Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:06:17.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

Michael Lower
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Employee Participation in Governance
A Legal and Ethical Analysis
, pp. 202 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, H. and Naughton, M., ‘Beyond the shareholder model of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Annan, K., ‘Two concepts of sovereignty’, The Economist (September 18th, 1999)
Argandona, A., ‘The stakeholder theory and the common good’, Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1998), pp. 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, J., Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S., ‘Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), pp. 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axworthy, C., ‘Corporation law as if some people mattered’, University of Toronto Law Journal 36 (1981), pp. 392–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, S., ‘Corporate decision-making and the moral rights of employees’, Villanova Law Review 43 (1998) pp. 780–828.Google Scholar
Barca, F. and Brecht, M. (eds.), The control of corporate Europe, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Bellace, J., ‘The role of the law in supporting employee representation systems’, Comparative Labor Law Journal 15 (1994), pp. 441–460.Google Scholar
Bellace, J., ‘The European Works Council Directive: Transnational information and consultation in the European Union’, Comparative Labor Law Journal 18 (1996–1997), pp. 325–361.Google Scholar
Benedict, XVI, Deus caritas est, (2005) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Benedict, XVI, Caritas in veritate, (2009) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Bercusson, B., European Labour Law, (London: Butterworths, 1996).Google Scholar
Bercusson, B., ‘The European social model comes to Britain’, Industrial Law Journal 31 (2002), pp. 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M., Ownership and control. Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century, (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Blair, M., ‘Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Blair, M. and Stout, L., ‘A team production theory of corporate law’, Virginia Law Review 85 (1999), pp. 247–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainpain, R., European Labour Law, (11th revised ed.), (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar
Blasi, J., Kruse, D., Sesil, J. and Kroumova, M., ‘An assessment of employee ownership in the United States with implications for the EU, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (2003), pp. 893–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Bullock Report, Command Paper (Cmnd.) 6706, HMSO.
Burbidge, P., ‘Creating high performance boardrooms and workplaces – European corporate governance in the twenty first century’, European Law Review 28 (2003), pp. 642–663.Google Scholar
Calo, Z., ‘ “True economic liberalism” and the development of American Catholic Social Thought, 1920–1940’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvez, J.-Y. and Perrin, J., The Church and social justice. The social teaching of the Popes from Leo XIII to Pius XII (1878–1958), (Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1961).Google Scholar
Calvez, J.-Y. and Naughton, M., ‘Catholic Social Teaching and the purpose of a business organisation: A developing tradition’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Canavan, F., , S. J., ‘The popes and the economy’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 11 (1997), pp. 429–444.Google Scholar
Carley, M. and Hall, M., ‘The implementation of the European Works Council Directive’, Industrial Law Journal 29 (2000), pp. 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carozza, P., ‘Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law’, American Journal of International Law 97 (2003), pp. 38–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carozza, P., Catechism of the Catholic Church, (available at www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/ccc_toc.htm, last accessed 13th July 2009).
Carozza, P., The Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, The common good and the Catholic Church's social teaching, (1996), (available at www.catholic-ew.org.uk/ccb/catholic_church/publications, last accessed on 25th July 2009).
Charles, R., , S.J., Christian social witness and teaching. The Catholic tradition from Genesis to centessimus annus, (two volumes), (Leominster: Gracewing, 1998).Google Scholar
Charles, R., , S.J., An introduction to Catholic Social Teaching, (Oxford: Family Publications, 1999).Google Scholar
Cessario, R., , O.P., Introduction to moral theology, (Washington DC: The Catholic University Press of America, 2001).Google Scholar
Charny, D., ‘Workers and corporate governance: The role of political culture’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Charny, D., ‘Regulatory competition and the global co-ordination of labor standards’, Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000), pp. 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chmielewski, P., ‘Workers’ participation in the United States; Catholic Social Teaching and democratic theory', Review of Social Economy LV (1997), pp. 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H., Employment Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership (June 2008), (available at www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/Display.aspx?MasterId=9d2aa2cb-e971–4782-b6c1–028cc8374ae4&NavigationId=586, last accessed on 18th July 2009).
Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).
Cooter, R., ‘The best right values: value foundations of the economic analysis of law’, Notre Dame Law Review, p. 817.
Cooter, R. and Ulen, T., Law and economics, (4th edn), (Boston: Pearson/Addison Wesley, 2004).Google Scholar
Copleston, F., Medieval philosophy, (New York: Harper Brothers, 1961).Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘The Bullock Report and employee participation in corporate planning in the UK’, Journal of Comparative Corporate Law and Securities Regulation 1 (1978), pp. 245–272.Google Scholar
Davies, P.Employee representation and corporate law reform: A comment from the United Kingdom’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 22 (2000–2001), pp. 135–147.Google Scholar
Davies, P.Introduction to Company Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Davies, P. ‘Employee involvement in the European Company’, in Rickford, J. (ed.). The European Company. Developing a Community Law of Corporations, (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2003).Google Scholar
Davies, P.Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law, (8th ed.), (London: Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Lord Wedderburn of Charlton, ‘The land of industrial democracy’, 6 (1977), pp. 197–211.
,The Davignon Report, ‘European systems of worker involvement’ (with regard to the European Company Statute and the other pending proposals), (1997).
Deakin, S., The coming transformation of shareholder value', Corporate Governance: An International Review 41 (2003), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., ‘“Enterprise-risk”: The juridical nature of the firm revisited’, Industrial Law Journal 32 (2003), pp. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., Hobbs, R., Konzelmann, S. and Wilkinson, F., ‘Partnership, ownership and control. The impact of corporate governance on employment relations, Employee Relations 24 (2002), pp. 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., Hobbs, R., Nash, D. and Slinger, G., Implied contracts, takeovers and corporate governance: In the shadow of the City Code, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper 254.
Deakin, S. and Morris, G., Labour Law, (4th edn), (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
,Department of Trade and Industry, Company Law reform, (2005), Cm. 6456.
Dinh, V., ‘Codetermination and corporate governance in a multinational business enterprise’, Journal of Corporation Law 24 (1999), pp. 975–999.Google Scholar
Donald, D., ‘Shareholder voice and its opponentsJournal of Corporate Law Studies 5 (2005), pp. 305–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L., ‘The ethereal hand: Organisational economics and management theory’, The Academy of Management Review 15 (1990), pp. 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, G., Governing the firm: Workers' control in theory and practice, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, G. and Putterman, L., ‘Why capital (usually) hires labour: An assessment of proposed explanations’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Du Plessis, J. and Sandrock, O., ‘The rise and fall of supervisory codetermination in Germany’, International Company and Commercial Law Review 16 (2005), pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M. and Ackers, P., ‘The meanings of employee voice’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 15 (2004), pp. 1149–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P., Managing in turbulent times, (London: William Heinemann Ltd, 1980).Google Scholar
Drury, R., ‘Migrating companies’, European Law Review 24 (1999), pp. 354–372.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., ‘The corporate contract’, Columbia Law Review 89 (1989), pp. 1416–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., The economic structure of corporate law, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Edwards, T., ‘Corporate governance, industrial relations and trends in company-level restructuring in Europe: Convergence towards the Anglo-American model?’, Industrial Relations Journal 35 (2004), pp. 518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J., Aquinas. Moral, political and legal theory, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Finnis, J., Natural law and natural rights, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, S., ‘ “True human community”: Catholic Social Thought, Aristotelean ethics, and the moral order of the business company’, Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001), pp. 1243–1279.Google Scholar
Fort, T., Ethics and governance, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Fort, T., ‘Business as a mediating institution’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S., ‘Spending less time with the family: The decline of family ownership in the United Kingdom’, in Morck, R. (ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Frick, B. and Lehmann, E., ‘Corporate governance in Germany: Ownership, codetermination and firm performance in a stakeholder economy’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘The social responsibility of business is to make a profit’, The New York Times Magazine, 13th September, 1970.
Gates, J., ‘Reengineering ownership for the common good’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
George, R., ‘A defense of the new natural law theory’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 41 (1996), pp. 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghilarducci, T., Hawley, J. and Williams, A., ‘Labour's paradoxical interests and the evolution of corporate governance’, Journal of Law and Society 24 (1997), pp. 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P., ‘Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory’, The Academy of Management Review 21 (1996), pp. 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, M. and Renneboog, L., ‘Strong managers and passive institutional investors in the UK’, in Barca, F. and Brecht, M. (eds.), The control of corporate Europe, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Gomez, J., ‘All you who labour: Towards a spirituality of work for the 21st century’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, pp. 791–814.
Goodijk, R., ‘Corporate governance and workers’ participation', Corporate Governance 8 (2000), pp. 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J., ‘Employee stock ownership in economic transitions: The case of United and the airline industry’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A., ‘Finance, corporate governance and the management of labour’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), p. 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A., ‘Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gospel, H., Lockwood, G. and Willman, P., ‘A British dilemma: Disclosure of information for collective bargaining and joint consultation’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 22 (20002001), pp. 327–349.Google Scholar
Green, S., Serving God? Serving Mammon?, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996).Google Scholar
Greenfield, K., ‘The place of workers in corporate lawBoston College Law Review 39 (1998), p. 283.Google Scholar
Gregg, S., Challenging the modern world. Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and the development of Catholic Social Teaching, (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Gregg, S., ‘Investing in morality’, Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management 4 (2002), pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
Grisez, G., The way of the Lord Jesus. Christian moral principles, (Quincy, Illinois: Franciscan Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Grisez, G., The way of the Lord Jesus. Living a Christian life, (Quincy, Illinois: Franciscan Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J., ‘Practical principles, moral truth and ultimate ends’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1987), pp. 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronbacher, G. and Sirico, R., ‘Towards a personalist work ethic’, in Machan, T. (ed.), Morality and work, (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Guest, D. and Peccei, R., ‘Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 39 (2001), pp. 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halal, W., ‘Corporate community: A theory of the firm uniting profitability and responsibility’, Strategy and Leadership, February 28th, 2000, pp. 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H., ‘When does worker ownership work? ESOPs, law firms, codetermination and economic democracy’, The Yale Law Journal 99 (19891990), pp. 1749–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H., ‘Worker participation and corporate governance’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The end of history for corporate law’, Georgetown Law Journal 89 (2001), pp. 439–468.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘What is corporate law?’ in The anatomy of corporate law. A comparative and functional approach, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Harrington, L., ‘Ethics and public policy analysis: Stakeholders’ interests and regulatory policy', Journal of Business Ethics 15 (1996), pp. 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J. and Williams, A., Fiduciary capitalism. How institutional investors can make corporate America more democratic, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Hervada, J., The principles of the social doctrine of the Church, (available at www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/social.html, last accessed on 25th July 2009).
Hollenbach, D., , S.J., The common good and Christian ethics, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollenbach, D., , S.J., ‘“Economic justice for all” twenty years later’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought, 5 (2008), pp. 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeyball, S., Honeyball & Bower's textbook on Employment Law, (10th edn), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Hopt, K., ‘New ways in corporate governance: European experiments with labor representation on corporate boards’, Michigan Law Review 82 (19831984), pp. 1338–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and Trebilcock, M., ‘Protecting the employment bargain’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 751–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illanes, J.L., The sanctification of work, (New York: Scepter Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar
Shareholders, Institutional' Committee, , The responsibilities of institutional shareholders and agents – a statement of principles (updated 2007), (available at institutionalshareholderscommittee.org.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/ISCStatementofPrinciplesJun07.pdf, last accessed on 18th July 2009).
Jacoby, S., The embedded corporation, (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Jacoby, S., ‘Corporate governance and employees in the United States’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jackson, G., ‘Towards a comparative perspective on corporate governance and labour management: Enterprise coalitions and national trajectories’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jackson, G., Hopner, M. and Kurdelbusch, A., ‘Corporate governance and employees in Germany: Changing linkages, complementarities and tensions’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976), pp. 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, XXII Mater et magistra (1961) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_15051961_mater_en.html, last accessed on 20th July 2009).
John, XXIII Pacem in terris, (1963) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_11041963_pacem_en.html, last accessed on 31st July 2009).
Paul, John II, Redemptor hominis (1979), (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_04031979_redemptor-hominis_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Paul, John II, Laborem exercens, (1981) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Paul, John II Sollicitudo rei socialis, (1987) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis_en.html, last accessed on 11th July.
Paul, John II Centesimus annus, (1991) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus_en.html, last accessed on 11th July 2009).
Paul, John II Veritatis splendor, (1993) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009)
Paul, John II Evangelium vitae, (1995) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Paul, John II Fides et ratio, (1998) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_15101998_fides-et-ratio_en.html, last accessed on 31st July 2009).
Johnston, A., ‘EC freedom of establishment, employee participation in corporate governance and the limits of regulatory competition’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 6 (2006), pp. 71–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. and Silberston, A., ‘Corporate governance’, in MacMillan Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar
Keller, B., ‘The European Company statute: Employee involvement and beyond’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2002), pp. 424–445.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R., ‘The virtue of solidarity and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kennedy, R., ‘Business and the common good in the Catholic social tradition’, Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management 4 (2002), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
Kershaw, D., ‘No end in sight for the history of corporate law: The case of employee participation in corporate governance’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 34 (2002), pp. 34–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klare, K., ‘Workplace democracy and market reconstruction: An agenda for legal reform’, Catholic University Law Review, pp. 1–68.
Kohler, T., ‘Lessons from the Social Charter: State, corporation and the principle of subsidiarity’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslowski, P., ‘The shareholder value principle and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kulik, B., ‘Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution’, Journal of Business Ethics 59 (2005), pp. 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Learmount, S., Corporate governance – what can be learned from Japan?, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRef
Lee, P., ‘Institutional shareholder activism – part 2’, in Smerdon, R., A practical guide to corporate governance, (3rd edn), (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar
Leo, XIII Rerum novarum, (1891) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html, last accessed on 11th July 2009).
Lorber, P., ‘Reviewing the European Works Council Directive: European Progress and United Kingdom Perspective’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2004), pp. 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lower, M., ‘Subsidiarity and the corporation’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 2 (2005), pp. 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lower, M., ‘John Paul II and employee participation in corporate governance’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 21 (2007), pp. 111–158.Google Scholar
Lower, M.Christian anthropology and the theory of the firm’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowisch, M., ‘Job safeguarding as an object of the rights of information, consultation, and co-determintation in European and German law’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 26 (20042005), pp. 371–379.Google Scholar
Lutz, D., ‘Christian social thought and corporate governance’, in Kennedy, R. (ed.), Religion and public life, (Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 2001), pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
Lynch Fannon, I., Working within two kinds of capitalism. Corporate governance and employee stakeholding. US and EC perspectives, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
Machan, T., Morality and work. Philosophic reflections on a free society, (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Mallin, C., Corporate governance, (2nd edn), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Manne, H., ‘Mergers and the market for corporate control’, The Journal of Political Economy 73 (1965), pp. 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maritain, J., ‘The people and the state’, reprinted in Logos 11 (2008).
Maxwell, J., ‘Should Christians press for revision of Company law?’, University of Detroit Law Journal 40 (1962), pp. 1–165.Google Scholar
May, W., An introduction to moral theology, (2nd edn), Huntington, Ind: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2003).Google Scholar
McCall, J., ‘Employee participation in corporate governance: A defense of strong participation rights’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2001), pp. 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, D., ‘Business corporations and the principle of subsidiarity’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Mele, D., Cristianos en la sociedad. Introduccion a la doctrina social de la Iglesia, (3rd edn), (Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, S.A., 2000).Google Scholar
Mele, D., ‘Not only stakeholder interests. The firm oriented towards the common good’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame: Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Michie, J. and Oughton, C., ‘Employee participation and ownership rights’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 2 (2002), pp. 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misner, P., Social Catholicism in Europe. From the onset of industrialization to the First World War, (New York: Dartford, Longman and Todd, 1991).Google Scholar
Messner, J., Social ethics. Natural law in the western world, (St Louis and London: B. Herder Book Co., 1965).Google Scholar
Monks, R. and Nell, M., Corporate governance, (Malden, Ma: Blackwell Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Morck, R. (ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005).CrossRef
Murphy, J. and Pyke, D., ‘Humane work and the challenges of job design’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Myners Report on corporate governance, HM Treasury, London, (2001).
Naughton, M., ‘The corporation as a community of work: Understanding the firm within the Catholic social tradition’, Ave Maria Law Review 4 (2006), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Newman, J., Co-responsibility in industry: Social justice in labour management relations, (Cork: Cork University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Njoya, W., ‘Employee ownership and efficiency: An evolutionary perspective’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2004), pp. 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njoya, W., Property in work. The employment relationship in the Anglo-American firm, (Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Novak, M., The corporation: A theological inquiry, (Washington: The American Enterprise Institute Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Novak, M., Toward a theology of the corporation, (Washington: The AEI Press, 1990).Google Scholar
O' Connor, J., ‘Making a case for the common good in a global economy. The United Nations Human Development Reports (1990–2001)’, Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2002), pp. 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O' Connor, M., ‘The human capital era: Re-conceptualising corporate law to facilitate labour management co-operationCornell Law Review 78 (1993), pp. 901–965.Google Scholar
O' Connor, M., ‘Global capitalism and the evolution of American corporate governance’, in MacMillan Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar
O' Connor, M., ‘Employees and corporate governance: United States: Labour's role in the American corporate governance structure’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 22 (2000), pp. 97–133.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, R., The case for workers' co-ops, (Basingstoke: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogletree, T., ‘Corporate capitalism and the common good. A framework for addressing the challenges of a global economy.’ Journal of Religious Ethics, 30 (2002), pp. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J., Corporate power and responsibility. Issues in the theory of Company Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., ‘Models of the company and the employment relationship’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, VIPopulorum progressio (1967) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html, last accessed 13th July 2009).
Paul, VIOctogesima adveniens (1971) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/apost_letters/documents/hf_p-vi_apl_19710514_octogesima-adveniens_en.html, last accessed on 20th July 2009).
Pecorella, R., ‘Property rights, the common good and the state: The Catholic view of market economies’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 235–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendleton, A., Employee ownership, participation and governance – a study of ESOPs in the UK, (London and New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Pendleton, A. and Gospel, H., ‘Markets and relationships: Finance, governance and labour in the United Kingdom’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pesch, H., , S.J., Ethics and the national economy, (translated by Ederer, Dr Rupert), (Norfolk, VA: IHS Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pinckaers, S., The sources of Christian ethics, (translated by Thomas Noble, M.), (Washington DC: The Catholic University Press of America, 1995).Google Scholar
Paul, VIMorality. The Catholic view, (South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pistor, K., ‘Codetermination: A socio-political model with governance externalities’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Pius, XIQuadragesimo anno, (1931) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno_en.html, last accessed on 15th July 2009).
Sciences, Pontifical Academy of Social, Work and human fulfillment, (Ave Maria, Fl.: Sapientia Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, trans. 2004).Google Scholar
Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and, The report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, (‘the Cadbury Report’) (1992).
Reberioux, A., ‘European style of corporate governance at the crossroads: The role of worker involvement’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2002), pp. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M. and Appeldoorn, B., ‘Capital unbound? The transformation of European corporate governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1998), pp. 406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., ‘Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: the individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability’, Human Relations 54 (2001), pp. 1547–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, VIThe manufacture of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Organisation 10 (2003), pp. 249–265.Google Scholar
Rock, E. and Wachter, M., ‘Tailored claims and governance: the fit between employees and shareholders’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Roe, M., ‘Codetermination and German securities markets’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Paul, VIPolitical determinants of corporate governance, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).
Sadowski, D., Junkes, J. and Lindenthal, S., ‘Employees and corporate governance: Germany: The German model of corporate and labor governance’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 22 (2000), pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Sargent, M., ‘Utility, the good and civic happiness: a Catholic critique of law and economics’, Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 44 (2005), p. 36.Google Scholar
Schall, J., , S.J., ‘Catholicism, business and priorities’, in Williams, O. and Houck, J. (eds.), The Judaeo-Christian vision and the modern corporation, (Notre Dame, Ind.:University of Notre Dame Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Schiek, D., ‘Autonomous collective agreements as a regulatory device in European Labour Law: How to read article 139 EC’, Industrial Law Journal 34 (2005), pp. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, F., ‘Corporate governance in Germany: The move to shareholder value’, Corporate Governance 9 (2001), pp. 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, G., S.J., ‘Worker-ownership and Catholic Social Thought’, Social Policy Winter 2001/2002, pp. 12–16.
Schultze, G., , S.J., ‘Work, worship, Laborem exercens and the United States today’, Logos 5 (2002), pp. 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, C., God is work: Discovering the divine pattern for work in the new millenium, (Oxford: Lion UK, 1999).Google Scholar
Council, Second Vatican, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the modern world, Gaudium et Spes, (1965) (available at www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Shareholder ownership: A report on ownership of shares as at December 31, 2004, Office of National Statistics.
Shleifer, A. and Summers, L., Breaches of trust in hostile takeovers, (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J., ‘Jobs and justice: rethinking the stakeholder debate’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 473–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smerdon, R., A practical guide to corporate governance, (3rd edn), (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar
Stabile, S., ‘Workers in the vineyard: Catholic Social Thought and the workplace’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 371–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapledon, G., Institutional investors and corporate governance, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sun, J.-M. and Pelkmans, J., ‘Regulatory competition in the single market’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (1995), pp. 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J.-M. and Pelkmans, J., The Takeover Code, (9th edn, 2009), (available at www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf, last accessed on 20th July 2009).
Tavis, L., ‘Modern contract theory and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002), pp. 215–236.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C., ‘A pure theory of local expenditures’, The Journal of Political Economy 64 (1956), pp. 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishops, US Conference of Catholic, Economic justice for all, (1986) (available at www.usccb.org/jphd/economiclife/pdf/economic_justice_for_all.pdf, last accessed on 13th July 2009).
Vagts, D., ‘Reforming the “modern” corporation: Perspectives from the German’, Harvard Law Review 80 (1966–67), pp. 23–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vann, G., O.P., Morals and man, (London: Fontana Books, 1960).Google Scholar
Vischer, R., ‘Subsidiarity as a principle of governance: Beyond devolution’, Indiana Law Review 35 (20012002), pp. 103–142.Google Scholar
Paul, VIThe morally distinct corporation: reclaiming the relational dimension of conscience’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 323–369.Google Scholar
Waddington, J., ‘What do representatives think of the practices of European Works Councils? Views from six countries’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 9 (2003), pp. 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, Lord Wedderburn of,‘Companies and employees: Common law or social dimension’, Law Quarterly Review 109 (1993), pp. 220–262.Google Scholar
Paul, VIEmployees, partnership and company law', Industrial Law Journal 31 (2002), pp. 99–111.Google Scholar
Weigel, G., ‘The Church's Social Doctrine in the twenty-first century’, Logos 6 (2003), pp. 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werlauff, E., ‘The development of Community company law’, European Law Review 17 (1992), pp. 207–231.Google Scholar
Paul, VIUsing a foreign company for domestic activities’, European Business Law Review 10 (2000), pp. 306–313.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S., Corporations and the third way, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar
Wilber, C., ‘Economics and ethics: The challenge of the bishops’ pastoral letter on the economy', Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 2 (19851987), pp. 107–124.Google Scholar
Williamson, O., ‘Corporate governance’, The Yale Law Journal 93 (1984), pp. 1197–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtyla, K., Person and community. Selected essays, (Sandok, T., , O.S.M. trans.), (New Jersey: Peter Lang, 1993).Google Scholar
Wouters, J., ‘European company law: Quo Vadis?’, Common Market Law Review 37 (2000), pp. 257–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbansen, P., ‘The parallel worlds of corporate governance and labor law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13 (2006), pp. 261–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Lower, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Employee Participation in Governance
  • Online publication: 05 October 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780721.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Lower, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Employee Participation in Governance
  • Online publication: 05 October 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780721.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Lower, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Employee Participation in Governance
  • Online publication: 05 October 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780721.012
Available formats
×