Book contents
- Eminent Domain
- Reviews
- Eminent Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Taking Law from an Economic Perspective with Reference to German Law
- 2 Eminent Domain in the United States
- 3 Direct Expropriation: Multi-Layered Legal Protection in Europe
- 4 Eminent Domain Law in Taiwan: New Law, Old Practice?
- 5 Compulsory Land Acquisition in Developing Countries: Shifting Paradigm or Entrenched Legacy?
- 6 Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System
- 7 Who Exercises the Eminent Domain Power in Korea? A Focus on Private Takings
- 8 Just Compensation in Eminent Domain in Korea: From the Perspective of Fairness
- 9 Overall Due Process in Takings in Korea
- 10 Distribution of Development Surplus in Takings*
- 11 Takings, Disputes, and Resolutions in Korea: A Quantitative Review
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
8 - Just Compensation in Eminent Domain in Korea: From the Perspective of Fairness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
By
Book contents
- Eminent Domain
- Reviews
- Eminent Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Taking Law from an Economic Perspective with Reference to German Law
- 2 Eminent Domain in the United States
- 3 Direct Expropriation: Multi-Layered Legal Protection in Europe
- 4 Eminent Domain Law in Taiwan: New Law, Old Practice?
- 5 Compulsory Land Acquisition in Developing Countries: Shifting Paradigm or Entrenched Legacy?
- 6 Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System
- 7 Who Exercises the Eminent Domain Power in Korea? A Focus on Private Takings
- 8 Just Compensation in Eminent Domain in Korea: From the Perspective of Fairness
- 9 Overall Due Process in Takings in Korea
- 10 Distribution of Development Surplus in Takings*
- 11 Takings, Disputes, and Resolutions in Korea: A Quantitative Review
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Eminent DomainA Comparative Perspective, pp. 208 - 229Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References in English
Burrows, Paul, 1991, “Compensation of Compulsory Acquisition,” Land Economics, vol. 67(1), pp. 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, Paul, 2011, “An Empirical Study of Court-Adjudicated Takings Compensation in New York City: 1990–2003,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 8(2), pp. 384–412.Google Scholar
Clauretie, M. Terrence, Kuhn, William and Schwer, Keith R., 2004, “Residential Properties Taken under Eminent Domain: Do Government Appraisers Track Market Values?,” Journal of Real Estate Research, vol. 26(3), pp. 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A., Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain (Harvard University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposto, G. Alfredo, 1996, “The Political Economy of Taking and Just Compensation,” Public Choice, vol. 89(3–4), pp. 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne, 2004, “Taking Eminent Domain Apart,” Michigan State Law Review vol. 2004: 957–1004.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne, 1989, “A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 9(2), pp. 115–28.Google Scholar
Hermalin, Benjamin E., 1995, “An Economic Analysis of Takings,” Journal of Law Economics and Organization, vol. 11(1): 64–86.Google Scholar
Kotaka, Tsuyoshi and Callies, David L., Taking Land: Compulsory Purchase and Regulation of Land in Asian-Pacific Countries (University of Hawaii Press 2002).Google Scholar
Lee, Brian Angelo, 2013, “Just Under-compensation: The Idiosyncratic Premium in Eminent Domain,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 113, pp. 593–655.Google Scholar
Melton, Buckner, F., 1996, “Eminent Domain, Public Use, and the Conundrum of Original Intent,” Natural Resources Journal, vol. 36, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar
Miceli, J. Thomas, The Economic Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, J. Thomas and Segerson, Kathleen, 1994, “Regulatory Takings: When Should Compensation Be Paid?” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, pp. 749–76.Google Scholar
Michelman, I. Frank, 1967, “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of Just Compensation Law,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 80, pp. 1165–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munch, Patricia, 1976, “An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, pp. 473–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosal, Ed., 2001, “The Takings of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 82, pp. 431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Sungkyu, Distribution of Development Surplus in Takings, paper presented at the International Conference on Shifting the Paradigm for Sustainable Development: Eminent Domain and Property Rights (Korea Development Institute, 2015).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Susan, Before Eminent Domain: Toward a History of Expropriation of Land for the Common Good: Toward a History of Expropriation of Land for the Common Good (University of North Carolina Press, 2010).Google Scholar
References in Korean
Kim, Duol and Kim, Iljoong, Is Just Compensation for Compulsory Purchase a Creature of Modern Constitution in Asia? Evidence from Late 18th Century Korea, Working Paper, KLEA International Conference of Law and Economics (2013).Google Scholar
Kim, Iljoong, Cho, ByungKoo, Kim, Duol, Park, Sungkyu, Lee, Hojun and Jung, Kisang, A Law-and-Economics Study on Takings Law in Korea (KDI, 2013).Google Scholar
Kim, Jaehoon and Lee, Hojun, Political Economy of Public Investment Projects, KDI Policy Research Series (KDI, 2013).Google Scholar
Lee, Hojun and Kim, Hyungtai, Studies on Public Expropriation, KDI, Policy Research Series (KDI, 2012).Google Scholar
MOLIT, 2013 Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience: The Expropriation and Compensation System in Korea (MOLIT and Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2014).Google Scholar
Park, Sungkyu, 2011, “Eminent Domain, Just Compensation, Officially Announced Land Price, Market Value, Revision Based on Other Factors,” Journal of Korea Real Estate Analysis Association, vol. 17, pp. 133–54.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by