Book contents
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Plain Radiography
- Part II Ultrasound
- Part III Computed Tomography
- Chapter 28 CT in the ED: Special Considerations
- Chapter 29 CT of the Spine
- Chapter 30 CT Imaging of the Head
- Chapter 31 CT Imaging of the Face
- Chapter 32 CT of the Chest
- Chapter 33 CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- Chapter 34 CT Angiography of the Chest
- Chapter 35 CT Angiography of the Abdominal Vasculature
- Chapter 36 CT Angiography of the Head and Neck
- Chapter 37 CT Angiography of the Extremities
- Part IV Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Index
- References
Chapter 28 - CT in the ED: Special Considerations
from Part III - Computed Tomography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Clinical Emergency Radiology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Plain Radiography
- Part II Ultrasound
- Part III Computed Tomography
- Chapter 28 CT in the ED: Special Considerations
- Chapter 29 CT of the Spine
- Chapter 30 CT Imaging of the Head
- Chapter 31 CT Imaging of the Face
- Chapter 32 CT of the Chest
- Chapter 33 CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- Chapter 34 CT Angiography of the Chest
- Chapter 35 CT Angiography of the Abdominal Vasculature
- Chapter 36 CT Angiography of the Head and Neck
- Chapter 37 CT Angiography of the Extremities
- Part IV Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 401 - 406Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Crownover, BK, Bepko, JL: Appropriate and safe use of diagnostic imaging. Am Fam Physician 2013;87(7):494–501.Google Scholar
Tublin, ME, Murphy, ME, Tessler, FN: Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(4):933–9.Google Scholar
Pannu, N, Wiebe, N, Tonelli, M: Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA 2006;295(23):2765–79.Google Scholar
Gruberg, L, Mehran, R, Dangas, G, et al.: Acute renal failure requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv 2001;52(4):409–16.Google Scholar
McCullough, PA, Wolyn, R, Rocher, LL, et al.: Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997;103(5):368–75.Google Scholar
Hoste, EAJ, Doom, S, De Waele, J, et al.: Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Intensive Care Med 2011;37(12):1921–31.Google Scholar
Morcos, SK, Thomsen, HS, Webb, JA: Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol 1999;9(8):1602–13.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, JA, Lundby, B, Kristoffersen, DT, et al.: Evaluation of renal function with delayed CT after injection of nonionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media in healthy volunteers. Radiology 1992;182(2):419–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, ST, Wong, WS, Roe, DJ: Predicting angiography-induced acute renal function impairment: clinical risk model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141(5):1027–33.Google Scholar
De Freitas do Carmo, LP, Macedo, E: Contrast-induced nephropathy: attributable incidence and potential harm. Crit Care Lond Engl 2012;16(3):127.Google Scholar
Gleeson, TG, Bulugahapitiya, S: Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(6):1673–89.Google Scholar
Mitchell, AM, Jones, AE, Tumlin, JA, Kline, JA: Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5(1):4–9.Google Scholar
Parfrey, PS, Griffiths, SM, Barrett, BJ, et al.: Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 1989;320(3):143–9.Google Scholar
Rudnick, MR, Goldfarb, S, Wexler, L, et al.: Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study. Kidney Int 1995;47(1):254–61.Google Scholar
Traub, SJ, Kellum, JA, Tang, A, et al.: Risk factors for radiocontrast nephropathy after emergency department contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(1):40–5.Google Scholar
Atwell, TD, Lteif, AN, Brown, DL, et al.: Neonatal thyroid function after administration of IV iodinated contrast agent to 21 pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(1):268–71.Google Scholar
Webb, JAW, Thomsen, HS, Morcos, SK: Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005;15(6):1234–40.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology: Manual on contrast media, version 10. 2015. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/37D84428BF1D4E1B9A3A2918DA9E27A3.pdfGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice: ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(3):647–51.Google Scholar
Bettmann, MA: Frequently asked questions: iodinated contrast agents. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 2004;24 Suppl 1:S3–10.Google Scholar
McCarthy, CS, Becker, JA: Multiple myeloma and contrast media. Radiology 1992;183(2):519–21.Google Scholar
Pahade, JK, LeBedis, CA, Raptopoulos, VD, et al.: Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(5):1094–101.Google Scholar
Bailey, CJ, Wilcock, C, Day, C: Effect of metformin on glucose metabolism in the splanchnic bed. Br J Pharmacol 1992;105(4):1009–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirtori, CR, Pasik, C: Re-evaluation of a biguanide, metformin: mechanism of action and tolerability. Pharmacol Res Off J Ital Pharmacol Soc 1994;30(3):187–228.Google Scholar
Barrett, BJ, Carlisle, EJ: Metaanalysis of the relative nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality iodinated contrast media. Radiology 1993;188(1):171–8.Google Scholar
Briguori, C, Airoldi, F, D’Andrea, D, et al.: Renal insufficiency following contrast media administration trial (REMEDIAL): a randomized comparison of 3 preventive strategies. Circulation 2007;115(10):1211–7.Google Scholar
Ludwig, U, Riedel, MK, Backes, M, et al.: MESNA (sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) for prevention of contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity – controlled trial. Clin Nephrol 2011;75(4):302–8.Google Scholar
Ellis, JH, Cohan, RH: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: an overview. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47(5):801–11.Google Scholar
Trivedi, HS, Moore, H, Nasr, S, et al.: A randomized prospective trial to assess the role of saline hydration on the development of contrast nephrotoxicity. Nephron Clin Pract 2003;93(1):C29–34.Google Scholar
From, AM, Bartholmai, BJ, Williams, AW, et al.: Sodium bicarbonate is associated with an increased incidence of contrast nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study of 7977 patients at Mayo Clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(1):10–8.Google Scholar
Gomes, VO, Lasevitch, R, Lima, VC, et al.: Hydration with sodium bicarbonate does not prevent contrast nephropathy: a multicenter clinical trial. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;99(6):1129–34.Google Scholar
Merten, GJ, Burgess, WP, Gray, LV, et al.: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291(19):2328–34.Google Scholar
Adolph, E, Holdt-Lehmann, B, Chatterjee, T, et al.: Renal insufficiency following radiocontrast exposure trial (REINFORCE): a randomized comparison of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19(6):413–9.Google Scholar
Mueller, C, Buerkle, G, Buettner, HJ, et al.: Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(3):329–36.Google Scholar
Weisbord, SD, Palevsky, PM: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with volume expansion. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3(1):273–80.Google Scholar
Stacul, F, van der Molen, AJ, Reimer, P, et al.: Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 2011;21(12):2527–41.Google Scholar
Tepel, M, van der Giet, M, Schwarzfeld, C, et al.: Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000;343(3):180–4.Google Scholar
Bagshaw, SM, Ghali, WA: Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after intravascular angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2004;2:38.Google Scholar
Traub, SJ, Mitchell, AM, Jones, AE, et al.: N-acetylcysteine plus intravenous fluids versus intravenous fluids alone to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in emergency computed tomography. Ann Emerg Med 2013;62(5):511–520.e25.Google Scholar
Cruz, DN, Perazella, MA, Ronco, C: The role of extracorporeal blood purification therapies in the prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Int J Artif Organs 2008;31(6):515–24.Google Scholar
Cruz, DN, Goh, CY, Marenzi, G, et al.: Renal replacement therapies for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review. Am J Med 2012;125(1):66–78.e3.Google Scholar
Morcos, SK, Thomsen, HS, Webb, JA: Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol 2001;11(9):1720–8.Google Scholar
Dewachter, P, Laroche, D, Mouton-Faivre, C, et al.: Immediate reactions following iodinated contrast media injection: a study of 38 cases. Eur J Radiol 2011;77(3):495–501.Google Scholar
Brockow, K: Immediate and delayed reactions to radiocontrast media: is there an allergic mechanism? Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2009;29(3):453–68.Google Scholar
Caro, JJ, Trindade, E, McGregor, M: The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(4):825–32.Google Scholar
Katayama, H, Yamaguchi, K, Kozuka, T, et al.: Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175(3):621–8.Google Scholar
Nguyen, CP, Goodman, LH: Fetal risk in diagnostic radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012;33(1):4–10.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Stein, SA, Liu, B, Hahn, PF, Lee, SI: Radiation dose management: part 2, estimating fetal radiation risk from CT during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(4):W352–6.Google Scholar
Masselli, G, Derchi, L, McHugo, J, et al.: Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations. Eur Radiol 2013;23(12):3485–500.Google Scholar
Sadro, C, Bernstein, MP, Kanal, KM: Imaging of trauma: part 2, abdominal trauma and pregnancy–a radiologist’s guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(6):1207–19.Google Scholar
Miglioretti, DL, Johnson, E, Williams, A, et al.: The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167(8):700–7.Google Scholar
Journy, N, Ancelet, S, Rehel, J-L, et al.: Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach. Radiat Environ Biophys 2014;53(1):39–54.Google Scholar
Lyttle, MD, Crowe, L, Oakley, E, et al.: Comparing CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN clinical decision rules for paediatric head injuries. Emerg Med J 2012;29(10):785–94.Google Scholar
Kuppermann, N, Holmes, JF, Dayan, PS, et al.: Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374(9696):1160–70.Google Scholar
Garcia, M, Taylor, G, Babcock, L, et al.: Computed tomography with intravenous contrast alone: the role of intra-abdominal fat on the ability to visualize the normal appendix in children. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(8):795–800.Google Scholar
Morton, RP, Reynolds, RM, Ramakrishna, R, et al.: Low-dose head computed tomography in children: a single institutional experience in pediatric radiation risk reduction: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013;12(4):406–10.Google Scholar