Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:15:18.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2022

Tobias Ackermann
Tobias Ackermann
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Effects of Armed Conflict on Investment Treaties , pp. 289 - 339
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Patrick, ‘Counterclaims Based on International Human Rights Obligations of Investors in International Investment Arbitration: Fallacies and Potentials of the 2016 ICSID Urbaser v. Argentina Award’ (2018) 1 Brill Open Law 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abresch, William, ‘A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 741–67.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias, ‘Von Distomo über Varvarin bis Kundus: Entschädigungsansprüche von Opfern bewaffneter Konflikte vor deutschen Gerichten’ (2015) 28 Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict 179–89.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias, ‘The ILC Draft Articles on the Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties: Room for Termination or Suspension of Bilateral Investment Treaties?’ (2016), Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions, Discussion Paper, http://minervaextremelaw.haifa.ac.il/index.php/en/2013-06-24-07-48-7/discussion-papers.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias, ‘Die Auswirkungen bewaffneter Konflikte auf völkerrechtliche Verträge im Wandel der Zeit’, in Wuschka, Sebastian and others (eds.), Zeit und Internationales Recht (Mohr Siebeck, 2019), pp. 121–38.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias, ‘Exception Clauses in International Investment Agreements: A Case for Systemic Integration?’, in Akbaba, Mesut and Capurro, Giancarlo (eds.), International Challenges in Investment Arbitration (Routledge, 2019), pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias, ‘Investments under Occupation: The Application of Investment Treaties to Occupied Territory’, in Fach Gómez, Katia, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias and Fenrich, Katrin, ‘Motion and Rest: International Law’s Responsiveness Towards Terrorism, Mass Surveillance, and Self-Defence’ (2017) 77 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 745–807.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021).Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 32–79.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo and Williams, Sope, ‘International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO?’ (2003) 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 365–404.Google Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ (1974–75) 47 British Yearbook of International Law 273–85.Google Scholar
Albers, Jan, Responsibility and Liability in the Context of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes by Sea: Existing Rules and the 1999 Liability Protocol to the Basel Convention (Springer, 2015).Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H., ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property? The Decisions of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 585–610.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H., The Jurisprudence of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal: An Analysis of the Decisions of the Tribunal (Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Alford, Roger P., ‘The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception’ (2011) Utah Law Review 697–759.Google Scholar
Alford, Roger P., ‘The Convergence of International Trade and Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 35–63.Google Scholar
Al-Rashid, Meriam, Bardyn, Ulyana, and Golendukhin, Levon, ‘Investment Claims Amid Civil Unrest: Questions of Attribution and Responsibility’ (2016) 3 BCDR International Arbitration Review 181–218.Google Scholar
Alreshaid, Nasser, ‘Revisiting the Notion of Full Protection and Security of Foreign Direct Investments in Post-Gadhafi Libya: Two Governments, Tribal Violence, Militias, and Plenty More’ (2016) 28 Florida Journal of International Law 63–86.Google Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang and Hui, Kun, ‘Missing in Action: General Public Policy Exceptions in Investment Treaties’, in Sachs, Lisa, Johnson, Lise, and Coleman, Jesse (eds.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2018 (Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 363–93.Google Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang and Skougarevskiy, Dmitriy, ‘Mapping the Universe of International Investment Agreements’ (2016) 19 Journal of International Economic Law 561–88.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José A. and Brink, Tegan, ‘Revisiting the Necessity Defense: Continental Casualty v. Argentina’, in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010–2011 (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 319–62.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José A. and Khamsi, Kathryn, ‘The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime’, in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2008–2009 (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 379–476.Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan F., Jurisdiction of International Tribunals (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute, 1987).Google Scholar
Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds.), A Farewell to Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Angelet, Nicolas, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2011), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas M. and Gonza, Alejandra, The American Convention on Human Rights: Essential Rights (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Aparac, Jelena, ‘Business and Armed Non-State Groups: Challenging the Landscape of Corporate (Un)accountability in Armed Conflicts’ (2020) 5 Business and Human Rights Journal 270–75.Google Scholar
Appel, Benjamin J. and Loyle, Cyanne E., ‘The Economic Benefits of Justice: Post-Conflict Justice and Foreign Direct Investment’ (2012) 49 Journal of Peace Research 685–99.Google Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, ‘Excessive Collateral Civilian Casualties and Military Necessity: Awkward Crossroads in International Humanitarian Law between State Responsibility and Individual Criminal Liability’, in Chinkin, Christine and Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 325–39.Google Scholar
Arias, Harmodio, ‘Non-Liability of States for Damages Suffered by Foreigners in the Course of a Riot, an Insurrection, or Civil War’ (1913) 7 American Journal of International Law 724–66.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana, Kasfir, Nelson, and Mampilly, Zachariah Cherian (eds.), Rebel Governance in Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjona, Ana, Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Asada, Masahiko, ‘Definition and Legal Justification of Sanctions’, in Asada, Masahiko (ed.), Economic Sanctions in International Law and Practice (Routledge, 2020), pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Ascensio, Hervé, ‘Article 31 of the Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties and International Investment Law’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 366–87.Google Scholar
Atanasova, Dafina, Benoit, Adrián Martínez, and Ostřanský, Josef, ‘The Legal Framework for Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 31 Journal of International Arbitration 357–91.Google Scholar
Augenblick, Mark and Rousseau, Alison B., ‘Force Majeure in Tumultuous Times: Impracticability as the New Impossibility – It’s Not as Easy to Prove as You Might Believe’ (2012) 13 Journal of World Investment & Trade 59–75.Google Scholar
Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
B., V.L., ‘Note: The Policy and Practice of the United States in the Treatment of Enemy Private Property’ (1948) 34 Virginia Law Review 928–43.Google Scholar
Baker, Sherston, Halleck’s International Law or Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War (3rd ed., Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1893), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Balch, Oliver, ‘What Can a South Sudan Brewery Teach Us about Business in Conflict Zones?’ (The Guardian, 31 August 2015), www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/aug/31/south-sudan-brewery-sabmiller-war-economy-conflict-zone.Google Scholar
Bälz, Kilian and Mujally, Hussam, ‘Client Alert: Yemen Three Years into the Civil War’ (Amereller, 20 March 2018), www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1687b781-2003-4893-95bc-88af42222395.Google Scholar
Bastin, Lucas, ‘State Responsibility for Omissions: Establishing a Breach of the Full Protection and Security Obligation by Omissions’, DPhil thesis, University of Oxford (2017).Google Scholar
Baumann, Johanna, ‘International Investment Law in the Context of State Fragility: Full Protection and Security and Fair and Equitable Treatment’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 458–85.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J., ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Peter, ‘Towards the Constitutionalization of International Investment Protection’ (2007) 45 Archiv des Völkerrechts 153–79.Google Scholar
Bellinger, John B., III., ‘Opening Remarks at the US Meeting with the UN Committee Against Torture’ (US Department of State Archive, 5 May 2006), https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/rm/2006/66062.htm.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, ‘Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts’ (1993) 4 European Journal of International Law 159–83.Google Scholar
Berkes, Antal, International Human Rights Law Beyond State Territorial Control (Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Frank, ‘Treaty “Interpretation” in a Judicial Context’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 315–22.Google Scholar
Bhagnani, Preeti, ‘Revisiting the Countermeasures Defense in Investor-State Investment Arbitration: Approach and Analogies’, in Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2013–2014 (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 437–72.Google Scholar
Bhala, Raj, ‘National Security and International Trade Law: What the GATT Says, and what the United States Does’ (1998) 19 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 263–318.Google Scholar
Bian, Cheng, National Security Review of Foreign Investment: A Comparative Legal Analysis of China, the United States and the European Union (Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Biddle, Francis, ‘Opinion on the International Load Line Convention (28 July 1941)’, reprinted in (1949) 40 Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States advising the President and Heads of Departments in relation to their Official Duties 119–24.Google Scholar
Bílková, Veronika, ‘Establishing Direct Responsibility of Armed Opposition Groups for Violations of International Humanitarian Law?’, in Gal-Or, Noemi, Ryngaert, Cedric, and Noortmann, Math (eds.), Responsibilities of the Non-State Actor in Armed Conflict and the Market Place: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings (Brill, 2015), pp. 263–84.Google Scholar
Billing, Trey and Lugg, Andrew D., ‘Conflicted Capital: The Effect of Civil Conflict on Patterns of BIT Signing’ (2019) 63 Journal of Conflict Resolution 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Christina, ‘The Pacta Sunt Servanda Rule in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Pillar and its Safeguards’, in Buffard, Isabelle and others (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Nijhoff, 2008), pp. 317–41.Google Scholar
Binder, Christina, Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht: Am Beispiel der nachträglichen Änderung der Umstände (Springer, 2013).Google Scholar
Binder, Christina, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 442–80.Google Scholar
Binder, Christina and Janig, Philipp, ‘The Effect of Armed Hostilities on Investment Treaty Obligations: A Case of Force Majeure?’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 112–36.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘Emergency Exceptions: State of Necessity and Force Majeure’, in Muchlinski, Peter T., Ortino, Federico, and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 459–523.Google Scholar
Bleckmann, Albert, ‘Die Wiederanwendung deutscher Vorkriegsverträge’ (1973) 33 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 607–35.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar, Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisierten Staaten als Rechtsbuch dargestellt (C.H. Beck, 1868).Google Scholar
Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre and Morgan-Foster, Jason, ‘Article 61 VCLT’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011), vol. 2, pp. 1382–1408.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, Iryna, ‘The WTO Panel Ruling on the National Security Exception: Has the Panel “Cut” the Baby in Half?’ (EJIL:Talk!, 12 April 2019), www.ejiltalk.org/the-wto-panel-ruling-on-the-national-security-exception-has-the-panel-cut-the-baby-in-half/.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Lisa, ‘Analysis: In Previously Unseen Turkey-Syria BIT Award, Majority Imports a More Favourable War-Losses Clause; In Dissent Ziade Warns of “Exorbitant” Implications of Majority Reading’ (Investment Arbitration Reporter, 13 November 2020), www.iareporter.com/articles/analysis-in-previously-unseen-turkey-syria-bit-award-majority-imports-a-more-favourable-war-losses-clause-in-dissent-ziade-warns-of-exorbitant-implications-of-majority-reading/.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, and Waibel, Michael, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Boothby, William H., The Law of Targeting (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or: The Law of International Claims (Banks Law Publishing Co., 1915).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Enemy Private Property’ (1924) 18 American Journal of International Law 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) 23 American Journal of International Law Special Supplement 133–239.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘The Effect of War on the Treaty of 1828 with Prussia’ (1932) 26 American Journal of International Law 582–86.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Reprisals on Private Property’ (1936) 30 American Journal of International Law 108–13.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Treatment of Enemy Property’ (1946) 34 Georgetown Law Journal 389–406.Google Scholar
Bordin, Fernando Lusa, ‘Reasserting Control through Withdrawal from Investment Agreements: What Role for the Law of Treaties?’, in Kulick, Andreas (ed.), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 209–29.Google Scholar
Borelli, Silvia, ‘The (Mis)-Use of General Principles of Law: Lex Specialis and the Relationship Between International Human Rights Law and the Laws of Armed Conflict’, in Pineschi, Laura (ed.), General Principles of Law – The Role of the Judiciary (Springer, 2015), pp. 265–93.Google Scholar
Borgen, Christopher J., ‘Resolving Treaty Conflicts’ (2005) 37 George Washington International Law Review 573–648.Google Scholar
Bowett, Derek W., ‘Economic Coercion and Reprisals by States’ (1972) 13 Virginia Journal of International Law 1–12.Google Scholar
Bowring, Bill, ‘Fragmentation, Lex Specialis and the Tensions in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2009) 14 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 485–98.Google Scholar
Braun, Tillmann Rudolf, ‘Globalization-Driven Innovation: The Investor as a Partial Subject in Public International Law – An Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Investor Rights’ (2014) 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 73–116.Google Scholar
Braun, Tillmann Rudolf, ‘International Law in Revolutionary Upheavals: On the Tension between International Investment Law and International Humanitarian Law’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 19–53.Google Scholar
Bray, Heather L., ‘Understanding Change: Evolution from International Claims Commissions to Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Schill, Stephan W., Tams, Christian J., and Hofmann, Rainer (eds.), International Investment Law and History (Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 102–35.Google Scholar
Brew, Robert, ‘Exception Clauses in International Investment Agreements as a Tool for Appropriately Balancing the Right to Regulate with Investment Protection’ (2019) 25 Canterbury Law Review 205–42.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel, ‘The Effectiveness of International Law and Stages of Governance’, in Sandholtz, Wayne and Whytock, Christopher A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Politics of International Law (Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
Briggs, Herbert W., ‘The Attorney General Invokes Rebus Sic Stantibus’ (1942) 36 American Journal of International Law 89–96.Google Scholar
Brillmayer, Lea and Chepiga, Geoffrey, ‘Ownership or Use? Civilian Property Interests in International Humanitarian Law’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 413–46.Google Scholar
Broches, Aron, ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’ (1972) 136 Recueil des Cours 331–410.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, ‘State Responsibility and the International Court of Justice’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Hart, 2004), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (7th ed., Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bücheler, Gebhard, Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence and Úbeda de Torres, Amaya, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case-Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W., ‘Inter-Relationships between the Investment Law and Other International Legal Regimes’ (2015), International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, Think Piece, http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/E15-Investment-Burke-White-Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W. and von Staden, Andreas, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2008) 48 Virginia Journal of International Law 307–410.Google Scholar
Butler, Geoffrey G. and Maccoby, Simon, The Development of International Law (Longmans, Green and Co., 1928).Google Scholar
Butler, Nicolette, ‘Non-Disputing Party Participation in ICSID Disputes: Faux Amici?’ (2019) 66 Netherlands International Law Review 143–78.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, Richard M., ‘A Legal History of International Reparations’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 314–46.Google Scholar
Caglioti, Daniela L., ‘Property Rights in Time of War: Sequestration and Liquidation of Enemy Aliens’ Assets in Western Europe during the First World War’ (2014) 12 Journal of Modern European History 523–45.Google Scholar
Cahin, Gérard, ‘Attribution of Conduct to the State: Insurrectional Movements’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 248–56.Google Scholar
Cahin, Gérard, ‘The Responsibility of Other Entities: Armed Bands and Criminal Groups’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 331–41.Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary (Cambridge University Press, 2022), https://dictionary.cambridge.org.Google Scholar
Cameron, Iain, ‘Treaties, Suspension’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2007), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Cameron, Lindsey and others, ‘Article 3’, in ICRC (ed.), Commentary on the First Geneva Convention: Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2016), paras. 351–907.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo, ‘Proportionality in the Law of Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 332–52.Google Scholar
Cappella Zielinski, Rosella, How States Pay for Wars (Cornell University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Caron, David and Shirlow, Esme, ‘Dissecting Backlash: The Unarticulated Causes of Backlash and its Unintended Consequences’, in Føllesdal, Andreas and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Judicialization of International Law: A Mixed Blessing? (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 159–82.Google Scholar
Casey-Maslen, Stuart and Haines, Steven, Hague Law Interpreted: The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of Armed Conflict (Hart, 2018).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law’ (1984) 3 UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 55–118.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Charlotin, Damien, ‘Analysis: Tribunal in Guris v Libya Award Draws Contrast with Cengiz Award on FPS Interpretation and Sides with Majority of Prior Libya Awards with Respect to War Losses Clause’ (Investment Arbitration Reporter, 5 March 2020), www.iareporter.com/articles/analysis-tribunal-in-guris-v-libya-award-draws-contrast-with-cengiz-award-on-fps-interpretation-and-sides-with-majority-of-prior-libya-awards-with-respect-to-war-losses-clause/.Google Scholar
Chen, Tsai-fang, ‘To Judge the “Self-Judging” Security Exception under the GATT 1994: – A Systematic Approach’ (2017) 12 Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy 311–56.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (first published 1953, Grotius Publications, 1987).Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali, ‘International Investment Law and Non-Economic Issues’ (2020) 53 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1–77.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali, ‘Investor Obligations for Human Rights’ (2020) 35 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 82–104.Google Scholar
Christie, George C., ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’ (1962) 38 British Yearbook of International Law 307–38.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, ‘Extending International Criminal Law beyond the Individual to Corporations and Armed Opposition Groups’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice 899–926.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, War (Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Cohen, Amichai and Zlotogorski, David, Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law (Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Cole, Tony, The Structure of Investment Arbitration (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Collicelli, Adam, ‘Frozen Obligations: Russia’s Suspension of the CFE Treaty as a Potential Violation of International Law’ (2009) 32 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 331–52.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, ‘On the Economic Consequences of Civil War’ (1999) 51 Oxford Economic Papers 168–83.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy (World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Collins, David, An Introduction to International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Conforti, Benedetto and Labella, Angelo, ‘Invalidity and Termination of Treaties: The Role of National Courts’ (1990) 1 European Journal of International Law 44–66.Google Scholar
Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Full Protection and Security’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 131–50.Google Scholar
Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Tribunal’s Powers versus Party Autonomy’, in Muchlinski, Peter T., Ortino, Federico, and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1207–44.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, ‘Mixing Apples and Hand Grenades: The Logical Limit of Applying Human Rights Norms to Armed Conflict’ (2010) 1 Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 52–94.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey and Schoettler, James A., Jr., ‘Targeting and Civilian Risk Mitigation: The Essential Role of Precautionary Measures’ (2015) 223 Military Law Review 785–842.Google Scholar
Council on Foreign Relations, The Postwar Settlement of Property Rights (Council on Foreign Relations, 1945).Google Scholar
Cox, Johanne M., Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Crawford, Emily, Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Crawford, Emily and Pert, Alison, International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments: Between Clinical Isolation and Systemic Integration’, in Hofmann, Rainer and Tams, Christian J. (eds.), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Nomos, 2011), pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th ed., Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Creasy, Edward Shepherd, First Platform of International Law (John van Voorst, 1876).Google Scholar
Crivelli, Pramila and Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona, ‘Separating the Political from the Economic: The Russia – Traffic in Transit Panel Report’ (2021) 20 World Trade Review 582–605.Google Scholar
Crow, Kevin and Lorenzoni Escobar, Lina, ‘International Corporate Obligations, Human Rights, and the Urbaser Standard: Breaking New Ground?’ (2018) 36 Boston University International Law Journal 87–118.Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Articulating International Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law: Conciliatory Interpretation under the Guise of Conflict of Norm-Resolution’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), The Interpretation and Application of the European Convention of Human Rights: Legal and Practical Implications (Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Dam-de Jong, Daniëlla, International Law and Governance of Natural Resources in Conflict and Post-Conflict Situations (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Das, Hans, ‘Restoring Property Rights in the Aftermath of War’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 429–43.Google Scholar
Davitti, Daria, ‘Proportionality and Human Rights Protection in International Investment Arbitration: What’s Left Hanging in the Balance?’ (2020) 89 Nordic Journal of International Law 343–63.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Martin, ‘The Obligation of Non-Recognition of an Unlawful Situation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 677–86.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Martin, Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Daza-Clark, Ana Maria and Behn, Daniel, ‘Between War and Peace: Intermittent Armed Conflict and Investment Arbitration’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 319–61.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, ‘Human Rights Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2017) 50 Revue Belge de Droit International 591–611.Google Scholar
De Koker, Cedric, ‘Hassan v United Kingdom: The Interaction of Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law with Regard to the Deprivation of Liberty in Armed Conflicts’ (2015) 31 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 90–96.Google Scholar
De Preux, Jean, ‘Article 91 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 1053–58.Google Scholar
De Stefano, Carlo, Attribution in International Law and Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
De Vriese, Kit, ‘The Application of Investment Treaties in Occupied or Annexed Territories and “Frozen” Conflicts: Tabula Rasa or Occupata?’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 319–58.Google Scholar
Demirkol, Berk, ‘Non-Treaty Claims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denza, Eileen and Brooks, Shelagh, ‘Investment Protection Treaties: United Kingdom Experience’ (1987) 36 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 908–23.Google Scholar
Desierto, Diane, ‘The Reviewability of the Security Exception in GATT Article XXI in Russia – Traffic in Transit: Implications for South China Sea Investment Disputes in GATT Article XXI-type Clauses in ASEAN Regional Investment Treaties’ (EJIL:Talk!, 9 April 2019), www.ejiltalk.org/wto-panel-in-russia-traffic-in-transit-declares-gatt-article-xxi-is-reviewable/.Google Scholar
Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Devedas, Sharmila, Elbadawi, Ibrahim, and Loayza, Norman V., ‘Growth after War in Syria’ (2019), World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper No. 8967, https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/424551565105634645/growth-after-war-in-syria.Google Scholar
Diab, Nader I., ‘Targeting Members of Non-State Armed Groups in NIACs: An Attempt to Reconcile International Human Rights Law with IHL’s (De Facto) Status-Based Targeting’, in Heffes, Ezequiel, Kotlik, Marcos D., and Ventura, Manuel J. (eds.), International Humanitarian Law and Non-State Actors: Debates, Law and Practice (T.M.C. Asser Press; Springer, 2020), pp. 321–49.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John, ‘Enemy-Owned Property: Restitution or Confiscation?’ (1943) 22 Foreign Affairs 126–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickstein, Michael E., ‘Revitalizing the International Law Governing Concession Agreements’ (1988) 6 International Tax & Business Lawyer 54–91.Google Scholar
DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 48–89.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Military Necessity’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2015), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (6th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘The Settlement of War-Related Claims: Does International Law Recognize a Victim’s Private Right of Action? Lessons after 1945’ (2002) 20 Berkeley Journal of International Law 296–341.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today’s Contours’ (2013) 12 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 7–33.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Domke, Martin, Trading with the Enemy in World War II (Central Book Co., 1943).Google Scholar
Dorp, Mark van, Multinationals and Conflict: International Principles and Guidelines for Corporate Responsibility in Conflict-Affected Areas (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations, 2014).Google Scholar
Dörr, Oliver, ‘Article 31’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 521–70.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?’ (2006) 88 International Review of the Red Cross 881–904.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2003) 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151–289.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, ‘Property, Investment, and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 363–406.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary, ‘The Plea of Illegality in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 155–86.Google Scholar
Downey, William Gerald, ‘The Law of War and Military Necessity’ (1953) 47 American Journal of International Law 251–62.Google Scholar
Drahozal, Christopher R. and Gibson, Christopher S. (eds.), The Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor-State & International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Draper, G.I.A.D., ‘Humanitarian Law and Human Rights’ (1979) Acta Juridica 193–206.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict’ (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 310–55.Google Scholar
Dugan, Christopher F. and others, Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick, Fair and Equitable Treatment: Its Interaction with the Minimum Standard and Its Customary Status (Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick, ‘Requiem for Crimea: Why Tribunals Should Have Declined Jurisdiction over the Claims of Ukrainian Investors against Russian under the Ukraine–Russia BIT’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 506–33.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick, Rebellions and Civil Wars: State Responsibility for the Conduct of Insurgents (Cambridge University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick and Dumas-Aubin, Gabrielle, ‘When and How Allegations of Human Rights Violations can be Raised in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 13 Journal of World Investment & Trade 349–72.Google Scholar
Dupont, Pierre-Emmanuel, ‘Legality of Economic Sanctions under International Law and EU Law: The Case of Iran’ (2011) 4 Indian Journal of International Economic Law 48–86.Google Scholar
Dupont, Pierre-Emmanuel, ‘The Arbitration of Disputes Related to Foreign Investments Affected by Unilateral Sanctions’, in Marossi, Ali Z. and Bassett, Marisa R. (eds.), Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2015), pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Dürr, Olivier, ‘Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict: Problems of Applicability’ (1987) 24 Journal of Peace Research 263–73.Google Scholar
Dutch Government, ‘Treaty Database – Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe’ (2021), https://treatydatabase.overheid.nl/en/Verdrag/Details/004285_b.html.Google Scholar
Dybnis, Ari, ‘Was the Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission Merely a Zero-Sum Game? Exposing the Limits of Arbitration in Resolving Violent Transnational Conflict’ (2011) 33 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 255–86.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, ‘Responsibility for Damages to Persons and Property of Aliens in Undeclared War’ (1938) 32 American Society of International Law Proceedings 124–46.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Pia, ‘The Zombie ISDS: Rebranded as ICS, Rights for Corporations to Sue States Refuse to Die’ (Corporate Europe Observatory and others, 2016), https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/attachments/the_zombie_isds_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, Dominik, ‘Sovereignty, National Security and International Treaty Law: The Standard of Review of International Courts and Tribunals with regard to “Security Exceptions”’ (2010) 48 Archiv des Völkerrechts 431–66.Google Scholar
Elagab, Omer Yousif, The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law (Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
El-Hosseny, Farouk and Devine, Patrick, ‘Contributory Fault under International Law: A Gateway for Human Rights in ISDS?’ (2020) 35 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 105–29.Google Scholar
Elrifai, Silke Noa, ‘Equity-Based Discretion and the Anatomy of Damages Assessment in Investment Treaty Law’ (2017) 34 Journal of International Arbitration 835–88.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Mikael, Targeting Peace: Understanding UN and EU Targeted Sanctions (Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar
Escarcena, Sebastián López, Indirect Expropriation in International Law (Edward Elgar, 2014).Google Scholar
European Union, ‘EU Restrictive Measures against Russia over Ukraine (since 2014)’ (2022), www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/restrictive-measures-against-russia-over-ukraine/.Google Scholar
Evans, Christine, The Right to Reparation in International Law for Victims of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Fach Gómez, Katia, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019).Google Scholar
Falkowska, Martyna, Bedjaoui, Mohammed, and Leidgens, Tamara, ‘Article 44 VCLT’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011), vol. 2, pp. 1046–61.Google Scholar
Farrall, Jeremy Matam, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fauchald, Ole Kristian and Behn, Daniel, ‘World Peace and International Investment: The Role of Investment Treaties and Arbitration’, in Bailliet, Cecilia M. (ed.), Research Handbook on International Law and Peace (Edward Elgar, 2019), pp. 219–43.Google Scholar
Feighery, Timothy J., Gibson, Christopher S., and Rajah, Trevor M. (eds.), War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Designing Compensation After Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Feilchenfeld, Ernst Hermann, The International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1942).Google Scholar
Feinstein, Barry A., ‘The Applicability of the Regime of Human Rights in Times of Armed Conflict and Particularly to Occupied Territories: The Case of Israel’s Security Barrier’ (2005) 4 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 238–302.Google Scholar
Fellmeth, Aaron, ‘Questioning Civilian Immunity’ (2008) 43 Texas International Law Journal 453–97.Google Scholar
Fenrick, W.J., ‘Targeting and Proportionality during the NATO Bombing Campaign against Yugoslavia’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 489–502.Google Scholar
Firoozmand, Mahmoud Reza and Zamani, Javad, ‘Force Majeure in International Contracts: Current Trends and How International Arbitration Practice Is Responding’ (2017) 33 Arbitration International 395–413.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald G., ‘The Juridical Clauses of the Peace Treaties’ (1948) 73 Recueil des Cours 255–367.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaties in Motion: The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, Carl-August and Simma, Bruno, ‘Article 13’, in Simma, Bruno and others (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012), vol. 1, pp. 525–51.Google Scholar
Forero, Juan, ‘Burdened Colombians Back Tax to Fight Rebels’ (The New York Times, 8 September 2002), www.nytimes.com/2002/09/08/world/burdened-colombians-back-tax-to-fight-rebels.html.Google Scholar
Fortin, Katharine, The Accountability of Armed Groups under Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Foster, Caroline E., ‘Burden of Proof in International Courts and Tribunals’ (2010) 29 Australian Year Book of International Law 27–86.Google Scholar
Foster, George K., ‘Recovering “Protection and Security”: The Treaty Standard’s Obscure Origins, Forgotten Meaning, and Key Current Significance’ (2012) 45 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1095–1156.Google Scholar
Foty, Cherine, ‘Impact of the Arab Spring on the International Arbitration Landscape’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 26 July 2019), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/07/26/impact-of-the-arab-spring-on-the-international-arbitration-landscape/.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D., Arbitration Costs: Myths and Realities in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Freeman, Alwyn V., ‘Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces’ (1955) 88 Recueil des Cours 263–416.Google Scholar
Freeman, Alwyn V., Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces (A.W. Sijthoff, 1957).Google Scholar
French, Duncan, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 281–314.Google Scholar
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, ‘Investments in Libya: Potential Claims under Bilateral Investment Treaties and Political Risk Insurance Policies’ (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, March 2011), www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c732662c-f387-45d8-bb26-03b58f9c0a9b.Google Scholar
Gagliani, Gabriele, ‘Supervening Impossibility of Performance and the Effects of Armed Conflict on Investment Treaties: Any Room for Manoeuvre?’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 341–61.Google Scholar
Gallus, Nick, ‘The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection’ (2005) 6 Journal of World Investment & Trade 711–29.Google Scholar
Gallus, Nick, ‘The “Fair and Equitable Treatment” Standard and the Circumstances of the Host State’, in Brown, Chester and Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 223–45.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard, Treaty Interpretation (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Garner, Bryan A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed., Thompson Reuter, 2014).Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 231–320.Google Scholar
Gastrell, Lindsay and Le Cannu, Paul-Jean, ‘Procedural Requirements of “Denial-of-Benefits” Clauses in Investment Treaties: A Review of Arbitral Decisions’ (2015) 30 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 78–97.Google Scholar
Gates, Scott and others, ‘Development Consequences of Armed Conflict’ (2012) 40 World Development 1713–22.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo, ‘Commerce, Conquest, and Wartime Confiscation’ (2006) 31 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 709–39.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo, ‘War’s Legacy in International Investment Law’ (2009) 11 International Community Law Review 353–86.Google Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade 691–716.Google Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Foreign Investment and Measures Adopted on Grounds of Necessity: Towards a Common Understanding’ (2010) 7 Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (Hart, 2016).Google Scholar
Gerards, Janneke, General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Gertz, Geoffrey, Jandhyala, Srividya, and Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, ‘Legalization, Diplomacy, and Development: Do Investment Treaties De-Politicize Investment Disputes?’ (2018) 107 World Development 239–52.Google Scholar
Ghouri, Ahmad Ali, Interaction and Conflict of Treaties in Investment Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2015).Google Scholar
Giacca, Gilles, Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Gibson, Christopher S. and Drahozal, Christopher R., ‘Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal Precedent in Investor-State Arbitration’, in Drahozal, Christopher R. and Gibson, Christopher S. (eds.), The Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal at 25: The Cases Everyone Needs to Know for Investor-State & International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Article 61’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 1127–42.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Article 62’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 1143–81.Google Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘Protection of Civilians in the Conduct of Hostilities’, in Liivoja, Rain and McCormack, Tim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Law of Armed Conflict (Routledge, 2016), pp. 157–80.Google Scholar
Gioia, Andrea, ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Monitoring Compliance with Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict’, in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: Pas de Deux (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 201–49.Google Scholar
Glennon, Michael J., ‘How International Rules Die’ (2005) 93 Georgetown Law Journal 939–91.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, ‘The Obama Administration and Targeting “War-Sustaining” Objects in Noninternational Armed Conflict’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 663–79.Google Scholar
Gordon, Kathryn and Pohl, Joachim, ‘Investment Treaties over Time: Treaty Practice and Interpretation in a Changing World’ (2015), OECD Working Paper on International Investment 2015/02, dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js7rhd8sq7h-en.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, Anastasios, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 31–57.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, Anastasios, ‘Investors’ Rights qua Human Rights? Revisiting the ‘Direct’/‘Derivative’ Rights Debate’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), The Interpretation and Application of the European Convention of Human Rights: Legal and Practical Implications (Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 147–82.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘The Right to Life and the Relationship between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law’, in Tomuschat, Christian, Lagrange, Evelyne, and Oeter, Stefan (eds.), The Right to Life (Nijhoff, 2010), pp. 123–50.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera and Gaggioli, Gloria, ‘The Relationship Between International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: An Overview’, in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 77–103.Google Scholar
Grabowski, Alex, ‘The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini’ (2014) 15 Chicago Journal of International Law 287–309.Google Scholar
Graf, Andreas and Iff, Andrea, ‘Respecting Human Rights in Conflict Regions: How to Avoid the “Conflict Spiral”’ (2017) 2 Business and Human Rights Journal 109–33.Google Scholar
Greenman, Kathryn, State Responsibility and Rebels: The History and Legacy of Protecting Investment Against Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’ (1987) 36 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 283–306.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
Grignon, Julia, ‘The Beginning of Application of International Humanitarian Law: A Discussion of a Few Challenges’ (2014) 96 International Review of the Red Cross 139–62.Google Scholar
Gritsenko, Maria, ‘Relevance of the Host State’s Development Status in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 341–51.Google Scholar
Gudgeon, K. Scott, ‘United States Bilateral Investment Treaties: Comments on Their Origin, Purposes, and General Treatment Standards’ (1986) 4 International Tax & Business Lawyer 105–35.Google Scholar
Guntrip, Edward, ‘Urbaser v Argentina: The Origins of a Host State Human Rights Counterclaim in ICSID Arbitration?’ (EJIL:Talk!, 10 February 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/urbaser-v-argentina-the-origins-of-a-host-state-human-rights-counterclaim-in-icsid-arbitration/.Google Scholar
Guntrip, Edward, ‘Private Actors, Public Goods and Responsibility for the Right to Water in International Investment Law: An Analysis of Urbaser v. Argentina’ (2018) 1 Brill Open Law 1–24.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael J., ‘Vital Interests and the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT’s Security Exception’ (1991) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 558–620.Google Scholar
Hall, William Edward, International Law (Clarendon Press, 1880).Google Scholar
Happ, Richard, ‘The Legal Status of the Investor vis-a-vis the European Communities: Some Salient Thoughts’ (2007) 10 International Arbitration Law Review 74–81.Google Scholar
Happ, Richard and Wuschka, Sebastian, ‘Horror vacui: Or Why Investment Treaties Should Apply to Illegally Annexed Territories’ (2016) 33 Journal of International Arbitration 245–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, James, ‘The Life and Death of BITs: Legal Issues Concerning Survival Clauses and the Termination of Investment Treaties’ (2012) 13 Journal of World Investment & Trade 928–50.Google Scholar
Harvard Research in International Law, ‘Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 American Journal of International Law Supplement 653–1226.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo, ‘Requirements of Military Necessity in International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law’ (2010) 28 Boston University International Law Journal 39–140.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo, ‘Contextualizing Military Necessity’ (2013) 27 Emory International Law Review 189–283.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo, Military Necessity: The Art, Morality and Law of War (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Heath, J. Benton, ‘Trade, Security, and Stewardship (Part II): Making Legal Space to Adjudicate Security Matters’ (International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 6 May 2019), https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2019/05/guest-post-trade-security-and-stewardship-part-ii-making-legal-space-to-adjudicate-security-matters.html.Google Scholar
Heath, J. Benton, ‘The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order’ (2020) 129 Yale Law Journal 1020–98.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, Tuomas and Faix, Martin, ‘The Need for Unified Understanding of “Military Objective” in the Context of Human Shields and Passive Precautions Concepts’ (2016) 16 International and Comparative Law Review 49–66.Google Scholar
Heintze, Hans-Joachim, ‘Theories on the Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law’, in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Exiting Treaties’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 1579–1648.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Terminating Treaties’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 634–50.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. and Meyer, Timothy, ‘The Evolution of Codification: A Principal-Agent Theory of the International Law Commission’s Influence’, in Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 305–31.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, Mass Expulsion in Modern International Law and Practice (Nijhoff, 1995).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Nohle, Ellen, ‘Concurrent Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law Revisited’ (2018) 12 Human Rights & International Legal Discourse 23–43.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 15 Journal of International Economic Law 223–55.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘Should Investment Treaties Contain Public Policy Exceptions?’ (2018) 59 Boston College Law Review 2825–44.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘Investment Treaty Security Exceptions, Necessity and Self-Defence in the Context of Armed Conflict’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 319–40.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘Permission to Act: The Legal Character of General and Security Exceptions in International Trade and Investment Law’ (2020) 69 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 557–84.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline, ‘Scope Limitation or Affirmative Defence? The Purpose and Role of Investment Treaty Exception Clauses’, in Paddeu, Federica and Bartels, Lorand (eds.), Exceptions and Defences in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 363–74.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ian, The Contemporary Law of Targeting: Military Objectives, Proportionality and Precautions in Attack under Additional Protocol I (Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar
Hentrei, Simon and Soley, Ximena, ‘Force Majeure’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2011), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Hernández, Gleider I., ‘The Interaction between Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Interpretation of Full Protection and Security Clauses’, in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 21–50.Google Scholar
Hessbruegge, Jan Arno, ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 265–306.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, Thomas C. III, ‘The Fighting’s Done, Now Pay Me: Investment Treaties, War, And State Liability’ (2021) 54 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 995–1040.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, ‘Conflicting Obligations in International Investment Law: Investment Tribunals’ Perspective’, in Tomer, Broude and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity – Essays in Honour of Professor Ruth Lapidoth (Hart, 2008), pp. 323–43.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Moshe, ‘Interactions between Investment and Non-Investment Obligations’, in Muchlinski, Peter T., Ortino, Federico, and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 154–81.Google Scholar
Ho, Jean, State Responsibility for Breaches of Investment Contracts (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Ho, Jean, ‘The Creation of Elusive Investor Responsibility’ (2019) 113 American Journal of International Law Unbound 10–15.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil (Andrew Crooke, 1651).Google Scholar
Hobér, Kaj and Fellenbaum, Joshua, ‘Political Risk Insurance and Financing of Foreign Direct Investment’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 1517–84.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K., ‘Indirect Expropriation’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 151–70.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K., ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 28 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 438–53.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K., ‘Denial of Benefits’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 598–613.Google Scholar
Hollis, Duncan B., ‘Russia Suspends CFE Treaty Participation’ (23 July 2007) 11(19) American Society of International Law Insights, www.asil.org/insights/volume/11/issue/19/russia-suspends-cfe-treaty-participation.Google Scholar
Hollis, Duncan B., ‘Treaty Clauses’, in Hollis, Duncan B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 655–770.Google Scholar
Holtzmann, Howard M. and Kristjánsdóttir, Edda, International Mass Claims Processes: Legal and Practical Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Howse, Rob, ‘ICSID Arbitrators Turn Investment Treaty into Insurance Policy Against Terrorism’ (International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 7 March 2017), https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2017/03/icsid-arbitrators-turn-investment-treaty-into-insurance-policy-against-terrorism.html.Google Scholar
Hughes, David, ‘Differentiating the Corporation: Accountability and International Humanitarian Law’ (2020) 42 Michigan Journal of International Law 47–104.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, World Report 2015: Events of 2014 (Human Rights Watch, 2015).Google Scholar
Hurst, Cecil J.B., ‘The Effect of War on Treaties’ (1921–22) 2 British Yearbook of International Law 37–47.Google Scholar
Hyde, Charles K., Arsenal of Democracy: The American Automobile Industry in World War II (Wayne State University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Institute de Droit International, ‘Règlement concernant les effets de la guerre sur les traités’ (1912) 25 Annuaire de l’ Institut de Droit International 648–50.Google Scholar
Institute de Droit International, ‘The Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties’ (1986) 61(2) Annuaire de l’ Institut de Droit International 278–83.Google Scholar
International Bar Association, ‘IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration’, Adopted by a Resolution of the IBA Council, 17 December 2020 (International Bar Association, 2021), https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=def0807b-9fec-43ef-b624-f2cb2af7cf7b.Google Scholar
International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Force Majeure Clause 2003, ICC Hardship Clause 2003 (International Chamber of Commerce Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘How is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law?’ (2008), Opinion Paper, www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2009).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts’ (2015), Report 32IC/15/11, http://rcrcconference.org/app//uploads/2015/10/32IC-Report-on-IHL-and-challenges-of-armed-conflicts.pdf.Google Scholar
International Law Association Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘Second Report’ (2016) 77 International Law Association Reports of Conferences 1062–1117.Google Scholar
International Law Association Study Group on the Conduct of Hostilities in the 21st Century, ‘The Conduct of Hostilities and International Humanitarian Law: Challenges of 21st Century Warfare’ (2017) 93 International Law Studies 322–88.Google Scholar
Ioffe, Yulia, ‘Termination of the Treaty of Friendship between Ukraine and Russia – Too Little Too Late?’ (Opinio Juris, 1 May 2019), http://opiniojuris.org/2019/05/01/termination-of-the-treaty-of-friendship-between-ukraine-and-russia-too-little-too-late-%EF%BB%BF/.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Tomoko, ‘Counterclaims and the Rule of Law in Investment Arbitration’ (2019) 113 American Journal of International Law Unbound 33–37.Google Scholar
Islam, Rumana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard in International Investment Arbitration: Developing Countries in Context (Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka, The Concept of Military Objectives in International Law and Targeting Practice (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Jacob, Marc, ‘Investments, Bilateral Treaties’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2014), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Jacob, Marc and Schill, Stephan W., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Content, Practice, Method’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 700–63.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Martin, Contributory Fault and Investor Misconduct in Investment Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Jenks, C. Wilfred, ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 401–53.Google Scholar
Jenks, Chris, ‘Detention under the Law of Armed Conflict’, in Liivoja, Rain and McCormack, Tim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Law of Armed Conflict (Routledge, 2016), pp. 301–16.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert Yewdall and Watts, Arthur Desmond, Oppenheim’s International Law (9th ed., Oxford University Press, 2008), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Jensen, Eric Talbot, ‘Precautions against the Effects of Attacks in Urban Areas’ (2016) 98 International Review of the Red Cross 147–75.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C, ‘Should International Law Recognize an Intermediate Status between Peace and War?’ (1954) 48 American Journal of International Law 98–103.Google Scholar
Jeutner, Valentin, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law: The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Jia, Bing Bing, ‘“Protected Property” and Its Protection in International Humanitarian Law’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 131–53.Google Scholar
Jiménez de Aréchaga, Eduardo, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ (1978) 159 Recueil des Cours 1–344.Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, ‘International Human Rights Law in Time of Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 656–74.Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek, Maogoto, Jackson N., and Solomon, Solon (eds.), Applying International Humanitarian Law in Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Bodies: International and Domestic Aspects (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johansen, Sigrid Redse, The Military Commander’s Necessity: The Law of Armed Conflict and Its Limits (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
John-Hopkins, Michael, The Rule of Law in Crisis and Conflict Grey Zones: Regulating the Use of Force in a Global Information Environment (Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lise and Sachs, Lisa, ‘International Investment Agreements, 2011–2012: A Review of Trends and New Approaches’, in Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2012–2013 (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 219–61.Google Scholar
Johnson, O. Thomas, Jr., and Gimblett, Jonathan, ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’, in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010–2011 (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 649–92.Google Scholar
Jones, William K., ‘Confiscation: A Rationale of the Law of Takings’ (1995) 24 Hofstra Law Review 1–88.Google Scholar
Jones Day, ‘Companies With Investments and Businesses in Ukraine and Russia: The Importance of Investment Treaties’ (March 2022), www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2022/03/investment-treaties-in-ukraine-and-russia.Google Scholar
Joshi, Riddhi Dhananjay and Gurpur, Shashikala, ‘The Silent Spring of Human Rights in Investment Arbitration: Jurisprudence Constante through Case-Law Trajectory’ (2020) 36 Arbitration International 557–70.Google Scholar
Junngam, Nartnirun, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in International Investment Law: What and Who is Investment Fully (?) Protected and Secured From?’ (2018) 7 American University Business Law Review 1–100.Google Scholar
Junod, Sylvie-Stoyanka, ‘Article 13 AP II’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 1447–53.Google Scholar
Kälin, Walter, ‘Aliens, Expulsion and Deportation’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2010), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, ‘State Responsibility for Warlike Acts of the Armed Forces’ (1991) 40 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 827–58.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays (Nijhoff, 2007).Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits and Zegveld, Liesbeth, Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Oil’s Well That Ends Well? Critical Comments on the Merits Judgement in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 695–718.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, International Investment Law and Legal Theory: Expropriation and the Fragmentation of Sources (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Kegel, Gerhard, Rupp, Hans, and Zweigert, Konrad, Die Einwirkung des Krieges auf Verträge in der Rechtsprechung Deutschlands, Frankreichs, Englands und der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika (de Gruyter, 1941).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Science and Politics’ (1951) 45 American Political Science Review 641–61.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart & Co., 1952).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Manz, 1979).Google Scholar
Kempees, Peter, ‘Hard Power’ and the European Convention on Human Rights (Brill Nijhoff, 2021).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, Of War and Law (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kent, Avidan and Harrington, Alexandra R., ‘The Plea of Necessity under Customary International Law: A Critical Review in Light of the Argentine Cases’, in Brown, Chester and Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 246–70.Google Scholar
Kern, Carsten, ‘Transfer of Funds’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 870–86.Google Scholar
Khachvani, David, ‘Compensation for Unlawful Expropriation: Targeting the Illegality’ (2017) 22 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 385–403.Google Scholar
Kidane, Won, ‘Civil Liability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law: The Jurisprudence of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission in the Hague’ (2007) 25 Wisconsin International Law Journal 23–87.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David, Out of the Mountains: The Coming Age of the Urban Guerrilla (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kim, Heejin, Regime Accommodation in International Law: Human Rights in International Economic Law and Policy (Brill, 2016).Google Scholar
Kim, Julie, ‘Balancing Regulatory Interests through an Exceptions Framework under the Right to Regulate Provision in International Investment Agreements’ (2018) 50 George Washington International Law Review 289–356.Google Scholar
King & Spalding, ‘Client Alert: Crisis in Libya: What Legal Options are Available to Oil and Gas Companies?’ (17 May 2011), www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/crisis-in-libya-what-legal-options-are-23513/.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, David D., ‘Fighting Shortages, Syrian Civilians Take Reins in Rebel Areas’ (The New York Times, 28 February 2013), www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/world/middleeast/syrian-civilians-take-reins-in-test-of-self-government.html.Google Scholar
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, Astrid, The International Legal Personality of the Individual (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Reluctant Grundnormen: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’, in Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, and Vogiatzi, Maria (eds.), Time, History and International Law (Nijhoff, 2007), pp. 141–61.Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 43–78.Google Scholar
Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘Sequestration’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2013), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2599–2660.Google Scholar
Koivurova, Timo, ‘Due Diligence’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2010), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliana and Sobotta, Christoph, ‘The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 1015–24.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘Does Article 103 of the Charter of the United Nations Apply Only to Decisions or Also to Authorizations Adopted by the Security Council?’ (2004) 64 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 21–35.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, The Law of Treaties: An Introduction (Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Kolo, Abba and Wälde, Thomas W., ‘Capital Transfer Restrictions under Modern Investment Treaties’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 205–43.Google Scholar
Koloma Beck, Teresa, The Normality of Civil War: Armed Groups and Everyday Life in Angola (Campus Verlag, 2012).Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara and Nau, Allison, ‘Exit, No Exit’ (2010) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 81–119.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan, ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’ (2001) 55 International Organization 761–99.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Legal Theory and Doctrine’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2007), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Legacy of the Nineteenth Century’, in Armstrong, David (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Law (Routledge, 2009), pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi, ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553–79.Google Scholar
Kotuby, Charles T. and Sobota, Luke A., General Principles of Law and International Due Process: Principles and Norms Applicable in Transnational Disputes (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Koutroulis, Vaios, ‘Internment of Civilians in Armed Conflicts’ (2015) 45 Collegium 39–47.Google Scholar
Krähenmann, Sandra, ‘Positive Obligations in Human Rights Law During Armed Conflicts’, in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 170–87.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘The Relevance of Economic and Political Conditions for Protection under Investment Treaties’ (2011) 10 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 383–404.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Are Investment Treaty Standards Flexible Enough to Meet the Needs of Developing Countries?’, in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 330–40.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 790–806.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Expropriation’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 959–1030.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula, ‘Evaluating Social Benefits and Costs of Investment Treaties: Depoliticization of Investment Disputes’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 14–28.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, ‘A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship Between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study’ (2006) 11 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 265–91.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, ‘Article 73’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 1331–65.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, Peters, Anne, and Kreuzer, Leonhard, ‘Due Diligence in the International Legal Order: Dissecting the Leitmotif of Current Accountability Debates’, in Krieger, Heike, Peters, Anne, and Kreuzer, Leonhard (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, ‘Article 39’, in Simma, Bruno and others (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012), vol. 2, pp. 1272–96.Google Scholar
Krumbiegel, Felix, ‘The Applicability of the Russia-Ukraine Bilateral Investment Treaty to Crimea in the Light of the Duty of Non-recognition in International Law’ (2021) 38 Journal of International Arbitration 645–670.Google Scholar
Kulesza, Joanna, Due Diligence in International Law (Brill Nijhoff, 2016).Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘The Use and Abuse of WTO Law in Investor-State Arbitration: Competition and its Discontents’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 749–71.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325–71.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen, ‘On Foreign Investor “Privilege” and the Limits of the Law: A Reply to Ivar Alvik’ (2020) 31 European Journal of International Law 313–19.Google Scholar
La Pradelle, Albert de, ‘The Effect of War on Private Law Treaties’ (1948–49) 2 International Law Quarterly 555–76.Google Scholar
Lalive, Pierre and Halonen, Laura, ‘On the Availability of Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2011) 2 Czech Yearbook of International Law 141–56.Google Scholar
Landais, Claire and Bass, Léa, ‘Reconciling the Rules of International Humanitarian Law with the Rules of European Human Rights Law’ (2015) 97 International Review of the Red Cross 1295–1311.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Doctrine of Non-Justiciable Disputes in International Law’ (1928) Economica 277–317.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Limits of the Operation of the Law of War’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 206–43.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War’ (1952) 29 British Yearbook of International Law 360–82.Google Scholar
Lavopa, Federico M., Barreiros, Lucas E., and Bruno, M. Victoria, ‘How to Kill a BIT and not Die Trying: Legal and Political Challenges of Denouncing or Renegotiating Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2013) 16 Journal of International Economic Law 869–91.Google Scholar
Lavrysen, Laurens, ‘Positive Obligations in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (2014) 7 Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal 94–115.Google Scholar
Lavrysen, Laurens, Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J., The Principles of International Law (7th ed., Heath, 1910).Google Scholar
Lawry-White, Merryl, ‘International Investment Arbitration in a Jus Post Bellum Framework’ (2015) 16 Journal of World Investment & Trade 633–65.Google Scholar
Layton, Robert, ‘The Effect of Measures Short of War on Treaties’ (1962) 30 University of Chicago Law Review 96–119.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong-Shik, ‘Three Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: The Conundrum of the US Steel and Aluminum Tariffs’ (2019) 18 World Trade Review 481–501.Google Scholar
Leiæ, Johann Ruben and Paulus, Andreas, ‘Article 103’, in Simma, Bruno and others (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012), vol. 2, pp. 2110–37.Google Scholar
Lenoir, James J., ‘The Effect of War on Bilateral Treaties: with Special Reference to Reciprocal Inheritance Treaty Provisions’ (1946) 34 Georgetown Law Journal 129–77.Google Scholar
Levashova, Yulia, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment and Investor’s Due Diligence Under International Investment Law’ (2020) 67 Netherlands International Law Review 233–55.Google Scholar
Lévesque, Céline, ‘The Inclusion of GATT Article XX Exceptions in IIAs: A Potentially Risky Policy’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy: World Trade Forum (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 363–70.Google Scholar
Levine, Eugenia, ‘Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third-Party Participation’ (2011) 29 Berkeley Journal of International Law 200–24.Google Scholar
Lexico Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2022), www.lexico.com.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., The Human Rights of Aliens in Contemporary International Law (Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Lippold, Matthias, ‘Between Humanization and Humanitarization? Detention in Armed Conflicts and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2016) 76 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 53–95.Google Scholar
Loets, Adrian, ‘Enemies and Enemy Subjects’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2013), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Lord Hill, Samantha, ‘Arbitration of Disputes Arising in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones: Managing the Risks’, in Kalicki, Jean E. and Abdel-Raouf, Mohamed (eds.), Evolution and Adaptation: The Future of International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2019), pp. 897–916.Google Scholar
Lorz, Ralph Alexander, ‘Protection and Security: (Including the NAFTA Approach)’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 764–89.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 405–11.Google Scholar
Mačák, Kubo, Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Macdonald, Ronald St. John, ‘Derogations under Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1997) 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 225–67.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah Cherian, Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War (Cornell University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Mann, F.A., ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1982) 52 British Yearbook of International Law 241–54.Google Scholar
Mantilla Blanco, Sebastián, Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law (Springer, 2019).Google Scholar
Marboe, Irmgard, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Marcoux, Jean-Michel and Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘Foreign Investors’ Responsibilities and Contributory Fault in Investment Arbitration’ (2020) 69 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 877–905.Google Scholar
Marcus, Philip, ‘Taking and Destruction of Property Under a Defense and War Program (Part 1)’ (1942) 27 Cornell Law Review 317–46.Google Scholar
Marcus, Philip, ‘Taking and Destruction of Property Under a Defense and War Program (Part 2)’ (1942) 27 Cornell Law Review 476–533.Google Scholar
Mares, Radu, ‘Corporate and State Responsibilities in Conflict-Affected Areas’ (2014) 83 Nordic Journal of International Law 293–345.Google Scholar
Marroni, Carlo, ‘Italia-Libia, trattato sospeso’ (Il Sole 24 Ore, 27 February 2011), https://st.ilsole24ore.com/art/notizie/2011-02-27/italialibia-trattato-sospeso-081205.shtml.Google Scholar
Martin, Ian, ‘The United Nations’ Role in the First Year of the Transition’, in Cole, Peter and McQuinn, Brian (eds.), The Libyan Revolution and its Aftermath (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 127–52.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., ‘Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions during the Falkland Islands Conflict’ (1992) 16 International Security 143–78.Google Scholar
Martini, Camille, ‘Avoiding the Planned Obsolescence of Modern International Investment Agreements: Can General Exception Mechanisms Be Improved, and How?’ (2018) 59 Boston College Law Review 2877–98.Google Scholar
Matheson, Michael J., International Civil Tribunals and Armed Conflict (Nijhoff, 2012).Google Scholar
Matz-Lück, Nele, ‘Norm Interpretation Across International Regimes: Competences and Legitimacy’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 201–34.Google Scholar
Maurer, Virginia G., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the “Divided Corporate Self”: The Case of Chiquita in Colombia’ (2009) 88 Journal of Business Ethics 595–603.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade in Goods (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
May, Larry, ‘Jus Post Bellum, Grotius, and Meionexia’, in Stahn, Carsten, Easterday, Jennifer S., and Iverson, Jens (eds.), Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundation (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 15–25.Google Scholar
Mayer, Lloyd Hitoshi, ‘Globalization Without a Safety Net: The Challenge of Protecting Cross-Border Funding of NGOs’ (2018) 102 Minnesota Law Review 1205–71.Google Scholar
Mayorga, Ofilio J., ‘Arbitrating War: Military Necessity as a Defense to the Breach of Investment Treaty Obligations’ (2013), Harvard Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, Policy Brief, www.hpcrresearch.org/sites/default/files/publications/081213%20ARBITRATING%20WAR%20%28final%29.pdf.Google Scholar
McDonald, Avril and Brollowski, Hanna, ‘Requisitions’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2011), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
McDonald, Avril and Brollowski, Hanna, ‘Security’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2011), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S. and Feliciano, Florentino P., ‘The Initiation of Coercion: A Multi-Temporal Analysis’ (1958) 52 American Journal of International Law 241–59.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Stuart Hull, Legal Effect of World War II on Treaties of the United States (Nijhoff, 1958).Google Scholar
McKean, Warwick, Equality and Discrimination under International Law (Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 279–319.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 361–401.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence, and Weiniger, , Matthew, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
McMeel, Gerard, The Construction of Contracts (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold Duncan, International Law Opinions: Selected and Annotated (Cambridge University Press, 1956), vol. 2.Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold Duncan, The Law of Treaties (Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold Duncan and Watts, Arthur Desmond, The Legal Effects of War (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
McRae, Donald Malcolm, ‘Countermeasures and Investment Arbitration’, in Kinnear, Meg and others (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Kluwer Law International, 2015), pp. 495–504.Google Scholar
Megiddo, Tamar, ‘Beyond Fragmentation: On International Law’s Integrationist Forces’ (2019) 44 Yale Journal of International Law 115–48.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Mixed Claims Commissions and the Once Centrality of the Protection of Aliens’, in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Experiments in International Adjudication: Historical Accounts (Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. 127–49.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Menkes, Marcin J., ‘The Legality of US Investment Sanctions against Iran before the ICJ: A Watershed Moment for the Essential Security and Necessity Exceptions’ (2018) 56 Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Annuaire canadien de droit international 328–64.Google Scholar
Merkouris, Panos, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadow in Plato’s Cave (Brill Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law 239–78.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, 2022), www.merriam-webster.com.Google Scholar
Milanović, Marko, ‘Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights?’ (2009) 20 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 69–131.Google Scholar
Milanović, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Miles, Kate, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Mistelis, Loukas A. and Baltag, Crina Mihaela, ‘Denial of Benefits and Article 17 of the Energy Charter Treaty’ (2009) 113 Penn State Law Review 1301–21.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D. and Henckels, Caroline, ‘Variations on a Theme: Comparing the Concept of “Necessity” in International Investment Law and WTO Law’ (2013) 14 Chicago Journal of International Law 93–164.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Heaton, David, and Henckels, Caroline, Non-Discrimination and the Role of Regulatory Purpose in International Trade and Investment Law (Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Munro, James, and Voon, Tania, ‘Importing WTO General Exceptions into International Investment Agreements: Proportionality, Myths and Risks’, in Sachs, Lisa, Johnson, Lise, and Coleman, Jesse (eds.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2017 (Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 305–55.Google Scholar
Moloo, Rahim and Khachaturian, Alex, ‘Foreign Investment in a Post-Conflict Environment’ (2009) 10 Journal of World Investment & Trade 341–58.Google Scholar
Monnheimer, Maria, Due Diligence Obligations in International Human Rights Law (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Moon, William J., ‘Essential Security Interests in International Investment Agreements’ (2012) 15 Journal of International Economic Law 481–502.Google Scholar
Mosk, Richard M. and Ginsburg, Tom, ‘Evidentiary Privileges in International Arbitration’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 345–85.Google Scholar
Mostafa, Ben, ‘The Sole Effects Doctrine, Police Powers and Indirect Expropriation under International Law’ (2008) 15 Australian International Law Journal 267–96.Google Scholar
Moussly, Omar, ‘Same Concept, Different Interpretation: The Full Protection and Security Standard in Practice’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 27 October 2019), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/10/27/same-concept-different-interpretation-the-full-protection-and-security-standard-in-practice/.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., ‘“Caveat Investor?”: The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 527–58.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., Multinational Enterprises and the Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., ‘Trends in International Investment Agreements: Balancing Investor Rights and the Right to Regulate. The Issue of National Security’, in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2008–2009 (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 35–78.Google Scholar
Mueller, Hannes and Tobias, Julia, ‘The Cost of Violence: Estimating the Economic Impact of Conflict’ (2016), International Growth Centre (IGC), Growth Brief No. 007, www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IGCJ5023_Economic_Cost_of_Conflict_Brief_2211_v7_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Mueller, Hannes, ‘The Economic Cost of Conflict’ (2013), International Growth Centre (IGC), Working Paper, www.iae.csic.es/investigatorsMaterial/a152611094820archivoPdf72447.pdf.Google Scholar
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, World Investment and Political Risk 2013 (World Bank, 2014).Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., Kidane, Won, and Snider, Thomas R., Litigating War: Arbitration of Civil Injury by the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Murray, Daragh, Practitioners’ Guide to Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista, International Investment Law: Text, Cases and Materials (2nd ed., Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations: A General History (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Nerlich, Volker, ‘Core Crimes and Transnational Business Corporations’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 895–908.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Rostam J. and Svetlicinii, Alexandr, ‘The Economic Sanctions over the Ukraine Conflict and the WTO: “Catch-XXI” and the Revival of the Debate on Security Exceptions’ (2015) 49 Journal of World Trade 891–914.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’ (2005) 20 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 1–57.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, ‘General Exceptions in International Investment Agreements’, in Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire, Gehring, Markus W., and Newcombe, Andrew (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Kluwer Law International, 2011), pp. 355–70.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew, ‘The Use of General Exceptions in IIAs: Increasing Legitimacy or Uncertainty?’, in Mestral, Armand de and Lévesque, Céline (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements (Routledge, 2013), pp. 267–83.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar
Nolan, Michael D. and Sourgens, Frédéric Gilles, ‘The Limits of Discretion? Self-Judging Emergency Clauses in International Investment Agreements’, in Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010–2011 (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 363–418.Google Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, ‘Alliance’s Statement on the Russian Federation’s “Suspension” of its CFE Obligations’ (12 December 2007) Press Release (2007) 139.Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Termination and Renegotiation of International Investment Agreements’, in Hindelang, Steffen and Krajewski, Markus (eds.), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 227–65.Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘The Other Side of Rights in the Processes of Constitutionalizing International Investment Law: Addressing Investors’ Obligations as a New Regulatory Experiment’ (2018), Rechtswissenschaftliche Beiträge der Hamburger Sozialökonomie No. 21, www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/fachbereich-sozoek/professuren/nowrot/archiv/heft-21-nowrot-obligations.pdf.Google Scholar
Oberleitner, Gerd, Human Rights in Armed Conflict: Law, Practice, Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Odermatt, Jed, ‘Between Law and Reality: “New Wars” and Internationalised Armed Conflict’ (2013) 5 Amsterdam Law Forum 19–32.Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan, ‘Methods and Means of Combat’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 115–230.Google Scholar
Olleson, Simon, ‘Attribution in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 457–83.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise (Longmans, Green and Co., 1906), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise (7th ed., Longmans, Green and Co., 1952), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence?’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 161–82.Google Scholar
Orellana Zabalza, Gabriel, The Principle of Systemic Integration: Towards a Coherent International Legal Order (LIT Verlag, 2012).Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘The Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Commentary to the Consolidated Text’ (1998) DAFFE/MAI(98)8/REV1.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘Multinational Enterprises in Situations of Violent Conflict and Widespread Human Rights Abuses’ (2002), OECD Working Paper on International Investment 2002/01, www.oecd.org/countries/myanmar/WP-2002_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘“Indirect Expropriation” and the “Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law’ (2004), OECD Working Paper on International Investment 2004/04, www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2004_4.pdf.Google Scholar
Ostřanský, Josef, ‘The Termination and Suspension of Bilateral Investment Treaties Due to an Armed Conflict’ (2015) 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 136–62.Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, ‘A Genealogy of Force Majeure in International Law’ (2012) 82 British Yearbook of International Law 381–494.Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, ‘Countermeasures’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2015), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica and Waibel, Michael, ‘Necessity 20 Years On: The Limits of Article 25 ARSIWA’ (2022) 37 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’ (2008) 79 British Yearbook of International Law 264–352.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration’, in Crawford, James and Nouwen, Sarah (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (Hart, 2012), vol. 3, pp. 271–82.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 617–47.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 73–107.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in International Investment Law’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 485–503.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘MFN Clauses and Substantive Treatment: A Law of Treaties Perspective of the “Conventional Wisdom”’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law Unbound 49–54.Google Scholar
Papp, Réka, ‘Representation of States in Investment Arbitrations Involving Governments Competing for International Recognition’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 246–79.Google Scholar
‘Parliament Approves Introduction of Temporary 1.5% War Tax from Wages’ (Interfax Ukraine, 31 July 2014), https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/economic/216317.html.Google Scholar
Park, Ian David, The Right to Life in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays, ‘Air War and the Law of War’ (1990) 32 Air Force Law Review 1–225.Google Scholar
Parlett, Kate, ‘The Application of the Rules on Countermeasures in Investment Claims: Visions and Realities of International Law as an Open System’, in Chinkin, Christine and Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 389–405.Google Scholar
Partington, Richard, ‘Russia Plans to Seize Assets of Western Companies That Pull Out’ (The Guardian, 10 March 2022), www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/10/russia-plans-to-seize-assets-of-western-companies-exiting-country.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration Without Privity’ (1995) 10 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 232–57.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Bears the Burden?’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227–58.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Defenses and the Burden of Proof in International Law’, in Paddeu, Federica and Bartels, Lorand (eds.), Exceptions and Defences in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 88–107.Google Scholar
Pearlstein, Deborah, ‘Armed Conflict at the Threshold?’ (2019) 58 Virginia Journal of International Law 369–402.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J., Making and Bending International Rules: The Design of Exceptions and Escape Clauses in Trade Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Pérez-Aznar, Facundo, ‘Investment Protection in Exceptional Situations: Compensation-for-Losses Clauses in IIAs’ (2017) 32 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 696–720.Google Scholar
Pérez-Aznar, Facundo, ‘The Use of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses to Import Substantive Treaty Provisions in International Investment Agreements’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 777–805.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Endeavour’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 533–52.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 671–704.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Conclusion: Reparation for Victims of Armed Conflict – At the Interface of International and National Law’, in Correa, Cristián, Furuya, Shuichi, and Sandoval, Clara (eds.), Reparation for Victims of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 265–84.Google Scholar
Peterson, Luke Eric, ‘Tribunal Finds That BIT’s War-Losses Clause Does Not Exclude Operation of Other BIT Protections (Including Full Protection & Security), but Foreign Investor Fails to Meet Evidentiary Burdens’ (Investment Arbitration Reporter, 8 January 2019), www.iareporter.com/articles/tribunal-finds-that-bits-war-losses-clause-does-not-exclude-operation-of-other-bit-protections-including-full-protection-security-but-foreign-investor-fails-to-meet-evidentiary-burdens/.Google Scholar
Peterson, Luke Eric and Gallus, Nick, ‘International Investment Treaty Protection of Not-for-Profit Organizations’ (2007) 10 International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law 47–76.Google Scholar
Phillimore, Robert, Commentaries Upon International Law (T. & J.W. Johnson & Co., 1857), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Picherack, J. Roman, ‘The Expanding Scope of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Have Recent Tribunals Gone Too Far?’ (2008) 9 Journal of World Investment & Trade 255–91.Google Scholar
Jean, Pictet (ed.), The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949: Commentary (International Committee of the Red Cross, 1958), vol. 4.Google Scholar
Piczak, C. Todd, ‘The Helms–Burton Act: US Foreign Policy Toward Cuba, the National Security Exception to the GATT and the Political Question Doctrine’ (1999) 61 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 287–328.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude and Pictet, Jean, ‘Article 48 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 597–600.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude and Pictet, Jean, ‘Article 49 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 601–8.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude and Pictet, Jean, ‘Article 52 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 629–38.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude and Pictet, Jean, ‘Article 57 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 677–89.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude and Pictet, Jean, ‘Article 58 AP I’, in Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 691–95.Google Scholar
Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona ‘Characterizing War in a Trade Context’ (Opinio Juris, 10 March 2022), http://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/10/characterizing-war-in-a-trade-context/Google Scholar
Pinzauti, Giulia, ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Incidental Application of International Criminal Law and Humanitarian Law: A Critical Discussion of Kononov v. Latvia’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1043–60.Google Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, Riccardo, ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German Yearbook of International Law 9–51.Google Scholar
Pohl, Joachim, ‘Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions’ (2013), OECD Working Paper on International Investment 2013/04, dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en.Google Scholar
Polacheck, Solomon W., Seiglie, Carlos, and Xiang, Jun, ‘Globalization and International Conflict: Can Foreign Direct Investment Increase Cooperation Among Nations?’, in Garfinkel, Michelle R. and Skaperdas, Stergios (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace and Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 733–62.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, Michael and Rosenberg, Charles B., ‘The Adverse Inference in ICSID Practice’ (2015) 30 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 741–51.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, Michael and Volkmer, Sven, ‘The Legality Requirement in Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 34 Journal of International Arbitration 149–68.Google Scholar
Post, H.H.G., ‘Some Curiosities in the Sources of the Law of Armed Conflict Conceived in a General International Legal Perspective’ (1994) 25 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 83–117.Google Scholar
Potesta, Michele, ‘Mapping Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: How Far Have We Gone?’, in Treves, Tullio, Seatzu, Francesco, and Trevisanut, Seline (eds.), Foreign Investment, International Law and Common Concerns (Routledge, 2014), pp. 194–212.Google Scholar
Prescott, Michael K., ‘How War Affects Treaties Between Belligerents: A Case Study of the Gulf War’ (1993) 7 Emory International Law Review 197–231.Google Scholar
Price, , David, ‘Indonesia’s Bold Strategy on Bilateral Investment Treaties: Seeking an Equitable Climate for Investment?’ (2017) 7 Asian Journal of International Law 124–51.Google Scholar
Prieto, Muñoz, Gustavo, Jose, ‘Awarding Damages in Times of Armed Conflict: An Emerging Standard of “Economic Capacity” for the Host State’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 363–83.Google Scholar
Privratsky, Kenneth L., Logistics in the Falklands War (Pen and Sword, 2014).Google Scholar
Pronto, Arnold, ‘The Effect of War on Law: What Happens to Their Treaties When States Go to War?’ (2013) 2 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 227–41.Google Scholar
Provost, Claire and Kennard, Matt, ‘The Obscure Legal System That Lets Corporations Sue Countries’ (The Guardian, 10 June 2015), www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jun/10/obscure-legal-system-lets-corportations-sue-states-ttip-icsid.Google Scholar
Provost, René, ‘Article 73 VCLT’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011), vol. 2, pp. 1645–59.Google Scholar
Prud’homme, Nancie, ‘Lex Specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship?’ (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 356–95.Google Scholar
Puig, Sergio, ‘The Merging of International Trade and Investment Law’ (2015) 33 Berkeley Journal of International Law 1–59.Google Scholar
Pulkowski, Dirk, The Law and Practice of International Regime Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Quéguiner, Jean-François, ‘Precautions under the Law Governing the Conduct of Hostilities’ (2006) 88 International Review of the Red Cross 793–821.Google Scholar
Radjai, Noradèle, Halonen, Laura, and Kyriakou, Panagiotis A., ‘An Analysis of the Compensation Regime Applicable to Claims Arising from Armed Conflicts Affecting Investments in MENA’ (2016) 3 BCDR International Arbitration Review 219–42.Google Scholar
Rajput, Aniruddha, Regulatory Freedom and Indirect Expropriation in Investment Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2018).Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash, ‘Using the Public Law Concept of Proportionality to Balance Investment Protection with Regulation in International Investment Law: A Critical Reappraisal’ (2014) 3 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 853–83.Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash, ‘Protecting Security Interests in International Investment Law’, in Schmidt, Julia, White, Nigel D., and Davies-Bright, Lydia (eds.), Security and International Law (Hart, 2016), pp. 273–300.Google Scholar
Rank, Richard, ‘Modern War and the Validity of Treaties (Part 1)’ (1953) 38 Cornell Law Review 321–55.Google Scholar
Rank, Richard, ‘Modern War and the Validity of Treaties (Part 2)’ (1953) 38 Cornell Law Review 511–40.Google Scholar
Reed, Lucy, Scanion, Zoe, and Atanasova, Dafina, ‘Protected Investment’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2018), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H., ‘The Meaning of “Necessary” in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XIV: The Myth of Cost-Benefit Balancing’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 347–69.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘Necessity in International Investment Arbitration: An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases? Comments on CMS v. Argentina and LG&E v. Argentina’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment & Trade 191–214.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘Expropriation’, in Muchlinski, Peter T., Ortino, Federico, and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 407–57.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘Legality of Expropriations’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, ‘The Interpretation of International Investment Agreements’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 372–410.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August and Schreuer, Christoph, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Repousis, Odysseas G. and Fry, James, ‘Armed Conflict and State Succession in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2016) 22 Columbia Journal of European Law 421–49.Google Scholar
Reuter, Christoph, ‘The Struggle for Normality Amid the Ruins of War’ (Der Spiegel, 26 February 2013), www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-struggle-to-maintain-order-in-rebel-controlled-aleppo-in-syria-a-885396.html.Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul, Introduction to the Law of Treaties (first published 1995, Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert, ‘British Industry and the First World War’, in Liddle, Peter (ed.), Britain and Victory in the Great War (Pen and Sword, 2018), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Ripinsky, Sergey and Williams, Kevin, Damages in International Investment Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008).Google Scholar
Robert-Cuendet, Sabrina, ‘Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions and International Investment Law’, in Beaucillon, Charlotte (ed.), Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions (Edward Elgar, 2021), pp. 204–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Triangular Treaties: The Extent and Limits of Investment Treaty Rights’ (2015) 56 Harvard International Law Journal 353–417.Google Scholar
Robinson, Isabel and Nohle, Ellen, ‘Proportionality and Precautions in Attack: The Reverberating Effects of Using Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas’ (2016) 98 International Review of the Red Cross 107–45.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel, ‘Non-State Actors and Human Rights’, in Sheeran, Scott and Rodley, Nigel (eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Routledge, 2013), pp. 523–44.Google Scholar
Ronen, Yaël, ‘Treaties and Armed Conflict’, in Tams, Christian J., Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar, 2014), pp. 541–64.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 American Journal of International Law 517–28.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Billa, Benjamin, ‘Treaties and National Security’ (2008) 40 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 437–96.Google Scholar
Rosenau, William and others, ‘Corporations and Counterinsurgency’ (2009), RAND Corporation, Occasional Paper, www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP259.html.Google Scholar
Rosentreter, Daniel, Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Nomos, 2015).Google Scholar
Rubin, Seymour J., ‘“Inviolability” of Enemy Private Property’ (1945) 11 Law and Contemporary Problems 166–82.Google Scholar
Ruzza, Alice, ‘Expropriation and Nationalization’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2017), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Ryk-Lakhman, Ira, ‘Foreign Investments as Non-Human Targets’, in Baade, Björnstjern, Mührel, Linus, and Petrov, Anton O. (eds.), International Humanitarian Law in Areas of Limited Statehood: Adaptable and Legitimate or Rigid and Unreasonable? (Nomos, 2018), pp. 171–93.Google Scholar
Ryk-Lakhman, Ira, ‘Protection of Foreign Investments Against the Effects of Hostilities: A Framework for Assessing Compliance with Full Protection and Security’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 259–82.Google Scholar
Ryk-Lakhman, Ira, ‘The Protection of Foreign Investments in Armed Conflicts’, PhD thesis, University College London (2019).Google Scholar
Ryk-Lakhman, Ira, ‘The Genealogy of Extended War Clauses: Requisition and Destruction of Property in Armed Conflicts’, in Ackermann, Tobias and Wuschka, Sebastian (eds.), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 54–83.Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu, Duggal, Kabir, and Birch, Nicholas, ‘Limits on Compensation for Internationally Wrongful Acts’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 1115–29.Google Scholar
Sabanogullari, Levent, General Exception Clauses in International Investment Law: The Recalibration of Investment Agreements via WTO-Based Flexibilities (Nomos, 2018).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘The Admission and Treatment of Foreign Investment under Recent Bilateral and Regional Treaties’ (2000) 1 Journal of World Investment 105–26.Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, , Giorgio, ‘The Application of BITs in Time of Economic Crisis: Limits to Their Coverage, Necessity and the Relevance of WTO Law’, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio and others (eds.), General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Sadat-Akhavi, Seyed Ali, Methods of Resolving Conflicts between Treaties (Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘The Emerging Global Regime for Investment’ (2010) 51 Harvard International Law Journal 427–73.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Salomon, Tim Rene, ‘Zum Verhältnis von Menschenrechten und Humanitärem Völkerrecht: Normative und methodische Grundlagen’ (2015) 28 Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict 153–62.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, ‘Treaty, Custom and the Cross-Fertilization of International Law’ (1998) 1 Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 85–106.Google Scholar
Santerre, Elyce K.D., ‘From Confiscation to Contingency Contracting: Property Acquisition on or Near the Battlefield’ (1989) 124 Military Law Review 111–61.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘State Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ (2002) 84 International Review of the Red Cross 401–34.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘The Convergence of the International Humanitarian Law of Non-International and International Armed Conflicts: The Dark Side of a Good Idea’, in Biaggini, Giovanni, Diggelmann, Oliver, and Kaufmann, Christine (eds.), Polis und Kosmopolis: Festschrift für Daniel Thürer (Nomos, 2015), pp. 679–89.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare (Edward Elgar, 2019).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine A., and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law (3rd ed., International Committee of the Red Cross, 2011), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco and Olson, Laura M., ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Where It Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (2008) 90 International Review of the Red Cross 599–627.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Compensation for Expropriation’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law 121–30.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar
Schemo, Diana Jean, ‘Oil Companies Buying an Army to Ward Off Rebels in Colombia’ (The New York Times, 22 August 1996), www.nytimes.com/1996/08/22/world/oil-companies-buying-an-army-to-ward-off-rebels-in-colombia.html.Google Scholar
Scheu, Julian, Systematische Berücksichtigung von Menschenrechten in Investitionsschiedsverfahren (Nomos, 2017).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Der völkerrechtliche Staatsnotstand in der Entscheidung des BVerfG zu Argentinischen Staatsanleihen – Anachronismus oder Avantgarde?’ (2008) 68 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 45–67.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’, in Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 151–82.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’ (2011) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 57–102.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘W(h)ither Fragmentation? On the Literature and Sociology of International Investment Law’ (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 875–908.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Ordering Paradigms in International Investment Law: Bilateralism – Multilateralism – Multilateralization’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 109–41.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., Tams, Christian J., and Hofmann, Rainer, ‘International Investment Law and History: An Introduction’, in Schill, Stephan W., Tams, Christian J., and Hofmann, Rainer (eds.), International Investment Law and History (Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. and Briese, Robyn, ‘“If the State Considers”: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement’ (2009) 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 61–140.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. and Djanic, Vladislav, ‘Wherefore Art Thou? Towards a Public Interest-Based Justification of International Investment Law’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 29–55.Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, ‘The International Committee of the Red Cross and Human Rights’ (1979) 19 International Review of the Red Cross 3–14.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Humanitarian Law and Direct Participation in Hostilities by Private Contractors or Civilian Employees’ (2005) 5 Chicago Journal of International Law 511–46.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Military Necessity and Humanity in International Humanitarian Law: Preserving the Delicate Balance’ (2010) 50 Virginia Journal of International Law 795–839.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Discriminate Warfare’, in Lovell, Dawid W. and Primoratz, Igor (eds.), Protecting Civilians During Violent Conflict: Theoretical and Practical Issues for the 21st Century (Ashgate, 2012), pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Targeting in Operational Law’, in Gill, Terry D. and Fleck, Dieter (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 269–306.Google Scholar
Schreier, Fred and Caparini, Marina, ‘Privatising Security: Law, Practice and Governance of Private Military and Security Companies’(2005) Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) Occasional Paper No. 6, www.dcaf.ch/privatising-security.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Derogation of Human Rights in Situations of Public Emergency: The Experience of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1982) 9 Yale Journal of World Public Order 113–32.Google Scholar
Schreuer, , Christoph, , The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi, and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years on (Nijhoff, 2010), pp. 129–51.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Investments, International Protection’, in Peters, Anne (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (2013), https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/MPIL.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘The Protection of Investments in Armed Conflicts’, in Baetens, Freya (ed.), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 1 McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 1–25.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘War and Peace in International Investment Law’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Schwager, Elke, ‘The Right to Compensation for Victims of an Armed Conflict’ (2005) 4 Chinese Journal of International Law 417–39.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, ‘Jus Pacis Ac Belli? Prolegomena to a Sociology of International Law’ (1943) 37 American Journal of International Law 460–79.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg, International Law: as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens & Sons, 1968), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘Introduction’, in Franke, Ulf, Magnusson, Annette, and Dahlquist, Joel (eds.), Arbitrating for Peace: How Arbitration Made a Difference (Kluwer Law International, 2016), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Searby, James, ‘Measuring Country Risk in International Arbitration’, in Beharry, Christina L. (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill, 2018), pp. 231–61.Google Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, Anja, ‘Die völkerrechtliche Verantwortung des Staats für das Handeln von Privaten: Bedarf nach Neuorientierung?’ (2013) 73 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 37–60.Google Scholar
Seršić, Maja, ‘Due Diligence: Fault-Based Responsibility or Autonomous Standard?’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Seršić, Maja, and Šošić, Trpimir M. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Brill Nijhoff, 2016), pp. 151–70.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (8th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N. and Fournet, Caroline, ‘Article 62 VCLT’, in Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011), vol. 2, pp. 1411–33.Google Scholar
Shelton, , Dinah, and Gould, Ariel, ‘Positive and Negative Obligations’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 562–83.Google Scholar
Shterngel, Max, ‘Bucking Conventional Wisdom: Russia’s Unilateral “Suspension” of the CFE Treaty’ (2008) 33 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1037–68.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights?’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 573–96.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Kill, Theodore, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps Towards a Methodology’, in Binder, Christina and others (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 678–707.Google Scholar
Simon, Hendrik, ‘The Myth of Liberum Ius ad Bellum: Justifying War in 19th-Century Legal Theory and Political Practice’ (2018) 29 European Journal of International Law 113–36.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Anthony, ‘Umbrella Clause’, in Bungenberg, Marc and others (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos, 2015), pp. 887–958.Google Scholar
Singh, Kavaljit and Ilge, Burghard, ‘India Overhauls Its Investment Treaty Regime’ (Financial Times, 15 July 2016), www.ft.com/content/53bd355c-8203-34af-9c27-7bf990a447dc.Google Scholar
Sinha, Amit Kumar, ‘Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties of South Asian Countries’ (2017) 7 Asian Journal of International Law 227–63.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Re-Envisaging the International Law of Internal Armed Conflict’ (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 219–64.Google Scholar
Slim, Hugo, ‘Business Actors in Armed Conflict: Towards a New Humanitarian Agenda’ (2012) 94 International Review of the Red Cross 903–18.Google Scholar
Solf, Waldemar A., ‘Article 52 AP I’, in Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef, and Solf, Waldemar A. (eds.), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (2nd ed., Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 360–69.Google Scholar
Solf, Waldemar A., ‘Article 58 AP I’, in Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef, and Solf, Waldemar A. (eds.), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (2nd ed., Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 412–17.Google Scholar
Solf, Waldemar A., ‘Introduction: General Protection against Effects of Hostilities’, in Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef, and Solf, Waldemar A. (eds.), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (2nd ed., Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 315–20.Google Scholar
Solis, Gary D., The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Sommerich, Otto C., ‘A Brief against Confiscation’ (1945) 11 Law and Contemporary Problems 152–65.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Spears, Suzanne, ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037–75.Google Scholar
Spears, Suzanne and Fogdestam Agius, Maria, ‘Protection of Investments in War-Torn States: A Practitioner’s Perspective on War Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 283–317.Google Scholar
Špokauskas, Dovydas, ‘Suspension of the Operation of an International Treaty: Analysis of the Decision by the Russian Federation to Suspend the Implementation of Its Obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe’ (2010) 10 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 29–48.Google Scholar
Sprankling, John G., The International Law of Property (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Stahn, Carsten, ‘“Jus ad bellum”, “jus in bello” … “jus post bellum”? Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force’ (2007) 17 European Journal of International Law 921–43.Google Scholar
Steiger, Dominik, ‘Enforcing International Humanitarian Law through Human Rights Bodies’, in Krieger, Heike (ed.), Inducing Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Lessons from the African Great Lakes Region (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 263–99.Google Scholar
Subedi, Surya P. (ed.), Unilateral Sanctions in International Law (2021).Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Economic “Necessity” in International Law’ (2015) 109 American Journal of International Law 296–323.Google Scholar
Szalai, Anikó, ‘Hungarian Experiences Regarding the Effect of World Wars on International Treaties’ (2007–8) 3 Acta Societatis Martensis 215–26.Google Scholar
Tabak, Shana, ‘Ambivalent Enforcement: International Humanitarian Law at Human Rights Tribunals’ (2016) 37 Michigan Journal of International Law 661–715.Google Scholar
Tan Zhi Peng, Benny, ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on the Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties: Evaluating the Applicability of Impossibility of Performance and Fundamental Change’ (2013) 3 Asian Journal of International Law 51–76.Google Scholar
Tarasofsky, Richard G., ‘Legal Protection of the Environment during International Armed Conflict’ (1993) 24 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 17–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alan, ‘DIY Weapons of the Syrian Rebels’ (The Atlantic, 20 February 2013), www.theatlantic.com/photo/2013/02/diy-weapons-of-the-syrian-rebels/100461/.Google Scholar
Taylor, Derek, Don Pacifico: The Acceptable Face of Gunboat Diplomacy (Vallentine Mitchell, 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, Mark B., War Economies and International Law: Regulating the Economic Activities of Violent Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Teferra, Zelalem Mogessie, ‘National Security and the Right to Liberty in Armed Conflict: The Legality and Limits of Security Detention in International Humanitarian Law’ (2016) 98 International Review of the Red Cross 961–93.Google Scholar
Thielbörger, Pierre and Ackermann, Tobias, ‘A Treaty on Enforcing Human Rights Against Business: Closing the Loophole or Getting Stuck in a Loop?’ (2017) 24 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 43–79.Google Scholar
Titi, Catharine, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Nomos, 2014).Google Scholar
Titi, Catharine, ‘Police Powers Doctrine and International Investment Law’, in Gattini, Andrea, Tanzi, Attila, and Fontanelli, Filippo (eds.), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill, 2018), pp. 323–43.Google Scholar
Todeschini, Vito, ‘The ICCPR in Armed Conflict: An Appraisal of the Human Rights Committee’s Engagement with International Humanitarian Law’ (2017) 35 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 203–19.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Are Counter-Measures Subject to Prior Recourse to Dispute Settlement Procedures?’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 77–88.Google Scholar
Tonkin, Hannah, State Control over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Trapp, Kimberley N., State Responsibility for International Terrorism: Problems and Prospects (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tropper, Johannes, ‘Russia’s Plans for “Nationalizing” Foreign-Owned Companies: Here Come the Investment Disputes’ (Völkerrechtsblog, 29 March 2022), http://voelkerrechtsblog.org/de/russias-plans-for-nationalizing-foreign-owned-companies/;Google Scholar
Triska, Jan Francis and Slusser, Robert Melville, The Theory, Law and Policy of Soviet Treaties (Stanford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Tucker, Todd, ‘The WTO Just Blew up Trump’s Argument for Steel Tariffs’ (The Washington Post, 5 April 2019), www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/05/wto-just-blew-up-trumps-argument-steel-tariffs/.Google Scholar
Turns, David, ‘Military Objectives’, in Liivoja, Rain and McCormack, Tim (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Law of Armed Conflict (Routledge, 2016), pp. 139–56.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers, The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of War (2nd ed., Clarendon Press, 1875), vol. 2.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Arbitration Rules (with New Article 1, Paragraph 4, as Adopted in 2013) (United Nations, 2014)Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Taking of Property (United Nations, 2000).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investor-State Disputes Arising from Investment Treaties: A Review (United Nations, 2005).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995–2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking (United Nations, 2007).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, The Protection of National Security in IIAs (United Nations, 2009).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Expropriation: A Sequel (United Nations, 2012).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Special Update on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Facts and Figures’ (2017), IIA Issues Note 3, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaepcb2017d7_en.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report 2019: Special Economic Zones (United Nations, 2019).Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘International Investment Agreements Navigator’ (2021), https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group, ‘Third Revised Draft Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (17 August 2021), www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGTransCorp/Session6/LBI3rdDRAFT.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations, Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Handbook (United Nations, 2003).Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina, Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Van Aaken, Anne, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Law’ (2006) 17 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 91–130.Google Scholar
Van Aaken, Anne, ‘International Investment Law between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis’ (2009) 12 Journal of International Economic Law 507–38.Google Scholar
Van Aaken, Anne, ‘Control Mechanisms in International Investment Law’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 409–35.Google Scholar
Van Aaken, Anne, ‘International Investment Law and Decentralized Targeted Sanctions: An Uneasy Relationship’ (2016), Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 164, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2013/10/No-164-van-Aaken-FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Boyd, ‘Human Rights in War: On the Entangled Foundations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law 553–82.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, The Trouble with Foreign Investor Protection (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., U.S. International Investment Agreements (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 43–106.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘Rebalancing through Exceptions’ (2013) 17 Lewis & Clark Law Review 449–59.Google Scholar
Vandewalle, Dirk, A History of Modern Libya (2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Vasciannie, Stephen C., ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties and Civil Strife: The AAPL / Sri Lanka Arbitration’ (1992) 39 Netherlands International Law Review 332–54.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de, The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (J. Coote, 1759), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Veith, Werner and Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, Der Schutz von ausländischem Vermögen im Völkerrecht (Verlag August Lutzeyer, 1962).Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred and Simma, Bruno, Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis (3rd ed., Duncker & Humblot, 2010).Google Scholar
Verzijl, H. W., International Law in Historical Perspective (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978), vol. 9-A.Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E., ‘Sovereignty in Foreign Investment Law’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 317–62.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E., ‘Defence Arguments in Investment Arbitration’ (2020) 18 ICSID Reports 9–108.Google Scholar
Vité, Sylvain, ‘Typology of Armed Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law: Legal Concepts and Actual Situations’ (2009) 91 International Review of the Red Cross 69–94.Google Scholar
Vladeck, Stephen I., ‘Enemy Aliens, Enemy Property, and Access to the Courts’ (2007) 11 Lewis & Clark Law Review 963–96.Google Scholar
Vohryzek, Ana, ‘Unjust Enrichment Unjustly Ignored: Opportunities and Pitfalls in Bringing Unjust Enrichment Claims under ICSID’ (2009) 31 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 501–80.Google Scholar
Von Clausewitz, Carl, On War (first published 1832, Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Von der Decken, Kerstin, ‘Article 42’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 791–804.Google Scholar
Von der Decken, Kerstin, ‘Article 44’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed., Springer, 2018), pp. 813–23.Google Scholar
Von Mehren, Robert B. and Kourides, P. Nicholas, ‘International Arbitrations between States and Foreign Private Parties: The Libyan Nationalization Cases’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 437–552.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania, ‘The Security Exception In WTO Law: Entering a New Era’ (2019) 113 American Journal of International Law Unbound 45–50.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania and Mitchell, Andrew D., ‘Denunciation, Termination and Survival: The Interplay of Treaty Law and International Investment Law’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 413–33.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania, Mitchell, Andrew D., and Munro, James, ‘Parting Ways: The Impact of Mutual Termination of Investment Treaties on Investor Rights’ (2014) 29 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 451–73.Google Scholar
Vranes, Erich, ‘The Definition of “Norm Conflict” in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 395–418.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Clemens, ‘The Twilight of the BITs? EU Judicial Proceedings, the Consensual Termination of Intra-EU BITs and Why that Matters for International Law’ (2016), Institute of Economic Law Transnational Economic Law Research Center (TELC), Beiträge zum transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht No. 140, http://digital.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/pe/urn/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-57165.Google Scholar
Michael, Waibel and others (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, ‘International Investment Law and Treaty Interpretation’, in Hofmann, Rainer and Tams, Christian J. (eds.), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Nomos, 2011), pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W. and Sabahi, Borzu, ‘Compensation, Damages, and Valuation’, in Muchlinski, Peter T., Ortino, Federico, and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1049–1124.Google Scholar
Wallace, Stuart, The Application of the European Convention on Human Rights to Military Operations (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Waxman, Matthew C., ‘Detention as Targeting: Standards of Certainty and Detention of Suspected Terrorists’ (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review 1365–1430.Google Scholar
Webber, George J., The Effect of War on Contracts (2nd ed., The Solicitors’ Law Stationery Society, 1946).Google Scholar
Weeramantry, J Romesh, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Well, Sharon, The Role of National Courts in Applying International Humanitarian Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Wells Sheffer, Megan, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Friend or Foe to Human Rights?’ (2020) 39 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 483–521.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Henry, Elements of International Law: With a Sketch of the History of the Science (Carey, Lea & Blanchard, 1836).Google Scholar
White, Sarah, ‘Court Blocks Lafarge Bid to Scrap Syria Crime Against Humanity Charge’ (Reuters, 7 September 2021), www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/court-blocks-lafarge-bid-scrap-syria-crime-against-humanity-charge-2021-09-07/.Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard Sutherland, ‘The Politics of Procedure: An Examination of the GATT Dispute Settlement Panel and the Article XXI Defense in the Context of the US Embargo of Nicaragua’ (1987) 19 Law and Policy in International Business 603–31.Google Scholar
World Bank Group, The Toll of War: The Economic and Social Consequences of the Conflict in Syria (The World Bank,2017).Google Scholar
World Bank Group, ‘World Bank Open Data’ (2022), https://data.worldbank.org/.Google Scholar
Wortley, B.A., Expropriation in Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Wright, Jason D., ‘“Excessive” Ambiguity: Analysing and Refining the Proportionality Standard’ (2012) 94 International Review of the Red Cross 819–54.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, ‘The Outlawry of War and the Law of War’ (1953) 47 American Journal of International Law 365–76.Google Scholar
Wu, Mark, ‘The Scope and Limits of Trade’s Influence in Shaping the Evolving International Investment Regime’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost, and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 169–209.Google Scholar
Wuschka, Sebastian, ‘Procedural Aspects of the Obligation of Non-Recognition Before International Investment Tribunals’, in Gómez, Katia Fach, Gourgourinis, Anastasios, and Titi, Catharine (eds.), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer, 2019), pp. 129–51.Google Scholar
Yacoub, Amin R., ‘The Case of Ampal v Egypt: What are the Parameters of the Due Diligence Standard?’ (Cambridge International Law Journal Blog, 16 November 2018), http://cilj.co.uk/2018/11/16/the-case-of-ampal-v-egypt-what-are-the-parameters-of-the-due-diligence-standard/.Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 111–30.Google Scholar
Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Zadorozhnii, Oleksandr, International Law in the Relations of Ukraine and the Russian Federation (K.I.S., 2016).Google Scholar
Zamir, Noam, ‘The Police Powers Doctrine in International Investment Law’ (2017) 14 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 318–37.Google Scholar
Zannoni, Diego, ‘The Legitimate Expectation of Regulatory Stability under the Energy Charter Treaty’ (2020) 33 Leiden Journal of International Law 451–66.Google Scholar
Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth, ‘Full Protection and Security’, in Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 183–212.Google Scholar
Zhu, Ying, ‘Do Clarified Indirect Expropriation Clauses in International Investment Treaties Preserve Environmental Regulatory Space?’ (2019) 60 Harvard International Law Journal 377–416.Google Scholar
Zrilič, Jure, ‘International Investment Law in the Context of Jus Post Bellum: Are Investment Treaties Likely to Facilitate or Hinder the Transition to Peace?’ (2015) 16 Journal of World Investment & Trade 604–32.Google Scholar
Zrilič, Jure, ‘Armed Conflict as Force Majeure in International Investment Law’ (2019) 16 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 28–56.Google Scholar
Zrilič, Jure, The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Zrilič, Jure, ‘Investor Obligations Amid Armed Conflict’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Hart, 2021), pp. 235–61.Google Scholar
Zrilič, Jure, ‘Are We in for a New Wave of Investment Arbitrations? Russia’s Measures Against Foreign Investors and Investment Treaty Implications’ (Verfassungsblog, 21 March 2022), https://verfassungsblog.de/are-we-in-for-a-new-wave-of-investment-arbitrations/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Tobias Ackermann, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
  • Book: The Effects of Armed Conflict on Investment Treaties
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207805.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Tobias Ackermann, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
  • Book: The Effects of Armed Conflict on Investment Treaties
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207805.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Tobias Ackermann, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
  • Book: The Effects of Armed Conflict on Investment Treaties
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207805.014
Available formats
×