Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- 2 Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
- 3 The continuing challenge of discovering psychological ‘order’ across cultures
- 4 The ecocultural framework: a stocktaking
- 5 Frameworks for explaining cross-cultural variance: a meta-analytic examination of their usefulness
- 6 The relationship between individual and culture
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
2 - Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- 2 Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
- 3 The continuing challenge of discovering psychological ‘order’ across cultures
- 4 The ecocultural framework: a stocktaking
- 5 Frameworks for explaining cross-cultural variance: a meta-analytic examination of their usefulness
- 6 The relationship between individual and culture
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Why old history?
Apart from the fact that it is interesting, history in my opinion also has some lessons for us. Before the modern age of increasing specialisation, people from a rich variety of backgrounds were concerned with what we now call problems of culture. The list includes philosophers, travellers and explorers, missionaries, historians, mathematicians and so on. When posing questions and seeking for answers they learned from each other, which in a broad and rather ill-defined sphere like that of culture is still very important. Admittedly their views tended to be speculative, but they should not be dismissed on that account. They were arrived at by inferences from the imperfect information at their disposal, a problem that has by no means disappeared.
When empirical methods came to be developed, much earlier than is generally realised, there remained the issue of bridging the gap between the relatively limited facts ascertained and their wider ramifications. For instance, during the nineteenth century many scholars entered a blind alley when they attributed human differences to race, and were convinced that they had empirically demonstrated this by means of craniology. Can we be certain that some of our own efforts will not in future come to be regarded in a similarly disparaging manner? So history teaches us humility, as well as providing a wider perspective enabling us to see our own contributions in the context of a larger canvas.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology , pp. 37 - 63Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
- 10
- Cited by