We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part 5 - Future directions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Introduction
It is a truism to state that mental health services operate within the context of policy. While health policy has, at various times, gone through cycles of support for growth and investment in mental health services, mental health rehabilitation services have repeatedly had to state the case for their continued existence. In this chapter, we describe this process, focusing on the past decade or so. At its core, this narrative has an unsettling message for rehabilitation practitioners: that policy-makers are only too ready to marginalise people with the most complex mental health problems in the mistaken belief that the latest approach to reorganising services will magically negate the need for mental health rehabilitation. Understanding how to influence policy is a key skill for clinical leaders in mental health rehabilitation and we hope that this chapter will provide an insight and resources into how this can be achieved.
A brief history
Earlier chapters have described in some detail the process of deinstitutionalisation of mental health services in England and Wales in the latter half of the 20th century, and similar activities were carried out in many other high-income countries across the world around the same time. This was a period of relative ‘boom’ for rehabilitation services, with many of those practising in this discipline being heavily involved in the process of assessment and the ‘resettling’ of patients in supported accommodation in the community. The first community rehabilitation teams developed around this time to provide ongoing support to this cohort of patients. The outcomes reported by the Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) were very positive; most of those who had been long-stay patients in an institution who moved to a community placement did not relapse or require readmission to hospital (Leff & Trieman, 2000) and around twothirds of those considered the least suitable for community placement not only remained stable in the community but were able to move on to less supported accommodation within 5 years (Trieman & Leff, 2002).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
