Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:57:59.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The death penalty in South Korea and Japan: ‘Asian values’ and the debate about capital punishment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Byung-Sun Cho
Affiliation:
Professor of Law Chongju University College of Law in South Korea
Peter Hodgkinson
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
William A. Schabas
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Get access

Summary

Introduction

On 3 April 1997, the UN Commission on Human Rights approved Resolution 1997/12, (‘Question of the Death Penalty’), presented by Italy with forty-five other countries co-sponsoring: the resolution was passed with twenty-seven votes in favour, eleven against and fourteen abstentions. It is not surprising that the issue of the death penalty should be addressed by retentionist countries in a relativist mode, and it is significant to note that the two groups, that is Asian and Islamic countries, that held the forefront, especially at the 53rd session of the Commission, in the battle against the Italian resolution, are the most vocal and most articulate in developing the theme of relativism in all matters pertaining to human rights. Countries in the Far East, South Korea, North Korea, China and Japan, are probably the most articulate and the earliest proponents of the relativist approach. All these countries included in their arguments the complaint that the resolution proposed by Italy constituted an inadmissible attempt, on a matter as delicate as that of capital punishment, to impose views that were culturally specific and did not show sufficient respect for other traditions, and which were also – particularly as far as the Islamic countries were concerned – of a religious nature.

As far as the issue of capital punishment is concerned, a major component of ‘Asian values’ is Confucianism, which is characterised by justice and retribution.

South Korea: from retentionist to de facto abolitionist?

The supreme penalty under Korean law is death by hanging.

Type
Chapter
Information
Capital Punishment
Strategies for Abolition
, pp. 253 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×