Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:58:01.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2018

Edited by
Richard Hunter  and
Casper C. de Jonge
Richard Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Casper C. de Jonge
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome
Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography
 , pp. 278 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbenes, J.G.J., Slings, S.R., and Sluiter, I. eds. 1995. Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 1999. ‘Was Rome a polis?’ Classical Antiquity 18: 5–34.Google Scholar
Andrén, A. 1960. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Roman monuments.’ In Hommages à Léon Herrmann. Collection Latomus 44. Brussels. 88–104.Google Scholar
Appiah, A.K. 2016. ‘There Is No Such Thing as Western Civilization.’ The Guardian. 6 November.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1968. Men in Dark Times. New York.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1993. ‘The Addressees of the Ars Poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones, and Epicurean Protreptic.’ Materiali e Discussioni 31: 185–230.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1995. ‘The Impossibility of Metathesis: Philodemus and Lucretius on Form and Content in Poetry.’ In Obbink 1995: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 2004. ‘Horace’s Epistles 1 and Philodemus.’ In Armstrong-Fish-Johnston-Skinner, 2004: 267–98.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. and Oberhelman, S. 1995. ‘Satire as Poetry and the Impossibility of Metathesis in Horace’s Satires.’ In Obbink, 1995: 233–54.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P.A., and Skinner, M.B. eds. 2004. Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin.Google Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. 2007. A Commentary on Herodotus Books I-IV. Oxford.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1978. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques. Tome 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1988. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques. Tome 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1991. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques. Tome 4. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1992. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques. Tome 5. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. and Lebel, M. 1981. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques. Tome 3. Paris.Google Scholar
Avenarius, G. 1956. Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtschreibung. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1966. ‘The Early Historians.’ In Latin Historians, ed. Dorey, T.A.. London. 1–38.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baraz, J. 2012. A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2009. ‘Roman Perspectives on the Greeks.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, ed. Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, Ph. Oxford. 98–113.Google Scholar
Baronowski, D.W. 2011. Polybius and Roman Imperialism. London.Google Scholar
Battisti, D.G. 1997. Dionigi di Alicarnasso: Sull’imitazione. Pisa.Google Scholar
Batstone, W.W. 2009. ‘Postmodern Historiographical Theory and the Roman Historians.’ In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, ed. Feldherr, A.. Cambridge. 24–40.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.A. 1993. ‘The Rape of Lucretia, “Quod metus causa” and the Criminal Law.’ Latomus 52: 550–66.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. eds. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bencivenni, A. 2014. ‘The King’s Words: Hellenistic Royal Letters in Inscriptions.’ In State Correspondence in the Ancient World: From New Kingdom Egypt to the Roman Empire, ed. Radner, K.. Oxford. 141–71.Google Scholar
Benediktson, D.T. 2000. Literature and the Visual Arts in Ancient Greece and Rome. Norman.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. 2015. ‘How to Make a Roman Demosthenes: Self-Fashioning in Cicero’s Brutus and Orator.’ Classical Journal 111: 167–92.Google Scholar
Bocksch, O. 1895. ‘De fontibus librorum v et vi Antiquitatum Romanarum Dionysii Halicarnassensis quaestiones variae.’ Leipziger Studien zur classischen Philologie 17: 165–274.Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. 1938. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Peripatetic Mean of Style.’ Classical Philology 33: 257–66.Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. 1939. The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. A Study in the Development of Critical Method. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G.W. 1965. Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G.W. 1979. ‘Historical Problems in Late Republican and Augustan Classicism.’ In Flashar, 1979a: 57–78.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. 1997. ‘Why did Medea Kill her Brother Apsyrtus?’ In Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art, ed. Clauss, J.J. and Johnston, S.I.. Princeton. 83–100.Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. 1963. Horace on Poetry. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. 1971. Horace on Poetry. The ‘Ars Poetica.’ Cambridge.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 1984. Les Pélasges en Italie. Rome.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 1993. Les Tyrrhènes, peuple des Tours. Rome.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 2004. ‘La chute des décemvirs: aux origines d’un récit.’ In Images d’Origines. Origines d’une Image. Hommages à Jacques Poucet, ed. Deproost, P.-A. and Meurant, A.. Leuven. 139–56.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. 2009. ‘Beyond “identity”.’ Theory and Society 29: 1–47.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. 1896. Das literarische Porträt der Griechen im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Büchler, O. 1936. Die Unterscheidung der redenden Personen bei Lysias: eine stilistische Untersuchung der διήγησις. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bundrick, S.D. 2008. ‘The Fabric of the City: Imaging Textile Production in Classical Athens.’ Hesperia 77: 283–334.Google Scholar
Burck, E. 1964 2. Die Erzählungskunst des T. Livius. Berlin. [first edition 1934]Google Scholar
Bux, E. 1915. Das Probouleuma bei Dionys von Halikarnaß. Dissertation. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 1987. ‘Asianesimo e Atticismo: retorica, letteratura e linguistica.’ In Studi di retorica oggi in Italia. Bologna. 31–53.Google Scholar
Camps, W.A. 1969. An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. London.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2006. ‘Thucydides in Rome and Late Antiquity.’ In Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, ed. Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A.. Leiden. 721–53.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. 1991. ‘Homicides of Honor. The Development of Italian Adultery Law over Two Millennia.’ In The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, ed. Kertzer, D.I. and Saller, R.P.. New Haven. 229–44.Google Scholar
Carter, P. 1992. Living in a New Country: History, Travelling, and Language. London.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1937. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA. 1937.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1939. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1940. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 3. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1943. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 4. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1945. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 5. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1947. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 6. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1950. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Vol. 7. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Chambers, I. 1994. Migrancy, Culture, Identity. London.Google Scholar
Champion, C.B. 2004. Cultural Politics in Polybius’s Histories. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2016. ‘History as an Argument in Hellenistic Oratory: The Evidence of Hellenistic Decrees.’ In La Rhétorique du Pouvoir. Une exploration de l’art oratoire délibératif grec. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 62, ed. Edwards, M.. Vandoevres. 129–74.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. 1993. Démétrios: Du style. Paris.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J.D. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. 2010. ‘Les noms du style chez Démétrios (Ps.-Démétrios de Phalère): collection ou système?’ In Chiron-Lévy, 2010: 71–85.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. and Lévy, C. ed. 2010. Les noms du style dans l’antiquité Gréco-Latin. Louvain.Google Scholar
Closterman, W.E. 2014. ‘Women as Gift Givers and Gift Producers in Ancient Athenian Funerary Ritual.’ In Approaching the Ancient Artifact: Representation, Narrative, and Function. A Festschrift in Honor of H. Alan Shapiro, ed. Avramidou, A. and Demetriou, D.. Berlin. 161–74.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J.M. 2003. Elizabeth Costello. New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1991a. ‘The Augustan Law on Adultery: The Social and Cultural Context.’ In The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, ed. Kertzer, D.I. and Saller, R.P.. New Haven. 109–26.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1991b. ‘Sexuality, Violence, and the Athenian Law of Hubris.’ Greece and Rome 38: 171–88.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. ‘Being Greek / Being Roman: Hellenism and Assimilation in the Roman Empire.’ Millennium Jahrbuch zu Kultur und Geschichte des ersten Jahrtausends n. Chr. 4: 21–42.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2018a. ‘The Space between Subjects.’ In Marginality, Canonicity, Passion, ed. Formisano, M. and Kraus, C.S.. Oxford. 313–28.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2018b. ‘The Promise of the Classical Canon: Hannah Arendt and the Romans.’ Classical Philology 113: 6-19.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1994. Latin Literature. A History. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 2007. The Poetry of Pathos. Studies in Virgilian Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars. London.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. ed. 2013. The Fragments of the Roman Historians. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dainotti, P. 2015. Word Order and Expressiveness in the ‘Aeneid.’ Berlin.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 1991. ‘Aesthetic Response and Technical Analysis in the Rhetorical Writings of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Museum Helveticum 48: 33–58.Google Scholar
Degrassi, A. 1947. Inscriptiones Italiae. Volumen XIII – Fasti et elogia. Fasciculus 1 – Fasti consulares et triumphales. Rome.Google Scholar
Delcourt, A. 2005. Lecture des Antiquités Romaines de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Un historien entre deux mondes. Brussels.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1987. ‘Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories.’ In Herodotus and the Invention of History, ed. Boedeker, D. and Peradotto, J.. Arethusa 20: 147–70.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2002. ‘“I Didn’t Give My Own Genealogy”: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona.’ In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. Bakker, E.J., Jong, I.J.F., and Wees, H.. Leiden. 267–89.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. 2001. ‘Women’s Work: Perceptions of Public and Private.’ In Reading Roman Women. London. 113–32.Google Scholar
Dolar, M. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Donadi, F. 1986. ‘Il “bello” e il “piacere” (osservazioni sul De compositione verborum di Dionigi d’ Alicarnasso).’ Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 4: 42–63.Google Scholar
Donadi, F. and Marchiori, A. 2014. Dionigi d’Alicarnasso. La composizione stilistica. Trieste.Google Scholar
Drerup, E. 1923. Demosthenes im Urteile des Altertums. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H.J. 1965. Nicolaus Damascenus on the Philosophy of Aristotle. Fragments of the First Five Books Translated from the Syriac with an Introduction and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. 2000. Strabo of Amasia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Earl, D.C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eden, K. 1986. Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition. Princeton.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, M.J. 2013a. ‘Hypokrites in Action: Delivery in Greek Rhetoric.’ In Profession and Performance: Aspects of Oratory in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Kremmydas, C., Powell, J., and Rubinstein, L.. London. 15–25.Google Scholar
Edwards, M.J. 2013b. ‘Dionysius and Isaeus.’ In Kremmydas-Tempest 2013: 43–9.Google Scholar
Egger, M. 1902. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Essai sur la critique littéraire et la rhétorique chez les Grecs du siècle d’Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar
Ek, S. 1942. Herodotismen in der Archäologie des Dionys von Halikarnass. Ein Beitrag zur Beleuchtung des beginnenden Klassizismus. Lund.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. 1923. ‘The Function of Criticism.’ Criterion 1: 31–42.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007. Roman Eyes. Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton.Google Scholar
Erker, D.S. 2009. ‘Women’s Tears in Ancient Roman Ritual.’ In Tears in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. T. Fögen. Berlin. 135–60.Google Scholar
Evrigennis, I.D. 2008. Fear of Enemies and Collective Action. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H.R. 1926. Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fantasia, U. 2004. ‘ἀκρίβεια.’ In Lexicon Historiographicum Graecum et Latinum I, ed. Ampolo, C., Fantasia, U., and Porciani, L.. Pisa. 36–66.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1991. ‘Stuprum: Public Attitudes and Penalties for Sexual Offences in Republican Rome.’ Échos du Monde Classique 35: 267–91.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1997. ‘The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric.’ In Roman Eloquence, ed. Dominik, W.J.. London. 91–105.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Livy’s Revolution: Civic Identity and the Creation of the res publica.’ In The Roman Cultural Revolution, ed. Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A.. Cambridge. 136–57.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. 2002. Figures of Speech: Men and Maidens in Ancient Greece. Chicago.Google Scholar
Fisher, N.R.E. 1992. Hybris: A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece. Warminster.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. ed. 1979a. Le classicisme à Rome aux 1ers siècles avant et après J.-C. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 25. Vandoeuvres-Geneva.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. 1979b. ‘Die klassizistische Theorie der Mimesis.’ In Flashar, 1979a: 79–111.Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fornaro, S. 1997. Dionisio di Alicarnasso: Epistola a Pompeo Gemino. Introduzione e commento. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. 1999. Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgement. Historia Einzelschriften 132. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W. 2005. Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary Volume 8. Sources on Rhetoric and Poetics (Texts 666–713). Leiden.Google Scholar
Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. eds. 2012. ‘Introduction.’ In Herodotus and Thucydides. Oxford. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. 1993. ‘History and Rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Journal of Roman Studies 83: 31–47.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1996. Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2001. ‘Dionysius, Lucian, and the Prejudice against Rhetoric in History.’ Journal of Roman Studies 91: 76–93.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 2011. ‘The Style of the Past: Dionysius of Halicarnassus in Context.’ In Schmitz-Wiater 2011a: 93–114.Google Scholar
Fox, M. and Livingstone, N. 2010. ‘Rhetoric and Historiography.’ In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, ed. Worthington, I. Malden, MA. 542–61.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse. Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. 1991. Shifting Paradigms. New Approaches to Horace’s Ars Poetica. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. 1993. ‘La définition de l’histoire comme “mélange” dans le prologue des Antiquités Romaines de Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ Pallas 39: 177–92.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. 1998. Denys d’Halicarnasse: Antiquités Romaines. Tome 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. 2003. ‘Fondements et crises de la royauté à Rome: les règnes de Servius Tullius et de Tarquin le Superbe chez Tite-Live et Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ In Fondements et crises du pouvoir, ed. Franchet d’Espèrey, S., Fromentin, V., Gotteland, S., and Roddaz, J.-M.. Pessac. 69–82.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. 2004. ‘Choisir le meilleur: la royauté élective à Rome selon Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ Ktèma 29: 312–23.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. 2006. ‘Denys d’Halicarnasse et Hérodote III, 80–82 ou Comment choisir la meilleure constitution pour politique Rome?’ Pallas 72: 229–42.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Th. 2003. ‘Was ist gute Dichtung? Horaz und der poetologische Diskurs seiner Zeit.’ Rheinisches Museum 146: 346–64.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1979. ‘Eduard Schwartz e la storiografia greca dell’età imperiale.’ Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa 9: 1033–49.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and The History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1994. ‘Per Dionigi d’Alicarnasso.’ Athenaeum 82: 496–7.Google Scholar
Gaida, E. 1934. Die Schlachtschilderung in den Antiquitates Romanae des Dionys von Halikarnass. Dissertation. Breslau.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2005a. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2005b. ‘Vergil’s Aeneid and Ovid’s Metamorphoses as World Literature.’ In Galinsky, 2005a: 340–60.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. 1975. ‘The Tarquin Dynasty.’ Historia 24: 539–54.Google Scholar
Garland, R. 1985. The Greek Way of Death. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Gaughan, J.E. 2012. Murder Was Not a Crime: Homicide and Power in the Roman Republic. Austin.Google Scholar
Geigenmueller, P. 1908. Quaestiones Dionysianae de vocabulis artis criticae. Dissertation. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gelzer, Th. 1975. ‘Klassik und Klassizismus.’ Gymnasium 82: 147–73.Google Scholar
Gelzer, Th. 1979. ‘Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus.’ In Flashar, 1979a: 1–55.Google Scholar
Gerber, D.E. 1982. Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2007. Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge Philological Society Supplements 30. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Glissant, E. 1997. Poetics of Relation. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. 1978. Antiochus and the Late Academy. Hypomnemata 56. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Görler, W. 1979. ‘“Ex Verbis Communibus ΚΑΚΟΖΗΛΙΑ”. Die augusteischen “Klassiker” und die griechischen Theoretiker des Klassisizmus.’ In Flashar, 1979a: 175–211.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. ed. 2001. Being Greek Under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, K. 1989. Over classicisme. Dionysius van Halicarnassus en zijn program van welsprekendheid, cultuur en politiek. Dissertation. Free University Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gow, A.S.F. and Page, D.L. 1968. The Greek Anthology. The Garland of Philip and Some Contemporary Epigrams. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2012. Horace: Satires, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gozzoli, S. 1976. ‘Polibio e Dionigi d’Alicarnasso.’ Studi Classici e Orientali 25: 149–76.Google Scholar
Gransden, K.W. 1976. Virgil: Aeneid, Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. 2010. ‘Mimicry and Classical Allusion in V.S. Naipaul’s The Mimic Men.’ In Classics and National Cultures, ed. Stephens, S.A. and Vasunia, Ph. Oxford. 100–20.Google Scholar
Greenberg, N.A. 1958. ‘Metathesis as an Instrument in the Criticism of Poetry.’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 89: 262–70.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.T. 1989. ‘Philosophy, Politics, and Politicians.’ In Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society 1, ed. Griffin, M.T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford. 1–37.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A.H. 2013. ‘Where Did Early Roman History Come From?’ Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 56: 79–87.Google Scholar
Grube, G.M.A. 1950. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Thucydides.’ Phoenix 4: 95–110.Google Scholar
Grube, G.M.A. 1961. A Greek Critic: Demetrius On Style. Toronto.Google Scholar
Grube, G.M.A. 1965. The Greek and Roman Critics. London.Google Scholar
Halbfas, F. 1910. Theorie und Praxis in der Geschichtsschreibung bei Dionys von Halikarnass. Dissertation. Münster.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2007. ‘Oratorical Delivery and the Emotions: Theory and Practice.’ In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W.J.. Malden, MA. 218–34.Google Scholar
Hallett, C.M. 2012. ‘The Archaic Style in Sculpture in the Eyes of Ancient and Modern Viewers.’ In Making Sense of Greek Art, ed. Coltman, V.. Exeter. 70–100.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth. Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S., Fyfe, W.H., Russell, D.A., and Innes, D.C. eds. 1995. Aristotle, Poetics. Longinus, On the Sublime. Demetrius, On Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.H. and Nielsen, T.H. eds. 2004. An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 2014. ‘The Ars Poetica and the Poetics of Didactic.’ Materiali e Discussioni 72: 43–54.Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. 1986. ‘The Roman Father’s Power of Life and Death.’ In Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller, ed. Bagnall, R.S. and Harris, W.V.. Leiden. 81–95.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.R. 2003. Paul’s Language of Grace in Its Graeco-Roman Context. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. 1991. ‘Rome et la Grèce.’ In ἙΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ: Quelques jalons pour une histoire de l’identité grecque, ed. Saïd, S.. Leiden. 149–67.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2005. The Talking Greeks: Speech, Animals, and the Other in Homer, Aeschylus, and Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 1989. Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heldmann, K. 1982. Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst. Munich.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1972. Le Vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E.A. 2004. ‘Masculinity and Femininity in the Laudatio Turiae.’ Classical Quarterly 54: 185–97.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2001. ‘From Megalopolis to Cosmopolis.’ In Goldhill, 2001: 29–49.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G.L. 1905. ‘The Origin and Meaning of the Ancient Characters of Style.’ American Journal of Philology 26: 249–90.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1978. ‘Greek Maenadism from Olympias to Messalina.’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 121–60.Google Scholar
Hidber, Th. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hidber, Th. 2011. ‘Impacts of Writing in Rome: Greek Authors and Their Roman Environment in the First Century BCE.’ In Schmitz-Wiater, 2011a: 115–23.Google Scholar
Hill, H. 1961. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Origins of Rome.’ Journal of Roman Studies 51: 88–93.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hogg, D. 2008. Speech and Action in the Antiquitates Romanae of Dionysius of Halicarnassus: The Question of Historical Change. DPhil thesis. Oxford (open access https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid%3A30012af0-0ba8-46cd-a9d8-d53d8d3f73c1).Google Scholar
Hogg, D. 2013. ‘The Decemvirate.’ In The Encyclopaedia of Ancient History, ed. Bagnall, R.S., Broderson, K., Champion, C., Erskine, A. and Hübner, S.. Vol. 4. Malden, MA. 1947–8.Google Scholar
Holder, A. 1967. Pomponi Porfyrionis Commentum in Horatium Flaccum. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 1987. Thucydides. London.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2008. A Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2003. ‘Reflecting on Writing and Culture: Theocritus and the Style of Cultural Change.’ In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. Cambridge. 213–34 (= Hunter 2008: vol. 1, 434–56).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2007. ‘Sappho and Latin Poetry.’ In I papiri di Saffo e di Alceo: atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 8–9 giugno 2006, ed. Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A.. Florence. 213–25.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2008. On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and Its Reception. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009. Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2014. ‘Attic Comedy in the Rhetorical and Moralizing Traditions.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy, ed. Revermann, M.. Cambridge. 373–86.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. 1982. ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d’Auguste: Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30.1: 839–65.Google Scholar
Immisch, O. 1925. Bemerkungen zur Schrift vom Erhabenen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Immisch, O. 1932. Horazens Epistel über die Dichtkunst. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Innes, D.C. 1985. ‘Theophrastus and the Theory of Style.’ In Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., and Long, A.A.. New Brunswick. 251–67.Google Scholar
Innes, D.C. 1995. ‘Longinus: Structure and Unity.’ In Abbenes-Slings-Sluiter, 1995: 111–24.Google Scholar
Innes, D.C. 2002. ‘Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.’ Mnemosyne 55: 259–84.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 2010. ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: Metus hostilis and the Fall of Rome in the Punica.’ In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire, ed. Miller, J.F. and Woodman, A.J.. Leiden. 123–40.Google Scholar
Jahn, O. and Kroll, W. 1964. Cicero, Brutus. 7th edn. rev. by Kytzler, B.. Berlin.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2000. Philodemus: On Poems, Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H.D. 1979. ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus, Vita Vergilii 44).’ Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 2: 67–142.Google Scholar
de Jong, I.J.F. 2002. ‘Narrative Unity and Units.’ In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. Bakker, E.J., de Jong, I.J.F., and van Wees, H.. Leiden. 245–66.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2005. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Method of Metathesis.’ Classical Quarterly 55: 463–80.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2011. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Scholia on Thucydides’ Syntax.’ In Ancient Scholarship and Grammar. Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, ed. Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A.. Berlin. 459–86.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2012a. ‘Clever Composition. A Textual Note on Longinus, On the Sublime 40.2.’ Mnemosyne 65: 717–25.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2012b. ‘Longinus and Dionysius on the Sublime. Rhetoric and Religious Language.’ American Journal of Philology 133: 271–300.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2014a. ‘The Attic Muse and the Asian Harlot: Classicizing Allegories in Dionysius and Longinus.’ In Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden. 388–409.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2014b. ‘Ancient Theories of Style (léxis).’ In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, ed. Giannakis, G.K.. Leiden. 3.326–31.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2017. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Thucydides.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, ed. Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E.. Oxford. 641–58.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. 2018. ‘Eumaeus, Evander, and Augustus. Dionysius and Virgil on Noble Simplicity.’ In Homer and the Good Ruler, ed. van den Berg, B. and Klooster, J.J.H.. Leiden. 157-81.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C.C. forthcoming. ‘Linguistic Naturalism and Natural Style. From Varro and Cicero to Dionysius.’ In Language and Nature in Classical Rome, ed. Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Joshel, S.R. 2002. ‘The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia.’ In Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World: Readings and Sources, ed. McClure, K.. Oxford. 163–87.Google Scholar
Jost, K. 1936. Das Beispiel und Vorbild der Vorfahren bei den attischen Rednern und Geschichtsschreibern bis Demosthenes. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Kaster, R.A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kellum, B. 2003. ‘Sculptural Programs and Propaganda in Augustan Rome: The Temple of Apollo on the Palatine.’ In Roman Art in Context, ed. D’Ambra, E.. Englewood Cliffs. 75–83.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. 1980. Laudatio funebris. Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2014. ‘Archaizing and Classicism in the Literary Historical Thinking of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ In Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden. 357–87.Google Scholar
Kirchner, R. 2005. ‘Die Mysterien der Rhetorik. Zur Mysterienmetapher in rhetoriktheoretischen Schriften.’ Rheinisches Museum 148: 165–80.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D.E.E. 1993. ‘The Great Friezes of the Ara Pacis Augustae. Greek Sources, Roman Derivatives, Augustan Social Policy.’ In Roman Art in Context, ed. D’Ambra, E.. Englewood Cliffs. 27–52.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. 1938. ‘Zu den Quellen der Archaeologia des Dionysios von Halikarnassos.’ Rheinisches Museum 87: 32–50.Google Scholar
Knauer, G.N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Koestermann, E. 1971. C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Iugurthinum. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. 1995. Livy: Ab Urbe Condita, Book VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. eds. 2013. Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D. 1970. ΑΚΡΙΒΕΙΑ: Das Ideal der Exactheit bei den Griechen bis Aristoteles. Göppinger Akademische Beiträge 8. Göppingen.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 2007. ‘The Ars Poetica.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Horace, ed. Harrison, S.. Cambridge. 132–43.Google Scholar
Lamp, K.S. 2013. A City of Marble: The Rhetoric of Augustan Rome. Columbia.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2006. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. 2014. ‘Exemplary Influences and Augustus’ Pernicious Moral Legacy.’ In Suetonius the Biographer, ed. Power, T. and Gibson, R.K.. Oxford. 111–29.Google Scholar
Larsson Lovén, L. 1998. ‘LANAM FECIT. Woolworking and Female Virtue.’ In Aspects of Women in Antiquity. Proceedings of the first Nordic Symposium on Women’s Lives in Antiquity, ed. Larsson Lovén, L. and Strömberg, A.. Jonsered. 88–95.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 1966. Zum Wortfeld ‘Freude’ in der Sprache Homers. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1960. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Munich.Google Scholar
Lendle, O. 1992. Einführung in die griechische Geschichtsschreibung. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1971. Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. Bern.Google Scholar
Levene, D. 1997. ‘Pity, Fear and the Historical Audience: Tacitus on the Fall of Vitellius.’ In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, ed. Braund, S.M. and Gill, C.. Cambridge. 128–49.Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. 1972. ‘Imperial Expansion and Moral Decline in the Roman Republic.’ Historia 21: 626–38.Google Scholar
Lucarini, C.M. 2015. ‘I due stili asiani (Cic. Br. 325; P.Artemid.) e l’origine dell’atticismo letterario.’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 193: 11–24.Google Scholar
Luce, T.J. 1965. ‘The Dating of Livy’s First Decade.’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 96: 209–40.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2003. ‘Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern.’ In Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen – Autoren – Kontexte, ed. Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U.. Darmstadt. 268–86.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, R. 2007. Original Copy. Plagiarism and Originality in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, B. 1993. The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar
McEwen, I.K. 2003. Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
McGinn, T.A.J. 1998. Prostitution, Sexuality, and the Law in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
McHardy, F. 2008. Revenge in Athenian Culture. London.Google Scholar
McNeil, L. ‘Bridal Cloths, Cover-ups, and Kharis: The “Carpet Scene” in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon.’ Greece and Rome 52: 1–17.Google Scholar
Marin, D. 1956. ‘L’opposizione sotto Augusto e la datazione del Saggio sul sublime.’ In Studi in onore di Aristide Calderini e Roberto Paribeni. Milan. 1.157–85.Google Scholar
Marin, D. 1969. ‘Dionisio di Alicarnasso e il latino.’ In Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. Bibauw, J.. Brussels. 595–607.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2007. ‘Speeches in Classical Historiography.’ In A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Oxford. 118–32.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 2013. ‘Polybius, Phylarchus, and “Tragic History”: A Reconsideration.’ In Polybius and his World: Essays in Memory of F.W. Walbank, ed. Gibson, B. and Harrison, T.. Oxford. 73–90.Google Scholar
Martin, P.M. 1993. ‘De l’universel à l’éternel: la liste des hégémonies dans la préface des A. R.’ Pallas 39: 193–214.Google Scholar
Martin, R.H. and Woodman, A.J. eds. 1989. Tacitus: Annals, Book IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martinho, M. 2010. ‘Caractérisation et noms du style moyen selon Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ In Chiron-Lévy, 2010: 201–20.Google Scholar
Masden, J.M. 2006. ‘Intellectual Resistance to Roman Hegemony and Its Representativity.’ In Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance, ed. Bekker-Nielsen, T.. Aarhus. 63–82.Google Scholar
Mazzucchi, C.M. 2010. Dionisio Longino, Del sublime. Milan.Google Scholar
Miles, G.B. 1995. Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Millar, F.G.B. 1987. ‘Polybius between Greece and Rome.’ In Greek Connections: Essays on Culture and Diplomacy, ed. Koumoulides, J.T.A.. Notre Dame. 1–18.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. 2005. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1990. ‘The Herodotean and the Thucydidean Tradition.’ In The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley. 29–53.Google Scholar
Moore, D . W. 2017. ‘Learning from experience: Polybius and the progress of Rome.’ Classic Qusterly 67, 132–48.Google Scholar
Mora, F. 1995. Il pensiero storico-religioso antico. Autori greci e Roma I: Dionigi d’Alicarnasso. Rome.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. 1966. Gratia et sa famille. Paris.Google Scholar
Myres, J.L. 1953. Herodotus: The Father of History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2013. ‘Latein in der griechischen Bildung? Eine Spurensuche vom 2. Jh. v. Chr. bis zum Ende des 3. Jh.s n. Chr.’ In Schubert-Ducrey-Derron, 2013: 281–319.Google Scholar
Nichols, M.F. 2009. Vitruvius and the Rhetoric of Display: Wall Painting, Domestic Architecture and Roman Self-Fashioning. Dissertation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Noè, E. 1979. ‘Ricerche su Dionigi d’Alicarnasso: la prima stasis a Roma e l’episodio di Coriolano.’ In Ricerche di storiografia greca di età romana. Pisa. 21–116.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1909. Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. 2 vols. 2nd ed. Leipzig. [First Edition 1898.]Google Scholar
Northwood, S.J. 1998. Four Studies in the Historiography of Early Rome. Dissertation. Manchester.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. 1997–2005. A Commentary on Livy, Books vi–x. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oakley, S.P. 2010. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Livy on the Horatii and the Curiatii.’ In Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A.J. Woodman, ed. Kraus, C.S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C.. Oxford. 118–38.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. ed. 1995. Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. 1998. Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R.M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J.J. 1997. ‘Virgil’s Style.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. Martindale, C.. Cambridge. 241–58.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Ooms, S. and de Jonge, C.C. 2013. ‘The Semantics of ΕΝΑΓΩΝΙΟΣ in Greek Literary Criticism.’ Classical Philology 108: 95–110.Google Scholar
Pailler, J.-M. 1988. Bacchanalia. La répression de 186 av. J.-C. à Rome et en Italie. Rome.Google Scholar
Parmentier, E. and Barone, F.P. 2011. Nicolas de Damas. Histoires, Recueil de coutumes, Vie d’Auguste, Autobiographie. Paris.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. 2011. ‘Augustus chlamydatus. Greek Identity and the bios Kaisaros by Nicolaus of Damascus.’ In Schmitz-Wiater 2011a: 143–62.Google Scholar
Pavano, G. 1936. ‘Dionisio d’Alicarnasso, critico di Tucidide.’ Memorie della R. Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 68: 251–91.Google Scholar
Pavano, G. 1958. Dionisio d’Alicarnasso: Saggio su Tucidide. Palermo.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2010. ‘Hellenized Romans and Barbarized Greeks: Reading the End of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Antiquitates Romanae.’ Journal of Roman Studies 100: 32–53.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 1996. ‘The Triumviral Period.’ In The Cambridge Ancient History x2: The Augustan Empire, 43 B.C.–A.D. 69, ed. Bowman, A.K., Champlin, E., and Lintott, A.. Cambridge. 1–69.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2004. ‘Plutarch on the Outbreak of the Roman Civil War.’ In Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum fünfundsechzigsten Geburtstag am 15. September 2004, ed. Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K.. Vienna. 317–27.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2007. ‘The Greek Historians of Rome.’ In A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Malden, MA. 244–58.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2010. ‘“Learning from that Violent Schoolmaster”: Intertextuality and Some Greek Views of Roman Civil War.’ In Citizens of Discord: Rome and its Civil Wars, ed. Breed, B.W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford. 105–18.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2011. Plutarch: Caesar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2016. ‘Preparing for Posterity: Dionysius and Polybius.’ In Knowing Future Time in and through Greek Historiography, ed. Lianeri, A.. Berlin. 155–73.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2006. L’ombre du tigre. Recherches sur la réception de Démosthène. Naples.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2015. Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise. Austin.Google Scholar
Pohl, K. 1968. Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten. Untersuchungen zu Dionysios von Halikarnaß, De compositione verborum. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J.J. 1965. The Art of Ancient Greece: Sources and Documents. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J.J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven.Google Scholar
Poma, G. 1984. Tra Legislatori e tiranni: problemi storici e storiografici sull’età delle XII Tavole. Bologna.Google Scholar
Porciani, L. 1997. La Forma proemiale. Pisa.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. 1995. ‘Οἱ κριτικοί: A Reassessment.’ In Abbenes-Slings-Sluiter, 1995: 83–109.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. 2006a. ‘Introduction: What Is “Classical” about Classical Antiquity?’ In Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J.I.. Princeton. 1–65.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. 2006b. ‘Feeling Classical: Classicism and Ancient Literary Criticism.’ In Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J.I.. Princeton. 301–52.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. 2011. ‘Against λεπτότης: Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics.’ In Creating a Hellenistic World, ed. Erskine, A. and Llewellyn-Jones, L.. Swansea. 271–312.Google Scholar
Porter, J.I. 2016. The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W.K. 1975. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Quadlbauer, F. 1958. ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius dem Jüngeren.’ Wiener Studien 71: 55–111.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 1994. The Names of History. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. New York.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1989. ‘Roman Rulers and the Philosophical Adviser.’ In Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, ed. Griffin, M.T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford. 233–57.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. 1982. ‘Notes on the Greek Wedding.’ Arethusa 15: 181–201.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. 2013. ‘The Ars Poetica.’ In Brill’s Companion to Horace, ed. Günther, H.-Ch. Leiden. 499–526.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-C. 1993. ‘Sur deux discours programmes: à propos d’ A.R. 3,10,3–11,11.’ Pallas 39: 125–41.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.R. 1900. ‘The Literary Circle of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Classical Review 14: 439–42.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.R. 1901. Dionysius of Halicarnassus. The Three Literary Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.R. 1910. Dionysius of Halicarnassus. On Literary Composition. London.Google Scholar
Robling, F.-H. and Adamietz, J. 1992. ‘Asianismus.’ In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, ed. Ueding, G.. Tübingen. 1.1114–21.Google Scholar
Rochette, B. 1997. Le Latin dans le monde grec. Recherches sur la diffusion de la langue et des lettres latines dans les provinces hellénophones de l’Empire romain. Collection Latomus 233. Brussels.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J.C. 1998. Suetonius. Volume 1. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1989. Horace: Epistles, Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1964. ‘Longinus’, On the Sublime. Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1973. ‘Ars Poetica.’ In Horace, ed. Costa, C.D.N.. London. 113–34.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1979. ‘De Imitatione.’ In Creative Imitation and Latin Literature, ed. West, D. and Woodman, T.. Cambridge. 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. 1998. ‘The Panegyrists and Their Teachers.’ In The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity, ed. Whitby, M.. Leiden. 17–50.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. and Winterbottom, M. 1972. Ancient Literary Criticism. The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R.B. 2012. Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S.H. 2007. ‘Oratory and Politics in the Empire.’ In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, ed. Dominik, W.J. and Hall, J.. London. 109–21.Google Scholar
Sacks, K.S. 1983. ‘Historiography in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Athenaeum 61: 65–87.Google Scholar
Sacks, K.S. 1986. ‘Rhetoric and Speeches in Hellenistic Historiography.’ Athenaeum 64: 383–95.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A.W. 2006. Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scaglione, A. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present. A Historical Survey. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Scheller, P. 1911. De Hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte. Dissertation. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D.M. 1964. Studies in Demetrius On Style. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D.M. 1975. ‘Theories of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Museum Philologum Londiniense 1: 93–107.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D.M. 1988. ‘Iudicia vulgi: Cicero, De oratore 3.195ff. and Brutus 183ff.’ Rhetorica 6: 291–305.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D.M. 2000. ‘The Intended Public of Demetrius’s On Style: The Place of the Treatise in the Hellenistic Educational System.’ Rhetorica 18: 29–48.Google Scholar
Schlikker, F.W. 1940. Hellenistische Vorstellungen von der Schönheit des Bauwerks nach Vitruv. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.A. 2011. ‘The Image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus.’ In Schmitz-Wiater, 2011a: 234–51.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.A. and Wiater, N. eds. 2011a. The Struggle for Identity. Greeks and their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.A. and Wiater, N. 2011b. ‘Introduction: Approaching Greek Identity.’ In Schmitz-Wiater, 2011a: 15–45.Google Scholar
Scholz, B.I. 1992. Untersuchungen zur Tracht der römischen Matrona. Cologne.Google Scholar
Schubert, P., Ducrey, P., and Derron, P. eds. 2013. Les Grecs héritiers des Romains: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 59. Vandoeuvres / Geneva.Google Scholar
Schubert, W. 1991. ‘Herodot, Livius und die Gestalt des Collatinus in der Lucretia-Geschichte.’ Rheinisches Museum 134: 80–96.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. 2011. ‘“As I thought that the speakers most likely might have spoken…” Thucydides Hist. 1.22.1 on composing speeches.’ Philologus 155: 229–56.Google Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 1986. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his Audience.’ In Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, ed. Moxon, I.S., Smart, J.D., and Woodman, A.J.. Cambridge. 121–41.Google Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 1995. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman Chronology.’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 192–214.Google Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 2000. ‘Authority, Originality, and Competence in the Roman Archaeology of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ Histos 4: 6–49. (http://research.ncl.ac.uk/histos/Histos_BackIssues2000.html)Google Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 2011. ‘“The Sole Glory of Death”: Dying and Commemoration in Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ In Memory and Mourning: Studies on Roman Death, ed. Hope, V.M. and Huskinson, J.. Oxford. 78–92.Google Scholar
Schultze, C.E. 2012. ‘Negotiating the Plupast: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman Self-Definition.’ In Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘Plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, ed. Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C.. Cambridge. 113–38.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. 1903. ‘Dionysius von Halikarnassos.’ Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumsiwssenschaft V.1: 934–61. [Reprinted: Schwartz, E. 1957. ‘Dionysios von Halikarnassos.’ In Griechische Geschichtschreiber. Leipzig. 319–60.]Google Scholar
Sebesta, J.L. 1998. ‘Women’s Costume and Feminine Civic Morality in Augustan Rome.’ In Gender and the Body in the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Wyke, M.. Oxford. 105–17.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. 1991. ‘Womanufacture.’ Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.Google Scholar
Small, J.P. 1976. ‘The Death of Lucretia.’ American Journal of Archaeology 80: 349–60.Google Scholar
Solodow, J.B. 1979. ‘Livy and the Story of Horatius, 1.24–26.’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 109: 251–68.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. 2012. Greece and the Augustan Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spelman, E. 1758. The Roman Antiquities of Dionysius Halicarnassensis, translated into English with Notes and Dissertations. London.Google Scholar
Stephens, S.A. and Ph, Vasunia. eds. 2010. Classics and National Cultures. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996. Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syed, Y. 2005. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tacoma, L. 2016. Moving Romans: Migration to Rome in the Principate. Oxford.Google Scholar
Takács, S.A. 2000. ‘Politics and Religion in the Bacchanalian Affair of 186 BCE.’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 301–10.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. 2006. The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. 1984. ‘Vitae necisque potestas: Le père, la cité, la mort.’ In Du châtiment dans la cité: supplices corporels et peine de mort dans le monde antique. Table ronde organisée par l’École française de Rome. Rome. 499–548.Google Scholar
Too, Y.L. 1995. The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates: Text, Power, Pedagogy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage. Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Turcan, R. 1995. ‘Le Classicisme Augustéen.’ In L’Art Romain dans L’Histoire. Paris. 83–105.Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, J. von. 2005. ‘The Formation of the “Annalistic Tradition”: The Example of the Decemvirate.’ In Social Struggles in Ancient Rome, ed. Raaflaub, K.A.. Oxford. 75–97.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1965. ‘Individual Characterization.’ Eranos 63: 99–119.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1974. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: The Critical Essays in Two Volumes. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1982. ‘The Style of Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the Antiquitates Romanae.’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 2.30.1: 817–38.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1985. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: The Critical Essays in Two Volumes. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Vandiver, E. 1999. ‘The Founding Mothers of Livy’s Rome: The Sabine Women and Lucretia.’ In The Eye Expanded: Life and the Arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. Titchener, F.B. and Moorton, R.F.. Berkeley. 206–32.Google Scholar
Verdin, H. 1974. ‘La fonction de l’histoire selon Denys d’Halicarnasse.’ Ancient Society 5: 289–307.Google Scholar
Wagner-Hasel, B. 2012. ‘Tria himatia. Vêtement et mariage en Grèce ancienne.’ In Vêtements antiques: s’ habiller, se déshabiller dans les mondes antiques, ed. Gherchanoc, F. and Huet, V.. Arles. 39–46.Google Scholar
Walbank, F.W. 1957–79. A Historical Commentary on Polybius. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walker, A.D. 1993. ‘Enargeia and the Spectator in Greek Historiography.’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 123: 353–77.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walt, S. 1997. Der Historiker C. Licinius Macer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2014. Suetonius: Life of Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. 2002. ‘The Relationship between Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ De Imitatione and Epistula ad Pompeium.’ Classical Philology 97: 351–9.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. 2005. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Professional Situation and the De Thucydide.’ Phoenix 59: 246–66.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. 2012. ‘How to Talk to a Roman Student: The Teacher’s Authority in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ De compositione uerborum.’ Illinois Classical Studies 35–36:46–67.Google Scholar
Weissenberger, M. 2003. ‘Lysias 1905–2000.’ Lustrum 45: 7–166.Google Scholar
Welles, C.B. 1934. Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period: A Study in Greek Epigraphy. New Haven.Google Scholar
White, H. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe. Baltimore.Google Scholar
White, H. 1978. ‘Interpretation in History.’ In Tropics of Discourse. Baltimore. 51–80.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2009. ‘Greece and Rome.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, ed. Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, Ph. Oxford. 114–28.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. ‘Greek Poets and Roman Patrons in the Late Republic and Early Empire.’ In Schmitz-Wiater, 2011a: 197–212.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013. Beyond the Second Sophistic. Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2016. Battling the Gods. Atheism in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2011a. The Ideology of Classicism. Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2011b. ‘Writing Roman History – Shaping Greek Identity: The Ideology of Historiography in Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ In Schmitz-Wiater, 2011a: 61–91.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2014. Dionysius von Halikarnass: Römische Frühgeschichte Band 1: Bücher 1 bis 3. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2018a. ‘Getting Over Athens: Re-writing Hellenicity in the Early Roman History of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.’ In The Hellenistic Reception of Classical Athenian Democracy and Political Thought, ed. B. Gray and M. Canevaro. Oxford. 209–35.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2018b. Dionysius von Halikarnass: Römische Frühgeschichte Band 2: Bücher 4 bis 6. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von 1900. ‘Asianismus und Atticismus.’ Hermes 35: 1–52.Google Scholar
Williams, R. and Orrom, M. 1954. A Preface to Film. London.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 2005. Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics. Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 2002. ‘History, Poetry, and Annales.’ In Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography, ed. Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P.. Leiden. 331–62.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 2008a. Unwritten Rome. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 2008b. ‘The Legend of Lucius Brutus.’ In Wiseman, 2008a: 292–305.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 2008c. ‘Roman Republic, Year One.’ In Wiseman, 2008a: 306–19.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. 1995. ‘Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism.’ In Abbenes-Slings-Sluiter, 1995: 65–82.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. 2013. Apollodore de Pergame. Théodore de Gadara. Fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. 2015. Caecilius de Calè-Actè. Fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. Four Studies. London and Sydney.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 1994. ‘Becoming Roman, Staying Greek.’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 40: 116–35.Google Scholar
Wooten, C.W. 1975. ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l’époque hellénistique.’ Revue des études grecques 88: 94–104.Google Scholar
Wooten, C.W. 1987. Hermogenes: On Types of Style. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Wooten, C.W. 1989. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Hermogenes on the Style of Demosthenes.’ American Journal of Philology 110: 576–88.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2015. Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wysłucha, K. 2012. ‘The Role of Music in Ancient Rhetoric.’ Papers on Rhetoric 11: 224–36.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 1996. Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1987. Augustus und die Macht der Bilder. Munich.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. 1995. Cicero: De Re Publica, Selections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zizek, S. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge, Casper C. de Jonge, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647632.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge, Casper C. de Jonge, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647632.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Richard Hunter, University of Cambridge, Casper C. de Jonge, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Book: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome
  • Online publication: 12 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647632.013
Available formats
×