Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:35:18.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Role of Elected Politicians in Collaborative Policy Innovation

from Part II - Changing Roles of Public and Private Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

By
Eva Sørensen
Edited by
Jacob Torfing  and
Peter Triantafillou
Jacob Torfing
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Peter Triantafillou
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance , pp. 178 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agger, A. and Sørensen, E. 2014. ‘Designing collaborative policy innovation: Lessons from a Danish municipality’, in Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (eds.), Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. New York: Routledge, pp. 188–208.Google Scholar
Agger, A., Damgaard, B., Krogh, A. H. and Sørensen, E. 2015. Public Innovation in Northern Europe. London: Bentham Press.Google Scholar
Agranoff, R. and McGuire, M. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, G. and Verba, S. 1961. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (eds.) 2014. Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bara, J. and Weale, A. (eds.) 2006. Democratic Politics and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma, R. M., Bots, P. W. G., Wolters, H. A. and Hoekstra, A. Y. 2011. ‘An empirical analysis of stakeholders’ influence on policy development: The role of uncertainty handling’, Ecology and Society 16(1): 51. online URL: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art51/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. and Riopelle, K. 2011. ‘Identifying potential collaborative innovation networks to support emerging chemical legislation and global design’, Social and Behavioral Sciences 26(3): 38–45.Google Scholar
Bommert, B. 2010. ‘Collaborative innovation in the public sector’, International Public Management Review 11(2): 15–33.Google Scholar
Borins, S. 2001. ‘Encouraging innovation in the public sector’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(3): 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchey, G. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D. (eds.) 2002. Party, Process and Political Change. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Buchler, J. 2011. Hiring and Firing Public Officials. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A.-K., Rass, M. and Moeslein, K. M. 2010. ‘Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation’, Creativity and Innovation Management 19(3): 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burby, R. J. 2003. ‘Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action’, Journal of the American Planning Association 69(1): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. M. 2003. Transforming Leadership. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Chun, L. 2009. The Governance Structure of Chinese Firms: Innovation, Competitiveness, and Growth in Dual Economy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. and Welzel, C. (eds.) 2014. The Civic Culture Transformed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devere, H. 2011. ‘The resurrection of political friendship’, in Descharmes, B., Hauser, C. S., Kruger, C. and Loy, T. (eds.), Varieties of Friendship. Interdisciplinary Perspective on Social Relationships. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Dupont, C. 1996. ‘Negotiation as coalition building’, International Negotiations 1(1): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echstein, H. 1969. ‘Pressure group politics’, Journal of Medical Education 35(11): 1069–82.Google Scholar
Eggers, B. and Singh, S. 2009. The Public Innovators Playbook. Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Femia, J. V., Korosenyi, A. and Slomp, G. (eds.) 2009. Political Leadership in Liberal and Democratic Theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Fenno, R. F. Jr. 1978. Home Style. House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D. 2007. Full Disclosure: The Perils and Potentials of Transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, W. 2011. Obama Administration’s Open Government Initiative: Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1996. ‘Institutionalizing the public interest: The defense of deadlock and beyond’, American Political Science Review 90(3): 331–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2013. ‘Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship’, Public Administration Review 73(6): 821–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. 1989. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helms, L. 2015. ‘Democracy and innovation: From institutions to agency and leadership’, Democratization, ahead of print, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2014.981667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, M. (ed.) 2014. Guide to U.S. Political Parties. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. 1998. The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development. UNESCO no. 155. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R. 2005. The Politics of Attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. 2000. ‘Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic politics’, Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7): 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. 2000. ‘Interactive decision making and representative democracy: Institutional collisions and solutions’, in van Heffen, O., Kickert, W. J. M. and Thomassen, J. A. (eds.), Governance in Modern Society: Effects, Change and Formation of Government Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 114–24.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government Society Interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. 2003. Governance as Governing. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E. H. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppenjan, J., Kars, M. and van der Vaart, H. 2011. ‘Politicians as metagovernors – Can metagovernance reconcile representative democracy and network reality?’ in Torfing, J. and Triantafillou, P. (eds.), Interactive Policy Making, Metagovernance and Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 129–48.Google Scholar
Lees-Marshment, J. 2015. The Ministry of Public Input. Houndsmill: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S. and Auld, G. 2012. ‘Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change’, Policy Sciences 45(2): 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. 1959. ‘The science of “Muddling Through” ’, Public Administration Review 19(2): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, P. and Cain, T. 2010. Closing the Gap: Eliminating the Disconnect between Policy Design and Execution. Vancouver: Deloitte.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1992. Political Writings, edited by Ball, Terence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. 1998. ‘Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms’, The Journal of Politics 60(1): 126–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuleman, L. 2008. Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets. Heidelberg: Springer Press.Google Scholar
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (eds.) 2013. The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, G. and Albury, D. 2003. Innovation in the Public Sector. Strategy Unit, UK: Cabinet Office, October 2003.Google Scholar
Norris, P. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novelli, M., Schmitz, B. and Spencer, T. 2006. ‘Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience’, Tourism Management 25(6): 1141–52.Google Scholar
OECD 2010. The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1993. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, S. 2010. The New Public Governance? New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overeem, P. 2012. The Politics-Administration Dichotomy. Towards a Constitutional Perspecitive. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, P. B. and Nijstad, B.A. (eds.) 2003. Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2002. ‘Politicians and bureaucrats in the politics of policy-making’, in Osborne, S. (ed.), Public Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management. London. Routledge, pp. 156–82.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. 2003. ‘Introduction: The role of Public Administration in governing’, in Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, C. 1997. Representative Democracy in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, N. W. 1984. Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranga, L. M., Miedema, J. and Jorna, R. 2008. ‘Enhancing the innovative capacity of small firms through triple helix: Challenges and potentials’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20(6): 697–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. 1973. ‘Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences 4(2): 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, N. C. and Bradley, R. T. 1991. ‘Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level’, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 27(1): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, N. C. and King, P. J. 1996. Transforming Public Policy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. A. 1997. ‘Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development’, European Planning Studies 5(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1976 [1942]. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherranden, M. G., Slosar, B. and Sherraden, M. 2000. ‘Innovation in social policy: collaborative policy advocacy’, Social Sciences 47(3): 209–21.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. 1990. ‘Pluralism, reformed pluralism and neo-pluralism: The role of pressure groups in policy-making’, Political Studies 38(2): 302–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. 2006. ‘Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance’, American Review of Public Administration 36(1): 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. 2015. ‘Enhancing policy innovation by redesigning representative democracy’, Policy & Politics, available online. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/pap/pre-prints/content-PP_072;jsessionid=5pkfj3nffginl.alice.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2005. ‘The democratic anchorage of governance networks’, Scandinavian Political Studies 28(3): 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2009. ‘Enhancing effective and democratic network governance through metagovernance’, Public Administration 87(2): 234–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2011a. ‘Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector’, Administration and Society 43(8): 842–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. 2011b. ‘Kommunalpolitikere som ledere af politikinnovation’, Økonomi og Politik 86(4): 33–47.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. and Waldorff, S. B. 2014. ‘Collaborative policy innovation’, The Innovation Journal 19(3): 1–17.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stoker, G. and Batley, R. 1991. Local Government in Europe: Trends and Developments. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 1996. Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Müller, W. C. and Bergman, T. (eds.) 2008. The Democratic Life Circle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. 1998. ‘The politics-administration dichotomy model as aberration’, Public Administration Review 58 (1): 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svara, J. H. 2001. ‘The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future’, Public Administration Review 61(2): 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. 2016. Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and Sørensen, E. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Government 2009. ‘Open Government Initiative’, The White House, www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. 1986. ‘Lead users: A source of novel product concepts’, Management Science 32(7): 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×