Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Chapter 6 Normative Assessments in Empirical Business Ethics Research
- Chapter 7 Descriptive Ethics
- Chapter 8 Grounded Theory in Business Ethics
- Chapter 9 Discourse Analysis as a Method for Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Research
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Grounded Theory in Business Ethics
from Qualitative Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Chapter 6 Normative Assessments in Empirical Business Ethics Research
- Chapter 7 Descriptive Ethics
- Chapter 8 Grounded Theory in Business Ethics
- Chapter 9 Discourse Analysis as a Method for Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Research
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 127 - 137Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bevan, D. 2007. Accountability and empire: insights from the experiences of senior managers at a FTSE100 firm. PhD thesis, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Bevan, D. 2008. Continental philosophy: a grounded theory approach and the emergence of convenient and inconvenient ethics. In: Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2009. The identity – strategy link: Context, driver and consequences for firm internationalization. (Unpublished PhD dissertation in Business Administration). University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2011. The ethical issues surrounding network-expansion strategies in SME internationalization: an empirical investigation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(1/2), 71–112.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2005. Grounded theory in the twenty-first century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Christiansen, O. 2006. Opportunizing: a classic grounded theory study on business and management. Grounded Theory Review, 6, 109–133.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 1997. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among five Traditions, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2008. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E. & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.Google Scholar
Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jacob, E. 1987. Qualitative research traditions: a review. Review of Educational Research, 57, 1–50.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. 2004. Otherwise than Being – or beyond Essence, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. 2005. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. 1998. Managing the post-merger aftermath by default remodelling. Management Decision, 36, 102–110, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204188.Google Scholar
Munhall, P. L. & Oiler, C. J. (eds.) 1986. Nursing Research: a qualitative perspective, Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) 2008. Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY; Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1998). The ethnographer’s method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar