Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:17:44.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Long-term fluctuations in atmospheric CO2 concentration influence plant speciation rates

from Section 2 - Adaptation, speciation and extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

J. C. McElwain
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Ireland
K. J. Willis
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
K. J. Niklas
Affiliation:
Cornell University, NY, USA
Trevor R. Hodkinson
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Michael B. Jones
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Stephen Waldren
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
John A. N. Parnell
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The influence of vascular land-plant evolution on long-term fluctuations in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has been much discussed. However, the direct evolutionary consequences of changes in past atmospheric CO2 concentration have not been widely explored despite experimental evidence showing that elevated CO2 can intensify interplant competition, alter plant reproductive biology, and thus potentially influence plant speciation. In this chapter, we put forward the hypothesis that changes in atmospheric CO2 may have directly enhanced vascular plant speciation rates in the course of land-plant evolution, particularly in the late Palaeozoic when numerous pteridophyte and gymnosperm lineages were radiating rapidly (between approximately 400 and 240 million years ago – mya). Our hypothesis is based on the observation of significant correlations between land-plant speciation rates and long-term records on fluctuations in atmospheric CO2 levels over the past 410 million years. The relationship is complex, however, with a strong positive correlation between gymnosperm and pteridophyte speciation rates and CO2 concentration above 1000 ppmv, but a weak negative correlation between angiosperm speciation rates and atmospheric CO2 levels. These results suggest that fundamental plant evolutionary responses to atmospheric CO2 may be dependent on evolutionary grade. Model estimates of palaeo-atmospheric CO2 values are subject to considerable uncertainties, as are large-scale literature compilations of fossil plant speciation rates through geological time. Future collections of plant speciation data and palaeo-CO2 estimates are therefore required to test this hypothesis further.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algeo, T. J. and Scheckler, S. E. (1998). Terrestrial–marine teleconnections in the Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and marine anoxic events. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, P. M. and Willis, K. J. (2001). Did dinosaurs invent flowers? Dinosaur–angiosperm coevolution revisited. Biological Reviews, 76, 411–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazzaz, F. A., Jasienski, M., Thomas, S. C. and Wayne, P. (1995). Microevolutionary responses in experimental populations of plants to CO2-enriched environments: parallel results from 2 model systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 92, 8161–8165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerling, D. J., Osborne, C. P. and Chaloner, W. G. (2001). Evolution of leaf-form in land plants linked to atmospheric CO2 decline in the Late Palaeozoic era. Nature, 410, 352–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berner, R. A. (1991). A model for atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time. American Journal of Science, 291, 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, R. A. (1997). The rise of plants and their effect on weathering and atmospheric CO2. Science, 276, 544–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, R. A. (2006). GEOCARBSULF: a combined model for Phanerozoic atmospheric O2 and CO2. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70, 5653–5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, R. A. and Canfield, D. E. (1989). A new model for atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time. American Journal of Science, 289, 333–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berner, R. A. and Kothavala, Z. (2001). GEOCARB III: a revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time. American Journal of Science, 301, 182–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, C. K., Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S. and Zwieniecki, M. A. (2009). Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276, 1771–1776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerling, T. E. (1991). Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: evidence from Cenozoic and Mesozoic paleosols. American Journal of Science, 291, 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christin, P. A., Besnard, G., Samaritani, E. et al. (2008). Oligocene CO2 decline promoted C-4 photosynthesis in grasses. Current Biology, 18, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornette, J. L., Lieberman, B. S. and Goldstein, R. H. (2002). Documenting a significant relationship between macroevolutionary origination rates and Phanerozoic pCO2 levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 7832–7835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowling, S. A. (2001). Plant carbon balance, evolutionary innovation and extinction in land plants. Global Change Biology, 7, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepet, W. L. and Niklas, K. J. (2009). Darwin's second abominable mystery: why are there so many angiosperms?American Journal of Botany, 96, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, P. S. and Wang, X. (1998). A meta analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form and physiology. Oecologia, 113, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLucia, E. H., Hamilton, J. G., Naidu, S. L. et al. (1999). Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment. Science, 284, 1177–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMichele, W. A. and Phillips, T. L. (1996). Climate change, plant extinctions, and vegetation recovery during the middle–late Pennsylvanian transition: the case of tropical peat-forming environments in North America. In Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction, ed. Hart, M. L.. London: Geological Society of London, pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
Dimichele, W. A., Montanez, I. P., Poulsen, C. J. and Tabor, N. J. (2009). Climate and vegetational regime shifts in the late Paleozoic ice age earth. Geobiology, 7, 200–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehleringer, J. R., Sage, R. F., Flanagan, L. B. and Pearcy, R. W. (1991). Climate change and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B. J., Beerling, D. J., Brentnall, S. J. and Royer, D. L. (2005). Fossil bryophyte as recorders of ancient CO2 levels: experimental evidence and a Cretaceous case study. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B. J., Brentnall, S. J., Quick, W. P. and Beerling, D. J. (2006). BRYOCARB: a process-based model of thallose liverwort carbon isotope fractionation in response to CO2, O2, light and temperature. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70, 5676–5691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, P. J. and Beerling, D. J. (2009). CO2-forced evolution of plant gas exchange capacity and water-use efficiency over the Phanerozoic. Geobiology, 7, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1985). The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology, 11, 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huh, Y. and Edmond, J. M. (1999). The fluvial geochemistry of the rivers of Eastern Siberia: III. Tributaries of the Lena and Anabar draining the basement terrain of the Siberian Craton and the Trans-Baikal Highlands. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 967–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, M., Kubiske, M. E. and Connor, K. F. (2001). Germination of CO2-enriched Pinus taeda L. seeds and subsequent seedling growth responses to CO2 enrichment. Journal of Functional Ecology, 15, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D. (2001). Micro and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Palaeobiology, 26, 15–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M. J. and Mora, G. (2006). Cenozoic plant diversity in the Neotropics. Science, 311, 1893–1896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoll, A. H. (1985). Patterns of evolution in the Archean and Proterozoic eons. Palaeobiology, 11, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korner, C. (2006). Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytologist, 172, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, J. A., Peiffer, J., Reich, P. B. and Tiffin, P. (2008). Transgenerational effects of global environmental change: long-term CO2 and nitrogen treatments influence offspring growth response to elevated CO2. Oecologia, 158, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidgard, S. and Crane, P. R. (1988). Quantitative analyses of the early angiosperm radiation. Nature, 331, 344–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidgard, S. and Crane, P. R. (1990). Angiosperm diversification and Cretaceous florisitic trends: a comparison of palynofloras and leaf macrofloras. Paleobiology, 16, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looy, C. V., Twitchett, R. J., Dilcher, D. L., Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J. H. A. and Visscher, H. (2001). Life in the end-Permian dead zone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98, 7879–7883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupia, R., Lidgard, S. and Crane, P. R. (1999). Comparing palynological abundance and diversity: implications for biotic replacement during the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation. Paleobiology, 25, 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, J. C. and Chaloner, W. G. (1995). Stomatal density and index of fossil plants track atmospheric carbon-dioxide in the Paleozoic. Annals of Botany, 76, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, J. C. and Punyasena, S. (2007). Mass extinction events and the plant fossil record. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 548–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElwain, J. C., Beerling, D. J. and Woodward, F. I. (1999). Fossil plants and global warming at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Science, 285, 1386–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElwain, J. C., Willis, K. J. and Lupia, R. (2005). Cretaceous CO2 decline and the radiation and diversification of angiosperms. In A History of Atmospheric CO2 and its Effects on Plants, Animals and Ecosystems, ed. Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E. and Dearind, M. D.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
McElwain, J. C., Wagner, P. J. and Hesselbo, S. P. (2009). Fossil plant relative abundances indicate sudden loss of Late Triassic biodiversity in East Greenland. Science, 324, 1554–1556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moulton, K. L. and Berner, R. A. (1998). Quantification of the effect of plants on weathering: studies in Iceland. Geology, 26, 895–898.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, K. L., West, J. and Berner, R. A. (2000). Solute flux and mineral mass balance approaches to the quantification of plant effects on silicate weathering. American Journal of Science, 300, 539–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklas, K. J. (1997). The Evolutionary Biology of Plants. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. and Enquist, B. J. (2001). Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98, 2922–2927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niklas, K. J., Tiffney, B. H. and Knoll, A. H. (1983). Patterns in vascular land plant diversification. Nature, 303, 614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklas, K. J., Tiffney, B. H. and Knoll, A. H. (1985). Patterns in vascular land plant diversification: an analysis at the species level. In Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns: Profiles in Macroevolution, ed. Valentine, J. W.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, University Press, pp. 97–128.Google Scholar
Pagani, M., Arthur, M. A. and Freeman, K. H. (1999). Miocene evolution of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Paleoceanography, 14, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. N. and Palmer, M. R. (2000). Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature, 406, 695–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, O. L. and Gentry, A. H. (1994). Increasing turnover through time in tropical forests. Science, 263, 954–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poorter, H. and Navas, M. L. (2003). Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist, 157, 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachmilevitch, S., Cousins, A. B. and Bloom, A. J. (2004). Nitrate assimilation in plant shoots depends on photorespiration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 11506–11510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. M. (1994). Speculations on carbon-dioxide starvation, Late Tertiary evolution of stomatal regulation and floristic modernization. Plant Cell and Environment, 17, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royer, D. L. (2001). Stomatal density and stomatal index as indicators of paleoatmospheric CO2 concentration. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 114, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royer, D. L., Berner, R. A. and Beerling, D. J. (2001). Phanerozoic atmospheric CO2 change: evaluating geochemical and paleobiological approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 54, 349–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royer, D. L., Berner, R. A., Montanez, I. P., Tabor, N. J. and Beerling, D. J. (2004). CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today, 14, 4–10.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, S. L. and Lindquist, S. (1998). Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature, 396, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sage, R. F. (2004). The evolution of C-4 photosynthesis. New Phytologist, 161, 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajika, E. (1999). Carbon cycle and climate change during the Cretaceous inferred from a biogeochemical carbon cycle model. The Island Arc, 8, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. L., Leake, J. R., Quirk, J. et al. (2009). Biological weathering and the long-term carbon cycle: integrating mycorrhizal evolution and function into the current paradigm. Geobiology, 7, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traverse, A. (1988). Plant evolution dances to a different beat: plant and evolutionary mechanisms compared. Historical Biology, 1, 277–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vajda, V., Raine, J. I. and Hollis, C. J. (2001). Indication of global deforestation at the Creataceous–Tertiary boundary by New Zealand fern spike. Science, 294, 1700–1702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, J. K. and Kelly, J. K. (2004). Scaling up evolutionary responses to elevated CO2: lessons from Arabidopsis. Ecology Letters, 7, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. K., Antonovics, J., Thomas, R. B. and Strain, B. R. (2000). Is atmospheric CO2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals?Oecologia, 123, 330–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, K. J. and Bennett, K. D. (1995 ). Mass extinction, punctuated equilibrium and the fossil plant record. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 308–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, K. J. and McElwain, J. C. (2002). The Evolution of Plants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, K. J., Bennett, K. D. and Birks, H. J. B. (2009). Variability in thermal and UV-B energy fluxes through time and their influence on plant diversity and speciation. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1630–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, S. L. (2004). Mass extinctions in plant evolution. In Extinctions in the History of Life, ed. Taylor, P. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–97.Google Scholar
Wing, S. L., Harrington, G. J., Smith, F. A. et al. (2005). Transient floral change and rapid global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Science, 310, 993–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, F. I. (1987). Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increase in CO2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature, 327, 617–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×