Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:40:59.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Philosophical Perspectives on Divination, Revelation, and Prophecy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Elsa Giovanna Simonetti
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Claire Hall
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Berchman, Robert M. 1988a. ‘Arcana Mundi: Prophecy and Divination in De Vita Mosis of Philo of Alexandria’. Society of Biblical Literature 27: 385423.Google Scholar
Berchman, Robert M. 1988b. ‘Arcana Mundi between Balaam and Hecate: Prophecy, Divination, and Magic in Later Platonism’. Society of Biblical Literature 28: 107–85.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. 2017. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Helmut. 1988. Die Inspiration heiliger Schriften bei Philo von Alexandrien. Basel: Brunnen Verlag.Google Scholar
Calabi, Francesca. 2000. ‘Galeno e Mosè’. Ricerche Storico Filosofiche 55: 535–46.Google Scholar
Calabi, Francesca. 2008. ‘Dio e l’ordine del mondo in Filone di Alessandria’. Études Platoniciennes 5: 2339.Google Scholar
Calabi, Francesca. 2014.‘Lettera e allegoria in Filone di Alessandria’. In Loredana, R. and Iozzia, Daniele (eds.), ΚΑΛΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΕΤΗ: Bellezza e virtù: Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti. Acireale-Rome: Bonanno. pp. 277–84.Google Scholar
Cepolid, Maria Grazia. 1985. ‘Giudaismo ed ellenismo: Il kairos della salvezza in Filone di Alessandria’. Archivio di filosofia 53: 209–19.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. 1967. ‘Philo and the Beginning of Christian Thought’. In Armstrong, Arthur H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–92.Google Scholar
Colson, Francis H. and Whitaker, George H.. 1929–1962. Philo: Twelve Volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Daniélou, Jean. 1958. Philon d’Alexandrie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. 1996. The Middle-Platonists: A Study of Platonism: 80 BC to AD 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lampe, Geoffrey H. 1977. God as Spirit: The Bampton Lectures 1976. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Levison, John R. 1995a. ‘The Prophetic Spirit as an Angel According to Philo’. The Harvard Theological Review 88: 189207.Google Scholar
Levison, John R. 1995b. ‘Inspiration and the Divine Spirit in the Writings of Philo Judaeus’. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period 26: 271323.Google Scholar
Lévy, Carlos. 1997. ‘De Chrysippe à Posidonius: variations stoiciennes sue le thème de la divination’. In Heintz, Jean-Georges (ed.), Oracles et prophéties dans l’antiquité: Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg (15–17 juin 1995). Paris: De Boccard, pp. 321–43.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. 2018. Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. 2009. ‘M. Annius Ammonius, a Philosophical Profile’. In Bonazzi, Mauro and Opsomer, Jan (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 123–86.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Albert and Wright, Benjamin G.. 2007. A New English Translation of the Septuagint: And the Other Greek Translations Traditionally Included Under That Title. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reiling, Jesco. 1971. ‘The Use of ψευδοπροφήτης in the Septuagint, Philo and Josephus’. Novum Testamentum 13: 147–56.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 2000. ‘Philo the Theologian’. In Hart, Trevor A. (ed.), The Dictionary of Historical Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 424–6.Google Scholar
Simonetti, Elsa Giovanna. 2020. ‘Who Is the Best Prophet? The “Manifold” Character of a Quotation in Plutarch’. In Vamvouri-Rouffi, Maria, Hirsch-Luipold, Reiner, and Schmidt, Thomas (eds.), The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden: Brill, pp. 349–61.Google Scholar
Sterling, Gregory E. 2016. ‘When East and West Meet: Eastern Religions and Western Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria and Plutarch of Chaeronea’. Studia Philonica 28: 137–50.Google Scholar
Thackeray, Henry St. John. 1930. Josephus: Jewish Antiquities, Vol. 1: Books 1–3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
von Arnim, Johannes. 1903–1924. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Winston, David. 1989. ‘Two Types of Mosaic Prophecy According to Philo’. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 4: 4967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, Charles D. 1993. The Works of Philo, Complete and Unabridged. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Adler, Ada (ed.). (1935). Suidae Lexicon, vol. IV. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Augustinianum 29 = 1989. Sogni, visioni e profezie nell’Antico Cristianesimo, XVII Incontro di studiosi dell’Antichità Cristiana. Rome, 57 May 1987 [Conference proceedings.]Google Scholar
Aune, David E. 1983. Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Aussedat, Mathilde and Cassin, Matthieu. 2010. “Le prologue du Commentaire sur les petits prophètes de Théophylacte d’Achrida.Revue des études byzantines 68: 6193.Google Scholar
Bach, Valérie. 2007. Les clefs des songes médiévales (XIIIe–XVe siècles). Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 2018. “Statut et fonction de la prophétie. Exégèse de 2 Pierre 1, 19–21 chez les auteurs chrétiens des cinq premiers siècles.” in Arnold, Matthieu, Dahan, Gilbert, and Noblesse-Rocher, Annie (eds.), 2 Pierre 1, 19–21. Inspiration de l’Écriture, liberté de l’exégèse. Paris: Cerf, pp. 43107.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. 2003. “These Christians Who Dream: The Authority of Dreams in the First Centuries of Christianity.” In Bovon, François, Studies in Early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 144–62.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc, Seamus, O’Neill, and Timotin, Andrei (eds.). 2018. Neoplatonic Demons and Angels (Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition 20). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cox Miller, Patricia. 1986. “‘A Dubious Twilight’: Reflections on Dream in Patristic Literature.Church History 55: 153–64.Google Scholar
Dagron, Gilbert. 1985. “Rêver de Dieu et parler de soi. Le rêve et son interprétation d’après les sources byzantines.” In Gregory, Tullio (ed.), I sogni nel medioevo, Seminario internazionale, Roma 2–4 ottobre. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, pp. 3755.Google Scholar
Dautzenberg, Gerhard. 1975. Urchristliche Prophetie: Ihre Erforschung, ihre Voraussetzungen im Judentum und ihre Struktur im ersten Korintherbrief. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
de Boor, C. (ed.). 1904. Georgii monachi chronicon. Leipzig: Teubner (21978, corr. P. Wirth.)Google Scholar
Drexl, Franz. 1926. “Das Traumbuch des Propheten Daniel nach dem cod. Vatic. Palat. gr. 319.Byzantinische Zeitschrift 29: 290314.Google Scholar
Dulaey, Martine. 1973. Le rêve dans la vie et la pensée de Saint Augustin. Paris: Études augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Filoramo, Giovanni. 2007. “Profeti falsi e profeti veri da Plutarco a Celso.” In Cacciatore, Paola Volpe and Ferrari, Franco (eds.), Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X convegno plutarcheo: Fisciano-Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005 (Collectanea, 25). Napoli: D’Auria, pp. 4156.Google Scholar
Fischer, Steven R. 1982. The Complete Medieval Dreambook: A Multilingual, Alphabetical “Somniale Danielis” Collection. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frenschkowski, Marco. 2018. Prophetie: Innovation, Tradition und Subversion in spätantiken Religionen (Standorte in Antike und Christentum 10). Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Guidorizzi, Giulio. 1977. “I prontuari oniromantici bizantini.Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienza morali e storiche 111: 135–55.Google Scholar
Hahn, Johannes. 2003. “Weiser, göttlicher Mensch oder Scharlatan? Das Bild des Apollonius von Tyana bei Heiden und Christen.” In Aland, Barbara, Hahn, Johannes, and Ronning, Christian (eds.), Literarische Konstituierung von Identifikationsfiguren in der Antike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 87109.Google Scholar
Hvidt, Christian. 2007. Christian Prophecy: The Post-Biblical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Christopher P. 2006. “Apollonius of Tyana in Late Antiquity.” In Fitzgerald Johnson, Scott (ed.), Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 4964.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain. 2016. “Sur la doctrine du vrai prophète dans les écrits pseudo-clémentins.” In Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, De Cillis, Maria, De Smet, Daniel, and Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan (eds.), L’ésotérisme shi‘ite, ses racines et ses prolongements. Turnhout: Brepols, pp.139–62.Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques 1985. “Le christianisme et les rêves (IIe–VIIe s.),” in Gregory, Tullio (ed.), I sogni nel medioevo, Seminario internazionale, Roma 2–4 ottobre, 1983. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, pp. 171218.Google Scholar
Magdalino, Paul. 2011. “Orthodoxy and History in Tenth-Century Byzantine ‘Encyclopedism.’” In Van Deun, Peter and Macé, Caroline (eds.), Encyclopedic Trends in Byzantium? Proceedings of the International Conference held in Leuven, 6–8 May 2009. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 143–60.Google Scholar
Magdalino, Paul. 2019. “Prophecy, Divination and the Church in Byzantium.” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 185202.Google Scholar
Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.) 2019. Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or.Google Scholar
Maraval, Pierre. 2017. “Gregory of Nyssa, Lettre sur la pythonisse.” In Lettre canonique. Lettre sur la pythonisse et six homélies pastorales: Introduction, traduction et notes. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Martin, Lawrence T. 1981. Somniale Danielis: An Edition of a Medieval Dream Interpretation Handbook. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mavroudi, Maria. 2002. A Byzantine Book on Dream Interpretation: The Oneirocriticon of Achmet and Its Arabic Sources. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méhat, André. 1987. “Divination païenne et prophétie chrétienne: La Pythie, Origène et Saint Jean Chrysostome.” In Lies, Lothar (ed.), Origeniana Quarta: Die Referate des 4. Internationalen Origeneskongresses (Innsbruck, 2.–6. September 1985). Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag, pp. 436–41.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, Steven M. 1991. The Oneirocriticon of Achmet: A Medieval Greek and Arabic Treatise on the Interpretation of Dreams. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, Steven M. 2008. Dreambooks in Byzantium: Six Oneirocritica in Translation with Commentary and Introduction. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, Steven M. 2009. “Prolegomena to the Reconstruction of the Archetype of the Greek Somniale Danielis,” Quaderni di studi indo-mediterranei [= Sogni e visioni nel mondo indo-mediterraneo, 2: 107–24.Google Scholar
Oberhelman, Steven M. 2019. “How Popular Were the Byzantine Dreambooks? Divination and Byzantine Dreamers.” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 401–33.Google Scholar
Pagels, Eliane H. 1973. “Origen and the Prophets of Israel: a Critique of Christian Typology.The Gaster Festschrift: Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society of Columbia University 5: 335–44.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, Arietta. 2001. Le culte des saints en Égypte des Byzantins aux Abbasides. L’apport des inscriptions et des papyrus grecs et coptes. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
Peleanu, Adina. 2011. “Deux séries chrysostomiennes: Sur l’impuissance du diable et Sur l’obscurité des prophéties.” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 57: 89108.Google Scholar
Satran, David. 1995. Biblical Prophets in Byzantine Palestine: Reassessing the Lives of the Prophets. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Speyer, Wolfgang. 1974. “Zum Bild des Apollonios von Tyana bei Heiden und Christen.Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 17: 4763.Google Scholar
Sütterlin-Aussedat, Mathilde. 2006. Les chaînes exégétiques grecques sur le livre de Jérémie (chap 1–4). Présentation, édition critique, traduction française, commentaire (PhD thesis, 2 vols., Université de Paris IV).Google Scholar
Timotin, Andrei. 2012. La démonologie platonicienne: Histoire de la notion de daimôn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Timotin, Andrei. 2016. “Techniques d’interprétation dans les clés des songes byzantines.” In Carroy, Jacqueline and Lancel, Juliette (eds.), Clés des songes et sciences des rêves de l’Antiquité à Freud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 4760.Google Scholar
Timotin, Andrei. 2019. “Divination et providence dans le néoplatonisme tardif (Jamblique et Proclus).” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 7197.Google Scholar
Van den Ven, Paul (ed.). 1970. La Vie ancienne de S. Syméon Stylite le Jeune (521–592). Brussels: Société des Bollandistes.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1999. ‘The Chaldean Oracles.’ In Athanassiadi, Polymnia and Frede, Michael (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press, pp. 149–83.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 2006. La lutte pour l’orthodoxie dans le platonisme tardif. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco. 1992. ‘Porphyry’s Judgment on Origen.’ In Daly, Robert (ed.), Origeniana V. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 351–67.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco. 2019. ‘Porphyry at Origen’s School at Caesarea.’ In Bitton-Ashkelony, Brouria, Irshai, Oded, Kofsky, Aryeh, Newman, Hillel, and Perrone, Lorenzo (eds.), Origeniana Duodecima: Origen’s Legacy in the Holy Land. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 267–84.Google Scholar
Beerden, Kim. 2013. Worlds Full of Signs: Ancient Greek Divination in Context. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Behr, John. 2018. Origen: First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Hans. 2017. Scripture as a Real Presence: Sacramental Exegesis in the Early Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar
Böhm, Thomas. 2002. ‘Origenes – Theologe und (Neu-)Platoniker?Adamantius 8: 723.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, Mauro and Helmig, Christoph (eds.). 2007. Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, Mauro, Lévy, Carlos, and Steel, Carlos (eds.). 2007. A Platonic Pythagoras. Studies on Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, Mauro and Opsomer, Jan (eds.). 2009. The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. 2004. ‘By Way of Apology: Dawson, Edwards, Origen.Studia Philonica Annual 16: 188217.Google Scholar
Bryan, Jenny, Wardy, Robert, and Warren, James (eds.). 2018. Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, Riccardo. 2015. ‘Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background.’ In Marmodoro, Anna and Prince, Brian (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3150.Google Scholar
Clark, Stephen. 2021. ‘Plotinus, Eriugena and the Uncreated Image.’ In Eriugena’s Christian Neoplatonism and its Sources in Patristic Philosophy and Ancient Philosophy, dir. Ilaria Ramelli, Oxford University, October 2021. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 3350.Google Scholar
Digeser, Elizabeth. 2016. ‘The Usefulness of Borderlands Concepts in Ancient History.’ In North, Michael and Lee, John (eds.), Globalizing Borderland Studies. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 1532.Google Scholar
Digeser, Elizabeth, Marx-Wolf, Heidi, and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E.. (eds.). in press. Problems in Ancient Biography: The Construction of Professional Identity in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Edward. 2009. ‘Descending Spirit and Descending Gods: A “Greek” Interpretation of the Spirit’s “Descent as a Dove” in Mark 1:10.Journal of Biblical Literature 128: 759–80.Google Scholar
Doerrie, Heinrich. 1976. Platonica Minora. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Döpp, Siegmar. 2018. ‘Calcidius.’ In Riedweg, Christoph, Christoph, Horn, and Dietmar, Wyrwa (eds.), Die Philosophie der Antike 5: Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 2327–30.Google Scholar
Dorival, Gilles. 2017. ‘Continuités et innovations de l’écriture théologique des Pères grecs.’ In Pouderon, Bernard and Usacheva, Anna (eds.), Dire Dieu: Principes méthodologiques de l’écriture sur Dieu en patristique. Paris: Beauchesne, pp. 3544.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2013. Image, Word and God in the Early Christian Centuries. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 2017. ‘Introduction: A Historiographical Essay.’ In Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126.Google Scholar
Erler, Michael, Heßler, Jan Erik, and Petrucci, Federico M.. 2021. Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fattal, Michel. 2014. Du Logos de Plotin au Logos de saint Jean. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Fauquier, Frédéric. 2018. Le Parménide au miroir des platonismes: logique, ontologie, théologie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Fernández, Samuel. 2017. ‘The Pedagogical Structure of Origen’s De principiis.’ In Ramelli, Ilaria (ed.), in collaboration with Corrigan, Kevin, Maspero, Giulio and Tobon, Monica, Evagrius between Origen, the Cappadocians, and Neoplatonism. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 1522.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. 1986. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1987. ‘Théologie, exégèse, révélation, écriture dans la philosophie grecque.’ In Tardieu, Michel (ed.), Les règles de l’interprétation. Paris: Cerf, pp. 1334.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacroix, Francis and Narbonne, Jean-Marc. (eds.). 2019. Introduction and Commentary to Plotinus’ Treatise 33 (II 9) Against the Gnostics and Related Studies. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, and Riedweg, Christoph. 2018. ‘Hauptsächliche literarische Gattungen philosophischer Wissensvermittlung und Methoden der Textinterpretation in historischer Perspektive.’ In Männlein-Robert, Irmgard and Riedweg, Christoph (eds.), Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 64–8.Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. 2007. Origenes und sein Erbe. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marx, Heidi. 2016. Spiritual Taxonomies and Ritual Authority: Platonists, Priests, and Gnostics in the Third Century CE. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret. 2004. ‘Epiphanic Evolutions in Earliest Christianity’. Illinois Classical Studies 29: 183–20.Google Scholar
Moss, Candida. 2004. ‘The Transfiguration: An Exercise in Markan Accommodation.Biblical Interpretation 12: 6989.Google Scholar
Narbonne, Jean-Marc. 2011. Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobili, Cecilia. 2019. ‘Delphi and the Nostalgic Evocation of Classical Greece.Ancient Narrative 16: 122.Google Scholar
Ober, Joshua. 2022. The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. 2018. ‘Proclus and the Authority of Plato.’ In Tarrant, Harold (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 498514.Google Scholar
Potter, David. 2015. ‘Chaldaean Oracles.’ Oxford Classical Dictionary. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2005. ‘Nostra autem conversatio in caelis est.’Sileno 31: 139–58.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2006a. Il βασιλεύς come νόμος ἔμψυχος. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2006b. Tutti i commenti a Marziano Capella. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. 2007. ‘Christian Soteriology and Christian Platonism: Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Biblical and Philosophical Basis of the Doctrine of Apokatastasis.’ Vigiliae Christianae 61: 313–56.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2008a. ‘Philosophical Allegoresis of Scripture in Philo and its Legacy in Gregory of Nyssa.Studia Philonica Annual 20: 5599.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2008b. Stoici romani minori. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009a. ‘Origen, Bardaisan, and the Origin of Universal Salvation.Harvard Theological Review 102: 135–68.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009b. ‘Origen, Patristic Philosophy, and Christian Platonism: Re-Thinking the Christianisation of Hellenism.Vigiliae Christianae 63: 217–63.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009–19. Bardaisan of Edessa, Piscataway: Gorgias. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011a. ‘Origen’s Anti-Subordinationism and Its Heritage.Vigiliae Christianae 65: 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011b. ‘Origen the Christian Middle/Neoplatonist: New Arguments for a Possible Identification.Journal of Early Christian History 1: 98130.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011c. ‘The Philosophical Stance of Allegory in Stoicism and its Reception in Platonism, “Pagan” and Christian.International Journal of the Classical Tradition 18: 335–71.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012a. ‘Mara Bar Serapion: Comments on the Syriac Edition, Translation, and Notes by David Rensberger.’ In Merz, Annette and Tieleman, Teun (eds.), The Letter of Mara bar Serapion in Context. Leiden: Brill, pp. 205–31.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012b. ‘Origen, Greek Philosophy, and the Birth of the Trinitarian Meaning of Hypostasis.Harvard Theological Review 105: 302–50.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2013. The Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2014. ‘Valuing Antiquity in Antiquity by Means of Allegoresis.’ In Ker, James and Pieper, Christoph (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World: Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values VII. Leiden: Brill, pp. 485507.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2015. ‘Proclus and Christian Neoplatonism.’ In Knežević, Mikonja (ed.), The Ways of Byzantine Philosophy. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, pp. 3770.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016a. ‘Origen’s Allegoresis of Plato’s and Scripture’s Myths.’ In Desrosiers, Nathaniel P. and Vuong, Lily C. (eds.), Religious Competition in the Greco-Roman World. Atlanta: SBL, pp. 85106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016b. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017a. ‘Origen and the Platonic Tradition.’ In Warren, J. Smith, (ed.), Plato and Christ: Platonism in Early Christian Theology, Religions, 8(2)21: 120.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017b. ‘Proclus of Constantinople and Apokatastasis.’ In Butorac, David and Layne, Danielle (eds.), Proclus and His Legacy. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 95122.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018a. ‘Origen.’ In Marmodoro, Anna and Cartwright, Sophie (eds.), A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–66.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018b. ‘Origen to Evagrius,’ in Tarrant, Harold, Baltzly, Dirk, Layne, Danielle and Renaud, François (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 271–91.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018c. ‘The Role of Allegory, Allegoresis, and Metaphor in Paul and Origen.Journal of Graeco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 14: 130–57.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2019a. ‘Autobiographical Self-Fashioning in Origen.’ In Niehoff, Maren, Levinson, Joshua (eds.), Self, Self-Fashioning and Individuality in Late Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 273–92.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2019b. ‘Philo’s Dialectics of Apophatic Theology, His Strategy of Differentiation, and His Impact on Patristic Exegesis and Theology.Philosophy 3: 3692.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020a. ‘Epicureanism and Early Christianity.’ In Mitsis, Phillip (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Epicurus and Epicureanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 582612.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020b. ‘The Father in the Son, the Son in the Father in the Gospel of John: Sources and Reception of Dynamic Unity in Middle and Neoplatonism, “Pagan” and Christian.Journal of the Bible and its Reception 7: 3166.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020c. ‘The Logos/Nous One-Many between “Pagan” and Christian Platonism.’ In Brian, Nicholas Baker, Lössl, Josef, and Vinzent, Markus (eds.), Studia Patristica CII. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 175204.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020d. ‘Making the Bible World Literature: The Vulgate and Ancient Versions.’ In Ramelli, Ilaria and Denecke, Wiebke (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Companion to World Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 267–79.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020e. ‘Time and Eternity.’ In The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Philosophy. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 4154.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021a. ‘City, Motherhood, and Parenthood in the Ideal Politeia in Plato and the first Stoics: The Problem of Oikeiosis and Later Developments.’ In Pedrucci, Giulia (ed.), Mothering(s) and Religions. Rome: Scienze e Lettere, pp. 257–76.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021b. ‘From God to God: Eriugena’s Protology and Eschatology against the Backdrop of His Platonic Patristic Sources.’ In Eriugena’s Christian Neoplatonism and Its Sources in Patristic Philosophy and Ancient Philosophy, dir. Ilaria Ramelli, Oxford University. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 99123.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021c. ‘Origen’s Exegesis of the Bible against the Backdrop of Ancient Philosophy and Hellenistic and Rabbinic Judaism.’ Main lecture at The Bible: Its Translations and Interpretations in the Patristic Time, KUL 16–17 October 2019. Studia Patristica 103, 1358.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021d. ‘“Pagan” and Christian Platonism in Dionysius: The Double-Reference Scheme and Its Meaning.’ In Lauritzen, Frederick and Klitenic Wear, Sarah (eds.), Byzantine Platonists 284–1453. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press, pp. 92112.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021e. ‘The Question of Origen’s Conversion and His Philosophico-Theological Lexicon of Epistrophē.’ In Wallace, James and Despotis, Athanasios (eds.), Greek and Byzantine Philosophical Exegesis. Leiden: Brill, pp. 61108.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021f. ‘The Reception of Paul’s Nous in the Christian Platonism of Origen and Evagrius.’ In Frey, Jörg and Nägele, Manuel (eds.), Der νοῦς bei Paulus (WUNT 464). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 279316.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021g. ‘Soma (Σῶμα).’ In Das Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 30. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, pp. 814–47.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021h. ‘Stoic Homeric Allegoresis.’ In Manolea, Christina (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Homer from the Hellenistic Age to Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229–58.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021i. ‘The Study of Late Ancient Philosophy: Philosophy and Religion – “Pagan” and Christian Platonism.’ In Griffin, Svetla S. and Ramelli, Ilaria (eds.), Lovers of the Soul and Lovers of the Body. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 397402.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022a. ‘The Legacy of Origen in Gregory of Nyssa’s Theology of Freedom.Modern Theology 38.2: 363–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022b. ‘Origen, Evagrius, and Dionysius.’ In Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios (eds.), Oxford Handbook to Dionysius the Areopagite. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94108.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2024. ‘Secular and Christian Commentaries in Late Antiquity.’ In Gavin, Kelly and Pelttari, Aaron (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022c. ‘Allegorising and Philosophising.’ In Smith, Scott and Trzaskoma, Stephen (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Mythography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–48.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. 2023. “Calcidius’ Identity and Origen,” Eirene 59.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press b. ‘Christian Slavery in Theology and Practice.’ In Longenecker, Bruce and Wilhite, David (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press c. ‘The Construction of the Professional Identity of Origen of Alexandria.’ In DePalma Digeser, Elizabeth, Marx, Heidi, and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. (eds.), Problems in Ancient Biography: The Construction of Professional Identity in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press d. ‘Esoteric Interpretations of Scripture in Philo (and Hellenistic Judaism), Clement, and Origen.’ In Mayer, Toby (ed.), Esoteric Cultures of Scripture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press e. ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’ In The Oxford Classical Dictionary, digital edition.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press f. ‘The Logos in the Johannine Prologue and Its Philosophical Reception.’ In Stanley, Porter and Andrew, Pitts (eds.), Johannine Prologue and Its Resonances. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press g. ‘Matter in the Dialogue of Adamantius: Origen’s Heritage and Hylomorphism.’ In Zachhuber, Johannes (ed.), Cosmology in Late Ancient Thought. Leiden: Brill, pp. 74124.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press h. ‘Philo’s Reception in Augustine.’ In Friesen, Courtney, Lincicum, David, and Runia, David (eds.), The Reception of Philo of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria. In press i. ‘The Relevance of Greco-Roman Literary Themes to NT Interpretation: The Theme of Slavery and Freedom – Gal 3:28 and Relations to Gal 4.’ In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Biblical Exegesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria, and Konstan, David. Terms for Eternity: aiônios and aïdios in Classical and Christian Texts. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2007; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Ratkowitsch, Christine. 1995. Die Cosmographia des Bernardus Silvestris. Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 1999. Demiurge and Providence. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2007. ‘Plato’s Timaeus According to Calcidius.Phronesis 52: 301–27.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2020. Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. 1993. Philo in Early Christian Literature. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique. 1975. ‘Allusions antichrétiennes chez Proclus.Revue des sciences philosophiques et philologiques 59: 553–62.Google Scholar
Spanu, Nicola. 2020. Proclus and the Chaldean Oracles. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy. 2016. The Scriptural Universe of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. 2017. ‘Plotinus, Origenes and Ammonius on the King.’ In Petersen, Anders Klostergaard and van Kooten, George (eds.), Religio-Philosophical Discourses within the Greco-Roman, Jewish, and Early Christian World. Leiden: Brill, pp. 323–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, Joan E. and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. (eds.) 2021. Patterns of Women’s Leadership in Ancient Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. 2016. Anaxagoras, Origen, and Neoplatonism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, Robbert. 2022. ‘Confusion and Sympathy: The Neoplatonic Proclus on the Aesthetics of Epiphany and Theurgic Union’. In Pachoumi, Eleni (ed.), Conceptualizing Divine Unions. Ancient Philosophy and Religion, vol. 7. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229–50.Google Scholar
Vigorelli, Ilaria. 2016. ‘σχέσις in Origen.’ In Jacobsen, Anders-Christian (ed.), Origeniana XI. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 887–96.Google Scholar
Waszink, Jan H. 1975. Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Yarbro Collins, Adela. 2000. ‘Mark and His Readers: The Son of God among the Greeks and Romans.The Harvard Theological Review 93: 8691.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Addey, Crystal. 2011. ‘Book Review: Iamblichus’ Letters, Edited with a Translation and Commentary by John M. Dillon and Wolfgang Polleichtner.International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5.2: 321–3.Google Scholar
Addey, Crystal. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Addey, Crystal. (ed.). 2022. Divination and Knowledge in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1993. ‘Dreams, Theurgy and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of Iamblichus.Journal of Roman Studies 83: 115–30.Google Scholar
Babbit, Frank Cole. 1936 [2003]. Plutarch. De defectu oraculorum. De E apud Delphos. De Pythiae Oraculis. Moralia, vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bettenson, Henry. 1972 [2003]. Augustine: Concerning the City of God against the Pagans. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bidez, Josef. 1913 [1964]. Vie de Porphyre, le philosophe neo-platonicien. Ghent: E. van Goethem.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, Hugh. 2005. Classical Athens and the Delphic Oracle. Divination and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
John, Burnet. (ed.) 1900 [1967]. Platonis opera, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Dylan M. 2020. ‘Alexander of Lycopolis and Titus of Bostra on Manichaeism and Providence.’ In Oerter, Wolf B. and Vitkova, Zuzana (eds.), Coptica, Gnostica und Mandaica: Sprache, Literatur und Kunst als Medien interreligiöser Begegnung(en). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Bussanich, John. 2005. ‘Review article: Iamblichus: De Mysteriis. Translated by Emma C. Clarke, John M. Dillon and Jackson P. Hershbell. Iamblichus. De Anima. Text, Translation and Commentary by John M. Dillon and John F. Finamore.’ Ancient Philosophy 25(2): 478–94.Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold. 1976. Plutarch. Moralia, Vol. XIII. Part 2: Stoic Essays. Against the Stoics on Common Conceptions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 1999. ‘Translate into Greek: Porphyry of Tyre on the New Barbarians’. In Miles, R. (ed.), Constructing Identities in Late Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 112–32.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 2007. ‘Augustine’s Porphyry and the Universal Way of Salvation.’ In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 127–40.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 2009. ‘Can We Talk? Augustine and the Possibility of Dialogue.’ In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–54.Google Scholar
Clarke, Emma C. 2001. Iamblichus’ De Mysteriis: A Manifesto of the Miraculous. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Clarke, Emma C., Dillon, John, and Hershbell, Jackson P. (eds.). 2003. Iamblichus: On the Mysteries. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Des Places, Édouard (ed.). 1974–80. Eusèbe de Césarée: La Préparation Évangélique. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Dillon, John, and Hershbell, Jackson (eds.). 1991. Iamblichus. On the Pythagorean Way of Life (De Vita Pythagorica). Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Dillon, John, and Polleichtner, Wolfgang (eds.). 2012. Iamblichus: Letters. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Dodds, Eric R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dombart, B., and Kalb, A (eds.). 1955. Augustine. De Civitate Dei. CCSL 47–8. Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2003. ‘Two Images of Pythagoras: Iamblichus and Porphyry’. In Blumenthal, Henry J. and Clark, Gillian (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, pp. 159–72.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2007. ‘Porphyry and the Christians’. In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
Gallop, David. 1991. Aristotle: On Sleep and Dreams. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. H. 1903 [1981]. Eusebius: Preparation for the Gospel. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar
Girgenti, Giuseppe, and Muscolino, Giuseppe (eds). 2011. Porfirio: Filosofia Rivelata Dagli Oracoli. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon (ed.). 2009. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (ed.) (2005). Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques 4: de Labeo à Ovidius. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Hammond, Carolyn J.-B. (ed.). 2016. Augustine. Confessions, Vol. II: Books 9–13. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, George, and Sheppard, Anne (eds.). 2007. Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Kindt, Julia. 2022. ‘The Enigmatic Divine Voice and the Problem of Human Misinterpretation’. In Addey, Crystal (ed.), Divination and Knowledge in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 3049.Google Scholar
Long, Alex. 2009. ‘Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue Form’. In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4559.Google Scholar
Louis, P. 1945. Albinus: Épitomé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Marchant, E. C. 1970. Xenophontis opera omnia, Vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marx-Wolf, Heidi. 2016. Spiritual Taxonomies and Ritual Authority: Platonists, Priests and Gnostics in the Third Century CE. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mastandrea, Paolo. 1979. Un neoplatonico latino Cornelio Labeone (Testimonianze e frammenti). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McCabe, Matt Jackson. 2004. ‘The Stoic Theory of Implanted Preconceptions’. Phronesis 147: 323–47.Google Scholar
Miles, Richard. 2009. ‘Let’s (Not) Talk about It’: Augustine and the Control of Epistolary Dialogue’. In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–48.Google Scholar
Miller Jones, Roger. 1980. The Platonism of Plutarch and Selected Papers. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Robert. 1985. ‘Greek States and Greek Oracles’. History of Political Thought 6(1/2): 298326.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique. 1971. ‘Abammon, Pseudonyme de Jamblique’. In Palmer, R. B. and Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. (eds.), Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 227–39.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe (eds.). 2012. Porphyre: Lettre à Anébon L’Égyptien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe (eds.). 2013. Jamblique: Réponse à Porphyre (De mysteriis). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory. 1995. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory. 2012. ‘The Role of Aesthesis in Theurgy’. In Afonasin, Eugene, Dillon, John, and Finamore, John F. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 91112.Google Scholar
Simonetti, Elsa. 2017. A Perfect Medium? Oracular Divination in the Thought of Plutarch. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrew. 1997. ‘Porphyry and Pagan Religious Practice’. In Cleary, John (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 2935.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrew. 2007. ‘Porphyry: Scope for a Reassessment’. In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 716.Google Scholar
Struck, Peter. 2016. Divination and Human Nature: A Cognitive History of Intuition in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. A. 2007. ‘Platonic Dialectic: The Path and the Goal’. In Corrigan, Kevin and Turner, John D. (eds.), Platonisms: Ancient, Modern and Postmodern. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1740.Google Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×