Book contents
- Charity Law and Accumulation
- Charity Law and Accumulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- List of Acronyms, Abbreviations and Frequently Cited Works
- Part I Charities and Accumulation Delineated
- Part II Charities and Accumulation Delimited
- Part III Charities and Accumulation Reformed
- 7 Intergenerational Justice and the Intergenerational Distribution of Benefits
- 8 Which Generation Decides the Intergenerational Distribution of Benefits?
- 9 Enhanced Agency Costs
- 10 Conclusion
- Index
9 - Enhanced Agency Costs
from Part III - Charities and Accumulation Reformed
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2021
- Charity Law and Accumulation
- Charity Law and Accumulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Statutes
- List of Acronyms, Abbreviations and Frequently Cited Works
- Part I Charities and Accumulation Delineated
- Part II Charities and Accumulation Delimited
- Part III Charities and Accumulation Reformed
- 7 Intergenerational Justice and the Intergenerational Distribution of Benefits
- 8 Which Generation Decides the Intergenerational Distribution of Benefits?
- 9 Enhanced Agency Costs
- 10 Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The accumulation of assets by charities enhances the risk of agency costs resulting from charity controllers shirking or acting in their own interests, such as by losing or misapplying accumulated funds or hoarding assets to increase their own prestige or job security. This chapter identifies that there is limited need for structural reform, although there may be some scope for improved administration by regulators so as to reduce agency costs. The chapter sketches key market mechanisms that work to reduce agency costs for many of the types of charities identified as potential sites of accumulation, such as universities, hospitals and fund-raising religious institutions. It then outlines the coordinated effect of the legal restraints discussed in Part II and considers whether there really are material gaps, particularly in jurisdictions such as Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand that have reformed their charity regulators. Finally, consideration is given to whether more coordinated action by existing regulators could fill any remaining gaps. Examples are provided from the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Charity Law and AccumulationMaintaining an Intergenerational Balance, pp. 257 - 271Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021