Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:51:00.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Marina Fortuna
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Kostia Gorobets
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Panos Merkouris
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Andreas Føllesdal
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Geir Ulfstein
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Pauline Westerman
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Type
Chapter
Information
Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
Theories, Methods and Interactions
, pp. 353 - 368
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Index

Adjudicated Law model of CIL, 60
coherence and, 71
common law compared, 60
ECtHR and, 6061
ICJ and, 69
interpretive path, 70
as justification-based source, 61, 62
Legislated Law model of CIL compared, 72
Negotiated Law model of CIL compared, 61, 69
overview, 53
Adler, Ruth, 266
aggression, prohibition as jus cogens, 219220
Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), 179
Alexy, Robert, 266
ambiguity
defined, 194
of indispensable parties principle, 199
judicial effectiveness contrasted, 192, 194
Ammoun, Fouad, 244245
analogy, 115116
anticipatory self-defence, 63
application of CIL, interpretation prior to, 20
arbitration, 204205
Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA)
case-by-case analysis, 154
control under, 149150
factual context of rules, 142
judicial reasoning regarding threshold of control, 150153
legal context of rules, 142
non-binding nature of, 131132
overview, 130
statement of reasons for tribunal decision, 152, 154155
state-owned enterprises and, 138141
attribution
Contras and, 132133
ICJ and, 136, 141
ICTY and, 133134, 136, 141
state-owned enterprises and, 132, 134135, 150151
al-Bashir, Omar, 9899, 282283, 291
basic social entities, 3839
Bodansky, Daniel, 18
Boltzmann, Ludwig, 91
Bos, Maarten, 189
Bossa, Solomy Balungi, 94
Bradley, Curtis A, 13, 29
Broches, Aaron, 146
Brussels II Regulation, 182183
Caflisch, Lucius, 221, 227
Cassese, Antonio, 28, 97
chaotic systems, 82
chess, 3940, 50
Choi, Stephen, 1718, 268269
chronological paradox
CIL metarule and, 4243, 47
constitutive rules and, 36
good faith principle and, 2627, 4950
ILC and, 26
opinio juris and, 2829
overview, 2526
rejection of obligation element as possible solution, 30
risks of, 26
rule identification and, 31
CIL metarule
chronological paradox and, 4243, 47
conditions, 4143
as constitutive rule, 49
first explanation, 4344, 49
good faith principle and, 4450
is/ought gap, 4344, 49
jus cogens and, 48, 50
legal nature of obligation, 44, 49
legitimate expectations and, 4547
overview, 40
second explanation, 4344, 4950
as unspoken behind-the-scenes rule, 50
circularity
of CIL, 2930
of identification of CIL, 18
of opinio juris, 1213, 1617
CJEU. See Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
Clausius, Rudolf, 90
coherence
Adjudicated Law model of CIL and, 71
comprehensiveness and, 300, 306307, 308
consistency and, 300, 302304, 308
contextualisation and, 320322. See also contextualisation
correctness and, 300, 304306, 308
defined, 300
dual role of, 300, 309, 314316, 325
framing and, 317320. See also framing
ILC on, 301
as independent concept with own content, 308309
indicators of, 300, 316317
lack of scholarly attention to, 300301
legal reasoning and, 300, 325
Legislated Law model of CIL and, 72
methodological dimension, 300, 309, 315316, 325
Negotiated Law model of CIL and, 7273
overview, 71, 75, 299300
reflexivity and, 322325. See also reflexivity
self-defence and, 305
substantive dimension, 300, 309, 315316, 325
VCLT and, 301
collective acceptance, 3031
command responsibility, 273274
Committee against Torture, 226
common law
Adjudicated Law model of CIL compared, 60
state practice compared, 13
‘communities of practice’, 233234
complexity theory
complicatedness distinguished, 84
diversity of actors, 8486, 88
dynamic complexity, 79, 8083
judicial discretion and, 88
shared understanding of CIL and, 86
social system, CIL as, 7980, 8388
two-level complexity in CIL, 88
comprehensiveness, coherence and, 300, 306307, 308
conflicting norms
in ICC, 282
as legal dilemma, 293294
overview, 282284
practical concordance. See practical concordance
reconciliation of, 288, 291292, 295296
consistency, coherence and, 300, 302304, 308
constitutive rules, 36, 40, 49
constructive interpretation, 3234, 97
constructive rules, 109110
contextualisation, 320322
defined, 320
head-of-state immunity and, 321322
ICC and, 321322
interpretation and, 320321, 322
normative contextualisation and, 212214
order and priority, imposing, 325
overview, 300, 316
systemic contextualisation and, 212214
continental shelf, 42, 114, 115116, 265, 313314
control
under ARSIWA, 149150
case-by-case analysis, 136, 153154
Contras and, 132133
corporate plus effective control, 141, 150
‘effective control’ test. See ‘effective control’ test)
hybrid control tests, 141
ICJ and, 136, 141
ICTY and, 133134, 136, 141
international investment, control tests in, 137142
interpretation of, 132
judicial reasoning regarding threshold of control, 143, 150153
lower thresholds for control, 138141
statement of reasons for tribunal decision, 152, 154155
state-owned enterprises, control tests, 132, 134135, 138141, 151152
Convention against Torture (1984), 223, 272
Convention on the Continental Shelf (1958), 265
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (1982), 114
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) (1965), 145146, 148, 152, 314
correctness
coherence and, 300, 304306, 308
demonstrable correctness, 304305
determinate correctness, 304, 305
Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
Advocates General, 167169
boundaries of EU law and, 162
determination of CIL in, 122
as domestic court, 184
erga omnes obligations and, 166
EU institutions and, 162
EU law, interpretation of, 164165, 181183
ICJ rulings, reliance on, 158159
identification of CIL in, 176
importance of CIL in, 160163
indispensable parties principle in, 205206
interpretation of CIL generally, 156160, 163164, 165166, 185
‘mirroring’ of CIL norms, 178
‘multiplying’ effect in, 166
natural resources, state sovereignty over, 170178, 183
obligation not to defeat object and purpose of treaties and, 178180, 182
PCIJ rulings, reliance on, 158159
reluctance to analyse CIL, 183184
‘re-packaging’ of CIL norms, 178
resources of, 184
self-determination and, 170178, 183
‘snowball’ effect in, 166
state immunity from jurisdiction and, 166170, 182183
territorial scope of treaties and, 180181, 182
two-pronged test for interpretation, 183
VCLT and, 161, 182
crimes against humanity
ICTR and, 95
individual criminal responsibility for, 289
inhumane acts as, 95
jus cogens, prohibition as, 219220
systemic interpretation and, 272273
customary rules
acceptance of, 121122
applicability of, 38
application of, 38
basis for interpretation of, general principles of law as, 249, 252
CIL metarule. See good faith principle
conflicting norms. See conflicting norms
constitutive rules, 36, 40, 49
constructive rules, 109110
critical mass for creation of, 105106
facts, emerging from, 1112
general principles of law, interpretation by reference to, 275278, 280
hierarchy of, 220221
obligation element, 24, 27
‘outer rules’, 47
practice element (diuturnitas), 24, 27
system of rules as a whole, interpretation by reference to, 278279
treaties, interpretation by reference to, 268274, 280
cyberspace, 119
d’Aspremont, Jean, 35, 42, 156
Daudet, Yves, 46
declaratory treaties, 269
deduction
from analogy, 115116
defined, 108
in determination of CIL, 119120, 123124, 127, 165
in ICJ, 105, 112121, 128129
in identification of CIL, 105, 108110, 118119, 124126
from legal principles, 116118
normative deduction, 113114
in PCIJ, 105
‘triangular reasoning’, 116117
without resort to elements, 112121
definitional concepts, 910, 12
demonstrable correctness, 304305
Descamps, Baron Édouard, 42, 44
descriptive interpretation, 3233
determinate correctness, 304, 305
determination of CIL
in CJEU, 122
deduction in, 119120, 123124, 127, 165
foreign ministry determinations, 122123
ICJ on, 122
identification distinguished, 106
by inference, 127128
interpretation prior to, 20
judicial function and, 189
judicial process and, 189
UN General Assembly resolutions and, 123124
deterministic chaos, 82
Dewey, John, 322323
diplomatic immunity, 116
diuturnitas (practice)
in customary rules, 24, 27
as state practice, 27
doctrine of sources, 52, 325
dolus eventualis, 278
domestic courts
CJEU as, 184
general principles of law originating in, 245, 246247
head-of-state immunity in, 115
human rights law, role in, 232
due process, 6970
Dworkin, Ronald, 3334
dynamic complexity, 79, 8083
dynamic interpretation, 159
Eboe-Osuji, Chile, 94
ECtHR. See European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
‘effective control’ test
Geneva Conventions and, 274
in ICJ, 132133, 137138, 141, 149150
in ICTY, 134
international armed conflict and, 274
international investment law, flexibility in, 141, 143, 148150, 154
limitations of, 153154
as standard of evaluation, 152153
state-owned enterprises and, 138
entropic approach to interpretation
in ICC, 94, 9597
in ICJ, 98100
in ICTR, 95
in ICTY, 95
in international criminal courts, 93100, 101
overview, 80, 93, 101
shared understanding of CIL and, 94
in Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 9798
entropy
in CIL, 93
information entropy, 90, 91
interpretation, entropic approach to. See entropic approach to interpretation
overview, 80
in social context, 9192
in statistical mechanics, 9293
in thermodynamics, 9091
equidistance rule, 14, 42
equilibrium, 92
erga omnes obligations
CIL norms as, 172
CJEU rulings and, 166
Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 and, 95
in human rights law, 234
ICJ and, 234
self-determination as, 118, 174
state sovereignty over natural resources as, 174175
EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, 47
European Convention on Human Rights, 225, 226227, 260, 267268
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Adjudicated Law model of CIL and, 6061
general principles of law in, 260
harmonisation through interpretation, 283
indispensable parties principle in, 206207
judicial dialogue and, 220222, 224, 225, 226228
provisional measures and, 225, 226228
state policy, impact on, 100
systemic interpretation and, 267268
European Union
CIL, lack of consent to, 184
CJEU. See Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
exceptions, 165166
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), 272273, 278
facts
customary rules emerging from, 1112
no falsification by, 1011
state practice as fact element of CIL, 4
fair and equitable treatment clauses, 74, 143144
fairness, 6970
falsification by facts, 1011
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, 47, 255256
foreign ministry determinations, 122123
formal activism, 194195
Forrester, Jay, 83
fragmentation
ILC on, 301
judicial dialogue as remedy for, 233235
Legislated Law model of CIL and, 72
Negotiated Law model of CIL and, 56
framing, 317320
goals, formulating, 318
order and priority, imposing, 318319, 325
overview, 300, 316
practice, identifying, 319
prima facie legal relevance and, 320
France, practical concordance in, 293
Gaja, Giorgio, 122
general principles of law
ascertainment of, 244247
as basis for interpretation of customary rules, 249, 252
as category of rules, 241244, 251
CIL compared, 239240
courts and tribunals, role of, 241, 244247
customary rules, interpretation by reference to general principles of law, 275278, 280
disagreement regarding, 240241
domestic courts, originating in, 245, 246247
in ECtHR, 260
elements of crime and, 278
embeddedness with custom, 275277
ICJ and, 276, 277
under ICJ Statute, 241244, 251, 260
ICTY and, 260261, 277278
identification of CIL contrasted to ascertainment of, 247
ILC on, 240241, 276
international law, originating in, 245, 246247
interpretation generally, 240, 263264
overview, 239240, 261262
PCIJ and, 276
principles stricto sensu distinguished, 242244, 251, 260
as ‘relevant rules of international law’, 259261
as secondary rules, 240
as source of rules of interpretation, 252255
systemic interpretation and, 240, 258259, 260, 275278, 280
‘systemic officials’, role of, 241, 244247
transposition of, 245246
Geneva Conventions (1949)
Additional Protocols, 271, 273274
Common Article 3, 95
‘effective control’ test and, 274
erga omnes obligations and, 95
torture prohibition as jus cogens and, 223
genocide
CIL and, 25
jus cogens, prohibition as, 219220
Genocide Convention (1948), 58, 289
Gény, François, 30, 41
Germany, practical concordance in, 283, 291, 292293
gold-digging metaphor, 5
good faith principle
chronological paradox and, 2627, 4950
CIL metarule and, 4450
ICJ Statute and, 44, 45
legitimate expectations and, 4546
opinio juris, as basis of, 2627
in PCIJ, 45
Gorobets, Kostiantyn, 313
grammatical interpretation, 164165
Grotian moment, 79
Grotius, Hugo., 44
Guillaume, Gilbert, 234235, 271
Gulati, Mitu, 1718, 268269
Hague Convention (1907), 116
Hakimi, Monica, 12, 56, 129, 318
Hanson, Norwood Russell, 7
Hart, HLA, 8, 32, 78
head-of-state immunity
contextualisation and, 321322
in domestic courts, 115
foreign ministers and, 118119
ICC and, 94, 285, 286, 291, 321322
ICJ and, 98100, 284285, 286
ICTR and, 286
ICTY and, 286
ILC on, 284
impunity and, 282283, 284
individual criminal responsibility versus, 282283, 284, 286287, 288289, 290291, 296298
interpretation of, 98100
practical concordance and, 296298
rationale for, 284
shared understanding of CIL and, 94
shift from absolute to qualified immunity, 287288
unease regarding, 288
VCLT and, 285
Heidegger, Martin, 8, 12, 20
Helsinki Final Act, 174
Hesse, Konrad, 292
Higgins, Rosalyn, 69, 185
Hofmanski, Piotr, 94
Hollis, Duncan, 248
humanitarian intervention, 8688
human rights law
domestic courts, role of, 232
erga omnes obligations in, 234
identification of, 215, 216
judicial dialogue, role of in identification and interpretation, 214, 219224
jus cogens and, 216217
provisional measures, 225228
public international order and, 230231
hypothetical inference, 128
ICC. See International Criminal Court (ICC)
ICJ. See International Court of Justice (ICJ)
ICJ Statute
CIL under, 27
general principles of law under, 241244, 251, 260
good faith principle and, 44, 45
indispensable parties principle as ‘embodied’ in, 198199, 210
on interpretation, 3435
on legitimate expectations, 4546
two-element test for CIL, 52
ICSID Convention (1965), 145146, 148, 152, 314
ICTR. See International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
ICTY. See International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
identification of CIL
circularity of, 18
in CJEU, 176
deduction in, 105, 108110, 118119, 124126
determination distinguished, 106
Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law (ILC), 52, 157158, 177, 264, 268, 272
general principles of law, contrasted to ascertainment of, 247
human rights law, 215, 216
in ICJ, 106, 109110
ILC on, 106, 111, 254255
indispensable parties principle, 191
induction in, 105, 108110, 126127, 165
as ‘interconnected judicial operation’, 217218
interpretation and, 32, 217218
investigation of state practice and, 5
lack of precision in, 187
non-textual evidence, 34
opinio juris and, 215216
in PCIJ, 111
state practice and, 215216
textual evidence, 3132
uncertainty regarding, 77
immunities rationae personae.See head-of-state immunity
immunity, 63
impunity, head-of-state immunity and, 282283, 284
indigenous peoples, 86
indispensable parties principle
ambiguity of, 199
application of, 191
application versus recognition, 208
in arbitration, 204205
in CJEU, 205206
consolidation of, 207208
development of, 190191
in ECtHR, 206207
effect on absent state and, 201202
as ‘embodied’ in ICJ Statute, 198199, 210
expansion of, 201202
in ICC, 206
in ICJ, 198203
identification of, 191
judicial activism and, 188, 200, 202, 203, 209210
judicial effectiveness and, 209
judicial restraint and, 200, 205206, 208
lack of relevance, 205207
in other international tribunals, 204205
overview, 188, 210
public function, 208209
temporal preconditions, 202203
uncertainty in, 210
in WTO, 206
individual criminal responsibility
for crimes against humanity, 289
head-of-state immunity versus, 282283, 284, 286287, 288289, 290291, 296298
ICTY and, 290
ILC on, 289290
Nuremberg Principles, 289290
for piracy, 289
practical concordance and, 296298
induction
within application of state practice and opinio juris elements, 121128
criticism of, 56
defined, 107108
in identification of CIL, 105, 108110, 126127, 165
problems with, 68
in Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 126
state practice and, 5
inference
determination of CIL by, 127128
hypothetical inference, 128
predictive inference, 127128
universal inference, 128
information entropy, 90, 91
Institut de Droit International, 266
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR), 6061, 226
Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty) (1947), 270271
international armed conflict, ‘effective control’ test and, 274
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Adjudicated Law model of CIL and, 69
analogy in, 115116
attribution and, 136, 141
CJEU reliance on rulings of, 158159
control and, 136, 141
deduction in, 105, 112121, 128129
on determination of CIL, 122
‘effective control’ test, 132133, 137138, 141, 149150
‘elementary considerations of humanity’ and, 113
entropic approach to interpretation in, 98100
erga omnes obligations and, 234
general principles of law and, 276, 277
head-of-state immunity and, 98100, 284285, 286
identification of CIL in, 106, 109110
indispensable parties principle in, 198203
induction in, 125126, 128129
inference in, 128
interpretation in, 98100
judicial dialogue and, 221222, 223, 225
jurisdiction, 211
non-compliance with obligations and, 98100
opinio juris in, 111112
practical concordance in, 294, 295297
provisional measures and, 225
state practice in, 111112
Statute. See ICJ Statute
systemic interpretation and, 266
on torture prohibition as jus cogens, 223
on treaties, 270272, 273
uti possidetis and, 115, 319
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 174, 223
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 174
International Criminal Court (ICC)
conflicting norms in, 282
contextualisation and, 321322
entropic approach to interpretation in, 94, 9597
gap-filling and, 8283
head-of-state immunity and, 94, 285, 286, 291, 321322
indispensable parties principle in, 206
interpretation in, 94, 9597
judicial discretion and, 88
Rome Statute. See Rome Statute
war crimes and, 9597
international criminal courts
entropic approach to interpretation in, 93100, 101
interpretation in, 80, 93100
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
crimes against humanity and, 95
entropic approach to interpretation in, 95
head-of-state immunity and, 286
interpretation in, 95
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
attribution and, 133134, 136, 141
control and, 133134, 136, 141
crimes against humanity and, 95
‘effective control’ test and, 134
entropic approach to interpretation in, 95
gap-filling and, 8283
general principles of law and, 260261, 277278
head-of-state immunity and, 286
individual criminal responsibility and, 290
interpretation in, 95
judicial dialogue and, 222, 224
state responsibility and, 278279
systemic interpretation in, 272
on torture prohibition as jus cogens, 222, 224
on treaties, 273274
international humanitarian law, nuclear weapons and, 271
international investment law
case-by-case analysis, 154
control tests in, 137142
corporate plus effective control in, 141, 150
‘effective control’ test, flexibility of, 141, 143, 148150, 154
fair-and-equitable-treatment clauses, 74, 143144
investment neutrality, 154
judicial reasoning regarding threshold of control, 143, 150153
legal reasoning in, 313
most-favoured-nation clauses, 143144
state-led investment activities, caution regarding, 143147
international law
general principles of law originating in, 245, 246247
harmonisation, role of judicial dialogue in, 231232
judicial activism in context of, 196198
judicial restraint in context of, 196198
modern perception of, 188
‘relevant rules of international law’, 259261
International Law Association (ILA), 111, 122123, 163164
International Law Commission (ILC)
on ascertainment of general principles of law, 244247
chronological paradox and, 26
on coherence, 301
Draft Articles on State Responsibility, 5758, 124125
Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law, 52, 157158, 177, 264, 268, 272
on fragmentation, 301
on general principles of law, 240241, 276
on head-of-state immunity, 284
on identification of CIL, 106, 111, 254255
on individual criminal responsibility, 289290
on interpretation, 35
legal reasoning and, 313
on non-state actors, 27
on opinio juris, 215216, 254255
on state practice, 215216, 254255
on state responsibility, 37
international organisations, role in interpretation, 157
International Tin Council, 110
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), 205
interpretation
in Adjudicated Law model of CIL, 70
of agreements, 68
application, prior to, 20
of arguments, 6465
in CJEU. See Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
constructive interpretation, 3234, 97
contextualisation and, 320321, 322
of control, 132
of customary rules, role of general principles of law, 249, 252
of decisions, 70
defined, 264
descriptive interpretation, 3233
determination, prior to, 20
dynamic interpretation, 159
entropic approach to. See entropic approach to interpretation
evolutive function of, 94
of exceptions, 165166
general principles of law generally, 240, 263264
grammatical interpretation, 164165
harmonisation through, 283
of head-of-state immunity, 98100
in ICC, 94, 9597
in ICJ, 98100
ICJ Statute on, 3435
in ICTR, 95
in ICTY, 95
identification of CIL and, 32, 217218
ILC on, 35
as ‘interconnected judicial operation’, 217218
in international criminal courts, 80, 93100
international organisations, role of, 157
judicial activism and, 195
legal reasoning and, 313314
in Legislated Law model of CIL, 68
legitimacy of, 5253, 64
maxims of, 249251
in Negotiated Law model of CIL, 6465
norms of, 249251
reflexivity and, 324325
rules of. See rules of interpretation
rule-to-case interpretation, 34, 36, 37
source interpretation, 34, 36, 37
source of rules of, general principles of law as, 252255
in Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 9798
of state immunity from jurisdiction, 182183
systemic interpretation. See systemic interpretation
teleological interpretation, 97, 159, 164165, 218
of text, 1819, 21
treaties generally, 263264
‘treaty focus’ of, 248
VCLT and, 6768, 97, 248, 252253
written versus unwritten rules, 248249
investigation of state practice
identification of CIL and, 5
opinio juris as starting point for, 6
investor–state arbitration. See international investment law
Iran–US Claims Tribunal (IUSCT), 135136, 137, 142
is/ought gap, 4344, 49
Israel, individual criminal responsibility in, 290
iteration. See reflexivity
Jennings, Robert, 253254
judicial activism
abstract principles, deriving legal reasoning from, 197198
in context of international law, 196198
defined, 194195
formal activism, 194195
indispensable parties principle and, 188, 200, 202, 203, 209210
interpretation and, 195
judicial effectiveness, relation to, 191
judicial restraint compared, 194, 195196
legal reasoning and, 197198
modification of law, 197
overview, 187188
process or procedure, changing, 197
substantive activism, 194195
will of parties and state consent, ruling against, 197
judicial dialogue
‘communities of practice’ and, 233234
defined, 212
ECtHR and, 220222, 224, 225, 226228
fragmentation, as remedy for, 233235
harmonisation of international law, role in, 231232
ICJ and, 221222, 223, 225
ICTY and, 222, 224
identification of human rights law, role in, 214, 219224
as improving legal decisions, 230
interpretation of human rights law, role in, 214, 219224
jurisprudential objectivism, impact on, 214, 228232
normative contextualisation and, 212214
overview, 211212, 233235
provisional measures and, 225228
systemic contextualisation and, 212214
judicial discretion, 88
judicial effectiveness
ambiguity contrasted, 192, 194
elements of, 192193
harmonisation and, 192193
indispensable parties principle and, 209
judicial activism, relation to, 191
of judicial function, 191192
overview, 186187, 188
public versus private function, 192
rapprochement and, 192193
role of judge in, 193
judicial function
determination of CIL and, 189
judicial effectiveness of, 191192. See also judicial effectiveness
judicial process, determination of CIL and, 189
judicial restraint
abstract principles, deriving legal reasoning from, 197198
in context of international law, 196198
defined, 195
indispensable parties principle and, 200, 205206, 208
judicial activism compared, 194, 195196
legal reasoning and, 197198
jure gestionis, 167, 168169
jure imperii, 167, 168169
jurisprudential objectivism, 214, 228232
jus cogens
aggression and, 219220
CIL as basis for, 219220
CIL metarule and, 48, 50
crimes against humanity and, 219220
Geneva Conventions and, 223
genocide prohibition as, 219220
human rights law and, 216217
ICJ and, 223
ICTY and, 222, 224
as overriding conflicting non-peremptory norms, 220221
piracy and, 219220
racial discrimination and, 219220
slavery and, 219220
torture and, 214, 219220, 222224
VCLT and, 216
Kassoti, Eva, 181
Khalilian, Tags Seyed Khalil, 135136
Kolver, Anatoly, 227
Kooijmans, Pieter, 195, 198, 208
Koskenniemmi, Martti, 18
Kylián, Jiří, 77, 101
Lachs, Manfred, 120
Lauterpacht, Hersch, 195, 198, 200
Law of the Sea Convention, 25
legal reasoning
action intended by, 312313
coherence and, 300, 325
defeasible nature of, 314
ILC and, 313
in international investment law, 313
interpretation and, 313314
judicial activism and, 197198
judicial restraint and, 197198
as practical reasoning, 312314
as purposive activity, 313
theoretical versus practical reasoning, 309311
Legislated Law model of CIL, 57
Adjudicated Law model of CIL compared, 72
coherence and, 72
fragmentation and, 72
interpretive path, 68
as justification-based source, 61, 62
modern custom and, 59
Negotiated Law model of CIL compared, 5960, 67, 68, 72
overview, 53
treaties and, 58
VCLT and, 5758, 68
legitimate expectations, 4546
Lerche, Peter, 293
Llewellyn, Karl, 7, 13
Luhmann, Niklas, 83
MacCormick, Neil, 303
Mahoney, Paul, 195196
Mallarmé, Stéphane, 77
maritime boundaries, 115, 319
marriage, 11
McDougal, Myres, 55
McLachlan, Campbell, 259
Mendelson, Maurice, 18
Mengozzi, Paolo, 168
Merkouris, Panos, 5, 6768, 165
Morrison, Howard, 94
most-favored nation clauses, 143144
natural resources, state sovereignty over, 170178, 183
Negotiated Law model of CIL, 57
Adjudicated Law model of CIL compared, 61, 69
coherence and, 7273
forward-looking nature of, 66
fragmentation and, 56
interpretive path, 6465
as justification-based source, 61, 62
Legislated Law model of CIL compared, 5960, 67, 68, 72
overview, 53
textual interpretation and, 66
traditional custom and, 56
traditional model, 59
Nicaragua, Contras in, 132133
non-state actors
CIL and, 27
ILC on, 27
self-defence and, 62
normative contextualisation, 212214
normative deduction, 113114
nuclear weapons, international humanitarian law and, 271
nullum crimen sine lege, 6970
Nuremberg Principles, 289290
obligation element
in customary rules, 24, 27
in opinio juris, 2728
Odermatt, Jed, 181
opinio juris
belief in obligation, 28
chronological paradox and, 2829
circularity of, 1213, 1617
as claims, 1718
collective acceptance of, 3031
conditions of, 1516
as element of CIL, 111112
evidence gathering, 3132, 35
good faith principle as basis of, 2627
habitual practice distinguished, 2829
in ICJ, 111112
identification of CIL and, 215216
ILC on, 215216, 254255
investigation of state practice, as starting point for, 6
as normative element of CIL, 4
obligation element, 2728
in PCIJ, 111112
plural form of, 22
prescriptive role of, 3031
presumption of, 121
rejection of obligation element, 30, 41
state practice as based in, 34, 16
as subjective element of CIL, refutation of, 3, 4
usage distinguished, 1416
Organization of American States (OAS), 270271, 272
‘outer rules’, 47
Pair, Lara, 195
Parsons, Talcott, 83
Pellet, Alain, 122
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), 204
Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)
CJEU reliance on rulings of, 158159
deduction in, 105
general principles of law and, 276
good faith principle in, 45
identification of CIL in, 111
opinio juris in, 111112
state practice in, 111112
Pescatore, Pierre, 194
piracy
CIL and, 25
individual criminal responsibility for, 289
jus cogens, prohibition as, 219220
Postema, Gerald, 20, 56, 65, 66
practical concordance
as balancing of interests, 291, 292293
broader picture, consideration of, 295296
defined, 291
fundamental rights and, 292293
head-of-state immunity and, 296298
in ICJ, 294, 295297
individual criminal responsibility and, 296298
in international courts, 294295
as methodological lens, 295, 296
overview, 283284, 298
proportionality and, 292
‘thinking outside the box’, 296
unequal legal norms, inapplicable to, 291
practical reasoning
challenging, 311
legal reasoning as, 312314
plausibility and, 311
reconciling and prioritising in, 310311
theoretical reasoning versus, 309311
precedents, 1314
predictive inference, 127128
principles stricto sensu, general principles of law distinguished, 242244, 251, 260
provisional measures, 225228
questions of fact, 106107, 129
questions of law, 106107, 129
racial discrimination, prohibition as jus cogens, 219220
rape, 277278
Rawls, John, 322323
reflective equilibrium, 323
reflexivity, 322325
interpretation and, 324325
order and priority, imposing, 325
overview, 300, 316
reflective equilibrium, 323
Ricoeur, Paul, 21
Roberts, Anthea Elizabeth, 5
Robinson, Patrick Lipton, 114
Rome Statute. See also International Criminal Court (ICC)
gap-filling and, 8283
Legislated Law model of CIL and, 58
non-compliance with obligations, 98100
war crimes and, 9597
Rozakis, Christos, 221
rule-based social entities, 39, 40
rules of interpretation
candidates for, 255258
general principles of law as source of, 252255
overview, 249251
VCLT and, 252, 255256
rule-to-case interpretation, 34, 36, 37
Russell, Bertrand, 42
Scelle, Georges, 81, 96
Schauer, Frederick, 13
secondary rules, 129, 240
self-defence
anticipatory self-defence, 63
coherence and, 305
non-state actors and, 62
treaties and, 270271
self-determination
CJEU and, 170178, 183
as erga omnes obligation, 118, 174
state sovereignty over natural resources, relation to, 170178, 183
sexual slavery, 11
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, 201, 273274
Shannon, Claude E, 9293
shared understanding of CIL
complexity theory and, 86
entropic approach to interpretation and, 94
head-of-state immunity and, 94
humanitarian intervention and, 88
slavery
CIL and, 25
jus cogens, prohibition as, 219220
social entities
basic social entities, 3839
defined, 38
rule-based social entities, 39, 40
social ontology, 3031, 38
social system, CIL as, 7980, 8388
Société Nationale des Autoroutes du Maroc (Moroccan state-owned enterprise), 140
SODIGA (Spanish state-owned enterprise), 139140
Sørenson, Max, 273
source interpretation, 34, 36, 37
sources of CIL
Adjudicated Law model, 60. See also Adjudicated Law model of CIL
doctrine of sources, 52
justification-based sources, 61, 62
Legislated Law model, 57. See also Legislated Law model of CIL
multiplicity of, 76
Negotiated Law model, 57. See also Negotiated Law model of CIL
overview, 54
Special Court for Sierra Leone, 290
Special Tribunal for Lebanon
entropic approach to interpretation in, 9798
induction in, 126
interpretation in, 9798
state immunity from jurisdiction
in CJEU, 166170, 182183
interpretation of, 182183
jure gestionis and, 167, 168169
jure imperii and, 167, 168169
torture and, 221222
state-owned enterprises
ARSIWA and, 138141
attribution of conduct to state, 132, 134135, 150151
control tests, 132, 134135, 138141, 151152
corporate plus effective control, 141
defined, 130
‘effective control’ test, 138
hybrid control tests, 141
international investment law, caution regarding in, 143147
lower thresholds for control, 138141
political risk and, 143
state practice
common law compared, 13
definitional concepts, 12
diuturnitas as, 27
as element of CIL, 111112
evidence gathering, 3132, 35
as fact element of CIL, 4
in ICJ, 111112
identification of CIL and, 215216
ILC on, 215216, 254255
induction and, 5
investigation of, 5, 6
as objective element of CIL, refutation of, 3, 4, 22
opinio juris, as based in, 34, 16
in PCIJ, 111112
presumption of, 121
treaties and, 270
state responsibility
applicability versus application of rule, 37
ARSIWA and. See Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA))
Draft Articles on State Responsibility (ILC), 5758, 124125
ICTY and, 278279
ILC on, 37
systemic interpretation and, 278279, 280
statistical mechanics, entropy in, 9293
Stockholm Declaration, 58
substantive activism, 194195
Sudan, head-of-state immunity and, 94
Switzerland, practical concordance in, 293
Syria, air strikes in, 8688
system dynamics, 83
systemic contextualisation, 212214
systemic interpretation
in CJEU, 159, 164165
crimes against humanity and, 272273
ECtHR and, 267268
gap-filling and, 266267, 268, 280
general principles of law and, 240, 258259, 260, 275278, 280
ICJ and, 266
ICTY and, 272
normative conflict, resolving, 267268, 280
ordinary meaning of words and, 265266, 268, 280
state responsibility and, 278279, 280
systemic argument and, 266, 268, 280
torture and, 272
treaties and, 268274, 280
VCLT and, 265268, 280
systems theory, 83
Szpunar, Maciej, 157
Talmon, Stefan, 5, 69, 108, 113, 116, 127, 129
Tanaka, Kotaro, 3435, 218
Tarski, Alfred, 47
Tassinis, Orfeas Chasapis., 65, 177178
teleological interpretation, 97, 159, 164165, 218
telos, 2021
Templeman, Lord Sydney, 110
text
identification of CIL, textual evidence, 3132
interpretation of, 1819, 21
Negotiated Law model of CIL, textual interpretation and, 66
theoretical framework, law as, 9
theoretical reasoning
challenging, 310
practical reasoning versus, 309311
thermodynamics, entropy in, 9091
Thirlway, Hugh, 194195
Tladi, Dire, 219220
Tokyo Charter, 289290
torture
CIL and, 25
Geneva Conventions and, 223
ICJ on, 223
ICTY on, 222, 224
jus cogens, prohibition as, 214, 219220, 222224
state immunity from jurisdiction and, 221222
systemic interpretation and, 272
treaties
customary rules, interpretation by reference to treaties, 268274, 280
declaratory treaties, 269
elements of treaty interpretation, interpretation of CIL and, 270
ICJ on, 270272, 273
ICTY on, 273274
interpretation generally, 263264
Legislated Law model of CIL and, 58
obligation not to defeat object and purpose of, 178180, 182
provisions, interpretation of CIL and, 270
as running parallel with custom, 269271
self-defence and, 270271
state practice and, 270
systemic interpretation and, 268274, 280
territorial scope of, 180181, 182
travaux préparatoires, 269
‘treaty focus’ of interpretation, 248
VCLT. See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT)
Treaty on European Union (TEU), 156
‘triangular reasoning’, 116117
Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, 277
Truman, Harry, 313314
Türmen, Riza, 227
two-level complexity, 88
Tzekvelos, Vassilis, 265
uncertainty
content of rules, regarding, 77
identification of CIL, regarding, 77
in indispensable parties principle, 210
unpredictability and, 78
United Kingdom, humanitarian intervention and, 8688
United Nations
ARSIWA. See Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA))
Charter, 58, 244, 271
Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), 152, 318319
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 318319
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 114
Declaration on Friendly Relations, 58
General Assembly resolutions, 123124
Human Rights Committee, 6061, 216217, 226
Resolution on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States, 173
Security Council, 282
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 223, 229
universal inference, 128
usage, opinio juris distinguished, 1416
uti possidetis, 115, 319
vaccine donation, 29, 4849
Van den Wyngaert, Christine, 116, 123
Verdross, Alfred, 266
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT)
‘any relevant rules of international law’, 263, 265
capacity to bind states under, 124125
CJEU and, 161, 182
coherence and, 301
head-of-state immunity and, 285
interpretation and, 6768, 97, 248, 252253
jus cogens and, 216
Legislated Law model of CIL and, 5758, 68
obligation not to defeat object and purpose of treaties and, 178179, 182
provisional measures and, 225
rules of interpretation and, 252, 255256
systemic interpretation and, 265268, 280
territorial scope of treaties and, 180, 181, 182
war crimes, 9597
Washington Convention, 140141
Wathelet, Melchior, 209
Westerman, Pauline, 30
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 40, 4142
World Bank, 144
World Trade Organization (WTO)
Appellate Body, 6061, 7374
Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), 73
indispensable parties principle in, 206

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Index
  • Edited by Marina Fortuna, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Kostia Gorobets, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Panos Merkouris, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Andreas Føllesdal, Universitetet i Oslo, Geir Ulfstein, Universitetet i Oslo, Pauline Westerman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Book: Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009541312.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Index
  • Edited by Marina Fortuna, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Kostia Gorobets, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Panos Merkouris, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Andreas Føllesdal, Universitetet i Oslo, Geir Ulfstein, Universitetet i Oslo, Pauline Westerman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Book: Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009541312.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Index
  • Edited by Marina Fortuna, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Kostia Gorobets, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Panos Merkouris, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Andreas Føllesdal, Universitetet i Oslo, Geir Ulfstein, Universitetet i Oslo, Pauline Westerman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Book: Customary International Law and Its Interpretation by International Courts
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009541312.015
Available formats
×