Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:08:32.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2021

J. Scott Carter
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Cameron Lippard
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

While the Grutter and Fisher decisions appear to signify victories for supporters of affirmative action, the future looks grim, with some scholars arguing that affirmative action as an ameliorative policy is already dead (Moore, 2018). Wendy Moore (2018) argues that years of political and legal attacks, particularly by elite conservative whites and related advocacy groups, have relegated affirmative action to a call to arms among conservatives rather than it being a significant ameliorative policy that could improve the lived experiences of disadvantaged groups and reduce inequality. In other words, affirmative action no longer serves as an effective tool to increase racial equality. This conclusion is not surprising given that even the most minimal use of race as one factor (not the factor) in the higher education admissions process is demonized by conservatives who will not stop until any “preferential treatment” associated with race is ended. This raises eyebrows considering the historical benefits afforded to whites by excluding non-whites for hundreds of years from higher education, and because there are still ways in which white applicants receive preferential treatment outside of their racial classification (eg, via legacy admissions). Furthermore, this move is also disconcerting, given the persistent state of racial inequality in the US today that continues to hold back millions of non-white Americans. While in past cases the Supreme Court has upheld the use of race as one factor but not the factor in higher education admissions, this will probably not happen in future cases.

As described in detail in this book, the fight for and against affirmative action in higher education revolves around the notion of diversity and what it means to both white and non-white students. Does diversity in general and racial diversity in particular serve a compelling interest to colleges and universities as well as the state? The answer to this question in the Supreme Court has been “yes” up to this point, but this is not a resounding “yes” due to several split decisions. How an affirmative action policy must be implemented today requires it being narrowly tailored to address a clear need or goal of the institution. However, despite having to pass strict scrutiny and despite its minimal impact, conservative politicians along with many citizens continue to push forward with an anti-affirmative action agenda.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Death of Affirmative Action?
Racialized Framing and the Fight Against Racial Preference in College Admissions
, pp. 189 - 202
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusions
  • J. Scott Carter, University of Central Florida, Cameron Lippard, Appalachian State University, North Carolina
  • Book: The Death of Affirmative Action?
  • Online publication: 04 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529201130.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusions
  • J. Scott Carter, University of Central Florida, Cameron Lippard, Appalachian State University, North Carolina
  • Book: The Death of Affirmative Action?
  • Online publication: 04 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529201130.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusions
  • J. Scott Carter, University of Central Florida, Cameron Lippard, Appalachian State University, North Carolina
  • Book: The Death of Affirmative Action?
  • Online publication: 04 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529201130.008
Available formats
×