Book contents
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Constitution Writing and Religion under Limited Sovereignty
- Part II Postcolonial French-Influenced Constitution Writing and Religion
- Part III Postcolonial South Asian Constitution Drafting and Religion
- Part IV Constitution Writing and Religion in Contemporary Middle East
- Part V Lessons from the Cases
- Index
- References
Part I - Constitution Writing and Religion under Limited Sovereignty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Constitution Writing and Religion under Limited Sovereignty
- Part II Postcolonial French-Influenced Constitution Writing and Religion
- Part III Postcolonial South Asian Constitution Drafting and Religion
- Part IV Constitution Writing and Religion in Contemporary Middle East
- Part V Lessons from the Cases
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy , pp. 27 - 98Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bibliography
Aarflot, A. 1980. Religionsfrihet og Offentlig Religion: Grunnlovens 2 i går, i dag og imorgen (Religious Freedom and Public Religion: Paragraph 2 of the Constitution Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow). Report of the Voluntary National Church Council Paragraph 2 committee. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Abrahamsen, S. 1968. “The Exclusion Clause of Jews in the Norwegian Constitution of May 17, 1814.” Jewish Social Studies 30 (2): 67–88.Google Scholar
Anton, T. J. 1969. “Policy Making & Political Culture in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 4: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constitution of Norway. Constitution Finder, University of Richmond School of Law. Available at: www.stortinget.no/en/In-English/About-the-Storting/The-Constitution/The-Constitution/.Google Scholar
Elder, N., Thomas, A. H., and Arter, D. 1983. The Consensual Democracies: The Government and Politics of the Scandinavian States. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. 2011. “Out of Sync: The Disconnect between Constitutional Clauses and State Legislation on Religion.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, G. 2003. “Church-State Separation Swedish Style” in Madeley, J. T. S. and Enyedi, Z. (eds.), Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Hovland, B. M. and Aagedal, O. (eds.). 2001. Nasjonaldagsfeiring in fleirkulturelle demokrati. Copehagen: Nordisk Ministerråd.Google Scholar
Juvkam, P. 1965. “Norway” in Hunter, L. S. (ed.), Scandinavian Churches: A Picture of the Development and Life of the Churches of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Logue, J. and Einhorn, E. S. 1988. “Restraining the Governors: The Nordic Experience with Limiting the Strong State.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (2): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeley, J. T. S. 1994. “The Antinomies of Lutheran Politics: The Case of Norway’s Christian People’s Party” in Handley, D. (ed.), Christian Democracy in Europe. A Comparative Perspective. London: Pinter, 142–154.Google Scholar
Madeley, J. T. S. 2003. “European Liberal Democracy and the Principle of State Religious Neutrality” in Madeley, J. T. S. and Enyedi, Z. (eds.), Church and State in Contemporary Europe: The Chimera of Neutrality. London: Frank Cass, 1–22.Google Scholar
Madeley, J. T. S. 2010. “America’s Secular State and the Unsecular State of Europe” in Fatton, R. and Ramazani, R. (eds.), Religion, State and Society: Jefferson’s Wall of Separation in Comparative Perspective. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 109–136.Google Scholar
Malmgart, L. 2010. “State and Church in Denmark and Norway” in Robbins, K. (eds.), The Dynamics of Religious Reform in Northern Europe 1780–1921: Political and Legal Perspectives. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Nordby, T. 2002. “The Norwegian Constitution, from Instrument of Governance to Symbol.” Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 43: 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, T. 2011. “Special issue on the Legal Regulation of Religion in the Nordic Countries.” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 24 (2): 111–228.Google Scholar
NOU. 2006. Staten og Den norske kirke. Utredning fra Stat-kirke-utvalget, avgitt 31 januar 2006 (Report of the State-Church Committee, 2006). Available at: www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/kud/dok/nouer/2006/nou-2006-2.html?id=156177.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1967. “Geography, Religion and Social Class: Crosscutting Cleavages in Norwegian Politics” in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Skullerud, Å. 1971. Bonde Oppositionen og Religionsfriheten in 1840 aarene. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Thorkildsen, D. 2012. “The Role of the Church in Contemporary Norway: Changed Relations between State and Church.” Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte 25 (2): 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorkildsen, D. 2014. “Religionspolitikken in Norge før og etter 1814.” Kirke og Kultur: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. 1990. “New Images of Christian Community” in McManners, J. (ed.), The Oxford History of Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 572–601.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Aruga, Tadashi. “The Declaration of Independence in Japan: Translation and Transplantation, 1854–1997.” Available at: http://chnm.gmu.edu/declaration/japanese/aruga2.html.Google Scholar
Aruga, Tadashi. 2009. “Background” in “Guide to Daniel Clarence Holtom Papers.” Online Archive of California. Available at: www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt1s2023xp/.Google Scholar
Kyoku, Chōsa Rippō Kōsa, Dai-ni Ka, Hōritsu Seiji Toshokan. 1956. Nihon koku kenpō seitei keika nichiroku (miteikō no san). Tokyo: National Diet Library of Japan.Google Scholar
Dower, John. 1999. Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Holtom, Daniel Clarence. 1943. Modern Japan and Shinto Nationalism: A Study of Present-Day Trends in Japanese Religions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holtom, Daniel Clarence. 2004. “Iesu Kirisuto no fukuin to heiwa kenpô,” Kirisuto shinbun, November 27.Google Scholar
Kades, Charles L. 1946–1948. “Charles L. Kades Papers,” Harvard University Libraries. Microform, Film W23975.Google Scholar
Kenpō Chōsakai Jimukyoku (ed.). 1959. Nihonkoku kenpō kaisei shōan. Tokyo: Kenpō Chōsakai Jimukyoku.Google Scholar
Mullins, Mark. 1959. “Shintō no tokken haishi, are kara 15 nen,” Asahi shinbun, August 2, 1959.Google Scholar
Mullins, Mark. 2010. “How Yasukuni Shrine Survived the Occupation: A Critical Examination of Popular Claims.” Monumenta Nipponica 65 (1): 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supreme Commander of Allied Powers. 1945. “U.S. Initial Post-Surrender Policy for Japan.” August 22, 1945. Available at: www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/022shoshi.html.Google Scholar
Supreme Commander of Allied Powers. 1946. “Abolition of Governmental Sponsorship, Support, Perpetuation, Control, and Dissemination of State Shinto.” Orders from the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers to the Japanese Government, AG 003. November 6, 1946. CIE, APO 500 (SCAPIN 1318).Google Scholar
Wildes, Harry Emerson. 1954. Typhoon over Tokyo: The Occupation of Japan and Its Aftermath. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Woodward, William. 1972. The Allied Occupation of Japan 1945–1952 and Japanese Religion. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliography
Beckmann, Rainer. 2008. “Der Parlamentarische Rat und das keimende Leben.” Der Staat 47(4): 551–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaschke, Olaf. 2002. Konfessionen im Konflikt. Deutschland zwischen 1800 und 1970: ein zweites konfessionelles Zeitalter. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. 2004. “Der deutsche Katholizismus im Jahre 1933.” in Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (ed.). Kirche und christlicher Glaube in den Herausforderungen der Zeit. Beiträge zur politisch-theologischen Verfassungsgeschichte 1957 – 2002. Münster: Lit, 115–143.Google Scholar
Buchstab, Günter and Gotto, Klaus (eds.). 1990. Die Gründung der Union. Munich: Olzog.Google Scholar
Buchstab, Günter and Kleinmann, Hans-Otto (eds.). 2008. Verantwortung vor Gott und den Menschen. Christliche Demokraten im Parlamentarischen Rat 1948/49. Freiburg u.a.: Herder.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). Der Parlamentarische Rat: 1948–1949. Akten und Protokolle. 14 volumes (Boppard: Boldt/ Munich: Oldenbourg: 1975–2009). [Henceforth Der Parlamentarische Rat.]Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993a. “Document No. 5” (4th session of the committee for fundamental issues, September 23, 1948), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (I): 62–87.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993b. “Document No. 10” (10th session of the plenum of the Parliamentary Council, May 8, 1949), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (I): 538 f.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993c. “Document No. 16” (1st reading of Articles 1–32, Oktober 18, 1948), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (I): 333–340.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993d. “Document No. 18” in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (I): 361–379.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993e. “Document No. 24” (19th session of the committee for fundamental issues, November 9, 1948), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (I): 496–520.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993f. “Document No. 28” (presentation of Articles 1–20 by the editing committee after the first reading, November 16, 1948), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (II), Ausschuß für Grundsatzfragen. Boppard: Boldt: 578–583.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993g. “Document No. 40” (Preamble, Articles 1 to 29c in the revisioned form by the editing committee, December 13, 1948), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (II), Ausschuß für Grundsatzfragen. Boppard: Boldt: 875–891.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1993h. “Document No. 42” (32nd session of the committee for fundamental issues, January 11, 1949), in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 5 (II), Ausschuß für Grundsatzfragen. Boppard: Boldt: 910–953.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1996a. “Document No. 6” (6th session of the plenum of the Parliamentary Council, October 20, 1948) in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 9, Plenum. Munich: Oldenbourg: 176–216.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1996b. “Document No. 9” (9th session of the plenum of the Parliamentary Council, May 6, 1949) in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 9, Plenum. Munich: Oldenbourg: 429–503.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 1996c. “Document No. 10” (10th session of the plenum of the Parliamentary Council, May 8, 1949) in Der Parlamentarische Rat, Vol. 9, Plenum. Munich: Oldenbourg: 504–630.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds.). 2009. “Document No. 42” (42nd session of the main committee, January 18, 1949), in Der Parlamentarische Rat Vol. 14 (II), Hauptausschuss. München: Oldenbourg: 1287–1323.Google Scholar
Doemming, Klaus-Berto, Füsslein, Rudolf Werner, and Matz, Werner (eds.). 1951. Entstehungsgeschichte der Artikel des Grundgesetzes: im Auftrage der Abwicklungsstelle des Parlamentarischen Rates und des Bundesministers des Innern auf Grund der Verhandlungen des Parlamentarischen Rates. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Dreier, Horst. 1996. “Präambel.” in Dreier, Horst (ed.). Grundgesetz-Kommentar. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck: 5–32.Google Scholar
Enders, Christoph. 1997. Die Menschenwürde in der Verfassungsordnung. Zur Dogmatik des Art. 1 Abs. 1 GG. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Feldkamp, Michael F. (ed.). 1999. Die Entstehung des Grundgesetzes für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949. Eine Dokumentation. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Feldkamp, Michael F. (ed.). 2008. Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949. Die Entstehung des Grundgesetzes. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemeinsame Verfassungskommission. 1993. Bericht der Gemeinsamen Verfassungskommission. Bundestags-Drucksache. 12/6000.Google Scholar
Goos, Christoph. 2011. Innere Freiheit. Eine Rekonstruktion des grundgesetzlichen Würdebegriffs. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Guggenberger, Bernd and Stein, Tine. 1991. Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
Miller, Susanne and Potthoff, Heinrich. 2002. Kleine Geschichte der SPD. 1848–2002. Bonn: Dietz Nachdr.Google Scholar
Möllers, Christoph. 2009. Das Grundgesetz. Geschichte und Inhalt. Munich: Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Angelo O. 1997. Hermann von Mangoldt (1895–1953). Das Leben des Staatsrechtlers vom Kaiserreich bis zur Bonner Republik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schewick, Burkhard. 1980. Die Katholische Kirche und die Entstehung der Verfassungen in Westdeutschland 1945–1950. Mainz: Matthias Grünewald.Google Scholar
Sörgel, Werner. 1969. Konsensus und Interessen. Eine Studie zur Entstehung des Grundgesetzes für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett: 167–200.Google Scholar
Stein, Tine. 2007. Himmlische Quellen und irdisches Recht. Religiöse Voraussetzungen des freiheitlichen Verfassungsstaates. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Stein, Tine. 2009. “Die Verfassungsdiskussion im Jahr der deutschen Einheit,” in Conze, Eckart, Gajdukowa, Katharina, and Koch-Baumgarten, Sigrid (eds.). Die demokratische Revolution von 1989 – Politik, Geschichte, Recht. Wien: Böhlau-Verlag: 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süsterhenn, Adolf. 1991. Schriften zum Natur-, Staats- und Verfassungsrecht. Edited by Bucher, Peter. Mainz: V. Hase & Köhler.Google Scholar
Uertz, Rudolf. 2005. Vom Gottesrecht zum Menschenrecht: Das katholische Staatsdenken von der Französischen Revolution bis zum II. Vatikanischen Konzil (1789–1965). Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Uertz, Rudolf. 2008. “Adolf Süsterhenn (1905–1974),” in Buchstab, Günter and Kleinmann, Hans-Otto (eds.). Verantwortung vor Gott und den Menschen. Christliche Demokraten im Parlamentarischen Rat 1948/49. Freiburg u.a.: Herder: 355–364.Google Scholar
Vögele, Wolfgang. 1994. Zivilreligion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Vögele, Wolfgang. 2000. Menschenwürde zwischen Recht und Theologie. Begründungen von Menschenrechten in der Perspektive öffentlicher Theologie. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Werner, Wolfram. 1993. “Einleitung” in Bundestag, Deutscher and Bundesarchiv, (eds). Der Parlamentarische Rat. Akten und Protokolle, vol. 5/I: Ausschuß für Grundsatzfragen. Boppard: Boldt, xxix–xxxii.Google Scholar
Willoweit, Dietmar. 2006. “Verfassungspolitisches Denken im Vorfeld des Grundgesetzes,” in Kern, Bernd-Rüdiger, Wadle, Elmar, Schroeder, Klaus-Peter, and Katzenmeier, Christian (eds.). Humaniora. Festschrift für Adolf Laufs zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Springer, 459–478.Google Scholar