Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:41:32.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

M. Patrick Cottrell
M. Patrick Cottrell
Affiliation:
Linfield College, Oregon
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Evolution and Legitimacy of International Security Institutions , pp. 217 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. Why States Act Through Formal Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3): 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan. 2012. Strengthening International Regulation Through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 42: 501–577.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan, and Zangl, Bernhard. 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Which Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2009. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The End of American World Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adelman, Kenneth. 1990. Why Verification Is More Difficult (and Less Important). International Security 14 (4): 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel. 1992. The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Arms Control. International Organization 46 (1): 101–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations (New International Relations). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel. 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post – Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel and Crawford, Beverly. 1991. Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel and Barnett, Michael N.. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel and Haas, Peter M.. 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46 (1): 3–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emmanuel and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. International Practices: Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society. International Organization 68 (1): 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexandroff, Alan S. and Cooper, Andrew F.. 2010. Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance. Baltimore, M.D.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2005. Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe. New York: Times Books/Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2010. Nuclear Disorder. Foreign Affairs 89 (1): 74–85.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar. 1985. Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam: The Use of the Atomic Bomb and the American Confrontation with Soviet Power. New York: Elisabeth Sifton.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar. 1995. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth. New York; Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E. 2005. International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford, England; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth. 2000. The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society. European Journal of International Law 11 (1): 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1910. The Great Illusion. New York; London: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1933. The Great Illusion. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi A. 2006. Non-Proliferation Treaty Facing Twin Crisis of Compliance, Confidence. Conference on Disarmament. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David J., Lloyd, Lorna, and Redmond, John. 1996. From Versailles to Maastricht: International Organisation in the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke; London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asif, Muhammad and Muneer, Tariq. 2007. Energy Supply, Its Demand, and Security Issues for Developed and Emerging Economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (7): 1388–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.). 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azcárate, Pablo de and Brooke, Eileen E. 1945. League of Nations and National Minorities: An Experiment. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Balme, Richard, and Chabanet, Didier. 2008. European Governance and Democracy: Power and Protest in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. 1997. “Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations.” World Politics 49 (4): 526–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. 2009. Evolution without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt. International Organization 63 (4): 621–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. 2011. Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. From International Relations to Global Society. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reau-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. 62–83. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Coleman, L.. 2005. “Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 49: 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha. 2005. The Power of Liberal International Organizations. In Power and Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., and Josling, Timothy E.. 2008. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and the Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and the Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, I.L.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bediner, Elmer. 1975. A Time for Angels: The Tragicomic History of the League of Nations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beetham, David J. 2001. The Legitimation of Power. Atlantic Heights, N.J.: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Beetham, David J. and Lord, Christopher. 1998. Legitimacy and the EU. Essex, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2006. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas. 1995. The Effect of International Environmental Institutions: How Do We Learn More. International Organization 49 (2): 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2002. Liberal Environmentalism and Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2004. The Elusive Basis of Legitimacy in Global Governance: Three Conceptions. Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition. Working Paper Series 2.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2011. Legitimacy in Intergovernmental and Non-state Global Governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Pauly, Louis W.. 2007. Global Liberalism and Political Order: Toward a New Grand Compromise? Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2004. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis and Representational Force. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blix, Hans. 2008. Why Nuclear Disarmament Matters. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2010. Packing Heat: Pro-Gun Groups as Global Governors in Small Arms Control. In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by D.D. Avant, M. Finnemore, and S.K. Sell. 83–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. 1999. The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law? The American Journal of International Law 93 (3): 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. 2014. Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited byDunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollock, Mark A.. 321–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boese, Wade. 2003. Countries Sticking to Timetable in Pledges on Eliminating Landmines. Arms Control Today 33 (8): 31.Google Scholar
Boese, Wade. 2005. Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Meeting Sputters. Arms Control Today 35 (6): 22.Google Scholar
Bohlen, Avis. 2003. The Rise and Fall of Arms Control. Survival 45 (3): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, John R. 2005. The NPT: A Crisis of Non-Compliance. Comparative Strategy 24 (1): 105.Google Scholar
Bolton, Matthew and Nash, Thomas. 2010. The Role of Middle Power-NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban: Middle Power-NGO Coalitions. Global Policy 1 (2): 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrie, John, Brehm, Maya, Cattaneo, Silvia, and Atwood, David. 2009. Learn, Adapt, Succeed: Potential Lessons from the Ottawa and Oslo Processes for Other Disarmament and Arms Control Challenges. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Ideas for Peace and Security. Geneva: UNIDIR.Google Scholar
Botcheva, Liliana and Martin, Lisa L.. 2001. Institutional Effects on State Behavior: Convergence and Divergence. International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, Adam. 2015. Norms Without the Great Powers: International Law, Nested Social Structures, and the Ban on Antipersonnel Mines. International Studies Review (Online Version of Record Published Before Inclusion in an Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, C. and Chyba, Christopher. 2004. Proliferation Rings: New Challenges to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. International Security 29 (2): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2013. Every Nation for Itself: What Happens When No One Leads the World. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Brown, Harold. 2007. “New Nuclear Realities.” Washington Quarterly 33 (1): 7–22.Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris. 2014. Minilateralism: How Trade Alliances, Soft Law and Financial Engineering are Redefining Economic Statecraft. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, Gro H. 2003. Global Insights: Global Health and International Security. Global Governance 9 (4): 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunee, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J.. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils. 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. Chichester; New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunsson, Nils. 2007. The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert O.. 2006. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley, O'Neill, Robert John, and Schwartz, David N.. 1987. Hedley Bull on Arms Control. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bunn, George. 2003. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: History and Current Problems. Arms Control Today 33 (10): 4–10.Google Scholar
Bunn, George and Rhinelander, John B.. 2007. Reykjavik Revisited: Toward a World Free of Nuclear Weapons. Washington, D.C.: World Security Institute.Google Scholar
Burns, E. L. M. 1969. The Nonproliferation Treaty: Its Negotiation and Prospects. International Organization 23 (4): 788–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim. 2002. Taking Temporality Seriously. American Political Science Review 9 (3): 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Richard. 2001. Fatal Choice: Nuclear Weapons and the Illusion of Missile Defense. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Butler, Richard. 2003. Improving Nonproliferation Enforcement. Washington Quarterly 26 (4): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Richard. 2004. The Lessons and Legacy of UNSCOM. Arms Control Today 34 (5): 4.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Hansen, Lene. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, C.O.: Lynn Rienner Publications.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. 1998. Democratization of Foreign Policy: The Ottawa Process as a Model. Canadian Foreign Policy 5 (3): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 1998. To Walk without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines. Toronto; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Craig and Radchenko, Sergey. 2008. The Atomic Bomb and the Origins of the Cold War. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kurt M., Einhorn, Robert J., and Reiss, Mitchell. 2004. The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider their Nuclear Choices. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Canales, Jimena. Dec, 2005. Einstein, Bergson, and the Experiment That Failed: Intellectual Cooperation at the League of Nations. MLN 120 (5): 1168–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, G. R. and Keleman, Danial. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics 59 (3): 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Simmons, Beth A., and Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 2002. Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, David D. 1993. The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council. The American Journal of International Law 87 (4): 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. Jul–Aug 2008. A League of Their Own. Foreign Policy. 167: 44–49.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2007. Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks. International Organization 51 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2011. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization 65 (1): 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward H. 1939 (repr. 2001). The Twenty Years Crisis: 1919–1939. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward H. 1962. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939; An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London; New York: Macmillan; St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Carranza, Mario E. 2006. Can the NPT Survive? The Theory and Practice of US Nuclear Non-Proliferation Policy after Sept. 11. Contemporary Security Policy 27 (3): 489–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey-Maslen, Stuart. Sep, 1997. Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and Their Destruction. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law.Google Scholar
Chabasse, Philippe. 1998. “The French Campaign,” In To Walk without Fear, edited byCameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 60–68. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Glenn. 1995. The Political Psychology of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. The Journal of Politics 57 (3): 743–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia H.. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2): 175–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia H.. 1998. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1997. Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behavior and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50 (2): 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3): 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, Julia. 2006. Problems of Enforcement: Iran, North Korea, and the NPT. Harvard International Review 28 (2): 38.Google Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph. 2007. Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph, Wolfsthal, Jon B., and Miriam, Rajkumar. 2005. Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2003. Legitimacy in a Global Order. Review of International Studies 29 (Supplement): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2007a. International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2007b. Setting the Revisionist Agenda for International Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2/3): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian and Reus-Smit, Christian. 2007. Preface. International Politics 44 (2/3): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claude, Inis L. 1966. Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations. International Organization 20 (3): 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claude, Inis L. 1971. Swords into Plowshares; The Problems and Progress of International Organization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Clavin, Patricia. 2013. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavin, Patricia and Wessels, Jens-Wilhelm. 2005. Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of its Economic and Financial Organisation. Contemporary European History 14 (4): 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Roger. 2010. Dangerous Nuclear Illusions. New York Times, November 11.Google Scholar
Coicaud, Jean M. and Heiskanen, Veijo A.. 2001. The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Tokyo; New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Keohane, Robert O., and Van de Graaf, Thijs. 2012. Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex. Review of International Organizations 7 (2): 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. Understanding Process Tracing. Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 823–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Andrew, Heine, Jorge, and Thakur, Ramesh (eds.). 2013. Introduction: The Challenges of 21st Century Diplomacy. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. 2009. Woodrow Wilson: A Biography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. 2010. Breaking the Heart of the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 2012. The American Experience. (Transcription). www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/wilson/filmmore/pt.html. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P. and Davis, James W. 1996. How do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortright, David. 2008. Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick. 2009. Legitimacy and Institutional Replacement: The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and the Emergence of the Mine Ban Treaty. International Organization 63 (2): 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick. 2011. Hope or Hype? Legitimacy and U.S. Foreign Policy in a Global Age. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (3): 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick. 2014. Lost in Transition? The League of Nations and the United Nations. In Charter of the United Nations: Together with Scholarly Commentaries and Essential Historical Documents, edited by Lampert, Joseph and Shapiro, Ian. 91–106. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick and Trubek, David M.. 2012. Law as Problem Solving: Standards, Networks, Experimentation, and Deliberation in Global Space. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 21: 358–393.Google Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick and Nelson, Travis. 2015. Sport without Referees? The Power of the International Olympic Committee and the Social Politics of Accountability. European Journal of International Relations 17 (4): 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, M. Patrick, Nance, Mark, and Trubek, David. 2005. Hard and Soft Law in European Integration. In New Governance and Constitutionalism, edited by de Búrca, Graínne and Scott, Joanne. 65–94. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Cox, Richard. 2008. The Point is not Just to Explain the World but to Change It. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1992. Multilateralism and World Order. Review of International Order 18 (2): 161–180Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2006. How Previous Ideas Affect Later Ideas. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Tilly, Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croll, Mike. 1998. The History of Landmines. Barnsley: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce. 1999. Community Under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce. 2003. Institutions for the Common Good: International Protection Regimes in International Society. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Bruce and Hurd, Ian. 2008. The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czempiel, Ernst O. and Rosenau, James N.. 1989. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Lexington, M.A.: Lexington Books Czempiel, E.O.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo and Lodal, Jan. 2008. The Logic of Zero – Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons. Foreign Affairs 87 (6): 80–95.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1970. Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1999. Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View. In Democracy's Edges, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, David. 2003. The New Diplomacy. Policy Review 11 (6): 17.Google Scholar
Davis, Julian. 2004. The Campaign to Ban Landmines: Public Diplomacy, Middle Power Leadership and an Unconventional Negotiating Process. The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance: Field Experience and Current Research on Humanitarian Action and Policy. https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/836. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Davis, Zachary S. 1993. The Realist Nuclear Regime. Security Studies 2 (3/4): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Zachary S. and Frankel, Benjamin. 1993. The Proliferation Puzzle: Why Nuclear Weapons Spread and What Results. London, England; Portland, O.R.: F. Cass.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Graínne, Keohane, Robert O., and Sabel, Charles. 2014. Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Búrca, Graínne and Scott, Joanne. 2006a. Law and the New Governance in the EU and the US. Portland, O.R.: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Graínne and Scott, Joanne. 2006b. New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism. In Law and New Governance in the EU and US, edited by de Búrca, and Scott, . 1–13. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. 1835. Democracy in America. London: Saunders and Otley.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2007. The Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives. Boulder, C.O.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney G.. 2005. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, M.D.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Deller, Nicole, Makhijani, Arjun, and Burroughs, John. 2003. Rule of Power Or Rule of Law?: An Assessment of U.S. Policies and Actions regarding Security-Related Treaties. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, G. John. 1999. The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies 25 (2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha. 2015. The 2015 Review Conference for the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: A Review or a Requiem? Global Governance 21 (1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha and Rydell, Randy. 2005. Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider's Account. Geneva, Switzerland: UNIDIR.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Michael. 2012. Nuclear Energy: Status and Future Limitations. Energy: 7th Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Michael and Hunt, Chris. 1998. Negotiating in the Ottawa Process: The New Multilateralism. In To Walk Without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W. 2000. Constructing Effective Environmental Regimes. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W. and Rocke, David. 1990. Tacit Bargaining, Arms Races, and Arms Control. Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W. and Rocke, David. 1995. Optimal Imperfection?: Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David, and Barsoom, Peter. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David, and Barsoom, Peter. 1998. Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. International Organization 52 (2): 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, James E. 2013. Why Eliminate Nuclear Weapons? Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 55 (1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3): 205–235, 323–353.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael and Luck, Edward C.. 2004. International Law and Organization: Closing the Compliance Gap. Lanham, M.D.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Drell, , Sidney, D. and Schultz, George P.. 2007. Implications of the Reykjavik Summit on its Twentieth Anniversary: Conference Report. Palo Alto, C.A.: Hoover Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2014. The System Worked: How the World Stopped Another Great Depression. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B., and Schlosberg, David. 2011. Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Sergio. 2006. Keeping the NPT Together: A Thankless Job in a Climate of Mistrust. Nonproliferation Review 13 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S. 1994. NATO's Functions After the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly 109 (5): 763–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, Mark. 1994. Complex Energies and the Crisis of Developmentalism. Institute of Development Studies. IDS Bulletin 25 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, J. P. D. 1993. International Relations Since 1945: A History in Two Volumes. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 1995. High Noon for the NPT. Arms Control Today 25 (6).Google Scholar
Dunn, Lynne. 1997. Keeping the covenant: American Internationalists and the League of Nations, 1920–1939. Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A.. 2013. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn. 2007. Ambushed: The Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2/3): 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, Lynn. 2004. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Robert J., Flournoy, Michèle A., and Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2003. Protecting Against the Spread of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons: An Action Agenda for the Global Partnership. Washington, D.C.: CSIS Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Charles H. 1929. The Origin, Structure and Working of the League of Nations. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Emmerij, Louis, Jolly, Richard, and Weiss, Thomas G.. 2001. Ahead of the Curve? UN Ideas and Global Challenges. Bloomington, I.N.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, William. 1975. Nuclear Proliferation: The Failure of the Review Conference. Survival 17 (6): 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, William. 1976. The Last Chance: Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel. 2002. The World Trade Organization's Legitimacy Crisis. World Trade Review 1 (1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 2003. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1964. The Role of Domestic Courts in the International Legal Order. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1977. Nuclear Weapons Proliferation as a World Order Problem. International Security 1 (3): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, Stephan. 2007. The Real Roots of Darfur. The Atlantic Monthly 299 (3): 67.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry and Newman, Abraham L.. 2010. Introduction: Making Global Markets – Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 609–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2): 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, Beth A., and Risse-Kappen, Thomas. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fearon, James and Laitin, David. 2003. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles D. 2010. The Long Road to Zero. Foreign affairs 89 (1): 86.Google Scholar
Fields, Jeffrey and Enia, Jason S.. The Health of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime: Returning to a Multidimensional Evaluation. Nonproliferation Review 16 (2): 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, Trevor. 1999. Verification of the Ottawa Convention: Workable Hybrid or Fatal Compromise? Framework for a Mine-Free World, Disarmament Forum, Acadia University, Disarmament Forum 4: 45–55.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Lawrence. 2005. From Seeds to System: The UN Charter. UN Chronicle, March.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy. International Organization 47 (4): 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996a. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996b. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2005. Fights about Rules: The Role of Efficacy and Power in Changing Multilateralism. Review of International Studies 31, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All It's Cracked Up to be. World Politics 61 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 55 (3): 887–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Toope, Stephen J.. 2001. Alternatives to “Legalization: Richer Views of Law and Politics. International Organization 55 (3): 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2011. Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization 65 (2): 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Roger. 1981. Improving Compliance with International Law. Charlottesville, V.A.: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann, Kokusai, Nihon Sentā, Kōryū, and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange; Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Brookings Institution Press distributor.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory and Farrell, Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post-Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3): 505–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster, Schuyler. 2002. The Changing International Context. In Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment, edited by Larsen, Jeffrey. Boulder, C.O.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada. 2008. Ottawa Convention Links and Documents. Updated July 18, 2008.Google Scholar
Fosdick, Raymond B. 1972. The League and the United Nations After 50 Years; the Six Secretary Generals. Newton, C.T.: Raymond B. Fosdick.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas. 1995. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2012a. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2012b. Splitting Atoms: Why do Countries Build Nuclear Power Plants? International Interactions 38 (1): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, Robert. 1998. The Military Utility of Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk Without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garsten, Christina and Jacobsson, Kerstin. 2004. Learning to be Employable: An Introduction in Learning to be Employable: New Agendas on Work, Responsibility and Learning in a Globalizing World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2005. Blasts from the Past: Proliferation Lessons from the 1960s. International Security 29 (3): 100–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2010. Same as it Ever was: Nuclear Alarmism, Proliferation, and the Cold War. International Security 34 (3): 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2012. Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America's Atomic Age. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher. 2003. The Power of Legitimacy: Assessing the Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, M.A.; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra. 2005. Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”. International Organization 59 (4): 97–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 2015. Critical Perspectives on the Crisis of Global Governance: Reimagining the Future. London; England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, A. and Goldston, R.. 2012. Proliferation Risks of Fusion Energy: Clandestine Production, Covert Production, and Breakout. Nuclear Fusion 52 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennon, Michael J. 2005. How International Rules Die. Georgetown Law Journal 93 (3): 939–991.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goldin, Ian. 2013. Divided Nations: Why Global Governance Is Failing and What We Can Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 1999. The IAEA Safeguards System Moves into the 21st Century. IAEA.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2011. Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds). 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodby, James. 2006. Looking Back: The 1986 Reykjavik Summit. Arms Control Today 36 (7): 49Google Scholar
Goodrich, Leland. 1947. From League of Nations to United Nations. International Organization 1 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Leland M. and Simons, Anne P.. 1955. The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gordin, Michael. 2007. Five Days in August: How World War II Became a Nuclear War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gore, Al. 2007. Moving Beyond Kyoto. New York Times, July 1.Google Scholar
Graham, Bob. 2011. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: A Crisis of Confidence. International Law and Policy Review 1 (2): 147–174.Google Scholar
Graham, Thomas. 2004. Common Sense on Weapons of Mass Destruction. Seattle; Washington, D.C.: University of Washington Press; in association with the Eisenhower Institute.Google Scholar
Grand, Camille. 2010. The Non-Proliferation Treaty in an Era of Proliferation Crises. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. The American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, Morris. 1959. The Modern Law of Land Warfare. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2005. Mapping the UN-League of Nations Analogy: Are there Still Lessons to be Learned from the League? Global Governance 11: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo and Kelsey, Francis W.. 1957. Prolegomena to the Law of War and Peace. Indianapolis, I.N.: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley, C.A.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. and Haas, Ernst B.. 1995. Learning to Learn: Improving International Governance. Global Governance 1 (3): 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O., and Levy, Marc A.. 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert O., and Wallander, Celeste A.. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions Over Time and Space. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Thomas, Held, David, and Young, Kevin. 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need it Most. Malden, M.A.: Polity.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2009. Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective. In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 204–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary. 1996. Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44: 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine. 2015. International Organization in Time: Fragmentation and Reform. Oxford; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Marianne. 2005. The Future of the NPT. Australian Journal of International Affairs 59 (3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Selig S. 2006. The Forgotten Bargain: Nonproliferation and Nuclear Disarmament. World Policy Journal 23 (3): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1996. Justice, Equality, and the Robustness of International Regimes: A Research Design. Tübingen [Germany]: Abteilung Internationale Beziehungen/Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Universität.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Vol. 55. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P.. 2004. Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J.. 2006. Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations, and Principal-Agent Theory. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel, and Tierney, Michael. 3–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David and McGrew, Anthony G. 2000. The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge; Malden, M.A.: Polity Press; Blackwell.Google Scholar
Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2005. Global Governance and Public Accountability. Malden, M.A.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. 2014. Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Gunther. 2003. Forum: Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations. International Studies Review 5: 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. and Visser, J.. 2003. Policy Learning in European Welfare States. Unpublished manuscript: Universities of Leyden and Amsterdam, October.Google Scholar
Henig, Ruth B. 1973. The League of Nations. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Henig, Ruth B. 2010a. The League of Nations: The Makers of the Modern World. New York: Haus Publishing.Google Scholar
Henig, Ruth B. 2010b. The League of Nations: The Peace Conferences of 1919–23 and Their Aftermath. London: Haus Pub. Ltd.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1999. Kosovo and the Law of ‘Humanitarian Intervention.’ American Journal of International Law (93): 824–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilderbrand, Robert. 1990. Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, Robert. 2001. Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. and American Council of Learned Societies. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hodson, Dermot and Maher, Imelda. 2004. Soft Law and Sanctions: Economic Policy Coordination and Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (5): 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, David. 1994. Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939–1956. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. New York: Cambridge University press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1992. International Politics: A Framework for Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1994. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homer-Dixon, Thomas. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoopes, Townsen and Brinkley, Douglas. 1997. FDR and the Creation of the U.N. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Horovitz, Liviu. 2015. Beyond Pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Will Not Collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies 38 (1–2): 126–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housden, Martyn. 2011. The League of Nations and the Organization of Peace. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O. 1933. The Verdict of the League; China and Japan in Manchuria. Boston: World Peace Foundation.Google Scholar
Hulme, David. 2010. Global Poverty: How Global Governance is Failing the Poor (Global Institutions). New York, N.Y.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, and Physicians for Human Rights. 1993. Landmines: A Deadly Legacy. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2): 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2002. Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council. Global Governance 8 (1): 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007a. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power at the United Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007b. Breaking and Making Norms: American Revisionism and Crises of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2/3): 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2005. “Power, Institutions, and the Production of Inequality.” In Power and Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael N. and Duvall, Raymond. 33–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2006. Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can the Circle Be Squared? Review of International Studies 31: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitutions of International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. 2006a. Theories of Nuclear Proliferation: The State of the Field. The Non-Proliferation Review 13 (3): 455–465.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. 2006b. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. 2012. Achieving Nuclear Ambitions: Scientists, Politicians, and Proliferation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifft, Edward. 2005. Witness for the Prosecution: International Organizations and Arms Control Verification. Arms Control Today 35 (9): 12.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1988. Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy. In The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, edited by Ikenberry, John G., Lake, David A., and Mastanduno, Michael. 219–247. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009a. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009b. The Crisis of American Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (ed.). 2014. Power, Order, and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. and Kupchan, Charles A.. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3): 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikle, Fred. 1961. After Detection…What? Foreign Affairs 1 (1): 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2004a. Fact Sheet: Tools for Nuclear Inspection.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2004b. Fact Sheet: What is the IAEA?Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2004c. Fact Sheet: IAEA Safeguards: Stemming the Spread of Nuclear Weapons.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014. Nuclear Safety and Security. Incident and Trafficking Database (ITDB).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1956. Draft Rules for the Limitation of the Dangers Incurred by the Civilian Population in Time of War. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1992. A Perverse Use of Technology: Mines. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1994. Landmines, Time for Action: International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 1996. Anti-Personnel Landmines: Friend or Foe?: A Study of the Military use and Effectiveness of Anti-Personnel Mines. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2006. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, Harold and Weiss, Edith B.. 1995. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Global Governance 1 (2): 119–148.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Kirsten. 2004. Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy. Journal of European Social Policy 14 (4): 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Hans-Martin. 2008. ‘World Opinion' and the Founding of the UN: Governmentalizing International Politics. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentleson, Bruce W. 1992. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma World Politics. World Politics 30 (2): 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1983. Security Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1989. The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1998. Realism in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4): 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Nau, Henry, and Schweller, Randall L.. 2002. Correspondence: Institutionalized Disagreement. International Security 27 (1): 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, Josef. 2006. Überpower: The Imperial Temptation of America. 1st edn. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca. 2005a. All Talk, No Action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 61 (4): 19.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca. 2005b. Politics and Protection: Why the 2005 NPT Review Conference Failed. Disarmament Diplomacy 80 (Autumn): 3–19.Google Scholar
Johnson, Tara. 2014. Organizational Progeny: Why Governments are Losing Control Over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair I. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Andrew. 2009. Dilemmas of Internationalism: The American Association for the United Nations and US Foreign Policy, 1941–1948. Burlington, V.T.: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian. 2005. The Power of Interpretive Communities. In Power in Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael N. and Duvall, Raymond. 185. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian. 2011. The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics, and Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, Richard, Emmerij, Louis, and Weiss, Thomas G.. 2009. UN Ideas that Changed the World. Bloomington, I.N.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Joskow, Paul L. and Parsons, John E.. 2012. The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima. MIT CEEPR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, J., Mattli, W., and Snidal, D. 2013. Institutional Choice in Global Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2004. America's Crisis of Legitimacy. Foreign Affairs 83 (2): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles (ed.). 2009. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Ithaca, N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A.. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kan, Naoto. 2012. Former Japanese PM Naoto Kan on the Fukushima Disaster: A Changing View of Nuclear Power. Foreign Affairs. Accessed at www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2012-03-08/former-japanese-pm-naoto-kan-fukushima-disaster on December 27, 2015.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1939. Perpetual Peace. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, Ethan. 2005. Power, Fairness, and the Global Economy. In Power in Global Governance, edited by Barnett, Michael N. and Duvall, Raymond. 80. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. and Okawara, Nobuo. 2001. Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security 26 (3): 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. and Sil, Rudra. 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1999. Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.). 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008. Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring. International Organization 62 (2): 221–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, Antonio Gramsci, and the Legal System. 1982. 6 ALSA Forum, No. 1, p. 32.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 2006. The Parliament of Man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2001. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 2000. The American Political Science Review 95 (1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2005. Abuse of Power. Harvard International Review 27 (2): 48.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2008. Big Questions in the Study of World Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. 708–716. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Wallender, Celeste A.. 1999. Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, edited by Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert O., and Wallender, Celeste. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2010. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Discussion Paper 2010–33, Cambridge, M.A.: The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, January.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 2001. The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy. In Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, edited by Porter, Roger B., Sauve, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind, and Zampetti, Americo Beviglia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Macedo, Stephen, and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2009. Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. International Organization 63 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Paul. 2003. Intelligence Chiefs Paint Grim Picture of Proliferation. Arms Control Today 33 (2): 19.Google Scholar
Kessler, Christian J. 1995. Verifying Nonproliferation Treaties: Obligation, Process, and Sovereignty. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1919. The Economic Consequences of Peace. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Khanna, Parag. 2008. The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939, History of the World Economy in the Twentieth Century, v. 4. Berkeley, C.A.: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1981. Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy – Exploitation, Public-Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1998. The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law. Michigan Journal of International Law 19 (2): 345–372.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1957. A World Restored; Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1973. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Vol. 79. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Kittrie, Nicholas N. 1995. The War Against Authority: From the Crisis of Legitimacy to a New Social Contract. Baltimore, M.D.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kittrie, Nicholas N. 2000. Rebels with a Cause: The Minds and Morality of Political Offenders. Boulder, C.O.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. 2002. Introduction to International Institutional Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. 2009. An Introduction to International Institutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995a. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995b. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization 49 (3): 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia. 2007. Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk; New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kmentt, Alexander. 2013. How Divergent Views on Nuclear Disarmament Threaten the NPT. Arms Control Today 43 (10): 8–13.Google Scholar
Knepper, Paul. 2011. International Crime in the 20th Century: The League of Nations Era 1919–1939. Basingstoke, England; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knock, Thomas. 1992. To End all Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knock, Thomas. 2009. “Playing for 100 Years Hence,” In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy, edited by Ikenberry, John G.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W. 1998. Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on US Arms Control Policy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W. 2012. Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation: Examining the Linkage Argument. International Security 37 (3): 92–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 109: 25–99.Google Scholar
Koppell, Jonathan G. S. 2010. World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy, and the Design of Global Governance. Chicago, I.L.: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2004. Rational Design: Explaining the Form of International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001a. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4): 761–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, Snidal, Duncan, and Kydd, Andrew. 2001b. The Rational Design of International Institutions. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kovacs, Peter. 2013. The Protection of Minorities Under the Auspices of the League of Nations. In The Oxford Handbook on International Human Rights Law, edited by Shelton, Dinah. 325–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmann, Elke. 2003. Conceptualizing Security Governance. Cooperation and Conflict 38 (1): 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, , Friedrich, V. and Ruggie, John G.. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4): 753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R. and Jackson, Patrick T.. 2007. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13 (35): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 2012. No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. and Kupchan, Clifford A.. 1995. The Promise of Collective Security. International Security 20 (1): 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A., Davidson, Jason, and Sucharov, Mira. 2001. Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order. Tokyo; New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2001. Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions. International Security 26 (1): 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2011. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew and Scott, Joanne. 2009. The Hidden World of WTO Governance. European Journal of International Law 20 (3): 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2006. Nuclear Hearts and Minds. International Studies Review 8 (4): 650–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2011. Irrational Exuberance?: The 2012 NPT Review Conference, Nuclear Assistance, and Norm Change. The Nonproliferation Review 18 (2): 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Robert J., Gwozdecky, Mark, Sinclair, Jill, and Lysyshyn, Ralph. 1998. The Ottawa Process and the International Movement to Ban Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 160–185. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey. 2002. Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment. Boulder, C.O.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 1995. Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint during World War II. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 1997. Which Norms Matter? International Organization 51 (1): 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 2005. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 2007. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2): 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change. The American Political Science Review 96 (4): 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1993. The Phantom Public. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 1998. From Local Knowledge and Practice to Global Environmental Governance. In Approaches to Global Governance Theory, edited by Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy J.. 259–283. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man; The Social Bases of Politics. 1st edn. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1991. Why are some International Agreements Informal? International Organization 45 (4): 495–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Michael. 2007. Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Henry Cabot. 1918. League of Nations. Nation's Forum.Google Scholar
Luck, Edward C. 1999. Mixed Messages: American Politics and International Organization 1919–1999. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Luck, Edward C. 2002. The United States, International Organizations, and the Quest for Legitimacy. In Multilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, edited by Patrick, Stewart and Forman, Shepard. 47–75. Boulder, C.O.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Colum. 2014. They Just Stood Watching. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/04/07/they-just-stood-watching-2/. Accessed July 19, 2014.Google Scholar
Macmillan, Margaret. 2002. Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001. Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael. 2002. The Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael. 2005. The Case for Goliath: How America Acts as the World's Government in the Twenty-First Century. 1st edn. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4): 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. 2006. Elaborating the New Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, Sarah, and Lockman, Bert. 3–23. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maresca, Louis, Maslen, Stuart, and International Committee of the Red Cross. 2000. The Banning of Anti-Personnel Landmines: The Legal Contribution of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Interests, Power, and Multilateralism. International Organization 46: 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. and Simmons, Beth A.. 2002. International Organizations and Institutions. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A.. 192–212. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1852 (1979). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels Collected Works. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Maslen, Stuart. 1998. The Role of the International Committee of the Red Cross. In To Walk Without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell, Lawson, Robert, and Tomlin, Brian. 80–99. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maslen, Stuart and Lloyd, Richard. 2004. Mine Action After Diana: Progress in the Struggle Against Landmines. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Matheson, Michael J. 1997. The Revision of the Mines Protocol. The American Journal of International Law 91 (1): 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, Richard A., McDonald, Bryan, and Rutherford, Ken. 2004. Landmines and Human Security: International Politics and War's Hidden Legacy. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Mathews, Robert J. 2001. The 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons: A Useful Framework Despite Earlier Disappointments. International Review of the Red Cross 83 (844): 991–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2009. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea, 1815 to the Present. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2008. Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, John. 2009. U.S. Senate Floor Speech, Washington, D.C., June 3.Google Scholar
McCalla, Robert B. 1996. NATO's Persistence after the Cold War. International Organization 50 (3): 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Helen. 2011. The British People and the League of Nations. Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Matt. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Robert S. 2005. Apocalypse Soon. Foreign Policy (148): 28.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1990. Back to the Future. International Security 15 (1): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2001. Tragedy of Great Power. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, Boli, John, and Thomas, George. 1997. World Society and the Nation State. American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Paul. 2009. Saving the NPT: Time to Renew Treaty Commitments. Nonproliferation Review 16 (3): 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mian, Zia. 2004. The American Problem: The United States and Noncompliance in the World of Arms Control and Nonproliferation. In International Law and Organization: Closing the Compliance Gap, edited by Luck, Edward C. and Doyle, Michael W.. 247–302. New York: Rowan & Littlefield Pub Inc.Google Scholar
Michalak, Stanley J. Dec, 1971. The League of Nations and the United Nations in World Politics: A Plea for Comparative Research on Universal International Organizations. International Studies Quarterly 15 (4): 387–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Steven and Sagan, Scott D.. 2009. Nuclear Power Without Nuclear Proliferation? Dædalus (Fall): 7–18.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres. The American Political Science Review 99 (3): 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2013. Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origin of Global Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, Lydia and Gallimore, Andrew. 2002. The Devil's Gardens: A History of Landmines. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H. 2005. Ringing in Proliferation: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network. International Security 30 (2): 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Rebecca R. 2007. NATO's New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post-Cold War World. Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations; The Struggle for Power and Peace. 1st edn. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information. International Organization 48 (3): 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Julia C. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2014. Contested Multilateralism. The Review of International Organization 23 (1).Google Scholar
Mosher, James S. and Trubek, David M.. 2003. Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1): 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John. 2009. Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al Qaeda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Harald. 2000. Compliance Politics: A Critical Analysis of Multilateral Arms Control Treaty Enforcement. The Nonproliferation Review 7 (2): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Harald. 2005a. A Treaty in Troubled Waters: Reflections on the Failed NPT Review Conference. The International Spectator 40 (3): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Harald. 2005b. The 2005 NPT Review Conference: Reasons and Consequences of Failure. WMD Commission Report (Working Paper 31): 1–21.Google Scholar
Muller, Harald. 2010. Between Power and Justice: Current Problems and Perspectives of the NPT Regime. Strategic Analysis 34 (2): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Shane P. 2002. The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Political Studies 50 (4): 883.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Shane P. 2005. The Uses of Legitimacy in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (2): 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhatzhanova, Guakhar. 2014. Rough Seas Ahead: Issues for the 2015 NPT Review Conference. Arms Control Today 44 (3): 20–26.Google Scholar
Murithi, Tim. Dec 2003. Rethinking the United Nations System: Prospects for a World Federation of Nations. International Journal on World Peace 20 (4): 3–28.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Patrick R. 1993. Succession between International Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Myers, Robert J. 1987. International Ethics in the Nuclear Age. Lanham, M.D.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva. 1982. The Game of Disarmament. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nance, Mark T. and Cottrell, M. Patrick. 2014. A Turn Toward Experimentalism? Re-thinking Security and Governance in the 21st Century. Review of International Studies 40 (2): 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David. 1992. Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Security Archive. 2000. U.S. Nuclear Non-proliferation Policy, 1945–1991. Washington, D.C.; Alexandria, V.A.: National Security Archive; Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. and May, Ernest R.. 1986. Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers. London; New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Edward. 2007. A Crisis of Global Institutions?: Multilateralism and International Security. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Edward, Thakur, Ramesh, and Tirman, John. 2006. Multilateralism Under Challenge?: Power, Normative Structure, and World Order. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L. and Tierney, Michael J.. 2003. Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization 57 (2): 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemayer, Gerhard. 1952. The Balance Sheet of the League Experiment. International Organization 6 (4): 537–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Janne E., Finel, Bernard I., and Finlay, Brian D. 2003. Ultimate Security: Combatting Weapons of Mass Destruction. New York: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 2015. A New Solution: The Climate Club. The New York Review of Books 62 (10): 36–39.Google Scholar
North, Douglass A. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. 1st edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Northedge, F. S. 1986. The League of Nations, Its Life and Times 1920–1946. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Nurkse, Ragnar. 1944. International Currency Experience: Lessons of the Interwar Period. League of Nations. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 1985. NPT: The Logic of Inequality. Foreign Policy 59: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 1987. Nuclear Learning and U.S.-Soviet Security Regimes. International Organization 41 (3): 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. 1st edn. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2005. Power in the Global Information Age: From Realism to Globalization. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2007. Renewing American Leadership. Foreign Affairs 86 (4): 2–16.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009. Speech, Prague, Czech Republic, April 5.Google Scholar
Ogilvie-White, T. 1996. Is There a Theory of Nuclear Proliferation? An Analysis of the Contemporary Debate. The Nonproliferation Review 4 (1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie-White, T. and Santoro, David. 2012. Slaying the Nuclear Dragon: Disarmament Dynamics in the Twentieth Century. Athens, G.A.: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action; Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Katie. 2004. Transnational Protest: States, Circuses, and Conflict at the Frontline of Global Politics. International Studies Review 6 (2): 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. G. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrower, Gary B. 1919. League of Nations. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth. A. 1985. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Panke, D. and Petersohn, U.. 2011. Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 7Si19–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Roland. 2001. Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security 26 (2): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. 2008. The Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. 2014. The Unruled World: The Case for Good Enough Global Governance. Foreign Affairs 93 (1): 58–73.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart and Forman, Shepard. 2002. Multilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement. Boulder, C.O.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2000. Power Versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons. Montreal: McGill Queens University.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2003. Systemic Conditions and Security Cooperation: Explaining the Persistence of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime 1. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 16 (1): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2010. Taboo or Tradition? The Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons in World Politics. Review of International Studies 36 (4): 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C.. 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., Harknett, Richard J., and Wirtz, James J.. 1998. The Absolute Weapon Revisited: Nuclear Arms and the Emerging International Order. Ann Arbor, M.I.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., Teleglobe Raoul-Dandurand Chair of Strategic and Diplomatic Studies, and Universitédu Québec à Montréal. Centre d'études des politiques étrangères et de sécurité. 2000. Power Versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis. 1996. The League of Nations and the Foreshadowing of the IMF. In Essays in International Finance, International Finance Section Princeton University, no. 201.Google Scholar
Pauly, Louis. 2007. The United Nations in a Changing Global Economy. In Global Liberalism and Political Order, edited by Bernstein, Steven and Pauly, Louis. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 2001. Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Susan. 2007. Back to the League of Nations. The American Historical Review 112 (4): 1091–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, George. 2006. The End of the Nonproliferation Regime? Current History 105 (694): 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, George and Acton, James M.. 2009. Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: A Debate. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, Ann. 1996. Landmines in the 21st Century. International Relations 13 (2): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (June): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilat, Joseph F. 2007. The End of the NPT Regime? International Affairs 83 (3): 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilat, Joseph F. and Pendley, Robert E. 1995. 1995, A New Beginning for the NPT? New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plesch, Dan. 2011. America, Hitler and the UN: How the Allies Won World War II and Forged Peace. London; New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51 (1): 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, Roland. 2014. Introduction: Global Order, Cooperation between the Superpowers, and Alliance Politics in the Making of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. The International History Review 36 (2): 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Bill. 2006. The Kim Conundrum. Time 168 (3): 30.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, I.L.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Preez, Jean. 2006. Half Full Or Half Empty? Realizing the Promise of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Arms Control Today 36 (10): 6.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1995. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization 49 (1): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3): 613–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 2003. Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics. World Politics 55 (4): 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 2007. Nuclear Weapons Don't Kill People, Rogues do. International Politics 44 (2/3): 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 2008. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quester, George H. 1970. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency. International Organization 24 (2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauf, Tariq and Johnson, Rebecca. 1995. After the NPT's Indefinite Extension: The Future of the Global Nonproliferation. Nonproliferation Review 3 (1): 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2002. International Law, International Relations, and Compliance. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, Beth A., and Risse-Kappen, Thomas. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. 1988. Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. 1995. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Baltimore, M.D.: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2003. Politics and International Legal Obligation. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 591–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2004. The Politics of International Law. Vol. 96. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2007. International Crises of Legitimacy. International Politics 44 (2/3): 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2009. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 1986. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 1995. Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 2008. Arsenals of Folly: The Making of the Nuclear Arms Race. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 2010. The Twilight of the Bombs: Recent Challenges, New Dangers, and the Prospects for a World without Nuclear Weapons. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Vol. 42. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 2002. Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversations Across Paradigms. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, I. and Milner, H.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Brad. 2000. The Road Ahead for Arms Control. Washington Quarterly 23 (2): 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Brad. 2001. Revisiting Fred Ikle's 1961 Question, ‘After Detection–what?’ The Nonproliferation Review 8 (1): 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robock, Alan and Toon, Owen Brian. 2012. Self-Assured Destruction: The Climate Impacts of Nuclear War. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (5): 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 2013. The Resurgence of the West: How a Transatlantic Union Can Prevent War and Restore the United States and Europe. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst O.. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, Robert. 2004. When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rublee, Maria R. 2009. Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint. Athens, G.A.: University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1992. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization 46 (3): 561–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1994. Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism after the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly 109 (4): 553–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1995. The False Premise of Realism. International Security 20 (1): 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1997. The Past as Prologue?: Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy. International Security 21 (4): 89–125.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1998a. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1998b. What Makes the World Hang Together. International Organization 52 (3): 855–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruotsila, Markku. 2007. Origins of Christian Anti-Internationalism: Conservative Evangelicals and the League of Nations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Ruth B. 1958. A History of the United Nations Charter; the Role of the United States, 1940–1945. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence and International Organization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Ken. 2000. The Evolving Arms Control Agenda: Implications of the Role of NGOs in Banning Antipersonnel Landmines. World Politics 53 (1): 74–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, Randy. 2005. Disarmament without Agreements? International Negotiation 10: 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, Randy. 2006. Looking Back: Going for Baruch: The Nuclear Plan that Refused to Go Away. Arms Control Today 36 (5): 45.Google Scholar
Rydell, Randy. 2007. Security through Disarmament: The Story of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2 (1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Johnathan. 2008. Learning the Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. European Law Journal 14 (3): 271–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2010. Learning From Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU. In Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, edited by Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J.. 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 1997. Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security 21 (3): 54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 2011. The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. and Waltz, Kenneth N.. 2003. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 2008. Historical Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Binder, Sarah A., Rhodes, R.A.W. and Rockman, Bert A.. 39–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 2005. Global Collective Action. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sangillo, Gregg. 2003. Is the Nonproliferation Treaty in Tatters? National journal 35 (28): 2268.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence. 1995. Does the NPT Matter? In 1995: A New Beginning For the NPT?, edited by Pilat, Joseph F. and Pendley, Robert E.. 217–235. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence. 2003. Shadow & Substance: Securing the Future of Atoms for Peace. IAEA Bulletin 45 (2): 7–9.Google Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence. 2004. Article IV of the NPT: Background, Problems, Some Prospects. WMD Commission Working Paper #5.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. and Harvard University. Center for International Affairs. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., Halperin, Morton H., and Twentieth Century Fund. 1985. Strategy and Arms Control. Washington, D.C.: Pergamon-Brassey's.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 1998. Nato Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation. Security Studies 8 (2): 198–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2000. International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment. European Journal of International Relations 6 (1): 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. 1973. The Imperial Presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, James. 2000. The Demise of Arms Control? The Washington Quarterly 23 (2): 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Stephen C. 2003. Act of Creation. Boulder, C.O.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillippe. 2001. What is There to Legitimize in the European Union…and How Might This Be Accomplished? Jean Monet Working Paper (75): 1.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan A. 2004. Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, Jan A. 2011. Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, George, Perry, William, Kissinger, Henry, and Nunn, Sam. 2008. Toward a Nuclear Free World. Wall Street Journal, January 15.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2001. The Problem of International Order Revisited: A Review Essay. International Security 26 (1): 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2014. Maxwell's Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord in the New Millenium. Baltimore, M.D.: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, George. 1974. The Rise and Fall of the League of Nations. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Scott, Joanne and Trubek, David M.. 2002. Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union. European Law Journal 8 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seckinelgin, Hakan and Shinoda, Hideaki. 2001. Ethics and International Relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave in association with Millennium Journal of International Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretariat of the League of Nations. 1930. Ten Years of World Co-Operation. London: Hazell, Watson, and Viney Ltd.Google Scholar
Shaker, Mohamed I. 1980. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origin and Implementation, 1959–1979. London; New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Shanks, Carol, Jacobson, Harold K, and Kaplan, Jeffrey H.. 1996. Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations: 1981–1992. International Organization 50 (4): 593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen, and Galvin, Daniel. 2006. Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2000. Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Siotis, Jean. 1983. The Institutions of the League of Nations The League of Nations. In Retrospect: Proceedings of the Symposium, edited by United Nations Library and the Graduate Institute of International Studies Geneva. 19–31. New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, M.A.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2008. Presidential Leadership in Political Time. Lawrence, K.S.: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Tulumello, Andrew S., and Wood, Stepan. 1998. International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship. American Journal of International Law [H.W.Wilson – SSA] 92 (3): 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jackie. 2008. Social Movements for Global Democracy. Baltimore, M.D.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie and Johnstone, Hank. 2002. Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements. Lanham, M.D.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger. 1987. Explaining the Nonproliferation Regime. International Organization 41 (2): 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. Coordination Versus Prisoner's Dilemma: Implications for Political Cooperation and Regimes. The American Political Science Review 79 (4): 923–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan and Viola, Lora A.. 2007. The Evolutionary Design of International Institutions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Snow, David and Benford, Robert. 1988. Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. In International Social Movement: From Structure to Action, edited by Klandermas, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter and Tarrow, Sidney. 197–217. Greenwich, C.T.: Jai Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2009. One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy found at http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/26/one-world-rival-theories/. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jed C. 1985. The Nonproliferation Regime: Managing the Impending Crisis. Journal of Strategic Studies 8 (4): 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Richard. 1993. Public Opinion in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Controversy over Contra Aid. Lanham, M.D.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Socolow, R. H. and Glaser, A.. 2009. Balancing Risks: Nuclear Energy & Climate Change. Daedalus 138 (4): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Squassoni, Sharon. 2009. Nuclear Energy: Rebirth or Resuscitation? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C. and can be found at http://carnegieendowment.org/files/nuclear_energy_rebirth_resuscitation.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Stanley, Richard and Kraig, Michael Ryan. 2003. The NPT: Can This Really Be Saved? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 59 (5): 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staples, Amy L. S. and Sayward, Amy L.. 2006. The Birth of Development: How the World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization, and World Health Organization Changed the World, 1945–1965. Kent, O.H.: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens. 2003. The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach. European Journal of International Relations 9 (2): 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Paul F. 2009. Institutional Resilience Amid Political Change: The Case of Biodiversity Conservation. Global Environmental Politics 9 (3): 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. 2008. Why is Historical Institutionalism. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Science, edited by Porta, Donatella Della and Keating, Michael. 118–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen A., and Longstreth, Frank. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Stober, Dan. 2003. No Experience Necessary. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. 59 (2) 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoiber, Carlton. 2003. The Evolution of the NPT Review Conference Final Documents, 1975–2000. The Nonproliferation Review (Fall-Winter): 126.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1982. Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis. In International Regimes, edited by Krasner, Stephen D.. 337–354. Ithaca, N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen A.. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stulberg, Adam N. and Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2013. The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security. Palo Alto, C.A.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweester, Arthur. 1940. The Non-Political Achievements of the League of Nations. Foreign Affairs 19 (1): 179–192.Google Scholar
Sweester, Arthur. 1946. From the League to the United Nations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 246: 1–8.Google Scholar
Szasz, Paul. 1980. The Conference on Excessively Injurious or Indiscriminate Weapons. The American Journal of International Law 74 (1): 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, William H. IV and Buchwald, Todd F.. 2003. Preemption, Iraq, and International Law. The American Journal of International Law 97 (3): 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa, and Jonsson, Christer. 2013. The Opening Up of International Relations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J. 2007. League of Nations. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tang, Shiping. 2013. The Social Evolution of International Politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization 53 (3): 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2005. Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo. International Security 29 (4): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2013. Justice and Fairness in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Ethics and International Affairs 27 (3): 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh C. 2006. The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh C. and Maley, William. 1999. The Ottawa Convention on Landmines: A Landmark Humanitarian Treaty in Arms Control? Global Governance 5 (3): 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharoor, Shashi. 2003. Why America Still Needs the United Nations. Foreign Affairs 82 (5): 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United Nations Library at Geneva. 1996. The League of Nations 1920–1946. New York.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen A. 2002. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 208–241. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen A. 2003. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 208–241. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen A. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, Wallace J. 2009. Why NATO Endures. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Daniel. 2001. The Helsinki Effect. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander. 2006. Coercion through IOs: The Security Council and the Logic of Information Transmission. International Organization 60 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander. 2009. Channels of Power: The UN Security Council and U.S. Statecraft in Iraq. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John A. 2010. Wilsonianism: The Dynamics of a Conflicted Concept. International Affairs 86 (1): 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, William R. 2001. Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles and Tarrow., Sidney G. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder, C.O.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Tkacik, M. 2002. Policy and Nuclear Proliferation: How Arms Control Encourages Proliferation. International Politics 39 (1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traub, James. 2004. The Netherworld of Nonproliferation. The New York Times, June 13.Google Scholar
Traub, James. 2006. Why Not Build A Bomb? The New York Times, January 29.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert and Henrickson, David C.. 2004. The Sources of American Legitimacy. Foreign Affairs 83 (6): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyson, Rhianna. 2005. Reframing the Debate Against Nuclear Weapons. IAEA Bulletin 46 (2): 16–19.Google Scholar
Underal, Arild. 1998. Explaining Compliance and Defection: Three Models. European Journal of International Relations 4 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1980. Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. 1977. Incendiary and Other Specific Conventional Weapons Which May Be the Subject of Prohibitions or Restrictions of Use for Humanitarian Reasons (32/152: Resolution). New York: United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
United Nations Library (Geneva, Switzerland), and Graduate Institute of International Studies (Geneva, Switzerland). 1983. The League of Nations in Retrospect: Proceedings of the Symposium. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Urquhart, Brian. 2010. UN Ideas that Changed the World – by Richard Jolly, Louis Emmerij, and Thomas G. Weiss. The New York Review of Books 57 (9): 26.Google Scholar
U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. 1975. Arms Control and Disarmament Agreements: Texts and History of Negotiations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency: for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of State. Office of International Security Operations. 1993. Hidden killers. Vol. 10098. Washington, D.C.: The Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of State. Office of International Security and Peacekeeping Operations, and United States. Dept. of State. Bureau of Political Military Affairs. 1994. The Global Landmine Crisis: 1994 Report to the U.S. Congress on the Problem with Uncleared Landmines and the United States Strategy for Demining and Landmine Control. Vol. 10225. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.Google Scholar
Utgoff, Victor A., and Institute for Defense Analyses. 1999. The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, U.S. Interests, and World Order. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vines, Alex. 1998. The Crisis of Anti-Personnel Mines. In To Walk without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 118–136. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Visschers, Vivian H. M., Keller, Carmen, and Siegrist, Michael. 2011. Climate Change Benefits and Energy Supply Benefits as Determinants of Acceptance of Nuclear Power Stations: Investigating and Explanatory Model. Energy Policy 39 (6): 3621–3629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2005. The Political Origins of the UN Security Council's Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force. International Organization 59 (3): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, William. 2000. Nuclear Order and Disorder. International Affairs 76 (4): 703–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallander, C. 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4): 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallander, Celeste A., Haftendom, Helga, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1990. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. 1st edn. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Francis P. 1952. A History of the League of Nations. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1981. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2012. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb: Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability. Foreign Affairs 91 (4): 2.Google Scholar
Waskan, Jonathan. 1998. De Facto Legitimacy and Popular Will. Social Theory and Practice 24 (1): 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Catherine. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton, N.J.; New York: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max, Roth, Guenther, and Wittich, Claus. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, C.A.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Andrew. Nov. 2005. The Transnational Dream: Politicians, Diplomats and Soldiers in the League of Nations’ Pursuit of International Disarmament, 1920–1938. Contemporary European History 14 (4): 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Len. 2003. Atoms for Peace. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 59 (November/December): 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2009. What's Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2011. Thinking about Global Governance: Why People and Ideas Matter. New York: The City University of New York; Routledge.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert G. 1919. The Idea of a League of Nations. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, Susan. 1995. Delegate Perspectives on the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference. The Nonproliferation Review (Spring/Summer): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (3): 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security 20 (1): 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2001. Driving through the Rearview Mirror. International Organization 55 (4): 1019–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley, Michael. 2005. It's Time to Scrap the NPT. Australian Journal of International Affairs 59 (3): 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Ramses. 2011. Dissolution and Succession: The Transmigration of the Soul of International Organizations. In Research Handbook on International Law, edited by Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Asa. Northhampton, M.A.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
White, Jerry and Rutherford, Ken. 1998. The Role of the Landmine Survivors Network. In To Walk without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 99–118. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley. 2007. Constructing Foreign Policy Crises: Interpretive Leadership in the Cold War and War on Terror. International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 779–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widamaier, Wesley, Blyth, Mark, and Seabrooke, Leonard. 2007. Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises. International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jody. 2000. David with Goliath: The International Campaign to Ban Land-mines. Harvard International Review 22 (3).Google Scholar
Williams, Jody and Goose, Stephen. 1998. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines. In To Walk without Fear, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 20–48. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Richard. 2000. International Regulation of Land Mines. In Commitment and Compliance, edited by Shelton, Dinah. 505–521. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Ward. 2007. The Winning Weapon? Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima. International Security 31 (4): 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Ward. 2013. Five Myths about Nuclear Weapons. Boston, M.A.: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S. 1997. Resisting the Bomb: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1954–1970. Stanford, C.A.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S. 2009. Confronting the Bomb: A Short History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Stanford, C.A.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wurst, Jim. 1996. Landmines: Bobbled Ban. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Accessed at www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/175/31348.html on December 27, 2015.Google Scholar
Yale Law School, Lillian Goldman Law Library. 2008a. Atlantic Charter. Accessed at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/atlantic.asp on December 27, 2015.Google Scholar
Yale Law School, Lillian Goldman Law Library. 2008b. Tehran Declaration. Accessed at www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/wwii/tehran.htm on December 27, 2015.Google Scholar
Yasuyuki, Ishida. 2011. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (1958–2000): Issues, Interests, and Ideas. New Delhi, India: Jawaharlal University Press.Google Scholar
Yodek, Armos. 1989. The Evolution of the United Nations System. New York: Crane Russak.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1979. Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications. Baltimore, M.D.: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1983. Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1989. The Effectiveness of International Institutions: Hard Cases and Critical Variables. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, edited by Czempiel, Ernst O. and Rosenau, James N.. Lexington, M.A.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1999a. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1999b. Governance in World Affairs. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunker, James A. 2011. The Idea of World Government: From Ancient Times to the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 2008. The Post-American World. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2012. Revisiting Second Image Reversed: Lessons from Turkey and Thailand. International Studies Quarterly 57 (1): 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2014. What Made the World Hang Together: Socialisation or Stigmatisation? International Theory 6 (2): 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmern, Alfred Eckhard. 1936. The Testing of the League. Foreign Affairs 14 (3): 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmern, Alfred Eckhard. 1939. League of Nations and the Rule of Law, 1918–1935. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
Zurn, Michael. 2004. Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 260–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • M. Patrick Cottrell
  • Book: The Evolution and Legitimacy of International Security Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316392799.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • M. Patrick Cottrell
  • Book: The Evolution and Legitimacy of International Security Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316392799.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • M. Patrick Cottrell
  • Book: The Evolution and Legitimacy of International Security Institutions
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316392799.008
Available formats
×