Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Preface
- Cambridge Cultural Social Studies
- 1 Setting the scene
- 2 The changing environmental contexts of China's first complex societies
- 3 Household subsistence and ritual
- 4 Spatial organization and social relations in communities
- 5 Community burial patterns
- 6 Development and decline of complex societies in the Central Plains
- 7 Development and decline of social complexity beyond the Central Plains
- 8 Trajectories toward early states
- 9 Reconstructing social processes
- Notes
- Appendixes
- References
- Index
8 - Trajectories toward early states
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Preface
- Cambridge Cultural Social Studies
- 1 Setting the scene
- 2 The changing environmental contexts of China's first complex societies
- 3 Household subsistence and ritual
- 4 Spatial organization and social relations in communities
- 5 Community burial patterns
- 6 Development and decline of complex societies in the Central Plains
- 7 Development and decline of social complexity beyond the Central Plains
- 8 Trajectories toward early states
- 9 Reconstructing social processes
- Notes
- Appendixes
- References
- Index
Summary
Yu controlled the floods, defined the territories of the Nine Prefectures, and regulated the land-use system. Every state paid tribute in accord with the distance of their locations [from the capital] and their local products. Shortage and abundance were balanced through redistribution, and the Ten Thousand States were pacified.
“Shihuozhi” in Hanshu, by Ban Gu (AD 32–92)Introduction: from chiefdoms to states
China is one of the most ancient civilizations/states in the world, and today few people question its independent development. However, there is little consensus among scholars concerning the dates, locations, and main actors involved in the formation of the earliest state in China. Regarding these issues, three different opinions have significantly affected archaeological approaches. The first opinion, held by some Chinese archaeologists and historians, is the most radical. It holds that early civilization emerged during the Longshan period or even earlier, as indicated in the use of written inscriptions, bronze metallurgy, the construction of city walls or large public structures, institutionalized ritual, human sacrifice, and marked social stratification in mortuary contexts (e.g., Li Xueqin 1997b: 20–38). Textual information has also been sought to support this opinion; the era of the legendary Five Emperors is frequently regarded by many archaeologists as related to the period of late Neolithic cultures (e.g., Cao 2001; Xu Shunzhan 1999). Recent excavations at several sites in central Henan, such as Wangchenggang and Xinzhai, and Taosi in Shanxi are aimed at searching for the earliest stage of social development of these legendary polities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Chinese NeolithicTrajectories to Early States, pp. 223 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
- 1
- Cited by