Book contents
- Clinical Airway ManagementAn Illustrated Case-Based Approach
- Clinical Airway Management
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Introduction
- Section 2 Basic Airway Management
- 7 Airway Management for Procedural Sedation
- 8 Airway Management for Very Brief Procedures
- 9 Outpatient Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway
- 10 Tracheal Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy
- 11 Video Laryngoscopy: Using the GlideScope
- Section 3 The Anticipated Difficult Airway
- Section 4 The Unanticipated Difficult Airway
- Section 5 Lower Airway Management
- Section 6 Airway Emergencies and Special Situations
- Section 7 When the Airway Goes Bad
- Appendix: The Art and Science of Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
- Index
- References
9 - Outpatient Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway
from Section 2 - Basic Airway Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2017
Book contents
- Clinical Airway ManagementAn Illustrated Case-Based Approach
- Clinical Airway Management
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Introduction
- Section 2 Basic Airway Management
- 7 Airway Management for Procedural Sedation
- 8 Airway Management for Very Brief Procedures
- 9 Outpatient Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway
- 10 Tracheal Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy
- 11 Video Laryngoscopy: Using the GlideScope
- Section 3 The Anticipated Difficult Airway
- Section 4 The Unanticipated Difficult Airway
- Section 5 Lower Airway Management
- Section 6 Airway Emergencies and Special Situations
- Section 7 When the Airway Goes Bad
- Appendix: The Art and Science of Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Airway ManagementAn Illustrated Case-Based Approach, pp. 48 - 53Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
References
Brimacombe, J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or face mask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 1017–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, TM, Woodall, N, Frerk, C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617–31.Google Scholar
Cook, T, Howes, B. Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances. BJA CEACCP 2011; 11: 57–61.Google Scholar
Pandit, JJ, Popat, MT, Cook, TM, et al. The Difficult Airway Society ‘ADEPT’ guidance on selecting airway devices: the basis of a strategy for equipment evaluation. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 726–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TM, Lee, G, Nolan, JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 739–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Brimacombe, J, Keller, C, Judd, DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X, Jiao, J, Cong, X, Liu, L, Wu, X. A comparison of the performance of the i-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™ during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verghese, C, Brimacombe, JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129–33.Google Scholar
Cook, TM, Gibbison, B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 436–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, TM, Gatward, JJ, Handel, J, et al. The evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theiler, L, Gutzmann, M, Kleine-Brueggeney, M, Urwyler, N, Kaempfen, B, Greif, R. i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 990–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brimacombe, J. Placement phase. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders; pp. 191–240.Google Scholar
Brimacombe, J. Problems. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders; pp. 551–76.Google Scholar
Brimacombe, J. Resuscitation. In Laryngeal Mask Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition, 2005. London: Saunders: pp. 281–96.Google Scholar
Hohlrieder, M, Brimacombe, J, von Goedecke, A, Keller, C. Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 458–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, BW, Wharton, NM, Gibbison, B, Cook, TM. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2010: 65; 343–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, NM, Gibbison, B, Gabbott, D, Haslam, GM, Cook, TM. i-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 991–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatward, JJ, Cook, TM, Seller, C, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scanlon, P, Carey, M, Power, M, Kirby, F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 816–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyagi, T, Tanaka, M, Nishikawa, T. Fentanyl decreases propofol requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 771–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baik, HJ, Kim, YJ, Kim, JH. Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 377–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodaka, M, Handa, F, Kawasaki, J, Miyao, H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 956–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drage, MP, Nunez, J, Vaughan, RS, Asai, T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1167–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, C, Sparr, HJ, Brimacombe, JR. Positive pressure ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway in non-paralysed patients: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol maintenance techniques. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 332–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, TM, Kelly, FE. Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ LMA and adopt 2nd-generation SADs as 1st choice. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 497–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar