Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:31:35.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Bioethical analysis of the results: how well do laws and regulations address people's concerns?

from Part VI - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Matti Häyry
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Vilhjálmur Árnason
Affiliation:
University of Iceland, Reykjavik
Gardar Árnason
Affiliation:
University of Central Lancashire, Preston
Tuija Takala
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Bioethics and Moral Philosophy, University of Manchester UK; Adjunct Professor in Practical Philosophy, University of Helsinki Finland
Get access

Summary

People have concerns, and in democratic societies we expect these concerns to be somehow addressed by the public authorities. In this chapter, we propose to answer two questions. First, in the light of the sociological studies conducted by the ELSAGEN team, what are the main concerns that people in Estonia, Iceland, Sweden and the United Kingdom have regarding large-scale human genetic databases? And secondly, in the light of the research of the legal team, how well have the authorities of Estonia, Iceland, Sweden and the United Kingdom addressed these concerns? After these main considerations, we will conclude by presenting some remarks concerning the limitations of our brief analysis.

Trustworthiness as the main concern

It appears from the ELSAGEN work that people's main concerns in all four countries centre on the privacy of the citizens and on the trustworthiness of genetic-database operators in serving a valuable social function. As far as we can see, however, a felt need to strike a balance between these private and public concerns tends to make, on the whole, trustworthiness the primary issue. Respect for privacy can be seen as one of the criteria for assessing the goodness and reliability of the activity.

According to the sociological surveys of the ELSAGEN team, people's general attitudes towards genetic research and large-scale genetic databases are not particularly hostile. Especially in Estonia, optimism about science can be seen as a prominent force.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases
European Perspectives
, pp. 249 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×