Book contents
- Greek Memories
- Greek Memories
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Archaic and Early Classical Configurations of Memory
- Part II Memory and Forgetting in the Classical Period
- Part III Hellenistic Configurations of Memory
- Part IV The Imperial Period: Continuity and Change
- Part V Envoi
- References
- Index Locorum
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 February 2019
Book contents
- Greek Memories
- Greek Memories
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Archaic and Early Classical Configurations of Memory
- Part II Memory and Forgetting in the Classical Period
- Part III Hellenistic Configurations of Memory
- Part IV The Imperial Period: Continuity and Change
- Part V Envoi
- References
- Index Locorum
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Greek MemoriesTheories and Practices, pp. 363 - 406Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abram, D. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. New York.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. D. (1965). ‘Aristotle’s Distinction Between Energeia and Kinesis’, in Bambrough, R. (ed.) New Essays on Plato and Aristotle. London: 121–41.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010). Arion’s Lyre. Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry. Princeton and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012). Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2011). The Cratylus of Plato: A Commentary. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agócs, P. (2009). ‘Memory and Forgetting in Pindar’s Seventh Isthmian’, in Doležalová, L. (ed.) Strategies of Remembrance: From Pindar to Hölderlin. Newcastle upon Tyne: 33–92.Google Scholar
Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012). Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ahearne-Kroll, S. P. (2014). ‘Mnemosyne at the Asklepieia’, Classical Philology 109: 99–118.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. (1996). ‘Landscapes of Memory and the Authority of Pausanias’, in Bingen, J. (ed.) Pausanias Historien. Geneva: 241–67.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. (2002). Archaeologies of the Greek Past. Landscape, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J., and Elsner, J. (eds.) (2001). Pausanias. Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Alexiou, M. (2002 – first published in 1974). The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. 2nd edn. Lanham.Google Scholar
Allen, R. E. (1996). The Dialogues of Plato, III: Ion, Hippias Minor, Laches, Protagoras, with transl. and comm. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Andriopoulos, D. Z. (2015). ‘Can We Identify an Empiricist Theory of Memory in Plato’s Dialogues?’, Philosophical Inquiry 39: 124–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeli, A. (1985). ‘L’esattezza scientifica in Epicuro e Filodemo’, Cronache Ercolanesi 15: 63–84.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1986). ‘Compendi, eklogai, tetrapharmakos: due capitoli di dissenso nell’epicureismo’, Cronache Ercolanesi 16: 53–66.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1992). ‘Aristotle on Memory and the Self’, in Nussbaum, M. and Oksenberg Rorty, A. (eds.) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: 297–311.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (2006). Poesia, poetiche e storia nella riflessione dei Greci. Studi. Pisa.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (2010). ‘Epicuro, la κυρία λέξις e i πράγματα’, Cronache Ercolanesi 40: 17–22.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (2013). ‘Forme della comunicazione in Epicuro’, in Erler, M. and Heßler, J. H. (eds.) Argument und literarische Form in antiker Philosophie. Berlin and Boston: 315–37.Google Scholar
Arrington, N. T. (2015). Ashes, Images, and Memories: The Presence of the War Dead in Fifth-Century Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Arthur Katz, M. (1981). ‘The Divided World of Iliad VI’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.) Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 19–44.Google Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A. B., and Corcella, A. (2007). A Commentary on Herodotus I-IV. Oxford.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2009). ‘Epicurean Empiricism’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (2016). ‘Lucretius’ Reception of Epicurus: De Rerum natura as a Conversion Narrative’, Hermes 144: 439–61.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2007). Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich. (Engl. transl.: Assmann 2011.)Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2000). Religion und Kulturelles Gedächtnis. Zehn Studien. Munich. (Engl. transl.: Assman, J. (2006). Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. Stanford.)Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2008). ‘Communicative and Cultural Memory’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.) Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and New York: 109–18.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. (2012). ‘Performance and Reperformance: The Siphnian Treasury Evoked (Pindar’s Pythian 6, Olympian 2 and Isthmian 2)’, in Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge: 134–57.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (2009). ‘Epicurean Philosophy of Language’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 197–215.Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Olson, S. D. (2003–2004). ‘On the Date and Plot of Aristophanes’ Lost Thesmophoriazusae II’, Leeds International Classical Studies 3: 1–11.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1967). ‘Idyll 16: Theocritus and Simonides’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 98: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulay, V. (2004). Xénophon et les Grâces du pouvoir. De la charis au charisma. Paris.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (2000). ‘The Road to Prominence’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) Demosthenes: Statesman and Orator. London: 9–44.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. (2000). ‘Jesus Reads a Book’, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 51: 577–88.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (1997). Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in its Linguistic Contexts. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2002b). ‘Khronos, Kleos, and Ideology from Herodotus to Homer’, in Reichel, M. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Epea Pteroenta: Beitrage zur Homerforschung. Stuttgart: 11–30.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2005). Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2008). ‘Epic Remembering’, Mackay, E. A. (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden: 65–77.Google Scholar
Bakker, F. A. (2016). Epicurean Meterology: Sources, Method, Scope and Organization. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baracchi, C. (2001). ‘Beyond the Comedy and Tragedy of Authority: The Invisible Father in Plato’s Republic’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 34: 151–76.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. (2008). Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2005). ‘Goddess of Love and Mistress of the Sea. Notes on an Hellenistic Hymn to Arsinoe-Aphrodite (P. Lit. Goodsp. 2, I-IV)’, Ancient Society 35: 135–65.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. (2009). Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baroin, C. (2007). ‘Techniques, arts et pratiques de la mémoire en Grèce et à Rome’, Métis N. S. 5: 135–60.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2002). Staged Narrative: Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bassi, K. (2005). ‘Things of the Past: Objects and Time in Greek Narrative’, Arethusa 38: 1–32.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (eds.) (2010). Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baxter, E. (2007). ‘The “New Sappho” and the Phaedo: Reflections on Immortality’, Dionysius 25: 7–19.Google Scholar
Becker, A. and Scholz, P. (2004). Dissoi Logoi. Zweierlei Ansichten: Ein sophistischer Traktat. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecroft, A. J. (2006). ‘“This Is Not a True Story”: Stesichorus’s “Palinode” and the Revenge of the Epichoric’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 136: 47–69.Google Scholar
Beer, B. (2009). Lukrez und Philodem: poetische Argumentation und poetologischer Diskurs. Basel.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2003). ‘La méthode épicurienne des explications multiples’, in Bénatouil, T., Laurand, V. and Macé, A. (eds.) L’Épicurisme antique. Paris: 15–47.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1954). ‘Formes et sens de μνάομαι’, in Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung. Bern: 13–18.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1987–2007). Poetae Epici Graeci. 4 vols. Leipzig, Stuttgart, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2011). Platón y el orfismo: diálogos entre religión y filosofía. Referencias de religión. Madrid.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2013). ‘Ὁ Πλάτων παρωιδεῖ τὰ Ὀρφέως: Plato’s Transposition of Orphic Netherworld Imagery’, in Adluri, V. (ed.) Philosophy and Salvation in Greek Religion. Berlin: 117–150.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I. (2008). Instructions for the Netherworld. The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I. (2011). ‘Are the “Orphic” Gold Leaves Orphic?’, in Edmonds, R. G. III (ed.) The “Orphic” Gold Tablets and Greek Religion: Further Along the Path. Cambridge: 68–101.Google Scholar
Berzins Mc Coy, M. (2009). ‘Alcidamas, Isocrates, and Plato on Speech, Writing, and Philosophical Rhetoric’, Ancient Philosophy 29: 45–66.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. and Brillante, C. (2002). Il mito di Elena. Immagini e racconti dalla Grecia a oggi. Turin.Google Scholar
Beversluis, J. (2000). Cross Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. (2003). ‘“Ich aber (sage), das Schönste ist, was einer liebt!”: eine pragmatische Deutung von Sappho Fr. 16 LP/V’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 74: 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biles, Z. (2002). ‘Intertextual Biography in the Rivalry of Cratinus and Aristophanes’, American Journal of Philology 123: 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. (2009). The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, W. (1966). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, in Keynes, G. (ed.) Blake. Complete Writings. Oxford: 12–13.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1971). Plotinus’ Psychology: His Doctrines of the Embodied Soul. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1989). Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (1995). ‘Simonides on Platea: Narrative Elegy, Mythodic History’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 107: 217–29.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (1998). ‘Presenting the Past in Fifth-Century Athens’, in Boedeker, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.) Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge (Mass.): 185–202.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (2001). ‘Heroic Historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Platea’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) The New Simonides, Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York: 120–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001). The New Simonides, Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bolmarcich, S. (2007). ‘The Afterlife of a Treaty’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 57: 477–89.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. (1970). ‘Funes the Memorious’, in Yates, D. A. and Irby, J. E. (eds.) Jorge Luis Borges. Labyrinths. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Bouchet, C. (2008). ‘Les lois dans le Contre Timarque d’Eschine’, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 50: 267–88.Google Scholar
Bouvier, D. (2011). ‘Chanter les morts dans l’Iliade: entre mémoire feminine et mémoire masculine’, Gaia 14: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvrie Thorsen, S. des (1978). ‘The Interpretations of Sappho’s Fragment 16 L.P.’, Symbolae Osloenses 53: 5–23.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. M. (1997). ‘Tragic Filters for History: Euripides’ Supplices and Sophocles’ Philoctetes’, in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford: 39–62.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1986). ‘Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. (2001). ‘Ancestors of Historiography in Early Greek Elegiac and Iambic Poetry?’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 44–66.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G., El Murr, D., and Gill, C. (eds.) (2013). The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bredlow Wenda, L. A. (2008). ‘Epicurus’s Letter to Herodotus: Some Textual Notes’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 171–7.Google Scholar
Brillante, C. (2015). ‘La memoria e il tempo nella testimonianza di Simonide’, Gaia 18: 211–23.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2006). ‘La place de la mémoire dans la psychologie plotinienne’, Etudes platoniciennes 3: 13–27.Google Scholar
Brown, C. (1989). ‘Anactoria and the Χαρίτων ἀμαρύγματα. Sappho fr. 16,18 Voigt’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 61: 7–15.Google Scholar
Buckler, J. (2000). ‘Demosthenes and Aeschines’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) Demosthenes: Statesman and Orator. London: 114–58.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2017). ‘Performance, Reperformance, Preperformance: The Paradox of Repeating the Unique in Pindaric Epinician and Beyond’, in Uhlig, A. and Hunter, R. (eds.) Imagining Reperformance in Classical Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. Cambridge: 42–62.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. L. (1986). Studia Pindarica. Berkeley and Los Angeles. [Reprint of (1962) California Publications in Classical Philology 18.]Google Scholar
Burgess, D. L. (1990). ‘Pindar’s Olympian 10: Praise for the Poet, Praise for the Victor’, Hermes 118: 273–81.Google Scholar
Burian, P. (1997). ‘Myth into Muthos: The Shaping of the Tragic Plot’, in Easterling, P. E. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: 178–208.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. (1979). ‘Desire and Memory (Sappho frag. 94)’, Classical Philology 74: 16–27.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976). ‘Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 26: 29–51.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1987). ‘Wittgenstein and Augustine De magistro’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, s.v. 61: 1–24.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1998). ‘Dissoi logoi’, in Craig, E. (ed.) Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. J. (2001). ‘The Lost Thesmophoriazusae of Aristophanes’, Phoenix 55: 44–76.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. J. (2004). ‘The Date of Aristophanes’ Lost Thesmophoriazusae: A Response to Austin and Olson’, Leeds International Classical Studies 3: 1–5.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. (ed.) (1999). From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, D. (2013). ‘The Imagery of Eros in Plato’s Phaedrus’, in Sanders, E., Thumiger, C., Carey, C. and Lowe, N. (eds.) Eros in Ancient Greece. Oxford: 233–50.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1983). Alcman. Introduction, texte critique, témoignages, traduction et commentaire. Rome.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1988). ‘Spartan Genealogies: The Mythological Representation of a Spatial Organisation’, in Bremmer, J. (ed.) Interpretations of Greek Mythology. London: 153–86.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1990). ‘Mythe, récit épique et histoire. Le récit hérodotéen de la fondation de Cyrène’, in Calame, C. (ed.) Métamorphoses du mythe en Grèce antique. Geneva: 105–25.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1992). ‘Espaces liminaux et voix discursives dans l’Idylle I de Théocrite: une civilisation de poètes’, Etudes de Lettres 2: 59–85.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1995). The Craft of Poetic Speech in Ancient Greece. Ithaca (NY). [Transl. of: (1986) Le récit en Grèce ancienne, Paris.]Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1996). ‘Sappho’s Group: An Initiation into Womanhood’, in Greene, E. (ed.) Reading Sappho. Contemporary Approaches. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 113–24.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1998). ‘La poésie lyrique grecque, un genre inexistant?’, Littérature 111: 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. (2001). Choruses of Young Women in Ancient Greece: Their Morphology, Religious Role, and Social Functions. 2nd edn. Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2004). ‘Choral Forms in Aristophanic Comedy: Musical Mimesis and Dramatic Performance in Classical Athens’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds.) Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 157–84.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2005). Masques d’autorité. Fiction et pragmatique dans la poétique grecque antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2006a). ‘Récit héroïque et pratique religieuse: le passé poétique des cités grecques classiques’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 61: 527–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. (2006b). Pratiques poétiques de la mémoire. Représentations de l’espace-temps en Grèce ancienne. Paris 2006. [Engl. transl: (2009) Poetic and performative memory in ancient Greece. Cambridge (Mass.).]Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2008). Sentiers transversaux. Entre poétiques grecques et politiques contemporaines, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2009a). ‘Age, Peers Groups, Rites of Passage’, in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies. Oxford: 281–93.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2009b). ‘L’enlèvement de la belle Hélène et la tradition politique de la poétique grecque: réinterprétations et controverses’, in Aygon, J.-P., Bonnet, C. and Noacco, C. (eds.) La Mythologie de l’Antiquité à la Modernité. Appropriation – Adaptation – Détournement. Rennes: 19–33.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2010). ‘La pragmatique poétique des mythes grecs: fiction référentielle et performance rituelle’, in Lavocat, F. and Duprat, A. (eds.) Fiction et cultures. Paris: 33–56.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2016). ‘The Amorous Gaze: A Poetic and Pragmatic Koinê for Erotic Melos?’, in Cazzato, V. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual. Leiden and Boston: 288–306.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. (1984). ‘An Echo of Sappho Fragment 16 L.P. at Aeschylus, Agamemnon 403–419?’, Estudios Clásicos 87: 215–18.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (2007a). ‘Come confutare un libro? Dal Fedro al Teeteto di Platone’, Antiquorum Philosophia 1: 99–122.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (2007b). ‘Problemi della memoria in Platone’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.) Tracce nella mente. Teorie della memoria da Platone ai moderni. Pisa: 1–23.Google Scholar
Campanile, D. (2006). ‘Eliano e la sua varia historia’, in Amato, E. (ed.) Approches de la Troisième Sophistique. Homages à Jacques Schamp. Brussels: 420–30.Google Scholar
Campos Daroca, F. J. and López Martínez, M. P. (2010). ‘Communauté épicurienne et communication épistolaire. Lettres de femmes selon le PHerc. 176: la correspondance de Batis’, in Antoni, A., Arrighetti, G., Bertagna, M. I. and Delattre, D. (eds.) Miscellanea Papyrologica Herculanensia. Pisa and Rome: 21–36.Google Scholar
Caneva, S. G. (2014). ‘Courtly Love, Stars and Power. The Queen in 3rd Century Royal Couples, Through Poetry and Epigraphic Texts’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Hellenistic Poetry in Context. Leuven: 25–58.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (2014). ‘The Homeric Ladies of Shalott’, Classical Receptions Journal 6: 198–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (forthcoming). ‘Commemoration Through Objects? Homer on the Limitations of Material Memory’, in Giangiulio, M., Franchi, E. and Proietti, G. (eds.) Commemorating War and War Dead. Ancient and Modern. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Canevaro, M. (2013). The Documents in the Attic Orators. Laws and Decrees in the Public Speeches of the Demosthenic Corpus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capasso, M. (1984). ‘Prassifane, Epicuro e Filodemo. A proposito di Diog. Laert. X 13 e Philod. Poem. V IX 10-X 1’, Elenchos 5: 391–415.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1988). ‘Gli Epicurei e il potere della memoria (PHerc. 1041 e 1040)’, in Mandilaras, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Papyrology. Athens, I: 257–70.Google Scholar
Capra, A. (2001). Ἀγὼν λóγων: Il ‘Protagora’ di Platone tra eristica e commedia. Milan.Google Scholar
Capra, A. (2014a). Plato’s Four Muses: The Phaedrus and the Poetics of Philosophy. Cambridge (Mass.) and Washington.Google Scholar
Capra, A. (2014b). ‘Lyric Poetry and Its Platonic Pedigree’, in Werner, C. and Sebastian, B. B. (eds.) Gêneros poéticos na Grécia antiga: confluências e fronteiras. São Paulo: 125–48.Google Scholar
Carawan, E. (2008). ‘What the MNEMONES know’, in Mackay, E. A. (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden: 163–84.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2005). ‘Propaganda and Competition in Athenian Oratory’, in Enenkel, K. and Pfeijffer, I. L. (eds.) The Manipulative Mode. Political Propaganda in Antiquity: A Collection of Case Studies. Leiden: 65–100.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. D. (2010). ‘What is Peculiar in Aristotle’s and Plato’s Psychologies? What is Common to Them Both?’, in Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.) Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. London: 21–44.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. (1990). The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge. [2nd edn published in 2008.]Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. (1996). ‘Review of Lina Bolzoni’s La Stanza della Memoria: modelli letterari e iconografici nell’età della stampa’, Speculum 71: 689–92.Google Scholar
Carruthers, M. (1998). The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1992). ‘Simonides Painter’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.) Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London: 51–64.Google Scholar
Carter, R. E. (1967). ‘Plato and Inspiration’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 5: 111–21.Google Scholar
Cashdollar, S. (1973). ‘Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception’, Phronesis 18: 156–75.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2006a). ‘Liberal Arts and Recollection in Augustine’s Confessions’, Philosophie Antique 6: 107–35.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2006b). ‘Memoria aristotelica, memoria agostiniana’, in La Palombara, U. and Lucchetta, G. (eds.) Mente, anima e corpo nel mondo antico: immagini e funzioni. Pescara: 141–60.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2005). ‘The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception’, in Salles, R. (ed.) Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: 245–320.Google Scholar
Catenacci, C. (1999). ‘Ἀπονέμειν/«leggere»: Pind. Isthm. 2, 47; Soph. fr. 144; Aristoph. Av. 1289’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica n.s. 62: 49–61.Google Scholar
Catenacci, C. (2013). ‘Saffo, un’immagine vascolare e la poesia del distacco’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 133: 69–74.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (2010). ‘Changing Contexts: Tragedy in the Civic and Cultural Life of Hellenistic City-States’, in Gildenhard, I. and Revermann, M. (eds.) Beyond the Fifth Century: Interactions with Greek Tragedy from the Fourth Century bce to the Middle Ages. Berlin: 99–150.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (2013). Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600–150 bc). Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerri, G. (2012). ‘Le Nuvole di Aristofane e la realtà storica di Socrate’, in Perusino, F. and Colantonio, M. (eds.) La commedia greca e la storia. Pisa: 151–94.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. (2009). ‘Travelling Memories in the Hellenistic world’, in Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.) Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality, and Panhellenism. Cambridge: 249–69.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1950). ‘Les verbes grecs signifiant “lire”’, in Mélanges H. Grégoire II. Brussels: 115–26.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P (1968–1980). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2002). Sostanza movimento analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele. Naples.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009). ‘Plotin, la mémoire et la connaissance des intelligibles’, Philosophie antique 9: 5–33.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2012). ‘Plotinus’ Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense-Perception and Discursive Thought’, Topoi 31: 191–207.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2015). ‘Dualismo metafisico e teoria dell’azione in Plotino’, in Canone, E. (ed.) La riflessione morale di fronte al problema anima-corpo: Antichi e Moderni. Florence: 117–31.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (2005). ‘A Catalogue Within a Catalogue: Helen’s Suitors in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women (frr. 196–204)’, in Hunter, R. (ed.) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Constructions and reconstructions. Cambridge: 118–52.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2008). ‘Going Naked into the Shrine: Herbert, Plotinus and the Constructive Metaphor’, in Hedley, D. and Hutton, S. (eds.) Platonism at the Origins of Modernity. Dordrecht: 45–61.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2010). ‘How to Become Unconscious’, in Basile, P., Kiverstein, J. and Phemister, P. (eds.) The Metaphysics of Consciousness. Cambridge: 21–44.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1999). Flesh and Spirit in the Songs of Homer: A Study of Words and Myths. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1973). ‘Epicurus’ Last Will and Testament’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 55: 252–80.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2011). Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clayton, B. (2004). A Penelopean Poetics: Reweaving the Feminine in Homer’s Odyssey. Lanham.Google Scholar
Clements, A. (2014). Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae: Philosophizing Theatre and the Politics of Perception in Late Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cohoe, C. (2016). ‘When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities’, Phronesis 61: 337–72.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. (2004). Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: the Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1983). ‘Archaic Truth’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 13: 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. (1992). Ancient and Medieval Memories: Studies in the Reconstruction of the Past. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collard, C. (2007). ‘The Date of Euripides’ Suppliants and the Date of Tim Rice’s Chess’, in Collard, C., Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans. Liverpool: 138–40. [Revised version of an article first printed in Liverpool Classical Monthly 15 (1990): 48.]Google Scholar
Collard, C. and Cropp, M. J. (2008). Euripides. Fragments. 2 vols. (vol. vii: Aegeus-Meleager; vol. viii: Oedipus-Chrysippus, Other Fragments). Cambridge (Mass.) and London.Google Scholar
Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Lee, K. H. (1995). Euripides. Selected Fragmentary Plays, vol. 1. Warminster.Google Scholar
Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Gilbert, J. (2004). Euripides. Selected Fragmentary Plays, vol. 2. Warminster.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. (1985). ‘The Razing of the House in Greek Society’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 115: 79–102.Google Scholar
Contiades-Tsitsoni, E. (1990). Hymenaios und Epithalamion. Das Hochzeitslied in der frühgriechischen Lyrik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1970). ‘Plato on Sense-Perception and Knowledge (Theaetetus 184–186)’, Phronesis 15: 123–46.Google Scholar
Cornea, A. (2011–2012). ‘La prénotion d’Épicure est-elle d’inspiration platonicienne?’, Chora 9–10: 203–16.Google Scholar
Couliano, I. P. (1991). Out of this World: Otherworldly Journeys from Gilgamesh to Albert Einstein. Boston and London.Google Scholar
Crielaard, J. P. (2003). ‘The Cultural Biography of Material Goods in Homer’s Epics’, Gaia 7: 49–62.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (2004). ‘Some Social and Economic Conditions Behind the Rise of the Acting Profession in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries bc’, in Hugoniot, C., Hurlet, F. and Milanezi, S. (eds.) Le Statut de l’acteur dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine. Tours: 53–76.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. and Miller, M. (1998). ‘Democracy, Empire, and Art: Toward a Politics of Time and Narrative’, in Boedeker, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.) Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: 87–125.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2004). ‘Past Future and Present Past: Temporal Deixis in Greek Archaic Lyric’, Arethusa 37: 267–94.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2007). ‘Plotino: memoria di eventi e anamnesi di intelligibili’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), Tracce nella mente. Teorie della memoria da Platone ai Moderni. Pisa: 67–98.Google Scholar
Dagnini, I. (1986). ‘Elementi saffici e motivi tradizionali in Teocrito, Idillio XVIII’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 53: 38–46.Google Scholar
Damiani, V. (2015). ‘Die kommunikativen Merkmale von Epikurs Kompendien und ihr Verhältnis zum Traktat Περὶ φύσεως’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 39: 197–236.Google Scholar
Damiani, V. (2016). ‘Le epitomi di Epicuro: un modello di strategie comunicative per il De rerum natura’, in Tulli, M. (ed.) Testo e forme del testo: Ricerche di filologia filosofica. Pisa and Rome: 257–79.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. (1987). Le discours du particulier. Essai sur l’enquête hérodotéenne. Paris.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. (ed.) (2000). Constructions du temps dans le monde grec ancien. Paris.Google Scholar
Darcus Sullivan, S. (1989). ‘A study of φρένες in Pindar and Bacchylides’, Glotta 67: 148–89.Google Scholar
Darcus Sullivan, S. (1990). ‘An Analysis of the Psychic term νόος in Pindar and Bacchylides’, Glotta 68: 179–202.Google Scholar
Darcus Sullivan, S. (1994). Psychological and Ethical Ideas: What Early Greeks Say. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. (2010). Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication. Representation and Reperformance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, D. (2012). ‘Utile al singolo, utile a molti: il proemio dell’Epistola a Pitocle’, Cronache Ercolanesi 42: 95–109.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, D. (2015). ‘Questioni di stile: osservazioni sul linguaggio e sulla comunicazione del sapere nelle lettere maggiori di Epicuro’, in De Sanctis, D., Spinelli, E., Tulli, M. and Verde, F. (eds.) Questioni epicuree. Sankt Augustin: 55–73.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, D. (2016). ‘La biografia del Κῆπος e il profilo esemplare del saggio epicureo’, in Bonazzi, M. and Schorn, S. (eds.) Bios Philosophos: Philosophy in Ancient Greek Biography. Turnhout: 71–99.Google Scholar
Del Mastro, G. (2014). Titoli e annotazioni bibliologiche nei papiri greci di Ercolano. Naples.Google Scholar
Delattre, C. (2009). ‘AITIOLOGIA: mythe et procédure étiologique’, Métis n.s. 7: 285–310.Google Scholar
Derderian, K. (2001). Leaving Words to Remember: Greek Mourning and the Advent of Literacy. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1967). Les Maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque. Paris. (Engl. transl.: Detienne, 1996.)Google Scholar
Dewald, C. (2002). ‘“I Didn’t Give My Own Genealogy”: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F. and van Wees, H. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden: 267–89.Google Scholar
Di Marco, M. (1980). ‘Una parodia di Saffo in Euripide (Cycl. 182–186)’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 34: 39–45Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Blumenthal, H. J. (2015). Plotinus: Ennead IV.3–4.29. Problems Concerning the Soul. Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, E. (2010). ‘Helen’s “Judgment of Paris” and Greek Marriage Ritual in Sappho 16’, Arethusa 43: 1–20.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2007). ‘Le corpus épicurien’, in Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.) Lire Épicure et les épicuriens. Paris: 29–48.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1974). Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1976). ‘The Freedom of the Intellectual in Greek Society’, Talanta 7: 24–54 (reprinted in Dover, (1988), 135–58).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1988). The Greeks and their Legacy: Prose Literature, History, Society, Transmission, Influence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Draaisma, D. (2000). Metaphors of Memory. A History of Ideas About the Mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dubischar, M. (2016). ‘Preserved Knowledge. Summaries and Compilations’, in Hose, M. and Schenker, D. (eds.) A Companion to Greek Literature. Malden (Mass.): 427–40.Google Scholar
Dubois, P. (1985). ‘Phallocentrism and Its Subversion in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Arethusa 18: 91–103.Google Scholar
Dubois, P. (2010). Out of Athens: The New Ancient Greeks. Cambridge (Mass.) and London.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (1985). ‘Anachronism in Greek Tragedy’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 1–10.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. (1991). ‘Men’s κλέος and Women’s γόος: Female Voices in the Iliad’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 9: 145–51.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. (2008). ‘Pindar’s κοινὸς λόγος and Panhellenism in Olympian 10’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 151: 37–48.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1988). ‘An Ars Oblivionalis? Forget It!’, Proceedings of the Modern Language Association 103: 254–61.Google Scholar
Eijk, P. J. van der (1997). ‘Towards a Rhetoric of Ancient Scientific Discourse: Some Formal Characteristics of Greek Medical and Philosophical Texts (Hippocratic Corpus, Aristotle)’, in Bakker, E. J. (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in its Linguistic Context. Leiden: 77–129.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. (1963). ‘Mythologies of Memory and Forgetting’, History of Religions 2: 329–44.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Squire, M. (2016). ‘Sight and Memory: The Visual Arts of Roman Mnemonics’, in Squire, M. (ed.) Sight and the Ancient Senses. London and New York: 180–204.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. (1988). Plotinus on Sense-Perception. A Philosophical Study. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erbì, M. (2013). ‘Il βίοϲ di Dionisio di Eraclea nella Stoicorum Historia di Filodemo (PHerc. 1018, coll. XXIX 5–XXXIII 4)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 43: 27–34.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1994). ‘Epikur-Die Schule Epikurs-Lukrez’, in Flashar, H. (ed.) Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, 4. Die hellenistische Philosophie. Basel: 29–490.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2002). ‘Epicurus as deus mortalis. Homoiosis theoi and Epicurean Self’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.) Traditions of Theology. Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden, Boston and Cologne: 159–81.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2003). ‘Philologia medicans. Comment les Épicuriens lisaient les textes de leur maître?’, in Bénatouil, T., Laurand, V. and Macé, A. (eds.) L’Épicurisme antique. Paris: 217–53.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2009). ‘La felicità del proficiens in Platone e negli Epicurei’, in Donatelli, P. and Spinelli, E. (eds.) Il senso della virtù. Rome: 49–60.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2014). ‘La sacralizzazione di Socrate e di Epicuro’, in Beretta, M., Citti, F. and Iannucci, A. (eds.) Il culto di Epicuro: Testi, iconografia e paesaggio. Florence: 1–13.Google Scholar
Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.) (2008). Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2011). Glückselig und unsterblich. Epikureische Theologie bei Cicero und Philodem. Mit einer Edition von PHerc. 152/157, Kol. 8–10. Basel.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1994). ‘Epicurus on mind and language’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Language. Cambridge: 74–108.Google Scholar
Faraguna, M. (1992). Atene nell’età di Alessandro. Problemi politici, economici e finanziari. Florence.Google Scholar
Faraguna, M. (2006). ‘Tra oralità e scrittura: diritto e forme della comunicazione dai poemi omerici a Teofrasto’, Dike 9: 63–91.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2013). ‘Kleos versus Stone? Lyric Poetry and Contexts for Memorialization’, in Low, P. and Liddel, P. (eds.) Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 231–53.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987). Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferrario, S. (2006). ‘Replaying Antigone: Changing Patterns of Public and Private Commemoration at Athens c. 440–350’, in Patterson, C. (ed.) Antigone’s Answer: Essays on Death and Burial, Family and State in Classical Athens. Helios Suppl. 33: 79–117.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2004). ‘Knowledge and True Belief in the Meno’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 41–81.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014). The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. (2010). ‘Kharis, Kharites, Festivals, and Social Peace in the Classical Greek City’, in Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I. (eds.) Valuing Others in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 71–112.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2006). The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (1998). ‘“The Mother of the Argument”: Eros and the Body in Sappho and Plato’s Phaedrus’, in Wyke, M. (ed.) Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity. Oxford: 39–70.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. (1996). ‘Guslar and Aoidos: Traditional Register in South Slavic and Homeric Epic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 126: 11–41.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1985). ‘The Seal of Theognis: The Politics of Authorship in Archaic Greece’, in Figueira, T. J. and Nagy, G. (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore: 82–95.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1999). ‘Reading Homer From the Rostrum: Poems and Laws in Aeschines’ Against Timarchus’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (ed.) Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge: 231–56.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002). The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2003). ‘From Letters to Literature: Reading the “Song Culture” of Classical Greece’, in Yunis, H. (ed.) Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: 15–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (1996). ‘Herodotos and His Contemporaries’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 116: 62–87.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (2001). ‘Early Historie and Literacy’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 95–115.Google Scholar
Foxhall, L., Gehrke, H.-J. and Luraghi, N. (eds.) (2010). Intentional History: Spinning Time in Ancient Greece. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1975). Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy: A History of Greek Epic, Lyric, and Prose to the Middle of the Fifth Century. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (1992). ‘The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: 279–95.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987). ‘Observations on Perception in Plato’s later Dialogues’, in Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: 3–10.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1990). ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Epistemology. Cambridge: 225–50.Google Scholar
Friis Johansen, H. and Whittle, E. W. (1980). Aeschylus: The Suppliants. 3 vols. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fronterotta, F. (2001). ΜΕΘΕΞΙΣ. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide. Pisa.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. (2011). ‘Life in a Line: A Reading of Dedicatory Epigrams From the Archaic to the Classical Period’, in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge: 151–66.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1980). Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. New Haven.Google Scholar
Galli, M. (2005). ‘Pilgrimage as Elite Habitus: Educated Pilgrims in Sacred Landscape During the Second Sophistic’, in Elsner, J. and Rutherford, I. (eds.) Pilgrimage in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Antiquity. Seeing the Gods. Oxford: 253–90.Google Scholar
Garcia, L. F., Jr. (2013). Homeric Durability: Telling Time in the Iliad. Washington, DC. [URL = http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebook:CHS_GarciaL.Homeric_Durability_Telling_Time_in_the_Iliad.2013.]Google Scholar
García Valdes, M., Llera Fueyo, L. A., and Rodríguez-Noriega Guillén, L. (2009). Claudius Aelianus. De Natura Animalium. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1985). Les cités grecques et leurs bienfaiteurs (Ive–Ier siècle av. J.-C.): contribution à l’histoire des institutions. Paris.Google Scholar
Gavran Miloš, A. (2012). ‘Epicurus on the Origin and Formation of Preconceptions’, Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12: 239–56.Google Scholar
Gavrilov, A. K. (1997). ‘Techniques of Reading in Classical Antiquity’, Classical Quarterly 47: 56–73.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. (2001). ‘Myth, History and Collective Identity: Uses of the Past in Ancient Greece and Beyond’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 286–313.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (2011). Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica. Da Omero al V secolo. 2nd edn. Milan.Google Scholar
Gentili, B., Catenacci, C., Giannini, P., and Lomiento, L. (2013). Pindaro: Le Olimpiche. Milan.Google Scholar
Gesner, C. (ed.) (1556). Claudii Aeliani praenestini pontificis et sophistae … opera, quae extant, omnia, graece latineque. Zurich.Google Scholar
Giangiulio, M. (2001). ‘Constructing the Past: Colonial Traditions and the Writing of History. The Case of Cyrene’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 116–37.Google Scholar
Giangiulio, M. (2010). ‘Le società ricordano? Paradigmi e problemi della “memoria collettiva” (a partire da Maurice Halbwachs)’, in Giangiulio, M. (ed.) Memorie coloniali. Rome: 29–43.Google Scholar
Giangiulio, M., Franchi, E., and Proietti, G. (eds.) (forthcoming). Commemorating War and War Dead. Ancient and Modern. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N., and Seaford, R. (eds.) (1998). Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1983). ‘Epicurean Semantics’, in Syzetesis: Studi sull’epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: vol. II, 185–226.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1987). ‘The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 107: 58–76.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice. Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2000). ‘Civic Ideology and the Problem of Difference: The Politics of Aeschylean Tragedy, Once Again’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 120: 34–56.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2009). ‘The Anecdote: Exploring the Boundaries Between Oral and Literate Performance in the Second Sophistic’, in Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds.) Ancient Literacies: the Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. Oxford and New York: 96–113.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J. (2007). ‘How is the Truth of Beings in the Soul? Interpreting Anamnesis in Plato’, Elenchos 28: 275–301.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2013). ‘Epistolary Epicureans’, in Hodkinson, O., Rosenmeyer, P. A. and Bracke, E. (eds.) Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden and Boston: 133–51.Google Scholar
Graf, F. (2009). ‘Serious Singing: The Orphic Hymns as Religious Texts’, Kernos 22: 169–82.Google Scholar
Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. (2007). Ritual Texts for the Afterlife. Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (2015). Stasis and Stability. Exile, the Polis, and Political Thought, ca. 404–146 bc. Oxford.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2009). ‘Greek Lyric and Early Greek Literary History’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2009). The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Cambridge (Mass.) and Washington.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2003). Asyl und Athen. Die Konstruktion kollektiver Identität in der griechischen Tragödie. Stuttgart and Weimar.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2007). ‘The Poetics of the Bath in the Iliad’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 103: 25–49.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2008). ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 128: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2010). The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century bce. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (1983). ‘ΔΙΑΘΕΣΙΣ in Epicuro’, in Syzetesis: Studi sull’epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: 93–109.Google Scholar
Gritti, E. (2005). ‘La φαντασία plotiniana tra illuminazione intellettiva e impassibilità dell’anima’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.) Studi sull’anima in Plotino. Naples: 251–74.Google Scholar
Grondin, J. (1982). ‘L’ἀλήθεια entre Platon et Heidegger’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 87: 551–6.Google Scholar
Guidelli, C. (1988). ‘Note sul tema della memoria nelle Enneadi di Plotino’, Elenchos 9: 75–94.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1952). Orpheus and Greek Religion: A Study of the Orphic Movement. Princeton.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1992). ‘Callimachus’ Lock of Berenice: Fantasy, Romance, and Propaganda’, American Journal of Philology 113: 359–85.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1996). ‘The Evidence for Theocritean Poetry Books’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Theocritus (Hellenistica Groningana II). Groningen: 119–48.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1998). ‘«Zur ewig währenden Erinnerung». Ein auf das Nachleben zielender Topos’, Chiron: 35–41.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969). ‘Épicure et l’enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, in Association Guillaume Budé. Actes VIIIe Congrès, Paris 5–10 avril 1968. Paris: 347–54.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1981). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris. [Engl. transl: (1995) Philosophy As a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden.]Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris (2nd edn. 1952). [Engl. transl.: (1992) On Collective Memory. Chicago.]Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. (1989). ‘The Archer Scene in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae’, Philologus 133: 38–54.Google Scholar
Hall, E. M. (1996). Aeschylus Persians, edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2007). ‘The Life-and-Death Journey of the Soul: Interpreting the Myth of Er’, in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: 445–73.Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (1996). ‘Il ruolo della prolepsis epicurea’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano. Naples: vol. I, 221–37.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. (2010). ‘The Life of the Author in the Letters of “Euripides”’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 50: 537–64.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. (2013). ‘Epitaphioi Mythoi and Tragedy as Encomium of Athens’, Trends in Classics 5: 289–317.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. (2017). ‘Archives, Repertoires, Bodies, and Bones: Thoughts on Reperformance for Classicists’, in Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.) Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture. Cambridge: 21–41Google Scholar
Hanson, R. and Mendius, R. (2009). Buddha’s Brain: The Practical Neuroscience of Happiness, Love and Wisdom. Oakland (Cal.)Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2012). Callimachus AETIA. Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2013). ‘Empedocles and the Muse of the Agathos Logos’, American Journal of Philology 134: 209–46.Google Scholar
Harriot, R. (1962). ‘Aristophanes’ Audience and the Plays of Euripides’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 9: 1–9.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M. (2006). Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens: Essays on Law, Society, and Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M., Leão, D. F., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.) (2010). Law and Drama in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2014). ‘Desire, Memory and the Authority of Soul: Plato Philebus 35C-D’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46: 33–72.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A. (2010). Zwischen Relikt und Reliquie. Objektbezogene Erinnerungspraktiken in Antiken Gesellschaften. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hartwig, A. (2014). ‘The Evolution of Comedy in the Fourth Century’, in Csapo, E., Goette, H. R., Green, J. R. and Wilson, P. (eds.) Greek Theatre in the Fourth Century bc. Berlin: 207–27.Google Scholar
Harvey, F. D. (1966). ‘Literacy in the Athenian Democracy’, Revue des Études Grecques 79: 585–635.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2000). ‘Phrynichos and his Muses’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.) The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. Swansea: 91–134.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1982). The Literate Revolution in Greece and its Cultural Consequences. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hawes, G. (ed.) (2017). Myths on the Map: The Storied Landscapes of Ancient Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hawke, J. (2011). Writing Authority: Elite Competition and Written Law in Early Greece. DeKalb (Ill.).Google Scholar
Hedrick, Ch. W., Jr. (1999). ‘Democracy and the Athenian Epigraphical Habit’, Hesperia 68: 387–439.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. A. J. (2010). ‘Merging Paradigms: Translating Pharaonic Ideology in Theocritus’ Idyll 17’, in Rollinger, R., Lang, M., Gufler, B., Madreiter, I. (eds.) Interkulturalität in der Alten Welt: Vorderasien, Hellas, Ägypten und die vielfältigen Ebenen des Kontakts. Wiesbaden: 383–408.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1998). ‘Plato’s Doctrine of Truth’, in McNeill, W. (ed.) Pathmarks. Cambridge: 155–82.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. (2011). Aletheia: eine Episode aus der Geschichte des Wahrheitsbegriffs. Meinz and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Helmig, C. (2012). Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1993). ‘The Tomb of Aias and the Prospect of Hero Cult in Sophokles’, Classical Antiquity 12: 165–80.Google Scholar
Henry, O. and Kelp, U. (eds.) (2016). Tumulus as Sema: Space, Politics, Culture and Religion in the First Millennium bc. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hercher, R. (1864). De natura animalium libri XVII, Varia historia, Epistolae, Fragmenta, vol. 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (1999). ‘The Rhetoric of Anti-rhetoric in Athenian Oratory’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.) Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge: 201–30.Google Scholar
Heßler, J. E. (2012). ‘Epikur/Epikureismus: Sklaverei im Kepos’, in Heinen, H. (ed.) Handwörterbuch der antiken Sklaverei. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (1972). Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. 2 vols. 2nd edn. Cambridge (Mass.) (1st edn: 1925).Google Scholar
Higbie, C. (2003). The Lindian Chronicle and the Greek Creation of their Past. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. and Rashed, M. (2008). ‘Platon: Phèdre 249b8-c1: les enjeux d’une faute d’onciales’, Revue des Études Grecques 121: 43–64.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2001). ‘Epic and Epiphanies: Herodotus and the New Simonides’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) The New Simonides, Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York: 135–47.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2008). A Commentary on Thucydides, vol. III: Books 5.25–8.109. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1985). The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1991). The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2003a). Theocritus. Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2003b). ‘Reflecting on Writing and Culture: Theocritus and the Style of Cultural Change’, in Yunis, H. (ed.) Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: 213–34.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012). Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (2017). Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. M. (2011). ‘Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30’, The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5: 262–82.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2007). ‘The Stoics and the Skeptics on Memory’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.) Tracce nella mente: teorie della memoria da Platone ai moderni. Pisa: 47–65.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. (1964). ‘Book Rolls on Attic Vases’, in Henderson, C. Jr. (ed.) Classical and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Berthold Louis Ullman, vol. I. Rome: 17–48.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. (1973). ‘More Book Rolls on Attic Vases’, Antike Kunst 16 (1973): 143–7.Google Scholar
Ireland, S. and Steel, F. L. (1975). ‘Phrenes as an Anatomical Organ in the Works of Homer’, Glotta 53: 183–94.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. and Morpurgo-Davies, A. (1970). ‘ΠΟΙΝΙΚΑΣΤΑΣ and ΠΟΙΝΙΚΑΖΕΝ: A New Archaic Inscription from Crete’, Kadmos 9: 118–54.Google Scholar
Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I. (2011). ‘Do not Drink the Water of Forgetfulness (OF 474–477)’, in Herrero de Jáuregui, M., Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., Santamaria, M. A. et al. (eds.) Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments in honour of Alberto Bernabé. Berlin: 165–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2012). ‘The Role of Eros in Improving the Pupil, or What Socrates Learned from Sappho’, in Johnson, M. and Tarrant, H. (eds.) Alcibiades and the Socratic Lover-Educator. London: 7–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2000). ‘Toward a Sociology of Reading in Classical Antiquity’, American Journal of Philology 121: 593–627.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2010). Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Reading Communities. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jost, K. (1935). Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei den attischen Rednern und Geschichtschreibern bis Demosthenes. Basel.Google Scholar
Jouan, F. and Van Looy, H. (eds.) (1998). Euripide, vol. 8. Fragments 1: Aigeus– Autolykos. Paris.Google Scholar
Julião, R., Lo Presti, R., Perler, D., and van der Eijk, P. (2016). ‘Mapping Memory: Theories in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Medicine’, eTopoi 6: 678–702.Google Scholar
Jung, M. (2006). Marathon und Plataiai: Zwei Perserschlachten als “lieux de mémoire” im antiken Griechenland. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (2006). ‘Plato on Recollection’, in Benson, H. H. (ed.) A Companion to Plato. Oxford: 119–32.Google Scholar
Kany-Turpin, J. (2007). ‘Les dieux. Représentation mentale des dieux, piété et discours théologique’, in Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.) Lire Épicure et les épicuriens. Paris: 145–65.Google Scholar
Karfik, F. (2014). ‘Parts of the Soul in Plotinus’, in Corcilius, K., Perler, D., and Helmig, C. (eds.) Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz. Berlin and New York: 107–48.Google Scholar
Kavoulaki, A. (2008). ‘The Last Word: Ritual, Power, and Performance in Euripides’ Hiketides’, in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. (eds.) Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin. Oxford: 291–317.Google Scholar
Keesling, C. M. (2009). ‘Exemplary Animals: Greek Animal Statues and Human Portraiture’, in Fögen, T. and Lee, M. (eds.) Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin and New York: 283–310.Google Scholar
Keynes, G. (1966). The Complete Writings of William Blake: With Variant Readings. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1998). ‘Claudius Aelianus und sein Werk’, Aufstieg und Niedergand der Römischen Welt II.34.4: 2954–96.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H. (2016). ‘Sensation in the Philebus: Common to Body and Soul’, in J. Jirsa and Š. Špinka (eds.) Plato’s Philebus: Proceedings of the 9th Plato Symposium Platonicum Pragense. Prague: 93–109.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1989 – first published Chapel Hill, 1965). A Commentary on Plato’s Meno. Chicago.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1963). ‘Zur epikureischen Terminologie’, Symbolae Osloenses 38: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, G. (1979). ‘Toward a Consistent Interpretation of the Protagoras’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 125–42.Google Scholar
Kloss, G. (2001). Erscheinungsformen komischen Sprechens bei Aristophanes. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1961). ‘The Ajax of Sophocles’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 65: 3–24.Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1968). ‘Silent Reading in Antiquity’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 9: 421–35.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2007). ‘Commentary on Morel’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 49–55.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2011). ‘Epicurus on the Gods’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge: 53–71.Google Scholar
Kottman, P. A. (2003). ‘Memory, “Mimesis,” Tragedy: The Scene before Philosophy’, Theatre Journal 55: 81–97.Google Scholar
Labarrière, J. L. (2000). ‘Sentir le temps, regarder un tableau: Aristotle et les images de la mémoire’, in Darbo-Péschanski, C. (ed.) Constructions du temps dans le monde grec ancien. Paris: 269–83.Google Scholar
Lai, A. (1997). ‘La circolazione delle tragedie eschilee in ambito simposiale’, Lexis 15: 143–8.Google Scholar
Lambert, S. (2010). ‘Connecting with the Past in Lykourgan Athens: an Epigraphic Perspective’, in Foxhall, L., Luraghi, N. and Gehrke, H.-J. (eds.) Intentional History: Spinning Time in Ancient Greece. Stuttgart: 225–38.Google Scholar
Lambrinoudakis, V. and Wörrle, M. (1983). ‘Ein hellenistischen Reformgesetz über das öffentliche Urkundenwesen von Paros’, Chiron 13: 283–368.Google Scholar
Lammermann, K. (1936). ‘Von der attischen Ürbanität und ihrer Auswirkung in der Sprache’. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. (1997). ‘Demosthenes, Dionysius and the dating of six early speeches’, Classica et Mediaevalia 48: 167–203.Google Scholar
Lang, H. S. (1980). ‘On Memory: Aristotle’s Corrections to Plato’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 18: 379–93.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (2008). ‘“Someone, I Say, Will Remember Us”: Oral Memory in Sappho’s Poetry’, in MacKckay, E. A. (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden and Boston: 79–96.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (2009). ‘The New Sappho Poem (P. Koln 21351 and 21376): Key to the Old Fragments’, in Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Cambridge (Mass.) and Washington: 41–57.Google Scholar
Laurand, V. (2003). ‘Le traitement épicurien de la douleur’, in Bénatouil, T., Laurand, V. and Macé, A. (eds.) L’Épicurisme antique. Paris: 91–117.Google Scholar
Lavaud, L. (2006). ‘La dianoia médiatrice entre le sensible et l’intelligible’, Etudes Platoniciennes 3: 29–55.Google Scholar
Ledesma, F. (2016). ‘Amor, lenguaje y olvido. Sobre memoria y desmemoria en los diálogos de Platón’, Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica 49: 91–109.Google Scholar
Lee, M.-K. (2008). ‘The Theaetetus’, in Fine, G. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford: 411–36.Google Scholar
Lembo, D. (1981–1982). ‘Typos e sympatheia in Epicuro’, Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia della Università di Napoli 24: 17–67.Google Scholar
Linguiti, A. (2004–2005). ‘Immagine e concetto in Aristotele e Plotino’, Incontri triestini di filologia classica 4: 69–80.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966). Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987). The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1999). ‘Mythology: Reflections from a Chinese Perspective’, in Buxton, R. (ed.) From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: 145–65.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. (eds.) (1978). Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971). ‘Aisthesis, Prolepsis and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18: 114–33.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986). The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge. [First published as L’Invention d’Athènes. Histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique’. Paris 1981.]Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1988). ‘De l’amnistie et de son contraire’, in Usages de l’Oubli. Paris: 23–48. [Engl. transl.: Loraux, 1998.]Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1997). La cité divisée. L’oubli dans la mémoire d’Athènes. Paris. [Engl. transl.: Loraux, 2002.]Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1998). Mothers in Mourning. With the Essay on Amnesty and its Opposite. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (2002). The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Lord, A. (ed.) (1954). Serbocroatian Heroic Songs – Collected by Milman Parry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Low, P., Oliver, G., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.) (2012). Cultures of Commemoration. War Memorials, Ancient and Modern. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luginbill, R. D. (2009). ‘The Occasion and Purpose of Alcman’s Partheneion (1 PMGF)’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 121: 27–54.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2010). ‘The Demos as Narrator: Public Honors and the Construction of Future and Past’, in Foxhall, L., Luraghi, N. and Gehrke, H.-J. (eds.) Intentional History: Spinning Time in ancient Greece. Stuttgart: 247–64.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2009). ‘City as Memory’, in Graziosi, B., Vasunia, P. and Boys-Stones, G. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies. Oxford: 248–59.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, B. (1993). The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Magrin, S. (2010). ‘Sensation and Scepticism in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 249–97.Google Scholar
Manolidis, G. (1987). Die Rolle der Physiologie in der Philosophie Epikurs. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2002). ‘Zeno on the unity of philosophy’, in Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S. (eds.). The Philosophy of Zeno. Larnaca: 59–79.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. and Deutscher, M. (1966). ‘Remembering’, Philosophical Review 75: 161–96.Google Scholar
Martinelli Tempesta, S. (1999). ‘Nota a Saffo, fr. 16, 12–13 V. (P.Oxy. 1231)’, Maia 69: 7–14.Google Scholar
Masi, F. (2014a). ‘Gli atomi ricordano? Fisicalismo e memoria nella psicologia di Epicuro’, Antiquorum Philosophia 8: 121–41.Google Scholar
Masi, F. (2014b). ‘The Method of Multiple Explanations: Epicurus and the Notion of Causal Possibility’, in Natali, C. and Viano, C. (eds.) AITIA II, Avec ou sans Aristote: Le débat sur les causes à l’âge hellénistique et impérial. Leuven: 37–63.Google Scholar
Masson, E. (1967). Recherches sur les plus anciens emprunts sémitiques en grec. Paris.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (1987). ‘Trame allusive e memoria del pubblico (Acarn. 300–301, Caval. 314)’, in Boldrini, S. et al. (eds.) Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a F. Della Corte, vol. 1, Letteratura greca. Urbino: 239–43.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (1997). ‘Pubblico e memoria teatrale nell’Atene di Aristofane’, in Thiercy, P. and Menu, M. (eds.) Aristophane: La langue, la scène, la cité. Actes du colloque de Toulouse. 17–19 mars 1994. Bari: 530–48.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (2006a). ‘La paratragodia, il libro, la memoria’, in Medda, E., Mirto, M. S., and Pattoni, M. P. (eds.) ΚΩΜΩΙΔΟΤΡΑΓΩΙΔΙΑ. Intersezioni del tragico e del comico nel teatro del V secolo a.C. Pisa: 137–91.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (2006b). ‘Aristofane a simposio’, in Vetta, M. and Catenacci, C. (eds.) I luoghi della poesia nella Grecia antica. Alessandria: 265–78.Google Scholar
Matelli, E. (2012). ‘Praxiphanes of Mytilene (called “of Rhodes”): The Sources, Text and Translation’, in Martano, A., Matelli, E. and Mirhady, D. (eds.) Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick (New Jersey): 1–156.Google Scholar
Mathieu, G. (1914). ‘Survivances des luttes politiques du Ve siècle chez les orateurs attiques du IVe siècle’, Revue de Philologie n.s. 38: 182–205.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R. and Lewis, D. M. (1988). A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century. 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1977). Urkunden dramatischer Aufführungen in Griechenland. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. (2005). Inszeniertes Lesevergnügen. Das inschriftliche Epigramm und seine Rezeption bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. (2013). ‘Inscriptions as Honors and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit’, Historia 62: 453–505.Google Scholar
Michaelian, K. and Sutton, J. (2017). ‘Memory’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 edition), Zalta, E. N. (ed.). [URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/memory/.]Google Scholar
Milanese, G. (1989). Lucida carmina. Comunicazione e scrittura da Epicuro a Lucrezio. Milan.Google Scholar
Milanese, G. (1996). ‘Aspetti del rapporto fra tra denominazione e referenzialità in Epicuro e nella tradizione epicurea’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano. Naples: vol. I, 269–86.Google Scholar
Milanezi, S. (2000). ‘Le suffrage du rire, ou le spectacle du politique en Grèce’, in Desclos, M.-L. (ed.) Le Rire des Grecs. Anthropologie du rire en Grèce ancienne. Grenoble: 369–96.Google Scholar
Milanezi, S. (2011). ‘Spectacles de l'amitié et de la haine dans les concours en l'honneur de Dionysos’, in Peigney, J. (ed.) Amis et Ennemis en Grèce ancienne. Bordeaux: 141–59.Google Scholar
Millis, B. W. and Olson, D. S. (2012). Inscriptional Records for the Dramatic Festivals in Athens: IG II2 2318–2325 and Related Texts. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. (2001). Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. (2016). ‘Heritage in the Landscape: The “Heroic Tumuli” in the Troad Region’, in McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I. (eds.) Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination. Leiden: 255–75.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988). Epicurus’ Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Moggi, M. (2009). ‘Strategie e forme della riconciliazione: μὴ μνησικακεῖν’, I quaderni del ramo d’oro 2: 167–91.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1999). ‘Anathēma kai Ktēma: the Inscriptional Inheritance of Ancient Historiography’, Histos 3: 27–69.Google Scholar
Montero, B. (2010). ‘Does Bodily Awareness Interfere with Highly Skilled Movement?’, Inquiry 5: 105–22.Google Scholar
Moore, C. (2015). ‘Socrates and Self-knowledge in Aristophanes’ Clouds’, Classical Quarterly 65: 534–51.Google Scholar
Moore, T. (1989). The Planets Within: the Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino. 2nd edn. Great Barrington (Mass.).Google Scholar
Morel, J.-P. (2006). ‘Mémoire et caractère – Aristote et l’histoire personnelle’, in Brancacci, A. and Gigliotti, G. (eds.) Mémoire et souvenir. Six études sur Platon, Aristote, Hegel et Husserl. Rome: 49–87.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2003). ‘Épicure et la “fin de la nature”’, in Bénatouil, T., Laurand, V. and Macé, A. (eds.) L’Épicurisme antique. Paris: 167–96.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2007). ‘Method and Evidence: on the Epicurean Preconception’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 25–48.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (2009). ‘The Emesan Connection: Philostratus and Heliodorus’, in Demoen, K. and Praet, D. (eds.) Theios Sophistes: Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii. Leiden and Boston: 263–81.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007). The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2011). ‘Callimachus’ Muses’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden and Boston: 329–48.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2013). ‘Speaking from the Tomb? The Disappearing Epitaph of Simonides in Calimachus, Aetia fr. 64 Pf.’, in Low, P. and Liddel, P. (eds.) Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 289–301.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004). Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1996). ‘Reflecting Sappho’, in Greene, E. (ed.) Re-Reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 11–35.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. (2010). ‘Helen’s Hands: Weaving for Kleos in the Odyssey’, Helios 37: 1–21.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. (2016). Objects as Actors: Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy. Chicago.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1981). ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (2004). ‘The Muses and their arts’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. J. (eds.) Music and the Muses: The Culture of ‘Mousike’ in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 365–89.Google Scholar
Murray, P. and Wilson, P. J. (eds.) (2004). Music and the Muses: The Culture of ‘Mousike’ in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979). The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2009). ‘The “New Sappho” Reconsidered in the Light of the Athenian Reception of Sappho’, in Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Cambridge (Mass.) and Washington: 176–99.Google Scholar
Nassen, P. J. (1975). ‘A Literary Study of Pindar’s Olympian 10’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 105: 219–40.Google Scholar
Natali, C. (1986). ‘Aristote et les méthodes d’enseignement de Gorgias’, in Cassin, B. (ed.) Positions de la sophistique. Paris: 105–16.Google Scholar
Nervegna, S. (2014). ‘Performing Classics: The Tragic Canon in the Fourth Century and Beyond’, in Csapo, E., Goette, H. R., Green, J. R. and Wilson, P. (eds.) Greek Theatre in the Fourth Century B.C. Berlin: 157–86.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H. G. (1990). Die attische Mittlere Komödie: ihre Stellung in der antiken Literaturkritik und Literaturgeschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nieddu, G. F. (1984). ‘La metafora della memoria come scrittura e l’immagine dell’animo come deltos’, Quaderni di Storia 19: 213–9.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1980). Zur Genealogie der Moral, in Colli, G. and Montinari, M. (eds.) Sämtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 5. Munich and New York.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nikkanen, A. (2012). ‘A Note on Memory and Reciprocity in Homer’s Odyssey’, in Bers, V. et al. (eds.) Donum natalicium digitaliter confectum Gregorio Nagy septuagenario a discipulis collegis familiaribus oblatum. Washington. (URL = http://chs.harvard.edu/wa/pageR?tn=ArticleWrapper&bdc=12&mn=4616 - n.7).Google Scholar
Nikulin, D. (2014). ‘Memory and Recollection in Plotinus’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96: 183–201.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (1989). ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’, Representations 26: 7–24.Google Scholar
Nørby, S., Lange, M., and Larsen, A. (2010). ‘Forgetting to Forget: On the Duration of Voluntary Suppression of Neutral and Emotional Memories’, Acta Psychologica 133: 73–80.Google Scholar
North, H. (1952). ‘The Use of Poetry in the Training of the Ancient Orator’, Traditio 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
Notopoulos, J. A. (1938). ‘Mnemosyne in Oral Literature’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69: 465–93.Google Scholar
Nouhaud, M. (1986). ‘Sur une allusion d’Eschine (Ambassade, 75) au stratège athénien Tolmidès’, Revue des Études Grecques 99: 342–6.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998). Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1980). ‘Aristophanes and Socrates on Learning Practical Wisdom’, Yale Classical Studies 26: 43–97.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Oksenberg Rorty, A. (eds.) (1992). Essays on Aristotle’s De anima. Oxford.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2016). ‘The Newest Sappho: Text, Apparatus Criticus, and Translation’, in Bierl, A. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) The Newest Sappho: P. Sapph. Obbink and P.GC inv. 105, frs. 1–4. Leiden and Boston: 13–33.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1989). Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. and Strauss, B. (1990). ‘Drama, Political Rhetoric and the Discourse of Athenian Democracy’, in Winkler, J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds.) Nothing to do with Dionysos? Princeton: 237–70.Google Scholar
Olding, G. (2007). ‘Myth and Writing in Aeschines’ Against Timarchus’, in Cooper, C. (ed.) Politics of Orality. Leiden: 155–70.Google Scholar
Onians, R. B. (1951). The Origins of European Thought About the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time, and Fate. Oxford.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (2007). Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2011). ‘Local Environment, Memory, and the Formation of the Citizen in Classical Attica’, in Lambert, S. D. (ed.) Sociable Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of Nick Fisher. Swansea: 25–43.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. and Rhodes, P. J. (2017). Greek Historical Inscriptions 479–404 bc. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. (1986). From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-century Athens. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Otto, W. F. (1956). Die Musen und der göttliche Ursprung des Singens und Sagens. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pantelia, M. C. (1993). ‘Spinning and Weaving: Ideas of Domestic Order in Homer’, American Journal of Philology 114: 493–501.Google Scholar
Pantelia, M. C. (2002). ‘Helen and the Last Song for Hector’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 132: 21–7.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1996). ‘Sappho Schoolmistress’, in Greene, E. (ed.) Re-Reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 146–86.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1998). ‘Pleasing Thighs: Reciprocity in Greek Religion’, in Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N. and Seaford, R. (eds.) Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford: 105–25.Google Scholar
Parry, M. and Parry, A. (eds.) (1971). The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parsons, R. G. (2016). ‘Aristotle on Remembering and Recollecting’. Dissertation, Princeton.Google Scholar
Pataki, E. (2015) ‘Variations sur l’immortalité: Tithon et la cigale chez Sappho (fragment 58) et dans la tradition homérique’, Gaia 18: 535–47.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. (1941). ‘Historical Allusions in the Attic Orators’, Classical Philology 36: 209–29.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. (1986). Aristotle’s Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (1992). ‘Sappho 16, Gorgias’ Helen, and the Preface to Herodotus’ Histories’, Yale Classical Studies 29: 63–84.Google Scholar
Pender, E. E. (2007). ‘Sappho and Anacreon in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Leeds International Classical Studies 6: 1–57.Google Scholar
Pender, E. E. (2011). ‘A Transfer of Energy: Lyric Eros in Phaedrus’, in Destrée, P. and Hermann, F.-G. (eds.) Plato and the Poets. Leiden and Boston: 327–48.Google Scholar
Penner, T. (2013). ‘The Wax Tablet, Logic and Protagoreanism’, in Boys-Stones, G., El Murr, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) The Platonic Art of Philosophy. Cambridge: 186–220.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. (1961). ‘The Historical Example, Its Use and Importance in the Attic Orators’, Scripta Hierosolymitana 7: 150–66.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. (1964). ‘Quotations from Poetry in Attic Orators of the Fourth Century bc’, American Journal of Philology 85: 155–72.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. (2013). ‘Inscribed Epigrams in Orators and Epigrammatic Collections’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.) Inscriptions and Their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 197–213.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. (2016). ‘Archaic Funerary Epigram and Hector’s Imagined Epitymbia’, in Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. (eds.) Homeric Receptions Across Generic and Cultural Contexts. Berlin: 45–58.Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. (2016). ‘On Finding Homer: The Impact of Homeric Scholarship on the Perception of South Slavic oral traditional poetry’, in Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. (eds.) Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts. Berlin: 315–28.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship: from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. (1988). The Dramatic Festivals of Athens. Second edition (1968) revised with a new supplement (1988) by Gould, J. and Lewis, D. M.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Podolak, P. (2010). ‘Questioni Pitoclee’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Folge 34: 39–80.Google Scholar
Polansky, R. M. (1992). Philosophy and Knowledge: A Commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus. Lewisburg and London.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1984). Women in Hellenistic Egypt: From Alexander to Cleopatra. New York.Google Scholar
Popescu, C. (2014). ‘Memory and Forgetfulness’, in Roisman, H. M. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Greek Tragedy. 3 vols. Malden: vol. II, 809–12.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010). The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pretagostini, R. (2009). ‘Occasioni di performances musicali in Callimaco e in Teocrito’, in Martinelli, M. C. (ed.) La Musa dimenticata. Aspetti dell’esperienza musicale greca in età ellenistica. Pisa: 3–30.Google Scholar
Price, S. (2012). ‘Memory and Ancient Greece’, in Dignas, B. and Smith, R. R. R. (eds.) Historical and Religious Memory in the Ancient World. Oxford: 15–36.Google Scholar
Privitera, G. A. (1967). ‘Su una nuova interpretazione di Saffo fr. 16 LP’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 4: 182–7.Google Scholar
Proietti, G. (2012). ‘Memoria collettiva e identità etnica: nuovi paradigmi teorico-metodologici nella ricerca storica’, in Franchi, E. and Proietti, G. (eds.) Forme della memoria e dinamiche identitarie dell’antichità greco-romana. Trento: 13–41.Google Scholar
Purves, A. C. (2010). Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1989–1990). ‘Sappho, fr. 16 L-P and Alkaios, fr. 42 L-P. Romantic and Classical Strains in Lesbian Lyric’, Classical Journal 85: 16–33.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2006). ‘Notes on the Interpretation of the “New Sappho”’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 157: 1–7.Google Scholar
Rayor, D. J. (2005). ‘The Power of Memory in Erinna and Sappho’, in Greene, E. (ed.) Women Poets in Ancient Greece and Rome. Norman (Okl.): 59–71.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. (2006a). Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. (2006b). ‘The Competence of Theatre Audiences in Fifth- and Fourth-Century Athens’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 126: 99–124.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P. J. (2003). ‘Nothing to Do With Democracy: Athenian Drama and the Polis’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 123: 104–19.Google Scholar
Riccardo, A. (1999). ‘Immaginazione e reminiscenza. (Qualche considerazione sul De memoria et reminiscentia di Aristotele)’, in Formigari, L., Casertano, G. and Cubeddu, I. (eds.) Imago in phantasia depicta. Studi sulla teoria dell’immaginazione. Rome: 123–37.Google Scholar
Riddell, J. (1877). Apology: With a rev. text and English notes, and a digest of Platonic idioms. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rink, A. (1997). Mensch und Vogel bei römischen Naturschriftstellern und Dichtern: untersucht insbesondere bei Plinius, Älian und Ovid. Frankfurt am Main and New York.Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M. (2004). ‘Tra oralità e scrittura. L’ingresso della memoria nella trattatistica retorica’, in Cerasuolo, S. (ed.) Mathesis e Mneme. Studi in memoria di Marcello Gigante. Naples: vol. I, 105–30.Google Scholar
Rodighiero, A. (2016). ‘“Sail with your Fortune”: Wisdom and Defeat in Euripides’ Trojan Women’, in Kyriakou, P. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Wisdom and Folly in Euripides. Berlin: 177–93.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L and Wertsch, J. V. (2008). ‘Creating a New Discipline of Memory Studies’, Memory Studies 1: 9–22.Google Scholar
Roselli, A. (2007). Ἅναπεμπάζεσθαι: termine tecnico del lessico della memoria’, AION 29: 111–26.Google Scholar
Roselli, A. (2008). ‘Solita noctis hora consurgens. Insegnamento e apprendimento nelle Recognitiones pseudoclementine: il ruolo della memoria’, in Filologia, papirologia, storia dei testi. Giornate di studio in onore di Antonio Carlini. Pisa and Rome: 289–315.Google Scholar
Roselli, A. (2013). ‘οἷον ἐγκαύματα: una metafora platonica nel Timeo di Platone’, in Pino Campos, L. M. and Santana Henríquez, G. (eds.) Homenaje al Profesor Juan Antonio López Férez. Καλὸς καὶ ἀγαθὸς ἀνήρ. διδασκάλου παράδειγμα. Madrid: 741–7.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2000). ‘Cratinus’ Pytine and the Construction of the Comic Self’, in Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.) The Rivals of Aristophanes: Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. Swansea: 23–39.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. (1993). ‘Shouting “Fire” in a Crowded Theater: Phrynichos’ Capture of Miletos and the Politics of Fear in Early Attic Tragedy’, Philologus 137: 159–96.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1975). ‘Ein Gedicht und sein Publikum. Überlegegungen zu Sappho Fr. 44 Lobel-Page’, Hermes 103: 275–85.Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. (1991). ‘Logoi sokratikoi anteriori al 399 a. C.’, in Rossetti, L. and Bellini, O. (eds.) Logos e logoi. Naples: 21–40.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. (2003). ‘La toile d’Hélène (Iliade III, 125–128)’, in Broze, M., Couloubaritsis, L. et al. (eds.) Le mythe d’Hélène. Brussels and Paris: 9–43Google Scholar
Rubinstein, L. (2013). ‘Forgive and Forget? Amnesty in the Hellenistic Period’, in Harter-Uibopuu, K. and Mitthof, F. (eds.) Vergeben und Vergessen? Amnestie in der Antike. Vienna: 127–61.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. (ed.) (2011). The Birth of Comedy: Texts, Documents, and Art from Athenian Comic Competitions, 486–280. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2001). Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2013). ‘Strictly Ballroom: Egyptian Mousike and Plato’s Comparative Poetics’, in Peponi, A. E. (ed.) Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: 67–84.Google Scholar
Ruzé, F. (1988). ‘Aux débuts de l’écriture politique: le pouvoir de l’écrit dans la cité’, in Detienne, M. (ed.) Les savoirs de l’écriture en Grèce antique. Lille: 82–94.Google Scholar
Saetta-Cottone, R. (2003). ‘Agathon, Euripide et le thème de la μίμησις dramatique dans les Thesmophories d’Aristophane’, Revue des Études Grecques 116: 445–69.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. (2007). ‘Aristotele fenomenologo della memoria’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.) Tracce nella mente. Teorie della memoria da Platone ai moderni. Pisa: 25–46.Google Scholar
Scheer, T. S. (1996). ‘Ein Museum griechischer „Frühgeschichte” im Apollontempel von Sikyon’, Klio 78: 353–73.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. and Svenbro, J. (1996). The Craft of Zeus: Myths of Weaving and Fabric. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Scheiter, K. M. (2012). ‘Images, Appearances and Phantasia in Aristotle’, Phronesis 57: 251–78.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1992). ‘Prose Usages of ΑΚΟΥΕΙΝ, “To Read”’, Classical Quarterly 42: 129–41.Google Scholar
Schettino, M. T. (2005). ‘Il passato e il presente di Roma nell’opera di Eliano’, in Troiani, L. and Zecchini, G. (eds.) La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell’impero romano. Rome: 283–307.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1989). ‘Pedetemptin progredientis (Lucr. 5, 533)’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 117: 286–96.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. (1991). ‘Platon, Philebos, Timaios, Kritias, Griechisch und Deutsch’, in Platon. Sämtliche Werke VIII. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schlesier, R. (2010). ‘Tragic Memories of Dionysos’, in Foxhall, L., Gehrke, H.-J. and Luraghi, N. (eds.) Intentional History. Spinning Time in Ancient Greece. Stuttgart: 245–63.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1961). ‘Epikur’, in T. Klauser (ed.) Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, vol. V, 681–819.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. (2010). ‘Speaker and Addressee in Early Greek Epigram and Lyric’, in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge: 25–41.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1978). ‘Aristotle on the Imagination’, in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. (eds.) Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: 99–140.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1992). ‘Inscriptions, Absence and Memory: Epic and Early Epitaph’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 3: 57–76.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1997). ‘Teichoscopia, Catalogue, and the Female Spectator in Euripides’, Colby Quarterly 33: 76–93.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2002). ‘Homeric Signs and Flashbulb Memory’, in Worthington, I. and Foley, J. M. (eds.) Epea and Grammata: Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece. Leiden: 99–116.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2008). ‘Social Memory in Aeschylus’ Oresteia’, in Mackay, E. A. (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden: 115–41.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1995). Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. (1999–2000). ‘Tradition and Invention in Euripidean Aetiology’, Illinois Classical Studies 24–25: 217–33.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (2009). ‘Aitiologies of Cult in Euripides: A Response to Scott Scullion’, in Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. R. (eds.) The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp. Leiden: 221–34.Google Scholar
Sealey, R. (1967). ‘Pseudo-Demosthenes XIII and XXV’, Revue des Études Grecques 80: 250–5.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1973). ‘Epicurus, On nature, Book XXVIII’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 5–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2004). The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2011). ‘Epicurus’ Theological Innatism’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge: 29–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2017). ‘Epicurean Versus Cyrenaic Happiness’, in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J. and Wright, M. (eds.) Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford: 89–106.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1971). ‘Andromache’s Anagnorisis: Formulaic Artistry in Iliad 22: 437–76’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 75: 33–57.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1989). ‘Song, Ritual and Commemoration in Early Greek Poetry and Tragedy’, Oral Tradition 4: 330–59.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1995). Sophocles’ Tragic World: Divinity, Nature, Society, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Senor, T. D. (2009). ‘Epistemological Problems of Memory’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Autumn 2009 edition). [URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/memory-episprob/.]Google Scholar
Seremetakis, C. N. (1991). The Last Word: Women, Death and Divination in Inner Mani. Chicago.Google Scholar
Shear, J. L. (2011). Polis and Revolution: Responding to Oligarchy in Classical Athens. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Shear, J. L. (2012). ‘The Politics of the Past: Remembering Revolution at Athens’, in Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C. A. (eds.) Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History without Historians. Edinburgh: 276–300.Google Scholar
Shear, J. L. (2013). ‘“Their Memories Will Never Grow Old”: The Politics of Remembrance in the Athenian Funeral Orations’, Classical Quarterly 63: 511–36.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. (1967). ‘Memory’, in Edwards, P. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 5. New York and London: 265–74.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, G. S. (2014). ‘Memory and History in the Ancient World’, in Berger, S. and Niven, B. (eds.) Writing the History of Memory. London: 25–45.Google Scholar
Sickinger, J. P. (1999). Public Records and Archives in Classical Athens. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Sickinger, J. P. (2009). ‘Nothing to Do with Democracy: Formulae of Disclosure and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit’, in Mitchell, L. and Rubinstein, L. (eds.) Greek Epigraphy and History: Essays in honour of P. J. Rhodes. Swansea: 87–102.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2001). ‘Fragments 1–22 W2. Text, Apparatus Criticus and Translation’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) The New Simonides, Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York: 13–29.Google Scholar
Silk, M. (1974). Interaction in Poetic Imagery, with Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Simondon, M. (1982). La mémoire et l’oubli dans la pensée grecque jusqu’à la fin de Ve siècle av. J-C. Psychologie archaïque, mythes et doctrines. Paris.Google Scholar
Skarsouli, P. (2006). ‘Calliope, a Muse Apart: Some Remarks on the Tradition of Memory as a Vehicle of Oral Justice’, Oral Tradition 21: 210–28.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. (1988). ‘Making the Aristophanic Audience’, American Journal of Philology 120: 351–68.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. (2002). Spectator Politics: Metatheatre and Performance in Aristophanes. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Small, J. P. (1997). Wax Tablets of the Mind: Cognitive Studies of Memory and Literacy in Classical Antiquity. London and New York.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (2012). ‘Foreword: Memory History, Forgetting’, in Bommas, M., Harrisson, J. and Roy, P. (eds.) Memory and Urban Religion in the Ancient World. London and New York: xiv–xxv.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. (2014). Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelianus. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1924). Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonische Philosophie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1953). The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M. (1981). ‘The Web of Song: Weaving Imagery in Homer and the Lyric Poets’, Classical Journal 76: 193–6.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1989). Aeschylus, Eumenides. Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1994). The Comedies of Aristophanes. Vol. 8. Thesmophoriazusae. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. and Bayliss, A. J. (2013). Oath and State in Ancient Greece. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2006). Self: Ancient and Modern Insights About Individuality, Life, and Death. Chicago.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1995). ‘Reading’ Greek Death: To the End of the Classical Period. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2002). ‘Secularizing the Muse’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. (eds.) Cultivating the Muses: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature. Oxford: 1–28.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2007). ‘Ancient Stoicism, “Robust Epistemology”, and Moral Philosophy’, in Machamer, P. and Wolters, G. (eds.) Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics. Pittsburgh: 37–46.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2012). ‘Physics as Philosophy of Happiness: The Transmission of Scientific Tenets in Epicurus’, in Sgarbi, M. (ed.) Translatio studiorum: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Bearers of Intellectual History. Leiden: 25–36.Google Scholar
Stafford, E. (2000). Worshipping Virtues: Personification and the Divine in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
Stamm, C. (2003). Vergangenheitsbezug in der Zweiten Sophistik: die Varia Historia des Claudius Aelianus. Frankfurt am Main and New York.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (2001). ‘A Bard of the Iron Age and his Auxiliary Muse’, in Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) The New Simonides, Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York: 106–19.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. K. (2013a). ‘Contesting the Lessons of the Past: Aeschines’ Use of Social Memory’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 142: 65–103.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. K. (2013b). Social Memory in Athenian Public Discourse: Uses and Meanings of the Past. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (1993). ‘Pindar’s “Oggetti Parlanti”’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 159–80.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (1994). The Tyrant’s Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (1999). ‘To Praise, not to Bury: Simonides fr. 531P’, Classical Quarterly 49: 383–95.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (2001). Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar
Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (eds.) (2010). Die griechische Welt. Erinnerungsorte der Antike. Munich.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. (2003). Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1970). Peras und Apeiron: das Problem der Formen in Platons Philebos. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1990). ‘The Problem of the Criterion’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Epistemology. Cambridge: 143–60.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2010). ‘Memory’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer). [URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/memory/.]Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1984). ‘La stratégie de l’amour. Modèle de la guerre et théorie de l’amour dans la poésie de Sappho’, Quaderni di storia 19: 57–79.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1993). Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece. Ithaca (NY). (First published as (1988) Phrasikleia. Anthropologie de la lecture en Grèce ancienne. Paris.)Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. (2011). ‘Dalla potenzialità all’attualità: Un’introduzione al problema della memoria in Plotino’, in Bénatouïl, T., Maffi, E. and F. Trabattoni, (eds.) Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity. Hildesheim: 139–59.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (2010). ‘Antifane, Antigone e la malleabilità del teatro tragico’, in Belardinelli, A. M. and Greco, G. (eds.) Antigone e le Antigoni. Storia, forme, fortuna di un mito. Florence: 27–36.Google Scholar
Taub, L. (2009). ‘Cosmology and Meteorology’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 105–24.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, A. (1985). ‘L’invio del carme nella poesia lirica arcaica: Pindaro e Bacchilide’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 78: 29–54.Google Scholar
Tell, D. (2006). ‘Beyond Mnemotechnics: Confession and Memory in Augustine’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 39: 233–53.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1990). ‘Il contributo di Metrodoro di Lampsaco alla formazione della teoria epicurea del linguaggio’, Cronache Ercolanesi 20: 17–25.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (2010). ‘Le lettere private del Kepos: Metrodoro, i maestri e gli amici epicurei (PHerc. 176 e PHerc. 1418)’, in Antoni, A., Arrighetti, G., Bertagna, M. I. and Delattre, D. (eds.) Miscellanea Papyrologica Herculanensia. Pisa and Rome: 37–59.Google Scholar
Teske, R. (2001). ‘Augustine’s Philosophy of Memory’, in Stump, E. and Kretzmann, N. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge: 148–58.Google Scholar
Thein, K. (2012). ‘Imagination, Self-awareness and Thought in the Philebus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 109–49.Google Scholar
Thévenaz, O. (2015). ‘Sappho’s Soft Heart and Kypris’ Light Wounds: The Restoration of the Helen Poem (esp. Sa. 16.13–14) and Ovid’s Sappho Epistle’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 196: 31–43.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000). Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2001). ‘Herodotus’ Histories and the Floating Gap’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.) The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 198–210.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2009). ‘Writing, Reading, Public and Private “Literacies”: Functional Literacy and Democratic Literacy in Greece’, in Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. R. (eds.) Ancient Literacies. Oxford: 13–46.Google Scholar
Tornau, C. (2009). ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un individu? Unité, individualité et conscience de soi dans la métaphysique plotinienne de l’âme’, Les études philosophiques 90: 333–60.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. C. (2014). ‘6 Ways to Give Oaths Extra-sanctity’, in Sommerstein, A. H. and Torrance, I. C. (eds.) Oaths and Swearing in Ancient Greece. Berlin: 132–55.Google Scholar
Trabattoni, F. (2012). ‘Myth and Truth in Plato’s Phaedrus’, in Collobert, C., Destrée, P. and Gonzalez, F. (eds.) Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Leiden and Boston: 305–21.Google Scholar
Treu, M. (1999). Undici cori comici. Aggressività, derisione e techniche drammatiche in Aristofane. Genoa.Google Scholar
Trevett, J. (1994). ‘Demosthenes’ Speech On Organization (Dem. 13)’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 35: 179–93.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2006). ‘Rationality and the Fear of Death in Epicurean Philosophy’, Rhizai 3: 79–117.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. (2010). ‘The Passer-By in Archaic and Classical Epigram’, in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge: 42–60.Google Scholar
Tulli, M. (2000). ‘L’epitome di Epicuro e la trasmissione del sapere nel Medioplatonismo’, in Erler, M. and Bees, R. (eds.) Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: 109–21.Google Scholar
Tulli, M. (2008). ‘Isocrate storico del pensiero: Antistene, Platone, gli eristi nell’Encomio di Elena’, in Rossetti, L. and Stravru, A. (eds.) Socratica 2005. Studi sulla letteratura socratica antica presentati alle Giornate di studio di Senigallia. Bari: 91–105.Google Scholar
Tulli, M. (2014). ‘Epicuro a Pitocle: La forma didattica del testo’, in Tulli, M. (ed.) Φιλία: Dieci contributi per Gabriele Burzacchini. Bologna: 67–78.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2007). ‘Are There 256 Different Kinds of Memory?’, in Nairne, J. S. (ed.) The Foundations of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Henry L. Roediger, III. New York: 39–52.Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. and Hunter, R. (eds.) (2017). Imagining Reperformance in Classical Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1977). Glossarium Epicureum edendum curaverunt M. Gigante et W. Schmid. Rome.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. (2012). ‘Madness into Memory: Mania and Mneme in Greek Culture’, Scripta Classica Israelica 31: 109–31.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. (1997). ‘Towards a Rhetoric of Ancient Scientific Discourse: Some Formal Characteristics of Greek Medical and Philosophical Texts (Hippocratic Corpus, Aristotle)’, in Bakker, E. J. (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation. Leiden: 77–129.Google Scholar
van Effenterre, H. (1973). ‘Le contrat de travail du scribe Spensithios’, Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 97: 31–46.Google Scholar
van Looy, H. (1964). Zes verloren Tragedie van Euripides: Studie met kritische uitgave en vertaling der fragmenten. Brussels.Google Scholar
van Minnen, P. (2001). ‘Luke 4. 17–20 and the Handling of Ancient Books’, Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 52: 689–90.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. (2004). Mutilation and Transformation: Damnatio Memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Vasunia, P. (2001). The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Vatri, A. (2015). ‘Ancient Greek Writing for Memory: Textual Features as Mnemonic Facilitators’, Mnemosyne 68: 750–73.Google Scholar
Velardi, R. (1991). ‘Le origini dell’inno in prosa tra V e IV secolo a.C.: Menandro Retore e Platone’, in Cassio, A. C. and Cerri, G. (eds.) L’inno tra rituale e letteratura nel mondo antico. Rome: 205–31.Google Scholar
Velardi, R. (2001). Retorica filosofia letteratura: saggi di storia della retorica greca su Gorgia, Platone e Anassimene di Lampsaco. Naples.Google Scholar
Velardi, R. (2007). ‘Memoria rerum e memoria verborum nel Fedro di Platone (228d1-4)’, AION 29: 39–49.Google Scholar
Verde, F. (2011). ‘Minimi in movimento? Note sulle coll. XLVIII-L Puglia del PHerc. 1012 (Demetrii Laconis Opus incertum)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 41: 49–61.Google Scholar
Verde, F. (2016). ‘Epicuro nella testimonianza di Cicerone: la dottrina del criterio’, in Tulli, M. (ed.) Testo e forme del testo: Ricerche di filologia filosofica. Pisa and Rome: 335–68.Google Scholar
Verde, F. (forthcoming). ‘L’empirismo di Teofrasto e la meteorologia epicurea’, Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1988). Commentaries on Pindar: Olympian Odes 1, 10, 11; Nemean 11; Isthmian 2. Leiden.Google Scholar
Verlinsky, A. (2005). ‘Epicurus and His Predecessors on the Origin of Language’, in Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: 56–100.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1959). ‘Aspects mythiques de la Mémoire et du temps’, Journal de Psychologie 56: 1–29. [Repr. in Vernant, 1965: 51–78; Engl. transl. in Vernant, 1983: 75–105; and in Vernant, 2006: 115–38.]Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1960). ‘Le fleuve “Amélès” et la “Mélétè Thanatou”’, Revue philosophique 150: 163–79. [Repr. in Vernant, 1965: 79–94; Engl. transl. in Vernant, 1983.]Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1965). Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Études de psychologie historique. Paris. [Translated into English as Vernant, 1983.]Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (2006). Myth and Thought Among the Greeks. New York (translation of the new, enlarged French edition 1996).Google Scholar
Vestrheim, G. (2010). ‘Voice in Sepulchral Epigrams: Some Remarks on the Use of First and Second Person in Sepulchral Epigrams, and a Comparison with Lyric Poetry’, in Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram. Cambridge: 61–78.Google Scholar
Vivian, B. (2010). Public Forgetting: The Rhetoric and Politics of Beginning Again. University Park.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994). ‘Anamnesis in the Meno’, in Day, J. (ed.) Plato’s Meno in Focus. London and New York: 88–111.Google Scholar
Voelke, P. (2004). ‘Euripide, héros et poète comique: à propos des Acharniens et des Thesmophories d’Aristophane’, in Calame, C. (ed.) Poétique d’Aristophane et langue d’Euripide en dialogue. Paris: 117–38.Google Scholar
Wagner-Hasel, B. (2011). ‘Mnemosyne – die Göttin der Erinnerung: Zum Verhältnis von Traditionsbildung und Geschlecht in der Antike’, in Brandt, H., Auer, A. M., Brehm, J., de Brasi, D. and Hörl, L. K. (eds.) Genus und Generatio. Rollenerwartungen und Rollenerfüllungen im Spannungsfeld der Geschlechter und Generationen in Antike und Mittelalter. Bamberg: 23–48.Google Scholar
Walters, K. R. (1981). ‘“We Fought Alone at Marathon”: Historical Falsification in the Attic Funeral Oration’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 124: 204–11.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2001). ‘Lucretian Palingenesis Recycled’, Classical Quarterly 51: 499–508.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2009). ‘Removing Fear’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 234–48.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2014). The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (1993). Dichtung und höfische Gesellschaft. Die Rezeption von Zeitgeschichte am Hof der ersten drei Ptolemäer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Werner, D. S. (2012). Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
West, T. G. and West, G. S. (1984.) Aristophanes: Clouds, in Plato and Aristophanes: Four Texts on Socrates. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2007). ‘Prose Literature and the Severan Dynasty’, in Swain, S., Harrison, S. and Elsner, J. (eds.) Severan Culture. Cambridge and New York: 29–51.Google Scholar
Wifstrand Schiebe, M. (2003). ‘Sind die epikureischen Götter “thought-constructs”?’, Mnemosyne 56: 703–27.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2008). ‘Automatic Action in Plotinus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 443–77.Google Scholar
Wills, G. (1967). ‘The Sapphic “Umwertung aller Werte”’, American Journal of Philology 88: 434–42.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2000). The Athenian Institution of Khoregia. The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2009). ‘Tragic Honours and Democracy: Neglected Evidence for the Politics of the Athenian Dionysia’, Classical Quarterly 59, 8–29.Google Scholar
Wolff, F. (2000). L’être, l’homme, le disciple. Figures philosophiques empruntées à des Anciens. Paris.Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. (2002). Remembering Defeat: Civil War and Civic Memory in Ancient Athens. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. (2003). ‘Addresses to the Jury in the Attic Orators’, American Journal of Philology 124: 537–55.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2009). ‘Pleasure and Desire’, in Warren, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 158–78.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (1994). ‘History and Oratorical Exploitation’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric In Action. London and New York: 109–29.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. and Foley, J. M. (eds.) (2002). Epea and Grammata: Oral and Written. Communication in Ancient Greece. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (2000). ‘Politics as Literature: Demosthenes and the Burden of the Athenian Past’, Arion 8: 97–118.Google Scholar
Zadorojny, A. V. (1999). ‘Sappho and Plato in Plutarch, Demetrius 38’, in Pérez Jiménez, A., García López, J. and Aguilar, R. M. (eds.) Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles. Madrid: 515–32.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1995). ‘Art, Memory and kleos in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis’, in Goff, B. (ed.) History, Tragedy, Theory: Dialogues on Athenian Drama. Austin: 174–201.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2001). ‘Visions and Revisions of Homer’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.) Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge: 195–266.Google Scholar
Zellner, H. M. (2007). ‘Sappho’s Alleged Proof of Aesthetic Relativity’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 47: 257–70.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. (2006). ‘Aischylos-Rezeption im 5. Jahrhundert v. Chr.’, Lexis 24: 53–62.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, V. G. (2015). ‘The Wax Tablet in the Soul: From Metaphor to Model. Plato’s Theaetetus 191a5–196c9 in Light of 5th Century Metaphors of Memory’. MA thesis, Copenhagen.Google Scholar