Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Article 7 Number of arbitrators
- Article 8 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 9 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 10 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 11 Disclosures by and challenge of arbitrators
- Article 12 Disclosures by and challenge of arbitrators
- Article 13 Procedure for the challenge of arbitrators
- Article 14 Replacement of an arbitrator
- Article 15 Repetition of hearings in the event of the replacement of an arbitrator
- Article 16 Exclusion of liability
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Section IV The award
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Article 11 - Disclosures by and challenge of arbitrators
from Section II - Composition of the arbitral tribunal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Article 7 Number of arbitrators
- Article 8 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 9 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 10 Appointment of arbitrators
- Article 11 Disclosures by and challenge of arbitrators
- Article 12 Disclosures by and challenge of arbitrators
- Article 13 Procedure for the challenge of arbitrators
- Article 14 Replacement of an arbitrator
- Article 15 Repetition of hearings in the event of the replacement of an arbitrator
- Article 16 Exclusion of liability
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Section IV The award
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Guide to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules , pp. 128 - 138Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: The Application by the Iran–US Claims Tribunal (The Hague: TNC Asser Instituut, 1991), 58Google Scholar
and , ‘Establishment of an Arbitral Tribunal under the UNCITRAL Rules: The Experience of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’, Int’l Law, 23 (1989), 81, 116
, and , The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2006), 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Secretary-General on the Preliminary Draft Set of Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL, 8th Session, UN Doc A/CN.9/97 (1974), reprinted in UNCITRAL Yearbook, Volume VI: 1975, 163, 171.
and (eds.), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 1021;
, and , International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011),Google Scholar
and , with and , Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration: Commentary (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)
, ‘Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Practice’, American Review of International Arbitration 6 (1995), 339, 343.Google Scholar
, ‘The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators’, Journal of International Arbitration, 9 (1992), 31;Google Scholar
, ‘Impartiality of the Party-Appointed Arbitrator’, Arbitration International, 6 (1990), 323;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003), para. 11–19;Google Scholar
in The Work of UNCITRAL on Arbitration and Conciliation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 5,Google Scholar
and , ‘A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration’, in , , , and (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005), 199.Google Scholar
, and , International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration, 3rd ed. (Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 2000), 215.Google Scholar
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. & Vivendi Universal S.A. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/19, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal (12 May 2008), para. 44.
Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v Continental Casualty Co. (1968) 393 US 145
AT&T Corporation and Lucent Technologies Inc v Saudi Cable Company [2000] EWCA Civ 154
Svea Court of Appeal has taken a similar approach to the English court in a judgment of 7 December 2006, The Rappler Invest v TNK Trade Case, Svea Court of Appeal, Sweden, Case No T5004–04
and , Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2007), 362.Google Scholar
, ‘Probity Deconstructed: How Helpful, Really, Are the New International Bar Association Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration?’, Arbitration International, 21(3) (2005), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar