Book contents
- CICERO’S DE FINIBUS
- Cicero’s De Finibus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s sceptical methods
- Chapter 2 Epicurean pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus
- Chapter 3 Cicero and Epicurean virtues (De Finibus 1–2)
- Chapter 4 Epicurus on the importance of friendship in the good life (De Finibus 1.65–70; 2.78–85)
- Chapter 5 Honor and the honorable
- Chapter 6 The voice of nature
- Chapter 7 Sententia explosa
- Chapter 8 Structure, standards and Stoic moral progress in De Finibus 4
- Chapter 9 Antiochus’ theory of oikeiōsis
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Index locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- CICERO’S DE FINIBUS
- Cicero’s De Finibus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Cicero’s sceptical methods
- Chapter 2 Epicurean pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus
- Chapter 3 Cicero and Epicurean virtues (De Finibus 1–2)
- Chapter 4 Epicurus on the importance of friendship in the good life (De Finibus 1.65–70; 2.78–85)
- Chapter 5 Honor and the honorable
- Chapter 6 The voice of nature
- Chapter 7 Sententia explosa
- Chapter 8 Structure, standards and Stoic moral progress in De Finibus 4
- Chapter 9 Antiochus’ theory of oikeiōsis
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cicero's De FinibusPhilosophical Approaches, pp. 248 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Algra, K. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: The Ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (eds.): 107–139.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2003) ‘The Mechanism of Social Appropriation and Its Role in Hellenistic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (2007) Conceptions and Images: Hellenistic Philosophical Theology and Traditional Religion. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic Probabilism and Stoic Epistemology’, Classical Quarterly 44: 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1995) ‘Aristotelian Political Theory in the Hellenistic Period’, in Laks and Schofield (eds.): 74–94.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007a) ‘Carneades’ Classification of Ethical Theories’, in Ioppolo and Sedley (eds.): 187–223.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (ed.) and Woolf, R. (tr.) (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (2000), ‘Cicero’, in Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: 477–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, S. (2006) ‘Recherches sur la rhétorique des Stoïciens à Rome, de ses origines grecques jusquà la fin de la République.’ Dissertation, Sorbonne University, Paris.Google Scholar
Aubert, S. (2008) ‘Cicéron et la parole stoïcienne: polémiques autour de la dialectique’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57.1: 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, S. (forthcoming) ‘De la phronêsis à la prudentia’, Interférences.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 51–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) ‘Roman Aristotle’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata ii: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, R. (2003) ‘A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 303–340.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1986) ‘Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2004) ‘Compte-rendu de Plutarque, Sur les notions communes contre les stoïciens, texte établi par M. Casevitz, traduit et commenté par D. Babut’, Philosophie Antique 4: 220–224.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) ‘Le débat entre stoïcisme et platonisme à propos de la vie scolastique: Chrysippe, l’Ancienne Académie, Antiochus’, in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, Ch. (eds.), Stoic Platonism – Platonic Stoicism. Leuven: 1–20.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2009) ‘Theōria et vie contemplative du Stoïcisme au Platonisme: Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus et Alcinoos’, in Bonazzi and Opsomer (eds.): 3–31.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1989) ‘Carneades’ Pithanon: A Reappraisal of Its Role and Status’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 7: 59–94.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1990) ‘Carneades’ Distinction between Assent and Approval’, Monist 73.1: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2006) ‘Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy’, in Reis, B. (ed.), Virtue in Greek Ethics. Cambridge: 206–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, M. (2009) ‘Does Cosmic Nature Matter?’ in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009) ‘Antiochus’ Ethics and the Subordination of Stoicism’, in Bonazzi and Opsomer (eds.): 33–54.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.) (2009) The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1936) ‘Les méthodes de l’histoire littéraire: Cicéron et son œuvre philosophique’, Revue des études latines 14: 288–309. Reprinted in Boyancé, P. (1970), Etudes sur l’humanisme cicéronien. Brussels: 199–221.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2012) ‘The Nature and Object of the Spirited Part of the Soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge: 102–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. (2002) ‘Epicurus on the Value of Friendship (Sententia Vaticana xxiii)’, Classical Philology 97: 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. (2009) ‘Politics and Society’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Á. (2011) ‘Totas paginas commovere? Cicero’s Presentation of Stoic Ethics in De Finibus Book iii.’ Dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield and Striker (eds.): 113–144.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) (1993) Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) (2002) Le style de la pensée: Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1980) ‘Aristotle on Friendship’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 301–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (1984) ‘Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation’, Journal of Philosophy 74: 713–730. Reprinted in Cooper (1999b): 118–134.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1996) ‘Eudaimonism, the Appeal to Nature, and “Moral Duty” in Stoicism’, in Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J. (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics. New York: 261–284. Reprinted in Cooper (1999b): 427–448.Google Scholar
Dalfino, M. C. (1993) ‘Ieronimo di Rodi: la dottrina della vacuitas doloris’, Elenchos 14: 277–303.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1969) ‘Limit and Variation in Epicurean Philosophy’, Phoenix 23: 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1997) The Great Tradition: Further Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (2003) The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 bc). Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) ‘Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 197–218.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. (1998) ‘Cicero the Dramaturge: Verisimilitude and Consistency of Characterization in Some of His Dialogues’, in Schmeling, G. and Mikalson, J. D. (eds.) Qui miscuit utile dulci: Festschrift essays for Paul Lachlan MacKendrick. Wauconda, IL: 151–164.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1986) ‘Discovering the Good: oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics’, in Schofield and Striker (eds.): 145–183.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1999) ‘Epicurean Ethics’ in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 642–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, M. and Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Epicurean Ethics’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 642–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. (2004) ‘Can Epicureans Be Friends?’ Ancient Philosophy 24.2: 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. (2004) Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2001) ‘Réponse à Carlos Lévy’, in Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.), Cicéron et Philodème. La polémique en philosophie. Paris: 77–84.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (2011) Theophrastus of Eresus, Commentary, vol. vi.1. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.) (1989) Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. New Brunswick, NJ, and London.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S. A. (eds.) (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation and Discussion. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities xii. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2000) ‘Dialogue and Irony in Cicero: Reading De Republica’, in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relation. Oxford: 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1987c) ‘The Skeptic’s Two Kinds of Assent and the Question of the Possibility of Knowledge’, in Frede (1987a): 200–222.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) ‘On the Stoic Conception of the Good’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford and New York: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawlick, G. and Görler, W. (1994) ‘Cicero’, in Flashar, H. (ed.), Die Philosophie der Antike, vol. iv.2: Die Hellenistische Philosophie. Basel: 991–1168.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1990) ‘The Human Being as an Ethical Norm’, in Gill, C. (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Oxford: 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (2012) ‘The Transformation of Aristotle’s Ethics in Roman Philosophy’, in Miller, J. (ed.), The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics. Cambridge: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusta, M. (1990) ‘Antiocho di Ascalona e Carneade nel libro v del De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum di Cicerone’, Elenchos 11: 29–49.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s Philosophical Affiliations’, in Dillon, J. and Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of Eclecticism. Berkeley: 34–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) ‘Probabile, veri simile, and Related Terms’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 115–143.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1984) ‘Zum “Virtus”-Fragment des Lucilius (1336–1338 Marx) und zur Geschichte der stoischen Güterlehre’, Hermes 112: 445–468. Reprinted in Görler (2004a): 105–135.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1989) ‘Cicero und die “Schule des Aristoteles”’, in Fortenbaugh and Steinmetz (eds.): 246–263.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1990) ‘Antiochos von Askalon über die “Alten” und über die Stoa. Beobachtungen zu Cicero, Academici posteriores i 24–43’, in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Beiträge zur hellenistischen Literatur und ihrer Rezeption in Rom. Stuttgart: 122–139. Reprinted in Görler (2004a): 87–104.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1994) ‘Älterer Pyrrhonismus, Jüngere Akademie, Antiochus aus Askalon’, in Flashar, H. (ed.), Die Philosophie der Antike, 4: Die hellenistische Philosophie. Basel: 717–989.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the Troublemaker: De Legibus i. 39 and the Continuity of Cicero’s Scepticism’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 85–113.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1997) ‘Cicero’s Philosophical Stance in the Lucullus’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (eds.): 36–57.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2004b) ‘Zum literarischen Charakter und zur Struktur der Tusculanae Disputationes’, in Görler (2004a): 212–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, W. (2011) ‘Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, Buch 5. Beobachtungen zur Quelle und zum Aufbau’, Elenchos 32.2: 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2008) ‘Les éclipses de la phronèsis dans le stoïcisme de Cléanthe à Marc Aurèle’, in Lories, D. and Rizzerio, L. (eds.), Le jugement pratique: Autour de la notion de phronèsis. Paris: 167–197.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2012) ‘Cicero and the Perverse: The Origins of Error in De legibus 1 and Tusculan disputations 3’, in Nicgorski (ed.): 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) ‘Philosophical Badinage in Cicero’s Letters to His Friends’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 325–346.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (2007) ‘Critolaus and the Hellenistic Peripatetic Philosophy’, in Ioppolo and Sedley (eds.): 47–102.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1877–1883) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophischen Schriften, 3 vols. Leipzig. Reprinted Hildesheim and New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1986) ‘Epicurus: hedonist malgré lui’, in Schofield and Striker (eds.): 245–263.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, W. M. L. (ed.) (1909) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri Quinque. London.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1983) ‘The Two Forms of oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa (Comments on Professor Görgemann’s Paper)’, in Fortenbaugh (ed.): 190–201.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1990) ‘Rhetorica Disputatio: the strategy of De Finibus ii’, in M. Nussbaum (ed.), The Poetics of Therapy (= Apeiron 23.4): 143–164.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. and Donini, P. (1999) ‘Stoic Ethics’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 675–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. (1988) Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.) (1997) Assent and Argument. Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. (2000) ‘Decreta e praecepta in Seneca’, in Brancacci, A. (ed.), La filosofia in età imperiale: le scuole e le tradizioni filosofiche. Naples: 15–36.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. (2012a) ‘Chrysippus and the Action Theory of Aristo of Chios’, in Kamtekar, R. (ed.), Virtue and Happiness: Essays in Honour of Julia Annas, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Supplementary Volume. Oxford: 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. (2012b) ‘Il concetto di piacere nella filosofia di Aristone di Chio’, Elenchos 33, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (2007) Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 bc. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1998) ‘Socratic Paradox and Stoic Theory’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Ethics. Companions to Ancient Thought 4. Cambridge: 151–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T. (2012) ‘Antiochus, Aristotle and the Stoics on Degrees of Happiness’, in Sedley (ed.): 151–172.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2005) Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (2006) ‘Epicurean “Passions” and the Good Life’, in Reis, B. (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge: 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. (1993) ‘Annicéris et les plaisirs psychiques: quelques préalables doxographiques’, in Brunschwig and Nussbaum (eds.): 18–49.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R. (2008) ‘“Reading for the Moral” in Valerius Maximus: The Case of severitas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, A. (1963) ‘The Styles of Philosophical Writing in the Republic’, in Leeman, A., Orationis Ratio. Amsterdam: 198–216.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, J. (1999) ‘Die Bestimmung des probabile im philosophischen Spätwerk’, in Leonhardt, J., Ciceros Kritik der Philosophenschulen. Munich: 13–88.Google Scholar
Levine, P. (1958) ‘Cicero and the Literary Dialogue’, Classical Journal 53.4: 146–151.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1980) ‘Un problème doxographique chez Cicéron: les indifférentistes’, Revue des études latines 58: 244–245.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) ‘La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres ii et iv du De Finibus’, Revue des études latines 62: 111–127.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus. Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2001) ‘Cicéron et l’épicurisme: la problématique de l’éloge paradoxal’, in Assayas-Auvray, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.), Cicéron et Philodème. La polémique en philosophie. Paris: 61–75.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1977) ‘The Early Stoic Concept of Moral Choice’, in Bossier, F. et al. (eds.), Images of Man in Ancient and Mediaeval Thought. Symbolae Facultatis Litterarum et Philosophiae Lovaniensis, Series A. Leuven: vol. i: 79–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986) ‘Pleasure and Social Utility – the Virtues of Being Epicurean’, in Flashar, H. and Gigon, O. (eds.), Aspects de la philosophie hellenistique. Entretiens Hardt 32. Geneva: 286–324. Reprinted in Long (2006a): 178–201.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1991) ‘The Harmonics of Stoic Virtue’, in Blumenthal, H. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 1991. Oxford: 97–116.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995a) ‘Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis’, in Laks and Schofield (eds.): 214–240.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995b) ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006b) ‘Lucretius on Nature and the Epicurean Self’, in Long (2006a): 202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006c) ‘Hellenistic Ethics as the Art of Life’, in Long (2006a): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Bastianini, G. (1992) ‘Hierocles: Elementa Moralia’ in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, part i vol. i. Florence: 268–451.Google Scholar
Lörcher, A. (1911) Das Fremde und das Eigene in Ciceros Büchern De Finibus bonorum et malorum und den Academica. Halle.Google Scholar
Madvig, I. N. (1876 [1839]) De Finibus bonorum et malorum libri quinque. Hanse. Copenhagen, 1876; Hildesheim, 1965.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1999) ‘Sources’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 3–30.Google Scholar
Martha, J. (ed. and tr.) (1928) Cicéron, Des termes extrêmes des biens et des maux. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (ed.) (1986) ‘Philon von Larissa und Antiochos von Askalon’, Lustrum 28: 9–63.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988) Epicurus’ Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (ed.) (2005) M. Tullius Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
O’Connor, D. K. (1989) ‘The Invulnerable Pleasures of Epicurean Friendship’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30: 165–186.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (2002) ‘The Cyrenaics on Pleasure, Happiness, and Future-Concern’, Phronesis 47.4: 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzig, G. (1979) ‘Cicero als Philosoph, am Beispiel der Schrift “De Finibus”’, Gymnasium 86: 304–322.Google Scholar
Pease, A. (1914) ‘The Conclusion of Cicero’s De Natura Deorum’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 44: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, T. and Rowe, C. (2005) Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge Studies in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1939) ‘Die Philosophischen Schriften’, in Gelzer, M. (ed.), M. Tullius Cicero. RE 7.A.1: 1104–1192.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1995b) ‘Introduction: Cicero’s Philosophical Works and Their Background’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1995c) ‘Cicero’s Translations from Greek’, in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prost, F. (2001) ‘L’éthique d’Antiochus d’Ascalon’, Philologus 145.2: 244–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prost, F. (2003) ‘Aspects de la critique cicéronienne de l’épicurisme en De Finibus 2’, Quaderni del dipertimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica. Università degli studi di Torino 2: 87–111.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (ed.) (1925) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri i, ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2002) ‘Human Bonding and Oikeiôsis in Roman Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 221–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) (1998) M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri Quinque. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ruch, M. (1969) ‘La disputatio in utramque partem dans le Lucullus et ses fondements philosophiques’, Revue des études latines 47: 310–335.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The Syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28.1: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986) ‘Cicero for and against Divination’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) ‘Two Stoic Approaches to Justice’, in Laks and Schofield (eds.): 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Epilogismos: An Appraisal’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Social and Political Thought’, in Algra, K, Barnes, J, Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 739–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) ‘Cicero, Zeno of Citium and the Vocabulary of Philosophy’, in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin (eds.): 412–428.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2009a) ‘Ciceronian Dialogue’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2009b) ‘Republican Virtues’, in Balot, R. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012b) ‘The Neutralizing Argument: Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’, in Sedley (ed.): 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge and Paris.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics’, in Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M (eds.) Epicureismo greco e romano. Naples: 313–339.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) ‘The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Ethics. Companions to Ancient Thought 4. Cambridge: 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2002) ‘Diogenes of Oinoanda on Cyrenaic Hedonism’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 48: 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) (1965–1970) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus, 5 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement to ‘On the Soul’, trans., with introduction and notes. London.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2007) ‘Peripatetics on Happiness’, in Sharples and Sorabji (eds.): vol. ii: 627–637.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2010) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 bc to ad 200: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. and Sorabji, R. (eds.) (2007) Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 bc–200 ad, 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94. London.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1995) ‘‘‘A self-indulgent misuse of leisure and writing?” How Not to Write Philosophy. Did Cicero Get it Right?’ in Powell (ed.) (1995a): 301–323.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2012) ‘Sextus Empiricus et l’ombre longue d’Aristote’, Philosophie Antique 12: 281–288.Google Scholar
Splawn, C. (2002) ‘Updating Epicurus’s Concept of Katastematic Pleasure’, Journal of Value Inquiry 36: 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, C. (2005) Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical Strategies’, in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford: 54–83. Reprinted in Striker (1996): 92–115.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1983) ‘The Role of Oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 145–167. Reprinted in Striker (1996): 281–297.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1991) ‘Following Nature: A Study in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 1–73. Reprinted in Striker (1996): 221–280.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1993) ‘Epicurean Hedonism’, in Brunschwig and Nussbaum (eds.) (1993): 3–17. Reprinted in Striker 1996: 196–208.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1995) ‘Cicero and Greek Philosophy’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, F. A. (1941) ‘Cicero and gloria’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 72: 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süss, W. (1966) Cicero: eine Einführung in seine philosophischen Schriften (mit Anschluss der staatsphilosophischen Werke). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Thiaucourt, C. (1885) Essai sur les traités philosophiques de Cicéron et leurs sources grecques. Paris.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2002) ‘Is There an Exception to Greek Eudaimonism?’ in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin (eds.): 464–489.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2010) ‘Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics.’ Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2012) ‘Antiochus on Contemplation and the Happy Life’, in Sedley (ed.): 131–150.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vander Waerdt, P. A. (1987) ‘The Justice of the Epicurean Wise Man’, Classical Quarterly 37.2: 402–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994) ‘Socrates and Stoic Natural Law’, in P. A. Waerdt, vander (ed.) The Socratic Movement. Ithaca, NY: 272–308.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds.) (1958) Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium, 5 vols. Berlin. Firsts published 1884–1912.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2000) ‘Epicurean Immortality’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18: 231–261.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus and the Pleasures of the Future’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 135–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2002) Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2007) ‘L’ethique’, in Gigandet, A. and Morel, P.-M. (eds.) Lire Épicure et les épicuriens. Paris: 117–143.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2009) ‘Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36: 249–281.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2013) ‘The Harm of Death in Cicero’s First Tusculan Disputation’, in Taylor, J. S. (ed.), The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death. Oxford: 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N. (1979) ‘The Basis of Stoic Ethics’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83: 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (2002) ‘Happiness in the Hellenistic Lyceum’, in Jost, L. and Shiner, R. A. (eds.), Eudaimonia and Well-Being: Ancient and Modern Conceptions (first published as Apeiron 35). Kelowna, British Columbia: 69–93.Google Scholar
White, S. (2004) ‘Lyco and Hieronymus on the Good Life’, in Fortenbaugh and White (eds.): 389–409.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2009) ‘Epicurus on εὐφροσύνη and ἐνέργεια (DL 10.136)’, Apeiron 42.3: 221–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, R. (2004) ‘What Kind of Hedonist Was Epicurus?’ Phronesis 49.4: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F.(2014) ‘Learned and Wise: Cotta the Sceptic in Cicero’s De Natura Deorum’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 245–273.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. (1962) Cicero Platonis aemulus. Untersuchungen über die Form von Ciceros Dialogen, besonders von De oratore. Zürich.Google Scholar