Introduction

Kunal M. Parker

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511973963.001

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2011

Kunal M. Parker

Show author details

Kunal M. Parker: Affiliation:
University of Miami School of Law

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Common Law, Democracy, History: a Modernist Tradition of Reading the Past

From the American Revolution until the very end of the nineteenth century, the common law was considered an integral mode of governance and public discourse in America. The vital presence of the common law might seem odd in a country that was premised in so many ways on breaking with its European past and on assuming political control of its own destiny. After all, the common law had originated in, and remained closely identified with, England. It was ideologically committed to upholding precedent and to repeating the past, claiming as it did so to embody the “immemorial” customs of the English, customs so old that their origin lay beyond “the memory of man.” It consisted of judicial, rather than legislative, articulation of legal principles. For all these reasons, one might expect Americans, who were intensely proud of their republican experiment, to have rejected the common law.

Instead, until the very end of the nineteenth century, the common law was widely – although never universally – claimed and celebrated. In 1826, in the first volume of his celebrated Commentaries on American Law, the “American Blackstone,” James Kent, delivered the following breathless paean to the common law that captures how many nineteenth-century American lawyers thought about it:

[The common law] fills up every interstice, and occupies every wide space which the statute law cannot occupy…. […]

Type: Chapter
Information: Common Law, History, and Democracy in America, 1790–1900
Legal Thought before Modernism
, pp. 1 - 24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973963.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kent, James, Commentaries on American Law (4 vols.) (New York: E. B. Clayton, 1840) (4th ed.; 1st ed., 1826), Vol. 1, p. 343

Gordon, Robert W., “Critical Legal Histories,” Stanford Law Review 36 (1984): 57–125Google Scholar

Reid, John Phillip, The Ancient Constitution and the Origins of Anglo-American Liberty (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2005)

Reid, John Phillip, The Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Rights (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986); The Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority to Tax (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987); The Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of to Legislate (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991); The Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993)

Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977)

Luban, David, Legal Modernism (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994)

Ross, Dorothy, “Modernism Reconsidered,” in Dorothy Ross, ed., Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870–1930 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)

Gay, Peter, Modernism: The Lure of Heresy from Baudelaire to Beckett and Beyond (New York: Norton, 2008), pp. 1, 3–4

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr., The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1881)

Roberts, David D., Nothing but History: Reconstruction and Extremity after Metaphysics (Aurora, Colo.: Davies Group, 2006) (1995)

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr., “The Path of the Law” (1897), in The Collected Works of Justice Holmes: Complete Public Writings and Selected Judicial Opinions of Oliver Wendell Holmes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995) (5 vols.) (Sheldon Novick, ed.) (hereafter “Collected Works”), Vol. 3, p. 399

Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 142

White, G. Morton, Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism (New York: Viking Press, 1949)

Kloppenberg, James T., Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)

Beard, Charles A., An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York: MacMillan, 1935) (1913), p. 9

Dewey, John, in My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American Scholars (Boston: Boston Law Book, 1941), p. 83

Nelson, William, Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975)

Wiecek, William M., The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought: Law and Ideology in America, 1886–1937 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)

Tomlins, Christopher, Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)

Forbath, William E., Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991)

Hartog, Hendrik, Man and Wife in America: A History (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000)

Morris, Thomas D., Southern Slavery and the Law, 1619–1860 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996)

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000)

Ross, Richard J., “Puritan Godly Discipline in Comparative Perspective: Legal Pluralism and the Sources of ‘Intensity,’” American Historical Review 113 (October 2008): 975–1002Google Scholar

Haskins, George L., Law and Authority in Early Massachusetts: A Study in Tradition and Design (New York: Macmillan, 1960)

Novak, William J., The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth Century America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996)

Carlyle, Thomas, “The Present Time,” Latter-Day Pamphlets (New York: Scribner's, 1901) (1850), pp. 19–21

Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975)

Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

Parker, Kunal M., “Context in Law and History: A Study of the Late Nineteenth Century American Jurisprudence of Custom,” Law and History Review 24 (2006): 473–518Google Scholar

Miller, Perry, The Life of the Mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965)

Rabban, David, “The Historiography of Late Nineteenth-Century American Legal History,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4 (July 2003): 541–578Google Scholar

Siegel, Stephen A., “Historism in Late Nineteenth Century Constitutional Thought,” Wisconsin Law Review (1990): 1431–1547Google Scholar

Wilf, Steven, “The Invention of Legal Primitivism,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10 (2009): 485–509Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl, Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949), p. viii

Book contents

1 - Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive