Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgment
- Part One Religion as a Field of Sociological Knowledge
- Part Two Religion and Social Change
- 6 Demographic Methods for the Sociology of Religion
- 7 Church Attendance in the United States
- 8 The Dynamics of Religious Economies
- 9 Historicizing the Secularization Debate
- 10 Escaping the Procustean Bed
- 11 Religion and Spirituality
- Part Three Religion and the Life Course
- Part Four Religion and Social Identity
- Part Five Religion, Political Behavior, and Public Culture
- Part Six Religion and Socioeconomic Inequality
- References
- Index
8 - The Dynamics of Religious Economies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgment
- Part One Religion as a Field of Sociological Knowledge
- Part Two Religion and Social Change
- 6 Demographic Methods for the Sociology of Religion
- 7 Church Attendance in the United States
- 8 The Dynamics of Religious Economies
- 9 Historicizing the Secularization Debate
- 10 Escaping the Procustean Bed
- 11 Religion and Spirituality
- Part Three Religion and the Life Course
- Part Four Religion and Social Identity
- Part Five Religion, Political Behavior, and Public Culture
- Part Six Religion and Socioeconomic Inequality
- References
- Index
Summary
An immense intellectual shift is taking place in the social scientific study of religion. During the past few years many of its most venerated theoretical positions – faithfully passed down from the famous founders of the field – have been overturned. The changes have become so dramatic and far-reaching that R. Stephen Warner identified them “as a paradigm shift in progress” (1993:1044), an assessment that since then “has been spectacularly fulfilled,” according to Andrew Greeley (1996: 1).
This chapter reviews a small portion of this major paradigm shift: the dynamics of religious economies. Elsewhere (Stark and Finke 2000) we offer a more complete theoretical model, developing propositions explaining individual religious behavior, the dynamics of religious groups, and a more comprehensive examination of religious economies. Here our goals are far more modest. First, we will briefly contrast the new paradigm with the inherited model. Next, we offer a few of the foundational propositions for understanding religious economies. Finally, we use recent research to illustrate the dynamics of religious economies.
A PARADIGM SHIFT
The Old Paradigm
Since the founding of the social sciences, the study of religion has been dominated by a paradigm where religion is explained as an epiphenomenon, serving as a salve for social ills, and relying on the unchallenged religious authority of a monopoly to make religious beliefs plausible. As an epiphenomenon, Durkheim (1912/1976) and others viewed religion as an elaborate reflection of more basic realities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Handbook of the Sociology of Religion , pp. 96 - 109Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 25
- Cited by