Book contents
- Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance
- Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance?
- Part I Linking Governance and Innovation
- Part II Changing Roles of Public and Private Actors
- Part III Transforming Governance to Enhance Innovation
- 11 Public Innovation and Organizational Structure
- 12 Can Command and Incentive Systems Enhance Motivation and Public Innovation?
- 13 Administrative Leadership for Innovation
- 14 Thinking Allowed
- 15 Organizational Innovations and Multiple Forms of Accountability in the Post-New Public Management Era
- 16 Can Public Governance Be Changed to Enhance Innovation?
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
16 - Can Public Governance Be Changed to Enhance Innovation?
from Part III - Transforming Governance to Enhance Innovation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Book contents
- Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance
- Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance?
- Part I Linking Governance and Innovation
- Part II Changing Roles of Public and Private Actors
- Part III Transforming Governance to Enhance Innovation
- 11 Public Innovation and Organizational Structure
- 12 Can Command and Incentive Systems Enhance Motivation and Public Innovation?
- 13 Administrative Leadership for Innovation
- 14 Thinking Allowed
- 15 Organizational Innovations and Multiple Forms of Accountability in the Post-New Public Management Era
- 16 Can Public Governance Be Changed to Enhance Innovation?
- 17 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance , pp. 310 - 324Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M. and Rhodes, C. 2005. “Learning/Becoming/Organizing,” Organization 12(2): 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. 2001. “Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for ‘Historical Economics,’ ” in Garrouste, P. and Ionnides, S. (eds.), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, A. 1979. “On change: Or, there is no magic size for an increment,” Political Studies 27(3): 371–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. 2005. “Organization routines and macro-actors,” in Czarniawska, B. and Hernes, T. (eds.), Actor-Network Theorizing and Action. Malmö: Liber, pp. 91–111.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C, A. E. 2008. “The regulatory response to the financial crisis,” Journal of Financial Stability 4(4): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M. T. 2006. Incrementalism and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H. A. 1976. Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Koppenjan, J. F. M. 2012. The New Public Governance in Public Service Delivery. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G. and Verhoest, K. 2011. “Explaining the innovative culture and activities of state agencies,” Organization Studies 32(10): 1321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, P. C. 2002. Government’s Greatest Achievements: From Civil Rights to Homeland Defense. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
MacCarthaigh, M. 2014. “Agency termination in Ireland: Culls or bonfires, or life after death?” Public Administration 92(4): 1017–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. 2010. Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. and Hartley, J. 2008. “Innovations in governance,” Public Management Review 10(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payan, T. 2006. Cops, Soldiers, and Diplomats: Explaining Agency Behavior in the War on Drugs. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing, 2nd edition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. 2002. “The politics of policy instruments,” in Salamon, L. M. (ed.), The Tools of Government. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 552–64.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. and King, D. S. 2005. “The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism,” Journal of Politics 67(4): 1275–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics,” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. and Davies, P. L. 1984. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change without Choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. 2007. “The advocacy-coalition: Innovations and clarifications,” in Sabatier, P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 117–68.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth new institutionalism,” European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. E. 1984. America’s Hidden Success: A Reassessment of Twenty Years of Public Policy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. 2008. “Historical institutionalism,” in Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–38.Google Scholar
Streek, W. and Thelen, K. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Styhre, A. 2007. The Innovative Bureaucracy: Bureaucracy in an Age of Fluidity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonurist, P., Kattel, R. and Lember, V. 2015. “Discovering innovation labs in the public sector,” Working Papers in Technology, Governance and Economic Dynamics 61. Tallinn: Tallinn University of Technology.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. 1980. “Policy as its own cause,” in Wildavsky, A. (ed.), Policy: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zito, A. R. 2001. “Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 586–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittoun, P. 2014. The Political Process of Policymaking. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar