Politics

Kathryn Tanner

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803499.006

5 - Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Kathryn Tanner

Show author details

Kathryn Tanner: Affiliation:
University of Chicago Divinity School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

When contemporary theologians want to form judgments about social and political matters they often turn immediately to the trinity for guidance. Rather than Christology, a theology of the trinity is enlisted to support particular kinds of human community – say, egalitarian, inclusive communities, in which differences are respected – or to counter modern individualism by greater regard for the way personal character is shaped in community. What the trinity is like is thought to establish how human societies should be organized; the trinity is taken to be the best indicator of the proper relationship between individual and community; and so on. Jürgen Moltmann, John Zizioulas, Miroslav Volf, Leonardo Boff, and Catherine LaCugna are all important names in this regard.

Theological judgments here can seem very easy and clear-cut. For example, if the persons of the trinity are equal to one another, then human beings should be too. Figuring out the socio-political lessons of the trinity is a fraught task, however. This chapter systematically explores the complexities and perils of the attempt, and concludes it would be better to steer attention away from trinitarian relations when making judgments about the proper character of human ones in Christian terms. Christology (specifically, a discussion of the character of Jesus' relationships with other people) is the better avenue for making such judgments: it is less misleading, far simpler, and much more direct.

This could seem an unexpected turn on my part.

Type: Chapter
Information: Christ the Key , pp. 207 - 246

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803499.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moltmann, Jürgen, The Trinity and the Kingdom, trans. Kohl, Margaret (New York: HarperCollins, 1991); Zizioulas, John, Being as Communion (Crestwood, NewYork: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1993);Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav, “‘The Trinity is our Social Program:’ The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Shape of Social Engagement,” Modern Theology 14/3 (1998), pp. 403–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Boff, Leonardo, Trinity and Society, trans. Burns, Paul (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis, 1988)Google Scholar

LaCugna, Catherine, God For Us (New York: HarperCollins, 1991).Google Scholar

Peterson, ErikDer Monotheismus als Politisches Problem (Leipzig: Jakob Hegner, 1935); Moltmann, Trinity and the Kingdom, pp. 192–202; Boff, Trinity and Society, pp. 20–4.Google Scholar

Assman, JanPolitsche Theologie zwischen Ägypten und Israel (Munich: Siemens, 1992), pp. 75–6. The problematic implication of the latter move is, however, a privileging of the whole nation over others, e.g., the Canaanites.Google Scholar

,Eusebius of Caesarea, “Oration in Praise of the Emperor Constantine,” trans. Richardson, E. in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. i (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1890).Google Scholar

Prestige, G. L.God in Patristic Thought (London: SPCK, 1952), pp. 102–3, 157–9, 168, 173, 213–15, 229–30, 234–5.Google Scholar

,Athanasius, “Four Discourses against the Arians,” trans. Newman, John Henry and Robertson, Archibald, in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. iv, Second Series (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1957)Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs, Theo-Drama, vol. iii (Dramatis Personae), trans. Harrison, Graham (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1992), pp. 183–91;Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph, Introduction to Christianity (London: Burns & Oates, 1969), pp. 132–5.Google Scholar

,Gregory of Nyssa, Commentary on the Song of Songs, trans. McCambley, Casimir (Brookline, Massachusetts: Hellenic College Press, 1987), Seventh Homily, p. 145.Google Scholar

Harrison, Verna, “Male and Female in Cappadocian Theology,” Journal of Theological Studies 41 (1990), p. 441.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Athanasius, “Defence of the Nicene Definition,” trans. Newman, John Henry, in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. iv, Second Series (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1957)Google Scholar

Nazienzen, Gregory, “Orations,” trans. Browne, Charles G. and Swallow, James E., in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. vii, Second Series (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1983)Google Scholar

,Gregory of Nyssa, “Answer to Eunomius' Second Book,” trans. Day, M., in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. v, Second Series (Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson, 1994), p. 252.Google Scholar

,Gregory of Nyssa, “Against Eunomius,” trans. Moore, William and Wilson, H. A., in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. v, Second Series (Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson, 1994)Google Scholar

,Hilary of Poitiers, “On the Trinity,” trans. Watson, E. W. and Pullan, L., in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. ix, Second Series (Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson, 1994)Google Scholar

Soskice, Janet Martin, “Trinity and Feminism,” in Parsons, Susan Frank (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology (Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 146.Google Scholar

Harvey, Susan Ashbrook“Feminine Imagery for the Divine: the Holy Spirit, the Odes of Solomon, and Early Syrian Tradition,”St. Vladimir's Theological Quarterly 37/2–3 (1993), p. 114.Google Scholar

Burrus, Virginia, “Begotten Not Made” (Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav, Exclusion and Embrace (Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon, 1996), p. 187.Google Scholar

Segal, Alan, Two Powers in Heaven (Leiden: Brill, 1977).Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav, After our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1998), p. 209:Google Scholar

Moltmann, , “Theological Proposals towards a Resolution of the Filioque Controversy,” in Vischer, Lukas (ed.), Spirit of God, Spirit of Christ (London: SPCK, 1981), pp. 164–73.Google Scholar

,Augustine, “On the Trinity,” trans. Haddan, Arthur West and Shedd, William, in Schaff, Philip (ed.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. iii (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1956), p. 92.Google Scholar

Kilby, Karen, “Perichoresis and Projection,” Blackfriars 81 (2000), p. 442.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas, Does God Suffer? (University of Notre Dame Press, 2000), pp. 115, 119, 128, 134–5, 140, 207–8.Google Scholar

Emery, Giles, “Essentialism or Personalism in the Treatise on God in Saint Thomas Aquinas?,”Thomist 64 (2000), pp. 551–3.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Athanasius, The Letters of St. Athanasius concerning the Holy Spirit, trans. Shapland, C. R. B. (London: Epworth, 1951), Epistle 4, pp. 187–8.Google Scholar

Tanner, Kathryn, Economy of Grace (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress, 2005), chapter 3.Google Scholar

Fiddes, Paul, Participating in God (Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox, 2000)Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard, “Jürgen Moltmann's The Trinity and the Kingdom of God and the Question of Pluralism,” in Vanhoozer, Kevin (ed.), The Trinity in a Pluralistic Age (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1997), pp. 160Google Scholar

McFadyen, Alistair, “The Trinity and Human Individuality,”Theology 95 (1992), pp. 12–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

,Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John 55–111, trans. Rettig, John, Fathers of the Church Series (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Book contents

5 - Politics

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive