Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgment
- Part One Religion as a Field of Sociological Knowledge
- Part Two Religion and Social Change
- 6 Demographic Methods for the Sociology of Religion
- 7 Church Attendance in the United States
- 8 The Dynamics of Religious Economies
- 9 Historicizing the Secularization Debate
- 10 Escaping the Procustean Bed
- 11 Religion and Spirituality
- Part Three Religion and the Life Course
- Part Four Religion and Social Identity
- Part Five Religion, Political Behavior, and Public Culture
- Part Six Religion and Socioeconomic Inequality
- References
- Index
10 - Escaping the Procustean Bed
A Critical Analysis of the Study of Religious Organizations, 1930–2001
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgment
- Part One Religion as a Field of Sociological Knowledge
- Part Two Religion and Social Change
- 6 Demographic Methods for the Sociology of Religion
- 7 Church Attendance in the United States
- 8 The Dynamics of Religious Economies
- 9 Historicizing the Secularization Debate
- 10 Escaping the Procustean Bed
- 11 Religion and Spirituality
- Part Three Religion and the Life Course
- Part Four Religion and Social Identity
- Part Five Religion, Political Behavior, and Public Culture
- Part Six Religion and Socioeconomic Inequality
- References
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In reviewing the literature that has emerged around the study of American religious institutions over the past seventy years one is reminded of the story of Procrustes, the infamous robber of Attica who is said to have made his victims fit his bed by stretching them if they were too short, or cutting their legs if they were too long. Similarly, religious scholars have sought to fit institutional manifestations of American religion into theoretical beds that were poorly fitted to their inherent qualities and characteristics.
This chapter offers a critical review of the literature examining religious organizations in America. Beginning with Max Weber's (1925/1978) studies of church bureaucracy and ending with more recent excursions into neoinstitutional theory, it highlights some of the ways that our adoption of various theoretical lenses has obscured the view of the forest by continually pointing toward particularly interesting trees. In an attempt to get the forest in view again, it then points to the kinds of variation that often have been neglected, and suggests a refocusing on the social processes that give the religious landscape its contour.
In this sense, the chapter is a call for new approaches to the study of religious institutions. I seek to encourage perspectives that examine religion from a supraorganizational level of analysis, focusing on the cultural processes that shape American society and its religious institutions, and the boundary setting processes that define identity and meaning.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Handbook of the Sociology of Religion , pp. 123 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 11
- Cited by