We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 June 2019
INTRODUCTION
Globally, truth commissions, Often termed truth and reconciliation commissions, are popular options to deal with aspects of a country's violent past, despite the extensive criticisms levelled against them. Some claim that truth commissions are not the best choice. Call indicates that the major flaws of truth commission processes are that they Often serve as's econd best ‘mechanisms to judicial punishment. He argues that their reports are incomplete because in some cases only victims testify and because they lack funding. It has also been argued that truth commissions’ have recurrent, structural problems, ranging from limited resources to the politicization of the process to virtual impunity for a wide number of off enders’. However, Martha Minow has argued that truth commissions’ are not a second best alternative to prosecutions… When the societal goals include restoring dignity to victims, offering a basis for individual healing, and also promoting reconciliation across a divided nation, a truth commission may be as or more powerful than prosecutions.‘ It has also been said that truth commissions are no longer’ a political compromise [there has been a shift from them] being the “weaker alternative” to trials to a practice that is morally equal and complementary to the judicial option’. These institutions play pivotal roles in a number of respects, including truth recovery and aiding a society to repair the wounds that exist amongst victims and perpetrators and amongst divided groups. This view is not accepted universally and some have doubts about the roles these institutions play. However, the use and strength of truth commissions in regard to truth lies in creating complete records of human rights abuses, including the nature and extent of the crimes and the names and fates of the victims. While in some instances the reports issued by truth commissions include the identities of persons who gave the orders for human rights violations, as well as those who executed the orders, mostly such names have been omitted for political reasons. However, truth commissions can play a multitude of roles in addressing past human rights violations.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
