Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:44:04.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2022

Michèle Lowrie  and
Barbara Vinken
Michèle Lowrie
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Barbara Vinken
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Civil War and the Collapse of the Social Bond
The Roman Tradition at the Heart of the Modern
 , pp. 326 - 355
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ahl, F. (ed. and trans.) (2007). Virgil: Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Albouy, P. (ed.) (1964). Victor Hugo: Oeuvres poétiques i. Avant l’exil 1802–1851. Paris.Google Scholar
Albouy, P. (1967). Victor Hugo: Oeuvres poétiques ii. Les châtiments, les contemplations. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnaud-Lindet, M.-P. (ed.) (1990). Orose: Histoires (contre les païens). Paris.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1964). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1971). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. (1977). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber sextus: With a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boudout, J. (ed.) (1957). Victor Hugo: Quatrevingt-treize. Paris.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (ed.) (1978). Tocqueville: Souvenirs. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruneau, J. (ed.) (1991). Flaubert: Correspondance, vol. iii. Paris.Google Scholar
Cambien, M. (ed.) (1972). Victor Hugo: La preface de “Cromwell.” Paris.Google Scholar
Camus, R. (2011). Le grand remplacement. Plieux.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (ed.) (1994). Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cocteau, J. (1950). “Le mystère laïc,” in Oeuvres complètes, vol. 10. Lausanne, 9–46.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. E. (ed.) (2009). Res gestae divi Augusti. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daoud, K. (2013). Meursault, contre-enquête. Arles.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (1800). “Les bijoux indiscrèts,” in Oeuvres de Denis Diderot, vol. 10. Paris.Google Scholar
Dyson, R. W. (ed.) (1998). Augustine: The City of God against the Pagans. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). “Theatrum Philosophicum,” in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. and ed. Bouchard, D. F. and Simon, S.. Ithaca, 165–96.Google Scholar
Gide, A. (2002). Hugo, hélas! Saint-Clément-de-Rivière.Google Scholar
Giono, J. (1982). L’homme qui plantait des arbres. Paris.Google Scholar
Giono, J (2001). Virgile ou les palais de l’Atlantide. Paris.Google Scholar
Gohin, Y. (ed.) (1979). Victor Hugo: Quatrevingt-treize. Paris.Google Scholar
Gransden, K. W. (ed.) (1976). Virgil: “Aeneid” Book viii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (ed.) (2019). Ovid, Fasti, Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (ed.) (2013). Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Houellebecq, M. (2015a). Soumission. Paris.Google Scholar
Houellebecq, M. (2015b). Submission, trans. L. Stein. New York.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. (ed.) (1926). M. Annaei Lucani Belli Civilis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hugo, V. (1867). Paris-Guide de l’exposition universelle. Paris.Google Scholar
Hugo, V. (1889). Ninety Three, trans. F. L. Benedict, 2 vols. London and New York.Google Scholar
Hugo, V. (1970). Bug Jargal et le dernier jour d’un condamné. Paris.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J. K. (1969). Against the Grain (A Rebours). New York.Google Scholar
Jerphagnon, L. (ed.) (1998). Saint Augustin: Oeuvres. Cité de Dieu, vol. 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, B. (2002). Schundroman. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (ed.) (1989). Catull, 6th ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lankheit, K. (ed.) (1978). Marc: Schriften. Cologne.Google Scholar
Leduc-Adine, J.-P. (ed.) (1991). Zola: Ecrits sur l’art. Paris.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1960). Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Werke, vol. 8. Berlin, 111–207.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (ed.) (1981). Lucan, Civil War viii. Warminster.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. P., and Kerr, P. (eds.) (1970). Alexis de Tocqueville: Recollections, trans. G. Lawrence. Garden City, NJ.Google Scholar
Michelet, J. (1966–7). Histoire de France, 1837–1867, ed. Mettra, C.. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Michelet, J. (1952). Histoire de la Révolution française i & ii, ed. Walter, G.. Paris.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. (2007 [1580]). “De l’amitié,” in Balsamo, J. and Legros, A. (eds.), Essais. Paris, 189–202.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. L. de Secondat de (1951 [1748]). “De l’esprit des lois,” in Caillois, R. (ed.), Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, vol. 2. Paris, 225–995.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. L. de Secondat de (1949 [1721]). “Lettres persanes,” in Caillois, R. (ed.), Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, vol. 1. Paris, 129–373.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) (1969). P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1990). Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1975). Horace: Odes Book 1, corrected edition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Purnal, P., Thierry, J.-J., and Mélèze, J. (eds.) (1963). Préface de Cromwell, in Théâtre complet de Victor Hugo i. Paris, 409–54.Google Scholar
Seebacher, J., and Rosa, G. (eds.) (1987). Oeuvres complètes de Victor Hugo. Paris.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (ed.) (1985). The Annals of Quintius Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (ed.) (2012). Virgil. Aeneid Book xii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (ed.) (1988). Virgil: Georgics, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (1762). Mahomet. Brussels.Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. (ed.) (2003). Horace’s Epodes. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (ed.) (1978). Hesiod: Works and Days. Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (ed.) (1983). Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zemmour, E. (2014). Le suicide français. Paris.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abdurraqib, H. (2017). “Johnny Cash Never Shot a Man in Reno. Or, The Migos: Nice Kids from the Suburbs,” National Post, November 16: https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/books/johnny-cash-never-shot-a-man-in-reno-or-the-migos-nice-kids-from-the-suburbs.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2015). Stasis: La guerra civile come paradigma politica. Turin.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1976). Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1993). “Form Empowered: Lucan’s Pharsalia,” in Boyle (1993a): 125–42.Google Scholar
Alfaro, M. J. M. (1996). “Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept,” Atlantis 18/1–2: 268–85.Google Scholar
Al Malik, A. (2013). L’Islam au secours de la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Alston, R., and Spentzou, E. (2011). Reflections of Romanity: Discourses of Subjectivity in Imperial Rome, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Ambuhl, A.-M. (2010). “Lucan’s ‘Iliupersis’: Narrative Patterns from the Fall of Troy in Book 2 of the Bellum Civile,” in Hömke, N. and Reitz, C. (eds.), Lucan’s Bellum Civile Between Epic Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation. Berlin, 17–38.Google Scholar
Ambuhl, A.-M. (2016). “Thessaly as an Intertextual Landscape of Civil War in Latin Poetry,” in McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, 297–322.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2015). Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Contexts of Empire. Toronto.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (ed.) (2016). Citizenship and Empire in Europe 200–1900: The Antonine Constitution after 1800 Years. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
André, J. (1993). La Révolution fratricide: essai de psychanalyse du lien social. Paris.Google Scholar
Antoine, A. (2003). L’impensé de la démocratie: Tocqueville, la citoyenneté et la religion. Paris.Google Scholar
Arasse, D. (1987). La guillotine et l’imaginaire de la Terreur. Paris. Translated into English as The Guillotine and the Terror (1989), trans. Christopher Miller, London.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. London. Repr. 1965.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. (2017a). Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. (2017b). “On the Genealogy of Quarrels,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 178–89.Google Scholar
Armus, S. (2017). “Trying on the Veil: Sexual Autonomy and the End of the French Republic in Michel Houellebecq’s Submission,” French Politics, Culture & Society 35/1: 126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arquillière, H.-X. (1934). L’Augustinisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Arum, E. (2020). “Machiavelli’s Principio: Political Renewal and Innovation in the Discourses on Livy,” The Review of Politics 82/4: 525–47.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2009). “Fission and Fusion: Shifting Roman Identities in the Histories,” in Woodman (2009): 85–99.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H. (1989). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literature. London.Google Scholar
Asholt, W. (2016). “Vom Terrorismus zum Wandel durch Annäherung: Houellebecqs Soumission,” Romanische Studien 3: 119–36.Google Scholar
Auer, M. (2019). “Autonomie als Anlass: Die Ode zwischen politischer und literarischer Moderne,” dissertation, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1965). “Sermo humilis,” in Literary Language and Its Public, trans. R. Manheim, ed. Ziolkowski, J. M. Princeton, NJ, 25–66. Orig. publ. in Auerbach, E. (1958). Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter. Bern.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (2016). Mimesis und Figura, ed. Balke, F and Engelmeier, H. Munich.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Badinter, E. (1984). Émilie, Émilie: L’amibition feminine au XVIIIe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Badinter, E. (2010). Le conflit: La mère et la femme. Paris.Google Scholar
Baggesgaard, M. A. (2006). “The Complexities of Honesty: On the Prose of Michel Houellebecq,” in Bowd (2010): 159–70.Google Scholar
Bandera, C. (1981). “Sacrificial Levels in Virgil’s Aeneid,” Arethusa 14: 217–39.Google Scholar
Bannon, C. (1997). The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1994). “Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide,” Antike und Abendland 40: 109–24.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S. (eds.) (2004). Rituals in Ink. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Barr, R. R. (1962). “The Two Cities in Saint Augustine,” Laval théologique et philosophique 18: 211–29.Google Scholar
Barrera, G. (2021). La guerre civile: Histoire, philosophie, politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Barrett, A. (1999). Agrippina: Sex, Power, and Politics in the Early Empire. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Bartleson, J. (2017). “That Brutal Uncivilizer of Nations,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 153–59.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (ed.) (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1997). Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2012). “The Art of Sincerity: Pliny’s Panegyricus,” in Rees (2012): 148–93. Orig. publ. in Bartsch (1994): 148–87.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2015). Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (trans.) (2021). Vergil: The Aeneid. New York.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S., and Elsner, J. (eds.) (2007). Ekphrasis, special vol. Classical Philology 102.Google Scholar
Bastiaensen, A. (2001). “Augustine’s Pauline Exegesis and Ambrosiaster,” in Van Fleteren, F. and Schnaubelt, J. C. (eds.), Augustine: Biblical Exegete. Pieterlin and Bern, 33–54.Google Scholar
Batinsky, E. E. (1993). “Julia in Lucan’s Tripartite Vision of the Dead Republic,” in DeForest, M. (ed.), Woman’s Power, Man’s Game: Essay on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King, Wauconda, IL, 264–78.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (1997). “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics,” in Martindale (1997): 125–44.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. C. (1999). Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1993). “Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and Problems of Definition,” in Graf, F. (ed.), Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms. Stuttgart, 44–64.Google Scholar
Bénichou, P. (1973). Le sacre de l’écrivain 1750–1830: essai sur l’avènement d’un pouvoir spiritual laïque dans la France moderne. Paris.Google Scholar
Bénichou, P. (1977). Le Temps des prophètes: doctrines de l’âge romantique. Paris.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1982 [1927–1940]). Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, part 1: 5. Das Passagen-Werk 1, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Berest, A. (2015). Recherche femme parfaite. Paris.Google Scholar
Bettenworth, A. (2004). Gastmahlszenen in der Antiken Epik von Homer bis Claudian. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer de Ryke, B. (1999). “L’apport augustinien: Augustin et l’augustinisme politique,” in Renaut (1999): 43–86.Google Scholar
Bhatt, S. (2017). “The Augustan Principate and the Emergence of Biopolitics: A Comparative Historical Perspective,” Foucault Studies 22: 72–93.Google Scholar
Binder, G. (1971). Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Blaschka, K. (2015). Fiktion im Historischen. Die Bildsprache und die Konzeption der Charaktere in Lucans Bellum Civile. Rahden.Google Scholar
Bloch, H. (1994). God’s Plagiarist: Being an Account of the Fabulous Industry and Irregular Commerce of the Abbé Migne. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1973). The Anxiety of Influence. New York.Google Scholar
Blössner, N. (2007). “The City-Soul Analogy,” in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge, 345–85.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1973). Der Prozeß der theoretischen Neugierde. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1988 [1959]). “Kritik und Rezeption antiker Philosophie in der Patristik,” in Bohn, V. (ed.), Typologie: Internationale Beiträge zur Poetik. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bochet, I. (2004). “Le firmament de l’Écriture”: l’herméneutique augustinienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Boime, A. (1987). Art in an Age of Revolution, 1750–1800, vol. 1: Social History of Modern Art. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. (ed.) (1986). P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, Buch XIV–XV. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Börm, H., and Havener, W. (2012). “Octavians Rechtsstellung im Januar 27 v. Chr. und das Problem der ‘Übertragung’ der res publica,” Historia. Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 61/2: 202–20.Google Scholar
Börm, H., Mattheis, M., and Wienand, J. (eds.) (2016). Civil War in Ancient Greece and Rome: Contexts of Disintegration and Reintegration. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Borrutta, M. (2010). Antikatholizismus, Deutschland und Italien im Zeitalter der europäischen Kulturkämpfe. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bossuet, J. (1694). Maximes et réflexions sur la comédie. Paris.Google Scholar
Bowd, G. (2010). Le monde de Houellebecq. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1986). The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (ed.) (1993a). Roman Epic. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1993b). “Introduction: The Roman Song,” in Boyle (1993a): 1–18.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1993c). “The Canonic Text: Virgil’s Aeneid,” in Boyle (1993a): 79–107.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1999). “Aeneid 8: Images of Rome,” in Perkell (1999): 148–61.Google Scholar
Bramble, J. C. (1983). “Lucan,” in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), Cambridge History of Latin Literature, vol. 2.4. Cambridge, 37–61. Orig. publ. 1982.Google Scholar
Braund, S. (2012). “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric,” in Rees (2012): 85–108.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, H. (2012). Thomas Hobbes, der Leviathan: das Urbild des modernen Staates und seine Gegenbilder. 1651 – 2001. Berlin.Google Scholar
Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (2010). Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briant, P. (2012). Alexandre des lumières: fragments d’histoire européenne. Paris.Google Scholar
Brier, B. (2016). Cleopatra’s Needles: The Lost Obelisks of Egypt. London.Google Scholar
Bright, P. (ed. and trans.) (1999). Augustine and the Bible. Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
Brombert, V. (1984). Victor Hugo and the Visionary Novel. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. (1984). “‘Recalled to Life’: The Christian Myth of A Tale of Two Cities,” in Signs of the Times: Symbolic Realism in the Mid-Victorian World. London, 84–95.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. (2008). “Death in the First Person,” South Atlantic Quarterly 107/3: 530–46.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. L. (1967). Augustine of Hippo. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. L. (1972). “Political Society,” in Markus, R. A. (ed.), Augustine: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York, 311–29.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. L. (2012). Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, The Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 a.d. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bruère, R. T. (1951). “Lucan’s Cornelia,” Classical Philology 46: 221–36.Google Scholar
Bruggisser, P. (1987). Romulus servianus: la légende de Romulus dans les commentaires de Virgile de Servius: mythographie et idéologie à l’époque de la dynastie Théodosienne. Bonn.Google Scholar
Burton, P. (2012). “Augustine and Language,” in Vessey (2012): 113–24.Google Scholar
Bynum, C. W. (1984). Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1977). “Paganism and Literature in Late Fourth Century Rome,” in Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en Occident: huit exposés suivis de discussions, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 23 (Geneva), 1–40.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. (1999). “The Christological Substructure of Augustine’s Exegesis,” in Bright (1999): 74–103.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. (2012). Christ Meets Me Everywhere: Augustine’s Early Figurative Exegesis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Campion, P. (2004). “Raisons de la littérature: Quatrevingt-treize de Victor Hugo,” Romantisme 124/2: 103–14.Google Scholar
Cantarella, E. (1995). “Marzia e la locatio ventris,” in Raffaelli, R. (ed.), Vicende e figure femminili in Grecia e a Roma. Atti del Convegno Pesaro, 28–30 aprile 1994. Ancona, 251–58.Google Scholar
Caputo, J. D. (2012). “Augustine and Postmodernism,” in Vessey (2012): 492–504.Google Scholar
Caputo, J. D. and Scanlon, M. J. (eds.) (2005). Augustine and Postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Cary, P. (2005). “United Inwardly by Love: Augustine’s Social Ontology,” in Doody, Hughes, and Paffenroth (2005): 3–33.Google Scholar
Catani, D. (2011). “The French Revolution: Historical Necessity or Historical Evil? Terror and Slavery in Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize and Confiant’s L’Archet du colonel,” in Evans, D. and Griffiths, K. (eds.), Institutions and Power in Nineteenth-Century French Literature and Culture. Amsterdam, 51–67.Google Scholar
Celotto, G. (2015). “Lucan’s Influence on Tacitus’ Account of the Civil War between Otho and Vitellius.” Classical Association of the Mid-Western States (abstract at camws.org/sites/default/files/meeting2015/Abstracts2015/033.LucanonTacitus.pdf).Google Scholar
Chamarat-Malandain, G. (1991). “Voix et parole du peuple dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Peyronie, André (ed.), Révolution française, peuple et littératures: images du peuple révolutionnaire, théâtralité sans frontières. Actes du XXIIe Congrès de la Société Française de Littérature Générale et Comparée (Nantes-Angers 1989). Paris.Google Scholar
Chamarat-Malandain, G. (2005). “Langue, parole et savoir dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Naugrette, F. and Rosa, G. (eds.), Victor Hugo et la langue. Bréal, 279–97.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J. D. (2000). Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, K. (2002). “Ignorance and Aeneas’ Identity in the ‘Aeneid’,” Latomus 61/3: 616–27.Google Scholar
Chiu, A. (2010). “The Importance of Being Julia: Civil War, Historical Revision, and the Mutable Past in Lucan’s Pharsalia,” Classical Journal 105/4: 343–60.Google Scholar
Cho, M.-A. (1998). “La théorie des deux cités et le pouvoir politique selon saint Augustin,” in Jehasse and McKenna (1998): 11–16.Google Scholar
Christgau, R. (2006). “The Psychological Crafts of Marshall Bruce Mathers III,” The Believer, February: www.robertchristgau.com/xg/music/eminem-06.php.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2015). “La vittoria e il tempio: interpretazione del proemio al iii libro delle Georgiche,” in Fedeli and Günther (2015): 39–88.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1991). “Virtutes Imperatoriae,” Arctos 25: 17–39.Google Scholar
Coates, T.-N. (2013) “Hip-hop Speaks to the Guns.” New York Times, February 6: www.nytimes.com/2013/02/07/opinion/coates-hip-hop-speaks-to-the-guns.html.Google Scholar
Compagnon, A. (2005). Les antimodernes: de Joseph de Maistre à Roland Barthes. Paris.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2015). The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2017). “The Romans Tried to Save the Republic from Men like Trump. They Failed.” Village Voice, January 17.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1998). Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. and ed. Segal, C. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1988). La “guerra civile” di Lucano: studi e prove di commento. Urbino.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1992). “Proems in the Middle.” Yale Classical Studies 29: 147–59.Google Scholar
Cornwell, H. (2017). Pax and the Politics of Peace: Republic to Principate. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cramer, T. (2005). “Das Subjekt und sein Widerschein. Beobachtung zum Wandel der Spiegelmetapher in Antike und Mittelalter,” in Bausch, M. (ed.), Inszenierungen von Subjektivität in der Literatur des Mittelalters. Königstein, 213–29.Google Scholar
Creuzer, F. (1837). Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen, vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (2013). European Literature and the Latin Middles Ages. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1954). Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica. Mainz.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (2015). Studies on the Text of Caesar’s Bellum Civile. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, T. (1993). “Ambivalences within a Totalizing Discourse: Augustine’s Sermons on the Sack of Rome,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1: 405–21.Google Scholar
De Maistre, J. (1884). “Éclaircissement sur les Sacrifices,” in Oeuvres complètes de J. de Maistre. New edition, vol. 5. Lyon, 283–360.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1979). Allegories of Reading. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. (ed.) (1984–91). Enciclopedia Virgiliana, 6 vols. Florence.Google Scholar
Denby, D. (1997). “Civil War, Revolution and Justice in Victor Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize,” Romance Studies 15/2: 7–17.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1994). Politique de l’amitié. Paris.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1998). Demeure: Maurice Blanchot. Paris.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2000). Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Dilmac, B. (2014). “Houellebecq’s ‘Fin de Siècle’: Crisis of Society, Crisis of the Novel: Thematic and Poetological Intertextuality between Michel Houellebecq and Joris-Karl Huysmans,” in Landgraf, D. (ed.), Decadence in Literature and Intellectual Debate Since 1945. New York, 153–69.Google Scholar
Dodaro, R. (2004). Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dodaro, R. (2012). “Augustine on the Statesman and the Two Cities,” in Vessey (2012): 386–97.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, C. (1967). Gli obelischi di Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Doody, J., Hughes, K. L., and Paffenroth, K. (2005). Augustine and Politics. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. (2013). “Militia amoris: Fighting in Love’s Army,” in Thorsen, T. S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge, 194–206.Google Scholar
Drumont, E. (1886). La France juive devant l’opinion. Paris.Google Scholar
Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. (1996). “Caesi Iuvenci and Pietas Impia in Virgil,” The Classical Journal 91/3: 277–86.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. (2001). King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil’s Aeneid. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1961). The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1967). The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2006). “Excess and History in Hugo’s Ninety-three,” in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel, vol. 2, Forms and Themes. Princeton, NJ, 274–94.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1992). From a Sabine Jar: Reading Horace, Odes 1.9. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993). The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (ed.) (1999). Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2007). Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Elm, S. (1996). The Virgins of God: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Elm, S. (2017). “Signs under the Skin: Flogging Eternal Rome,” in Därmann, I. and Macho, T. (eds.), Unter die Haut: Tätowierungen als Logo- und Piktogramme. Paderborn, 51–75.Google Scholar
Elshtain, J. B. (1995). Augustine and the Limits of Politics. South Bend, IN.Google Scholar
Engels, D. (2013). Le déclin: la crise de l’Union européenne et la chute de la République romaine: quelques analogies historiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Esposito, R. (2011). Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life, trans. A. Hanafi. Cambridge, MA. Orig. publ. 2002.Google Scholar
Fagen, L. (2017). “Kendrick Lamar goes back to Bangers.” Hyperallergic, July 22: https://hyperallergic.com/391650/kendrick-lamar-goes-back-to-bangers/.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1985). “Caesar and the Mutiny: Lucan’s Reshaping of the Historical Tradition in De bello civili 5.237–373,” Classical Philology 80: 119–31.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1989) “Allecto’s First Victim: A Study of Vergil’s Amata,” in Stahl (1998): 135–53.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2010). “Discordia Fratrum: Aspects of Lucan’s Conception of Civil War”, in Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford, 207–20.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., and Nelis, D. (eds.) (2013). Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J., and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2010). A Companion to Virgil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Favier, J. (1971). Finance et fiscalité au bas Moyen Âge. Paris.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P., and Günther, H.-C. (eds.) (2015). Studies on Vergil in Honour of Mario Geymonat (26.1.1941–17. 2.2012). Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1984). “The Reconciliations of Juno,” Classical Quarterly ns 34: 179–94.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1998). Literature and Religion at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2004). “Sacrificial Ritual in Roman Poetry,” in Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens (2004): 1–22.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2017). “Carthage and Rome: An Introduction,” Classical Philology 112/3: 301–11.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2014). “Viewing Myth and History on the Shield of Aeneas,” Classical Antiquity 33/2: 281–318.Google Scholar
Felman, S. (1981). “Rereading Femininity,” Yale French Studies 62: 19–44.Google Scholar
Ferguson, P. P. (1994). Paris as Revolution: Writing the Nineteenth-Century City. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Ferguson, P. P. (1998). “Quatrevingt-treize: Turning the Terror to Account,” in Denommé, R. T. and Simon, R. H. (eds.), Unfinished Revolutions: Legacies of Upheaval in Modern French Culture. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2005). City and Soul in Plato’s Republic. Chicago.Google Scholar
Fertik, H. (2018). “Obligation and Devotion: Creating a New Community in Lucan’s Bellum Civile,” Classical Philology 113: 449–71.Google Scholar
Fertik, H. (2019). The Ruler’s House: Contesting Power and Privacy in Julio-Claudian Rome. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Flower, H. (2006). The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Flower, H. (2010). Roman Republics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fögen, M. T. (2002). Römische Rechtsgeschichten: Über Ursprung und Evolution eines sozialen Systems. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Fomin, A. (1977). “Theatrum Philosophicum,” in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon. Ithaca, NY, 165–96.Google Scholar
Fomin, A. (2016). “Speeches in Dio Cassius,” in Lange, C. J. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden, 217–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1987). “Vergil on Killing Virgins,” in Whitby, M. et al. (eds.), Homo Viator: Essays for John Bramble. Bristol, 185–98.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1990). “Deviant Focalization in Vergil’s Aeneid,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 216: 42–63.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1995). “Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford, 248–66.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1998). “Opening the Gates of War: Aeneid 7.601–640,” in Stahl (1998): 155–74.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000). Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frank, T., Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., and Matala de Mazza, E. (2002). Des Kaisers neue Kleider: Über das Imaginäre politischer Herrschaft. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Freccero, J. (1975). “The Fig Tree and the Laurel: Petrarch’s Poetics,” Diacritics 5/1: 34–40.Google Scholar
Freccero, J. (1986). Dante: The Poetics of Conversion. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2001). Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2014). “Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus,” Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–32.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2018a). “Donald Trump and Rome’s Mad Emperors,” Common Dreams, April 29.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2018b). “Donald Trump and the Tiberian Lie,” Common Dreams, December 4.Google Scholar
Frisch, A. (2018). “Emotional Justice in Agrippa d’Aubigné’s Tragiques,” Forum for Modern Language Studies 54/1: 73–84.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (2004). Augustinus. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (2011). “Krieg und (Un-)Gerechtigkeit. Augustin zu Ursache und Sinn von Kriegen,” in Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (eds.), War in Words: Transformation of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz. Berlin, 23–36.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1959). “Proscriptio,” in Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 23.2. Stuttgart, 2439–44.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M. (2001). “Les abeilles et les araignées,” in Lecoq, A.-M. (ed.), La querelle des anciens et des modernes: XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles. Paris, 7–218.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, A. (1965). Heilsplan und natürliche Entwicklung: Formen der Gegenwartsbestimmung im Geschichtsdenken des hohen Mittelalters. Munich.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method. London.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, D. (1987). “Il banchetto in Lucano (note a Phars. 10.104–71),” Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 5: 186–92.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2000). Virgil on the Nature of Things. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2003). “Poetry and the Backward Glance in Virgil’s ‘Georgics’ and ‘Aeneid’,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133/2: 323–52.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2013). “Virgil’s Caesar: Intertextuality and Ideology,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 278–96.Google Scholar
Gauvard, , C., de Libera, A., and Zink, M. (2004). Dictionnaire du Moyen Âge. Paris.Google Scholar
Geue, T. (2018). “Soft Hands, Hard Power: Sponging Off the Empire of Leisure (Virgil, Georgics 4),” Journal of Roman Studies 108: 115–40.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2006). The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gillis, D. (1983). Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Rome.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. D. (2011). “Ingens as an Etymological Pun in the Octavia,” Classical Philology 106/4: 357–60.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. D. (2017a). Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. D. (2017b). “Ut et hostem amarem: Jocasta and the Poetics of Civil War in Seneca’s Phoenissae,” in Trinacty, C. and Sampson, M. (eds.), Verba Aliter Instructa: Senecan Poetics, special volume on Senecan poetics. Ramus 46/1–2: 58–74.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. D., and Krasne, D. A. (eds.) (2018). After 69 ce: Writing Civil War in Flavian Rome. Trends in Classics, supplementary vol. 65. Berlin.Google Scholar
Girard, R. (1972). La violence et le sacré. Paris.Google Scholar
Giusti, E. (2018). Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gohin, Y. (2002). “Alternance et adherence des contraires dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Hiddleston, J. A. (ed.), Victor Hugo: romancier de l’abîme. Oxford, 156–78.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. J., and Gorman, V. B. (2014). Corrupting Luxury in Ancient Greek Literature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Götze, K.-H. (2016). “Sind wir noch zu retten? Überlegungen zur Kulturkritik und Handlungsstruktur in Houellebecqs Unterwerfung,” in Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 239–50.Google Scholar
Govrin, J. (2016). Sex, Gott und Kapital: Houellebecqs “Unterwerfung” zwischen neoreaktionärer Rhetorik und postsäkularen Politiken. Münster.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2013). “Afterword,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 319–32.Google Scholar
Gransden, K. W. (1985). “The Fall of Troy,” Greece and Rome 32: 60–72.Google Scholar
Grewing, F., and Acosta-Hughes, B. (eds.) (2013). The Door Ajar: False Closure in Classical Antiquity. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1985). Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar
Grossman, K. (2012). The Later Novels of Victor Hugo: Variations on the Politics and Poetics of Transcendence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (2011). Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A. (1995). Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Haarhoff, T. J. (1960). “Vergil and Cornelius Gallus,” Classical Philology 55: 101–8.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1990). “Sacrifice, Society, and Vergil’s Ox-Born Bees,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses. Atlanta, 209–23.Google Scholar
Haecker, T. (1931). Vergil: Vater des Abendlands. Olten.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1967). Augustine and the Latin Classics, 2 vols. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. (1997). Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. F. (1994). “Terrorizing the ‘Feminine’ in Hugo, Dickens, and France,” Symposium 48.3: 204–15.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. T. (2013). Security: Politics, Humanity, and the Philology of Care. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2014). Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hampton, T. (1993). “‘Turkish Dogs’: Rabelais, Erasmus, and the Rhetoric of Alterity,” Representations 41: 58–82.Google Scholar
Harder, H. (2018). “Finding Fulfillment through Submission, or How the French Should Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Islam: Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission,” in Peer, L. H. (ed.), Transgressive Romanticism. Newcastle upon Tyne, 76–91.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1986). Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993). The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2013). “Trojan Palimpsests: The Archaeology of Roman History in Aeneid 2,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 107–23.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2014). The Last Cultural Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. New York.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2018). “Augustan and Late Antique Intratextuality: Virgil’s Aeneid and Prudentius’ Psychomachia,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 159–70.Google Scholar
Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H., and Pollmann, K. (eds.) (2013). Der Fall Roms und seine Wiederauferstehungen in Antike und Mittelalter. Berlin.Google Scholar
Harris, W. (2001). Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1990a). “Some Views of the Aeneid in the Twentieth Century,” in Harrison (1990b): 1–20.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) (1990b). Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., Frangoulides, S., and Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.) (2018). Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A. (2000). “Allegorie,” in Barck, K., Fontius, M., Schlenstedt, D., Steinwachs, B., and Wolfzettel, F. (eds.), Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, vol. 1. Stuttgart, 49–103.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A. (2004). Latenzzeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A. (2009). Metaphorologie. Zur Praxis von Theorie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. S. (1975). “Polemical Counterpoint in De Civitate Dei,” Augustinian Studies 6: 97–106.Google Scholar
Heil, A. (2007). “Christliche Deutung der Eklogen Vergils. Die Tityre-Initiale im Codex Klosterneuburg CCl 742,” Antike und Abendland 53: 100–19.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1915). Virgils Epische Technik, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1993). Virgil’s Epic Technique, trans. of Heinze 1915 by H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963). Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république. Paris.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1987). “Lucan: The Word at War,” Ramus 16: 122–64.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (1994). “Kénose,” in Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible. Paris.Google Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. (1998). The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Lucan. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heyking, J. von (2001). Augustine and Politics as Longing in the World. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Hill, T. (2004). Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and Self in Roman Thought and Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hofmann, F. (1933). Der Kirchenbegriff des heiligen Augustinus in seinen Grundlagen und in seiner Entwicklung. Munich.Google Scholar
Hollander, A. (1994). Sex and Suits. New York.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, M. (2010). The Pilgrim City: St Augustine of Hippo and His Innovation in Political Thought. London.Google Scholar
Holsclaw, G. (2016). Transcending Subjects: Augustine, Hegel, and Theology. Chichester.Google Scholar
Horne, A. J. (2018). “Georgic Justice,” Vergilius 64: 3–29.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1995). A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar
Huet, V. (1999). “Napoleon I: A New Augustus?” in Edwards, C. (ed.), Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945. Cambridge, 53–69.Google Scholar
Hugedé, N. (1957). La métaphore du miroir dans les épîtres de saint Paul aux Corinthiens. Paris.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (1993). The Family Romance of the French Revolution. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York.Google Scholar
Hussey, A. (2010). “Présence humaine: Michel Houellebecq, poet-chansonnier,” in Bowd (2010): 59–70.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J.-K. (1977 [1884]). A rebours, ed. Fumaroli, M. Paris.Google Scholar
Inglebert, H. (1996). Les Romains chrétiens face à l’histoire de Rome. Histoire, chistianisme et romanité en Occident dans l’Antiquité tardive. Paris.Google Scholar
Inglebert, H. (2016). “Christian Reflections on Roman Citizenship (200–430),” in Ando (2016): 99–112.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1962). “Le rôle des Barbares dans les guerres civiles de Rome, de Sylla à Vespasien,” Latomus 21: 8–48.Google Scholar
Jal, P. (1963). La Guerre civile à Rome. Étude littéraire et morale. Paris.Google Scholar
James, S. (1995). “Establishing Rome with the Sword: Condere in the Aeneid,” American Journal of Philology 116/4: 623–37.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (1978). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Jehasse, J., and McKenna, A. (eds.) (1998). Religion et Politique: Les avatars de l’augustinisme. Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. J. (2008). Ovid before Exile: Art and Punishment in the “Metamorphoses,” Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1965). “Aeneas and the Ironies of Pietas,” Classical Journal 60: 360–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1976). Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1987). Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1977). “Eurydice and Proserpina in the Georgics,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 107: 161–72.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1980). Virgil’s Agricultural Golden Age: A Study of the Georgics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Joseph, T. A. (2012). Tacitus the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Leiden.Google Scholar
Josephson, M. (1942). Victor Hugo: A Realistic Biography of the Great Romantic. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R. (2002). “The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia,” in McClure, L. K. (ed.), Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World. Oxford, 163–87.Google Scholar
Junkerjürgen, R. (2009). Haarfarben: Eine Kulturgeschichte in Europa seit der Antike. Cologne.Google Scholar
Kallendorf, C. (1989). In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Early Renaissance. Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. (2011). Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. (2018). “The Founders Hated Excessive Flattery. What Would They Think about the Trump Administration?” Washington Post, January 22.Google Scholar
Kasper, J., and Wild, C. (2015). Rom rückwärts: Europäische Übertragungsschicksale. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1988). The Guardians of Language. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Keitel, E. (2010). “The Art of Losing: Tacitus and the Disaster Narrative,” in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 331–52.Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2018). “Engendering Civil War in Flavian Epic,” in Ginsberg and Krasne (2018): 295–320.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1992). “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London, 26–58.Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. (2020). Recovering a Late-Antique Edition of Pliny’s Natural History. New York.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. (1969). “Augustus und Alexander,” Gymnasium 76: 430–56.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, N. (2015). Lucan und der Prinzipat. Inkonsistenz und unzuverlässiges Erzählen im “Bellum Civile.” Berlin.Google Scholar
King, P. (2014). “Augustine on Language,” in Meconi and Stump (2014): 292–310.Google Scholar
Kittsteiner, D. (1991). Die Entstehung des modernen Gewissens. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. N. (1964). Die Aeneis und Homer. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Knobloch, C. (2016). “Houellebecqs Unterwerfung als kulturkritische Diskursanalyse gelesen,” Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 251–63.Google Scholar
Kölmel, W. (1970). Regimen Christianum: Weg und Ergebnisse des Gewaltenverhältnisses und Gewaltenverständnisses (8. bis 14. Jahrhundert). Berlin.Google Scholar
Komorowska, A. (2016). “‘Mais c’est d’une ambigüité étrange’: die Rezeption von Michel Houellebecqs Roman ‘Soumission’ in Frankreich und Deutschland,” Romanische Studien 3: 137–69.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1977). Catullus’ Indictment of Rome: The Meaning of Catullus 64. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2018). “Praise and Flattery in the Latin Epic: A Case of Intertextuality,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 341–52.Google Scholar
Koppenfels, M. von (2012). Schwarzer Peter: Der Fall Littell, die Leser und die Täter. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J. (1990). Rhetorik und Theodizee: Studie zur hermeneutischen Funktionalität der Rhetorik bei Augustin. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., Frank, T., and Matala de Mazza, E. (2007). Der fiktive Staat: Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans. K. Tribe. New York.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (1991). “Initium turbandi omnia a femina ortum est: Fabia Minor and the Election of 367 b.c.,” Phoenix 45/4: 314–25.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980a). Pouvoir de l’horreur: Essai sur l’abjection. Paris.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980b). “The Bounded Text,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, 36–63.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980c). “Word, Dialogue and Novel,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, 64–91.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1989). Etrangers à nous-mèmes. Paris.Google Scholar
Krulic, B. (2011). “Une lecture théologico-politique de l’idée démocratique: Edgar Quinet.” www.dogma.lu.Google Scholar
La Bonnaridière, A.-M. (1999). “Augustine’s Biblical Initiation,” in Bright (1999): 5–25.Google Scholar
La Bua, G. (2013). “Horace’s East: Ethics and Politics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 265–96.Google Scholar
Lacchè, L. (2016). “Expanding Citizenship? The French Experience Surrounding the Code Napoléon,” in Ando (2016): 177–98.Google Scholar
Lachmann, R. (1990). Gedächtnis und Literatur: Intertextualität in der russischen Moderne. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Lammel, I. (2015). Der Toussaint-Louverture-Mythos: Transformationen in der französischen Literatur, 1791–2012. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2009). Res Publica Constituta. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2013). “Triumph and Civil War in the Late Republic,” Papers of the British School at Rome 81: 67–90.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2016a). Review of Börm, Mattheis, and Wienand (2016), The Classical Review 66.2: 502–4; long version available at www.academia.edu/18710216/Review_of_Börm_H._Mattheis_M._and_Wienand_J._eds._2015_Civil_War_in_Ancient_Greece_and_Rome_Contexts_of_Disintegration_and_Reintegration_Stuttgart_Steiner_The_Classical_Review_forthcoming_long_version (accessed Jan. 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2016b). Triumphs in the Age of Civil War: The Late Republic and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2017). “Stasis and Bellum Civile: A Difference in Scale?,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/1: 129–40.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2019). “Augustus, the Res Gestae, and the End of Civil War: Unpleasant Events?” in Lange and Vervaet (2019a): 185–209.Google Scholar
Lange, C., and Vervaet, F. (eds.) (2019a). The Historiography of Late Republican Civil War. Leiden: 263–91.Google Scholar
Lange, C., and Vervaet, F. (2019b). “Sulla and the Origins of the Concept of Bellum Civile,” in Lange and Vervaet (2019a): 17–28.Google Scholar
Lange, K. (1966). “Geistliche Speise: Untersuchungen zur Metaphorik der Bibelhermeneutik,” Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 95/2: 81–122.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2011). “Roman Exempla and Situation Ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis,” Journal of Roman Studies 101: 100–22.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2015). “Roman Exemplarity: Mediating between General and Particular,” in Lowrie and Lüdemann (2015): 68–80.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2018). Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laurent, F. (2002). “‘La guerre civile? qu’est-ce à dire? Est-ce qu’il y a une guerre étrangère?’” in Millet, C. and Rebérioux, M. (eds.), Hugo et la guerre. Paris, 133–56.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2017). “Writing Revolt in the Early Roman Empire,” in Firnhaber-Baker, J. and Schoenars, D. (eds.), The Routledge History Handbook of Medieval Revolt. Abingdon, 19–38.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (1997). “Inside and Outside the Republic,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), Plato’s Republic: Critical Essays. New York, 61–94.Google Scholar
Lee, O. (1979). Fathers and Sons in Virgil’s Aeneid. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Lee, O. (1989). “The Golden Age: Eclogue 4,” in Death and Rebirth in Virgil’s Arcadia. Albany, NY, 77–88.Google Scholar
Lee, O. (1996). Virgil as Orpheus: A Study of the Georgics. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1998). “Vergil as a Republican,” in Stahl (1998): 101–18.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. (1981). “Permanence du théologico-politique?” Le temps de la reflexion 2: 13–60; reprinted in Lefort (1986): 251–300.Google Scholar
Lefort, C. (1986). Essais sur le politique (XIXe–XXe siècles). Paris.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. (1964). La pénétration du Droit romain dans le Droit canonique classique de Gratien à Innocent IV, 1140–1254. Paris.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997). Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. D. (2004). “Ritual? What Ritual?”, in Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens (2004): 149–53.Google Scholar
Leopold, S. (2014). “Eros und Polis: Aeneas und die Folgen: von Augustus zu Richelieu,” in Liebe im Ancien Régime: Eros und Polis von Corneille bis Sade. Paderborn, 62–76.Google Scholar
Leupin, A. (1993). Fiction et incarnation. Paris.Google Scholar
Levene, D. (2000). “Sallust’s ‘Catiline’ and Cato the Censor,” Classical Quarterly ns 50: 170–91.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. (1974). “The Rape of Troy: Infantile Perspective in Book ii of the Aeneid,” Arethusa 7: 103–13.Google Scholar
Lilla, M. (2015). “Slouching toward Mecca,” review of M. Houellebecq, Soumission, New York Review of Books, April 2: www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/04/02/slouching-toward-mecca/.Google Scholar
Lim, R. (2012). “Augustine and Roman Spectacles,” in Vessey (2012): 138–50.Google Scholar
Lim, W. S. H. (2010). John Milton, Radical Politics, and Biblical Republicanism. Cranbury.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1994). “Thought, Life, and Literature at Rome,” Latomus 227: 5–71.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C. (1999). “The Evander–Anchises Connection: Fathers, Sons, and Homoerotic Desire in Vergil’s Aeneid,” Vergilius 45: 3–21.Google Scholar
Lobur, J. A. (2011). “Resuscitating a Text: Velleius’ History as Cultural Evidence,” in Cowan, E. (ed.), Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea, 203–18.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1997a). “La guerre dans la famille,” Clio 5: 21–62.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1997b). La cité divisée: l’oubli dans la mémoire d’Athènes. Paris.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1997). Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2001). “Literature Is a Latin Word,” Vergilius 2001: 29–38.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2005). “Vergil and Founding Violence,” Cardozo Law Review 25: 945–76.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2007). “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus,” in Heyworth, S. J., with Fowler, P. G. and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford, 91–112.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008). “Evidence and Narrative in Mérimée’s Catilinarian Conspiracy,” New German Critique 103: 9–25.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2010a). “Rom immer wieder gegründet,” in Döring, T., Vinken, B., and Zöller, G. (eds.), Übertragene Anfänge: Imperiale Figurationen um 1800. Paderborn, 23–49.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2010b). “Horace, Odes 4,” in Davis, G. (ed.), A Companion to Horace. Chichester, 210–30.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2013). “Foundation and Closure,” in Grewing and Acosta-Hughes (2013): 83–102.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2014). “Politics by Other Means: Horace’s Ars Poetica,” in Ferenczi, A. and Hardie, P. (eds.), New Approaches to Horace’s Ars Poetica, Materiali e Discussioni 72/1: 121–42.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2015a). “Rege incolumi: Orientalism and Security at Georgics 4.212,” in Fedeli and Günther (2015): 321–42.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2015b). “Le corps du chef: transformations dans la sphère publique à l’époque d’Horace,” in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N., and Thevenaz, O. (eds.), Le poète lyrique dans la cité antique. Lyon, 71–86.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2015c). “The Egyptian Within: A Roman Trope for Civil War,” in Vinken, B. (ed.), Translatio Babylonis: Unsere orientalische Moderne. Paderborn, 13–28.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2015d). “Reversio (Lucan),” in Kasper and Wild (2015): 171–8.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2018). “Figures of Discord and the Roman Addressee in Horace, Odes 3.6,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 211–25.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (forthcoming a). “Political Thought,” in Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (forthcoming b). Security, Safety, and Care: A Roman Political Discourse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M., and Lüdemann, S. (2015). Exemplarity and Particularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M., and Vinken, B. (2018). “Correcting Rome with Rome: Victor Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize,” in Dufallo, B. (ed.), Roman Error: Classical Reception and the Problem of Rome’s Flaws. Oxford, 179–90.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M., and Vinken, G. (2019). “Married to civil war: a Roman trope in Lucan’s poetics of history,” in C. H. Lange and F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Historiography of Late Republican Civil War. Leiden, 263–91.Google Scholar
Lubac, H. de (1984). “Augustinisme politique?” in Théologie d’occasion. Paris, 255–308.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. (2013). “Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman Republic,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 124–45.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. (2016). “The Poetics of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 109: 383–427.Google Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. (2018). “Vergil’s Sophoclean Thebans,” Vergilius 64: 131–56.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. (1998). The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. (1999). “Classical Authors,” in Fitzgerald, A. D. (ed.), Augustine Through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, MI, 202–6.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). “Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: ‘Pleasure under Patriarchy’,” Ethics 99/2: 314–46.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. A. (1996). Only Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. (2016). Legible Religion. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1991). A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mandouze, A., and Fouilheron, J. (eds.) (1985). Migne et le renouveau des études patristiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Maraval, P. (ed. and trans.) (2001). Eusèbe de Césarée: la théologie politique de l’Empire chrétien. Louanges de Constantin (Triakontaétérikos). Paris.Google Scholar
Marchesi, S. (2011). Dante and Augustine. Toronto.Google Scholar
Marchetta, A. (2013). Vita agreste e poesia agreste nel finale del ii libro delle Georgiche di Virgilio. Tivoli.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010). “Eros and Empire: Virgil and the Historians on Civil War,” in C. S. Kraus, J. Marincola, and C. Pelling (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 183–204.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1977). L`idole et la distance. Paris.Google Scholar
Maris, B. (2014). Houellebecq économiste. Paris.Google Scholar
Markell, P. (2009). Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1958 [1938]). Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997). The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maschek, D. (2018). Die römischen Bürgerkriege: Archäologie und Geschichte einer Krisenzeit. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Masters, J. (1992). Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mathy, J.-P. (2017). “Le Terroir, l’Histoire, et la Vierge Noire: ce qui ne passe pas (encore) dans Soumission de Michel Houellebecq,” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 21/3: 257–265.Google Scholar
Matthes, M. (2000). The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Mayer, C. (ed.) (1986–). Augustinus-Lexikon, 3 vols. Basel.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, G. (1979). Dante: Poet of the Desert. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
McAleer, G. (2020). “Victorian Pagans,” Law and Liberty, October 2: https://lawliberty.org/book-review/victorian-pagans/.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. (2011). Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mebane, J. (2016). “Pompey’s Head and the Body Politic in Lucan’s De bello civili,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 146/1: 191–215.Google Scholar
Mebane, J. (2017). The Body Politic and Roman Political Languages. Chicago.Google Scholar
Mecke, J. (2003). “Der Fall Houellebecq: Zu Formen und Funktionen eines Literaturskandals,” in Eggeling, G. and Segler-Meßner, S. (eds.), Europäische Verlage und romanische Gegenwartsliteraturen: Profile, Tendenzen, Strategien. Tübingen, 194–217.Google Scholar
Meconi, D. V., and Stump, E. (2014). The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mehlman, J. (1977). Revolution and Repetition: Marx/Hugo/Balzac. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Meizoz, J. (2007). Postures littéraires: mises en scène modernes de l’auteur. Geneva.Google Scholar
Mercati, M. (1981). Gli obelischi di Roma. Bologna.Google Scholar
Micale, M. S. (1990). “Charcot and the Idea of Hysteria in the Male,” Medical History 34: 363–411.Google Scholar
Migne, J. P. (1865). Patrologiae cursus completus. Latina series. Successores. Paris.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. (1980). Virgil’s Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. (2005). Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. N. (1991). “The Violence of Virginity,” Arethusa 24: 219–38.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1942). “Camillus and Concord,” Classical Quarterly 36: 111–20.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1977). “Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century a.d.,” in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Oxford, 107–26. Orig. publ. Momigliano, A. (ed.) (1963). The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century. Oxford, 79–99.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1990). “Tacitus and the Tacitist Tradition,” in The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley, CA, 109–31.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999). Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s ‘Georgics.’ Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morley, N. (2007). “Civil War and Succession Crisis in Roman Beekeeping,” Historia 56/4: 462–70.Google Scholar
Morrey, D. (2018). “The Banality of Monstrosity: On Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission,” Australian Journal of French Studies 55/2: 202–17.Google Scholar
Morrissey, R. (2010). Napoléon et l’héritage de la gloire. Paris.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. (2005). “Ennius and Lucilius,” in Freudenburg (2005): 33–47.Google Scholar
Mulhern, E. V. (2017). “Roma(na) Matrona,” Classical Journal 112/4: 432–59.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. R. (1999). Jean-François Millet: Drawn into the Light. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (2007). Are We Rome? The Fall of an Empire and the Fate of America. Boston.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. (ed.) (2017). Lecture de l’éducation sentimentale. Rennes.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2002). Lucano: Un’ epica contro l’impero. Rome.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2004). “From Didactic to Epic: Georgics 2.458–3.48,” in Gale, M. (ed.), Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea, 73–108.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2013). “Past, Present, and Future in Vergil’s Georgics,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 244–62.Google Scholar
Nelsestuen, G. (2015). Varro the Agronomist: Political Philosophy, Satire, and Agriculture in the Late Republic. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1967). The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. Brussels.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, G. (1983). Augustine’s Philosophy in Relation to History and Politics (VHS recording).Google Scholar
Nirenberg, D. (2013). Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition. New York.Google Scholar
Noiriel, G. (2019). Le venin dans la plume: Édouard Drumont, Éric Zemmour et la part sombre de la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Nonnenmacher, K. (2016). “Unterwerfung als Konversion: Als-Ob-Bekehrungen zu Katholizismus und Islam bei Carrère und Houellebecq,” Romanische Studien 3: 171–98.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (1980). “Augustine’s Classical Readings,” Recherches Augustiniennes et patristiques 15: 144–75.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (1991). “The Authority of Augustine,” Augustinian Studies 22: 7–35.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (2000). “The Next Life of Augustine,” in Klingshirn, W. E. and Vessey, M. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Latin Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus. Ann Arbor, MI, 215–31.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (2001). “Augustine: His Time and Lives,” in Stump and Kretzman (2001): 8–25.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (2005). Augustine, Sinner and Saint: A New Biography. London.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (1995). “Shifting Ground: Lucan, Tacitus, and the Landscape of Civil War,” Hermathena 158: 117–31.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (2000). Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. (1990). Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ohly, F. (1977 [1958]). “Vom geistigen Sinn des Wortes im Mittelalter,” in Schriften zur mittelalterlichen Bedeutungsforschung. Darmstadt, 1–31.Google Scholar
Olender, M. (2002). Les langues du Paradis: Aryens et Sémites, un couple providential. Paris.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1997). “Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Aeneid,” in Martindale (1997): 294–311.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1998). Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2001). “Freud’s Aeneid,” Vergilius 47: 39–63.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2009). Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Orlin, E. (ed.) (2016). Routledge Encyclopedia of Ancient Mediterranean Religions. New York.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2014). Turia: A Roman Woman’s Civil War. Oxford.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2015). “Ending Civil War at Rome: Rhetoric and Reality (88 bce – 197 ce),” American Historical Review 120/5: 1683–95.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2018). Rome and the Making of a World State. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1964). Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Otten, W., and Pollmann, K. (eds.) (2007). Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Owens, P. (2017). “Decolonizing Civil War,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 160–9.Google Scholar
Ozouf, M. (1989). L’homme régénéré: essai sur la Révolution française. Paris.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. (2004). Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. (2008). “Toward a Model of Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome,” in E. Horn (ed.), Dark Powers: Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theory in History and Literature, special issue, New German Critique 103: 27–49.Google Scholar
Palais de Tokyo (2016). Magazine Palais 23.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. (2018). The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Response to Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paris, G., and Buchon, J. A. C. (1827). Chronique métrique de Philippe-le-Bel suivie de la taille de Paris, en 1313. Verdière.Google Scholar
Parry, A. (1963). “The Two Voices of Virgil’s ‘Aeneid’,” Arion 2/4: 66–80.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. (1998). Virgil’s Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pedullà, G. (2011). Machiavelli in tumulto: Conquista, cittadinanza e conflitto nei “Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio.” Rome.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2019). Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, J. (2007). “Note sur la double description de la ‘bugonia’ au chant iv des ‘Géorgiques’ (295–314 et 538–47),” Latomus 66/2: 336–41.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. (1976 [1958]). Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grèques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes. Paris.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. (1987). La tradition de l’allégorie de Philon d’Alexandrie à Dante. Paris.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (1978). “A Reading of Vergil’s Fourth Georgic,” Phoenix 32: 211–22.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (1989). The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (ed.) (1999). Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Petrey, S. (1980). History in the Text: Quatrevingt-Treize and the French Revolution. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Peyrache-Leborgne, D. (1996). “Roman historique et roman-idylle chez Dickens et Hugo: A Tale of Two Cities and Quatrevingt-treize,” Dalhousie French Studies 36: 51–67.Google Scholar
Piccaluga, G. (1995). “Fondazione della realtà e uscita della storia nel Sermo ‘de urbis excidio’,” Augustinianum 53: 497–510.Google Scholar
Pichon, R. (1912). Les sources de Lucain. Paris.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1988). Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Pogorzelski, R. J. (2016). Virgil and Joyce: Nationalism and Imperialism in the Aeneid and Ulysses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Pollman, K., and Otten, W. (eds.) (2013). The Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pornschlegel, C. (2015). “Das unerhörte Verlangen: Zu Michel Houellebecqs Roman ‘Unterwerfung’,” Stimmen der Zeit 9: 611–22.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. (2001). Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Price, J. J. (2015). “Thucydidean Stasis and the Roman Empire in Appian’s Interpretation of History,” in Welch, K. (ed.), Appian’s Roman History. Swansea, 45–63.Google Scholar
Pugliese Carratelli, G. (ed.) (1992). Roma e l’Egitto nell’Antichità Classica. Atti del I Congresso Internazionale Italo-Egiziano, Cairo 6–9 febbraio 1989. Rome.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1965). The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1979). Virgil’s Poem of the Earth. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1985). “Possessiveness, Sexuality and Heroism in the ‘Aeneid’,” Vergilius 31: 1–21.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1994). “Virgil’s Danaid Ekphrasis,” Illinois Classical Studies 19: 171–89.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1998). Virgil’s Epic Designs. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1999). “Aeneid 12: Unity in Closure,” in Perkell (1999): 10–30.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (2000). Horace’s Carmen Saeculare: Ritual Magic and the Poet’s Art. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (2008). “Italian Virgil and the Idea of Rome,” in Volk (2008): 138–60. Orig. publ. 1975.Google Scholar
Quartarone, L. (2011). “Quantity, Quality, Tension, and Transition: The Dimensions of Vergil’s ‘Ingens’,” Vergilius 57: 3–34.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993). Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (2011). “Virgil’s Double Cross,” American Journal of Philology 132/2: 273–300.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (2018). Virgil’s Double Cross: Design and Meaning in the Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Raditsa, L. F. (1980). “Augustus’ Legislation concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affairs and Adultery,” in Temporini, H. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. 2/13. Berlin, 278–339.Google Scholar
Rantala, J. (2013). Maintaining Loyalty, Declaring Continuity, Legitimizing Power: Ludi Saeculares of Septimius Severus as a Manifestation of the Golden Age. Tampere.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. (1954). Volk und Haus Gottes in Augustins Lehre von der Kirche. Munich.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. (1961 [1954]). “Herkunft und Sinn der Civitas-Lehre Augustins,” in Lammers, W. (ed.), Geschichtsdenken und Geschichtsbild im Mittelalter. Darmstadt, 55–74.Google Scholar
Rau, K. F. von, and Cronenthal, E. H. H. von (1826). Der Krieg der Verbündeten gegen Frankreich in den Jahren 1813, 1814, und 1815, vol. 2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Reckford, K. J. (1958). “Some Appearances of the Golden Age,” The Classical Journal 54: 79–87.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. (2007). Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. (2010). “Vergil’s Roman,” in Farrell and Putnam (2010): 66–79.Google Scholar
Rees, R. (ed.) (2012). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Latin Panegyric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reggiani, R. (2005). “Presenze femminili in Lucano,” in Varia Latina (satyrica-epica-tragica-historica). Amsterdam, 83–126.Google Scholar
Rehm, R. (1994). Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Renaut, A. (1999). Naissances de la modernité, vol. 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Rey, J.-M. (2008). Paul ou les ambiguïtés. Paris.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2008). The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century bc to the Second Century ad. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rieser, M. (2018). Zolas Naturalismus: Kreuzwege der Rougon-Macquart. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2013). “(En)closure and Rupture: Roman Poetry in the Arena,” in Grewing and Acosta-Hughes (2013): 103–27.Google Scholar
Rimell, V (2015). The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ritte, J. (2016). “Modernes Dandytum: Michel Houellebecqs Junggesellenroman Soumission,” Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 217–24.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989). The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (1996). “Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s Bellum Civile,” Classical Antiquity 15: 319–47.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2004). “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” Classical Philology 99: 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2009). “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture,” in Feldherr (2009): 214–30.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2018). Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Roloff, V. (2016). “Houellebecq und Huysmans: Soumission als Lektüreroman,” Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 210–16.Google Scholar
Rosa, G. (1974). “Massacrer les massacres,” L’Arc 57: 72–80.Google Scholar
Rosa, G. (1985). “Politique du désastre. Hugo durant ‘l’année terrible’,” Europe 671, March: 170–88.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, V. (1992). Bella et expeditiones: Die antike Terminologie der Kriege Roms. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2010). “Ab Urbe Condita: Roman History on the Shield of Aeneas,” in Breed, Damon, and Rossi (2010): 145–56.Google Scholar
Roulin, J.-M. (2001). “Mothers in Revolution: Political Representations of Maternity in Nineteenth-Century France,” Yale French Studies 101: 182–200.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York.Google Scholar
Salin, E. (1926). Civitas Dei. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Salzmann, M. R. (2013). “Memory and Meaning: Pagans and 410,” in Lipps, J., Machado, C., and von Rummel, P. (eds.), The Sack of Rome in 410 ad: The Event, Its Context and Its Impact. Wiesbaden, 295–310.Google Scholar
Salzmann, M. R. (2015). “Christian Sermons against Pagans: The Evidence from Augustine’s Sermons on the New Year and on the Sack of Rome in 410,” in Maas, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila. Cambridge, 344–57.Google Scholar
Sannicandro, L. (2010). I personaggi femminili del Bellum Civile di Lucano. Rahden.Google Scholar
Saylor, C. F. (1990). “Lux extrema: Lucan, Pharsalia 4.402–581,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 291–300.Google Scholar
Scepi, H. (2017).“La barricade renversée: empreintes hugoliennes dans l’Education sentimentale,” in Murphy (2017): 335–46.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1984). “La spartizione a Roma,” Studi Storici 4: 945–56.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (1990). Romulus et ses frères: le collège des frères Arvales, modèle du culte publique dans la Rome des empereurs. Rome.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (2003). An Introduction to Roman Religion. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1993). “Il destinatario nelle Georgiche,” in Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P., and Strauss Clay, J. (eds.), Mega Nepios: Il destinatario nell’epos didascalico. The Addressee in Didactic Epic, special issue. Materiali e discussioni 31: 129–47.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1997). “The Boundaries of Knowledge in Virgil’s Georgics,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1986). Caesar und Cleopatra: Philologischer und historischer Kommentar zu Lucan. 10,1–171. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. G. Schwab. Cambridge, MA. Orig. publ. 1922, revised 1934.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. (2011). “Roman Values in Velleius,” in Cowan, E. (ed.), Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea, 177–202.Google Scholar
Schneider, U. (2016). “‘Il n’y a pas de liberté sans une dose de provocation possible’: Michel Houellebecqs ‘Soumission’ oder: die Widerständigkeit der Fiktion,” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 67: 148–78.Google Scholar
Schober, R. (2002). “Renouveau du réalisme? ou De Zola à Houellebecq?,” in Gosselin-Noat, M. and Dufief, A.-S. (eds.), La représentation du réel dans le roman: Mélanges offerts à Colette Becker. Paris, 333–44.Google Scholar
Schönwälder, L. (2015). “Die Ästhetik des Bösen – Banalisierung des Bösen? Zur Funktion literarischer Provokation am Beispiel Michel Houellebecqs,” Romanische Forschungen 127: 29–51.Google Scholar
Schor, N. (2007). Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. New York.Google Scholar
Schrempp, O. (1964). Prophezeiung und Rückschau in Lucans “Bellum civile.” Winterthur.Google Scholar
Schuhen, G. (2007). Erotische Maskerade: Sexualität und Geschlecht bei Marcel Proust. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schürmann, R. (1996). Des hégémonies brisées. Paris.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. (2013). “The Philology of History. How and What Augustan Poetry Remembers: Horace, Vergil, and Propertius, 1.19, 1.22 and 2.13b,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 40–56.Google Scholar
Scodel, R., and Thomas, R. (1984). “Vergil and the Euphrates,” American Journal of Philology 105/3: 339.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (1989). “Homeric and Tragic Sacrifice,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 87–95.Google Scholar
Séginger, G. (2017). “Écriture historiographique et fiction romanesque”, in Murphy (2017): 279–93.Google Scholar
Seidel, M., and Landau, E. M. (1983). Altdorfer: Leidensweg, Heilsweg. Der Passionsaltar von Sankt Florian. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Seider, A. M. (2013). Memory in Vergil’s Aeneid: Creating the Past. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Selden, D. (1992). “Ceveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance,” in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York, 461–512.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. (2012). “Augustine and the Latin Classics,” in Vessey (2012): 161–74.Google Scholar
Siciliano, C. J. (1999). Labor and Justice: A Pattern of Allusions in Virgil’s Georgics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Siegert, B. (2006). “Ab-Ort Rom. Übertragung als Grund und Abgrund der Referenz,” in Seitter, W. and Vismann, C. (eds.), Tumult: Schriften zur Verkehrswissenschaft: Römisch, vol. 30. Zurich and Berlin, 11–18.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1984). “Rhamnusia Virgo,” Classical Antiquity 3/1: 134–41.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2003). Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Sklenár, R. (2003). The Taste for Nothingness: A Study of Virtus and Related Themes in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Slimani, L. (2016). Chanson douce. Paris.Google Scholar
Smethurst, S. E. (1950). “Women in Livy’s History,” Greece and Rome 19: 80–7.Google Scholar
Smil, V. (2010). Why America Is Not a New Rome. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Spence, S. (1991). “Cinching the Text: The Danaids and the End of the Aeneid,” Vergilius 37: 11–19.Google Scholar
Spence, S. (1999). “Varium et Mutabile: Voices of Authority in Aeneid 4,” in Perkell (1999): 80–95.Google Scholar
Spence, S., and Lowrie, M. (eds.) (2006). The Aesthetics of Empire and the Reception of Vergil. Literary Imagination 8/3.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. (2005). “Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-War Landscape,” Greece and Rome 52: 46–69.Google Scholar
Spieser-Landes, D. (2017). “Soumission ou simulacre de soumission? Michel Houellebecq et la métaphysique (Baudrillardienne) du radiateur,” French Cultural Studies 28/1: 42–53.Google Scholar
Spiller, R. (2004). “Sex, Lust and Depression: Michel Houellebecqs Kult elementarer Energien,” in Freiburg, R., May, M., et al. (eds.), Kultbücher. Würzburg, 201–21.Google Scholar
Spiquel, A. (2002). “La double guerre,” in Millet, C. and Rebérioux, M. (eds.), Hugo et la guerre. Paris, 227–47.Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1997). “Inefficacy, Error, and Failure: Galen on δόκιμα φάρμακα ἄπρακτα,” in Debru, A. (ed.), Galen on Pharmacology: Philosophy, History and Medicine. Leiden, 59–83.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) (1998). Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, P., and White, A. (1986). The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Star, C. (2021). Apocalypse and Golden Age: The End of the World in Greek and Roman Thought. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Starks, J. H., Jr. (1999). “Fides Aeneia: The Transference of Punic Stereotypes in the Aeneid,” The Classical Journal 94.3: 255–83.Google Scholar
Steigerwald, J., and Komorowska, A. (eds.) (2011). “Michel Houellebecq: questions du réalisme d’aujourd’hui,” lendemains 142/3: 6–17.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (2004). “Whose Rituals in Ink?”, in Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens (2004): 157–60.Google Scholar
Stock, B. (1996). Augustine the Reader: Meditation, Self-Knowledge, and the Ethics of Interpretation. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stover, T. (2008). “Cato and the Intended Scope of Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’,” Classical Quarterly 58/2: 571–80.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2017). “Roman Ideas on the Loose,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 141–51.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G. (2012). “Augustine and Books,” in Vessey (2012): 151–7.Google Scholar
Stump, E., and Kretzman, N. (eds.) (2001). The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Syed, Y. (2005). Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tauber, C. (2016). “Neue Identitäten ‒ neue Genealogien: Jacques-Louis Davids künstlerische Selbstdarstellung nach dem 9. Thermidor 1794,” Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 79/3: 331–64.Google Scholar
Testard, M. (1958). Saint Augustin et Cicéron. Paris.Google Scholar
Thirouin, L. (1998). “La condamnation morale du théâtre: l’autorité morale de saint Augustin,” in Jehasse and McKenna (1998): 275–96.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982a). “Catullus and the Poetics of Reference (Poem 64.1–18),” American Journal of Philology 103: 144–64.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982b). Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, vol. 7., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1990). “Ideology, Influence, and Future Studies in the ‘Georgics’,” Vergilius 36: 64–73.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1991). “The ‘Sacrifice’ at the End of the Georgics, Aristaeus, and Vergilian Closure,” Classical Philology 86/3: 211–18.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1998). “The Isolation of Turnus,” in Stahl (1998): 271–302.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2000). “A Trope by Any Other Name: ‘Polysemy,’ Ambiguity, and Significatio in Virgil,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 381–407.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001). Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (1981). “Parricidium i. Le père, la famille et la cité,” Mélanges des écoles françaises de Rome et d’Athènes 93: 643–715.Google Scholar
Thraede, K. (1983). “Gottesstaat (Civitas Dei),” in T. Klauser et al. (eds.), Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, vol. 12. Stuttgart, 58–82.Google Scholar
Todd, E. (2015). Qui est Charlie? Sociologie d’une crise religieuse. Paris.Google Scholar
Toll, K. (1997). “Making Roman-ness in the Aeneid,” Classical Antiquity 16: 34–56.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. M. V. (2012). “And to End on a Poetic Note: Galen’s Authorial Strategies in the Pharmacological Books,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 307–15.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. (2014). Lucan’s Egyptian Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991). Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trump, D., with Schwartz, T. (1987). The Art of the Deal. New York.Google Scholar
Trüstedt, K. (2018). “Fortress Europe,” in 3 Quarks Daily: Science, Arts, Philosophy, Politics, Literature, June 18: www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2018/06/fortress-europe.html.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. A. (1975). “The Banquets of Dido and Cleopatra,” Classical Bulletin 52: 17–20.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. A. (1990). “Love in Lucan’s Civil War,” Classical Bulletin 66: 43–6.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. (2005). “Echoes of Lucan in Tacitus: The Cohortationes of Pompey and Calgacus,” in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 12. Brussels, 395–413.Google Scholar
Ubl, R. (2010). “Eugène Delacroix. Mit dem Meer malen,” inBaader, H. and Wolf, G. (eds.), Das Meer, der Tausch, und die Grenzen der Repräsentation. Zurich, 95–122.Google Scholar
Uden, J. (2015). The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ungelenk, J. (2018). Literature and Weather: Shakespeare – Goethe – Zola. Berlin.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1967). M. Annaei Lucani Commenta Bernensia. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Van Fleteren, F. (2001). “Principles of Augustine’s Hermeneutics: An Overview,” in Van Fleteren and Schnaubelt (2001): 1–32.Google Scholar
Van Fleteren, F., and Schnaubelt, J. C. (eds.) (2001). Augustine: Biblical Exegete. New York.Google Scholar
Veeser, H. A. (1994). The New Historicism Reader. New York.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. (2005). “Reading like Angels,” in Caputo and Scanlon (2005): 159–211.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. (ed.) (2012). A Companion to Augustine. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Viard, B. (2010). “Les enjeux idéologiques de l’œuvre romanesque de Michel Houellebecq,” in Bowd (2010): 171–84.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (1991a). Unentrinnbare Neugierde: Die Weltverfallenheit des Romans. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (1991b). “Zeichenspur, Wortlaut: Paris als Gedächtnisraum. Hugos A l’Arc de Triomphe, Baudelaires Le Cygne,” in Haverkamp, A. and Lachmann, R. (eds.), Gedächtniskunst: Raum – Bild – Schrift. Studien zur Mnemotechnik. Frankfurt, 231–62.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (1992a). Der Ursprung der Ästhetik aus theologischem Vorbehalt: Theorien des Ästhetischen von Port-Royal bis Rousseau und Sade. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (1992b). “The Concept of Passion and the Dangers of the Theater. Un esthétique avant la lettre: Augustine and Port-Royal,” Romanic Review 83/1: 45–59.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (1993). “Alle Menschen werden Brüder: Republik, Rhetorik, Differenz der Geschlechter,” Lendemains 71/2: 112–24.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2001). Du Bellay und Petrarca. Das Rom der Renaissance. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2004). “Via crucis, via amoris,” in Menke, B. and Vinken, B. (eds.), Stigmata. Poetiken der Körperinschrift. Munich, 11–23.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2006). “Forget Virgil? Baudelaire and the Truth of Modernity,” in Spence and Lowrie (2006): 417–40.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2007). “Wounds of Love: Modern Devotion according to Michelet,” Clio 36/2: 155–75.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2009a). Flaubert: Durchkreuzte Moderne. Frankfurt; trans. A. Rommens with S. L. Solomon, Flaubert Postsecular: Modernity Crossed Out (2015), Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2009b). “Blutopfer: Franz Marcs Geheimes Europa und Flauberts Heiliger Julian, Schlächter wider den Herrn,” in exhibition catalog Der große Widerspruch. Franz Marc zwischen Delaunay und Rousseau, Franz Marc Museum, Kochel am See. Munich: 65–74.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2011). Bestien: Kleist und die Deutschen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2013). “Eine etwas andere translatio Romae,” in Voigt, K. (ed.), Unter vier Augen: Sprachen des Porträts. Bielefeld, 182–9.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2014a) Angezogen: Das Geheimnis der Mode. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2014b). “Effekte des Realen: Bildmedien und Literatur im Realismus (G. Flaubert: L’Éducation sentimentale),” in Benthien, C. and Weingart, B (eds.), Handbuch Literatur & Visuelle Kultur. Berlin, 393–407.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2015a). “Nana: Venus à Rebours,” in Goth, S., Berressem, H., and Blamberger, G. (eds.), Venus as Muse: From Lucretius to Michel Serres. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (ed.) (2015b). Translatio Babylonis: Unsere orientalische Moderne. Munich.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2015c). “Götzendienst (Émile Zola),” in Kasper and Wild (2015): 60–5.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2016a). “‘Schlusen.’ Effi Briest und ‘die rechte Liebe’,” in Haselstein, U. (ed.), Allegorie. DFG-Symposion 2014. Berlin, 499–527.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2016b). “Das Vierte Reich: Houellebecq und Europas innerer Orient,” Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 10/3: 53–68.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (ed.) (2019). Gustave Flaubert, Trois contes, nouvelle édition critique de Barbara Vinken, avec trois essais. Berlin.Google Scholar
Vinken, B. (2020). Bel Ami: In diesem Babylon leben wir immer noch. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (ed.) (2008). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Vergil’s Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wahnich, S. (2002). “De l’économie émotive de la Terreur,” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 57/4: 889–913.Google Scholar
Walker, W. (2009). Paradise Lost and Republican Tradition from Aristotle to Machiavelli. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1981). “The Emperor and His Virtues,” Historia 30/3: 298–323.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008). Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1997). “Mémoire et imagination: le limites de l’enargeia dans la théorie rhétorique poétique,” in Lévy, G. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’évidence (philosophie et rhétorique antiques), Cahiers de philosophie de l’Université de Paris XII–Val de Marne, 2. Paris, 229–47.Google Scholar
Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago.Google Scholar
Wedeen, L. (2019). Authoritarian Apprehensions: Ideology, Judgement, and Mourning in Syria. Chicago.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. (1971). Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Weiser, J. (2013). “Der Autor im Kulturbetrieb: literarisches Self-Fashioning zwischen Selbstvermarktung und Vermarktungsreflexionen (Christine Angot, Frédéric Beigbeder, Michel Houellebecq,” Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 123/3: 225–50.Google Scholar
Weiskel, T. (1976). The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Weithman, P. (2014). “Augustine’s Political Philosophy,” in Meconi and Stump (2014): 231–50.Google Scholar
Weitzmann, M. (2015). “Toxicité de Houellebecq”, Le Monde, January 6, 2015.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (ed.) (2015). Appian’s Roman History: Empire and Civil War. Swansea.Google Scholar
Westra, H. J. (2007). “Augustine and Poetic Exegesis,” in Otten and Pollmann (2007): 11–28.Google Scholar
White, D. E. (2008). “Untimely Revolutions: Victor Hugo and the Spectre of the Date,” Romance Studies 26/2: 111–25.Google Scholar
White, R. (2008). Radical Virtues: Moral Wisdom and the Ethics of Contemporary Life. New York.Google Scholar
Whittaker, T. (2009). “Sex and the Sack of the City,” Greece and Rome 56: 234–42.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1963). Golden Latin Artistry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1969). The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1997). “The Analogy of City and Soul in Plato’s Republic,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), Plato’s Republic: Critical Essays. New York.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1995). Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2010). “The Two-Headed State: How Romans Explained Civil War,” in Breed, Damon, and Rossi (2010): 25–44.Google Scholar
Wodianka, S. (2018). “Sommes-nous François? Literatur und Vanitas bei Michel Houellebecq,”Paragrana 27/2: 291–312.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1983). “From Hannibal to Hitler: The Literature of War,” University of Leeds Review 26: 107–24.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1992). “Augustan Cleopatras: Female Power and Poetic Authority,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London, 98–140.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1997). Projecting the Past: Ancient Rome, Cinema and History. London.Google Scholar
Xuan, J. (2015). “Ergebung/Erneuerung: Zur Anerkennungsdialektik in Michel Houllebecqs Soumission,” Philologie im Netz 73: 119–31.Google Scholar
Yelle, M. (2019a). Sovereignty and the Sacred: Secularism and the Political Economy of Religion, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yelle, M. (2019b). “From Sovereignty to Solidarity: Some Transformations in the Politics of Sacrifice from the Reformation to Robertson Smith,” History of Religions 58/3: 319–46.Google Scholar
Zadro, C. (2007). Gli obelischi di Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988). The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, MI; transl. (2003), Augustus und die Macht der Bilder, Munich.Google Scholar
Zard, P. (2009). “Raison historique, apocalypse et roman familial dans Quatrevingt-treize (Hugo) et Le Siècle des lumières (Carpentier),” Revue de littèrature comparée 329/83: 25–39.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1965). “The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 96: 463–508.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, T. (1993). Virgil and the Moderns. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Zollinger, E. (2015). “Monument (Joachim Du Bellay),” in Kasper and Wild (2015): 120–5.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1974). “Caesar und Kleopatra bei Lucan und späterer Dichtung,” Antike und Abendland 20: 54–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Michèle Lowrie, University of Chicago, Barbara Vinken, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Civil War and the Collapse of the Social Bond
  • Online publication: 06 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029995.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Michèle Lowrie, University of Chicago, Barbara Vinken, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Civil War and the Collapse of the Social Bond
  • Online publication: 06 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029995.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Michèle Lowrie, University of Chicago, Barbara Vinken, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
  • Book: Civil War and the Collapse of the Social Bond
  • Online publication: 06 October 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029995.009
Available formats
×