Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:15:52.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Technological Conceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Edited by
Sandra Bamford
Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 481 - 602
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bellotti v. Baird. 1979. 443 U.S. 622.Google Scholar
Cahn, N. 2003. “Perfect Substitutes or the Real Thing?” Duke Law Journal 52: 1077–1166.Google Scholar
Commonwealth v. Addicks. SC Pa. 1815. 2 Serg. & Pawle 174.Google Scholar
Dolgin, J. 1996. “Why Has the Best-Interest Standard Survived?: The Historic and Social Context.” Children’s Legal Rights Journal 16: 2–10.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. 1987. “‘Baby M’: New Questions about Biology and Destiny.” Ms. Magazine, 25–28.Google Scholar
Hofman, D. L. 2009. “‘Mama’s Baby, Daddy’s Maybe’: A State-by-State Survey of Surrogacy Laws and Their Disparate Gender Impact.” William Mitchell Law Review 35: 449–468.Google Scholar
In re Baby. (Ct of Appeals Tenn. 2013), slip opin., available at 2013 West Law 245039, appeal granted, 2013 Tenn. LEXIS 470 (S.C. Tenn. May 7, 2013).Google Scholar
In re Gault. 1967. 387 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
Johnson v. Calvert, No. X-633190, (Cal. App. Dep’t Super. Ct. Oct. 22, 1990), aff’d sub nom., Anna J. v. Mark C., 286 Cal. Rptr. 369 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991), aff’d 851 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 206 (1993).Google Scholar
Marvin v. Marvin, (Cal. 1976). 557 P.2d 106.Google Scholar
Matter of Baby M., 217 N.J. Super. 313, 525 A.2d 1128 (1987), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 109 N.J. 396, 537 A.2d 1227 (1988).Google Scholar
Mintz, S. and Kellogg, S.. 1988. Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Morone v. Morone. (N.Y. 1980) 413 N.E.2d 1154.Google Scholar
Nationwide Drive for Children’s Rights. 1977. “U.S. News & World Report.” In The Children’s Rights Movement, ed. Gross, B. and Gross, R., 206–213. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. E. 1996. “Patriarchy or Equality: Family Values or Individuality.” St. John’s Law Review 70: 435–537.Google Scholar
Parham v. J.R., 1979. 442 U.S. 584.Google Scholar
Postman, N. 1994. The Disappearance of Childhood. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. 1997. “Spiritual and Menial Housework.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 9: 51–80.Google Scholar
Rosecky v. Schissel. 2013. 833 N.W.2d 634.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, K. 1990. “Gestational Surrogacy and the Health Care Provider: Put Part of the ‘IVF Genie’ Back into the Bottle.” Law, Medicine and Health Care 18: 345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherer v. Scherer. (Ga. 1982). 292 S.E.2d 662.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. 1969. 393 U.S. 503.Google Scholar
Troxel v. Granville. 2000. 530 U.S. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States v. Green. (Cir. Ct, D. R.I. 1824). 3 Mason 482.Google Scholar
van Zyl, L. and van Niekerk, A.. 2000. “Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood.” Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 404–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Abbasi-Shavazi, J. M., McDonald, P and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. 2008. “Modernization or Cultural Maintenance: The Practice of Consanguineous Marriage in Iran.” Journal of Biosocial Science 40(6): 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Torki, S. 1980. “Milk Kinship in Arabic Society: An Unexplored Problem in the Ethnography of Marriage.” Ethnology 19(2): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arda, B. 2007. “The Importance of Secularism in Medical Ethics: The Turkish Example.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14(Suppl. 1): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargach, J. 2002. Orphans of Islam: Family, Abandonment and Secret Adoption in Morocco. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C, Ceyhan, S. T, Goktolga, U and Baser, I. 2008. “Opinions of Infertile Turkish Women on Gamete Donation and Gestational Surrogacy.” Fertility and Sterility 89: 817–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 1997. “Pioneering Procreation: Israel’s First Test-Tube Baby.” Science As Culture 6: 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2004. “‘Cheaper Than a Newcomer’: On the Political Economy of IVF in Israel.” The Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7): 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Cohen, R. 2000. “‘Our First IVF Baby’: Israel’s and Canada’s Press Coverage of Procreative Technology.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 20(7): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Yavetz, H. 2000. “Secrecy among Israeli Recipients of Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 19(1): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Diamand, Y and Abu Yaman, M. 2014. “On Fatherhood in a Conflict Zone: Gaza Fathers and Their Children’s Cancer Treatments.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Boivin, J., Bunting, I, Collins, J. A and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care.” Human Reproduction 22: 1506–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmeli, Y. S. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2000. “Ritualizing the ‘Natural Family’: Secrecy in Israeli Donor Insemination.” Science As Culture 9(3): 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, Y. S., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D, Madgar, I and Weissenberg, R. 2001. “Donor Insemination in Israel: Recipients’ Choices of Donors.” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46(8): 757–763.Google Scholar
Charrad, M. 2001. States and Women’s Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. “Shi’ite Perspectives on Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies.” ISIM Newsletter 17: 26–27.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2009. Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Collins, J. A. 2002. “An International Survey of the Health Economics of IVF and ICSI.” Human Reproductive Update 8: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Geyter, C. 2018. “More Than 8 Million Babies Born from IVF since the World’s First in 1978.” European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Press Release. www.eshre.eu/ESHRE2018/Media/ESHRE-2018-Press-releases/De-Geyter.aspx, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Eberstadt, N. and Shah, A. 2012. “Fertility Decline in the Muslim World.” Policy Review 173: 29–44.Google Scholar
Farber, A. R. 2014. Surrogacy and Fatherhood among Homosexual Couples in Israel. MA Thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Farhi, J. and Ben Haroush, A.. 2011. “Distribution of Causes of Infertility in Patients Attending Primary Fertility Clinics in Israel.” Israel Medical Association Journal 13(1): 51–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S. B. 2012. “Five Million Miracle Babies Later.” In Reproductive Technologies As Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, ed. Knecht, Michi, Klotz, Maren and Beck, Stefan, 27–60. Berlin: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Garmaroudi Naef, S. 2012. “Gestational Surrogacy in Iran: Uterine Kinship in Shia Thought and Practice.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 157–193. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gnoth, C., Maxrath, B, Skonieczny, T, Friol, K, Godehardt, C and Tigges, J. 2011. “Final ART Success Rates: A 10 Years Survey.” Human Reproduction 26(8): 2239–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtin, Z. B. 2011. “Banning Reproductive Travel? Turkey’s ART Legislation and Third-Party Assisted Reproduction.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23: 555–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gürtin, Z. B. 2012. “Assisted Reproduction in Secular Turkey: Regulation, Rhetoric, and the Role of Religion.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 285–311. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gürtin, Z. B. 2014. “Assumed, Promised, Forbidden: Infertility, IVF and Fatherhood in Turkey.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 223–242. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gürtin, Zeynep, Inhorn, Marcia C. and Tremayne, Soraya. 2015. “Islam and Assisted Reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing ‘Secular’ Turkey, Shia Iran, and the Sunni Arab World.” In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, ed. Brunn, Stanley D., 3137–3153. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, S. 1989. Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., Hirsh-Yechzkel, G, Boyko, V, Wainstock, T, Schiff, E and Lerner-Geva, L. 2010. “Attitudes toward Sex Selection: A Survey among Potential Users in Israel.” Prenatal Diagnosis 30(11): 1019–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. 1996. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2006. “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni and Shi’a Islam.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 30(4): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2014. “New Arab Fatherhood: Emergent Masculinities, Male Infertility, and Assisted Reproduction.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2018. “Fertility, Demography, and Masculinities in Arab Families: From 1950 to 2015 and Beyond.” In Arab Family Studies: Critical Reviews, ed. Joseph, Suad, 449–466. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2008. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C., Kobeissi, L, Nassar, Z, Lakkis, D and Fakih, M. H. 2009. “Consanguinity and Family Clustering of Male Infertility in Lebanon.” Fertility and Sterility 91(4): 1104–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. and Patrizio, P. 2015. “Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies, and Global Movements in the 21st Century.” Human Reproduction Update 21(4): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P and Serour, G. I. 2010. “Third-party Reproductive Assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and Multisectarian Lebanon.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 21(7): 848–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. and Tremayne, S., eds. 2012. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M, Ozgur, K, Donmez, L and Stones-Abbasi, A. 2006. “Public Opinion Regarding Oocyte Donation in Turkey: First Data from a Secular Population among the Islamic World.” Human Reproduction 21: 318–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel Ministry of Health. 2013. “In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Treatments: Absolute Numbers, Percentages, Rates.” www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/IVF1986_2012.pdf, accessed October 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Jones, H. W., Cooke, I, Kempers, R, Brinsden, P and Saunders, D. 2010. “International Federation of Fertility Societies: Surveillance 2010.” www.iffs-reproduction.org/documents/IFFS_Surveillance_2010.pdf, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Kahn, S. M. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1982. “Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and Fictive Marriages.” In Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps, ed. Ardener, S., 112–134. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1992. “Milk Kinship in Shi’ite Islamic Iran.” In The Anthropology of Breastfeeding: Natural Law or Social Construct, ed. Maher, Vanessa, 109–132. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kilic, S., Ucar, M, Yaren, H, Gulec, M, Atac, A, Demirel, F, Karabulut, C and Demirel, O. 2009. “Determination of the Attitudes of Turkish Infertile Women towards Surrogacy and Oocyte Donation.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Science 25: 36–40.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R, Boerma, T, Vanderpoel, S and Stevens, G. A. 2012. “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys.” PLOS Medicine 9: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosa, E. 2003. “Human Cloning in Muslim Ethics.” Voices across Boundaries (Fall): 23–26.Google Scholar
Nahman, Michal. 2006. “Materializing Israeliness: Difference and Mixture in Transnational Ova Donation.” Science As Culture 15(3): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahman, Michal. 2011. “Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23(5): 626–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nahman, Michal. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V, Gianaroli, L, Felberbaum, R, de Mouzon, J and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2003: Results Generated from European Registers by ESHRE.” Human Reproduction 22(6): 1513–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. 2006. “The Assessment of New Applications Discussed by Contemporary Medicine such as IVF and Stem Cell according to the Religion of Islam.” Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara. www.diyanet.gov.tr/turkish/dy/KurulDetay.aspx?ID=1162, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Schenker, J. G. 2003. “Legal Aspects of ART Practice in Israel.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics 20(7): 250–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sella, T., Chodick, G., Luenfeld, E. and Shalev, V.. 2011. “Further Evidence on the High Prevalence of Male Factor Infertility Diagnosis in Israel.” The Israel Medical Association Journal 13(6): 386.Google ScholarPubMed
Serour, G. I. 2008. “Islamic Perspectives in Human Reproduction.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 17(Suppl. 3): 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singerman, D. 2007. The Economic Imperatives of Marriage: Emerging Practices and Identities among Youth in the Middle East. Working Paper 6. Washington DC/Dubai: Wolfensohn Centre for Development and Dubai School of Government.Google Scholar
Sonbol, A. el A. 1995. “Adoption in Islamic Society: A Historical Survey.” In Children in the Muslim Middle East, ed. Warnock, Fernea Elizabeth, 45–67. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teman, E. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2006. “Not All Muslims Are Luddites.” Anthropology Today 22(93): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2009. “Law, Ethics, and Donor Technologies in Shia Iran.” In Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies, ed. Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna and Inhorn, Marcia C, 144–163. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2012. “The ‘Down Side’ of Gamete Donation: Challenging ‘Happy Family’ Rhetoric in Iran.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 130–156. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2015. “Whither Kinship? Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Relatedness in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Third Phase: Global Encounters and Emerging Moral Worlds, ed. Hampshire, Kate and Simpson, Bob, 69–82. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremayne, S. and Inhorn, M. C. 2012. “Introduction: Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 1–21. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Urman, B. and Yakin, K. 2010. “New Turkish Legislation on Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Centres: A Step in the Right Direction?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 21: 729–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, J. B. 2002. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
White, J. B. 2014. Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, E. 1990. “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(1): 71–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. 2000. “Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales.” Health Care Analysis 8(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berend, Z. 2010. “Surrogate Losses: Understandings of Pregnancy Loss and Assisted Reproduction among Surrogate Mothers.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 24(2): 240–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berend, Z. 2012. “The Romance of Surrogacy.” Sociological Forum 27(4): 913–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berend, Z. 2016. The Online World of Surrogacy. New York/London: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2009. “The Politics of ‘The Natural Family’ in Israel: State Policy and Kinship Ideologies.” Social Science and Medicine 69: 1018–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danna, D. 2015. Contract Children: Questioning Surrogacy. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag/ibidem Press.Google Scholar
Dolgin, J. L. 1990. “Status and Contract in Surrogate Motherhood: An Illumination of the Surrogacy Debate.” Buffalo Law Review 38(2): 515–550.Google ScholarPubMed
Donath, O. 2010. “Pro-Natalism and Its ‘Cracks’: Narratives of Reproduction and Childfree Lifestyles in Israel [in Hebrew].” Israeli Sociology 11(2): 417–439.Google Scholar
Hazelton, L. 1977. Israeli Women: The Reality behind the Myths. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ivry, T. 2010. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ketchum, S. A. 1992. “Selling Babies and Selling Bodies.” In Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics, ed. Holmes, H. B and Purdy, L. M, 284–294. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. 2013. “Kinship, Modernity, and the Immodern.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S and Cannell, F, 241–260. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, P. 1993. Pursuing Parenthood: Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lystra, K. 1989. Searching the Heart: Women, Men, and Romantic Love in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markens, S. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rao, R. 2003. “Surrogacy Law in the United States: The Outcome of Ambivalence.” In Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives, ed. Cook, R, Sclater, S. D and Kaganas, F, 23–35. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. 2000. Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D. M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teman, E. 2008. “The Social Construction of Surrogacy Research: An Anthropological Critique of the Psychosocial Scholarship on Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Science and Medicine 67(7): 1104–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teman, E. 2010a. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Teman, E. 2010b. “The Last Outpost of the Nuclear Family: A Cultural Critique of Israeli Surrogacy Policy.” In Kin, Gene, Community: Reproductive Technology among Jewish Israelis, ed. Birenbaum-Carmeli, D and Carmeli, Y, 107–126. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V. 2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy.” Law & Social Inquiry 25(3): 817–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ashley’s Mom and Dad. 2007, updated 2012. “The Ashley Treatment, Towards a Better Quality of Life for Pillow Angels.” www.pillowangel.org, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Battles, Heather and Manderson, Lenore. 2008. “The Ashley Treatment: Furthering the Anthropology of/on Disability.” Medical Anthropology 27(3): 219–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchbinder, Mara and Timmermans, Stefan. 2011. “Medical Technologies and the Dream of the Perfect Newborn.” Medical Anthropology 30(1): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burne, Brian and Breaux, Becky. May 2013. “Power Wheelchairs: Young Children.” EP Magazine, 32–34.Google Scholar
Calculator, Stephen and Black, Tibbany. 2009. “Validation of an Inventory of Best Practices in the Provision of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services to Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 18: 329–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvorsky, G. 2006. “Helping Families Care for the Helpless.” http://sentientdevelopments.blogspot.com/2006/11helping-families-care-for-helpless_06.html, accessed June 26, 2007.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2008. “Childhood Disability and Parental Moral Responsibility in Northern Vietnam: Towards Ethnographies of Intercorporeality.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(4): 826–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, N. January 2007. “Pillow Angel Ethics.” Time Magazine Online. http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1574851,00.html, accessed April 4, 2007.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara. 2006. “Disability, Connectivity and Transgressing the Autonomous Body.” Journal of Medical Humanities 27: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara, Carnevale, Franco and King, Gillian. 2012. “This Is My Way: Reimagining Disability, In/dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies.” Disability and Rehabilitation 34(2): 1894–1899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara and Teachman, Gail. 2012. “Critical Approaches in Physical Therapy Research: Investigating the Symbolic Value of Walking.” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 28(6): 474–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, B. P., Teachman, G, Wright, V, Fehlings, D, Young, N. I and McKeever, P. 2011. “Children’s and Parent’s Beliefs Regarding the Value of Walking: Rehabilitation Implications for Children with Cerebral Palsy.” Child Care, Health and Development 38(1): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimp Parade. 2007. The Ransom Notes Campaign. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/12/ransom-notes-campaign.html, accessed December 24, 2007.Google Scholar
Gunther, D. F. and Diekema, D. S. 2006. “Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma.” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 160(10): 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfon, Neal, Houtrow, Amy, Larson, Kandyce and Newacheck, Paul. 2012. “The Changing Landscape of Disability in Childhood.” The Future of Children 22(1): 13–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockenberry, John. 2007. “Ashley X: Straight on til Mourning.” Posted on The Gimp Parade, February 23, 2007. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/02/Saturday-slumgullion-29.html, accessed June 29, 2007.Google Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2009. “The Ultrasonic Picture Show and the Politics of Threatened Life.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23(3): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivry, Tsipy, Teman, Elly and Frumkin, Ayala. 2011. “God-sent Ordeals and Their Discontents: Ultra-orthodox Jewish Women Negotiate Prenatal Testing.” Social Science & Medicine 72: 1527–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasnitz, Devva and Block, Pamela. 2012. “Participation, Time, Effort, and Speech Disability Justice.” In Politics of Occupation-Centered Practice: Reflections on Occupational Engagement across Cultures, ed. Pollard, Nick and Sakellariou, Dikaios, 197–216. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, Ellin. 2014. “All the Time They Need.” Educational Leadership 72(3): 64–71.Google Scholar
Kent-Walsh, Jennifer and McNaughton, David. 2005. “Communication Partner Instruction on AAC: Present Practices and Future Directions.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 21(3): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Amie and Fahsl, Allison. 2012. “Supporting Social Competence in Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Teaching Exceptional Children 45(1): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsman, Gail. 2003. “Emplotting Children’s Lives: Developmental Delay vs Disability.” Social Science & Medicine 56: 1947–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landsman, Gail. 2009. Reconstructing Motherhood and Disability in the Age of Perfect Babies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liptap, Amanda. http://peek3d.com/category/testimonial, accessed April 4, 2015.Google Scholar
Mankoff, Jennifer, Hayes, Gillian and Kasnitz, Devva. 2010. “Disability Studies As a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology.” Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2010: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, Mark. 2011. “They’re the Ultimate Teammates.” Albany Times Union. www.timesunion.com/sports/article/They-re-the-ultimate-teammates-1412561.php, accessed June 9, 2011.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Janice. 2014. “Digital Imagery and Child Embodiment in Paediatric Genetics: Sources and Relationships of Meaning.” Sociology 48(2): 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLauglin, Janice and Clavering, Emma. 2012. “Visualising Difference, Similarity and Belonging in Paediatric Genetics.” Sociology of Health Illness 34(3): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, David, Rackensperger, Tracy, Wood, Elizabeth Bender, Carole Krezman, Michael Williams and Janice, Light. 2008. “‘A Child Needs to Be Given a Chance to Succeed’: Parents of Individuals Who Use AAC Describe the Benefits and Challenges of Learning AAC Technologies.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, Hilary, Sutherland, Dean and McAuliffe, Megan. 2011. “The Effect of Pause Time upon the Communicative Interactions of Young People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 13(5): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, Mansha, Magasi, Susan and Hammel, Joy. 2016. “Soul Searching Occupations: Critical Reflections on Occupational Therapy’s Commitment to Social Justice, Disability Rights, and Participation.” In Occupying Disability: Critical Approaches to Community, Justice, and Decolonizing Disability, ed. Block, Pamela, Kasnitz, Devva, Nishida, Akemi and Pollard, Nick, 159–174. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Kevin. 2012. “It’s About Time! Understanding the Experience of Speech Impairment.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, ed. Watson, Nick, Roulstone, Alan and Thomas, Carol, 165–177. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phelan, Sharon, Wright, Virginia and Gibson, Barbara. 2014. “Representations of Disability and Normality in Rehabilitation Technology Promotional Materials.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36(24): 2072–2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilkington, Ed. 15 Mar. 2012. “The Ashley Treatment: ‘Her Life Is As Good As We Can Possibly Make It.’” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/society/2012/mar/15/ashley-treatment-email-exchange, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna and Ginsburg, Faye. 2011. “Reverberations: Disability and the New Kinship Imaginary.” Anthropological Quarterly 86(2): 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. 26 Jan. 2007. “A Convenient Truth” [Op-Ed]. The New York Times.Google Scholar
State of Connecticut. 2009. “Governor Rell Signs Bill Limiting Obstetric Ultrasounds to Medically Necessary Procedures,” June 24. www.ct.gov/governorrell/cwp/view.asp?A=3675&Q=442298&pp=12&n=1, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan and Buchbinder, Mara. 2010. “Patients-in Waiting: Living between Sickness and Health in the Genomics Era.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(4): 408–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TVNZ. 2014. “Charley Girl.” http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday-news/charley-girl-video-5974811, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. 2011. “Maribel’s Story: How Eating Queso Fresco Harmed Her Unborn Baby.” www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/PeopleAtRisk/ucm106727.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. 2014. “Avoid Fetal Keepsake Images,” Heartbeat Monitors. www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095508.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Ian, Davis, Arlene, Skinner, Debra and Bailey, Donald, Jr. 2007. “A Place for Genetic Uncertainty: Parents Valuing an Unknown in the Meaning of Disease.” Social Science & Medicine 65: 1082–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiart, L. and Darrah, J. 2002. “Changing Philosophical Perspectives on the Management of Children with Physical Disabilities: Their Effect on the Use of Powered Mobility.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24(9): 492–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiart, Lesley, Darrah, Johanna, Hollis, Vivien, Cook, Al and May, Laura. 2004. “Mothers’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Use of Powered Mobility.” Physical Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 24(4): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilford, Benjamin, Steven Miller, Paul, Korfiatis, Carolyn, Diekema, Douglas, Dudzinski, Denise, Goering, Sara, and the Seattle Growth Attenuation and Ethics Working Group. 2010. “Navigating Growth Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities: Children’s Interests, Family Decision-Making, and Community Concerns.” Hastings Center Report 40(6): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, Paul. 2012. “Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability.” The Future of Children 22(1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bailey, Lucy. 2001. “Gender Shows: First-Time Mothers and Embodied Selves.” Gender & Society 15(1): 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berend, Zsuzsa. 2010. “Surrogate Losses: Understandings of Pregnancy Loss and Assisted Reproduction among Surrogate Mothers.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 24(2): 240–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2006. “Sacred Conceptions: Clinical Theodicies, Uncertain Science, and Technologies of Procreation in India.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30: 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna. 2004. “‘Cheaper Than a Newcomer’: On the Political Economy of IVF in Israel.” Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7): 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corea, Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Crozier, G. K. D., Johnson, Jennifer L. and Hajzler, Christopher. 2014. “At the Intersections of Emotional and Biological Labor: Understanding Commercial Surrogacy As Social Reproduction.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7(2): 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R. 1992. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Deomampo, Daisy. 2013. “Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism.” Gender & Society 27(4): 514–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, Dion. 1996. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 1998. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. 2013. “Conception through a Looking Glass: The Paradox of IVF.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27(6): 747–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gammeltoft, Tine M. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, E. 1996. “Fetal Ultrasound Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge in Greece.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10(2): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Sallie. 2014. Pregnancy in Practice: Expectation and Experience in the Contemporary US. London: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Inhorn, Marcia. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2007. “Embodied Responsibilities: Pregnancy in the Eyes of Japanese Ob-Gyns.” Sociology of Health and Illness 29(2): 251–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Ivry, Tsipy. 2010a. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2010b. “Kosher Medicine and Medicalized Halacha: An Exploration of Triadic Relations among Israeli Rabbis, Doctors, and Infertility Patients.” American Ethnologist 37(4): 662–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2015. “The Pregnancy Manifesto: Notes on How to Extract Reproduction from the Petri Dish.” Medical Anthropology 34(3): 274–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, Susan Martha. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Renate. 1992. The Ultimate Colonisation: Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. Dublin: Attic Press.Google Scholar
Longhurst, Robyn. 2001. “Breaking Corporeal Boundaries: Pregnant Bodies in Public Places.” In Contested Bodies, ed. Holliday, R. and Hassard, J., 81–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. M. 2001. Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, L. M. 1990. “The Medicalization of Anthropology: A Critical Perspective on the Critical-Clinical Debate.” Social Science and Medicine 30: 945–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pande, Amrita. 2009. “It May Be Her Eggs but It Is My Blood: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology 32(4): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Amrita. 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing the Perfect Mother Worker.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35(4): 969–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack Petchesky, Rosalind. 1987. “Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction.” Feminist Studies 13(2): 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ragoné, Helena. 1999. “Surrogate Motherhood, Gamete Donation, and Constructions of Altruism.” In Transformative Motherhood: On Giving and Getting in a Consumer Culture, ed. Layne, L. L., 65–88. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raymond, Janice G. 1993. Women As Wombs : Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women’s Freedom. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 1998a. “Examining Surrogacy Discourses: Between Feminine Power and Exploitation.” In Small Wars: The Cultural Politics of Childhood, ed. Scheper-Hughes, N. and Sargent, C. F., 93–110. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 1998b. “Native Narratives of Connectedness: Surrogate Motherhood and Technology.” In Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, ed. Dumit, J. and Davis-Floyd, R., 193–211. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1993. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 2000. Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rowland, Robyn. 1992. Living Laboratories: Woman and Reproductive Technologies. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2009. “Working India’s Reproduction Assembly Line: Surrogacy and Reproductive Rights?” Western Humanities Review 66(3): 77–102.Google Scholar
Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2012. “India’s Reproductive Assembly Line.” Contexts 11(2): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sered, Susan Starr. 2000. What Makes Women Sick?: Maternity, Modesty and Militarism in Israeli Society. Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Janelle S. 2008. The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Teman, Elly. 2008. “The Red String: The Cultural History of a Jewish Folk Symbol.” In Jewishness: Expression, Identity, and Representation, ed. Bronner, S. J., 29–57. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar
Teman, Elly. 2009. “Embodying Surrogate Motherhood: Pregnancy As a Dyadic Body Project.” Body & Society 15(3): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teman, Elly. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vora, Kalindi. 2012. “Limits of ‘Labor’: Accounting for Affect and the Biological in Transnational Surrogacy and Service Work.” South Atlantic Quarterly 111(2): 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, Kalindi. 2013. “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy.” Current Anthropology 54(7): s97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×