Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:21:31.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Time as Law

Common Law Thought in the Mid-Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Kunal M. Parker
Affiliation:
University of Miami School of Law
Get access

Summary

Laws Underlying Laws

The American Civil War is rightly considered a watershed in American history. More than three decades ago, Morton Keller described this watershed in ways that continue to resonate: “On its far side is the young Republic: agrarian, decentralized, living still under the spell of the Revolution and the Founding Fathers, burdened by slavery but exhilarated by the lure of the great undeveloped West. And on its near side is modern America: a nation of cities, factories, immigrants; a society whose controlling realities are not simplicity and underdevelopment but complexity and maturity.”

Americans who lived through the Civil War themselves wrote – and how could they not? – as if they had experienced something transformative. Although they did not represent the experience, as Keller did, in terms of an accession to “modernity,” they prefigured Keller's observation that the country had lost its youthful innocence and been catapulted into an adulthood marked by complexity and compromise. In The American Republic (1865), the Roman Catholic social and political thinker Orestes Brownson wrote that the War had brought the country “to a distinct recognition of itself, and forced it to pass from thoughtlessness, careless, heedless, reckless adolescence to a grave and reflecting manhood.” Fourteen years after Appomattox, Henry James struck a similar note. Observing that the Civil War had brought America's naive sense of “its immunity from the usual troubles of earthly empires” to an end, James found that Americans had acquired “a certain sense of proportion and relation, of the world being a more complicated place than it had hitherto seemed, the future more treacherous, success more difficult.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900
Legal Thought before Modernism
, pp. 168 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keller, Morton, Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1977), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownson, Orestes A., The American Republic: Its Constitution, Tendencies and Destiny (Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books, 2003) (1865), pp. 4, 1–2Google Scholar
James, Henry, Hawthorne (New York: Harper & Bros., 1901) (1879), pp. 139, 137, 139–140Google Scholar
Wernick, Andrew, Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity: The Post-Theistic Program of French Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 6, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, L. L. and Bernard, Jessie, Origins of American Sociology: The Social Science Movement in the United States (New York: Russell & Russell, Inc., 1965), Part 4, Chaps. 27–32Google Scholar
Green, Arnold W., Henry Charles Carey, Nineteenth Century Sociologist (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1951)Google Scholar
Wiecek, William M., The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, 1760–1848 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977), p. 32Google Scholar
Cushing, John D., “The Cushing Court and the Abolition of Slavery in Massachusetts: More Notes on the ‘Quock Walker Case,’” American Journal of Legal History 5 (1961): 118–144, quoted in Wiecek, Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, p. 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Salmon P. and Cleveland, Dexter, Anti-Slavery Addresses of 1844 and 1845 (Philadelphia: J. A. Bancroft & Co., 1867)Google Scholar
Schuster, Eunice M., Native American Anarchism: A Study of Left-Wing American Individualism (Northampton, Mass.: Smith College, Department of History, 1932)Google Scholar
Alexander, Brown. A. John, “The Ideas of Lysander Spooner,” New England Quarterly 23 (1950): 200–217, at 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Lewis, Radical Abolitionism: Anarchy and the Government of God in Antislavery Thought (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1995) (1973), pp. 204–208Google Scholar
Mellen, G. W. F., An Argument on the Unconstitutionality of Slavery, Embracing an Abstract of the Proceedings of the National and State Conventions on this Subject (Boston: Saxton & Pierce, 1841)Google Scholar
Goodell, William, Views of American Constitutional Law, in its Bearing upon American Slavery (Utica, N.Y.: Lawson & Chaplin, 1845)Google Scholar
Spooner, Lysander, The Unconstitutionality of Slavery (Boston: Bella Marsh, 1860)Google Scholar
Phillips, Wendell, Review of Lysander Spooner's Essay on the Unconstitutionality of Slavery (Boston: Andrews & Prentiss, 1847)Google Scholar
Spooner, Lysander, An Essay on the Trial by Jury (New York: Da Capo Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Cobb, Thomas R. R., An Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery in the United States of America. To which is Prefixed, an Historical Sketch of Study (Philadelphia: T. & J. W. Johnson & Co and Savannah: W. Thorne Williams, 1858)Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1955)Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann, “George Fitzhugh, Sui Generis,” in George Fitzhugh, Cannibals All! Or Slaves Without Masters (C. Vann Woodward, ed.) (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1960) (1857)Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene D., The World the Slaveholders Made: Two Essays in Interpretation (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Jenkins, William Sumner, Pro-Slavery Thought in the Old South (Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1960)Google Scholar
Faust, Drew Gilpin, A Sacred Circle: The Dilemma of the Intellectual in the Old South, 1840–1860 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
O'Brien, Michael, Conjectures of Order: Intellectual Life and the American South, 1810–1860 (2 vols.) (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Genovese, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese and Eugene, The Mind of the Master Class: History and Faith in the Southern Slaveholders' Worldview (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, “Frederick the Great, by Thomas Carlyle,” De Bow's Review 29 (1860): 151–167, at 152Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, Sociology for the South: or, the Failure of Free Society (New York: Burt Franklin, 1965) (1854), pp. 10–11Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, “The Counter Current, or Slavery Principle,” De Bow's Review 21 (July 1856): 90–95, at 93Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, “Small Nations,” De Bow's Review 29 (1860): 561–569, at 568Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, “The Message, the Constitution, and the Times,” De Bow's Review 30 (1861): 156–167, at 157Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, George, “The Declaration of Independence and the Republican Party,” De Bow's Review 29 (1860): 175–187, at 180Google Scholar
Parker, Joel, The Domestic and Foreign Relations of the United States (Cambridge: Welch, Bigelow & Co., 1862), p. 80Google Scholar
Paludan, Phillip S., A Covenant with Death: The Constitution, Law, and Equality in the Civil War Era (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Perry, Thomas Sergeant, ed., The Life and Letters of Francis Lieber (Boston: James R. Osgood & Co., 1882), p. 340Google Scholar
Fisher, Sidney George, The Trial of the Constitution (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1862), pp. v–viGoogle Scholar
Norton, Charles Eliot, “American Political Ideas,” North American Review 101 (1865): 559Google Scholar
Kaczorowski, Robert J., “Revolutionary Constitutionalism in the Era of the Civil War and Reconstruction,” New York University Law Review 61 (1986): 863–940Google Scholar
Draper, John W., Thoughts on the Future Civil Policy of America (New York: Harper & Bros., 1865), p. 252Google Scholar
Story, Joseph, Commentaries on the Constitution (2 vols.), Thomas M. Cooley, ed. (Boston: Little-Brown, 1873) Vol. 1, p. 193Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M., A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1868), p. 189Google Scholar
Newcomb, Simon, “Abstract Science in America, 1776–1876,” North American Review 122 (1876): 88–123, at 122Google Scholar
Godkin, E. L., “The Prospects of the Political Art,” North American Review 110 (1870): 388–419, at 417Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M., A Treatise on the Law of Torts or the Wrongs Which Arise Independent of Contract (Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1870), pp. 12–13Google Scholar
Bishop, Charles S., “Joel Prentiss Bishop, LL.D.,” American Law Review 36 (1902): 1–9Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., “Law in the United States,” American Law Register 3 (1854–1855): 60–61, at 60Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., “Legal Principles: No. V,” American Law Register 3 (1854–1855): 381–384, at 383Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., Commentaries on the Law of Marriage and Divorce, with the Evidence, Practice, Pleading, and Forms: Also of Separations without Divorce, and of the Evidence of Marriage in All Issues (6th ed.) (2 vols.) (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1881), Vol. 1, p. xviGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., “Law in the United States,” American Law Register 3 60, 61 (1854–1855): 60–61, at 61Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., Secession and Slavery: or the Constitutional Duty of Congress to give the Elective Franchise and Freedom to all Loyal Persons, in Response to the Act of Secession (Boston: A. Williams, 1866), p. 40Google Scholar
Bishop, Joel P., First Book of the Law: Explaining the Nature, Sources, Books, and Practical Applications of Legal Science, and Methods of Study and Practice (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1868), p. 67Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Time as Law
  • Kunal M. Parker
  • Book: Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973963.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Time as Law
  • Kunal M. Parker
  • Book: Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973963.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Time as Law
  • Kunal M. Parker
  • Book: Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973963.005
Available formats
×