Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- 1 The Human Psyche Lives in Semiospheres
- 2 Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology
- 3 Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations
- 4 “Mediationism” in Cognitive and Social Theory
- 5 Sociocultural Psychology and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: The Semiotic Space in the Consulting Room
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
4 - “Mediationism” in Cognitive and Social Theory
from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2018
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- 1 The Human Psyche Lives in Semiospheres
- 2 Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology
- 3 Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations
- 4 “Mediationism” in Cognitive and Social Theory
- 5 Sociocultural Psychology and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: The Semiotic Space in the Consulting Room
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 63 - 77Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bentley, A. F. (1938). Physicists and fairies. Philosophy of Science, 5, 132–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical, and ideological messages. In McGarty, C. & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.), The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (2004). Introduction. In Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Social Cognition (pp. xi–xii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carr, H. A. (1915). Review of J. B. Watson (1914). Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 308–312.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. & Costall, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of an historical psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A. (1988). A closer look at direct perception. In Gellatly, A., Rogers, D., & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Cognition and Social Worlds (pp. 10–21). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (1990). Picture perception as “indirect” perception. In Landwehr, K. (Ed.), Ecological Perception Research, Visual Communication and Aesthetics (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (1991). Graceful degradation: Cognitivism and the metaphors of the computer. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 151–170). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior & Philosophy, 32, 179–195.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2006a). “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 634–654.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2006b). On being the right size: Affordances and the question of scale. In Lock, G. & Molyneaux, B. (Eds.), Confronting Scale in Archaeology: Issues of Theory and Practice (pp. 15–26). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2007). Bringing the body back to life: James Gibson's ecology of agency. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R., & Dirven, R. (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 1: Embodiment (pp. 241–270). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2012). Introspection and the myth of methodological behaviourism. In Clegg, J. W. (Ed.), Self-observation in the Social Sciences (pp. 67–80). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2013). The unconscious theory in modern cognitivism. In Racine, T. P. & Slaney, K. L. (Eds.), A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology (pp. 312–327). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A. & Dreier, O. (2006). Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Objects. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Costall, A., Leudar, I., & Reddy, V. (2006). Failing to see the irony in “mind-reading.” Theory & Psychology, 16, 163–167.Google Scholar
Costall, A. P. & Still, A. W. (1989). James Gibson's theory of direct perception and the problem of cultural relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 433–441.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (Ed.) (1996). Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). The varieties of social construction. Theory & Psychology, 7, 399–416.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy. In The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays (pp. 1–19). New York: Henry Holt & Co. (First published in Popular Science Monthly, July 1909.)Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1914/1977). Psychological doctrine and philosophical teaching. In Morgenbesser, S. (Ed.), Dewey and His Critics (pp. 439–445). New York: Journal of Philosophy. (First published in the Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1914, 11(19).)Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Dewey, J. (Ed.), Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 3–69). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. New York: Dover. (Based on the Paul Carus lectures of 1925.)Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1947). Phenomenology and epistemology of consciousness of objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7, 505–542.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1995). A commentary on discursive and cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology, 1, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, R. (1996). Introduction. In Ellen, Roy & Fukui, Katsuyoshi (Eds.), Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Falmagne, R. J. (1995). The abstract and the concrete. In Martin, L. M. W., Nelson, K., & Tobach, E. (Eds.), Sociocultural Psychology: Theory and Practice of Doing and Knowing (pp. 205–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, W. J. & Nunez, R. (2001). Restoring to cognition the forgotten primacy of action, intention and emotion. In Nunez, R. & Freeman, W. J. (Eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion (pp. ix–xix). Thoverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In Miller, J. G. (Ed.), Experiments in Social Process (pp. 120–133). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1989). Dismantling reality. In Lawson, H. & Appignanesi, L. (Eds.), Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-modern World (pp. 93–100). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1997a). Introduction. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 1–11). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1997b). The work of representation. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 13–64). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Heft, H. (2001). Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James's Radical Empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. D. (2000). Beyond discipline: toward effective partnerships between conservation biologists and ecological anthropologists. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Ecology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G. (1912). The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janlert, L. E. (1987). Modeling change: the frame problem. In Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.), The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Joerges, B. (1988). Technology in everyday life: Conceptual queries. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour; 18, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kwa, C. (1987). Representations of nature mediating between ecology and science policy: The case of the International Biological Programme. Social Studies of Science, 17, 413–442.Google Scholar
Leeper, R. (1951). Cognitive processes. In Stevens, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 730–757). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.Google Scholar
Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2004a). Theory of mind. Theory & Psychology (special issue), 14(5), 571–752.Google Scholar
Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2004b). On the persistence of the problem of other minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and “theory of mind.” Theory & Psychology, 14, 603–662.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1929). The Revolt against Dualism: An Inquiry Concerning the Existence of Ideas. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Marshall, H. H. (1996). Clarifying and implementing contemporary psychological perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 31, 29–34.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1975). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In Hoskins, P. (Ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology (pp. 3–10). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Pribram, K., & Galanter, E. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. (with Miller, A. R.). (1999). The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shalin, D. N. (1993). Modernity, postmodernism, and pragmatist inquiry: An introduction. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 303–332.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. E. (2003). The agent–environment interface: Simon's indirect or Gibson's direct coupling. Ecological Psychology, 15, 37–106.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In Previn, L. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 399–416). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & MacKie, D. M. (2000). Social Psychology (2nd edn.). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. (Ed.). (1997). Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Still, A. & Costall, A. (1991a). The mutual elimination of dualism in Vygotsky and Gibson. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 225–236). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Still, A. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (1991b). Against Cognitivism. London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (1994). Social Psychology (8th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1999). Some problems with the notion of external symbolic storage, and the case of Neolithic material culture in Britain. In Renfrew, C., & Scarre, C. (Eds.), Cognition and Material Culture. Oxford: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1995). Foreword. In Baron-Cohen, S., Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind (pp. ix–xviii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1976). Knowing and Acting: An Invitation to Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1996). The Role of Abstract Rationality in Vygotsky's Image of Mind. In Tryphon, A. & Voneche, J. (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought (pp. 25–43). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar