Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:27:10.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - “They all have different policies, so of course they have to give different news”: Images of Human Rights Lawyers in the British Press

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Richard J. Maiman
Affiliation:
Fellow, Human Rights Centre of the University of Essex
Austin Sarat
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts
Stuart Scheingold
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

“What readers get when they pick up their newspaper – and what they miss when newspapers do not arrive – is a particular way of structuring events, of producing ‘the news’ as a coherent reality.”

ACH Smith, Paper Voices

“They all have different policies, so of course they have to give different news.”

Evelyn Waugh, Scoop

Introduction

It has been suggested that cause lawyers' moral commitments have the potential to legitimate and even enhance the public's view of the legal profession. The likelihood of this occurring clearly depends on first, whether the public recognizes such a commitment in the work of cause lawyers, and second, whether the public subscribes to the particular moral principles underlying that work. These questions help focus our attention on the content of the messages about cause lawyers disseminated through the media. Recent developments in Great Britain provide an opportunity to examine in detail how one group of cause lawyers has been depicted by the nation's newspapers and to ask whether these depictions conform to a vision of the common good that is shared by newspapers and their readers.

The 1998 Human Rights Act (HRA) subjected all public authorities in the United Kingdom to the restrictions of the European Convention on Human Rights. The HRA greatly expanded the opportunities for Britons to challenge government officials in court; it also magnified the importance of lawyers who actually handle such cases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×