We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2017
SOURCES OF LAW AND THEIR EVOLUTION
REGULATING PRODUCT LIABILITY PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 85/374/EEC
Prior to the implementation of Directive 85/374/EEC, there was no specific legal regime for product liability in Dutch legislation. In the original proposal for a new Burgerlijk Wetboek (Dutch Civil Code, BW), dating back to 1961, a statute provision regarding product liability was included (art 6.3.13). However, this provision was removed from the proposal in 1976, when the legislator decided that the introduction of the European regulation, which was already proposed at that time, should be awaited. Due to this lack of statutory rules, tailored rules on product liability had been developed in case law on the basis of the tort law clause, art 6:162 BW (at that time art 1401 BW).
IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 85/374/EEC IN DUTCH LAW
1) Type of Legal Act
Directive 85/374/EEC has been implemented in Dutch law by the introduction of a separate section of the civil code; at that time arts 1407a–1407j BW (old). These provisions were replaced by arts 6:185–193 in the new BW, which entered into force in 1992. In addition, some statutory provisions were amended as a result of the implementation of the Directive. An example is art 6:173 BW (at that time art 6.3.2.5), which regulates liability for dangerous equipment. Paragraph 2 was added to this provision, excluding liability on the basis of art 6:173 BW for damage that falls within the ambit of art 6:185 ff BW, unless the criteria of subsections (a) and (b) are met (see more on this in section IX.A.4).
2) Regulatory Options
Directive 85/374/EEC granted the Member States the option to derogate from the Directive in specific situations. Firstly, Member States were allowed to codify that the definition of ‘product’ also includes primary agricultural products and game (art 15(1)(a)). Secondly, Member States could eliminate the state-of-the-art defence, thus leaving out the exclusion that the producer is not to be held liable if he proved that the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time when the product was put into circulation was not such as to enable the existence of the defect to be discovered (art 15(1)(b)), thereby broadening the scope of the product liability.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
