W. Prenatal diagnosis of a highly undifferentiated brain tumour: a case report and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 967–71.Google Scholar

Cassart, M, Bosson, N, Garel, C, Eurin, D, Avni, F. Fetal intracranial tumors: a review of 27 cases. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2060–6.Google Scholar

Buetow, PC, Smirniotopoulos, JG, Done, S. Congenital brain tumors: a review of 45 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 793–9.Google Scholar

Di Rocco, C, Iannelli, A, Ceddia, A. Intracranial tumors of the first year of life. A cooperative survey of the 1986–1987 Education Committee of the ISPN. Childs Nerv Syst 1991; 7: 150–3.Google Scholar

Raisanen, JM, Davis, RL. Congenital brain tumors. Pathology 1993; 2: 103–16.Google Scholar

Wakai, S, Arai, T, Nagai, M. Congenital brain tumors. Surg Neurol 1984; 21: 597–609.Google Scholar

Parmar, HA, Pruthi, S, Ibrahim, M, Gandhi, D. Imaging of congenital brain tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2011; 32: 578–89.Google Scholar

Washburne, JF, Magann, EF, Chauhan, SP, Fratkin, JD, Morrison, JC. Massive congenital intracranial teratoma with skull rupture at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 226–8.Google Scholar

DiGiovanni, LM, Sheikh, Z. Prenatal diagnosis, clinical significance and management of fetal intracranial teratoma: a case report and literature review. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 420–2.Google Scholar

Saiga, T, Osasa, H, Hatayama, H, et al. The origin of extragonadal teratoma: case report of an immature teratoma occurring in a prenatal brain. Pediatr Pathol 1991; 11: 759–70.Google Scholar

Ferreira, J, Eviatar, L, Schneider, S, Grossman, R. Prenatal diagnosis of intracranial teratoma. Prolonged survival after resection of a malignant teratoma diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg 1993; 19: 84–8.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM, Onyeije, CI. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal intracranial tumors: a review. Am J Perinatol 1998; 15: 319–28.Google Scholar

ten Broeke, ED, Verdonk, GW, Roumen, FJ. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of an intracranial teratoma influencing management: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 45: 210–4.Google Scholar

Severino, M, Schwartz, ES, Thurnher, MM, et al. Congenital tumors of the central nervous system. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 531–48.Google Scholar

Sahin, FK, Koken, G, Cosar, E, et al. A prenatal diagnosed case of primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23: 267–70.Google Scholar

Czechowski, J, Langille, EL, Varady, E. Intracardiac tumour and brain lesions in tuberous sclerosis. A case report of antenatal diagnosis by ultrasonography. Acta radiologica. 2000; 41: 371–4.Google Scholar

Durfee, SM, Kim, FM, Benson, CB. Postnatal outcome of fetuses with the prenatal diagnosis of asymmetric hydrocephalus. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 263–8.Google Scholar

Levine, D, Barnes, P, Korf, B, Edelman, R. Tuberous sclerosis in the fetus: second-trimester diagnosis of subependymal tubers with ultrafast MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 1067–9.Google Scholar

Drouin, V, Marret, S, Petitcolas, J, et al. Prenatal ultrasound abnormalities in a patient with generalized neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropediatrics 1997; 28: 120–1.Google Scholar

Squires, LA, Constantini, S, Miller, DC, Wisoff, JH. Hypothalamic hamartoma and the Pallister-Hall syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995; 22: 303–8.Google Scholar

Hennekam, RCM, Krantz, ID, Allanson, JE. Syndromes with unusual facies: other syndromes. In Gorlin’s Syndromes of the Head and Neck. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 1153–209.Google Scholar

Sperner, J, Schmauser, I, Bittner, R, Henkes, H, Bassir, C, Sprung, C, et al. MR-imaging findings in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Neuropediatrics 1990; 21: 146–52.Google Scholar

Paternoster, DM, Manganelli, F, Moroder, W, Nicolini, U. Prenatal diagnosis of vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2003; 18: 408–11.Google Scholar

Diguet, A, Laquerriere, A, Eurin, D, et al. Fetal capillary haemangioblastoma: an exceptional tumour. A review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 979–83.Google Scholar

Lee, DY, Kim, YM, Yoo, SJ, et al. Congenital glioblastoma diagnosed by fetal sonography. Childs Nerv Syst 1999; 15: 197–201.Google Scholar

Costa, JM, Ley, L, Claramunt, E, Lafuente, J. Choroid plexus papillomas of the III ventricle in infants. Report of three cases. Childs Nerv Syst 1997; 13: 244–9.Google Scholar

Lippa, C, Abroms, IF, Davidson, R, DeGirolami, U. Congenital choroid plexus papilloma of the fourth ventricle. J Child Neurol 1989; 4: 127–30.Google Scholar

Mamalis, N, Garland, PE, Argyle, JC, Apple, DJ. Congenital orbital teratoma: a review and report of two cases. Surv Ophthalmol 1985; 30: 41–6.Google Scholar

Spinelli, HM, Criscuolo, GR, Tripps, M, Buckley, PJ. Massive orbital teratoma in the newborn. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31: 453–8.Google Scholar

Zwaan, CM, de Waal, FC, Koole, FD, et al. A giant congenital orbital tumor: an unusual presentation of retinoblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol 1994; 23: 507–11.Google Scholar

Steinkuller, PG, Font, RL. Congenital malignant teratoid neoplasm of the eye and orbit: a case report and review of the literature. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 38–42.Google Scholar

Yen, MT, Tse, DT. Congenital orbital cyst detected and monitored by prenatal ultrasonography. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 17: 443–6.Google Scholar

Elsas, FJ, Green, WR. Epibulbar tumors in childhood. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79: 1001–7.Google Scholar

Sherer, DM, Eisenberg, C, Schwartz, BM, Hammerman, RM, Katz, N. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of dacryocystocele: a case and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 479–81.Google Scholar

Anami, A, Fukushima, K, Fujita, Y, et al. Antenatally diagnosed congenital orbital teratoma in which rupture was associated with intrauterine fetal death. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2012; 38: 578–81.Google Scholar

Schubert, EL, Hansen, MF, Strong, LC. The retinoblastoma gene and its significance. Ann Med 1994; 26: 177–84.Google Scholar

Costello, BJ, Edwards, SP, Clemens, M. Fetal diagnosis and treatment of craniomaxillofacial anomalies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 1985–95.Google Scholar

Conran, RM, Kent, SG, Wargotz, ES. Oropharyngeal teratomas: a clinicopathologic study of four cases. Am J Perinatol 1993; 10: 71–5.Google Scholar

Marras, T, Poenaru, D, Kamal, I. Perinatal management of nasopharyngeal teratoma. J Otolaryngol 1995; 24: 310–12.Google Scholar

Smart, PJ, Schwarz, C, Kelsey, A. Ultrasonographic and biochemical abnormalities associated with the prenatal diagnosis of epignathus. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 327–32.Google Scholar

Sagol, S, Itil, IM, Ozsaran, A, Oztekin, K, Ozbek, SS. Prenatal sonographic detection of nasopharyngeal teratoma. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27: 469–73.Google Scholar

McMahon, MJ, Chescheir, NC, Kuller, JA, et al. Perinatal management of a lingual teratoma. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 848–51.Google Scholar

Papageorgiou, C, Papathanasiou, K, Panidis, D, Vlassis, G. Prenatal diagnosis of epignathus in the first half of pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2000; 27: 67–8.Google Scholar

Catalano, PJ, Urken, ML, Alvarez, M, et al. New approach to the management of airway obstruction in “high risk” neonates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 306–9.Google Scholar

Lulla, C, Hegde, A, Thakur, P. Antenatal 3-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of fetal oropharyngeal teratoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36: 305–7.Google Scholar

Gotte, K, Hormann, K, Schmoll, J, Hiltmann, WD. Congenital nasal hemangiopericytoma: intrauterine, intraoperative, and histologic findings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 589–93.Google Scholar

Suciu, N, Serban, A, Toader, O, Oprescu, D, Spataru, RI. Case report of fetal lingual tumor: perinatal care and neonatal surgical intervention. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27: 314–19.Google Scholar

De Biasio, P, Scarso, E, Prefumo, F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a nasal glioma in the mid trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 571–3.Google Scholar

McMahon, MG, Mintz, S. In utero diagnosis of a congenital gingival granular cell tumor and immediate postnatal surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52: 496–8.Google Scholar

Nazeer, T, Ro, JY, Varma, DG, de la Hermosa, JR, Ayala, AG. Chondromyxoid fibroma of paranasal sinuses: report of two cases presenting with nasal obstruction. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 779–82.Google Scholar

Kotler, HS, Gould, NS, Gruber, B. Leiomyoma of the tongue presenting as congenital airway obstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 139–45.Google Scholar

Olutoye, OO, Olutoye, OA. EXIT procedure for fetal neck masses. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24: 386–93.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Carr, SR. Fetal surgery: principles, indications, and evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 817–35.Google Scholar

Wagner, W, Harrison, MR. Fetal operations in the head and neck area: current state. Head & neck. 2002; 24: 482–90.Google Scholar

Bouchard, S, Johnson, MP, Flake, AW, et al. The EXIT procedure: experience and outcome in 31 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 418–26.Google Scholar

Noah, MM, Norton, ME, Sandberg, P, et al. Short-term maternal outcomes that are associated with the EXIT procedure, as compared with cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 773–7.Google Scholar

Kern, C, Ange, M, Morales, , Peiry, B, Pfister, RE. Ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT), a resuscitation option for intra-thoracic foetal pathologies. Swiss Med Weekly 2007; 137: 279–85.Google Scholar

Chiu, HH, Hsu, WC, Shih, JC, et al. The EXIT (ex utero intrapartum treatment) procedure. J Formos Med Assoc 2008; 107: 745–8.Google Scholar

Langer, JC, Tabb, T, Thompson, P, Paes, BA, Caco, CC. Management of prenatally diagnosed tracheal obstruction: access to the airway in utero prior to delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther 1992; 7: 12–6.Google Scholar

Shih, GH, Boyd, GL, Vincent, RD, et al. The EXIT procedure facilitates delivery of an infant with a pretracheal teratoma. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1573–5.Google Scholar

Hirose, S, Farmer, DL, Lee, H, Nobuhara, KK, Harrison, MR. The ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure: Looking back at the EXIT. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 375–80.Google Scholar

Suchet, IB. Ultrasonography of the fetal neck in the second and third trimesters. Part 3. Anomalies of the anterior and anterolateral nuchal region. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995; 46: 426–33.Google Scholar

Suchet, IB. Ultrasonography of the fetal neck in the first and second trimesters. Part 2. Anomalies of the posterior nuchal region. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995; 46: 344–52.Google Scholar

Tsukimori, K, Hojo, S, Kawarabayashi, Y, et al. Fetal neck capillary hemangioma associated with Kasabach–Merritt syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 397–401.Google Scholar

Kaplan, MC, Coleman, BG, Shaylor, SD, et al. Sonographic features of rare posterior fetal neck masses of vascular origin. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 873–80.Google Scholar

Tapper, D, Lack, EE. Teratomas in infancy and childhood. A 54-year experience at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 398–410.Google Scholar

Bezuidenhout, J, Schneider, JW, Hugo, F, Wessels, G. Teratomas in infancy and childhood at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa, 1973 to 1992. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 499–502.Google Scholar

Kountakis, SE, Minotti, AM, Maillard, A, Stiernberg, CM. Teratomas of the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol 1994; 15: 292–6.Google Scholar

Thompson, LD, Rosai, J, Heffess, CS. Primary thyroid teratomas: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases. Cancer 2000; 88: 1149–58.Google Scholar

Elmasalme, F, Giacomantonio, M, Clarke, KD, Othman, E, Matbouli, S. Congenital cervical teratoma in neonates. Case report and review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000; 10: 252–7.Google Scholar

Gundry, SR, Wesley, JR, Klein, MD, Barr, M, Coran, AG. Cervical teratomas in the newborn. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 382–6.Google Scholar

Azizkhan, RG, Haase, GM, Applebaum, H, et al. Diagnosis, management, and outcome of cervicofacial teratomas in neonates: a Childrens Cancer Group study. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 312–6.Google Scholar

Kerner, B, Flaum, E, Mathews, H, et al. Cervical teratoma: prenatal diagnosis and long-term follow-up. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 51–9.Google Scholar

Knox, EM, Muamar, B, Thompson, PJ, et al. The use of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal nuchal tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 672–5.Google Scholar

Hubbard, AM, Crombleholme, TM, Adzick, NS. Prenatal MRI evaluation of giant neck masses in preparation for the fetal exit procedure. Am J Perinatol 1998; 15: 253–7.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Isaacson, G, Blakemore, KJ, et al. Fetal cystic hygroma: cause and natural history. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 822–5.Google Scholar

Chitayat, D, Kalousek, DK, Bamforth, JS. Lymphatic abnormalities in fetuses with posterior cervical cystic hygroma. Am J Med Genet 1989; 33: 352–6.Google Scholar

Gedikbasi, A, Gul, A, Sargin, A, Ceylan, Y. Cystic hygroma and lymphangioma: associated findings, perinatal outcome and prognostic factors in live-born infants. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276: 491–8.Google Scholar

Saller, DN Jr., Canick, JA, Schwartz, S, Blitzer, MG. Multiple-marker screening in pregnancies with hydropic and nonhydropic Turner syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1021–4.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Williamson, RA, Grant, SS. Detection of fetal Turner syndrome with multiple-marker screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 570–3.Google Scholar

Berdahl, LD, Wenstrom, KD, Hanson, JW. Web neck anomaly and its association with congenital heart disease. AM J Med Genet 1995; 56: 304–7.Google Scholar

Abramowicz, JS, Warsof, SL, Doyle, DL, Smith, D, Levy, DL. Congenital cystic hygroma of the neck diagnosed prenatally: outcome with normal and abnormal karyotype. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9: 321–7.Google Scholar

Allanson, JE. Lymphatic system. In Stevenson R, Hall J, Goodman R (eds), Human Malformations and Related Anomalies. 1993, pp. 145–81.Google Scholar

Zimmer, EZ, Drugan, A, Ofir, C, Blazer, S, Bronshtein, M. Ultrasound imaging of fetal neck anomalies: implications for the risk of aneuploidy and structural anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 1055–8.Google Scholar

Clark, EB. Neck web and congenital heart defects: a pathogenic association in 45 X-O Turner syndrome? Teratology 1984; 29: 355–61.Google Scholar

Brumfield, CG, Wenstrom, KD, Davis, RO, Owen, J, Cosper, P. Second-trimester cystic hygroma: prognosis of septated and nonseptated lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 979–82.Google Scholar

Bronshtein, M, Bar-Hava, I, Blumenfeld, I, et al. The difference between septated and nonseptated nuchal cystic hygroma in the early second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 683–7.Google Scholar

Ogita, K, Suita, S, Taguchi, T, et al. Outcome of fetal cystic hygroma and experience of intrauterine treatment. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 105–10.Google Scholar

Shiraishi, H, Nakamura, M, Ichihashi, K, et al. Prenatal MRI in a fetus with a giant neck hemangioma: a case report. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 1004–7.Google Scholar

Lazar, DA, Olutoye, OO, Moise, KJ, et al. Ex-utero intrapartum treatment procedure for giant neck masses–fetal and maternal outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 817–22.Google Scholar

Hartman, GE, Shochat, SJ. Primary pulmonary neoplasms of childhood: a review. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36: 108–19.Google Scholar

Meizner, I, Levy, A. A survey of non-cardiac fetal intrathoracic malformations diagnosed by ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1994; 255: 31–6.Google Scholar

Dembinski, J, Kaminski, M, Schild, R, et al. Congenital intrapulmonary bronchogenic cyst in the neonate: perinatal management. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 509–14.Google Scholar

Jung, AL, Johnson, DG, Condon, VR, Pysher, TJ, Reppucci, P. Congenital chest wall mesenchymal hamartoma. J Perinatol 1994; 14: 487–91.Google Scholar

Easa, D, Balaraman, V, Ash, K, Thompson, B, Boychuk, R. Congenital chylothorax and mediastinal neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 96–8.Google Scholar

Granata, C, Fagnani, AM, Gambini, C, et al. Features and outcome of neuroblastoma detected before birth. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 88–91.Google Scholar

de Filippi, G, Canestri, G, Bosio, U, Derchi, LE, Coppi, M. Thoracic neuroblastoma: antenatal demonstration in a case with unusual post-natal radiographic findings. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 704–6.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR, Crombleholme, TM, Flake, AW, Howell, LJ. Fetal lung lesions: management and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 884–9.Google Scholar

Devine, PC, Malone, FD. Noncardiac thoracic anomalies. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 865–99.Google Scholar

Bromley, B, Parad, R, Estroff, JA, Benacerraf, BR. Fetal lung masses: prenatal course and outcome. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 927–36.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Azar, GB. Thoraco-amniotic shunting. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 153–64.Google Scholar

Blott, M, Nicolaides, KH, Greenough, A. Pleuroamniotic shunting for decompression of fetal pleural effusions. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 798–800.Google Scholar

Stocker, J. Congenital pulmonary airway malformation: a new name for and an expanded classification of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Histopathology 2002; 41 (Suppl 2): 424–31.Google Scholar

Duncombe, GJ, Dickinson, JE, Kikiros, CS. Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 950–4.Google Scholar

Priest, JR, Williams, GM, Hill, DA, Dehner, LP, Jaffe, A. Pulmonary cysts in early childhood and the risk of malignancy. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009; 44: 14–30.Google Scholar

Stocker, JT. Cystic lung disease in infants and children. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2009; 28: 155–84.Google Scholar

Kasales, CJ, Coulson, CC, Meilstrup, JW, et al. Diagnosis and differentiation of congenital diaphragmatic hernia from other noncardiac thoracic fetal masses. Am J Perinatol 1998; 15: 623–8.Google Scholar

Hubbard, AM, Adzick, NS, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Congenital chest lesions: diagnosis and characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 43–8.Google Scholar

Miller, JA, Corteville, JE, Langer, JC. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation in the fetus: natural history and predictors of outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 805–8.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Coleman, B, Hedrick, H, et al. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 331–8.Google Scholar

Schott, S, Mackensen-Haen, S, Wallwiener, M, Meyberg-Solomayer, G, Kagan, KO. Cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung causing hydrops fetalis: case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 293–6.Google Scholar

Stocker, JT, Madewell, JE, Drake, RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 1977; 8: 155–71.Google Scholar

Stocker, JT. An approach to handling pediatric liver tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109 (4 Suppl 1): S67–72.Google Scholar

Tsao, K, Hawgood, S, Vu, L, et al. Resolution of hydrops fetalis in congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation after prenatal steroid therapy. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 508–10.Google Scholar

Peranteau, WH, Wilson, RD, Liechty, KW, et al. Effect of maternal betamethasone administration on prenatal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation growth and fetal survival. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22: 365–71.Google Scholar

Morris, LM, Lim, FY, Livingston, JC, Polzin, WJ, Crombleholme, TM. High-risk fetal congenital pulmonary airway malformations have a variable response to steroids. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 60–5.Google Scholar

Curran, PF, Jelin, EB, Rand, L, et al. Prenatal steroids for microcystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 145–50.Google Scholar

Bernaschek, G, Deutinger, J, Hansmann, M, et al. Feto-amniotic shunting–report of the experience of four European centres. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14: 821–33.Google Scholar

Lee, FL, Said, N, Grikscheit, TC, et al. Treatment of congenital pulmonary airway malformation induced hydrops fetalis via percutaneous sclerotherapy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 264–8.Google Scholar

Bermudez, C, Perez-Wulff, J, Arcadipane, M, et al. Percutaneous fetal sclerotherapy for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 24: 237–40.Google Scholar

Becmeur, F, Horta-Geraud, P, Donato, L, Sauvage, P. Pulmonary sequestrations: prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 492–6.Google Scholar

Dolkart, LA, Reimers, FT, Helmuth, WV, Porte, MA, Eisinger, G. Antenatal diagnosis of pulmonary sequestration: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1992; 47: 515–20.Google Scholar

Buntain, WL, Woolley, MM, Mahour, GH, Isaacs, H, Payne, V. Pulmonary sequestration in children: a twenty-five year experience. Surgery 1977; 81: 413–20.Google Scholar

Hernanz-Schulman, M, Stein, SM, Neblett, WW, et al. Pulmonary sequestration: diagnosis with color Doppler sonography and a new theory of associated hydrothorax. Radiology 1991; 180: 817–21.Google Scholar

Yildirim, G, Gungorduk, K, Aslan, H, Ceylan, Y. Prenatal diagnosis of an extralobar pulmonary sequestration. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 278: 181–6.Google Scholar

Leithiser, RE Jr., Capitanio, MA, Macpherson, RI, Wood, BP. “Communicating” bronchopulmonary foregut malformations. AJR AM J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 227–31.Google Scholar

Morin, L, Crombleholme, TM, D’Alton, ME. Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal thoracic lesions. Semin Perinatol 1994; 18: 228–53.Google Scholar

Morin, L, Crombleholme, TM, Louis, F, D’Alton, ME. Bronchopulmonary sequestration: prenatal diagnosis with clinicopathologic correlation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 6: 479–81.Google Scholar

Thilenius, OG, Ruschhaupt, DG, Replogle, RL, et al. Spectrum of pulmonary sequestration: association with anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in infants. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4: 97–103.Google Scholar

Savic, B, Birtel, FJ, Tholen, W, Funke, HD, Knoche, R. Lung sequestration: report of seven cases and review of 540 published cases. Thorax 1979; 34: 96–101.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS. Fetal thoracic lesions. Semin Pediatr Surg 1993; 2: 103–8.Google Scholar

Bratu, I, Flageole, H, Chen, MF, et al. The multiple facets of pulmonary sequestration. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 784–90.Google Scholar

Weiner, C, Varner, M, Pringle, K, et al. Antenatal diagnosis and palliative treatment of nonimmune hydrops fetalis secondary to pulmonary extralobar sequestration. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 275–80.Google Scholar

Nadas, AS, Ellison, RC. Cardiac tumors in infancy. AM J Cardiol 1968; 21: 363–6.Google Scholar

Geipel, A, Krapp, M, Germer, U, Becker, R, Gembruch, U. Perinatal diagnosis of cardiac tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 17–21.Google Scholar

Chao, AS, Chao, A, Wang, TH, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed cardiac rhabdomyoma: case series and a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 289–95.Google Scholar

Sbragia, L, Paek, BW, Feldstein, VA, et al. Outcome of prenatally diagnosed solid fetal tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 1244–7.Google Scholar

Groves, AM, Fagg, NL, Cook, AC, Allan, LD. Cardiac tumours in intrauterine life. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 1189–92.Google Scholar

DiMario, FJ, Diana, D, Leopold, H, Chameides, L. Evolution of cardiac rhabdomyoma in tuberous sclerosis complex. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1996; 35: 615–19.Google Scholar

Harding, CO, Pagon, RA. Incidence of tuberous sclerosis in patients with cardiac rhabdomyoma. AM J Med Genet 1990; 37: 443–6.Google Scholar

Webb, DW, Thomas, RD, Osborne, JP. Cardiac rhabdomyomas and their association with tuberous sclerosis. Arch Dis Child 1993; 68: 367–70.Google Scholar

de Bustamante, TD, Azpeitia, J, Miralles, M, et al. Prenatal sonographic detection of pericardial teratoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 194–8.Google Scholar

Takach, TJ, Reul, GJ, Ott, DA, Cooley, DA. Primary cardiac tumors in infants and children: immediate and long-term operative results. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 559–64.Google Scholar

Nir, A, Tajik, AJ, Freeman, WK, et al. Tuberous sclerosis and cardiac rhabdomyoma. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 419–21.Google Scholar

Mirlesse, V, Wener, H, Jacquemard, F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in antenatal diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis. Lancet 1992; 340: 1163.Google Scholar

Inoue, Y, Nakajima, S, Fukuda, T, et al. Magnetic resonance images of tuberous sclerosis. Further observations and clinical correlations. Neuroradiology 1988; 30: 379–84.Google Scholar

Benatar, A, Vaughan, J, Nicolini, U, et al. Prenatal pericardiocentesis: its role in the management of intrapericardial teratoma. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 856–9.Google Scholar

Bruch, SW, Adzick, NS, Reiss, R, Harrison, MR. Prenatal therapy for pericardial teratomas. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 1113–5.Google Scholar

Paw, PT, Jamieson, SW. Surgical management of intrapericardial teratoma diagnosed in utero. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 552–4.Google Scholar

Garmel, SH, Crombleholme, TM, Semple, JP, Bhan, I. Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal tumors. Semin Perinatol 1994; 18: 350–65.Google Scholar

Acharya, S, Jayabose, S, Kogan, SJ, et al. Prenatally diagnosed neuroblastoma. Cancer 1997; 80: 304–10.Google Scholar

Jennings, RW, LaQuaglia, MP, Leong, K, Hendren, WH, Adzick, NS. Fetal neuroblastoma: prenatal diagnosis and natural history. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28: 1168–74.Google Scholar

Goldstein, I, Gomez, K, Copel, JA. The real-time and color Doppler appearance of adrenal neuroblastoma in a third-trimester fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 854–6.Google Scholar

Newton, ER, Louis, F, Dalton, ME, Feingold, M. Fetal neuroblastoma and catecholamine-induced maternal hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65 (3 Suppl): 49S–52S.Google Scholar

Wagget, J, Aherne, G, Aherne, W. Familial neuroblastoma: report of two sib pairs. Arch Dis Child 1973; 48: 63–6.Google Scholar

Petit, T, de Lagausie, P, El Ghoneimi, A, Garel, C, Aigrain, Y. Postnatal management of cystic neuroblastoma. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2001; 11: 411–4.Google Scholar

Jaffa, AJ, Many, A, Hartoov, J, Kupferminc, J, Peyser, MR. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of metastatic neuroblastoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 73–7.Google Scholar

Ho, PT, Estroff, JA, Kozakewich, H, et al. Prenatal detection of neuroblastoma: a ten-year experience from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children’s Hospital. Pediatrics 1993; 92: 358–64.Google Scholar

McVicar, M, Margouleff, D, Chandra, M. Diagnosis and imaging of the fetal and neonatal abdominal mass: an integrated approach. Adv Pediatr 1991; 38: 135–49.Google Scholar

Angulo, JC, Lopez, JI, Ereno, C, Unda, M, Flores, N. Hydrops fetalis and congenital mesoblastic nephroma. Child Nephrol Urol 1991; 11: 115–6.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal renal tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 1587–95.Google Scholar

Pinto, E, Guignard, JP. Renal masses in the neonate. Biol Neonate 1995; 68: 175–84.Google Scholar

Reinberg, Y, Anderson, GF, Franciosi, R, et al. Wilms tumor and the VATER association. J Urol 1988; 140(: 787–9.Google Scholar

Beckwith, JB. Wilms’ tumor and other renal tumors of childhood: a selective review from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Pathology Center. Hum Pathol 1983; 14: 481–92.Google Scholar

Matsunaga, E. Genetics of Wilms’ tumor. Hum Genet 1981; 57: 231–46.Google Scholar

Isaacs, H. Fetal and neonatal hepatic tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 1797–803.Google Scholar

Dehner, LP. Hepatic tumors in the pediatric age group: a distinctive clinicopathologic spectrum. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1978; 4: 217–68.Google Scholar

Meirowitz, NB, Guzman, ER, Underberg-Davis, SJ, Pellegrino, JE, Vintzileos, AM. Hepatic hemangioendothelioma: prenatal sonographic findings and evolution of the lesion. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 258–63.Google Scholar

Smith, WL, Ballantine, TV, Gonzalez-Curssi, F. Hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma causing heart failure in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 1978; 13: 183–5.Google Scholar

Kamata, S, Nose, K, Sawai, T, et al. Fetal mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: report of a case. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 639–41.Google Scholar

Kazzi, NJ, Chang, CH, Roberts, EC, Shankaran, S. Fetal hepatoblastoma presenting as nonimmune hydrops. Am J Perinatol 1989; 6: 278–80.Google Scholar

Kanai, N, Saito, K, Homma, Y, Makino, S. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver associated with anomalous dilated and tortuous vessels on the placental surface. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 13: 175–6.Google Scholar

Gonen, R, Fong, K, Chiasson, DA. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of hepatic hemangioendothelioma with secondary nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 485–7.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Crussi, F, Upton, MP, Maurer, HS. Hepatoblastoma. Attempt at characterization of histologic subtypes. Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6: 599–612.Google Scholar

Mejides, AA, Adra, AM, O’Sullivan, MJ, Nicholas, MC. Prenatal diagnosis and therapy for a fetal hepatic vascular malformation. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 850–3.Google Scholar

Hackmon-Ram, R, Wiznitzer, A, Gohar, J, Mazor, M. Prenatal diagnosis of a fetal abdominal cyst. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 91: 79–82.Google Scholar

Hyett, J. Intra-abdominal masses: prenatal differential diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 645–55.Google Scholar

Armentano, G, Dodero, P, Natta, A, Magillo, P, Sugliano, GC. Fetal ovarian cysts: prenatal diagnosis and management. Report of two cases and review of literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1998; 25: 88–91.Google Scholar

Saito, S, Ishida, M. Congenital choledochal cyst (cystic dilatation of the common bile duct). Prog Pediatr Surg 1974; 6: 63–90.Google Scholar

Dewbury, KC, Aluwihare, AP, Birch, SJ, Freeman, NV. Prenatal ultrasound demonstration of a choledochal cyst. Br J Radiol 1980; 53: 906–7.Google Scholar

Benhidjeb, T, Chaoui, R, Kalache, K, Mau, H, Muller, JM. Prenatal diagnosis of a choledochal cyst: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13: 207–10.Google Scholar

Bancroft, JD, Bucuvalas, JC, Ryckman, FC, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994; 18: 142–5.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, TC, Howell, LJ, Flake, AW, Adzick, NS. The management of prenatally diagnosed choledochal cysts. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 1241–3.Google Scholar

Franzek, DA, Strayer, SA, Hull, MT, Yoder, MC, Padilla, LM. Enteric cyst as a cause of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: fetal thoracentesis with fluid analysis. J Clin Ultrasound 1989; 17: 275–9.Google Scholar

Egozi, EI, Ricketts, RR. Mesenteric and omental cysts in children. Am Surg 1997; 63: 287–90.Google Scholar

Gross, SJ, Benzie, RJ, Sermer, M, Skidmore, MB, Wilson, SR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 393–6.Google Scholar

Brace, V, Grant, SR, Brackley, KJ, Kilby, MD, Whittle, MJ. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome in sacrococcygeal teratomas: a review of cases between 1992 and 1998. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 51–5.Google Scholar

McCurdy, CM Jr., Seeds, JW. Route of delivery of infants with congenital anomalies. Clin Perinatol 1993; 20: 81–106.Google Scholar

Chisholm, CA, Heider, AL, Kuller, JA, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Perinatol 1999; 16: 89–92.Google Scholar

Perrelli, L, D’Urzo, C, Manzoni, C, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma. Outcome and management. An analysis of 17 cases. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 179–84.Google Scholar

Altman, RP, Randolph, JG, Lilly, JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey-1973. J Pediatr Surg 1974; 9: 389–98.Google Scholar

Bond, SJ, Harrison, MR, Schmidt, KG, et al. Death due to high-output cardiac failure in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25: 1287–91.Google Scholar

Paek, BW, Jennings, RW, Harrison, MR, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of human fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 503–7.Google Scholar

Graf, JL, Albanese, CT. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. World J Surg 2003; 27: 84–6.Google Scholar

Carney, JA, Thompson, DP, Johnson, CL, Lynn, HB. Teratomas in children: clinical and pathologic aspects. J Pediatr Surg 1972; 7: 271–82.Google Scholar

Kirkinen, P, Heinonen, S, Vanamo, K, Ryynanen, M. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and epithelial tumour marker concentrations are not increased by fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 47–50.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Crussi, F, Winkler, RF, Mirkin, DL. Sacrococcygeal teratomas in infants and children: relationship of histology and prognosis in 40 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1978; 102: 420–5.Google Scholar

Grosfeld, JL, Ballantine, TV, Lowe, D, Baehner, RL. Benign and malignant teratomas in children: analysis of 85 patients. Surgery 1976; 80: 297–305.Google Scholar

Flake, AW. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Semin Pediatr Surg 1993; 2: 113–20.Google Scholar

Holterman, AX, Filiatrault, D, Lallier, M, Youssef, S. The natural history of sacrococcygeal teratomas diagnosed through routine obstetric sonogram: a single institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 899–903.Google Scholar

Nakayama, DK, Killian, A, Hill, LM, et al. The newborn with hydrops and sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 1435–8.Google Scholar

Holcroft, CJ, Blakemore, KJ, Gurewitsch, ED, et al. Large fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas: could early delivery improve outcome? Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 24: 55–60.Google Scholar

Hedrick, HL, Flake, AW, Crombleholme, TM, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal assessment, fetal intervention, and outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 430–8.Google Scholar

Makin, EC, Hyett, J, Ade-Ajayi, N, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: single-center experience (1993–2004). J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 388–93.Google Scholar

Lee, MY, Won, HS, Hyun, MK, et al. Perinatal outcome of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1217–21.Google Scholar

Kay, S, Khalife, S, Laberge, JM, et al. Prenatal percutaneous needle drainage of cystic sacrococcygeal teratomas. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 1148–51.Google Scholar

Graf, JL, Paek, BW, Albanese, CT, et al. Successful resuscitation during fetal surgery. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 1388–9.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Crombleholme, TM, Morgan, MA, Quinn, TM. A rapidly growing fetal teratoma. Lancet 1997; 349: 538.Google Scholar

Arceci, R, Weinstein, HJ. Neoplasia. In Avery, GB, Fletcher, M, MacDonald, MG (eds). Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1994, pp. 1444–68.Google Scholar

Dillon, PW, Whalen, TV, Azizkhan, RG, et al. Neonatal soft tissue sarcomas: the influence of pathology on treatment and survival. Children’s Cancer Group Surgical Committee. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 1038–41.Google Scholar

Ben Arush, MW, Ben Arie, Y, Bialik, V, Meller, I. Limb congenital fibrosarcoma: report of two cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1993; 10: 357–61.Google Scholar

Cristaldi, A, Vigevano, F, Antoniazzi, G, et al. Hemimegalencephaly, hemihypertrophy and vascular lesions. Eur J Pediatr 1995; 154: 134–7.Google Scholar

Roberts, RV, Dickinson, JE, Hugo, PJ, Barker, A. Prenatal sonographic appearances of Klippel–Trenaunay–Weber syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 369–71.Google Scholar

Richards, DS, Williams, CA, Cruz, AC, Hendrickson, JE. Prenatal sonographic findings in a fetus with Proteus syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 47–50.Google Scholar

Berry, SA, Peterson, C, Mize, W, et al. Klippel–Trenaunay syndrome. AM J Med Genet 1998; 79: 319–26.Google Scholar

Hadi, HA, Finley, J, Strickland, D. Placental chorioangioma: prenatal diagnosis and clinical significance. Am J Perinatol 1993; 10: 146–9.Google Scholar

D’Ercole, C, Cravello, L, Boubli, L, et al. Large chorioangioma associated with hydrops fetalis: prenatal diagnosis and management. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 357–60.Google Scholar

Zalel, Y, Weisz, B, Gamzu, R, et al. Chorioangiomas of the placenta: sonographic and Doppler flow characteristics. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 909–13.Google Scholar

Bromley, B, Benacerraf, BR. Solid masses on the fetal surface of the placenta: differential diagnosis and clinical outcome. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 883–6.Google Scholar

Chandy, RG, Korula, A, Seshadri, L. Teratoma of the placenta. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 556–7.Google Scholar

Baergen, RN, Johnson, D, Moore, T, Benirschke, K. Maternal melanoma metastatic to the placenta: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 508–11.Google Scholar

Ross, JA, Jurkovic, D, Zosmer, N, et al. Umbilical cord cysts in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 442–5.Google Scholar

Miller, KA, Gauderer, MW. Hemangioma of the umbilical cord mimicking an omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 810–12.Google Scholar

Gramellini, D, Pedrazzoli, G, Sacchini, C, Montalto, M, Piantelli, G. Color Doppler ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord angiomyxoma. Case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1993; 20: 241–4.Google Scholar

Kamitomo, M, Sueyoshi, K, Matsukita, S, et al. Hemangioma of the umbilical cord: stenotic change of the umbilical vessels. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999; 14: 328–31.Google Scholar

Dorman, SL, Cardwell, MS. Ballantyne syndrome caused by a large placental chorioangioma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1632–3.Google Scholar

Abuhamad, A. Three-dimensional ultrasound with color Doppler imaging of an umbilical cord true knot. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 360.Google Scholar

Haak, MC, Oosterhof, H, Mouw, RJ, Oepkes, D, Vandenbussche, FP. Pathophysiology and treatment of fetal anemia due to placental chorioangioma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 68–70.Google Scholar

Hubinont, C, Bernard, P, Khalil, N, et al. Fetal liver hemangioma and chorioangioma: two unusual cases of severe fetal anemia detected by ultrasonography and its perinatal management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 330–1.Google Scholar

Nicolini, U, Zuliani, G, Caravelli, E, et al. Alcohol injection: a new method of treating placental chorioangiomas. Lancet 1999; 353: 1674–5.Google Scholar

Wanapirak, C, Tongsong, T, Sirichotiyakul, S, Chanprapaph, P. Alcoholization: the choice of intrauterine treatment for chorioangioma. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2002; 28: 71–5.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Reich, H, Romero, R, et al. In utero endoscopic devascularization of a large chorioangioma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 48–52.Google Scholar

Norton, ME, Chauhan, SP, Dashe, JS. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Clinical Guideline #7: nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 127–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.018.Google Scholar

Désilets, V, Audibert, F, Wilson, R, et al. Investigation and management of non-immune fetal hydrops. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 923–38.Google Scholar

Weiner, CP. Fetal hemolytic disease. In James, D, Steer, PJ, Weiner, CP, et al. (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options, 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2011, pp. 209–28.Google Scholar

Smoleniec, JS. Fetal hydrops. In James, D, Steer, PJ, Weiner, CP, et al. (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options, 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2011, pp. 437–48.Google Scholar

Bianchi, D, Crombleholme, TM, D’Alton, ME, Malone, FD. Immune hydrops. In Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient, 2nd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010, pp. 885–92.Google Scholar

Bianchi, D, Crombleholme, TM, D’Alton, ME, Malone, FD. Non-immune hydrops fetalis. In Fetology: Diagnosis and Management of the Fetal Patient, 2nd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010, pp. 893–9Google Scholar

Moise, KJ. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al. (eds), Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal–Fetal Medicine Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2014, pp. 558–68.Google Scholar

Wilkins, I. Nonimmune Hydrops. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al. (eds), Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal–Fetal Medicine Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2014, pp. 569–77.Google Scholar

Moise, KJ. Ultrasound evaluation of hydrops fetalis. In Callen, PW (ed.), Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2008, pp. 676–97.Google Scholar

Gilbert-Barnes, E, Debich-Spicer, D. Fetal Hydrops and Cystic Hygroma. Embryo and Fetal Pathology; Color Atlas with Ultrasound Correlation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 321–34.Google Scholar

Bellini, C, Hennekam, RCM. Non-immune hydrops fetalis: a short review of etiology and pathophysiology. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A: 597–605.Google Scholar

Bellini, C, Hennekam, RCM, Banjola, E. A diagnostic flow chart for non-immune hydrops fetalis. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A: 852–3.Google Scholar

Ng, ZM, Seet, MJ, Erng, MN, et al. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis in a children’s hospital: a six-year series. Singapore Med J 2013; 54: 487–90.Google Scholar

Moreno, CA, Kanazawa, T, Barini, R, et al. Non-immune hydrops fetalis: A prospective study of 53 cases. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A: 3078–86.Google Scholar

Takci, S, Gharibzadeh, M, Yurdakok, M, et al. Etiology and outcome of hydrops fetalis: report of 62 cases. Pediatr Neonatol 2014; 55: 108–13.Google Scholar

Turgal, M, Ozyuncu, O, Boyraz, G, Yazicioglu, A, Sinan Baksac, M. Non-immune hydrops fetalis as a diagnostic and survival problems: what do we tell the parents? J Perinat Med 2015; 43: 353–8. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0094.Google Scholar

Lin, SM, Wang, Ch, Zhu, XY, et al. Clinical Study on 156 cases with hydrops fetalis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2011; 46: 905–10.Google Scholar

Laterre, M, Bernard, P, Vikkula, M, Sznajer, Y. Improved diagnosis in nonimmune hydrops fetalis using a standardized algorithm. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38: 337–43. doi: 10.1002/pd.5243Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Langlois, S, Johnson, JA, et al. Mid-trimester amniocentesis fetal loss rate. J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 194: 586–90.Google Scholar

Tabor, A, Vestergaard, CHF, Lidegaard, O. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 19–24.Google Scholar

Alfireziv, Z, Mujezinovic, F, Sundberg, K. Anmiocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD003252.Google Scholar

Tabor, A, Alfirevic, Z. Update on procedure-related risks for prenatal diagnosis techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 1–7.Google Scholar

Mujezinovic, F, Alfirevic, Z. Analgesia for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11): CD008580.Google Scholar

Mujezinovic, F, Alfirevic, Z. Technique modifications for reducing the risks from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (8): CD008678.Google Scholar

Collins, SL, Impey, L. Prenatal diagnosis: types and techniques. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88: 3–8.Google Scholar

Agarwal, K, Alfirevic, Z. Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systemic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 128–34.Google Scholar

Young, C, von Dadelszen, P, Alfirevic, Z. Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (1): CD000114.Google Scholar

Berry, SJ, Stone, J, Norton, ME, Johnson, D, Berghella, V; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 170–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.014.Google Scholar

Kim, SA, Lee, SM, Hong, JS, et al. Ultrasonographic severity scoring of non-immune hydrops: a predictor of perinatal mortality. J Perinat Med 2015; 43: 53–9. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0208.Google Scholar

Hartge, DR, Weichert, J, Gembicki, M, Krapp, M. Confirmation of etiology in fetal hydrops by sonographic evaluation of fluid allocation patterns. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 195: 128–32.Google Scholar

Wapner, RJ, Martin, CL, Levy, B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2175–84Google Scholar

Reddy, UM, Page, GP, Saade, GR, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2185–93.Google Scholar

Talkowski, ME, Ordulu, Z, Pillalamarri, V, et al. Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample. N Engl J Med 2912; 367: 2226–32.Google Scholar

Yang, Y, Muzny, DM, Reid, JG, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of Mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1502–11.Google Scholar

Biesecker, LG, Green, RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2418–25.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS. Prospects for fetal surgery. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89: 881–6.Google Scholar

Wenstrom, KD, Carr, SR. Fetal surgery: principles, indications and evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 817–35.Google Scholar

Van de Velde, M, De Buck, F. Fetal and maternal analgesia/anesthesia for fetal procedures. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 201–9.Google Scholar

Guibaud, L, Collardeau-Frachon, S, Lacalm, A, et al. Antenatal manifestations of inborn errors of metabolism: prenatal imaging findings. J Inherit Metab Dis 2017; 40: 103–12.Google Scholar

Vianey-Saban, C, Acquaviva, C, Cheillan, D, et al. Antenatal manifestations of inborn errors of metabolism: biological diagnosis. J Inherit Metab Dis 2016; 39: 611–24.Google Scholar

Bruwer, Z, Al Riyami, N, Al Dughaishi, T, et al. Inborn errors of metabolism in a cohort of pregnancies with non-immune hydrops fetalis: a single center experience. J Perinatal Med 2017; doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0124.Google Scholar

Yuan, SM. Cardiac etiologies of hydrops fetalis. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2017; 1: 67–72.Google Scholar

Yuan, SM. Congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia. J Perinatal Med 2017; doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0407.Google Scholar

Gilby, DM, Mee, JB, Kamlin, COF, et al. Outcomes following antenatal identification of hydrops fetalis: a single-centre experience from 2001 to 2012. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019; 104: F253–8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313604.Google Scholar

Sparks, TN, Thao, K, Lianoglou, BR, et al. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis: identifying the underlying genetic etiology. Genet Med 2019; 21: 1339–44. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0352-6.Google Scholar

Meng, D, Li, O, Hu, X, et al. Etiology and outcome of non-immune hydrops fetalis in southern China: report of 1004 cases. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 10726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47050-6.Google Scholar

Liu, H, Zhang, H, Tong, XM. Clinical features and prognosis of neonates with nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2019; 21: 253–8.Google Scholar

McPherson, E. Hydrops fetalis in a cohort of 3,137 stillbirths and second trimester miscarriages. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179: 2338–42. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61340.Google Scholar

Mardy, AH, Chetty, SP, Norton, ME, Sparks, TN. A system-based approach to the genetic etiologies of non-immune hydrops fetalis. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39: 732–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5479.Google Scholar

Mardy, AH, Rangwala, N, Hernandez-Cruz, Y, et al. Utility of chromosomal microarray for diagnosis in cases of nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40: 492–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5617.Google Scholar

Wu, Q, Ma, X, Shi, H, et al. Genetic analysis of a family with recurrent hydrops fetalis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 2019; 36: 1028–30. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2019.10.020.Google Scholar

Shanes, E, Propst, L, Ouyang, DW, Ernst, LM. Recurrent non immune fetal hydrops associated with IPEX syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2019; 22: 465–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1093526619834809.Google Scholar

Monteiro, FP, Curry, CJ, Hevner, R, et al. Biallelic loss of function varients in ATP1A2 cause hydrops fetalis, microcephaly, arthrogryposis and extensive cortical malformations. Eur J Med Genet 2020; 63: 103624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.01.014.Google Scholar

Swearingen, C, Colvin, ZA, Leuthner, SR, et al. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Clin Perinatol 2020; 47: 105–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2019.10.001.Google Scholar

Desilets, V, De Bie, I, Audibert, F. No. 363. Investigation and management of non-immune fetal hydrops. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018; 40: 1077–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.011.Google Scholar

Zhao, Z, Reece, EA. New concepts in diabetic embryopathy. Clin Lab Ned 2013; 33: 207–233.Google Scholar

Teramo, K, Klemetti, M, Tikkanen, M, Nuutila, M. Maternal diabetes and fetal hypoxia. Duodecim 2013; 129: 228–34.Google Scholar

Vento, M, Terramo, K. Evaluating the fetus at risk for cardiopulmonary compromise. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18: 324–9.Google Scholar

Khoo, CM, Lee, KO. Endocrine emergencies in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27: 885–91.Google Scholar

Taylor, PN, Vaidya, B. Side effects of anti-thyroid drugs and their impact on the choice of treatment for thyrotoxicosis in pregnancy. Eur Thyroid J 2012; 1: 176–85.Google Scholar

Clementi, M, Di Gianantonio, E, Cassina, M, et al. Treatment of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy and birth defects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: E337–41.Google Scholar

Gatta, A, Verardo, A, Bolognesi, M. Hypoalbuminemia. Intern Emerg Med (2013); 7 (Suppl 3): S193–9.Google Scholar

Lata, I. Hepatobiliary diseases during pregnancy and their management: an update. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013; 3: 175–82.Google Scholar

Horowitz, KM, Ingardia, CJ, Borgida, AF. Anemia in pregnancy. Clin Lab Med 2013; 33: 281–91.Google Scholar

Räisänen, S, Kancherla, V, Gissler, M, Kramer, MR, Heinonen, S. Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with moderate or severe maternal anaemia based on parity in Finland during 2006–10. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014; 28: 372–80.Google Scholar

Bili, E, Tsolakidis, D, Stangou, S, Tarlatzis, B. Pregnancy management and outcome in women with chronic kidney disease. Hippokratia 2013, 17: 163–8.Google Scholar

Nadeau-Fredette, AC, Hladunewich, M, Hui, D, Keunen, J, Chan, CT. End-stage renal disease and pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20: 246–52.Google Scholar

Mosquera, C, Miller, RS, Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Semin Perinat 2012; 2: 182–9.Google Scholar

Simpson, LL; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.880. Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 392.Google Scholar

Lewi, L, Deprest, J, Hecher, K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am J Obset Gynecol 2013; 208: 19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.025.Google Scholar

Baud, B, Windrim, R, Van Mieghem, T, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a frequently missed diagnosis with important consequences. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 205–9.Google Scholar

Roberts, D, Nielson, JP, Kilby, MD, Gates, S. Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (1): CD002073.Google Scholar

Van Mieghem, T, De Heus, R, Lewi, L, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 498–506.Google Scholar

Has, R, Kalelioglu, I, Corbacioglu Esmer, A, et al. Stage-related outcome after fetoscopic laser ablation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 287–92.Google Scholar

Weingertner, AS, Kohler, A, Mager, C, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation in 100 consecutive monochorionic pregnancies with severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2011; 40: 444–51.Google Scholar

Rustico, MA, Lanna, MM, Faiola, S, et al. Fetal and maternal complications after selective fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a single-center experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 170–8.Google Scholar

Khalek, N, Johnson, MP, Bebbington, MW. Fetoscopic laser therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22: 18–23.Google Scholar

Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Doyle, P, Harrington, K, Nicolaides, K. Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of fetal circulation in arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 1994; 91: 129–38.Google Scholar

Jelin, E, Hirose, S, Rand, L, et al. Perinatal outcomes of conservative management versus fetal intervention for TRAP with small acardiac twin. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 138–41.Google Scholar

Oliver, ER, Coleman, BG, Goff, DA, et al. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a new method of parabiotic twin mass estimation correlated with pump twin compromise. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 2115–23.Google Scholar

Ilagan, JG, Wilson, RD, Bebbington, M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following bipolar umbilical cord cauterization for selective termination in complicated monochorionic multiple gestations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23: 153–8.Google Scholar

Lee, H, Bebbington, M, Crombleholme, TM et al. The North American Fetal Therapy Network Registry data on outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33: 224–9.Google Scholar

Lu, J, Ting, YH, Law, KM, Lau, TK, Leung, TY. Radiofrequency ablation for selective reduction in complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 34: 211–16.Google Scholar

Peeters, SHP, Devlieger, R, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Fetal surgery in complicated monoamniotic pregnancies: case series and systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 586–91.Google Scholar

Prefumo, F, Fichera, A, Zanardini, C, Frusca, T. Fetoscopic cord transaction for treatment of monoamniotic twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 233–5.Google Scholar

Stephenson, CD, Temming, LA, Pollack, R, Iannitti, DA. Microwave ablation for twin-reversed perfusion sequence: a novel application of technology. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 38: 35–40. doi: 10.1159/000369384.Google Scholar

Cabassa, P, Fichera, A, Prefumo, F, et al. The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 166: 127–32.Google Scholar

Pagani, G, D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, et al. Intrafetal laser treatment for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: cohort study and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 6–14.Google Scholar

Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Sotiriadis, A, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: case study and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 35: 267–79.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 8: 550–5.Google Scholar

Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 136–44.Google Scholar

Lim, FY, Coleman, A, Polzin, W, et al. Giant chorioangiomas: perinatal outcomes and techniques in fetoscopic devascularization. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 37: 18–23.Google Scholar

Donofrio, MD, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 2183–242. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d.Google Scholar

Sekarski, N, Jeijboom, EJ, Di Bernardo, S, Ksontini, TB, Mivelaz, Y. Perinatal arrhythmias. Eur J Pediatr 2014; 173: 983–96.Google Scholar

MacColl, CE, Manlhiot, C, Page, C, et al. Factors associated with in utero demise of fetuses that have underlying cardiac pathologies. Pediatr Cardiol 2014; 35: 1403–14. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0943-1.Google Scholar

Cetiner, N, Altunyuva Usta, S, Akalin, F. Coronary arteriovenous fistula causing hydrops fetalis. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 487281.Google Scholar

Rasiah, SV, Ewer, AK, Miller, P, Kilby, MD. Prenatal diagnosis, management and outcome of fetal dysrhythmia: a tertiary fetal medicine centre experience over an eight-year period. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 30: 122–7.Google Scholar

Kang, SL, How, D, Coleman, M, Roman, K, Gnanapragasam, J. Foetal supraventricular tachycardia with hydrops fetalis: a role for direct intraperitoneal amiodarone. Cardiol Young 2014; 9: 1–7.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Hedrick, H, Flake, AQ, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas: prenatal surveillance, growth and pregnancy outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25: 15–20.Google Scholar

Coleman, A, Shaaban, A, Keswani, S, Lim, FY. Sacrococcygeal teratoma growth rate predicts adverse outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 985–9.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 1–8.Google Scholar

Roybal, JL, Moldenhauer, JS, Khalek, N, et al. Early delivery as an alternative management strategy for selected high risk fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 1325–32.Google Scholar

Van Meighem, T, Al-Ibrahim, A, Deprest, J, et al. Minimally invasive therapy for fetal sacrococcyeal teratoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 611–19.Google Scholar

Fuchs, F, Michaux, K, Rousseau, C, Ovetchkine, P, Audibert, F. Syphilis infection: an uncommon etiology of infectious nonimmune fetal hydrops with anemia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2016; 39: 74–7. doi: 10.1159/000364804. Epub 2014 Aug 14.Google Scholar

Mace, G, Sauvan, M, Castaigne, V, et al. Clinical presentation and outcome of 20 fetuses with parvovirus B19 infection complicated by severe anemia and/or fetal hydrops. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1023–30.Google Scholar

Kyeong, KS, Won, HS, Lee, MY, et al. Clinical features of 10 fetuses with prenatally diagnosed parvovirus B19 infection and fetal hydrops. Fetal Pediat Pathol 2015; 34: 49–56.Google Scholar

Lindenburg, IT, van Klink, JM, Smits-Wintjens, VE, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental and cardiovascular outcome after intrauterine transfusions for fetal anaemia: a review. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 815–22.Google Scholar

Yuan, SM, Xu, ZY. Fetal arrhythmias: prenatal evaluation and intrauterine therapeutics. Ital J Pediatr 2020; 46: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-0785-9.Google Scholar

Refaat, M, Ei, Dick J, Sabra, M, et al. Sotalol as an effective adjunct therapy in the management of supraventricular tachycardia induced fetal hydrops fetalis. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2019; 10.3233/NPM-190268. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-190268.Google Scholar

Nagel, HT, de Haan, TR, Vandenbussche, FP, Oepkes, D, Walther, FJ. Long-term outcome after fetal transfusion for hydrops associated with parvovirus B19 infection. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 42–7.Google Scholar

Hichijo, A, Morine, M. A case of fetal parvovirus B19 myocarditis that caused terminal heart failure. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 463571. doi: 10.1155/2014/463571.Google Scholar

Li, JJ, Henwood, T, Van Hal, S, Charlton, A. Parvovirus infection: an immunohistochemical study using fetal and placental tissue. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2015; 18: 30–9. doi: 10.2350/14-05-1495-OA.1.Google Scholar

Grabowska, K, Wilson, RD. Fetal lung growth, development, and lung fluid: clinical management of pleural effusion and pulmonary pathology. In Kilby, MD, Oepkes, D, Johnson, A (eds), Fetal Therapy: Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical benefits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 282–300.Google Scholar

Witlox, RS, Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D. Prenatal interventions for fetal lung lesions. Prenat Diag 2011; 31: 628–36.Google Scholar

Mann, S, Johnson, MP, Wilson, RD. Fetal thoracic and bladder shunts. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 14: 28–33.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS. Management of fetal lung lesions. Clin Perinatol 2009; 36: 363–76.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Ramalho, AS, de Freitas, RC, et al. Three dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of fetal lung volume as a prognostic factor in primary pleural effusion. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1731–9.Google Scholar

Zamora, IJ, Sheikh, F, Cassady, CI, et al. Fetal MRI lung volumes are predictive of perinatal outcomes in fetuses with congenital lung masses. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 853–8.Google Scholar

Rodeck, CH, Fisk, NM, Fraser, DI, Nicolini, U. Long-term in utero drainage of fetal hydrothorax. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1135–8.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Azar, GB. Thoraco-amniotic shunting. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5: 153–64.Google Scholar

Bernaschek, G, Deutinger, J, Hansmann, M, et al. Feto-amniotic shunting: report of the experience of four European centres. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14: 821–33.Google Scholar

Picone, O, Benachi, A, Mandelbrot, L, et al. Thoracoamniotic shunting for fetal pleural effusions with hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 2047–50.Google Scholar

Smith, RP, Illanes, S, Denbow, ML, Soothill, PW. Outcome of fetal pleural effusions treated by thoracoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 63–6.Google Scholar

Vanspranghels, R, Houfflin-Debarge, V, Vaast, P, et al. Does an intrauterine exchange transfusion improve the fetal prognosis in parvovirus infection cases? Transfusion 2019; 59: 185–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14968.Google Scholar

Grubman, O, Hussain, FN, Nelson, Z, Brustman, L. Maternal parvovirus B19 infection causing first-trimester increased nuchal transluncency and fetal hydrops. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2019; 2019: 3259760. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3259760.Google Scholar

Rustico, MA, Lanna, M, Coviello, D, Smoleniec, J, Nicolini, U. Fetal pleural effusion. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 793–9.Google Scholar

Yinon, Y, Grisaru-Granovsky, S, Chadha, V, et al. Perinatal outcome following fetal chest shunt insertion for pleural effusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 58–64.Google Scholar

Caserio, S, Gallego, C, Martin, P, et al. Congenital chylothorax: from foetal life to adolescence. Acta Paediatr 2010; 99: 1571–7.Google Scholar

Walsh, J, Mahony, R, Higgins, S, et al. Thoraco-amniotic shunting for fetal pleural effusion: a case series. Ir Med J 2011; 104: 205–208.Google Scholar

Takahashi, Y, Kawabata, I, Sumie, M, et al. Thoracoamniotic shunting for fetal pleural effusions using a double-basket shunt. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1282–7.Google Scholar

Pellegrinelli, JM, Kohler, A, Hohler, M, Weingertner, AS, Favre, R. Prenatal management and thoracoamniotic shunting in primary fetal pleural effusions: a single centre experience. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 467–71.Google Scholar

Petersen, S, Kaur, R, Thomas, JT, Cincotta, R, Gardener, G. The outcome of isolated primary fetal hydrothorax: a 10-year review from a tertiary center. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 34: 69–76.Google Scholar

White, SB, Tutton, SM, Rilling, WS, et al. Percutaneous in utero thoracoamniotic shunt creation for fetal thoracic abnormalities leading to nonimmune hydrops. J Vas Interv Radiol 2014; 25: 889–94.Google Scholar

Derderian, SC, Trivedi, S, Farrell, J, et al. Outcomes of fetal intervention for primary hydrothorax. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49: 900–3.Google Scholar

Nowakowska, D, Gaj, Z, Grzesiak, M, Gulczyńska, E, Wilczyński, J. Successful treatment of fetal bilateral primary chylothorax: report of the two cases. Ginekol Pol 2014; 85: 708–12.Google Scholar

Miyoshi, T, Katsuragi, S, Ikeda, T, et al. Retrospective review of thoracoamniotic shunting using a double-basket catheter for fetal chylothorax. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 34: 19–25.Google Scholar

Reiterer, R, Grossauer, K, Morris, N, Uhrig, S, Resch, B. Congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasis. Paediatr Respir Rev 2014; 15: 275–80.Google Scholar

Toru, HS, Sanhal, CY, Yilmaz, GT, et al. Rare congenital pulmonary malformation with diagnostic challenging: congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia, report of four autopsy cases and review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1457–60. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.956719.Google Scholar

Gray, M, Kovatis, KZ, Stuart, T, et al. Treatment of congenital pulmonary lymphangiectasia using ethiodized oil lymphangiography. J Perinatol 2014; 34: 720–2.Google Scholar

Yang, YS, Ma, GC, Shih, JC, et al. Experimental treatment of bilateral fetal chylothorax using in-utero pleurodesis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 56–62.Google Scholar

Kim, JE, Lee, C, Park, KI, et al. Successful pleurodesis with OK_432 in preterm infants with persistent pleural effusion. Korean J Pediatr 2012; 55: 177–80Google Scholar

Leung, VKT, Suen, SSH, Ting, YH, et al. Intrapleural injection of OK-432 as the primary in-utero treatment for fetal chylothorax. Hong Kong Med J 2013; 18: 156–9.Google Scholar

Mallmann, MR, Geipel, A, Bludau, M, et al. Bronchopulmonary sequestration with massive pleural effusion: pleuroamniotic shunting vs intrafetal vascular laser ablation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 441–6.Google Scholar

Cass, DL, Crombleholme, TM, Howell, LJ, et al. Cystic lung lesions with systemic arterial blood supply: a hybrid of congenital cystic adenomatous malformation and bronchopulmonary sequestration. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 32: 986–90.Google Scholar

Leninger, BJ, Haight, C. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the left lower lobe with compression of the remaining lung tissue in a newborn. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1973; 12: 182–6.Google Scholar

Carter, R. Pulmonary sequestration. Ann Thorac Surg 1969; 7: 68–88.Google Scholar

Roggin, KK, Breuer, CK, Carr, SR, et al. The unpredictable character of congenital cystic lung lesions. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35; 801–5.Google Scholar

Laberge, JM, Flageole, H, Pugash, D, et al. Outcome of the prenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid lung malformation: a Canadian experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 178–86.Google Scholar

Gornall, AS, Budd, JLS, Draper, ES, Konje, JC, Kurinczuk, JJ. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: accuracy of prenatal diagnosis, prevalence and outcome in a general population. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 997–1002.Google Scholar

Stocker, TJ, Manewell, JE, Drake, RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 1977; 8: 155–71.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR, Glick, PL, et al. Fetal cystic adenomatoid malformation: prenatal diagnosis and natural history. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20: 483–8.Google Scholar

Liu, YP, Chen, CP, Shih, SL, et al. Fetal cystic lung lesions: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010; 45: 592–600.Google Scholar

Davonport, M, Warne, SA, Cacciaguerra, S, et al. Current outcome of antenatally diagnosed cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 549–56.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR, Crombleholme, TM, Flake, AW, Howell, LJ. Fetal lung lesions: management and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 884–9.Google Scholar

De Santis, M, Masini, L, Noia, G, et al. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: antenatal ultrasound findings and fetal-neonatal outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2000; 15: 246–50.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Coleman, B, Hedrick, H, et al. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 2002: 37: 331–8.Google Scholar

Chon, AH, Chmait, HR, Korst, LM, et al. Long-term outcomes after thoracoamniotic shunt for pleural effusions with secondary hydrops. J Surg Res 2019; 233: 304–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.022.Google Scholar

Suyama, F, Ozawa, K, Ogawa, K, et al. Fetal lung size after thoracoamniotic shunting refelects survival in primary fetal thorax with hydrops. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44: 1216–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13657.Google Scholar

Guenot, C, Dubrit, K, Lepigeon, K, et al. Effect of maternal betamethasone on hydrops fetalis caused by extralobar pulmonary sequestration: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 39: 120–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1428541.Google Scholar

Chon, AH, Korst, LM, Abdel-Sattar, M, et al. Types II and III congenital airway malformation with hydrops treated in utero with percutaneous sclerotherapy. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38: 493–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5266.Google Scholar

Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Cassady, CI, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal lung masses. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 292–8.Google Scholar

Parenteau, WH, Wilson, RD, Leichty, KW, et al. Effect of maternal betamethasone administration on prenatal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation growth and fetal survival. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22: 365–71.Google Scholar

Curran, PF, Jelin, EB, Rand, L, et al. Prenatal steroids for microcystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 145–50.Google Scholar

Brown, RN. Multiple steroid courses result in tumor shrinkage in congenital pulmonary airway malformation (congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation) Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 989–91.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD. In utero therapy for fetal thoracic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 619–25.Google Scholar

Thorpe-Beeston, JG, Nicolaides, KH. Cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: prenatal diagnosis and outcome. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14: 677–88Google Scholar

Dommergues, M, Louis-Sylvestre, C, Mandelbrot, L, et al. Congenital adenomatoid malformation of th lung: when is active fetal therapy indicated? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 953–8.Google Scholar

Morikawa, M, Yamada, H, Oluyama, K, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation type I of the lung: a report of five cases. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2003; 43: 72–8.Google Scholar

Wilson, RD, Baxter, JK, Johnson, MP, et al. Thoracoamniotic shunts: fetal treatment of pleural effusions and congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19: 413–20.Google Scholar

Illanes, S, Hunter, A, Evans, M, Cusick, E, Soothill, P. Prenatal diagnosis of echogenic lung: evolution and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 26: 145–9.Google Scholar

Ierullo, AM, Ganapathy, R, Crowley, S, et al. Neonatal outcome of antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 26: 150–3.Google Scholar

Cavoretto, P, Molina, F, Poggi, S, Davonport, M, Nicolaides, KH. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of echogenic fetal lung lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 769–83.Google Scholar

Baud, B, Windrim, R, Kachura, JR, et al. Minimally invasive fetal therapy for hydrop lung masses: three different approaches and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Oct; 4: 440–8.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Pilu, G, Jeantry, P, et al. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. In Romero, R, Pilu, G, Geantry, P, Ghidini, A, Hobbins, JC (eds), Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Anomalies. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1988, pp. 414–26.Google Scholar

Wilkins, I. Nonimmune hydrops. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R (eds), Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1999, pp. 769–82.Google Scholar

Jones, DC. Nonimmune fetal hydrops: diagnosis and obstetrical management. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 447–61.Google Scholar

Ville, YG, Nowakowska, D. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations by ultasound. In Milunsky, A, Milunsky, JM (eds), Genetic Disorders of the Fetus: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment, 6th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, p. 860.Google Scholar

Danzer, E, Siegle, J, D’Agostino, JA, et al. Early neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with high-risk fetal lung lesions. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 210–15.Google Scholar

Vrecenak, JD, Howell, LJ, Khalek, N, et al. Outcomes of prenatally diagnosed lung lesions in multigestational pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36: 312–19.Google Scholar

Désilets, V, Oligny, LL, Wilson, RD, et al. Fetal and perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal karyotype. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33: 1047–57.Google Scholar

Swenson, E, Schema, L, McPherson, E. Radiographic evaluation of stillbirth: what does it contribute? Am J Med Genet A 2014; 164A: 2270–5.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, Z, Khatib, N, Zimmer, EZ, Bronshtein, M. Fetal demise in the early second trimester: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2015; 43: 109–12.Google Scholar

Nicolas, CT, Lynch-Salamon, D, Bendel-Stenzel, E, et al. Fetoscopy-assisted percutaneous decompression of the distal trachea and lungs reverses hydrops fetalis and fetal distress in a fetus with laryngeal atresia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019; 46: 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500455.Google Scholar

King, AJ, Higgs, DR. Potential new approaches to the management of the Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis syndrome: the most severe form of α-thalassemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018; 2018: 353–60. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.353.Google Scholar

Jatavan, P, Chattipakorn, N, Tongsong, T. Fetal hemoglobin Bart’s hydrops fetalis: pathophysiology, prenatal diagnosis and possibility of intrauterine treatment. J Mat Fetal Neonat Med 2018; 31: 946–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.1301423.Google Scholar

Yang, J, Peng, CF, Qi, Y, et al. Noninvasive prenatal detection of hemoglobin Bart hydrops fetalis via maternal plasma dispensed with parental haplotyping using the semiconductor sequencing platform. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222: 185.e1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.044.Google Scholar

Sudrié-Arnaud, B, Marguet, F, Patrier, S, et al. Metabolic causes of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: a next-generation sequencing panel as a first-line investigation. Clin Chim Acta 2018; 481: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.02.023.Google Scholar

Michael, E, Hedberg-Oldfors, C, Wilmar, P, et al. Long-term follow-up and characteristic pathological findings in severe nemaline myopathy due to LMOD3 mutations. Neuromuscul Disord 2019; 29: 108–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2018.12.009.Google Scholar

Schlotawa, L, Dierks, T, Christoph, S, et al. Severe neonatal multiple sulfatase deficiency presenting with hydrops fetalis in a preterm birth patient. JIMD Rep 2019; 49: 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12074.Google Scholar

Lee, K, Fisher, R, Quinonez, SC, Ahmad, A. Infantile onset Pompe disease presenting with non-immune hydrops fetalis. Mol Genet Metab Rep 2019; 21: 100503; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100503.Google Scholar

Berger, VK, Sparks, TN, Jelin, AC, et al. Non-immune hydrops fetalis: do placentomegaly and polyhydramnios matter? J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 1185–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14462.Google Scholar

Chan, WY, Leung, AW, Luk, CW, et al. Outcomes and morbidities of patients who survive haemoglobin Bart’s hydrops fetalis syndrome: 20-year retrospective review. Hong Kong Med J 2018; 24: 107–18. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj176336.Google Scholar

MacDorman, MF, Kirmeyer, S. Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57 (8): 1–19.Google Scholar

National Center for Health Statistics Model state vital statistics act and regulations. 1992 Revision. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/mvsact92b.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 748–61.Google Scholar

Stanton, C, Lawn, JE, Rahman, H, Wilczynska-Ketende, K, Hill, K. Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries. Lancet 2006; 367: 1487–94.Google Scholar

Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Pattinson, R, et al. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet 2011; 377: 1448–63.Google Scholar

MacDorman, MF, Gregory, EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64(8): 1–24.Google Scholar

Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011; 306: 2459–68.Google Scholar

Reddy, UM, Ko, CW, Willinger, M. Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 764–70.Google Scholar

Sharma, PP, Salihu, HM, Oyelese, Y, Ananth, CV, Kirby, RS. Is race a determinant of stillbirth recurrence? Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 391–7.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Scorza, WE, Knuppel, RA. Prenatal care and black-white fetal death disparity in the United States: heterogeneity by high-risk conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 483–9.Google Scholar

Arias, E, Anderson, RN, Kung, HC, Murphy, SL, Kochanek, KD. Deaths: final data for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52 (3): 1–115.Google Scholar

Frøen, JF, Arnestad, M, Frey, K, et al., Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986–1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 694–702.Google Scholar

Oron, T, Sheiner, E, Shoham-Vardi, I, et al. Risk factors for antepartum fetal death. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 825–30.Google Scholar

Nohr, EA, Bech, BH, Davies, MJ, et al. Prepregnancy obesity and fetal death: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 250–9.Google Scholar

Raymond, EG, Cnattingius, S, Kiely, JL. Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 301–6.Google Scholar

Wisborg, K, Ingerslev, HJ, Henriksen, TB. IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1312–16.Google Scholar

Surkan, PJ, Stephansson, O, Dickman, PW, Cnattingius, S. Previous preterm and small-for-gestational-age births and the subsequent risk of stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 777–85.Google Scholar

Gardosi, J, Kady, SM, McGeown, P, Francis, A, Tonks, A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331: 1113–17.Google Scholar

Varner, MW, Silver, RM, Rowland Hogue, CJ, et al. Association between stillbirth and illicit drug use and smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 113–25.Google Scholar

Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011; 306: 2469–79.Google Scholar

Gordon, A, Raynes-Greenow, C, McGeechan, K, Morris, J, Jeffery, H. Stillbirth risk in a second pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2012; 119: 509–17.Google Scholar

Sharma, PP, Salihu, HM, Kirby, RS. Stillbirth recurrence in a population of relatively low-risk mothers. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 (Suppl 1): 24–30.Google Scholar

Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377: 1331–40.Google Scholar

Petersson, K, Bremme, K, Bottinga, R, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of intrauterine fetal deaths in Stockholm 1998–99. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 284–92.Google Scholar

Allen, VM, Joseph, K, Murphy, KE, Magee, LA, Ohlsson, A. The effect of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy on small for gestational age and stillbirth: a population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004; 4: 17.Google Scholar

Davis, LE, Lucas, MJ, Hankins, GD, Roark, ML, Cunningham, FG. Thyrotoxicosis complicating pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 63–70.Google Scholar

Benhadi, N, Wiersinga, WM, Reitsma, JB, Vrijkotte, TG, Bonsel, GJ. Higher maternal TSH levels in pregnancy are associated with increased risk for miscarriage, fetal or neonatal death. Eur J Endocrinol 2009; 160: 985–91.Google Scholar

Vidaeff, AC, Yeomans, ER, Ramin, SM. Pregnancy in women with renal disease. Part I: general principles. Am J Perinatol 2008; 25: 385–97.Google Scholar

Oshiro, BT, Silver, RM, Scott, JR, Yu, H, Branch, DW. Antiphospholipid antibodies and fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 489–93.Google Scholar

Rey, E, Kahn, SR, David, M, Shrier, I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2003; 361: 901–8.Google Scholar

Silver, RM, Zhao, Y, Spong, CY, et al. Prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 14–20.Google Scholar

Dizon-Townson, D, Miller, C, Sibai, B, et al. The relationship of the factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy outcomes for mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 517–24.Google Scholar

Said, JM, Higgins, JR, Moses, EK, et al. Inherited thrombophilia polymorphisms and pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 5–13.Google Scholar

Korteweg, FJ, Bouman, K, Erwich, JJ, et al. Cytogenetic analysis after evaluation of 750 fetal deaths: proposal for diagnostic workup. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 865–74.Google Scholar

Breed, AS, Mantingh, A, Vosters, R, et al. Follow-up and pregnancy outcome after a diagnosis of mosaicism in CVS. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11: 577–80.Google Scholar

Wapner, RJ, Lewis, D. Genetics and metabolic causes of stillbirth. Semin Perinatol, 2002. 26: 70–4.Google Scholar

Pauli, RM, Reiser, CA. Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Program: II. Analysis of diagnoses and diagnostic categories in the first 1,000 referrals. Am J Med Genet 1994; 50: 135–53.Google Scholar

Laube, DW, Schauberger, CW. Fetomaternal bleeding as a cause for “unexplained” fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 649–51.Google Scholar

Sebring, ES, Polesky, HF. Fetomaternal hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, time of occurrence, and clinical effects. Transfusion 1990; 30: 344–57.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, Lapinski, RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.Google Scholar

Korteweg, FJ, Gordijn, SJ, Timmer, A, et al. The Tulip classification of perinatal mortality: introduction and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement. BJOG 2006; 113: 393–401.Google Scholar

Collins, JH. Umbilical cord accidents: human studies. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26: 79–82.Google Scholar

Lewi, L, Jani, J, Blickstein, I, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 514.e1–8.Google Scholar

Moore, TR, Gale, S, Benirschke, K. Perinatal outcome of forty-nine pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 907–12.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, McClure, EM, Bann, CM. The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 1303–9.Google Scholar

Page, JM, Christiansen-Lindquist, L, Thorsten, V, et al. Diagnostic tests for evaluation of stillbirth: results from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 699–706. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001937.Google Scholar

Woodward, PJ, Sohaey, R, Harris, DP, et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 41–6.Google Scholar

Goldstein, DP, Reid, DE. Circulating fibrinolytic activity: a precursor of hypofibrinogenemia following fetal death in utero. Obstet Gynecol 1963; 22: 174–80.Google Scholar

Maslow, AD, Breen, TW, Sarna, MC, et al. Prevalence of coagulation abnormalities associated with intrauterine fetal death. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 1237–43.Google Scholar

Autry, AM, Hayes, EC, Jacobson, GF, Kirby, RS. A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 393–7.Google Scholar

Cowett, AA, Golub, RM, Grobman, WA. Cost-effectiveness of dilation and evacuation versus the induction of labor for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 768–73.Google Scholar

Bryant, AG, Grimes, DA, Garrett, JM, Stuart, GS. Second-trimester abortion for fetal anomalies or fetal death: labor induction compared with dilation and evacuation. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 788–92. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c3d26.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 386–97.Google Scholar

Toaff, R, Ayalon, D, Gogol, G. Clinical use of high concentration oxytocin drip. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 37: 112–20.Google Scholar

Nakintu, N. A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in women with intra uterine fetal death in Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2001; 1: 55–9.Google Scholar

Ashok, PW, Templeton, A, Wagaarachchi, PT, Flett, GM. Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases. Contraception 2004; 69: 51–8.Google Scholar

Goh, SE, Thong, KJ. Induction of second trimester abortion (12–20 weeks) with mifepristone and misoprostol: a review of 386 consecutive cases. Contraception 2006; 73: 516–19.Google Scholar

Rose, SB, Shand, C, Simmons, A. Mifepristone- and misoprostol-induced mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: a review of 272 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 479–85.Google Scholar

Ngoc, NT, Shochet, T, Raghavan, S, et al. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 601–8.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 7. London: RCOG, 2011. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/the-care-of-women-requesting-induced-abortion (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Airoldi, J, O’Neill, AM, Einhorn, K, Hoffman, M. Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review. BJOG 2009; 116: 1151–7.Google Scholar

Silver, RM, Varner, MW, Reddy, U, et al. Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 433–44.Google Scholar

Ahlenius, I, Floberg, J, Thomassen, P. Sixty-six cases of intrauterine fetal death. A prospective study with an extensive test protocol. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 109–17.Google Scholar

Incerpi, MH, Miller, DA, Samadi, R, Settlage, RH, Goodwin, TM. Stillbirth evaluation: what tests are needed? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1121–5.Google Scholar

Thayyil, S, Cleary, JO, Sebire, NJ, et al. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet 2009; 374: 467–75.Google Scholar

Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1374–7.Google Scholar

Reddy, UM, Page, GP, Saade, GR, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2185–93.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Shah, I, Crossley, JA, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and alpha-fetoprotein and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 161–6.Google Scholar

Smith, GC, Yu, CK, Papageorghiou, AT, et al. Maternal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 144–51.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1122–33.Google Scholar

Rai, R, Backos, M, Baxter, N, Chilcott, I, Regan, L. Recurrent miscarriage: an aspirin a day? Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2220–3.Google Scholar

Frias, AE, Luikenaar, RA, Sullivan, AE, et al. Poor obstetric outcome in subsequent pregnancies in women with prior fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 521–6.Google Scholar

Kaandorp, SP, Goddijn, M, van der Post, JA, et al. Aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1586–96.Google Scholar

Schisterman, EF, Silver, RM, Lesher, LL, et al. Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 29–36.Google Scholar

Weeks, JW, Asrat, T, Morgan, MA, et al, Antepartum surveillance for a history of stillbirth: when to begin? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 486–92.Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Summary

Access options

References

References

Further Reading

References

References

Further Reading

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

References

References

Book contents

Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Summary

Access options

References

References

Further Reading

References

References

Further Reading

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive