Bibliography

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511494970.027

Bergkamp, L., ‘Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive in EU Member States’ (2005) ERA-Forum, pp. 389–400CrossRef Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L.,‘The Commission July 2001 Working Paper on Environmental Liability: Civil or Administrative Law to Prevent and Restore Environmental Harm?’ [2001] Env. Liability, pp. 207–16Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L.,‘The Commission's White Paper on Environmental Liability: A Weak Case for an EC Strict Liability Regime’ (2000) European Environmental Law Review, pp. 105–14 (Part I) and 141–7 (Part II)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernasconi, C., ‘Civil Liability Resulting from Transfrontier Environmental Damage: A Case for the Hague Conference?’ Preliminary Document No. 8 of April 2000 for the attention of the Special Commission of May 2000 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference, pp. 1–82 (available from http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/gen_pd8e.pdf)

Betlem, G., ‘Scope and Defences of the 2004 Environmental Liability Directive: Who Is Liable for What?’ (2005) ERA-Forum, pp. 376–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Betlem, G., and Brans, E. (eds.), Environmental Liability in the EU – The 2004 Directive Compared with US and Member State Law (London, 2006)Google Scholar

Binger, B. R., Copple, R., and Hoffmann, E., ‘Contingent Valuation Methodology in the Natural Resource Damage Regulatory Process: Choice Theory and the Embedding Phenomenon’ (1995) Natural Resources Journal (US) 35 (3), pp. 443–59Google Scholar

Blatch, C., ‘Environmental Liability Directive – Remediation of Damage’ [2004] 16 (5) Environmental Law and Management (UK-based journal), pp. 234et seq.Google Scholar

Bocken, H., ‘Financial Guarantees in the Environmental Liability Directive: Next Time Better’ (2006) European Environmental Law Review, pp. 13–32Google Scholar

Brans, E., ‘Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources under the 2004 EC Environmental Liability Directive: Standing and Assessment of Damages’ (2005) 7 Env. L. Rev., pp. 90–109CrossRef Google Scholar

Brans, E.,‘EC Proposal for an Environmental Liability Directive: Standing and Assessment of Damages’ [2002] Env. Liability, pp. 135–46Google Scholar

Brans, E.,Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources (The Hague, 2001)Google Scholar

Brans, E., and Uilhoorn, M., ‘Liability for Ecological Damage and Assessment of Ecological Damage’ (Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1997) (available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/liability/background.htm)

Carrera, A., ‘Natural Resource Damage Assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990’ (1996) 3 Env. Law, pp. 251–61Google Scholar

Cruden, J. C., ‘Natural Resource Damages’, SE98 ALI-ABA (2000)

Smedt, K., ‘Is Harmonization of Environmental Liability Rules Needed in an Enlarged European Union?’ (2004) 13 (2) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, pp. 164–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Deloddere, S., and Ryckbost, D., ‘Liability for Contaminated Sites’ (University of Ghent, 1997) (available from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/liability/pdf/soilcont.pdf)

ERM Economics, Economic Aspects of Liability and Joint Compensation Systems for Remedying Environmental Damage (London, 1996)

Farnsworth, N., ‘Is the Directive on Environmental Liability with Regard to Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage Justified under the Subsidiarity Principle?’ (2004) European Environmental Law Review, pp. 176–85Google Scholar

Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability and Compensation in Environmental Liability (Vienna and New York, 2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Faure, M.‘The White Paper on Environmental Liability: Efficiency and Insurability Analysis’ [2001] Env. Liability, pp. 188–201Google Scholar

Faure, M., and Smedt, K., ‘Should Europe Harmonize Environmental Liability Legislation?’ [2001] Env. Liability, pp. 217–37Google Scholar

Fogleman, V., ‘Enforcing the Environmental Liability Directive: Duties, Powers and Self-Executing Provisions’ [2006] Env. Liability, pp. 127–46Google Scholar

Fogleman, V.,‘Some Questions Answered on the Proposed EC Green Liability Regime’ (2002) 14 Environmental Law and Management (UK-based journal), pp. 11–13Google Scholar

George, G. F., ‘Litigation of Claims for Natural Resources’, SE98 ALI-ABA (2000)

Grayson, L., Picker, C., Siros, S. and Bettison, S., ‘The Business Dilemma: 21st Century Natural Resource Damage Liabilities for 20th Century Industrial Progress’ (2001) 31 European Law Review (UK-based journal), pp. 11356–79Google Scholar

Hagenah, E., ‘Ziel und Konzeption der künftigen EG-Richtlinie zur Umwelthaftung’, in Oldiges, M. (ed.), Umwelthaftung vor der Neugestaltung – Erwartungen und Anforderungen aufgrund des künftigen Europäischen Umwelthaftungsrechts (Baden-Baden, 2004), pp. 15–28Google Scholar

Halsbury's Statutes, vol. 45 (4th edn, London, 1999)

Hattan, E., ‘The Environmental Liability Directive’ [2002] Env. Liability, pp. 3–10Google Scholar

Hinteregger, M., ‘The New Austrian Act on Third Party Liability for Nuclear Damage’, Nuclear Law Bulletin, No. 62 (December 1998) pp. 27–50 (available from www.nea.fr/html/law/nlb/Nlb-62/hintereg.pdf)Google Scholar

Hinteregger, M., and Kissich, S., Atomhaftungsgesetz 1999 (Atomhaftungsgesetz 1999) (Vienna, 2004)Google Scholar

Hinteregger, M., and Kissich, S.,‘The Paris Convention 2004 – A New Nuclear Liability System for Europe’ [2004] Env. Liability, pp. 116–26Google Scholar

Hoffmann, B. (ed.), European Private International Law (Nijmegen, 1998)Google Scholar

Holt, M., and Cecil, G. R., ‘Natural Resource Damage for Oil Spills: The International Context’ (1995) 9 (4) Natural Resources and the Environment (US legal journal), pp. 28–31Google Scholar

Institut für Umweltrecht der JKU Linz and the Umwelt, Akademie für und Oberösterreich, Natur des Landes (eds.), Die neue EG-Umwelthaftung und ihre nationale Umsetzung (Vienna, 2005)Google Scholar

Jones, B., ‘European Commission: Proposal for a Framework Directive on Environmental Liability’ (2002) 14 Environmental Law and Management (UK-based journal), pp. 5–10Google Scholar

Graziano, Kadner T., Europäisches Internationales Deliktsrecht (Tübingen, 2003)Google Scholar

Karrer, P., and Arnold, K., Switzerland's Private International Law Statute (Deventer, 1989)Google Scholar

Kaster, S., ‘Natural Resource Damage Assessments’ (2000) 15 Natural Resources and the Environment (US legal journal), pp. 114et seq.Google Scholar

Kissich, S., Internationales Atomhaftungsrecht: Anwendungsbereich und Haftungsprinzipien (Baden-Baden, 2004)Google Scholar

Kohler, C., ‘Interrogations sur les sources du droit international privé européen après le traité d'Amsterdam’ (1999) Revue critique de droit international privé (legal journal, France), pp. 1–30Google Scholar

Krämer, L., ‘Directive 2004/35 on Environmental Liability and Environmental Principles’ (2005) Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Belgian Environmental Damage and Liability Law Review), pp. 131–4Google Scholar

Krämer, L.,‘Discussions on Directive 2004/35 Concerning Environmental Liability’ [2005] Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, pp. 250–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Krämer, L.,‘Directive 2004/35/EC on Environmental Liability’ [2004] Environmental Law and Management (UK-based journal), pp. 5–13Google Scholar

Lando, O., ‘The EC Draft Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations’ (1974) 38 RabelsZ, pp. 6–55Google Scholar

Lando, O., Hoffmann, B., and Siehr, K. (eds.), European Private International Law of Obligations (Tübingen, 1975)Google Scholar

McKenna & Co., Study of Civil Liability Systems for Remedying Environmental Damage (London, 1996) (available from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/liability/pdf/civiliability_finalreport.pdf)

Montesinos, M., ‘It May Be Silly, But It's an Answer: The Need to Accept Contingent Valuation Methodology in Natural Resource Damage Assessments’ (1999) 26 Ecology LQ, pp. 48–78Google Scholar

Morse, C., ‘Torts in Private International Law: A New Statutory Framework’ (1996) 45 (4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly (UK-based journal), pp. 888–902CrossRef Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development NEA (ed.), Reform of Civil Nuclear Liability: International Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, 31 May–3 June 1999 (2000)

Palmer, E., ‘The Austrian Codification of Conflicts Law’ (1980) 28 (2) American Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 197–234CrossRef Google Scholar

Pelzer, N., Brennpunkte des Atomenergierechts. Tagungsbericht der AIDN/INLA-Regionaltagung in Wiesbaden 2002 (Baden-Baden, 2003)Google Scholar

Posch, W., ‘New Developments in the Law of Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Spearheaded by Austria: From Privileges for the Nuclear Industry to a True Protection of Mankind and the Environment’ [1999] Env. Liability, pp. 81–3Google Scholar

Rehbinder, E., ‘Towards a Community Environmental Liability Regime: The Commission's White Paper on Environmental Liability’ [2000] Env. Liability, pp. 85–96Google Scholar

Remien, O., ‘European Private International Law, the European Community and Its Emerging Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (2001) Common Market Law Review, pp. 53–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Rice, P., ‘From Lugano to Brussels via Aarhus: Environmental Liability White Paper Published’ [2000] Env. Liability, pp. 39–45Google Scholar

Richman, W., and Reynolds, W., Understanding Conflict of Laws (3rd edn, Newark, 2002)Google Scholar

Robinson, J., ‘The Role of Nonuse Values in Natural Resource Damages: Past, Present, and Future’ (1996) 75 Texas Law Review, pp. 189–214Google Scholar

Ruffert, M., ‘Zur Konzeption der Umwelthaftung im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht’, in Hendler, R., Marburger, P., Reinhardt, M. and Schröder, M. (eds.), Umwelthaftung nach neuem EG-Recht (Berlin, 2005), pp. 43–72Google Scholar

Šarèeviæ, P., ‘The New Yugoslav Private International Law Act’ (1985) 33 (2) American Journal of Comparative Law, pp. 283–96Google Scholar

Slabbinck, R., Descamps, H., and Bocken, H., ‘Implementation of the Environmental Damage Directive in Belgium (Flanders)’ [2006] Env. Liability, pp. 3–12Google Scholar

Thompson, D. B., ‘Valuing the Environment: Courts’ Struggles with Natural Resource Damages’ (2002) 32 (1) Env. Law, pp. 57–89Google Scholar

Varady, T., ‘Some Observations on the New Yugoslav Private International Law Code’ (1983) Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, pp. 69et seq.Google Scholar

Wagner, G., ‘Die gemeinschaftsrechtliche Umwelthaftung aus der Sicht des Zivilrechts’, in Hendler, R., Marburger, P., Reinhardt, M. and Schröder, M. (eds.), Umwelthaftung nach neuem EG-Recht (Berlin, 2005), pp. 73–146Google Scholar

Wenneras, P., ‘A Progressive Interpretation of the Environmental Liability Directive’ [2005] Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, pp. 257–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Apathy, Peter, Kommentar zum Eisenbahn- und Kraftfahrzeughaftpflichtgesetz: Eisenbahn- und Kraftfahrzeughaftpflichtgesetz (Vienna, 1992)Google Scholar

Bydlinski, Peter, ‘Neuerungen im Nachbarrecht’, Juristische Blätter (legal journal) 2004, 86–97Google Scholar

Danzl, Karl-Heinz, Kommentar zum Eisenbahn- und Kraftfahrzeughaftpflichtgesetz (7th edn, Vienna, 2002)Google Scholar

Ehrenzweig, Armin and Mayrhofer, Heinrich, System des österreichischen allgemeinen Privatrechts II: Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil (3rd edn, Vienna, 1986)Google Scholar

[Gimpel-]Hinteregger, Monika, ‘Deliktische Haftung bei Deponien’, in Ferdinand Kerschner (ed.), Haftung bei Deponien (Vienna, 1996), 64–93

[Gimpel-]Hinteregger, Monika,‘Umwelthaftung in Österreich’, PHi 1996, 202–20Google Scholar

[Gimpel-]Hinteregger, Monika,Grundfragen der Umwelthaftung (Vienna, 1994)Google Scholar

[Gimpel-]Hinteregger, Monika,‘Anspruchsgrundlagen für den Ersatz von Umweltschäden’, Österreichische Juristenzeitung (legal journal) 1991, 145–54Google Scholar

Bernhard, Hüttler, Die zivilrechtliche Haftung für Altlasten unter Berücksichtigung des Amtshaftungsgesetz, ALSG, Abfallwirtschaftsgesetz, Forstgesetz, WRG und der GewO (Vienna, 1993)Google Scholar

Jabornegg, Peter and Rudolf, Strasser, Nachbarrechtliche Ansprüche als Instrument des Umweltschutzes (Vienna, 1978)Google Scholar

Kathrein, Georg, ‘Mehr Licht!’, Fachzeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2003, 894–8Google Scholar

Kerschner, Ferdinand, ‘Neues Nachbarrecht: Abwehr negativer Immissionen/Selbsthilferecht’, RZ 2004, 9–15Google Scholar

Kerschner, Ferdinand‘Kausalitätshaftung im Nachbarrecht?’, Recht der Umwelt (legal journal) 1998, 10–15Google Scholar

Kerschner, Ferdinand, and Weiβ, Rainer, WRG (Vienna, 2003)Google Scholar

Kissich, Susanne, and Pfurtscheller, Bettina, ‘Der Baum am Nachbargrund – wirksamer Rechtsschutz durch das Zivilrechts-Änderungsgesetz 2004?’, Österreichische Juristenzeitung (legal journal) 2004, 706–23Google Scholar

Kisslinger, Martina, Gefährdungshaftung im Nachbarrecht (Vienna, 2006)Google Scholar

Helmut, Koziol, Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht I (3rd edn, Vienna, 1997)Google Scholar

Helmut, Koziol,Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht Besonderer Teil II (2nd edn, Vienna, 1984)Google Scholar

Koziol, Helmut and Welser, Rudolf, Grundriss des bürgerlichen Rechts I (13th edn, Vienna, 2006)Google Scholar

Koziol, HelmutGrundriss des bürgerlichen Rechts II (13th edn, Vienna, 2007)Google Scholar

Oberleitner, Franz, Wasserrechtsgesetz (Vienna, 2004)Google Scholar

Raschauer, Bernhard, Kommentar zum Wasserrecht (Vienna, 1993)CrossRef Google Scholar

Rummel, Peter, Kommentar zum Allgemeinen bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch I (3rd edn, Vienna, 2000); II (2nd edn, Vienna, 1992); II/2b (3rd edn, Vienna, 2004)Google Scholar

Rummel, Peter,‘Offenbar’ drohender Schaden – offenbar anders gemeint? Zur Neuregelung des Überhangsrechts in § 422 Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch durch das ZivRÄG 2004’, Juristische Blätter (legal journal) 2003, 956Google Scholar

Schilcher, Bernd, and Posch, Willibald, ‘Civil Liability for Pure Economic Loss: An Austrian Perspective’, in Efstathios, K. Banakas (ed.), Civil Liability for Pure Economic Loss (London, 1996), 149–79Google Scholar

Schwimann, Michael, Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Praxiskommentar VI (3rd edn, Vienna, 2006)Google Scholar

Schwimann, Michael and Bea, Verschraegen, Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Praxiskommentar II (3rd edn, Vienna, 2005)Google Scholar

Erika, Wagner, Die Betriebsanlage im zivilen Nachbarrecht (Vienna, 1997)Google Scholar

Erika, Wagner,‘Haftung bei Verkehrswertminderung durch Sendemasten’, Recht der Umwelt (legal journal) 2006, 100–4Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., ‘Allocating Unknown Risk: Liability for Environmental Damages Caused by Deliberately Released Genetically Modified Organisms’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Belgian Environmental Damage and Liability Law Review), 2000, 104–14Google Scholar

Bocken, H., ‘Toerekening van aansprakelijkheid op grond van de eqivalentieleer’, in Tillemans, B. and Claeys, I. (eds.), Buitencontractuele aansprakelijkheid (Die keure, 2004)Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,‘Tort Law’, in Bocken, H., and Bondt, W. (ed.), Introduction to Belgian Law (Brussels, Bruylant; The Hague, London and Boston, Kluwer Law International, 2001), 269Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,‘The Compensation of Ecological Damage in Belgium’, in , P. Wetterstein (ed.), Harm to the Environment (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997), 143–58Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,‘Actuele problemen inzake het oorzakelijk verband’, in Storme, M. (ed.), Recht halen uit aansrakelijkheid (Gent, Breech, iutgevers, 1993), 81–121Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,‘La réparation des dommages causés par la pollution en droit belge. La situation en 1992’, Tijdschrift voor Belgisch Burgerlijk Recht (law review), 1992, 284–327Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,‘Milieuwetgeveing en onroerende goederen. Aansprakelijkheid voor de kosten van bodemsanering’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 1992, 7–88Google Scholar

Bocken, H.,Het aansprakelijkheidsrecht als sanctie tegen de verstoring van het leefmilieu (Brussels, Bruylant, 1978)Google Scholar

Bocken, H., and Boone, I., ‘Causaliteit in het Belgiche recht’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 2002 (4)Google Scholar

Bocken, H., Boone, I., Claessens, B., Couny, D., Kezel, E., and Smedt, P., De herziening van de bevrijdende verjaring door de wet van 10 juin 1998. De gelijkheid hersteld? (Antwerp, Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, 1999)Google Scholar

Bocken, H., and Saegher, T., ‘Aansprakelijkheid en financiële zekerheden na Vlarem II’, TMR, 1993, 80Google Scholar

Bocken, H., and Deloddere, S., ‘Vergoeding van milieschade’, in Recht voor de onderneming, X. Milieu en stedenbouw (Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, 1998), X, 50–5Google Scholar

Boone, I., ‘Recente ontwikkelingen inzake causaliteit’, in Gent, Vlaams Conferentie der balie (ed.), Aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Maklu, 2004)Google Scholar

Carette, A., Herstel van en vergoeding voor aantasting niet toegeëigende milieubestanddelen (Antwerp-Groningen, Intersentia Rechtswetenschappen, 1997)Google Scholar

Claeys, I., ‘De nieuwe verjaringswet: een inleiddende verkenning’, Rechtskundig weekblad (law review), 1998–9, 377Google Scholar

Coenraets, P., ‘La responsabilité de l'entreprise du fait des déchets. Aspects pénaux et civils’, in L'entreprise et la gestion des déchets (Brussels, Bruylant, 1993), 275–92Google Scholar

Cornelis, L., Beginselen van het Belgische buitencontractuele aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Antwerp, Maklu; CED Samson, Brussels; Brussels, Bruylant, 1989), 670–720Google Scholar

Cornelis, L.,De buitencontractuele aansprakelijkheid voor schade veroorzaakt door zaken (Antwerp, Kluwer, 1982), Beginselen, 455–517Google Scholar

Cousy, H., and Vanderspikken, A., ‘Causation under Belgian Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (Kluwer Law International, 2000), 35Google Scholar

Dalq, R. O., ‘La loi du 10 juin 1998 modifiant certaines dispositions en matière de prescription’, Journal des Tribunaux, 1998, 705Google Scholar

Kezel, E., ‘Enkele problemen inzake de vergoeding van schade ten gevolge van een blootstelling aan asbest’, Tijdschrift voor Milieurecht, 2000, 343–8Google Scholar

Page, H., Traité élémentaire de droit civil belge (1960), II, 960

Smedt, P., ‘Aansprakelijkstelling voor en herstel van schade door de aantasting van het mariene leefmilieu: beroerde baren van de vergramde Neptunus’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht, 2002 (2), 1067–185Google Scholar

Temmerman, B., and Kezel, E., Normering in België de indicatieve tabel. Tijdschrift voor vergoeding personenschade (2002), 103

Deketelaere, M., ‘Milieu en burgerlijk aansprakelijkheidsrecht’, in Deketelaere, K. (ed.), Handboek milieurecht, 1189Google Scholar

Deloddere, S., ‘Herstel en vergeoding van ecologische schade’ (unpublished research paper, Ghent University, 2002)

Faure, M., (G)een schijn van kans: beschouwingen over het statistisch causaliteitsbewijs bij milieugezondheidsschade (Antwerp, Maklu, 1993)Google Scholar

Larmuseau, I., ‘De milieuzorgplichtbepaling van artikel 22 Milieuvergunningsdecreet’, in balie gent, Vlaamse Conferentie (ed.), Straf recht-Strafrecht (Maklu, 2001), 171Google Scholar

Mougenot, R., Droit des Obligations. La preuve (Brussels, Répertoire notarial, 1997), 81Google Scholar

Oschinsky, S., and Oschinsky, Y., ‘Les organismes génétiquement modifiés et le droit’, Journal des Tribunaux, 2000, 781–7Google Scholar

Ronse, J., Aanspraak op schadeloosstelling uit onrechtmatige daad (Brussels, 1954), No. 196, 158Google Scholar

Ronse, J., Wilde, L., Claeys, A., and Mallems, I., ‘Schade en schadeloosstelling’, APR, Story-Scientia, 1998, No. 30, 91–118Google Scholar

Simoens, D., ‘Schade en schadeloosstelling’, in Beginselen van Belgisch privaatrecht, XI (Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, 1999), 18–20Google Scholar

Stijns, S., and Vuye, H., ‘Burenhinder’, in Beginselen van Belgisch privaatrecht, V, Zakenrecht, Book IV (Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar

Storme, M., De bewijslast in het Belgisch privaatrecht (Gent, 1962)Google Scholar

Gerven, W., and Covenmaeker, S., Verbintenissenrecht (Acco, 2001), 269Google Scholar

Hoorick, G., ‘Vergoeding van ecologische schade’, Tijdschrift voor Milieurecht, 2000, 150Google Scholar

Oevelen, A., ‘Civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid voor milieuschade’, in CBR, Rechtspratijk en milieubescherming (Antwerp, Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, 1991), 162Google Scholar

Ommeslaghe, P., and Cornelis, L., ‘Les faits justificatifs dans le droit belge de la responsabilité aquilienne’, in In memoriam Jean Limpens (Antwerp, Kluwer), 265–87

Quickenborne, M., De oorzakelijkheid in het recht van de burgerlijke aansprakelijkheid (Gent, 1972), 131Google Scholar

Borre, Vanden T., Efficiënte preventie en compensatie van catatsroferisco's. Het vorbeeld van schade door kernongevallen (Intersentia Rechtswetenschappen, 2001)Google Scholar

Vansweevelt, T., De civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid van de geneesheer en van het ziekenhuis (Antwerp, Maklu; CED Samson, Brussels; Brussels, Bruylant), 388–90

Brearly, J., ‘Public Welfare v. “Natural Use” of Land as the Basis for Liability in Environmental Damage Cases: Some Perspectives on the Past and Possible Future Roles of Tortious Remedies’, Journal of Environmental Law 7 (1995) 119–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Buckley, R., The Law of Nuisance (Butterworths, 1981)Google Scholar

Cross, G., ‘Does Only the Careless Polluter Pay? A Fresh Examination of the Nature of Private Nuisance’, Law Quarterly Review 111 (1995) 445–74Google Scholar

Dolding, L., and Mullender, R., ‘Environmental Law: Notions of Strict Liability’, Journal of Business Law (1995) 93–101Google Scholar

Fleming, J. G., The Law of Torts (8th edn, Law Book Company, 1992)Google Scholar

Gearty, C., ‘The Place of Private Nuisance in a Modern Law of Torts’, Cambridge Law Journal [1989] 214–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodhart, A. L., ‘Liability for Things Naturally on the Land’, Cambridge Law Journal [1930] 13–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Harpwood, V., Principles of Tort Law (4th edn, Cavendish, 2000)Google Scholar

Lowry, J., and Edmunds, R. (eds.), Environmental Protection and the Common Law (Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. S., and Deakin, S. F., Tort Law (4th edn, Clarendon Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Newark, F. H., ‘Non-Natural User and Rylands v. Fletcher’, Modern Law Review 24 (1961) 557–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Newark, F. H.‘The Boundaries of Nuisance’, Law Quarterly Review 65 (1949) 480–90Google Scholar

Ogus, A., ‘Water Rights Diluted’, Journal of Environmental Law 6 (1994) 137–56Google Scholar

Pugh, C., and Day, M., Toxic Torts (Cameron and May, 1992)Google Scholar

Rossi, Sir H., ‘Paying for Our Past – Will We?’, Journal of Environmental Law 7 (1995) 1–10CrossRef Google Scholar

Shelbourn, Carolyn, ‘Historic Pollution – Does the Polluter Pay?’, Journal of Planning Law (1994) 703–9Google Scholar

Stallybrass, W. T. S., ‘Dangerous Things and the Non-Natural User of Land’, Cambridge Law Journal [1929] 376–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Weir, T., ‘Rylands v. Fletcher Reconsidered’, Cambridge Law Journal [1994] 216–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilkinson, D., ‘Cambridge Water Company v. Eastern Counties Leather plc: Diluting Liability for Continuing Escapes’, Modern Law Review 57 (1994) 799–811CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, D. W., ‘Non-Natural Use of Land’ Cambridge Law Journal [1973] 310–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Woolley, D., Pugh-Smith, J., Langham, R., and Upton, W., Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Ekroos, M., Saastuneet maa-alueet ja jätehuoltovastuu Suomessa ja Euroopan Yhteisössä (Polluted Soil and Waste Liability in Finland and the European Community) (Helsinki, 1994)Google Scholar

Euroopan Neuvoston ympäristövahinkoyleissopimuksen voimaansaattaminen (Enforcement of the Civil Environmental Liability Convention of the Council of Europe), Publications of the Ministry of Justice 2/1995

European Environment Agency, ‘Management of Contaminated Sites in Western Europe’, Topic Report No. 13/1999 (Copenhagen, 2000)

Herler, C., Miljörisker och företagsförvärvarens undersökningsskyldighet (Environmental Risks and the Operator's Duty to Assess) (Business Law Forum, 2005, Edita Helsingfors 2005), 169–210

Hollo, E. J., ‘Environmental Liability and the Precautionary Principle’, in Liber Amicorum Gunnar Schram (Reykjavík Almenna bókafélagid, 2001), 201–16

Hollo, E. J.,Ympäristönsuojeluoikeus (Environmental Protection Law) (Helsinki, 2001)Google Scholar

Hollo, E. J., and Vihervuori, P., Ympäristövahinkolaki (Environmental Damages Act) (Helsinki, 1995)Google Scholar

Sandvik, B., Miljöskadeansvar (Environmental Liability) (Åbo Akademi University Press, Åbo, 2002)Google Scholar

Tuomainen, J., Vastuu saastuneesta ympäristöstä (Responsibility for Polluted Environment) (Helsinki, 2001)Google Scholar

Ympäristöministeriö (Ministry of the Environment), ‘Saastuneet maa-alueet ja niiden käsittely Suomessa’ (Polluted Soil and the Management in Finland), Report 5/1994

Abravanel-Jolly, S., ‘Le Fonds de garantie des accidents de circulation et de chasse rebaptisé Fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages’, Jurisclasseur Responsabilité civile & assurances, 2004, chroniques, p. 4

Barrois, H., Casson, P., ‘Assurance contre les actes de terrorisme’, Jurisclasseur Responsabilité civile et assurances, vol. VII, fasc. 558

Bechmann, P., ‘L'indemnisation des victimes de l'amiante. Note relative aux arrêts de la Cour de cassation du 28 février 2002’, Environnement, vol. II, 2003, No. 2, p. 8

Bechmann, P., and Mansuy, V., Le principe de précaution (Litec, 2002)Google Scholar

Boivin, J.-P., and Hercé, S., ‘La loi du 30 juillet 2003 sur les risques technologiques et naturels majeurs’, Actualité juridique Droit administratif, 6 October 2003, p. 1765

Buchet, C., Les voyous de la mer (Ramsay, 2003)Google Scholar

Chabanne-Pouzynin, L., and Deharbe, D., ‘L'affaire de Guingamp ou la condamnation de l'Etat en matière de pollution de l'eau par les nitrates’, Droit de l'environnement, No. 89, 2001, p. 99

Chao, W., La pollution du fait du transport maritime des hydrocarbures (Pédone, 1994)Google Scholar

Cossalter, P., and Salamand, P., ‘Responsabilité et pollution à la dioxine’, Droit de l'environnement, No. 100, 2002, p. 193

Deharbe, D., Le droit de l'environnement industriel: Dix ans de jurisprudence (Litec, 2002)Google Scholar

Despax, M., Droit de l'environnement (Litec, 1980)Google Scholar

Durand, C., ‘Droit de la santé publique et protection des travailleurs: le cas de l'amiante’, Droit de l'environnement, No. 96, 2002, p. 54

Fabrice, L. (ed.), La responsabilité du fait des choses (Economica, 1997)Google Scholar

Frémeaux, E., ‘La pollution des sols et la responsabilité contractuelle’, Gazette du Palais, 5 May 1994, p. 563

Geuttier, C., Droit administratif (2nd edn, Paris, Montchrestien, 2000)Google Scholar

Gilles, M., ‘Les risques tenant à la pollution des sols’, Revue du droit immobilier, 1997, p. 559

Gory, C., ‘La loi du 30 juillet 2003 relative à la prévention des risques technologiques et naturels et à la réparation des dommages – L'assurance et les risques technologiques et naturels’, Gazette du Palais, 3 October 2003, p. 2744

Guihal, D., Droit répressif de l'environnement (2nd edn, Economica, 2000)Google Scholar

Izorche, M.-L., Le vendeur professionnel entre vices cachés et jurisprudence hermétique (Dalloz, 2000), chronique, p. 407Google Scholar

Lambert-Faivre, Y., Droit des assurances (11th edn, Dalloz, 2002)Google Scholar

Lambrechts, C., ‘Montchanin côté cour’, Revue juridique de l'environnement, 1991, p. 5

Larroy-Castera, X., and Ourliac, J.-P., ‘Risques et urbanisme’, Le Moniteur, Paris, 2004

Lavoillotte, M.-P., ‘Responsabilité environnementale: les principales causes exonératoires’, Environnement, vol. II, 2003, No. 1, p. 23

Littman-Martin, J., and Lambrechts, C., ‘La spécificité du dommage écologique’, in SFDE, Le dommage écologique en droit interne, communautaire & comparé (Economica, 1992), p. 63Google Scholar

Malaval, F., Développement durable, assurances et environnement (Economica, 1999)Google Scholar

Martin, G. J., ‘Réflexions sur la définition du dommage à l'environnement’, in Droit et environnement (Presses universitaires d'Aix-Marseille, 1995), p. 118Google Scholar

Piquemal, A., ‘L'indemnisation des dommages écologiques par le FIPOL’, Espaces et ressources maritimes, vol. XIV, 2001, p. 123

Prieur, M. (ed.), Sites contaminés en droit comparé de l'environnement (Presses universitaires de Limoges, 1995)Google Scholar

Prieur, M. (ed.),Droit de l'environnement (5th edn, Dalloz, 2004)Google Scholar

Romi, R., ‘La responsabilité pour carence des autorités de police administrative’, Les Petites Affiches, 12 December 1986

Seguin, D., ‘Les atteintes à l'environnement dans la responsabilité civile: de l'illicite à l'anormal’, Droit de l'environnement, No. 117, 2004, p. 69

Starck, B., Roland, H., and Boyer, L., Obligations 1. Responsabilité délictuelle (5th edn, Litec, 1996)Google Scholar

Steichen, P., Les sites contaminés et le droit (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1996)Google Scholar

Trémorin, M., ‘Le privilège de la pré-occupation et la réparation des troubles du voisinage’, Revue de droit rural, No. 320, 2004, p. 95

Lang, A., Droit de l'environnement (Presses universitaires de France, 2002)Google Scholar

Vincent, F., ‘Risques d'atteintes à l'environnement et risques nucléaires’, Jurisclasseur droit des enterprises – Assurances, vol. II, fasc. 2660

Viney, G., L'introduction en droit français de la directive européenne du 25 juillet 1985 (Dalloz, 1998), II, chronique, p. 291Google Scholar

Viney, G., and Jourdain, P., Les effets de la responsabilité (2nd edn, Dalloz, 2001)Google Scholar

Czychowski, M., Wasserhaushaltsgesetz – Kommentar (8th edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Deutsch, E., Die Gesundheit als Rechtsgut im Haftungs- und Staatshaftungsrecht (1983), p. 93Google Scholar

Haft, F., Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil (9th edn, 2004)Google Scholar

Jarass, H. D., Bundesimmissionsschutzgesetz (7th edn, 2007)Google Scholar

Kloepfer, M., Umweltrecht (3rd edn, 2004)Google Scholar

Landsberg, G., and Lülling, W., Umwelthaftungsrecht (1991)Google Scholar

Lorenz, S., and Riehm, T., Lehrbuch zum neuen Schuldrecht (2002)Google Scholar

Medicus, D., ‘Zivilrecht und Umweltschutz’, Juristenzeitung 1986, p. 778 0214

Möllers, T. M. J., Rechtsgüterschutz im Umwelt- und Haftungsrecht (1996)Google Scholar

Münchner Kommentar, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, §§ 705–853 (3rd edn, 1996)

Oehmen, K., Umwelthaftung (1997)Google Scholar

Palandt, O., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (66th edn, 2007)Google Scholar

Reichsgerichtsrätekommentar, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, §§ 812–31 (12th edn, 1986)

Salje, P., and Peter, Jörg, Umwelthaftungsgesetz (Munich, 2005)Google Scholar

Schimikowski, P., Umwelthaftungsrecht und Umwelthaftpflichtversicherung (6th edn, 2002)Google Scholar

Schmid-Salzer, J., Kommentar zum Umwelthaftungsrecht (1992)Google Scholar

Soergel, H.-T., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (13th edn, 2002), §§ 854–1296 (12th edn, 1998), §§ 823–53

Staudinger, J. von, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (12th edn, 1986), §§ 823–32 (13th edn, 1999), §§ 823–5; (13th edn, 1997), §§ 830–8; (13th edn, 2002), §§ 903–24; Anhang zu § 906: Umwelthaftungsrecht, with book review by Möllers, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 197 (1997) p. 430

Wessels, J., and Hettinger, M., Strafrecht BT/I (27th edn, 2003)

Wolf, M., Sachenrecht (23th edn, 2007)

Álexiadis, S., Poiniki prostasia tou perivallontos (Penal Protection of the Environment) (1981)Google Scholar

Ándroulidaki-Dimitriadou, É., Stoicheia Dimosiou Dikaiou, Vol. A’, Sintagmatiko Dikaio, Prostassia tou Perivallontos (Elements of Public Law, Vol. A’, Constitutional Law, Protection of the Environment) (1980)

Arghiriadis, Á., ‘Prostassia tou Perivallontos’ (Protection of the Environment), Árm. 30, 533 et seq.

Ávrameas, P., ‘Astiki efthyni ek tis ekmetallefseos pyrinikou ploiou’ (Civil Liability from the Exploitation of a Nuclear Ship), NoV 11 (1963), 65–70

Balias, G., ‘I perivallontiki efthyni. Philosophikes, istorikes kai nomikes parametroi’ (Environmental Liability. Philosophical, Historical and Legal Parameters), Perivallon kai Dikaio 1/2001, 21–34

Balis, G., Empragmaton Dikaion (Real Property Law) (4th edn, 1961)Google Scholar

Chantzikonstantinou, K., Apeili kai prostassia tou Perivallontos apo ta opla (Threat and Protection of the Environment from Weapons) (1985)Google Scholar

Christodoulou, P., ‘Law of Obligations’, in Kerameus, K., and Kozyris, P. (eds.), Introduction to Greek Law (1993) (in English)Google Scholar

Dacoronia, E., ‘Ekpompes kai perivallontiki zimia apo leitourghia epicheirissis me adeia tis archis (schessi ton Astikos Kodikas 1003, 914)’ (Emissions and Damage to the Environment from the Operation of an Enterprise under Licence from the Competent Authority (Relation of Arts. 1003, 914 of the GCC)), Per Dik1/1997, 15–23

Dacoronia, E.,‘Mass Torts: A Greek Approach’, Revue Hellenique de droit international, 47 (in English)

Dagtoglou, P. D., Sintagmatiko Dikaio – Atomika Dikaiomata II (Constitutional Law – Private Rights) (Athens, Komotini, 1991)Google Scholar

Derventzas, B., ‘Rypansis tou perivallontos kai poiniki tis antimetopissi’ (The Pollution of the Environment and Its Penal Confronting), Penal Chronicles, 1977, 609 et seq.

Êoufakis, É., ‘Ennoia ton apovliton. Ethnikes rithmiseis, oi opoies thespizontai prin apo tin ekpnoi tis prothesmias metaforas mias koinotikis odighias sto esoteriko dikaio kai antivainoun pros to skopo aftis’ (Meaning of Waste: National Regulations, Which Are Enacted before the Expiration of the Deadline for the Transfer of a Community Directive in the Internal Law and Which Are Contrary to the Aim of the Said Directive), Environment and Law, 1998, 65

Filios, P., Enochiko Dikaio, Eidiko Meros (Law of Obligations, Special Part), II (5th edn, Athens, Komotini 2005)Google Scholar

Gasis, A., Ghenikai Archai Astikou Dikaiou (General Principles of Civil Law) (1973)

Georgiades, Ap., Enochiko Dikaio, Gheniko Meros (Law of Obligations, General Part) (Athens, 1998)Google Scholar

Georgiades Ap.,Åmpragmato Dikaio I (Real Property Law) (Athens, 1991)

Georgiades Ap.,‘Analysis of Arts. 914, 926, 930 and 932 of the GCC’, in Georgiades and Stathopoulos, Astikos Kodix (Civil Code) (Athens 1982)

Georgiades Ap.,Empragmaton Dikaion (Real Property Law), II 1, Kyriotis (Ownership) (Athens, 1975)

Georgiades Ap.,‘I astiki efthyni apo seismo’ (Civil Liability in Case of an Earthquake), Elliniki Dikaiosini 42, 1181–97

Giannakopoulou, Ê., Nomiki prostassia tou Perivallontos (Legal Protection of the Environment) (1981)

Karakostas I., Perivallon kai Dikaio (Environmental Law) (Athens, Komotini, 2000)

Karakostas, I.Koinotikoi Kanones kai Ethniko Astiko Dikaio (European Community Regulations and National Civil Law) (Athens, 1997)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I.,I efthyni tou paragogou ghia elattomatika proionta (Producer's Liability for Defective Products) (Athens, Komotini, 1995)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I.,Perivallon kai Astiko Dikaio (Environment and Civil Law) (Athens, Komotini, 1986)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I.,‘Analysis of Article 59 of the GCC’, in Georgiades and Stathopoulos, Civil Code (Athens, 1982)Google Scholar

Karakostas I.,‘Pighes afximenis rypanseos tou zotikou chorou kai antimetopissi tous apo to idiotiko dikaio’ (Sources of an Increased Pollution of the Vital Area and Their Confronting from the Private Law), NoV 31, 1314–22

Karakostas, I., with the collaboration of Giannopoulou, E., Koinotikoi Kanones kai Ethniko Astiko Dikaio. Provlimatiki – Nomothesia (Community Rules and National Civil Law: Problematic – Legislation) (Athens, 1997)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., with the collaboration of Tzouganatos, D., Prostasia tou katanaloti (n. 2251/1994) (Consumer's Protection (Law 2251/1994)) (Athens, Komotini, 1997)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., and Calavros, A., ‘I Lefki Vivlos tis Epitropis ton Evropaikon Koinotiton gia tin efthyni logo zimion apo th rypansi tou perivallontos’ (The White Paper of the EC Commission on Liability for Damage from the Pollution of the Environment), Perivallon kai Dikaio 4/2000, 531–43

Karakostas, I., and Nikas, D., Energeia kai perivallon stin prooptiki tis Evropis (Energy and Environment in the European Perspective) (Athens, Komotini, 1998)Google Scholar

Karakostas, I., and Vassilopoulos, I., Environmental Law in Greece (in English) (The Hague, London, Boston and Athens, 1999), originally published as a monograph in the International Encyclopaedia of Laws/Environmental LawGoogle Scholar

Kargados, , Zur Beweislast bei der Haftung für Umweltschäden (FSG Baumgärtel, 1990)Google Scholar

Kiantou-Pambouki, A., ‘H astiki efthyni ghia rypansi tis thalassas. Efthyni ypokeimeniki i antikeimeniki’ (Civil Responsibility for Sea Water Pollution: Liability Based on Fault or Strict Liability?) END 17, 1–10

Kornilakis, P., Eidiko Enochiko Dikaio (Law of Obligations, Special Part) (Athens, and Thessaloniki, 2000)Google Scholar

Kornilakis, P.Efthyni apo diakindynefsi (Risk Liability) (1982)Google Scholar

Kostopoulos, V., Provlimata nomikis prostassias apo ti rypansi tou perivallontos, Sinchrona Themata 7 (Problems of Legal Protection from the Pollution of the Environment, Contemporary Themes 7) (1980), 23 et seq.Google Scholar

Kotsiris, L., Astiki efthyni ghia rypansi thalassis apo petrelaioeidi (Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, Volume in Honor of Á. Litzeropoulos), vol. Á’ (Athens, 1985), 505–18Google Scholar

Kremlis, G., I Diachirissi ton apovliton stin Ellada (The Management of Waste in Greece) (under publication in the magazine, Financial Messenger)

Lytras, T., Zivilrechtliche Haftung für Umweltschäden (1995)Google Scholar

Mastroghamvraki, Á., ‘Tina peri nomikis prostassias tou Perivallontos’ (Some Aspects of the Legal Protection of the Environment), NoV 23 (1975), 1205–12Google Scholar

Nikas, D., Nomiki problimatiki tis prostassias tou Perivallontos (Legal Problematic about the Protection of the Environment) (1985)

Oikonomou, T., Diacheirissi stereon apovliton (Management of Solid Waste) (1997)Google Scholar

Papadimitriou, G. Dieisdissi tou Koinotikou Dikaiou stin Ellada ((Care) The Infiltration of European Community Law in Greece) (1994)

Papadopoulos, K., Arnitiki Agogi (Negatory Action) (1984)

Papantoniou, N., Ghenikai Arhai (General Principles) (1983)

Papathanasiou, C., ‘Efthyni ek pirinikon atychimaton kai to elliniko dikaio’ (Liability for Nuclear Accidents and the Greek Law), ÅÅÍ 29, 264–70

Portolou-Michael, A., ‘Ennoia tou perivallontos kai anagki prostassias tou’ (The Meaning of the Environment and the Need for Its Protection), Tï Suntagma, 1978, 278Google Scholar

Poulou, E., ‘Dikonomika zitimata stis astikes perivallontikes dikes’ (Procedural Issues in Civil Environmental Cases), Perivallon kai Dikaio 3/2000, 362–74Google Scholar

Rotis, N., Sintagmatiki katochyrossi tis prostassias tou Perivallontos (Constitutional Safeguarding of the Protection of the Environment) (Honorary Volume of the Council of the State I, 1979)

Rotis, V., Anoigmata tis nomologhias ghia tin prostassia tou Perivallontos (Development of the Jurisprudence for the Protection of the Environment, 1984)Google Scholar

Sakellaropoulos, Á., Skepseis ghia to provlima tou perivallontos apo nomiki skopia (Thoughts about the Problem of the Environment from a Legal View) (Honorary Volume of the Council of the State II, 1982)

Siouti, G., Dikaio Perivallontos (Gheniko Meros I Dimossio Dikaio kai Perivallon) (Environmental Law (General Part I Public Law and Environment)) (Athens, Komotini, 1993)Google Scholar

Siouti, G.,Sintagmatki katochyrossi tis prostassias tou Perivallontos (Constitutional Safeguarding of the Protection of the Environment, 1985)Google Scholar

Stathopoulos, M., Chiotellis, A., and Avghoustianakis, M., Koinotiko Astiko Dikaio I (Community Civil Law I) (Athens, Komotini, 1995)Google Scholar

Synodinos, C., ‘Diachirissi stereon apovliton. Einai i ethniki mas nomothesia simphoni me ti shetiki koinotiki odighia plaisio?’ (Management of Solid Waste: Is Our National Legislation in Accordance with the Relevant Community Directive Framework?), Environment and Law, 1998, 20

Tachos, Á., Dikaio Prostassias tou Perivallontos (Law on the Protection of the Environment) (5th edn, Thessaloniki, 1998)Google Scholar

Tachos, Á.,‘Prostassia tou Perivallontos’ (Protection of the Environment), Arm. 1983, 8 et seq.

Toussis, A., Empragmaton Dikaion (Real Property Law) (3rd edn, 1966)Google Scholar

Vougioukas, Ê., ‘Poiniki prostassia tou physsikou Perivallontos stin Elladha’ (Penal Protection of the Natural Environment in Greece), Arm. 1979, 981 et seq.

McMahon, and Binchy, , Irish Law of Torts (2nd edn, 1990)Google Scholar

Alpa, Bessone and Zencovich, Zeno, I fatti illeciti, in Trattato Rescigno, VI (Turin, 1995), 61 et seq.Google Scholar

Atelli, ‘Responsabilità per torto ecologico: la Cassazione imbocca una strada pericolosa’, Riv.crit.dir.priv., 1996, 699

Bata’, ‘Le nuove fontiere del danno ambientale’, Corriere Giuridico, 1995

Bianca, , Diritto civile, V, La responsabilità (Milan, 1994)Google Scholar

Buri, , Über Kausalität und Verantwortung (Leipzig, 1873)Google Scholar

Capria, , ‘La nuova disciplina sulla bonifica dei siti contaminati’, in Il Decreto Ronchi, pp. 39et seq.

Carpi-Taruffo, , Commentario Breve al Codice di Procedura Civile (Padua, 1999)Google Scholar

Feola, ‘Discarica abusiva e danno ambientale: applicazione retroattiva dell'art. 18 L. 349/86 e responsabilità (solidale) dei produttori di rifiuti e del proprietario locatore della discarica’, Responsabilità civile e previdenziale, 1996, 112

Forchielli, , Il rapporto di causalità nell'illecito civile (Padua, 1960)Google Scholar

Gambaro, , ‘Il diritto di proprietà’, in Trattato di Diritto Civile e Commerciale di Cicu-Messineo-Mengoni (Milan, 1995), pp. 496 et seq.Google Scholar

Giampietro, ‘Il danno ambientale tra l'art. 18 l.n. 349/1986 ed il regime ordinario di codice civile’, Giustizia civile, 1996, I, 780

Gorla, ‘Sulla cosiddetta causalità giuridica: fatto dannoso e conseguenze’, Rivista di diritto commerciale, 1951, I, 505 et seq.

Licci, , Teorie causali e rapporto di imputazione (Napies, 1996)Google Scholar

Monateri, , ‘Le fonti delle obbligazioni – La responsabilità civile’, in Trattato di Diritto Civile diretto da Rodolfo Sacco (Turin, 1998)Google Scholar

Nappi, , Le regole proprietarie e la teoria delle immissioni (Naples, 1986)Google Scholar

Pozzo, ‘Una nuova ipotesi di danno ambientale nell'art. 58 del Decreto legislativo 11 maggio 1999, n. 152’, Rivista Giuridica dell'Ambiente, 2000, pp. 979 et seq.

Pozzo, ,Il danno ambientale, collana Il diritto privato oggi, a cura di Paolo Cendon (Milan, 1998)Google Scholar

Pozzo, ,‘Constitutional Review of Disproportionately Different Periods of Limitation of Actions (Prescription)’, in European Review for Private Law, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 79–100Google Scholar

Pozzo, ,Danno ambientale e criteri di imputazione della responsabilità – Esperienze Giuridiche a confronto (Milan, 1996)Google Scholar

Prati, , ‘La responsabilità del detentore dei rifiuti per il corretto smaltimento’, in Il Decreto Ronchi (Milan, 1997), 31 et seq.Google Scholar

Procida Mirabelli di Lauro, ‘Immissioni, normale tollerabilità e tutela dell'ambiente, nota a Tribunale di Napoli, 15 febbraio 1988’, Rassegna di diritto civile, 1990, p. 903

Lauro, Procida Mirabelli di,Immissioni e ‘rapporto proprietario’ (Naples, 1984), pp. 97 et seq.Google Scholar

Realmonte, , Il problema del rapporto di causalità nel risarcimento del danno (Milan, 1967)Google Scholar

Roselli-Vitucci, , ‘La prescrizione e la decadenza’, in Trattato Rescigno vol. 20, La tutela dei diritti, II (Turin, 1985), 451Google Scholar

Salvi, , Le immissioni industriali, rapporti di vicinato e tutela dell'ambiente (Milan, 1979), pp. 147 et seq.Google Scholar

Stella, , Leggi scientifiche e spiegazione causale nel diritto penale (Milan, 1990)Google Scholar

Stella-Zuccala’, , Commentario Breve al Codice Penale (Padua, 1990)Google Scholar

Tolbert, ‘The Public as a Plaintiff: Public Nuisance and Federal Citizen Suits in the Exxon Valdez Litigation’, 14 Harvard Env. L. Rev. (1990) 511

Trimarchi, ‘Responsabilità civile per danno all'ambiente: prime riflessioni’, Amministrare, 1987, p. 189

Trimarchi, ,Causalità e danno (Milan, 1967)Google Scholar

Villa, , ‘Nesso di causalità e responsabilità civile per danni all'ambiente’, in Per una riforma della responsabilità civile per danno ambientale, a cura di P. Trimarchi (Milan, 1994), pp. 93 et seq.Google Scholar

Visintini, ‘Le immissioni nel quadro dei conflitti di vicinato, II, L'esperienza italiana’, Rivista di diritto civile, 1975, I, p. 29 et seq.

Asser-Hartkamp I, A. S. Hartkamp, Mr C. Asser's handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht, Verbintenissenrecht, vol. I, De Verbintenis in het algemeen (12th edn, 2004)

Asser-Hartkamp III, A. S. Hartkamp, Mr C. Asser's handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht, Verbintenissenrecht, vol. III, De Verbintenis uit de wet (11th edn, 2002)

Bastmeijer, C. J., ‘Schadevergoeding in geval van aantasting van natuurgebieden’, Milieu & Recht, 1992/10, pp. 514–23

Bauw, E., ‘Collectieve actie, milieuschade en massaschade’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht 2004–4, pp. 123–7

Bauw, E., and Brans, E. H. P., Milieuprivaatrecht (3rd edn, Deventer, Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar

Betlem, G., ‘Voorstel Richtlijn Milieuaansprakelijkheid: een eerste indruk’, TMA, 2002–2, pp. 29–32

Betlem, G.‘Standing for Ecosystems – Going Dutch’, Cambridge Law Journal, 1995, 54–1, pp. 159–70

Betlem, G.Civil Liability for Transfrontier Pollution, Dutch Environmental Tort Law in International Cases in the Light of Community Law (London, Dordrecht and Boston, Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, 1993)

Bocken, H., Preventie, toerekening en herstel van schade door milieuverontreiniging, Preadvies No. 33 (Deventer, Kluwer, 1983)Google Scholar

Brans, E. H. P., ‘De EU-Richtlijn Milieu-aansprakelijkheid’, Bouwrecht No. 1, January 2005, pp. 14–28

Brans, E. H. P.,‘Voorstel van de Europese Commissie voor een richtlijn milieuaansprakelijkheid (COM(2002) 17)’, Milieu & Recht, 2002–5, pp. 137–45 0332

Brans, E. H. P.,‘Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources, Standing, Damage and Damage Assessment’ (dissertation, Kluwer Law International, 2001)

Brans, E. H. P.,‘Liability for Ecological Damage under the1992 Protocols to the Civil Liability Convention and the Fund Convention, and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990’, Part II, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaanspraklijkheid, TMA, 1994–4, pp. 85–91

Brans, E. H. P., and Visser, B. M., ‘Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan bomen’, Milieu & Recht, 1996–7/8, pp. 132–9

Carette, A., Herstel van en vergoeding voor aantasting aan niet-toegeëigende milieubestanddelen (Antwerp-Groningen, Intersentia Rechtswetenschappen, 1997)Google Scholar

Dam, C. C., Aansprakelijkheidsrecht (Boom Juridische Uitgevers 2000)Google Scholar

van Dam, C. C.‘Zorgvuldigheidsnorm en aansprakelijkheid’ (dissertation, Utrecht and Deventer, Kluwer, 1989)

Dunné, J. M. (ed.), ‘Environmental Liability, Continental Style’, Environmental Contracts and Covenants: New Instruments for a Realistic Environmental Policy? (Lelystad, Vermande, 1993)Google Scholar

van Dunné, J. M. (ed.),‘Beantwoording rechtsvraag (217) onrechtmatige daad’, Ars Aequi 1992, p. 639

van Dunné, J. M. (ed.),‘Ontwikkelingsrisico's in de bouw; het verweer van de stand van de wetenschap en de techniek (“State of the Art”)’, Bouwrecht, 1988, pp. 321–31

Frenk, N., ‘Kollektieve akties in het privaatrecht’ (dissertation, Deventer, Kluwer, 1994)

van Gerven, W. (ed.), Lever, J., Larouche, P., Bar, C., and Viney, G., Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law: Scope of Protection: Ius Commune Casebooks for the Common Law of Europe (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar

Köster, H. K., Causaliteit en voorzienbaarheid (Rede Rotterdam, Zwolle, 1963)Google Scholar

Kottenhagen-Edzes, P. A., ‘Onrechtmatige daad en milieu’ (dissertation, Rotterdam, Arnhem, 1992)

Messer, E. A., ‘De “state of the art” in het milieu aansprakelijkheidsrecht’, Bedrijfsjuridische berichten, 1989

Schellen, J., Toerekening naar redelijkheid naar huidig en komend recht, Studiepockets privaatrecht No. 35 (Zwolle, 1985)Google Scholar

van Schellen, J.,‘Juridische causaliteit’ (dissertation, 1972)

Schut, G. H. A., Onrechtmatige daad volgens Burgerlijk Wetboek en NBW (Zwolle, Tjeenk Willink, 1990)Google Scholar

Seerden, R., and Heldeweg, M., Comparative Environmental Law in Europe (Apeldoorn and Antwerp, Makki Uitgevers, 1996)Google Scholar

Spier, J. (ed.), Hartlief, T., Maanen, G. E., and Vriesendorp, R. D., Verbintenissen uit de Wet en Schadevergoeding (2nd edn, Deventer, Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar

Spier, J., and Sterk, C. H. W. M., Aansprakelijkheid voor gevaarlijke stoffen: gevaarlijke stoffen, stortplaatsen, boorgaten en vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen, Serie Recht en Praktijk No. 88 (Deventer, Kluwer, 1995)Google Scholar

Wetterstein, P. (ed.), Harm to the Environment: The Right to Compensation and the Assessment of Damages (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar

van Wijmen, P. C. E., ‘Het milieu ieders zorg? Een terreinverkenning in privaatrechtelijke richting’, Milieu & Recht 1985/8, pp. 231–7

Canotilho, J. J., Actos administrativos jurídico-públicos e responsabilidade por danos ambientais (Coimbra, 1998)Google Scholar

Sendim, Cunhal, Reponsabilidade civil por danos ecológicos (Coimbra, 1998)Google Scholar

Amaral, Freitas D., ‘Lei de Bases do Ambiente e Lei das Associações de Defesa do Ambiente’, in O direito do ambiente (Lisbon, INA, 1994)Google Scholar

Lima, Pires, and Varela, Antunes, Código Civil Anotado, vol. III 0356Google Scholar

Cordeiro, Menezes A., Direitos Reais (Lisbon, 1999)Google Scholar

Cordeiro, Menezes A.,‘Tutela do ambiente e direito civil’, in Direito do ambiente (Lisbon, INA, 1994), pp. 377 et seq.Google Scholar

Menezes Leitão, J., ‘Instrumentos de direito privado para a protecção do ambiente’, RJUA, No. 7, p. 53

Mesquita, H., Direitos Reais (Coimbra, 1967)Google Scholar

Pinto, Mota C., Direitos Reais (Coimbra, 1976)Google Scholar

Pereira da Silva, V., Responsabilidade administrativa em matéria de ambiente (Lisbon, 1997)Google Scholar

Reis, Pereira J., Lei de Bases do Ambiente anotada e comentada

Bell, S., and McGillivray, D., Bell and Ball on Environmental Law (5th edn, 2000)Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘My Brother's Keeper? Liability for Acts of Third Parties’ (1994) 14 Legal Studies 88

Reid, E., ‘Financial Loss and Negligent Nuisance’, 2000 SLT (News) 151

Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia of the Laws of Scotland, vol. 14

Thomson, J., Delictual Liability (3rd edn, 2004), 105–12Google Scholar

Walker, D. M., Civil Remedies (1974)Google Scholar

Aguilera Vaqués, M., ‘Soil Pollution and Decontamination in Spain’, European Environmental Law Review, 2002, 174–85

García, Alenza J. F., Manual de Derecho ambiental (2001)Google Scholar

Álvarez Lata, N., ‘La responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente’, in Reglero Campos, L. F. (coord.), Tratado de responsabilidad civil (2nd edn, 2003), 1701–57Google Scholar

Salazar, Arbues J. J., and Bernad, Labrador J., El seguro de responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente: el pool español de riesgos medioambientales (1998)Google Scholar

Asúa González, C. I., ‘La responsabilidad’, in Ferriol, Puig L.et al., Manual de Derecho Civil, II (3rd edn, 2000), 467–522Google Scholar

Auger Liñán, C., ‘Problemática de la responsabilidad civil en materia ambiental’, Poder Judicial, 1988 Especial IV, 111–23

Ballester Cecilia, R., ‘Responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente’, in Rubio, Ayús y M. A., Cecilia, Ballester R., and Llenes, Crespo A., Apuntes de Derecho Medioambiental (1996), 111–31Google Scholar

Doménech, Barceló J., Responsabilidad extracontractual del empresario por actividades de sus dependientes (1995)Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Betancor A., Instituciones de Derecho ambiental (2001)Google Scholar

Bishop, W., ‘Economic Loss in Tort’, Oxford J. Legal Stud. 2 (1982) 1–29CrossRef

Blasco Esteve, A., ‘Medio ambiente y responsabilidad’, in Pardo, Esteve J., Derecho del medio ambiente y Administración local (1996), 629–47Google Scholar

Bussani, M., and Palmer V. P., ‘Liability for Pure Financial Loss in Europe: An Economic Restatement’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003) 113–62CrossRef

Busto Lago, J. M., ‘Pago de “indemnizaciones” por el Estado español a los afectados por el siniestro del Prestige y renuncia de acciones’, Revista Práctica Derecho de daños, 2004, No. 18, 6–14

Sánchez, Cabanillas A., La reparación de los daños al medio ambiente (1996)Google Scholar

Cabanillas Sánchez, A.,‘La responsabilidad por inmisiones industriales’, Anuario de Derecho Civil, 1993, 1957–94

Sánchez, Cabanillas A.,‘La responsabilidad por daños ambientales según la jurisprudencia civil’, in Área de Derecho civil de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Zaragoza, Estudios de Derecho civil en homenaje al Profesor Dr José Luis Lacruz Berdejo, I (1992), 191–218Google Scholar

Laporta, Caffarena J., in Comentario del Código Civil, II (Ministerio de Justicia, 1991)Google Scholar

Eritja, Campins M., La gestión de los residuos peligrosos en la Comunidad Europea (1994)Google Scholar

Carcaba, M., ‘Defensa civil del medio ambiente’, Revista de Derecho Urbaństico y Medio Ambiente, 1999, No. 171, 141–83

Carrillo Donaire, J. A., and Galán Vioque, R., ‘Hacia un derecho fundamental a un medio ambiente adecuado?’, Revista Española de Derecho Administrativo, 1995, 271–85

CastilloDaudí, M., ‘La responsabilidad civil por daños de contaminación por hidrocarburos y el siniestro del buque Aegean Sea’, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 1998, 69–90

Cavanillas Múgica, S. ‘Comentario a la Sentencia de 11.3.1988’, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil, 17/1988, 379–88

Cordero Lobato, E., ‘La liquidación de daños entre particulares en el procedimiento administrativo’, InDret, 2/2003 (www.indret.com)

Cordero Lobato, E.,‘Derecho de daños y medio ambiente’, in Álvarez, Ortega L., Lecciones de Derecho del medio ambiente (2nd edn, 2000), 433–60Google Scholar

Hernández, Crespo A., La responsabilidad civil derivada de la contaminación transfronteriza ante la jurisdicción estatal (1999)Google Scholar

Gardella, Darnaculleta i M., Recursos naturales y dominio público: el nuevo régimen de demanio natural (2000)Google Scholar

De Ángel Yágüez, R., ‘Actuación dañosa de los grupos’, Revista Jurídica de Catalunya, 1997, 975–1003

Yágüez, Ángel R.,Tratado de Responsabilidad Civil (1993)Google Scholar

De Ángel Yágüez, R.,‘La responsabilidad por los desastres ecológicos. Reflexiones de carácter general’, Boletín de Información del Ministerio de Justicia, 1991, 2773–8 and 2889–903

Perales, Miguel C., Derecho español del medio ambiente (2nd edn, 2002)Google Scholar

Perales, Miguel C.,‘La responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente’, in SEAIDA, Estudios sobre la responsabilidad civil medioambiental y su aseguramiento (1997), 63–97Google Scholar

Perales, Miguel C.,La responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente (2nd edn, 1997)Google Scholar

Del Olmo García, P., and Pintos Ager, J., ‘Responsabilidad civil por vertido de hidrocarburos. Quiénes deberían pagar los daños causados por el Prestige?’, InDret, 2003/1 (www.indret.com)

Brito, Díaz F. J., El límite de tolerancia en las inmisiones y relaciones de vecindad (1999)Google Scholar

García-Alcalá, Díaz-Regañón C., ‘Comentario a la Sentencia de 22.1.1996’, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil (legal journal), 41/1996, p. 724Google Scholar

Díaz Romero, M. del R., ‘La acción negatoria frente a inmisiones en el derecho de propiedad’, in Cabanillas, A.et al., Estudios jurídicos en homenaje al Profesor Luis Díez-Picazo, III (2003), 3699–719Google Scholar

Romero, Díaz M. del R.,La protección jurídico-civil de la propiedad frente a las inmisiones (2003)Google Scholar

Díez-Picazo Giménez, G., ‘Responsabilidad civil ambiental’, in Noguera, Vercher A., Jiménez, Díez-Picazo G., and Valle, Castañón del M., Responsabilidad ambiental penal, civil y administrativa (2003), 89–123Google Scholar

Giménez, Díez-Picazo G.,‘¿Es oportuno elaborar una Ley de responsabilidad medioambiental?’, La Ley, 1998-I, 1889–906Google Scholar

León, Díez-Picazo y Ponce L., ‘La culpa en la responsabilidad civil extracontractual’, Anuario de Derecho Civil, 2001, 1009–27Google Scholar

León, Díez-Picazo y Ponce L.,Derecho de daños (1999)Google Scholar

Egea Fernández, J., ‘Relaciones de vecindad, desarrollo industrial y medio ambiente’, in Pardo, Esteve J., Derecho del medio ambiente y Administración local (1996), 63–97Google Scholar

Fernández, Egea J.,Acción negatoria, inmisiones y defensa de la propiedad (1994)Google Scholar

Pardo, Esteve J., ‘La protección de la ignorancia. Exclusión de responsabilidad por los riesgos desconocidos’, Revista de Administración Pública (legal journal), 2003, No. 161, 53–82Google Scholar

Pardo, Esteve J.,Realidad y perspectivas de la ordenación jurídica de los montes (1995)Google Scholar

Esteve Pardo, J.,‘La protección de la fauna: el caso de los llamados animales dañinos’, in Morant, Gómez-Ferrer R. (coord.), Libro homenaje al Profesor José Luis Villar Palasí (1989), 369–86Google Scholar

Gómez, Fach K., La contaminación transfronteriza en Derecho internacional privado. Estudio de Derecho aplicable (2002)Google Scholar

Urzainqui, Fernández F. J., La tutela civil frente al ruido (2003)Google Scholar

Führ, M., Gebers, B., Ormond, T., and Roller, G., ‘Access to Justice: Legal Standing for Environmental Associations in the European Union’, in Robinson, D., and Dunkley, J. (eds.), Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law (1995), 72–107Google Scholar

Gálvez Montés, J., in Falla, Garrido F. (ed.), Comentarios a la Constitución (3rd edn, 2001), 915–19Google Scholar

Cobaleda, García M., ‘Libro Blanco sobre responsabilidad civil ambiental’, Revista Mensual de Gestión Ambiental, 19/2000, 14–20Google Scholar

Rubio, García M. P., ‘Los daños causados por el Prestige. Un largo y tortuoso camino en el logro de su reparación’, Revista Práctica de Derecho de Daños, No. 24, 2005, 5–27Google Scholar

García Rubio, M. P.‘A indemnización dos danos causados polo Prestige’, in Feijó, Torres E. J. (ed.), Prestige: a catástrofe que despertou a Galiza? (2003), 113–39Google Scholar

Rubio, García M. P.,‘El caso Prestige un año después de la tragedia. Algunos apuntes en torno al Real Decreto Ley 4/2003, de 20 de junio’, La Ley, 2003, 1812–17Google Scholar

García Rubio, M. P., and Lete, J., ‘Spain’, in Koziol, H., and Steininger, B. (eds.), European Tort Law 2001 (2002), 417–41Google Scholar

Gil-Delgado, Gil-Robles J., ‘La acción judicial popular y la audiencia de los interesados en el área del Derecho ambiental’, Poder Judicial, 1988 Especial IV, 167–77Google Scholar

Gil Rodríguez, J., ‘La pluralidad de sujetos’, in Ferriol, Puig L.et al., Manual de Derecho Civil, II (3rd edn, 2000), 307–13Google Scholar

Pomar, Gómez F., ‘La responsabilidad civil como instrumento de protección del medio ambiente’, Iuris, 1999, No. 30, 40–4Google Scholar

Pomar, Gómez F.,‘El papel de la responsabilidad civil en la protección del medio ambiente: una valoración crítica’, Iniuria, 8/1995, 13–55Google Scholar

Pomar, Gómez F.,La responsabilidad por daño ecológico: ventajas, costes y alternativas (1995)Google Scholar

Gómez Pomar, F., and Ruiz García, J. A., ‘La noción de daño puramente económico: Una visión crítica desde el análisis económico del derecho’, InDret, 4/2002 (www.indret.com)

Catalá, Gomis L., Responsabilidad por daños al medio ambiente (1998)Google Scholar

Castillo, Gutiérrez V. L., ‘Cronología y responsabilidades de una catástrofe’, Iuris, 71/2003, 26–33Google Scholar

Huelin Martínez de Velasco, J., ‘La protección jurisdiccional del medio ambiente’, in Ibáñez, Requero J. L., Protección administrativa del medio ambiente (1994), 207–33Google Scholar

Huerta, Huerta R., and Fuente, Huerta Izar C., Tratado de Derecho ambiental II (2000)Google Scholar

Quesada, Jimena L., and Mallén, Tomás B. S., ‘El derecho al medio ambiente en el marco del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos’, Revista General de Derecho (legal journal), 618, 1996, 2135–60Google Scholar

Fraga, Jordano J., ‘Responsabilidad civil por daños al medio ambiente ex delito ecológico: última jurisprudencia y algunas reflexiones’, in Asociación de Derecho Ambiental Español, III Congreso Nacional de Derecho Ambiental (2000), 23–45Google Scholar

Fraga, Jordano J.,La protección del derecho a un medio ambiente adecuado (1995)Google Scholar

Moreno, Junceda J., ‘Sobre la contaminación del suelo’, Revista de Administración Pública (legal journal), 2002, 412–43Google Scholar

Lange, H., and Schiemann, G., Schadenersatz (3rd edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Larenz, K., Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts I, Allgemeiner Teil (14th edn, 1987)Google Scholar

Pombo, Llamas E., ‘Chapapote y responsabilidad civil’, Diario de noticias La Ley ‘Especial responsabilidad civil’ abril 2003, 7Google Scholar

Pombo, Llamas E.,La responsabilidad civil del médico (1988)Google Scholar

Aznar, Lorente C. J., Empresa, Derecho y medio ambiente. La responsabilidad legal empresarial por daños al medio ambiente (1996)Google Scholar

Cutanda, Lozano B., Derecho ambiental administrativo (2000)Google Scholar

Fernández, Lucas F., in Albaladejo, M. (dir.), Comentarios al Código Civil y Compilaciones Forales XX-2 (1986)Google Scholar

Castillo, Macías A., El daño causado por el ruido y otras inmisiones (2004)Google Scholar

López, Marín J. J., Daños por productos: estado de la cuestión (2001)Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., ‘Hacia un baremo europeo para la indemnización de los daños corporales? Consideraciones generales sobre el Proyecto Busnelli-Lucas’, http://civil.udg.es/cordoba/pon/martin.htm (Date: 1 March 2004)

‘An Outline of the Spanish Legal Tariffication Scheme for Personal Injury Resulting from Traffic Accidents’, in Koziol, H., and Spier, J. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Pierre Widmer (2003), 235–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., and Ribot, J., ‘Compensation for Pure Economic Loss under Spanish Law’, in Boom, W. H., Koziol, H., and Witting, C. (eds.), Pure Economic Loss (2004), 62–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., and Ribot, J.,‘La responsabilidad objetiva: supuestos especiales versus cláusula general’, in Lapuente, Cámara S. (ed.), Derecho privado europeo (2003), 827–56Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., and Ribot, J.,‘“Pure Economic Loss”: La indemnización de los daños patrimoniales puros’, in Lapuente, Cámara S. (ed.), Derecho privado europeo (2003), 883–920Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., Ribot, J., and Solé Feliu, J., ‘Compensation for Personal Injury in Spain’, in Koch, B. A., and Koziol, H. (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003), 238–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., Ribot, J., and Solé Feliu, J.,‘Spain’, in Koch, B. A., and Koziol, H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability (2002), 281–321Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., Ribot, J., and Solé Feliu, J.,‘Non-Pecuniary Loss under Spanish Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (2001), 192–243CrossRef Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., Ribot, J., and Solé Feliu, J.,‘Tort Law’ (chapter of a book on Spanish law, unpublished)

Casals, Martín M., and Ruda, A., ‘Comentario a la Sentencia de 26 de noviembre de 2003’, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil, 2004, No. 65, 843–59Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M., and Solé Feliu, J., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under Spanish Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Multiple Tortfeasors (2004), 189–213Google Scholar

Martín Casals, M.,‘Defectos que dañan. Daños causados por productos defectuosos’, InDret, 1/2000 (www. indret.com)

Martín Casals, M., Solé Feliu, J., and Seuba Torreblanca, J. C., ‘Spain’, in Dute, J., Faure, M. G., and Koziol, H. (eds.), Liability for and Insurability of Biomedical Research with Human Subjects in a Comparative Perspective (2004), 264–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Vázquez de Castro, Martínez L., ‘La protección civil del medio ambiente’, Actualidad Civil, 2000, 17–34Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Maseda J., ‘O caso do buque Mar Egeo’, Revista Xurídica Galega, 1998–1, 339–56Google Scholar

Ruiz, Mellado L., ‘Aspectos jurídico-administrativos de la Biotecnología’, Documentación Administrativa 2003, 267–317Google Scholar

Mir Puigpelat, O., ‘La jurisdicción competente en materia de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administración: una polémica que no cesa’, InDret, 2002/3 (www.indret.com)

Trujillo, Moreno E., ‘La responsabilidad civil por deterioro del medio ambiente’, in Gómez Orfanel, G., Derecho del medio ambiente (1995), 47–70Google Scholar

Trujillo, Moreno E.,La protección jurídico-privada del medio ambiente y la responsabilidad por su deterioro (1991)Google Scholar

Mendizábal, Navarro I. A., ‘La responsabilidad civil y el Prestige’, Revista General de Legislación y Jurisprudencia (legal journal), 2002–4, 595–615Google Scholar

Martín, Nieto F., ‘Quien contamina, paga. El caso Prestige’, La Ley, 2003, No. 5712, 1Google Scholar

Navarro, Ortolá S., ‘Naturaleza y fijación del canon por vertimiento de residuos nocivos a la riqueza piscícola de las aguas públicas’, RAP, 1963, No. 40, 251–79Google Scholar

Pantaleón, F., in Comentario del Código Civil, II (Ministerio de Justicia, 1991)Google Scholar

Lucán, Parra M. A., La protección al medio ambiente. Orientaciones de la jurisprudencia civil (1992)Google Scholar

Lucán, Parra M. A.,‘Responsabilidad de los daños producidos como consecuencia de la contaminación de las aguas. Relación de causalidad’, Poder Judicial, 1991, 107–12Google Scholar

Parra Lucán, M. A.,Daños por productos y protección del consumidor (1990)

Zamora, Pavelek E., ‘La cobertura del riesgo medioambiental en las pólizas de responsabilidad civil general’, in SEAIDA, Estudios sobre la responsabilidad civil medioambiental y su aseguramiento (1997), 195–255Google Scholar

Plaza, C., ‘Spain’, in Somsen, H. (ed.), The Yearbook of European Environmental Law, I (2000), 522Google Scholar

Gómez, Poveda P., and Cobos, Vázquez C., ‘La reparación de los daños ambientales. Estudio comparativo entre el Anteproyecto de Ley de responsabilidad civil derivada de actividades con incidencia ambiental y el Libro Blanco de la Comisión Europea sobre reparación medioambiental’, Noticias de la Unión Europea, 2001, No. 193, 59–72Google Scholar

Poveda Gómez, P., and Vázquez Cobos, C.,‘La reparación de los daños ambientales mediante instrumentos de responsabilidad civil’, Información de Medio Ambiente No. 68, 2

Pérez, Pozuelo L., ‘La reparación del daño al medio ambiente’, Revista de Derecho Urbanístico y Medio Ambiente (legal journal), 2002, 133–66Google Scholar

Ramos, Rams L., ‘El reparto competencial en los casos de catástrofes marítimas por vertido de hidrocarburos: el caso del “Prestige”’, Revista General de Legislación y Jurisprudencia (legal journal), 2002, 617–41Google Scholar

Campos, Reglero L. F. (coord.), Tratado de responsabilidad civil (2nd edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Campos, Reglero L. F.‘Comentario a la sentencia de 23 de septiembre de 1988’, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil (legal journal), 1988, No. 18, 850–61Google Scholar

Ibáñez, Requero J. L., Protección administrativa del medio ambiente (1994)Google Scholar

López, Reyes M. J. (coord.), Derecho ambiental español (2001)Google Scholar

Ribot, J., and Ruda, A., ‘Spain’, in Koziol, H., and Steininger, B. S. (eds.), European Tort Law 2003 (2004), 383–409CrossRef Google Scholar

Rivero Hernández, F., in Lacruz, J. L., Elementos de Derecho Civil. Derecho de Obligaciones, II-2, Contratos y cuasicontratos. Delito y cuasidelito (2nd edn, 2002)

Trías, Roca E., Derecho de Daños (4th edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Docampo, Rodríguez M. J., La obligación de indemnizar del propietario del buque-tanque (2003)Google Scholar

Gayán, Rodríguez E. M., ‘Claves de Derecho privado en el asunto Prestige’, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional (legal journal), 2003, 117–47Google Scholar

Guitián, Rodríguez A. M., ‘Breve reflexión sobre la responsabilidad civil extracontractual del propietario no conductor en la Ley 30/1995, de 8 de noviembre, de ordenación y supervisión de los seguros privados’, La Ley, 2000, 1534–9Google Scholar

Vide, Rogel C., ‘Comentario a la STS de 14 de marzo de 1978’, Anuario de Derecho Civil (legal journal), 1979-I, 267–80Google Scholar

Rubí i Puig, A., and Piñeiro i Salguero, J., ‘El blindaje del Gobierno en la crisis del “Prestige”. Comentario al Real Decreto Ley 4/2003, de 20 de junio, de ayudas a los damnificados’, InDret, 3/2003 (www.indret.com)

Ruda, A., ‘Comentario a la Sentencia de 28 de enero de 2004’, Cuadernos Civitas de Jurisprudencia Civil (legal journal), vol. 66, 2004, 1077–106Google Scholar

Ruda, A.,‘Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and others, Fox v. Spousal (Midlands) Ltd, Matthews v. Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Ltd and others [2002] House of Lords 22: Spanish case note’, European Review of Private Law, 2004/2, 245–58Google Scholar

Ruda, A.,‘Problemas de identificación del causante del daño y responsabilidad por cuota de mercado’, Revista Práctica de Derecho de daños, 2004, No. 19, 5–20Google Scholar

Ruda, A.,‘Entre todo y nada. Una visión crítica de la responsabilidad por cuota de mercado’, Revista de la Asociación Española de Abogados Especializados en Responsabilidad Civil y Seguro, 2003, No. 5, 13–29Google Scholar

Ruda, A.,‘La responsabilidad por cuota de mercado a juicio’, InDret, 03/2003 (www. indret.com)

Ruda, A.,‘La tipología de los daños causados por el Prestige’, in Rubio, García M. P. (dir.), La responsabilidad por los daños causados por el hundimiento del Prestige (Madrid, 2007)

Salvador Coderch, P., ‘Causalidad y responsabilidad’, InDret, 03/2002 (www.indret.com)

Sánchez Aristi, R., in Bercovitz, R. (coord.), Comentarios al Código Civil (2001)Google Scholar

González, Sánchez-Friera M. del C., La responsabilidad civil del empresario por deterioro del medio ambiente (1994)Google Scholar

Sanchis Moreno, F., ‘Spain’, in Hallo, R. E., Access to Environmental Information in Europe: The Implementation and Implications of Directive 90/313/EEC (1996), 225–48Google Scholar

Briz, Santos J., La responsabilidad civil. Temas actuales (2001)Google Scholar

Briz, Santos J.La responsabilidad civil. Derecho sustantivo y Derecho procesal (6th edn, 1991)Google Scholar

Santos Morón, M. J., ‘Acerca de la tutela civil del medio ambiente: algunas reflexiones críticas’, in Cabanillas, A., et al., Estudios jurídicos en homenaje al Profesor Luis Díez-Picazo, II (2003), 3015–37Google Scholar

Rubiales, Sanz I., ‘Régimen jurídico administrativo de la restauración de suelos contaminados en el ordenamiento español’, Revista de Derecho Urbanístico y Medio Ambiente (legal journal), 2003, 1498–535Google Scholar

Gómez, Serrano E., ‘La protección medioambiental’, Actualidad Civil, 2001, 273–301Google Scholar

Serrano Lozano, R., ‘Régimen jurídico español de los residuos’, in Álvarez, Ortega L., Lecciones de Derecho del medio ambiente (2nd edn, 2000)Google Scholar

Feliu, Solé J., El concepto de defecto del producto en la responsabilidad civil del fabricante (1997)Google Scholar

Feliu, Solé J.‘La concurrencia de culpa de la víctima en la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Supremo’, Anuario de Derecho Civil (legal journal), 1997, 865–902Google Scholar

Jurado, Vera D. J., La disciplina ambiental de las actividades industriales (1994)Google Scholar

Domingo, Vicente E., Los daños corporales: tipología y valoración (1994)Google Scholar

Perea, Viguri A., ‘La responsabilidad en material medioambiental: el seguro ambiental’, in Comité econòmic i social de la Comunitat Valenciana, V Conferencias sobre el Medio Ambiente. Medio Ambiente y Empresa (2002) (www.ces-cv.es), 25–48Google Scholar

Viguri Perea, A.,‘Las acciones de defensa de intereses colectivos desde la perspectiva del medio ambiente’, in Ruiz-Rico, G. (coord.), Derecho comparado del medio ambiente y de los espacios naturales protegidos (2000), 39–53Google Scholar

Tolsada, Yzquierdo M., Sistema de responsabilidad civil contractual y extracontractual (2001)Google Scholar

Tolsada, Yzquierdo M.,Aspectos civiles del nuevo Código Penal (1997)Google Scholar

Tolsada, Yzquierdo M.,Responsabilidad civil contractual y extracontractual (1993)Google Scholar

Tolsada, Yzquierdo M.,La responsabilidad civil del profesional liberal (1989)Google Scholar

Pulito, Zambonino M., La protección jurídico-administrativa del medio marino: tutela ambiental y transporte marítimo (2001)Google Scholar

Bengtsson, B., Miljöskadelagen och oskrivna skadeståndsgrundsatser, Festskrift till Sveriges Advokatsamfund 1887–1987 (Stockholm, 1987)Google Scholar

Darpö, J., ‘Miljövårdskrav i tiden’, Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift 4–6, 2001, 85 et seq.Google Scholar

Dufwa, B. W., Flera skadeståndsskyldiga (Stockholm, Norstedts, 1993)Google Scholar

Eriksson, A., Rätten till skadestånd vid miljöskador (Stockholm, Norstedts, 1986)Google Scholar

Håstad, T., Negotiorum gestio (Uppsala, Justus, 1962)Google Scholar

Hellner, J., Skadeståndsrätt (6th edn, Stockholm, Norstedts, 2000)Google Scholar

Kleineman, J., ‘Ideell skada eller förmögenhetsförlust’, Journal des Tribunaux 1995/96, 101Google Scholar

Larsson, M.-L., The Law of Environmental Damage – Liability and Reparation (Kluwer Law International, 1999)Google Scholar

Lindblom, P. H., Miljöprocess (Uppsala, Justus, Del I, 2001, and Del II, 2002)

Ljungman, C., Om skada och olägenhet från grannfastighet (Uppsala, Justus, 1943)Google Scholar

Schalling, K., Transportförsäkring (Stockholm, 1986)Google Scholar