Book contents
- Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
- Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: An Overview
- Part I On the Practical Implications of Free Will Skepticism
- Part II Alternatives to Retributive Punishment
- Part III Free Will Skepticism and the Criminal Justice System
- Chapter 8 Fichte and Psychopathy: Criminal Justice Turned Upside Down
- Chapter 9 Causality and Responsibility in Mentally Disordered Offenders
- Chapter 10 The Implications of Free Will Skepticism for Establishing Criminal Liability
- Chapter 11 Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Punishment: A Preliminary Ethical Analysis
- Index
- References
Chapter 9 - Causality and Responsibility in Mentally Disordered Offenders
from Part III - Free Will Skepticism and the Criminal Justice System
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 August 2019
- Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
- Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Chapter 1 Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: An Overview
- Part I On the Practical Implications of Free Will Skepticism
- Part II Alternatives to Retributive Punishment
- Part III Free Will Skepticism and the Criminal Justice System
- Chapter 8 Fichte and Psychopathy: Criminal Justice Turned Upside Down
- Chapter 9 Causality and Responsibility in Mentally Disordered Offenders
- Chapter 10 The Implications of Free Will Skepticism for Establishing Criminal Liability
- Chapter 11 Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Punishment: A Preliminary Ethical Analysis
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter is based on descriptions of three mentally disordered offenders. The first had a history of severe traumatization and the second suffered from a psychotic illness. They were both sent to prison and both committed suicide. The third suffered from Asperger syndrome and was sent to a secure psychiatric facility. I argue that the two deaths arose from a prescientific, retributive response to crime that was wholly inappropriate in these individuals. In the case of the trauma victim, the system responded by inflicting further trauma on her. The tragic outcome in the psychotic offender arose from the application of a legal definition of insanity that does not allow for complex clinical realities. I conclude that these cases point to a need to move from a retributive response to crime to one based on achieving the best outcomes for victims, offenders, and society. Legal concepts and definitions of insanity should be dropped. Instead, we should adopt an approach that is therapeutic rather than punitive in all cases where mental disorder has been a necessary causal factor in the commission of the offence.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Free Will Skepticism in Law and SocietyChallenging Retributive Justice, pp. 177 - 191Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019