Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- 18 Seed dispersal by mouse lemurs: do Microcebus represent a unique frugivorous guild?
- 19 Predation in the dark: antipredator strategies of Cheirogaleidae and other nocturnal primates
- 20 The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus): a novel cognitive primate brain aging model
- 21 Acoustic divergence in communication of cheirogaleids with special emphasis to mouse lemurs
- 22 Modeling the origins of primate sociality: social fl exibility and kinship in mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.)
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- Index
- Plate section
- References
22 - Modeling the origins of primate sociality: social fl exibility and kinship in mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.)
from Part IV - Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- 18 Seed dispersal by mouse lemurs: do Microcebus represent a unique frugivorous guild?
- 19 Predation in the dark: antipredator strategies of Cheirogaleidae and other nocturnal primates
- 20 The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus): a novel cognitive primate brain aging model
- 21 Acoustic divergence in communication of cheirogaleids with special emphasis to mouse lemurs
- 22 Modeling the origins of primate sociality: social fl exibility and kinship in mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.)
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
The dawn of primate social complexity: kin selection in asocial mammals
Since Hamilton's ground-breaking theory of inclusive fitness in 1964, kin-biased behavior has been theorized to have played a crucial role in the evolution of mammalian sociality (Hamilton, 1964; de Waal and Tyack, 2003; Chapais and Berman, 2004). Given the amount of attention given to the topic over the subsequent decades, it is surprising that while group-living and social complexity has evolved multiple times in mammals, we still know very little about how this process occurs (Waser and Jones, 1983; Müller and Thalmann, 2000; de Waal and Tyack, 2003). In this section we review what is known about ancestral mammals and how they were the foundation for the evolution of ancestral primates.
Ancestral mammals are believed to have been asocial, as are many extant mammal species (Waser and Jones, 1983; Müller and Thalmann, 2000). Asocial species forage alone and maintain no relationships outside of the mating and infant-rearing seasons (Charles-Dominique, 1974, 1978; Waser and Jones, 1983; Müller and Thalmann, 2000). Interactions between adults, including adult kin, are marked by avoidance and aggression (Charles-Dominique, 1974; Waser and Jones, 1983; Müller and Thalmann, 2000). This is note-worthy because in many species, females typically disperse shorter distances than males, leading to a spatial clustering of female kin (Waser and Jones, 1983; Stoen et al., 2005; Maher, 2009). For many scientists, it is this spatial clustering of kin which is the first step towards increasing sociality (Waser and Jones, 1983; Perrin and Lehmann, 2001; Kappeler et al., 2002; Lutermann et al., 2006; Meshriy et al., 2011; Messier et al., 2012). The transition to group-living is believed to have occurred through solitary foraging (Müller and Thalmann, 2000). Extant solitary foragers forage alone, but, in contrast to the asocial mammalian ancestors, maintain year-round social networks, communicating with conspecifics via scent-marks and vocalizations (Charles-Dominique, 1974, 1978; Zimmermann, 1990, 1995a, 1995b, 2010; Müller and Thalmann, 2000; Nash, 2004; see also Chapter 21). Individuals may interact affiliatively during their active periods and sometimes sleep in social groups, often consisting of matrilineal kin, during the inactive periods (e.g., Radespiel et al., 2001b; Eberle and Kappeler 2006; for review, see Müller and Thalmann, 2000).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of MadagascarBiology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae, pp. 422 - 446Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
- 5
- Cited by