Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:52:53.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Transforming Governance to Enhance Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Edited by
Jacob Torfing  and
Peter Triantafillou
Jacob Torfing
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Peter Triantafillou
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance , pp. 215 - 339
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adler, P. S. and Borys, B. 1996. ‘Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive’, Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, M. and Hage, J. 1971. ‘The organic organization and innovation’, Sociology 5: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrow, M. 1970. Bureaucracy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A. and Barney, J. B. 2007. ‘Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1: 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., Young, S. L. and Woolley, J. L. 2015. ‘Opportunities and institutions: A co-creation story of the king crab industry’, Journal of Business Venturing 30: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. and Boyne, G. 2011. ‘Corporate capacity and public service performance’, Public Administration 89: 894–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, T. and Nelson, R. E. 2005. ‘Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage’, Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 329–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bason, C. 2010. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Feeney, M. K. 2011. Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. 1979 The Management of Innovation, 2nd edition. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Caiden, G. E. 1991. ‘What really is public maladministration?’ Public Administration Review 51: 486–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., Lie, A. and Laegreid, P. 2008. ‘Beyond New Public Management: Agencification and regulatory reform in Norway’, Financial Accountability & Management 24: 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1991. ‘Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators’, The Academy of Management Journal 34: 555–90.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1996. ‘Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: Effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics’, The Journal of High Technology Management Research 7: 149–73.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P. 2015. ‘Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization’, Journal of Business Venturing 30: 674–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V. and Tummers, L. 2016. ‘Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda’, Public Administration 94(1, March): 146–66,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L. 2009. ‘Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 361–84.Google Scholar
Delbecq, A. L. and Pierce, J. L. 1978. ‘Innovation in professional organizations’, Administration in Social Work 2: 411–24.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., 2002. ‘Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review’, The Journal of Human Resources 37: 696–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L. 1999. The Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory. Studying Organizations: Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Downs, G. W. and Mohr, L. B. 1976. ‘Conceptual issues in the study of innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 700–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Gay, P. 2007. Hyldest til bureaukratiet: Weber, organisation, etik. Copenhagen, DK: Hans Reitzel Publishers.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P. 1989. ‘The architecture of the British central state, part I: Framework for analysis’, Public Administration 67: 249–75.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. 2003. ‘Opportunities and entrepreneurship’, Journal of Management 29: 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A. 2013. ‘Response to the commentaries: The individual-opportunity (IO) nexus integrates objective and subjective aspects of entrepreneurship’, Academy of Management Review 38: 160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, W. D. and Singh, S. K. 2009. The Public Innovator’s Playbook: Nurturing Bold Ideas in Government. Deloitte.Google Scholar
Fernandez, S. and Wise, L. R. 2010. ‘An exploration of why public organizations “ingest” innovations’, Public Administration 88: 979–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiet, J. O., Norton, W. I. and Clouse, V. G. H. 2013. ‘Search and discovery by repeatedly successful entrepreneurs’, International Small Business Journal 31: 890–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R. and Karnøe, P. 2003. ‘Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship’, Research Policy 32: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodsell, C. T. 2004. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic, 4th edition. Washington DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar
Hage, J. T. 1999.‘Organizational innovation and organizational change’, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 597–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. H. 1963. ‘The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment’, American Journal of Sociology 69(1): 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, T. H. 1993. ‘Toward a general theory of hierarchy: Books, bureaucrats, basketball tournaments, and the administrative structure of the nation-state’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3: 120–45.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2013.‘Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship’, Public Administration Review 73: 821–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons?’ Public Administration 69: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, F. and Hage, J. 1982. ‘Organizing for innovation: Beyond burns and stalker’s organic type’, Sociology 16: 564–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, P. W., Joyce, P. G. and Donahue, A. K. 2003. Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. L. F. 2013. ‘Bureaukrati: ven eller fjende af (offentlig sektor) innovation?’ Politica 45: 250–66.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, M. L. F. and Mortensen, P. B. 2016. ‘Rules and the doctrine of performance management’, Public Administration Review 76: 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaskyte, K. 2011. ‘Predictors of administrative and technological innovations in nonprofit organizations’, Public Administration Review 71: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberly, J. R. and Evanisko, M. J. 1981. ‘Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations’, Academy of Management Journal, 24: 689–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, S. 2013. ‘It’s really out there: A review of the critique of the discovery view of opportunities’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 19: 130–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, S., Berglund, H., Thrane, C. and Blenker, P. 2015. ‘A tale of two Kirzners: Time, uncertainty and the “nature” of opportunities’, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. Epub ahead of print 12 February. DOI: 10.1111/ etap.12151.Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S. and Shepherd, D. A. 2006.‘Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur’, Academy of Management Review 31: 132–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, M. F., Jacobsen, C. B. and Andersen, L. B. 2015. ‘Managing employee motivation: Exploring the connections between managers’ enforcement of command systems, employee perceptions, and employee intrinsic motivation’, International Public Management Journal 1 early view (accepted author version).Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1980. ‘Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design’, Management Science 26: 322–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauta, F. and Kausbergen, P. 2009. ‘OECD literature review. Public sector innovation’, Lectoraat Innovatie Rapport, https://hbo-kennisbank.nl/en/record/oai:repository.samenmaken.nl:smpid:15206.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. 1974. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. 1997. ‘Implementing public innovations in network settings’, Administration & Society 29: 115–38.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. 1993. ‘Reinventing government’, Public Productivity & Management Review, 16 (‘Fiscal Pressures and Productive Solutions: Proceedings of the Fifth National Public Sector Productivity Conference’): 349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, C. N. 1960. Parkinsons lov eller stræben efter fremgang, 8th edition. Copenhagen, DK: Fremad.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. ‘Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency’, Academy of Management Review 26: 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. 2008. Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. 1994. ‘Games real actors could play positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. 1994. ‘Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace’, Academy of Management Journal 37: 580–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S. 2000. ‘Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities’, Organization Science 11: 448–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S. 2003. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2000. ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, Academy of Management Review 25: 217–26.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2011. ‘Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector’, Administration & Society 43: 842–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinosa, C., Flores, F. and Dreyfus, H. L. 1997. Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. 1991. ‘The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, V. A. 1965. ‘Bureaucracy and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 10 (Special Issue on Professionals in Organizations): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. 2011. ‘Teorier om offentlig administration og styring: Fra stillestående bureaukrati til samarbejdsdrevet innovation’, in Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (eds.), Samarbejdsdrevet innovation i den offentlige sektor (Vol. 1.). DJØF Publishers, pp. 117–36.Google Scholar
van der Voet, J. 2015.‘Change leadership and public sector organizational change: examining the interactions of transformational leadership style and red tape’, The American Review of Public Administration, OnlineFirst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N. and Forster, W. R. 2012. ‘Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial’, Academy of Management Review 37: 21–33.Google Scholar
Walker, R. M. 2008. ‘An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. 2014. ‘Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: A review and extension’, Public Management Review 16: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, E. J. 2005. ‘The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber’s model of bureaucratic control’, Organization Studies 26: 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1971. Makt og byråkrati: Essays om politikk og klasse, samfunnsforskning og verdier. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., Ongaro, E. and Van Thiel, S. 2014. ‘Innovation-oriented culture in the public sector: Do managerial autonomy and result control lead to innovation?’ Public Management Review 16: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R. and Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zornoza, C. C., Boronat Navarro, M. and Cipres, M. S. 2007. ‘A meta-analysis of organizational innovation’, in Saee, J. (ed.), Contemporary Corporate Strategy – Global Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar

References

Alexy, O. and Leitner, M. 2011. ‘A fistful of dollars: Are financial rewards a suitable management practice for distributed models of innovation?’ European Management Review 8(3): 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A. and Grossman, B. S. 1986. ‘Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(1): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, L. B. and Pallesen, T. 2008. ‘ “Not Just for the Money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions’, International Public Management Journal 11(1): 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M., Oldham, G. R. and Cummings, A. 2003. ‘Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter?’ The Leadership Quarterly 14(4): 569–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellé, N. 2014. ‘Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation’, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 24(1): 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, A. M. 2006. ‘Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the U.S. internal revenue service’, International Public Management Journal 9(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borins, S. 2001. ‘Encouraging innovation in the public sector’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Crow, M. 1991. ‘Red tape and technology transfer success in government laboratories’, Journal of Technology Transfer 16(2): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Kingsley, G. 1998. ‘Risk culture in public and private organizations’, Public Administration Review 58(2): 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bysted, R. and Jespersen, K. R. 2014. ‘Exploring managerial mechanisms that influence innovative work behaviour: Comparing private and public employees’, Public Management Review 16(2): 217–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadwallader, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J. and Ostrom, A. L. 2010. ‘Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38(2): 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, I., Hall, B. H., Powell, W. and Trajtenberg, M. 2005. Patent Data Project – NSF Proposal. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/papers/CHPT_NSF_%20litreview_updated.pdf, accessed 10 May 2013.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1991. ‘Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators’, Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. 2009. ‘Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S. 2005. ‘Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(1): 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L. 2009. ‘Green Tape: A Theory of Effective Organizational Rules’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(2): 361–84.Google Scholar
Ederer, F. and Manso, G. 2013. ‘Is pay-for-performance detrimental to innovation?’ Management Science 59(7): 1496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R. and Armeli, S. 1997. ‘Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(3): 652–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, B. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham & Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B. and Jegen, R. 2001. ‘Motivation crowding theory’, Journal of Economic Surveys 15(5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgellis, Y., Iossa, E. and Tabvuma, V. 2011. ‘Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. 1962. ‘The influence of strength of drive on functional fixedness and perceptual recognition’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(1): 36–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gumusluoglu, L. and Ilsev, A. 2009. ‘Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation’, Journal of Business Research 62(4): 461–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmaas, T.H., Kjerstad, E., Lurås, H. and Straume, O. R. 2010. ‘Does monetary punishment crowd out pro-social motivation? A natural experiment on hospital length of stay’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 75(2): 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B. 2012. Management Interventions and Motivation Crowding Effects in Public Service Provision. Aarhus: Politica.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B. and Andersen, L. B. 2014a. ‘Performance management in the public sector: Does it decrease or increase innovation and performance?’ International Journal of Public Administration 37(14): 1011–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B. and Andersen, L. B. 2014b. ‘Performance management for academic researchers: How publication command systems affect individual behavior’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 34(2): 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B., Hvitved, J. and Andersen, L. B. 2014. ‘Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation’, Public Administration 92(4): 790–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. L. F. 2013. ‘Bureaukrati: ven eller fjende af (offentlig sektor) innovation?’ Politica 45(3): 250–66.Google Scholar
Jaskyte, K. 2011. ‘Predictors of administrative and technological innovations in nonprofit organizations’, Public Administration Review 71(1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogsgaard, J. A., Thomsen, P. and Andersen, L. B. 2014. ‘Only if we agree? How value conflict moderates the relationship between transformational leadership and public service motivation’, International Journal of Public Administration 37(12): 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. 2003. Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J. 2010. ‘Knights and knaves return: Public service motivation and the delivery of public services’, International Public Management Journal 13(1): 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Manso, G. 2011. ‘Motivating innovation’, The Journal of Finance 66(5): 1823–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, M. F., Andersen, L. B. and Jacobsen, C. B. 2015. ‘Managing employee motivation: Exploring the connections between managers’ enforcement actions, employee perceptions, and employee intrinsic motivation’, International Public Management Journal. Accepted author version posted online: 16 July 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1043166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, M. J. and Bretschneiber, S. 2002. ‘Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, P. 2013. ‘Patents and innovation: Evidence from economic history’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation’, Public Administration Review 67(1): 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K. and Wright, B. E. 2012. ‘Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1): 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Bretschneider, S. 1997. ‘The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7(1): 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. and Hondeghem, A. 2008. ‘Directions for future theory and research’, in Perry, J. L. and Hondeghem, A. (eds.), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, J. and Kastelle, T. 2010. ‘Public sector innovation research: What’s next?’ Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 12(2): 122–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. 2011. ‘The use of innovation awards in the public sector: Individual and organizational perspectives’, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 13(2): 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. and Deci, E. 2000. ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions’, Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauermann, H. and Cohen, W. M. 2010. ‘What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation’, Management Science 56(12): 2134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F. M. 1965. ‘Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions’, American Economic Review 55(5):1097–125.Google Scholar
Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scott, P. G. and Pandey, S. K. 2005. ‘Red tape and public service motivation: Findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 25(2): 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehested, K., Sørensen, E., Schultz Larsen, T. and Hedensted Lund, D. 2010. ‘Barrierer og drivkræfter for samarbejdsdreven innovation: Resultater fra et ekspertpanel (Delphi-studie)’, Working Paper. Roskilde: Roskilde University http://rudar.ruc.dk//bitstream/1800/6266/1/Working_paper_no._3_Delphi_rapport_1_.pdf, accessed 4 February 2014.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2011. ‘Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector’, Administration & Society 43(8): 842–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. and Ansell, C. 2014. ‘Collaboration and design: New tools for public innovation’, in Torfing, J. and Ansell, C. (eds.), Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. L. and Clegg, C. W. 2010. ‘Why do employees undertake creative action?’ Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83(1): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2013. ‘Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders’, Public Administration Review 73(4): 553–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. 2008. ‘An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, A., Rost, K. and Osterloh, M. 2010. ‘Pay for performance in the public sector: Benefits and (hidden) costs’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, E. W. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘E-government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(3): 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. and Bartol, K. M. 2010. ‘Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement’, Academy of Management Journal 53(1): 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoghi, C., Mohr, R. D. and Meyer, P. B. 2010. ‘Workplace organization and innovation’, Canadian Journal of Economics 43(2): 622–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Albury, D. 2005. ‘Fostering innovation in public services’, Public Money & Management 25(1): 51–6.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S. and Baker, B. 2014. ‘E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission’, Leadership Quarterly 25(1): 105–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bason, C. 2010. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., Pache, A. and Alexander, J. 2010. ‘Leadership competencies for implementing planned organization change’, Leadership Quarterly 21(3): 422–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. 1985. Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Boal, K. B. and Hoojiberg, R. 2001. ‘Strategic leadership research: Moving on’, Leadership Quarterly 11(4): 515–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borins, S. 2000. ‘Loose cannons and rule breakers? Some evidence about innovative public managers’, Public Administration Review 60(6): 498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borins, S. 2002. ‘Leadership and innovation in the public sector’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 23(8): 467–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. M. 2003. ‘Technology diffusion and knowledge barrier: The dilemma of stakeholder participation’, Public Performance and Management Review 26(4): 345–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, J. M., and Crosby, B. C. 1992. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Problems in a Shared-Power World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cayer, N. J., Baker, D. and Weschler, L. F. 2010. Social Change and Adaptive Management. San Diego: Birkdale Publishers.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. 2009. ‘Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, J. W. and Hargrove, E. C. 1987. Leadership and Innovation: A Biographical Perspective on Entrepreneurs in Government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fernandez, S. and Rainey, H. G. 2006. ‘Managing successful organizational change in the public sector’, Public Administration Review 66(2): 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A., and Jick, T. D. 1992. The Challenges of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. K. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Koch, P. and Hauknes, J. 2005. On Innovation in the Public Sector. Publin, NIFU Step: Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. 1990. A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Light, P. 1997. The Tides of Reform: Making Government Work, 1945–1995. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lombardo, M. M. and McCauley, C. D. 1988. The Dynamics of Management Derailment. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, E. E. 1966. ‘Gunfire at sea: A case study of innovation’, in Morison, E. E. (ed.), Men, Machines, and Modern Times. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
Naveh, E., Meilich, O. and Marcus, A. 2006. ‘The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: An organizational learning approach’, Strategic Organization 4(3): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. 2011. ‘30 years of public management reforms: Has there been a pattern?’ Working Paper, Washington, DC: World Bank, siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTGOVANTICORR/Resources/Politt.doc.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: NPM, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P. 2011. ‘Talking about governance: The role of magic concepts’, Public Management Review 13(5): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. and Johnson, C. 2007. ‘Seasonal cycles in public management: Disaggregation and re-aggregation’, Public Money and Management 27(1): 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichy, N. M. and Devanna, M. A. 1986. The Transformational Leader. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wheatley, M. J. 1992. Leadership and the New Science: Learning About Organizations from an Orderly Universe. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Windrum, P. and Koch, P. M. (eds.) 2008. Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and Management. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. and McKelvey, B. 2007. ‘Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era’, Leadership Quarterly 18: 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 2006. ‘Guide to senior executive service qualifications’, www.opm.gov/ses/references/sesqualsguide2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Wart, M. 1995. ‘The first step in the reinvention process: Assessment’, Public Administration Review 55(5): 429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, M. 1998. Changing Public Sector Values. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2011. Dynamics of Leadership: Theory and Practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2012. Leadership in Public Organizations, 2nd edition. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2015. ‘Evaluating transformational leadership: The challenging case of Eric Shinseki and the VA’, Public Administration Review 75(5): 760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, M., Cayer, J. and Cook, S. 1993. Handbook of Training and Development for the Public Sector: A Comprehensive Resource. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E. 2009. Building Governability and Public Management. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

References

Albury, D. 2005. ‘Fostering innovation in public services’, Public Money & Management 25(1): 51–6. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9302.2005.00450.x.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. and Kagan, R. A. 1982. Going by the Book the Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, P. 2004. ‘The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s’, Social Policy & Administration 38(2): 139–55. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9515.2004.00382.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, J. 2013. ‘Who’s afraid of peer review?’ Science 342(6154): 60–5. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouckaert, G. and Peters, B. G. 2002. ‘Performance measurement and management: The Achilles’ heel in administrative modernization’, Public Performance & Management Review 25(4): 359–62.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. 1998. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brodkin, E. Z. 2011. ‘Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(S2): i253–77. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, N., Klein, R. and Day, P. 1992. How Organizations Measure Success. The Use of Performance Indicators in Government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1972. ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1):1–25. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtung, J. and Ruge, M. H. 1965. ‘The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers’, Journal of Peace Research 2 (1):64–90. http://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. 2005. ‘Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present’, Public Money and Management 25(1): 27–34. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9302.2005.00447.x.Google Scholar
Hill, M. and Hupe, P. 2002. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2006. ‘Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services’, Public Administration Review 66(4): 515–21.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and John, P. 2007. ‘Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(4): 567–80.Google Scholar
Jilke, S. and Van de Walle, S. 2012. ‘Two track public services? Citizens’ voice behaviour towards liberalized services in the EU15’, Public Management Review 15(4): 465–76. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.664015.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. and Talbot, C. 2008. ‘UK parliamentary scrutiny of public services agreements: A challenge too far?’, in Van de Walle, S. and Van Dooren, W. (eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 140–57.Google Scholar
Jos, P. H. and Tompkins, M. E. 2004. ‘The accountability paradox in an age of reinvention: The perennial problem of preserving character and judgment’, Administration & Society 36(3): 255–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. 1984. Agenda, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Kroll, A. 2013. ‘The other type of performance information: Nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use’, Public Administration Review 73(2): 265–76. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–6210.2012.02648.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laegreid, P. and Verhoest, K. 2010. ‘Reforming public sector organizations’, in Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.M. and Triantafillou, P. 2014. ‘From performance measurement to learning: a new source of government overload?’ International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (4): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, H.-D., and Benavot, A. 2013. PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. 2013. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary. The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. 2014. ‘The problem at the VA: “Performance perversity” ’, Los Angeles Times (June 1). www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-moynihan-va-scandal-performance-perversity-20140602-story.html.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2008. ‘Meanings of measurement’, Public Management Review 10(2): 221–39. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719030801928672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. 2003. ‘Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity’, Public Administration 81(4): 853–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1993. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. and Brown, K. 2013. Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A. and Jun, S. Y. 2009. ‘Back to the future? performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence’, Public Administration Review 69(1): 39–51. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–6210.2008.01939_2.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. 2013. ‘The logics of performance management’, Evaluation 19(4): 346–63. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013505040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, B. 2009. ‘Competing traditions of governance and dilemmas of administrative accountability: The case of Denmark’, Public Administration 87(1): 117–31. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9299.2008.00727.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, B. A. 2000. ‘The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(1): 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, B. A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rixen, T. 2013. ‘Why reregulation after the crisis is feeble: Shadow banking, offshore financial centers, and jurisdictional competition’, Regulation & Governance 7(4): 435–59. http://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. 2011. The Logic of Discipline: Global Capitalism and the Architecture of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, A. 2003. ‘The performing state: Reflection on an idea whose time has come but whose implementation has not’, OECD Journal on Budgeting 3(2): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillemans, T. and Bovens, M. 2011. ‘The challenge of multiple accountability: Does redundancy lead to overload?’, in Dubnick, M. and Frederickson, G. (eds.), Accountable Governance: Problems and Promises. New York: ME Sharpe, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. K. 2005. ‘Administrative breakdowns in the governmental response to Hurricane Katrina’, Public Administration Review 65(5): 515–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J., Fording, R. and Schram, S. F. 2011. ‘The organization of discipline: From performance management to perversity and punishment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(s2): i203–32. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W. 2006. Performance Measurement in the Flemish Public Sector: A Supply and Demand Approach. Thesis, faculty of social sciences. Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W. 2008. ‘Nothing new under the sun? change and continuity in the twentieth century performance movement’, in Van de Walle, S. and Van Dooren, W. (eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It Is Used. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. 2015. Performance Management in the Public Sector, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dooren, W., Voets, J. and Winters, S. 2015. ‘Autonomy and reregulation: Explaining dynamics in the Flemish social housing sector’, Public Administration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F. L. 2002. ‘The performance paradox in the public sector’, Public Performance & Management Review 25(3): 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, A. and Tymms, P. 2002. ‘Dysfunctional effects of league tables: A comparison between English and Scottish primary schools’, Public Money and Management 22(1): 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, T. and Van Dooren, W. 2011. ‘Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(3):505–30. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311408648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, T. and Van Dooren, W. (2012): ‘Coming to terms with accountability’, Public Management Review 14(7): 1011–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, T. and Van Dooren, W. 2016. ‘(De)Politicization dynamics in public–private partnerships (PPPs): Lessons from a comparison between UK and Flemish PPP policy’, Public Management Review 18(2): 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.969759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Balle Hansen, M. 2010. ‘Brugerinnovation og strategisk ledelse i den offentlige sektor’, (‘User innovation and strategic management in the public sector’), Ledelse & Erhvervsøkonomi 75(1): 41–52.Google Scholar
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J. and Steijn, B. (eds.) 2011. Innovation in the Public Sector. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanor, V. 2010. ‘On forms of accountability’, Working Paper 03. London: 2020 Public Service Trust at the RSA.Google Scholar
Borins, S. 2001. ‘Encouraging innovation in the public sector’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borins, S. 2008. Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition and Replication. Washington: Brooking Institution.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G. and Verhoest, K. 2010. The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. 2007. ‘Analysing and assessing public accountability. A conceptual framework’, European Law Journal 13(4): 837–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., Curtin, D. and t’Hart, P. 2010. The Real World of EU Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. and Schillemans, T. 2014. ‘Meaningful Accountability’, in Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 673–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrkjeflot, H., Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. 2014. ‘The many faces of accountability – comparing reforms in welfare, hospitals and immigration’, Scandinavian Political Studies 37(2): 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L. and Lægreid, P. 2007. ‘Reform of employment and welfare administration – the challenge of coordinating diverse public organizations’, International Review of Administrative Science 73(3): 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L. and Lægreid, P. 2014. ‘Joined-up government for welfare administration reform in Norway’, Public Organization Review 14(4): 439–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. 2002. ‘New Public Management: Puzzles of democracy and the influence of citizens’, Journal of Political Philosophy 10(3): 267–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. 2007. ‘The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform’, Public Administration Review 67(6):1059–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. 2014. ‘Performance and accountability – a theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment’, Public Organization Review 15(2): 207–25.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. and Norman, R. 2007. ‘Organizing immigration – a comparison of New Zealand and Norway’, in Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (eds.), Transcending New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. and Stigen, I. 2006. ‘Performance management and public sector reform: The Norwegian hospital reform’, International Public Management Journal 9(2): 113–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F. 1991. ‘Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators’, Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M. 1984. ‘Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “Organizational lag”’, Administrative Science Quarterly 29(3): 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, P. and Klein, R. 1987. Accountability. Five Public Services. London: Tavistock Publishers.Google Scholar
Dubnick, M. J. 2011. ‘Move over Daniel: We need some “Accountability Space”’, Administration and Society 43(6): 704–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, M. 2012. ‘How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective’, in Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, pp. 157–68.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Mowrey, D. and Nelson, R. (eds.) 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fimreite, A. L. 2011. ‘Partnerskapet i NAV – innovasjon eller “same procedure”?’ (Partnership in NAV – innovation or ‘same procedure’?), Working Paper 4/2011. Bergen: Uni Rokkan Centre.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. 2012. Defending Politics. Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, M. 2014. ‘The future and relevance of accountability studies’, in Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 661–72.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. and Buller, J. 2006. ‘Depolitization, democracy and arena shifting’, in Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (eds.), Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State. Cheltenham: Edvard Elgar, pp. 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, H. G. and Johnston, J. M. 1999. Public Management Reform and Innovations. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2011. ‘Blame avoidance and accountability: Positive, negative or neutral’, in Dubnick, M. J. and Frederickson, H. G. (eds.), Accountable Governance. Problems and Promises. London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 167–79.Google Scholar
Klijn, E. H. 2011. ‘New public management and governance: A comparison’, in Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. and Gill, D. 2011. ‘Towards a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM in New Zealand’, Governance 24(1): 141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lægreid, P., Opedal, S. and Stigen, I. 2005. ‘The Norwegian hospital reform – balancing political control and enterprise autonomy’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30(6): 1035–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G. and Verhoest, K. 2011. ‘Explaining the innovative culture and activity of state agencies’, Organizational Studies 32(10): 1321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malena, C., Forster, R. and Singh, J. 2004. ‘Social accountability’, Social Development Papers no. 40. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mattei, P. 2009. Restructuring Welfare Organizations in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. and Hartley, J. 2008. ‘Innovations in governance’, Public Management Review 10(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, R. 2000. ‘Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’ Public Administration, 78 (3): 555-573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding Power to Account. Accountability in Modern Democracies. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, G. and Albury, D. 2003. Innovation in the Public Sector. London: Cabinet Office, Strategic Unit, Working Paper.Google Scholar
NAO 2006. Achieving Innovation in Central Government Organisations: Detailed Research Findings. London: National Audit Office HC 1447-II, Session 2005-2006.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. 2004. ‘Innovasjon, politikk og institusjonell dynamikk’ (‘Innovation, policy and institutional dynamics’). Working Paper 04/2004. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. 2007. Europe in Search for Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. P. 2014. ‘Accountability and ambiguity’, in Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 106–26.Google Scholar
Opedal, S. 2004. ‘Statens eierstyring av helseforetakene – balansegang mellom stortingsaktivisme og foretaksautonomi’ (‘State owner steering of health enterprises – the balance between parliamentary activism and enterprise autonomy’). Working Paper. Stavanger: IRIS.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. P. (ed.) 2010. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. 2003. ‘Joined-up government: A survey’, Political Studies Review 1: 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. 2011. ‘Innovation in the public sector: An introductory overview’, in Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J. and Steijn, B. (eds.), Innovation in the Public Sector. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P. 2011. ‘Talking about government: The role of magic concepts’, Public Management Review 13(5): 641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusions of Innovations. 5th edition. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Romzek, B. S. 2000. ‘Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 66(1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romzek, B. and Dubnick, M. 1987. ‘Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy’, Public Administration Review 47(3): 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillemans, T. 2013. ‘The public accountability review’, Working Paper. Utrecht University School of Governance.Google Scholar
Schillemans, T., van Twist, M. and Vanhommerig, I. 2013. ‘Innovations in accountability’, Public Performance & Management Review 36(3): 407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. 2000. ‘Accountability in the regulative state’, Journal of Law & Society 38 (1): 38–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenbæk, N. and Treppendahl, M. B. 2006. Hvad kan forklare innovation i danske virksomheder? (What Can Explain Innovation in Danish Businesses?). Copenhagen: Ministry of Economy and Commerce.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. 2012. ‘Governance and innovation in the public sector’, in Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–27.Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., Ruvio, A. and Schwabski, N. 2005. Innovation in the Public Sector. Report on the Public Surveys. Haifa: University of Haifa, Publin Report No. D17.Google Scholar
Willems, T. and Van Dooren, W. 2011. ‘Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(3): 505–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windrum, P. 2008. ‘Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services’, in Windrum, P. and Koch, P. (eds.), Innovation in Public Sector Services. Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J. P. 1993. The Reforming Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, P. 2012. “Policy as palimpsest,” Policy & Politics 40(3): 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M. and Rhodes, C. 2005. “Learning/Becoming/Organizing,” Organization 12(2): 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. 2001. “Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for ‘Historical Economics,’ ” in Garrouste, P. and Ionnides, S. (eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, A. 1979. “On change: Or, there is no magic size for an increment,” Political Studies 27(3): 371–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. 2005. “Organization routines and macro-actors,” in Czarniawska, B. and Hernes, T. (eds.), Actor-Network Theorizing and Action. Malmö: Liber, pp. 91–111.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C, A. E. 2008. “The regulatory response to the financial crisis,” Journal of Financial Stability 4(4): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M. T. 2006. Incrementalism and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hogwood, B. W. and Peters, B. G. 1986. Policy Dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H. A. 1976. Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Koppenjan, J. F. M. 2012. The New Public Governance in Public Service Delivery. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G. and Verhoest, K. 2011. “Explaining the innovative culture and activities of state agencies,” Organization Studies 32(10): 1321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, P. C. 2002. Government’s Greatest Achievements: From Civil Rights to Homeland Defense. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
MacCarthaigh, M. 2014. “Agency termination in Ireland: Culls or bonfires, or life after death?” Public Administration 92(4): 1017–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. 2010. Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. and Hartley, J. 2008. “Innovations in governance,” Public Management Review 10(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payan, T. 2006. Cops, Soldiers, and Diplomats: Explaining Agency Behavior in the War on Drugs. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing, 2nd edition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2002. “The politics of policy instruments,” in Salamon, L. M. (ed.), The Tools of Government. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 552–64.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and King, D. S. 2005. “The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism,” Journal of Politics 67(4): 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics,” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. and Davies, P. L. 1984. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change without Choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. 2007. “The advocacy-coalition: Innovations and clarifications,” in Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 117–68.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth new institutionalism,” European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. E. 1984. America’s Hidden Success: A Reassessment of Twenty Years of Public Policy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. 2008. “Historical institutionalism,” in Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–38.Google Scholar
Streek, W. and Thelen, K. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Styhre, A. 2007. The Innovative Bureaucracy: Bureaucracy in an Age of Fluidity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonurist, P., Kattel, R. and Lember, V. 2015. “Discovering innovation labs in the public sector,” Working Papers in Technology, Governance and Economic Dynamics 61. Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. 1980. “Policy as its own cause,” in Wildavsky, A. (ed.), Policy: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zito, A. R. 2001. “Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 586–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittoun, P. 2014. The Political Process of Policymaking. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Hartley, J. and Torfing, J. 2016. ‘Innovation’, in Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Petersen, O. H., Hjelmar, U. and Vrangbæk, K. 2015. ‘Is contracting-out still the great panacea? Meta-analysis of international studies of cost and service quality’, presented at the ICCP Conference, Milan, 1–4 July.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×