Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part VIII - Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2021
Book contents
- Changing Senses of Place
- Changing Senses of Place
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Climate Change and Ecological Regime Shifts
- Part II Migration, Mobility and Belonging
- Part III Renewable Energy Transitions
- Part IV Nationalism and Competing Territorial Claims
- Part V Urban Change
- Part VI Technological and Legal Transformations
- Part VII Design and Planning Strategies for Changing Senses of Place
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Changing Senses of PlaceNavigating Global Challenges, pp. 329 - 347Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. and Patton, E. (2011) ‘Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006Google Scholar
Bartel, R. (2014) ‘Vernacular knowledge and environmental law: cause and cure for regulatory failure’, Local Environment, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.798636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds) (2008) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borie, M., Gustafsson, K. M., Obermeister, N., Turnhout, E. and Bridgewater, P. (2020) ‘Institutionalising reflexivity? Transformative learning and the intergovernmental science-policy: Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)’, Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 110, pp. 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.005Google Scholar
Briassoulis, H. (2017) ‘Response assemblages and their socioecological fit: conceptualizing human responses to environmental degradation’, Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 7, pp. 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617720079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, A., Hansen, R., Van der Jagt, S., et al. (2019) ‘Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 40, pp. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., et al. (2020) ‘A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability’, Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrozza, C. (2015) ‘Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.914894Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. (1996) In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. (2011) Mobilities I: catching up. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510383348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, T. (2012) ‘Mobilities II: still’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349Google Scholar
Di Masso, A. (2015) ‘Micropolitics of public space: on the contested limits of citizenship as a locational practice’, Journal of Social & Political Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63–83. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Masso, A., Williams, D. R., Raymond, C. M., et al. (2019) ‘Between fixities and flows: navigating place attachments in an increasingly mobile world’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.006Google Scholar
Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., et al. (2020) ‘Transforming knowledge systems for life on earth: visions of future systems and how to get there’, Energy Research and Social Science, vol. 70, article 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. (1993) ‘Science for the post-normal age’, Futures, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-LGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, G. (2011) ‘The cultural authority of science: public trust and acceptance of organized science’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 20, pp. 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365246Google Scholar
George, C. and Reed, M. G. (2017) ‘Operationalising just sustainability: towards a model for place-based governance’, Local Environment, vol. 22, pp. 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1101059Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991) ‘Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age’, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, E., Lewis, B., Damiano, A. and Calhoun, M. (2019) ‘The diversity of gentrification. Multiple forms of gentrification in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA)’, University of Minnesota. Available at: http://gentrification.umn.edu/sites/gentrification.dl.umn.edu/files/media/diversity-of-gentrification-012519.pdf (accessed 12 April 2020).Google Scholar
Gulsrud, N. M., Hertzog, K. and Shears, I. (2018) ‘Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne? Investigating “green placemaking” as a nature-based solution’, Environmental Research, vol. 161, pp. 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, G., Kolmes, S., Humphreys, M., McLain, R., and Jones, E. T. (2019) ‘Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin’, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00548-xGoogle Scholar
Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T. and Loorbach, D. (2019) ‘Capacities for urban transformations governance and the case of New York City, Cities, vol. 94, pp. 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.037Google Scholar
Kelkar, S. (2019) ‘Post-truth and the search for objectivity: political polarization and the remaking of knowledge production’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, vol. 5, pp. 86–106. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.268Google Scholar
King, T. L. (2019) The Black shoals: Offshore formations of Black and Native studies, Durham, NC, Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478005681Google Scholar
Kinnvall, C. and Mitzen, J. (2020) ‘Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens’, International Theory, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297192000010XGoogle Scholar
Kirke, X. (2020) ‘Anxiety and COVID-19: the role of ontological security and myth’, E-International Relations [Online]. Available at: www.e-ir.info/2020/05/29/anxiety-and-covid-19-the-role-of-ontological-security-and-myth (accessed 8 December 2020).Google Scholar
Koontz, T. M., Gupta, D., Mudliar, P. and Ranjan, P. (2015) ‘Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 53, no. B, pp. 139–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1960) The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Langhoerst, J. (2018) ‘Enacting landscape democracy: assembling public open space and asserting the right to the city’, in Egoz, S., Jorgenson, K., and Ruggeri, D. (eds), Defining Landscape Democracy: A Path to Spatial Justice. Aldershot, Edward Elgar, pp. 106–118.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., von Wirth, T. and Frantzeskaki, N. (2020) ‘Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions’, vol 35, pp. 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009Google Scholar
Marulanda, A. and Martí, M. (2019) ‘Desafiando la gentrificación. Resistencias a los desplazamientos en los centros históricos de Quito y Cuenca’. Scripta Nova, vol. 13, no. 607, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Moore, M.-L., Olsson, P., Nilsson, W., Rose, L. and Westley, F. R. (2018) ‘Navigating emergence and system reflexivity as key transformative capacities: experiences from a Global Fellowship program’, Ecology and Society, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10166-230238Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. (2009) Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muiderman, K., Gupta, A., Vervoort, J. and Biermann, F. (2020) ‘Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: different conceptions of the future and implications for the present’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. e673. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.673Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. J., Eriksen, S., Taylor, M., et al. (2020) ‘Beyond technical fixes: climate solutions and the great derangement’, Climate and Development, vol. 12, no. 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, M. (2010) ‘Anticipation, climate change, and movement in Greenland’, Les Inuit et le changement climatique/The Inuit and Climate Change, vol. 34, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. (2013) ‘Time, a slippery challenge. Bulletin of People–Environment Studies’, vol. 39, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Quay, M. (2010) ‘Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change adaptation’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2010.508428Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Kaaronen, R., Giusti, M., Linder, N. and Barthel, S. (2021) ‘Engaging with the pragmatics of relational thinking, leverage points and transformations: a reply to West et al. 2020. Ecosystems and People, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1867645Google Scholar
Ryan, A. and Walsh, T. (2018) ‘Reflexivity and critical pedagogy’, in Ryan, A. and Walsh, T. (eds), Reflexivity and Critical Pedagogy, Leiden, Brill Sense, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004384507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaab, G. L. (2013) ‘Relational ontology’, in Runehov, A. L. C., and Oviedo, L. (eds), Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Dordrecht, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_847Google Scholar
Sibley, D. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West, East Sussex, Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430545Google Scholar
Soja, E. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnit, R. (2016) Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities, Chicago, Haymarket Press.Google Scholar
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., et al. (2017) ‘Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: lessons learned for sustainability’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability vols 26–27, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bccGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E. (1988). ‘Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life cycles’. In Size-Structured Populations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S., Jamila Haider, L., Stålhammar, S. and Woroniecki, S. (2020) ‘A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations’, Ecosystems and People, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. (2013) ‘Science, practice, and place’, in Stewart, W. P., Williams, D. R. and Kruger, L. E. (eds), Place-Based Conservation: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5802-5Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. (2018) ‘Spacing conservation practice: place-making, social learning, and adaptive governance in natural resource management’, in Marsden, T. (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Nature, vol. 1, London, SAGE Publications, pp. 285–303.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. and Van Patten, S. R. (2006) ‘Home and away? Creating identities and sustaining places in a multicentered world’, in McIntyre, N., Williams, D. R. and McHugh, K. E. (eds), Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home, and Identity, Cambridge, CABI Publishing, pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Wyborn, C. (2015) ‘Co-productive governance: a relational framework for adaptive governance’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 30, pp. 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.009Google Scholar
Wyborn, C., Yung, L., Murphy, D. and Williams, D. R. (2015) ‘Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains’, Regional Environmental Change, vol. 15, pp. 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0663-3Google Scholar