Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:25:57.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Notation II

from Volume II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2018

By
Lawrence Earp
Edited by
Mark Everist  and
Thomas Forrest Kelly
Mark Everist
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Thomas Forrest Kelly
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Medieval Music , pp. 674 - 717
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluas, Luminita. “The Quatuor principalia musicae: A Critical Edition and Translation, with Introduction and Commentary,” 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1996.Google Scholar
Anonymous iv. The Music Treatise of Anonymous IV: A New Translation, trans. Yudkin, Jeremy, Musicological Studies and Documents 41. Neuhausen-Stuttgart: American Institute of Musicology/Hänssler-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Anonymous iv. Der Musiktraktat des Anonymus 4, ed. Reckow, Fritz, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 5. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1967.Google Scholar
Apel, Willi. The Notation of Polyphonic Music 900–1600, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America, 1953.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Charles M. “Franco of Cologne on the Rhythm of Organum purum,” Early Music History 9 (1989), 1–26.Google Scholar
Baltzer, Rebecca A. “The Manuscript Makers of W1: Further Evidence for an Early Date,” in Quomodo cantabimus canticum? Studies in Honor of Edward H. Roesner, ed. Cannata, David Butler, Currie, Gabriela Ilnitchi, Mueller, Rena Charnin and Nádas, John Louis (Middleton, WI: American Institute of Musicology, 2008), 103–20.Google Scholar
Bank, J[oannes]. A. Tactus, Tempo and Notation in Mensural Music from the 13th to the 17th Century. Amsterdam: Annie Bank, 1972.Google Scholar
Bent, Margaret. “The Earliest Fifteenth-Century Transmission of English Music to the Continent,” in Essays on the History of English Music in Honour of John Caldwell: Sources, Style, Performance, Historiography, ed. Hornby, Emma and Maw, David. Woodbridge: Boydell, 2010, 83–96.Google Scholar
Bent, Margaret. “Notation, §III, 3. Polyphonic Mensural Notation, c. 1260–1500,” in NG2, vol. xviii: 129–40.Google Scholar
Bent, Margaret. “A Preliminary Assessment of the Independence of English Trecento Notations,” L’Ars nova italiana del Trecento 4 (1978), 65–82.Google Scholar
Bent, Margaret. “The Transmission of English Music,” in Kurt von Fischer zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich and Lüttolf, Max. Munich: Katzbichler, 1973.Google Scholar
Berger, Christian. Hexachord, Mensur und Textstruktur: Studien zum französischen Lied des 14. Jahrhunderts, Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 35. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1992.Google Scholar
Besseler, Heinrich and Gülke, Peter. Schriftbild der mehrstimmigen Musik, Musikgeschichte in Bildern 3/5. Leipzig: VEB Deutscher Verlag für Musik, 1973.Google Scholar
Bockholdt, Rudolf. “Semibrevis minima und Prolatio temporis: Zur Entstehung der Mensuraltheorie der Ars nova,” Musikforschung 16 (1963), 3–21.Google Scholar
Bradley, Catherine. “Contrafacta and Transcribed Motets: Vernacular Influences on Latin Motets and Clausulae in the Florence Manuscript,” Early Music History 32 (2013), 1–70.Google Scholar
Burkard, Thorsten and Huck, Oliver. “Voces applicatae verbis, Ein musikologischer und poetologischer Traktat aus dem 14. Jahrhundert (I-Vnm Lat. CI. XII.97 [4125]), Einleitung, Edition, Übersetzung und Kommentar,” Acta musicologica 74 (2002), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse Berger, Anna Maria. Medieval Music and the Art of Memory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse Berger, Anna Maria. Mensuration and Proportion Signs: Origins and Evolution, Oxford Monographs on Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Colette, Marie-Noëlle, Popin, Marielle, and Vendrix, Philippe. Histoire de la notation du Moyen Âge à la Renaissance, Musique ouverte. [Paris]: Minerve, 2003.Google Scholar
Crocker, Richard L. “Musica rhythmica and Musica metrica in Antique and Medieval Theory,” Journal of Music Theory 2 (1958), 2–23.Google Scholar
Desmond, Karen. “Did Vitry Write an Ars vetus et nova?” The Journal of Musicology 32 (2015), 441–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Karen. “New Light on Jacobus, Author of Speculum musicae,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 9 (2002), 19–40.Google Scholar
Di Bacco, Giuliano. “Original and Borrowed Authorship and Authority: Remarks on the Circulation of Philipoctus da Caserta’s Theoretical Legacy,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context: New Perspectives on the Chantilly Codex (Bibliothèque du Château de Chantilly, Ms. 564), ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, Centre d’Études Supérieures de la Renaissance, Collection “Épitome musical.” Turnhout: Brepols, 2009, 329–64.Google Scholar
Dyer, Joseph. “A Thirteenth-Century Choirmaster: The ‘Scientia Artis Musicae’ of Elias Salomon,” The Musical Quarterly 66 (1980), 83–111.Google Scholar
Earp, Lawrence. “Cathedral and Court: Music under the Late Capetian and Valois Kings, to Louis XI,” in The Cambridge Companion to French Music, ed. Trezise, Simon, Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge University Press, 2015, 21–48.Google Scholar
Earp, Lawrence. “Interpreting the Deluxe Manuscript: Exigencies of Scribal Practice and Manuscript Production in Machaut,” in The Calligraphy of Medieval Music, ed. Haines, John, Musicalia Medii Aevi 1. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011, 223–40.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Oliver B., ed. and trans. The Berkeley Manuscript: University of California Music Library, MS. 744 (olim Phillipps 4450), Greek and Latin Music Theory. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Everist, Mark. “From Paris to St. Andrews: The Origins of W1,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 43 (1990), 1–42.Google Scholar
Everist, Mark. “A New Source for the Polyphony of the Ars subtilior: Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, nouvelles acquisitions françaises 22069,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 283–301.Google Scholar
Fallows, David. “The End of the Ars subtilior,” Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis 20 (1996), 21–40.Google Scholar
Fassler, Margot E. “Accent, Meter, and Rhythm in Medieval Treatises ‘De rithmis,’” Journal of Musicology 5 (1987), 164–90.Google Scholar
Fassler, Margot E. “The Role of the Parisian Sequence in the Evolution of Notre-Dame Polyphony,” Speculum 62 (1987), 345–74.Google Scholar
Franco of Cologne. Ars cantus mensurabilis, ed. Reaney, Gilbert and Gilles, André, CSM 18. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1974.Google Scholar
Frobenius, Wolf. “Longa – brevis”; “Prolatio”; “Proprietas”; “Semibrevis,” in Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, ed. Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972–.Google Scholar
Fuller, Sarah. “A Phantom Treatise of the Fourteenth Century? The Ars nova,” Journal of Musicology 4 (1985–86), 23–50.Google Scholar
Fuller, Sarah. “Theoretical Foundations of Early Organum Theory,” Acta musicologica 53 (1981), 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, F. Alberto. “Die Notationslehre im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,” in Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder, Geschichte der Musiktheorie 5. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1984, 257–356.Google Scholar
Gallo, F. Alberto. La teoria della notazione in Italia dalla fine del XIII all’inizio del XV secolo, Antiquae Musicae Italicae Subsidia Theoretica. Bologna: Tamari, 1966.Google Scholar
Gallo, F. Alberto, Gehring, Julia, and Huck, Oliver. “La notazione ‘italiana’ del Trecento,” Rivista italiana di musicologia 39 (2004), 235–70.Google Scholar
Gillingham, Bryan. Modal Rhythm, Musicological Studies 46. Ottawa: The Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1986.Google Scholar
Gozzi, Marco. “La cosiddetta ‘Longanotation’: Nuove prospettive sulla notazione italiana del Trecento,” Musica Disciplina 49 (1995), 121–49.Google Scholar
Gozzi, Marco. “New Light on Italian Trecento Notation Part 1: Sections i–iv.1,” Recercare 13 (2001), 5–78.Google Scholar
Gozzi, Marco. “On the Text–Music Relationship in the Italian Trecento: The Case of the Petrarchan Madrigal Non al so amante set by Jacopo da Bologna,” Polifonie 4 (2004), 197–222.Google Scholar
Gray, John. “The Ars Nova Treatises Attributed to Philippe de Vitry: Translation and Commentary,” 2 vols. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, 1996.Google Scholar
Gross, Guillaume. Chanter en polyphonie à Notre-Dame de Paris aux 12e et 13e siècles, Studia Artistarum, Études sur la faculté des arts dans les universités médiévales 14. Turnhout: Brepols, 2007.Google Scholar
Gross, Guillaume. “Organum at Notre-Dame in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries: Rhetoric in Words and Music,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 15 (2006), 87–108.Google Scholar
de Machaut, Guillaume. Le Livre dou Voir Dit (The Book of the True Poem), ed. Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel, trans. Palmer, R. Barton, Garland Library of Medieval Literature 106A. New York and London: Garland, 1998.Google Scholar
Günther, Ursula. “Das Ende der Ars nova,” Musikforschung 16 (1963), 105–20.Google Scholar
Günther, Ursula. “Polymetric Rondeaux from Machaut to Dufay: Some Style-Analytical Observations,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Style: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue, ed. Wolf, Eugene K. and Roesner, Edward H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, 75–108.Google Scholar
Haas, Max. “Die Musiklehre im 13. Jahrhundert von Johannes de Garlandia bis Franco,” in Die Mittelalterliche Lehre von der Mehrstimmigkeit, ed. Zaminer, Frieder, 89–159.Google Scholar
Haggh, Barbara and Michel Huglo, . “Magnus liber – Maius munus: origine et destinée du manuscrit F,” Revue de musicologie 90 (2004), 193–230.Google Scholar
Haines, John. “The Origins of the Musical Staff,” The Musical Quarterly 91 (2008), 327–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, John. “Proprietas and Perfection in Thirteenth-Century Music,” Theoria: Historical Aspects of Music Theory 15 (2008), 5–29.Google Scholar
Johannes, Hanboys. Summa, ed. and trans. Lefferts, Peter M. (with Robertus de Handlo, Regule). Lincoln; London: University of Nebraska Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Robertus de, Handlo. Regule (The Rules) …, ed. and trans. Lefferts, Peter M.. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frank Ll. and Wibberley, Roger, eds. Manuscripts of Fourteenth-Century English Polyphony, Early English Church Music 26. London: Stainer & Bell, 1981.Google Scholar
Herlinger, Jan. “Music Theory of the Fourteenth and Early Fifteenth Centuries,” in Music as Concept and Practice in the Late Middle Ages, ed. Strohm, Reinhard and Blackburn, Bonnie J., New Oxford History of Music 3/1. Oxford University Press, 2001, 244–300.Google Scholar
Hiley, David and Payne, Thomas B.. “Notation, §III, 2. Polyphony and Secular Monophony to c. 1260,” in NG2, vol. xviii: 119–29.Google Scholar
Hirshberg, Jehoash. “Criticism of Music and Music as Criticism in the Chantilly Codex,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 133–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, Oliver. “‘Modus cantandi’ und Prolatio. ‘Aere ytalico’ und ‘aere gallico’ im Codex Rossi 215,” Die Musikforschung 54 (2001), 115–30.Google Scholar
Huck, Oliver. “Music for Luchino, Bernabò and Gian Galeazzo Visconti,” in Kontinuität und Transformation in der italienischen Vokalmusik zwischen Due- und Quattrocento, ed. Dieckmann, Sandra et al., Musica Mensurabilis 3. Hildesheim: Olms, 2007, 247–58.Google Scholar
Huck, Oliver. “Notation und Rhythmus im Tempus perfectum in der Musik des frühen Trecento,” Analecta musicologica 37 (2005), 41–56.Google Scholar
Hughes, Andrew and Bent, Margaret. The Old Hall Manuscript, 3 vols., CMM 46. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar
Huglo, Michel. “Règlement du XIIIe siècle pour la transcription des livres notés,” in Festschrift Bruno Stäblein zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Ruhnke, Martin. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1967, 121–33.Google Scholar
Jacobus of Liège. Speculum musicae, liber septimus, ed. Bragard, Roger, CSM 3. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar
de Garlandia, Johannes. De mensurabili musica, ed. Reimer, Eric, 2 vols., Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 10. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar
de Muris, Johannes. Ars practica mensurabili cantus secundum Iohannem de Muris: Die Recensio maior des sogenannten “Libellus practice cantus mensurabilis,” ed. Berktold, Christian, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Veröffentlichungen der Musikhistorischen Kommission 14. Munich: Beck’schen Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1999.Google Scholar
de Muris, Johannes. Notitia artis musicae … ed. Michels, Ulrich, CSM 17. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1972.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas Forrest. Capturing Music: The Story of Notation. New York: Norton, 2015.Google Scholar
Lambertus/Aristoteles. The “Ars musica” attributed to Magister Lambertus/Aristoteles, ed. Meyer, Christian, trans. Desmond, Karen, Royal Musical Association Monographs 27. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Leach, Elizabeth Eva. “Nature’s Forge and Mechanical Production: Writing, Reading and Performing Song,” in Rhetoric beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages, ed. Carruthers, Mary J., Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 78. Cambridge University Press, 2010, 72–95.Google Scholar
Lefferts, Peter M. “An Anonymous Treatise of the Theory of Frater Robertus de Brunham,” in Quellen und Studien zur Musiktheorie des Mittelalters, vol. iii, ed. Bernhard, Michael. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2001.Google Scholar
Lefferts, Peter M. The Motet in the Fourteenth Century, Studies in Musicology 94. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lerch, Irmgard. “Mensuralnotation zwischen Ars antiqua und Ars nova,” Musica Disciplina 54 (2004), 5–38.Google Scholar
Long, Michael. “Musical Tastes in Fourteenth-Century Italy: Notational Styles, Scholarly Traditions, and Historical Circumstances.” Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1981.Google Scholar
Losseff, Nicola. The Best Concords: Polyphonic Music in Thirteenth-Century Britain, Outstanding Dissertations in Music from British Universities. New York; London: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Friedrich. “Excurs II: Die der Darstellung des Rhythmus dienende Differenzierung in der Schreibung der Notengruppen in der Quadrat-Notation; die Herrschaft der modalen Rhythmen in den rhythmisch strengeren melismatischen Partien der Organa, in den ältesten Motetten in ganzem Umfang und in einigen Gattungen der 1 stimmigen Lieder,” in Repertorium organorum recentioris et motetorum vetustissimi stili, ed. Dittmer, Luther A.. New York: Institute of Mediaeval Music; Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964, vol. i.1: 42–57.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Friedrich. “[Review of Wolf, Geschichte der Mensural-Notation],” in Sammelbände der Internationalen Musik-Gesellschaft 6 (1904–05), 597–641Google Scholar
Lütteken, Laurenz. “Notation. vi.1–4. Mensuralnotation,” in MGG2, Sachteil, vol. vii: cols. 323–35.Google Scholar
Marchettus of Padua. Pomerium, ed. Vecchi, Giuseppe, CSM 6. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1961.Google Scholar
Michels, Ulrich. Die Musiktraktate des Johannes de Muris, Beihefte zum Arkiv für Musikwissenschaft 8. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1970.Google Scholar
Nádas, John and Ziino, Agostino, eds. The Lucca Codex (Codice Mancini): Lucca, Archivio di Stato, MS 184; Perugia, Biblioteca Comunale Augusta, MS 3065: Introductory Study and Facsimile Edition, Ars Nova 1. Lucca: Libreria Musicale Italiana, 1990.Google Scholar
Norwood, Patricia P. “Evidence Concerning the Provenance of the Bamberg Codex,” Journal of Musicology 8 (1990), 491–504.Google Scholar
Odington, Walter. De speculatione musicae, Part vi, trans. Huff, Jay A., Musicological Studies and Documents 31. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1973.Google Scholar
Odington, Walter. Summa de speculatione musica, ed. Hammond, Frederick F., CSM 14. Rome: American Institute of Musicology, 1970.Google Scholar
Page, Christopher. Discarding Images: Reflections on Music and Culture in Medieval France. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Page, Christopher. Latin Poetry and Conductus Rhythm in Medieval France, Royal Musical Association Monographs 8. London: Royal Musical Association, 1997.Google Scholar
Parrish, Carl. The Notation of Medieval Music. New York: Norton, 1959; reprint New York: Pendragon, 1978.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor. Motets and Prosulas, ed. Payne, Thomas B., Recent Researches in Music of the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance 41. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, 2011.Google Scholar
Pinegar, Sandra. “Textual and Conceptual Relationships among Theoretical Writings on Mensurable Music of the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1991.Google Scholar
Pirrotta, Nino. “Marchettus de Padua and the Italian Ars nova,” Musica Disciplina 9 (1955), 57–71.Google Scholar
Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, eds. Codex Chantilly, Bibliothèque du château de Chantilly, Ms. 564, Introduction, Collection “Épitome musical.” Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar
Rastall, Richard. The Notation of Western Music: An Introduction. London: Dent, 1983.Google Scholar
Reckow, Fritz. “Proprietas und Perfectio: Zur Geschichte des Rhythmus, seiner Aufzeichnung und Terminologie im 13. Jahrhundert,” Acta musicologica 39 (1967), 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristory, Heinz. Denkmodelle zur französischen Mensuraltheorie des 14. Jahrhunderts. Vol. i, Historische Darstellung, Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen / Musicological Studies 81/1. Ottawa: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 2004.Google Scholar
Roesner, Edward H. “The Emergence of Musica mensurabilis,” in Studies in Musical Sources and Style: Essays in Honor of Jan LaRue., ed. Wolf, Eugene K. and Roesner, Edward H.. Madison, WI: A-R Editions, 1990, 41–74.Google Scholar
Roesner, Edward H. “The Music in MS fr. 146,” in Le Roman de Fauvel in the Edition of Mesire Chaillou de Pesstain: A Reproduction in Facsimile of the Complete Manuscript Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Fonds Français 146, eds. Roesner, Edward H., Avril, François, and Regalado, Nancy Freeman. New York: Broude Brothers, 1990.Google Scholar
Roesner, Edward H. “The Performance of Parisian Organum,” Early Music 7 (1979), 174–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ernest H. “Duple Rhythm and Alternate Third Mode in the 13th Century,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 15 (1962), 249–91.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ernest H. “Rithmus,” in Essays on Medieval Music in Honor of David G. Hughes, ed. Boone, Graeme M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995, 415–40.Google Scholar
Stoessel, Jason. “The Captive Scribe: The Context and Culture of Scribal and Notational Process in the Music of the Ars subtilior.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of New England, Armidale, Australia, 2002.Google Scholar
Stoessel, Jason. “Symbolic Innovation: The Notation of Jacob de Senleches,” Acta Musicologica 71 (1999), 136–64.Google Scholar
Stone, Anne. “Che cosa c’è di più sottile riguardo l’Ars subtilior?” Rivista italiana di musicologia 31 (1996), 3–31.Google Scholar
Stone, Anne. “The Composer’s Voice in the Late Fourteenth-Century Song: Four Case Studies,” in Johannes Ciconia: Musicien de la transition, ed. Vendrix, Philippe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2003, 179–87.Google Scholar
Stone, Anne. “Glimpses of the Unwritten Tradition in some Ars subtilior Works,” Musica Disciplina 50 (1996), 59–93.Google Scholar
Stone, Anne. “Writing Rhythm in Late Medieval Italy: Notation and Musical Style in the Manuscript Modena, Biblioteca Estense, Alpha.M.5.24.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1994.Google Scholar
Tanay, Dorit. “Between the Fig Tree and the Laurel: Or voit tout en aventure Revisited,” in A Late Medieval Songbook and Its Context, ed. Plumley, Yolanda and Stone, Anne, 161–78.Google Scholar
Tanay, Dorit. Noting Music, Marking Culture: The Intellectual Context of Rhythmic Notation, 1250–1400, Musicological Studies and Documents 46. Holzgerlingen: American Institute of Musicology/Hänssler-Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
Traub, Andreas. “Notation. v. Modalnotation,” in MGG2, Sachteil, vol. vii: cols. 317–23.Google Scholar
Vecchi, Giuseppe. ed. “Anonimi Rubrice breves,” Quadrivium 10 (1969), 125–34.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, Pamela. “Teachers, Booksellers and Taxes: Reinvestigating the Life and Activities of Johannes de Garlandia,” Plainsong and Medieval Music 8 (1999), 1–13Google Scholar
Wibberley, Roger. “Notation in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries,” in Manuscripts of Fourteenth-Century English Polyphony, ed. Harrison, Frank Ll. and Wibberley, Roger, xix–xxviii.Google Scholar
Wolf, Johannes. Geschichte der Mensural-Notation von 1250–1460. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1904.Google Scholar
Wright, Craig. Music at the Court of Burgundy 1364–1419: A Documentary History, Musicological Studies 28. Henryville, PA: Institute of Mediaeval Music, 1979.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×